DOCSLIB.ORG

Agenda Inglewood Community Board

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agenda Inglewood Community Board Inglewood Community Board Agenda (22 September 2020) - Agenda AGENDA Te Rārangi Take INGLEWOOD COMMUNITY BOARD Te Rūnanga Hapori o Kohanga Moa Tuesday 22 September 2020 at 1.30pm Rātapu 22 Mahuru 2020 hei te 1.30pm Inglewood Library & Service Centre Wharepukapuka me te Ratonga Ratonga o Te Moa Chairperson (Tiamana): Mr Mel Cook Members (Mema): Mr Phill Hird Mr Jono Burrows Mr Graeme Sykes Cr Marie Pearce 1 Inglewood Community Board Agenda (22 September 2020) - Agenda Community Boards Role of community boards (s52 Local Government Act 2002) a) represent, and act as an advocate for, the interests of its community; and b) consider and report on matters referred by the council and other matters of interest c) maintain an overview of services provided by the council within the community; and d) prepare an annual submission to the council for expenditure within the community; e) communicate with community organisations and special interest groups within the community; and f) undertake any other responsibilities that are delegated to it by the territorial authority. Addressing the community board Requests for public forum and deputations need to be made at least one day prior to the meeting. The Chairperson has authority to approve or decline public comments and deputations in line with the standing order requirements. Public Forum Public Forums enable members of the public to bring matters to the attention of the committee which are not contained on the meeting agenda. The matters must relate to the meeting’s terms of reference. Speakers can speak for up to 5 minutes, with no more than two speakers on behalf of one organisation. Deputations Deputations enable a person, group or organisation to speak to the meeting on matters contained on the agenda. An individual speaker can speak for up to 10 minutes. Where there are multiple speakers for one organisation, a total time limit of 15 minutes, for the entire deputation, applies. Purpose of Local Government The reports contained in this agenda address the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to decision making. Unless otherwise stated, the recommended option outlined in each report meets the purpose of local government and: Promote the social, economic, environmental, and cultural well-being of communities in the present and for the future. Would not alter significantly the intended level of service provision for any significant activity undertaken by or on behalf of the Council, or transfer the ownership or control of a strategic asset to or from the Council. END 2 Inglewood Community Board Agenda (22 September 2020) - Table of Contents HEALTH & SAFETY APOLOGIES Phill Hird CONFLICTS OF INTEREST PUBLIC COMMENT Cr Stacey Hitchcock regarding Taranaki Trails Trust DEPUTATIONS None advised COMMUNITY BOARD MINUTES Recommendation That the minutes of the Inglewood Community Board dated 11 August 2020 (ECM8345978) and the proceedings of the said meetings, as previously circulated, be taken as read and confirmed as a true and correct record. REPORTS ITEMS FOR DECISION BY INGLEWOOD COMMUNITY BOARD 1 Community Board Plan Review 2020-2023 2 Members Activity Report – Mel Cook 3 Members Activity Report – Graeme Sykes 4 Members Activity Report – Jono Burrows ITEMS FOR RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL 5 Naming of Roads 6 Three Waters Network Maintenance Service Review & Term Extension 7 Innovating Streets – Kelly Street Cycleway 8 Infrastructure Term Services Contract – Year 1 END 3 1 Inglewood Community Board Agenda (22 September 2020) - Community Board Plan COMMUNITY BOARD PLANS REVIEW PURPOSE 1. The purpose of this report is to advise of the outcomes of the review of the Inglewood Community Board Plan that was originally developed in 2017. RECOMMENDATION That, having considered all matters raised, the Inglewood Community Board Plan be adopted and presented to the next Council meeting. SIGNIFICANCE AND ENGAGEMENT 2. This report is provided for information purposes only, and has been assessed as being of some importance. DISCUSSION 3. The purpose of the community board plans is to build on the New Plymouth District’s Blueprint and facilitate a more integrated approach to planning, infrastructure development and community development in the District’s community board areas. To date, development of the Community Board Plans has been successful in encouraging grass roots engagement in our statutory planning and governance processes. Ultimately this is good for democracy and community participation in decision making. 4. Between elections, or as a result of elections, priorities can change within communities and surrounding areas, for example: a) What seemed very important three years ago may no longer be as important to the community today; b) New issues have arisen or have been resolved within the community; c) Projects or aspirations identified have been achieved; d) Local Government legislation changes have occurred. 5. It is therefore necessary for the community boards to review their plans to ensure that is the best representation of the current issues and aspirations within their community. 6. As the community boards began the review of their plans, COVID-19 Level 4 lockdown occurred. This prevented the ability for face-to-face community meetings. The community boards did, however, continue with their review 4 1 Inglewood Community Board Agenda (22 September 2020) - Community Board Plan through on-line surveys during Level 3 and 4 lockdown, and hard copy surveys once Level 2 had been introduced. 