DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the West Dorset Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the West Dorset Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the West Dorset Council electoral review This PDF document contains 14 submissions from Local Residents. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 West Dorset District Personal Details: Name: James Aldhouse E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Batcombe Ridge, the map does not allow me to draw it on, is a MUCH more logical divide culturally and historically the Wriggle Valley has remained with Yetminster as its focal point. Chetnole especially, my village should remain firmly within a Yetminster Ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3269 17/04/2014 Cooper, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 17 April 2014 09:09 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Chetnole and Stockwood Boundary From: James Aldhouse Sent: 16 April 2014 21:11 To: Reviews@ Subject: Chetnole and Stockwood Boundary Dear Sir It is with some concern I note in communications received that the recent boundary changes proposed will separate Chetnole from Yetminster. As a resident of Chetnole I feel NO affinity with either Cattistock , Frome St Quintin or Sydling. Please forward this e mail to whoever has the responsibility for such changes and register my concern. I know there are many in my community who feel the same and I look forward to a change in policy which leaves Chetnole with Yetminster which is the historical and cultural home where Chetnole belongs. James E Aldhouse 8 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 West Dorset District Personal Details: Name: Carolyn and David Bickford E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Dear Boundary Commission, We fully support the Chesil Bank Parish Council concerns in their letter of 8 November 2013. The Boundary Commission proposal to join Chesil Bank Ward with Chickerell Ward fails to meet the legislative requirements for boundary changes at every level, namely - 1. The identities and interests of Chesil and Chickerell communities are completely different. The former are Rural Agricultural and Tourist Villages and an inherent part of the UN World Heritage Site concentrating on observing the UN requirements by carefully managed environmental conservation.The latter is a designated Town incorporating an expanding urban industrial complex. 2. Effective and convenient government will be almost impossible within these conflicting interests of each community. Without exaggeration this conflict could also lead to conflict with the UN on the interpretation of WHS obligations. 3. The boundaries between the rural Chesil and the urban Chickerell are blurred under the proposal and are not easily identified. 4. The boundary proposed breaks the local ties explained above not only of Chesil but also of Chickerell. 5. The proposal creates a new Ward of 3 Councillors for an Electorate of 5716. Existing Chesil has an Electorate of 1776. This leaves Chickerell with an Electorate of 3940 which equates to 2 Councillors. The Chickerell Electorate is well below the equivalent urban Wards of Bridport N 6196 and Bridport S 5499 which each have 3 Councillors. The Commission, by artificially deducting 300 electors from Chesil and boosting Chickerell numbers by including the balance of Chesil's 1476 electors in order to try and equate Chickerell to Bridport N and S and give Chickerell 3 councillors, ignores equivalence by failing to propose Chickerell 2 Councillors and Chesil 1 Councillor. We request the Commission reflects again upon its obligations under the Legislation and revises the boundary proposal to retain the current boundaries of Chickerell and Chesil Bank and have 2 Councillors for the former and 1 Councillor for Chesil. Yours sincerely Carolyn Bickford David Bickford CB Sent from my iPad Dear Boundary Commission, We fully support the Chesil Bank Parish Council concerns in their letter of 8 November 2013. The Boundary Commission proposal to join Chesil Bank Ward with Chickerell Ward fails to meet the legislative requirements for boundary changes at every level, namely - 1. The identities and interests of Chesil and Chickerell communities are completely different. The former are Rural Agricultural and Tourist Villages and an inherent part of the UN World Heritage Site concentrating on observing the UN requirements by carefully managed environmental conservation.The latter is a designated Town incorporating an expanding urban industrial complex. 