7. The online surveys generated substantial information about the issues and aspirations of each community. 8. There are a number of issues that the community board can take to the Council for their consideration – issues where Council has the potential to effect a change through its investment and policy decisions. 9. Having considered the results of the online surveys and feedback, each Board has prioritised their subsequent understanding of the issues and aspirations that require attention in the community. These have been included in preparatory work for the Council’s Long-Term Plan. 10. The community boards have endeavoured to respond to the priorities indicated by those who have participated in this process; however it has not been possible to reflect all of the aspirations. The hope of the community board is that over the life of the Long-Term Plan many more of the community’s identified priorities can be addressed. NEXT STEPS 11. The community boards have prioritised the aspirational projects they will put forward for funding in the Long-Term Plan, taking into account what the community has told them through their surveys and discussions. Each community board will further support their prioritisations through submission to the Long-term Plan statutory consultation process to be held in March 2021. 12. With the adoption of the Community Board Plans, the next step is to develop community investment plans that will capture the extent and timing of projects planned for each community within the board area. FINANCIAL AND RESOURCING IMPLICATIONS 13. Achieving the issues and aspirations in the community board plans will require financial and non-financial resourcing. The allocation of funding ultimately rests with the Council through the Long-Term Plan. 14. In conversations with the focus groups and during community consultation the community boards have stressed that resourcing limitations will mean not all priorities, issues or aspirations may be resolved or achieved. Some of the issues and aspirations identified are beyond the scope of Council activity, thus a partnership with community and social services organisations, iwi and business will be required to further consider the action required in these areas. 5 1 Inglewood Community Board Agenda (22 September 2020) - Community Board Plan 15. Review of a Community Board Plans will mean that the community boards can focus on those matters of greatest importance to the communities that they are tasked with advocating for. IMPLICATIONS ASSESSMENT 16. This report confirms that the matter concerned has no particular implications and has been dealt with in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002. Specifically: Council staff have delegated authority for any decisions made; Council staff have identified and assessed all reasonably practicable options for addressing the matter and considered the views and preferences of any interested or affected persons (including Māori), in proportion to the significance of the matter; Council staff have considered how the matter will promote the social, economic, environmental, and cultural well-being of communities in the present and the future. Unless stated above, any decisions made can be addressed through current funding under the Long-Term Plan and Annual Plan; Any decisions made are consistent with the Council's plans and policies; and No decisions have been made that would alter significantly the intended level of service provision for any significant activity undertaken by or on behalf of the Council, or would transfer the ownership or control of a strategic asset to or from the Council. APPENDICES Appendix 1 Inglewood Community Board Plan 2020-2023 (ECM8353359) Report Details Prepared By: Jayne Tidbury-Beer (Community Relations Officer) Team: Governance Approved By: Julie Straka (Governance Lead) Ward/Community: South-West/Inglewood Date: 12 August 2020 File Reference: ECM8345496 -------------------------------------------------------End of Report ---------------------------------------------------
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oakura July 2003
    he akura essenger This month JULY 2003 Coastal Schools’ Education Development Group Pictures on page 13 The Minister of Education, Trevor Mallard, has signalled a review of schooling, to include Pungarehu, Warea, Newell, Okato Primary, Okato College, Oakura and Omata schools. The reference group of representatives from the area has been selected to oversee the process and represent the community’s perspective. Each school has 2 representatives and a Principal rep from the Primary and Secondary sector. Other representatives include, iwi, early childhood education, NZEI, PPTA, local politicians, Federated Farmers, School’s Trustee Association and the Ministry of Education in the form of a project manager. In general the objectives of the reference group are to be a forum for discussion of is- sues with the project manager. There will be plenty of opportunity for the local com- Card from the Queen for munities to have input. Sam and Tess Dobbin Page 22 The timeframe is to have an initial suggestion from the Project Manager by September 2003. Consultation will follow until December with a preliminary announcement from the Ministry of Education in January 2004. Further consultation will follow with the Minister’s final announcement likely in June 2004. This will allow for any develop- ment needed to be carried out by the start of the 2005 school year. The positive outcome from a review is that we continue to offer quality education for Which way is up? the children of our communities for the next 10 to 15 years as the demographics of our communities are changing. Nick Barrett, Omata B.O.T Chairperson Page 5 Our very own Pukekura Local artist “Pacifica of Land on Sea” Park? Page 11 exhibits in Florence Local artist Caz Novak has been invited to exhibit at the Interna- tional Biennale of Contemporary Art in Florence this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Week 5