2. Effective and convenient government will be almost impossible within these conflicting interests of each community. Without exaggeration this conflict could also lead to conflict with the UN on the interpretation of WHS obligations. 3. The boundaries between the rural Chesil and the urban Chickerell are blurred under the proposal and are not easily identified. 4. The boundary proposed breaks the local ties explained above not only of Chesil but also of Chickerell. 5. The proposal creates a new Ward of 3 Councillors for an Electorate of 5716. Existing Chesil has an Electorate of 1776. This leaves Chickerell with an Electorate of 3940 which equates to 2 Councillors. The Chickerell Electorate is well below the equivalent urban Wards of Bridport N 6196 and Bridport S 5499 which each have 3 Councillors. The Commission, by artificially deducting 300 electors from Chesil and boosting Chickerell numbers by including the balance of Chesil's 1476 electors in order to try and equate Chickerell to Bridport N and S and give Chickerell 3 councillors, ignores equivalence by failing to propose Chickerell 2 Councillors and Chesil 1 Councillor. We request the Commission reflects again upon https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3295 24/04/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 its obligations under the Legislation and revises the boundary proposal to retain the current boundaries of Chickerell and Chesil Bank and have 2 Councillors for the former and 1 Councillor for Chesil. Yours sincerely Carolyn Bickford David Bickford CB Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3295 24/04/2014 Cooper, Mark From: Egan, Helen Sent: 10 March 2014 16:13 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Chetnole boundaries Hi Mark, Please see the below submission for West Dorset. Regards, Helen From: Jackie Boulter Sent: 10 March 2014 14:24 To: Reviews@ Subject: Chetnole boundaries Dear Sirs, re: Chetnole and Stockwood I have been informed by our Parish Council that the Local Government Boundary Commission has recommended that my village, Chetnole, be separated from Yetminster Ward and instead to be included in a new Frome Valley Ward. I am writing to protest at this decision. Chetnole is less than 2 miles from Yetminster, and more than 5 miles at least from the other suggested villages (Sydling St Nicholas, Cattistock and Frome St Quintin) with whom this village as no connections at all. Chetnole is inextricably linked to Yetminster: Chetnole children go to the primary school in Yetminster The vicar of our church lives in Yetminster, and administers to both churches plus Leigh's church Our nearest shops and Post Office are in Yetminster The train line connects Chetnole with Yetminster The medical centre to be used by Chetnole residents is in Yetminster Even socially, we connect with Yetminster - eg: the annual Inter-village Competition which pits Yetminster v. the other small surrounding villages (Chetnole and Leigh) in sports and quiz competitions I would strongly advise that your draft recommendation be reconsidered, as it clearly does not take into consideration the historic and practical connections between our two villages, and the 'Community Identity' that binds us together. Yours faithfully, Jacqueline Boulter 37 Cooper, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 16 April 2014 09:34 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Chetnole & Stockwood Parish Council From: Jill Bray Sent: 15 April 2014 20:24 To: Reviews@ Subject: Chetnole & Stockwood Parish Council Dear Sirs, We understand from our local Parish Council that WDDC propose to separate Chetnole from Yetminster Ward and put us into a new Frome Valley Ward with Sydling St. Nicholas, Cattistock and Frome St. Quintin. We wish to protest most strongly against being separated from Yetminster Ward as we have very close ties both geographically and socially with Yetminster and Leigh and surrounding area. Our local junior school is in Yetminster, our local shops are in Yetminster and Leigh and we share churches with Yetminster, Leigh and Chetnole. Our local garage is in Leigh and we also enjoy close community and social ties with Yetminster and Leigh. These ties include supporting each other through charity raising events, fetes, fitness classes, Arts Reach events, Moviola Film showings in Yetminster and Leigh, art classes in Chetnole, the Chetnole & Leigh Garden Club and many more events too numerous to name them all! In the summer we all enjoy an ‘inter village’ competition, with a quiz, crochet, boules, rounders for the children, golf, etc. etc.. This