    Term 2 Week 5 Thursday 3 June 2021 St John Bosco School 21 Clinton Street, New Plymouth. Phone (06) 758-3165 e-mail: offi[email protected], www.sjb.school.nz Principal: Mr Dee Luckin From the Principals Desk... It was a special occasion for our Year 6 students on Monday to travel to Opunake and be a part of Mr Flemings welcome Powhiri. This was a moving occasion and it was a great feeling seeing Ryan back TERM DATES where learning began for him. We are catching up daily and everything is going incredibly well for Ryan. Term 2 Mon 3 May - Fru 9 Jul Term 3 Mon 26 Jul - Fri 1 Oct Term 4 Mon 18 Oct - Thu 16 Dec EVENTS Teacher Only Day Fri 25 June School Production: We are and Andrew to our school been allocated 8 Teacher only really excited to be currently community. We also welcome Ellie days to use over a 2 year period. writing our next school production. Bellringer who has also joined We have to date used 2 of the 8 We are keeping the concept pretty room Puriri, Ellie joins her big days. We have scheduled to use close to our hearts at this stage. sister Isla at school. 4 this year and our next Teacher This has been scheduled for the only day will be Friday June 25th. last week of Term 3 and more Interschool Sports: School will be closed on this day. details about days and times will Mangorei School - 11th June come home early next term.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Taranaki Regional Public Transport Plan 2020-2030
    Draft Regional Public Transport Plan for Taranaki 2020/2030 Taranaki Regional Council Private Bag 713 Stratford Document No: 2470199 July 2020 Foreword (to be inserted) Table of contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Strategic context 2 2.1. Period of the Plan 4 3. Our current public transport system 5 4. Strategic case 8 5. Benefits of addressing the problems 11 6. Objectives, policies and actions 12 6.1. Network 12 6.2. Services 13 6.3. Service quality 14 6.4. Farebox recovery 17 6.5. Fares and ticketing 17 6.6. Process for establishing units 19 6.7. Procurement approach for units 20 6.8. Managing, monitoring and evaluating unit performance 22 6.9. Transport-disadvantaged 23 6.10. Accessibility 24 6.11. Infrastructure 25 6.12. Customer interface 26 7. Proposed strategic responses 28 Appendix A: Public transport services integral to the public transport network 31 Appendix B: Unit establishment 34 Appendix C: Farebox recovery policy 36 Appendix D: Significance policy 40 Appendix E: Land Transport Management Act 2003 requirements 42 1. Introduction The Taranaki Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP or the plan), prepared by Taranaki Regional Council (the Council), is a strategic document that sets out the objectives and policies for public transport in the region, and contains details of the public transport network and development plans for the next 10 years (2020-2030). Purpose This plan provides a means for the Council, public transport operators and other key stakeholders to work together in developing public transport services and infrastructure. It is an instrument for engaging with Taranaki residents on the design and operation of the public transport network.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Ngamotu Domain Recreation Reserve
    4. Ngamotu Domain Recreation Reserve Description Location: Pioneer Road, New Plymouth Legal description: Sect 1010 Grey District Lot 3 DP 9266 Lot 4 DP 9266 Size: 8.62 hectares Reserve Status: Subject to the Reserves Act 1977 Reserve Classification Recreation reserve Breakwater Road Pioneer Road Windy Point Reserve South Road SH45 Physical description Ngamotu Domain is a sports park located in Moturoa. Two vehicle accesses are located off Pioneer Road with additional pedestrian access from SH 45 South Road and Otaka Street (an unformed street) which is off SH 44 Breakwater Road. The sports park has two fields available. The current sport played at the park is rugby league. The eastern side of the park is Open Space A Environment Area in the District Plan. These areas are used primarily for organised sports and recreation. Such areas will normally have associated buildings such as clubrooms, changing sheds or toilet Parks Sports Parks Management Plan New Plymouth District Council 2012 facilities. To the West is Open Space B Environment Area which is characterised by those areas that are predominantly focused towards informal recreational pursuits, usually of a more passive nature, such as walking and playing. They are more open, with less built features than the Open Space A Environment Area. The park is surrounded by a mix of Residential A and B Environment Areas, Industrial D to the north and Motorua Primary School to the northwest. Tangata whenua interests This reserve is within the tribal rohe of Te Atiawa and Taranaki Iwi. It is of historic and cultural significance to Ng āti Te Whiti and Ng ā Mahanga-a-Tairi hap ū.
    [Show full text]
  • Trustpower Motukawa Hydro Scheme Monitoring Report
    Trustpower Ltd Motukawa HEP Scheme Monitoring Programme Monitoring Report 2010-2014 Technical Report 2014-79 ISSN: 0114-8184 (Print) Taranaki Regional Council ISSN: 1178-1467 (Online) Private Bag 713 Document: 1431923 (Word) STRATFORD Document: 1460648 (Pdf) March 2015 Executive summary Trustpower Limited (Trustpower) operates the Motukawa hydroelectric power (HEP) scheme in the Manganui River and Waitara River catchment. Trustpower draws water from behind a weir on the Manganui River near Tariki and diverts this water through a race to Lake Ratapiko and then through penstocks to the Motukawa Power Station. The power station discharges into the Makara Stream, a tributary of the Waitara River. Consents for the Motukawa HEP scheme allow Taranaki Generation Ltd to maintain structures, to take, divert and discharge water, and to disturb the bed of Lake Ratapiko. This report for the period July 2010-June 2014 describes the monitoring programme implemented by the Taranaki Regional Council (the Council) to assess Trustpower’s environmental performance during the period under review, and the results and environmental effects of their activities. Trustpower holds a total of 23 resource consents, which include a total of 176 conditions setting out the requirements that the Company must satisfy. The Company holds five consents to allow it to take and use water, five consents to discharge water or sediment into the Makara, Mangaotea, and Mako streams, one consent to discharge wastes to land around Lake Ratapiko and four land use permits for bed disturbance and structures in the Manganui River, Mangaotea Stream and Lake Ratapiko. Seven additional consents allow Trustpower to abstract water, and construct and maintain structures in the Mangaotea Stream.
    [Show full text]
  • TSB COMMUNITY TRUST REPORT 2016 SPREAD FINAL.Indd
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016 CHAIR’S REPORT Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa Greetings, greetings, greetings to you all The past 12 months have been highly ac ve for the Trust, As part of the Trust’s evolu on, on 1 April 2015, a new Group marked by signifi cant strategic developments, opera onal asset structure was introduced, to sustain and grow the improvements, and the strengthening of our asset base. Trust’s assets for future genera ons. This provides the Trust All laying stronger founda ons to support the success of with a diversifi ca on of assets, and in future years, access to Taranaki, now and in the future. greater dividends. This year the Trust adopted a new Strategic Overview, As well as all this strategic ac vity this year we have including a new Vision: con nued our community funding and investment, and To be a champion of posi ve opportuni es and an agent of have made a strong commitment to the success of Taranaki benefi cial change for Taranaki and its people now and in communi es, with $8,672,374 paid out towards a broad the future range of ac vi es, with a further $2,640,143 commi ed and yet to be paid. Our new Vision will guide the Trust as we ac vely work with others to champion posi ve opportuni es and benefi cial Since 1988 the Trust has contributed over $107.9 million change in the region. Moving forward the Trust’s strategic dollars, a level of funding possible due to the con nued priority will be Child and Youth Wellbeing, with a focus on success of the TSB Bank Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Ryder Hall, New Plymouth Boys’ High School Source: Julia Gatley Date: 2007
    d o c o m o m o _ _ n n International working party for documentation and conservation New International Selection of buildings, sites and neighbourhoods of the Full Documentation Fiche 2003 modern movement composed by national/regional working party of: New Zealand 0. Picture of building/ group of buildings/ urban scheme/ landscape/ garden depicted item: Ryder Hall, New Plymouth Boys’ High School source: Julia Gatley date: 2007 d o c o m o m o _ n _ n International working party for ISC/R members update 2003 documentation and conservation of buildings, sites and neighbourhoods of the for office use only modern movement 1. Identity of building/ group of buildings/ group of buildings/ landscape/ garden 1.1 Data for identification current name: Ryder Hall former/original/variant name: New Plymouth Boys’ High School Assembly Hall number(s) and name(s) of street(s): 107 Coronation Avenue town: New Plymouth province/state: Taranaki Province post code: 4342 block: lot: country: New Zealand national topographical grid reference: unknown current typology: EDC, REC (educational, private halls) former/original/variant typology: EDC, REC (educational, private halls) comments on typology: Purpose built assembly hall still used as such. 1.2 Status of protection protected by: Not currently listed or protected grade: date: valid for: remarks: Although not heritage listed at present this building should be listed on the New Plymouth District Council’s District Plan as an example of Modernist Brutalism. 