competition between the three villages is very much enjoyed by all and supported keenly. Please do NOT take away these important links for our Parish Council and put us in a ward with villages that are remote geographically and with whom we have no social connections. Yours, Jill and Nigel Bray 11 Cooper, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 28 April 2014 14:29 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: West Dorset District Council Draft Recommendations Attachments: Comments on Draft Recommendations April 2014.doc From: Bob Gillis (Bridport TC) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 28 April 2014 10:35 To: Reviews@ Subject: West Dorset District Council Draft Recommendations Please find attached comments from Bridport Town Council on the draft recommendations for West Dorset District Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parish and Town Council Submissions to the West Dorset Council Electoral Review
    Parish and Town council submissions to the West Dorset Council electoral review This PDF document contains 8 submissions from Parish and Town councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Cooper, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 25 April 2014 14:22 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Electoral Review of West Dorset From: Christopher Dobbs [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 25 April 2014 13:16 To: Reviews@ Subject: FW: Electoral Review of West Dorset From: Christopher Dobbs [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 23 April 2014 12:39 Subject: Electoral Review of West Dorset Review Officer (West Dorset ) Local Government Boundary Commission for England At their recent April Meeting, Bothenhampton & Walditch Parish Council considered the recommendations of the Local Government Boundary Commission to reduce the number of West Dorset District Councillors to one for the Wards of Bothenhampton and Walditch. At the present time, B&WPC have the guidance of a District Councillor from each Ward who regularly attend the monthly Parish Council Meetings, and it was the majority view of the PC for this most satisfactory arrangement to continue. It is therefore, the recommendation of Bothenhampton & Walditch Parish Council that a District Councillor continues to represent each Ward. Any reduction in this provision will inevitably cause the enablement of democracy to be challenged. Sent by Christopher Dobbs Clerk to B&WPC, Wednesday 23 April 2014 16 Cooper, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 20 March 2014 09:10 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Bouindary Commission Attachments: LGBC letter.doc; boundary commission response2 v3.doc From: Sue Woodford (Chetnole-PC) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 19 March 2014 00:50 To: Reviews@ Subject: FW: Bouindary Commission Hello Please find attached covering letter and submission to the draft recommendations in the Boundary Commission review of West Dorset.
    [Show full text]
  • FOOTNOTES Newsletter of the Dorset Area of the Ramblers Association ISSUE NO
    DORSET FOOTNOTES Newsletter of the Dorset Area of the Ramblers Association ISSUE NO. 73 Spring 2016 WE NEED YOUR HELP - GET INVOLVED, GIVE US YOUR SUGGESTIONS Those of you that have read the Dorset Area Annual Report 2014/2015 will know that the Area is financially sound, has a slowly decreasing membership and has a happy set of volunteers looking after the local engine room. There is, however, a downside, we do have several vacancies that need to be filled. After four years as Chairman, Keith Seymour has stood down and no one has volunteered to stand. Keith left us with an excellent legacy and Area Council recorded their thanks and appreciation to him with special reference to his leading role in setting up the 4050 Walkers Group and, with Jim Scott, redesigning the Website. A quick reference to the Who’s Who on page 7 will show you that we also have Area Council Vacancies for Vice Chairman, Publicity Officer, Countryside Secretary and three Individual Members, the latter being a great way to join in and learn ‘the ways’ of Area Council. The Area General Meeting was held on 21st November 2015 and the main speaker was Des Garrahan, Chair of The Board of Trustees. Unfortunately the turnout was very low, at 23 persons, a factor that no doubt contributed to the difficulty in filling Area Council Vacancies. There was an extended discussion as to the possible reasons for the very low turnout at the Area AGM as compared to the Group AGMs and possible ways to improve it.
    [Show full text]
  • Church and Churchyard Memorial Inscriptions
    CHURCH AND CHURCHYARD MEMORIAL INSCRIPTIONS St MARY’S CHURCH FROME St QUINTIN INTRODUCTION Transcripts of the memorial stones in the church and churchyard of St. Mary’s Church, Frome St. Quintin were first made in 1986 by members of the Frome Valley History Society, led by Wendy Wright of Holywell House, Holywell.. The work was revised in 2009 by Graham and Jennifer Browne of Frome Farm House, Frome St. Quintin. The transcripts have been made to the best of our ability, bearing in mind the effects of weathering over sometimes quite a long period of time, and we believe them to be a true record of the material at the time of reading. In reading the following transcripts, the slashes represent the end of the line on the tombstone or memorial to guide the readers in finding the actual words for themselves. Where there is doubt about the actual wording due to erosion of the materials, either question marks or dashes will be found. The numbers on the plan reflect those of the typescript records. For further details of the men whose names appear on the two war memorials in the church, refer to the ‘Book of Remembrance’. INDEX NAME PAGE NAME PAGE ABBOTT DANIELLS Charles 5 Eliza 5 BAKER William Lovelace 5 Ann 7 DAY Benjamin 7 Francis Harry 2 George 7 DOWELL Hannah 7 F. (Cpl) 8 Jemina 7 EDWARDS John 7 Frances 1 Joseph 7 John 1 Margaret 7 Mary 1 BARTLETT Richard 1 Jane 2 Andrew W. I. 6 Mary 2 FARR BISHOP Harling and John 5 Elizabeth 1 GILES- PULLER William 1 Francis 1 BRIDGE 1, 8 Marjorie Frances Ann 7 HALL Elizabeth 7 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Heneford House CHETNOLE, NR SHERBORNE, DORSET Heneford House CHETNOLE, NR SHERBORNE DORSET
    Heneford House CHETNOLE, NR SHERBORNE, DORSET Heneford House CHETNOLE, NR SHERBORNE DORSET A detached 18th Century house with a separate guest cottage set in delightful gardens and grounds with 100 yards of river frontage Entrance hall • Sitting room • Study • Snug • Shower room Kitchen/dining room • Conservatory • Utility room Master bedroom with en-suite shower room Guest bedroom with en-suite shower room 2 Further bedrooms • Family bathroom Clockmakers Cottage comprising: Entrance hall • Sitting room Kitchen/dining room • Utility room • Cloakroom 2 Double bedrooms Parking • 2 Single garages • Summerhouse • Gardens & Grounds River frontage with fishing rights • Small paddock In all about 1 acre (0.4 hectare) Yetminster 2½ miles • Evershot 4 miles • Yeovil 8½ miles Sherborne 9 miles (London Waterloo 2¼ hours) Dorchester 15 miles (Distances and time approximate) These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact. Your attention is drawn to the Important Notice on the last page of the brochure. Clockmakers Cottage Clockmakers Cottage Heneford House Garden & Grounds Built in 1783, Heneford House is a The house is approached off a quiet country detached, 2-storey period house built of lane onto a tarmac parking area with a local stone under a Welsh slate roof with cottage-style garden on three sides of the a later extension of stone and render with house comprising areas of level lawn on two a clay tiled roof. The property was bought sides with a large area of hardwood decking by the present owners 13 years ago and overlooking the garden at the rear as it falls has undergone a process of complete away in a series of landscaped tiers down renovation and is very well presented with to the River Wriggle.
    [Show full text]
  • Dtrtctorn. ======EVERSHOT and NEIGHBOURHOOD
    Dtrtctorn. =========================== EVERSHOT AND NEIGHBOURHOOD. EvERSHOT is a small village and parish, in the Hosldns is the present incumbent. There is an en• hundred of Tollerford, situated midway between Bea- dowed free grammar school here for the education of minster and Cerne Abbas; distant from London 129 thirty boys of the parish, and for all boys bearing the miles by way of Sherborne. The village is a neat and name of the founder-which was Strickland. The prin­ cleau little place, without posst:ssing any thing worthy cipal seat in the nei~hbourhood is' Alelbury house,' the of especial notice. The river Fro me rises in the parish, seat of the Earl of Ilchester. Formerly a market was and a tributm·y stream to the Iver has its source on the held hea·e on SatUI·d;.y, but it has been discontinued north side of the hill there. The church, an ancient for some years; a fair is still maintained on the 12th of structure, was originally a chapel of ease to Frome St. l\Iay, for cattle, pigs, and cloth. Population of the Quintin, but the living is now held jointly with that parish, by the returns made in 1831, 569, and by the late yarish, and is in the gift of the Crown: the Rev. Henry census (1841} 566. POST O:E':E'IC:£:1 Alexander Welhuau, Post Master.-Letters from all parts arrive (from DoRCHESTER) every morning at half-past nine, and are despatched to that town every aftemoon at a quarter before four. NOBILITY1 GENTRY AND SCHOOLS.