1.3 Visually or functionally related building(s)/site(s) name(s) of surrounding area/building(s): Alexander Block, also known as CR Block.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Study of Hickford Park and Coastal Walkway Route Options
    Ecological study of Hickford Park and coastal walkway route options 2012 ERI report number: 005 Prepared for the New Plymouth District Council By Rebecca J. Bylsma & Jackson T. Efford Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 6 2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 6 3 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Vegetation assessment ............................................................................................................ 7 3.2 Animal tracking ...................................................................................................................... 8 4 Results: Ecological values .................................................................................................. 9 4.1 Waipu Lagoons ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.1.1 Reedland ....................................................................................................................... 12 4.1.2 Flaxland ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Further Submission in Support Of, Or in Opposition To, a Submission on Npdc’S Notified Proposed District Plan
    FURTHER SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF, OR IN OPPOSITION TO, A SUBMISSION ON NPDC’S NOTIFIED PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN Clause 8 of Schedule 1 Resource Management Act 1991 To: New Plymouth District Council Address: Private Bag 2025, New Plymouth 4342 Email: [email protected] Further Submitter Details Name of further submitter: Jacob Stenner and Meghan Barrett ................................................................. Contact person (if different from above) ..................................................................................................... Postal address: 107 Pendarves Street, New Plymouth .............................................................. Email address for service: [email protected] .................................................................................... Phone number: 0278596008 .................................................................................................. The Council will serve all formal documents by email. Where there is no email address provided, the documents will be posted to the postal address stated above. I am: (please tick relevant box) a) A person representing a relevant aspect of the public interest. ☐ (In this case, also specify the grounds for saying that you come within this category); or b) A person who has an interest in the proposal that is greater than the interest of the ☒ general public. (In this case, also explain the grounds for saying that you come within this category); or c) The local authority for the relevant area. ☐ Please state the grounds as to why you come within the category selected above: If allowed, the Heritage Taranaki submission would have significant implications on our private property rights Council Hearing (please tick relevant box) Do you wish to be heard in support of your further submission? Yes ☒ No ☐ If others make a similar submission would you consider presenting a joint case with them at a hearing? Yes ☒ No ☐ Submission The submission points, support or opposition, reasons and decisions sought are set out in the attached document.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Consents Issued 19 January to 01 March 2018