    [Show full text]
  • Passengers to Get Faster Journeys Between Somerset and Dorset Following Bridge Renewal at Yetminster
    Passengers to get faster journeys between Somerset and Dorset following bridge renewal at Yetminster January 17, 2020 Network Rail is to carry out upgrades between Castle Cary and Weymouth over a series of weekends this spring to provide passengers with a more reliable railway and faster journeys. Between January and April, engineers will strengthen tunnels, bridges and refurbish and renew track on the Heart of Wessex line, which links Weymouth and Bristol. The main area of work is at Yetminster in Dorset where a 129-year-old bridge crossing the River Wriggle will be renewed. This requires the closure of the line for six days between Yeovil Pen Mill and Weymouth from Saturday 15 February to Friday 21 February when buses will replace trains. Replacement transport will run between Weymouth and Yeovil Pen Mill to connect with Great Western Railway (GWR) train services towards Bristol Temple Meads. Engineers will work around the clock to replace the deck of Yetminster river bridge, providing a new, a more reliable support for track. There will also be further closures over four weekends to complete the other upgrades to the line. With the new bridge deck installed, a long-standing speed restriction will be removed to provide passengers with faster journeys between Somerset and Dorset, whilst reducing maintenance requirements in the future. Mark Killick, Network Rail Wessex route director, said: “There is never a good time to close an important line for the area’s communities, and we are sorry for the inconvenience the closures will cause. “This significant piece of work to the bridge will be much easier to maintain and together with a reinforced tunnel and new and refurbished track, there will be a much more reliable railway and better journeys for our passengers.” James Wilcox, GWR’s Station Manager for Castle Cary, said: “This package of works will improve reliability on the route for years to come, and once complete and the speed restriction lifted, this will allow us the opportunity to improve journeys times.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish/Town Area Vacant Seats Base Expenses Expenditure Electorate
    Parish/Town Area Vacant Seats Base Expenses Expenditure Electorate Total Expenditure Grand Total per Elector per Elector Abbotsbury 4 740 £0.06 346 £20.76 £760.76 Affpuddle and Turnerspuddle 9 740 £0.06 379 £22.74 £762.74 Alderholt 9 740 £0.06 2523 £151.38 £891.38 Allington 7 740 £0.06 693 £41.58 £781.58 Alton Pancras 2 740 £0.06 132 £7.92 £747.92 Anderson 1 740 £0.06 75 £4.50 £744.50 Arne 8 740 £0.06 1098 £65.88 £805.88 Ashmore 7 740 £0.06 159 £9.54 £749.54 Athelhampton 2 740 £0.06 29 £1.74 £741.74 Batcombe 2 740 £0.06 83 £4.98 £744.98 Beaminster 11 740 £0.06 2589 £155.34 £895.34 Beer Hackett 3 740 £0.06 81 £4.86 £744.86 Bere Regis 11 740 £0.06 1346 £80.76 £820.76 Bettiscombe 2 740 £0.06 50 £3.00 £743.00 Bincombe 3 740 £0.06 78 £4.68 £744.68 Bishop`s Caundle 7 740 £0.06 329 £19.74 £759.74 Blandford Badbury Heights 1 740 £0.06 906 £54.36 £794.36 Blandford Central 6 740 £0.06 3220 £193.20 £933.20 Blandford Hilltop 2 740 £0.06 731 £43.86 £783.86 Blandford Langton St Leonards 4 740 £0.06 1604 £96.24 £836.24 Blandford Old Town 3 740 £0.06 1596 £95.76 £835.76 Blandford St Mary 7 740 £0.06 1152 £69.12 £809.12 Bothenhampton - Bothenhampton 6 740 £0.06 1299 £77.94 £817.94 Bothenhampton - Walditch 3 740 £0.06 534 £32.04 £772.04 Bourton 9 740 £0.06 707 £42.42 £782.42 Bradford Abbas 7 740 £0.06 765 £45.90 £785.90 Bradford Peverell 7 740 £0.06 323 £19.38 £759.38 Bradpole - Bradpole Village 9 740 £0.06 1712 £102.72 £842.72 Bradpole - Claremont 1 740 £0.06 243 £14.58 £754.58 Bridport North 9 740 £0.06 3541 £212.46 £952.46 Bridport South 9 740 £0.06