    Non-notified authorisations issued by the Taranaki Regional Council between 19 Jan 2018 and 01 Mar 2018 Coastal Permit Consent Holder Subtype Primary Industry Purpose Activity R2/5983-2.0 South Taranaki District Council Structure - Protection (Coastal) Building Construction/Drainage/Flood Control NewPurpose R2/10545-1.0 Westside New Zealand Limited Structure - Other (Coastal) Hydrocarbon Exploration New Discharge Permit Consent Holder Subtype Primary Industry Purpose Activity R2/0715-4.1 DH Lepper Trust Land/Water - Animal Waste Piggery Farm ChangePurpose R2/1958-3.0 MLTT Trust Land - animal waste Dairy Farm Replace R2/2804-3.0 MI & PM Stevenson Family Land - animal waste Dairy Farm Replace Trusts Partnership R2/2427-3.0 Wicken Forrest Trusts Land - animal waste Dairy Farm Replace Partnership R2/2755-3.0 Dennis & Audrey Jacobsen Land/Water - Animal Waste Dairy Farm Replace R2/10527-1.0 Bunn Earthmoving Ltd Water - Stormwater Quarries New R2/10513-1.0 Ravensdown Limited Land/Water Industry Fertiliser Storage or Distribution New R2/0705-3.0 Gopperth Farms Limited Land - animal waste Dairy Farm Replace R2/10536-1.0 Darrell Hickey Family Trust Land - animal waste Dairy Farm New R2/10535-1.0 Shell Exploration NZ Limited Land/Water Industry Hydrocarbon Exploration New R2/0999-3.1 Hogsback Limited Land - animal waste Dairy Farm Change R2/0511-4.0 Greenhills Trust Land - animal waste Dairy Farm Replace R2/10529-1.0 New Plymouth District Council Air - Dust Landfill New R2/10530-1.0 New Plymouth District Council Land/Water Industry Landfill New
    [Show full text]
  • Two Ex-Tropical Cyclones Impact New Zealand
    New Zealand Climate Summary: February 2018 Issued: 5 March 2018 Two ex-Tropical Cyclones Impact New Zealand Temperature Mean temperatures were above average (0.51 to 1.20°C of average) or well above average (>1.20°C of average) across the North Island. Temperatures were more than 2°C above the February average for parts of Hawke’s Bay, Gisborne, and across lower Manawatu-Whanganui. In the South Island, temperatures were above average across the north and mostly near average (-0.50 to 0.50°C) across the central and south. Rainfall Rainfall was well above normal (>149% of normal) across much of the upper North Island, Wellington-Wairarapa, the upper South Island, Canterbury and Otago. Elsewhere, rainfall was above normal (120-149% of normal) or near normal (80-119% of normal). Soil Moisture As of 28 February, soils were wetter than normal for the time of year across the upper North Island and the central and upper South Island. Soil moisture was near normal elsewhere; although parts of Hawke’s Bay, Gisborne, and Southland had slightly below normal soil moisture. Click on the link to jump to the information you require: Overview Temperature Rainfall February 2018 climate in the six main centres Highlights and extreme events Overview February 2018 was marked by two ex-Tropical Cyclones, Fehi and Gita, that impacted New Zealand on the 1st and 20th of the month, respectively. These two storms contributed to lower than normal sea level pressure that extended from the tropics to the north of New Zealand and southward across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Climate and Weather of Taranaki
    THE CLIMATE AND WEATHER OF TARANAKI 2nd edition P.R. Chappell © 2014. All rights reserved. The copyright for this report, and for the data, maps, figures and other information (hereafter collectively referred to as “data”) contained in it, is held by NIWA. This copyright extends to all forms of copying and any storage of material in any kind of information retrieval system. While NIWA uses all reasonable endeavours to ensure the accuracy of the data, NIWA does not guarantee or make any representation or warranty (express or implied) regarding the accuracy or completeness of the data, the use to which the data may be put or the results to be obtained from the use of the data. Accordingly, NIWA expressly disclaims all legal liability whatsoever arising from, or connected to, the use of, reference to, reliance on or possession of the data or the existence of errors therein. NIWA recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to their use of the data and that they obtain independent professional advice relevant to their particular circumstances. NIWA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SERIES NUMBER 64 ISSN 1173-0382 Note to Second Edition This publication replaces the first edition of the New Zealand Meteorological Service Miscellaneous Publication 115 (9), written in 1981 by C.S. Thompson. It was considered necessary to update the second edition, incorporating more recent data and updated methods of climatological variable calculation. THE CLIMATE AND WEATHER OF TARANAKI 2nd edition P.R. Chappell 4 CONTENTS SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]