    [Show full text]
  • Hilfield Manor NEAR SHERBORNE • DORSET
    Hilfield Manor NEAR SHERBORNE • DORSET Hilfield Manor NEAR SHERBORNE • DORSET An impressive unlisted Manor House otherwise known as “Bide’s Castle” beautifully refurbished by the current owners in 2008. This is only the third time Hilfield Manor has come up for sale since it was constructed as an octagonal hunting lodge in the centre of the family estates, by the Dampier family, in 1880 and then significantly extended in 1901 by TW Dampier-Bide. Hilfield Lodge and the Coach House provide extensive ancillary accommodation with scope for a wide range of uses to suit the particular requirements of an incoming purchaser. Sherborne 7½ miles (London Waterloo from 2 hours 12 minutes) • Shaftesbury 23 miles • Beaminster 13 miles Dorchester 14 miles Weymouth 22 miles • London via the A303 132 miles (Distances and time approximate) Accommodation and Amenities Hilfield Manor: hall • drawing room • sitting room • dining room • kitchen / breakfast room utility room • boot room / back hall • cloak room • WC • pantry • 7 bedrooms • 3 bathrooms Hilfield Lodge: sitting room • dining room • kitchen • store rooms • utility room boot room / back hall • 3 bedrooms • 2 bathrooms. Coach House: 2 bedroom annex • double height gallery / studio room games room /office • store rooms • 2 bedrooms • bathroom Outbuildings: garage • summer house • wood store additional store rooms and kennel Gardens • grounds • woodland In all about 14.68 acres (5.94 hectares) Knight Frank LLP Knight Frank LLP Jackson-Stops & Staff 15 Cheap Street, Sherborne 55 Baker Street Church House, Half Moon Street Dorset DT9 3PU London W1U 8AN Sherborne, Dorset DT9 3LN 01935 812236 020 7629 8171 01935 810141 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] www.knightfrank.co.uk www.knightfrank.co.uk www.jackson-stops.co.uk These particulars are intended only as a guide and must not be relied upon as statements of fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Census 1911 Sutton Poyntz (May Not Be Complete) Schedule No Postal Address Number of Rooms Forenames SURNAME Relationship To
    Census 1911 Sutton Poyntz (may not be complete) Schedule Postal address Number Forenames SURNAME Relationship to Age last Particulars as to marriage Occupation & Industry Employer/ Working at Birthplace Nationality Worker home No of rooms Head of House birthday Status Years Total Children married children living M F 104 Sutton Poyntz Nr 4 Godfrey HUTCHINGS Head 31 Married General Labourer Worker Dorset Weymouth British Weymouth Emily HUTCHINGS Wife 29 Married 10 5 4 Worker At home Sutton Poyntz British Adeliade HUTCHINGS Daughter 9 School Dorset Preston com Sutton British Poyntz William HUTCHINGS Son 8 School Dorset Preston com Sutton British Poyntz Wilfred HUTCHINGS Son 5 School Dorset Preston com Sutton British Poyntz Ivy HUTCHINGS Daughter 3 Dorset Preston com Sutton British Poyntz 105 Sutton Poyntz & 3 Albert THORNE Head 49 Married Farm Labour Worker Preston Dorset Weymouth Elizabeth Mary THORNE Wife 46 Married 23 6 6 Worker At home Morton Dorset Walter J THORNE Son 18 Single Butcher Labourer Worker Preston Dorset British Albert John THORNE Son 9 School Preston Dorset Selina THORNE Daughter 5 School Preston Dorset 106 Sutton Poyntz 6 Arthur John SLATTER Head 45 Married Traveller Books & Shoes Worker Coventry, Warwickshire British Weymouth Emily SLATTER Wife 47 Married 21 1 1 At home Tysoe, Warwickshire British Clarissa Emilie SLATTER Daughter 20 Single Dressmaking Own At home Sunderland, Durham British account 107 Sutton Poyntz 4 Thomas FOOKS Head 47 Single Carpenter & Joiner Worker At home Dorset, Bradford British Weymouth Phoebe
    [Show full text]
  • September 2018 Newsletter
    September 2018 Newsletter Hi all, welcome to the September edition of our newsletter. Here in the office we are fully back into post summer holiday mode with our 600th family being referred. We have supported 52 families with 122 children so far this year which is no easy task in just 5 months and with only 43 volunteers. The planned volunteer preparation course starting in Weymouth at the end of September is close to capacity and as you will see below, we are also hoping to run a second course in the Lyme Regis/ Charmouth area. Over the next couple of months we are also hoping to have funding in place to have the Big Hopes, Big Futures and LENA projects back up and running supporting children under 5 with school readiness and language development. And while all of that is going on, we are also signing on the dotted line for an office move in November. Keep an eye open for the October newsletter where we should be able to give you further details. New Volunteer And Another One! Preparation Course Would you or anyone you know be interested in attending a Home-Start West Dorset volunteer preparation course in the Lyme Regis/ Charmouth area? Tammi, our organiser for the West of the region is currently working with a very proactive local councillor, Cheryl, to increase awareness and support capacity in this area. If you are interested in finding out more about getting involved with Home-Start in the Lyme Regis, Charmouth, Bridport or Bemainster area please call the office NOW on 01305 265072 and we will arrange for Tammi to get in touch with you.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset History Centre
    GB 0031 MK Dorset History Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 5598 The National Archives DORSET RECORD OFFICE MK Documents presented to the Dorchester County Museum by Messrs. Traill, Castleman-Smith and Wilson in 1954. DLEDS. N " J Bundle No Date Description of Documents of Documents AFFPUDDLE Tl 1712 Messuage, Cottage and land. 1 BSLCHALWELL and IB3ERT0I? a T2 1830 Land in Fifehead Quinton in Belchalwell and messuage called Quintons in Ibberton; part of close called Allinhere in Ibberton. (Draftsj* 2 BELCHALWELL * * T3 1340 i Cottage (draft); with residuary account of Mary Robbins. 2 BERE REGIS K T4 1773-1781 Cottage and common rights at Shitterton, 1773; with papers of Henry Hammett of the same, including amusing letter complaining of 'Divels dung1 sold to hira, 1778-1731. 11 Messuage at Rye Hill X5 1781-1823 3 a T6 1814-1868 2 messuages, at some time before 1853 converted into one, at iiilborne Stilehara. ' 9 T7 1823-1876 Various properties including cottage in White Lane, Milborne Stileham. 3 BLAHDFOIiD FORUM T8 1641-1890 Various messuages in Salisbury Street, including the Cricketers Arms (1826) and the houses next door to the Bell Inn. (1846,1347) 14 *T9 1667-1871 Messuages in Salisbury Street, and land "whereon there , stood before the late Dreadful Fire a messuage1 (1736) in sane street, 1667-1806, with papers,; 1316-71. 21 TIG 168^6-1687/8 Messuage in Salisbury Street (Wakeford family) A Til 1737-1770 Land in Salisbury Street. (Bastard family) J 2 212 1742-1760 Land in Salisbury Street, with grant to rest timbers on a wall there.
    [Show full text]