Spatial Distribution of Pingos in Northern Asia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Response of CO2 Exchange in a Tussock Tundra Ecosystem to Permafrost Thaw and Thermokarst Development Jason Vogel,L Edward A
Response of CO2 exchange in a tussock tundra ecosystem to permafrost thaw and thermokarst development Jason Vogel,l Edward A. G. Schuur,2 Christian Trucco,2 and Hanna Lee2 [1] Climate change in high latitudes can lead to permafrost thaw, which in ice-rich soils can result in ground subsidence, or thermokarst. In interior Alaska, we examined seasonal and annual ecosystem CO2 exchange using static and automatic chamber measurements in three areas of a moist acidic tundra ecosystem undergoing varying degrees of permafrost thaw and thermokarst development. One site had extensive thermokarst features, and historic aerial photography indicated it was present at least 50 years prior to this study. A second site had a moderate number of thermokarst features that were known to have developed concurrently with permafrost warming that occurred 15 years prior to this study. A third site had a minimal amount of thermokarst development. The areal extent of thermokarst features reflected the seasonal thaw depth. The "extensive" site had the deepest seasonal thaw depth, and the "moderate" site had thaw depths slightly, but not significantly deeper than the site with "minimal" thermokarst development. Greater permafrost thaw corresponded to significantly greater gross primary productivity (GPP) at the moderate and extensive thaw sites as compared to the minimal thaw site. However, greater ecosystem respiration (Recc) during the spring, fall, and winter resulted in the extensive thaw site being a significant net source of CO2 to the atmosphere over 3 years, while the moderate thaw site was a CO2 sink. The minimal thaw site was near CO2 neutral and not significantly different from the extensive thaw site. -
Surficial Geology Investigations in Wellesley Basin and Nisling Range, Southwest Yukon J.D
Surficial geology investigations in Wellesley basin and Nisling Range, southwest Yukon J.D. Bond, P.S. Lipovsky and P. von Gaza Surficial geology investigations in Wellesley basin and Nisling Range, southwest Yukon Jeffrey D. Bond1 and Panya S. Lipovsky2 Yukon Geological Survey Peter von Gaza3 Geomatics Yukon Bond, J.D., Lipovsky, P.S. and von Gaza, P., 2008. Surficial geology investigations in Wellesley basin and Nisling Range, southwest Yukon. In: Yukon Exploration and Geology 2007, D.S. Emond, L.R. Blackburn, R.P. Hill and L.H. Weston (eds.), Yukon Geological Survey, p. 125-138. ABSTRACT Results of surficial geology investigations in Wellesley basin and the Nisling Range can be summarized into four main highlights, which have implications for exploration, development and infrastructure in the region: 1) in contrast to previous glacial-limit mapping for the St. Elias Mountains lobe, no evidence for the late Pliocene/early Pleistocene pre-Reid glacial limits was found in the study area; 2) placer potential was identified along the Reid glacial limit where a significant drainage diversion occurred for Grayling Creek; 3) widespread permafrost was encountered in the study area including near-continuous veneers of sheet-wash; and 4) a monitoring program was initiated at a recently active landslide which has potential to develop into a catastrophic failure that could damage the White River bridge on the Alaska Highway. RÉSUMÉ Les résultats d’études géologiques des formations superficielles dans le bassin de Wellesley et la chaîne Nisling peuvent être résumés en quatre principaux faits saillants qui ont des répercussions pour l’exploration, la mise en valeur et l’infrastructure de la région. -
Late Quaternary Environment of Central Yakutia (NE' Siberia
Late Quaternary environment of Central Yakutia (NE’ Siberia): Signals in frozen ground and terrestrial sediments Spätquartäre Umweltentwicklung in Zentral-Jakutien (NO-Sibirien): Hinweise aus Permafrost und terrestrischen Sedimentarchiven Steffen Popp Steffen Popp Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung Forschungsstelle Potsdam Telegrafenberg A43 D-14473 Potsdam Diese Arbeit ist die leicht veränderte Fassung einer Dissertation, die im März 2006 dem Fachbereich Geowissenschaften der Universität Potsdam vorgelegt wurde. 1. Introduction Contents Contents..............................................................................................................................i Abstract............................................................................................................................ iii Zusammenfassung ............................................................................................................iv List of Figures...................................................................................................................vi List of Tables.................................................................................................................. vii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ vii 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 2. Regional Setting and Climate...................................................................................4 -
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information Table S1. List of samples that yielded DNA in this study (EE2-EE26), followed by successfully amplified samples of cave lion from the study by Barnett et al. 2009. ALA=Alaska, EUR=Europe, SIB=Siberia, NC=not calibrated as out of range. The asterisk (*) denotes the approximate age as reported in Barnett et al. 2009. Sample CR haplotype/ Uncalibrated Calendar years Site and geographic region ID Genbank nr. 14C date before present EE2 D/ DQ899903 Schusterlucke cave (EUR) 15400 ± 130 18521 ± 1844 EE4 - Tyung, C Siberia (SIB) 46700±1300 48181 ± 6747 EE3 Y3 Tain cave, Urals (EUR) >49600 NC EE6 Y1 Elovka, Baikal (SIB) 18350 ± 75 21634 ± 1504 EE7 Y1 Volchika, C Siberia (SIB) 20085 ± 80 23266 ± 576 EE13 J/ DQ899909 New Siberian Islands (SIB) 47700 ± 800 48970 ± 6009 EE14 Y4 Yakutia, NE Siberia (SIB) >55400 NC EE15 B/ DQ899901 Yakutia, NE Siberia (SIB) 27720 ± 140 30880 ± 1543 EE16 Y2 Irkutsk, Baikal (SIB) 17910 ± 75 21024 ± 1041 EE17 B/ DQ899901 Khroma river, Yakutia (SIB) 19755 ± 80 20006 ± 404 EE19 - New Siberian Islands (SIB) 52000±1500 54373 ± 6396 EE20 J/ DQ899909 Yakutia, NE Siberia (SIB) >62400 NC EE21 G/ DQ899906 Nizhnyaya, C Siberia (SIB) 50500 ± 290 52785 ± 10541 EE26 Y5 (partial) Kyttyk Peninsula (SIB) 36550 ± 290 41025 ± 970 IB133 A/ DQ899900 Gold Run Creek, Yukon (ALA) 12640 ± 75 15016 ± 1463 RB112 A Caribou Creek, Yukon (ALA) n/a - RB74 A Fairbanks Creek, Alaska (ALA) n/a - RB75 A Ester Creek, Alaska (ALA) 12090 ± 80 13822 ± 341 IB134 B/ DQ899901 Gold Hill, Alaska (ALA) 18240 ± 90 21533 ± 1335 IB136 B Hunker -
Cold-Climate Landform Patterns in the Sudetes. Effects of Lithology, Relief and Glacial History
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS CAROLINAE 2000 GEOGRAPHICA, XXXV, SUPPLEMENTUM, PAG. 185–210 Cold-climate landform patterns in the Sudetes. Effects of lithology, relief and glacial history ANDRZEJ TRACZYK, PIOTR MIGOŃ University of Wrocław, Department of Geography, Wrocław, Poland ABSTRACT The Sudetes have the whole range of landforms and deposits, traditionally described as periglacial. These include blockfields and blockslopes, frost-riven cliffs, tors and cryoplanation terraces, solifluction mantles, rock glaciers, talus slopes and patterned ground and loess covers. This paper examines the influence, which lithology and structure, inherited relief and time may have had on their development. It appears that different rock types support different associations of cold climate landforms. Rock glaciers, blockfields and blockstreams develop on massive, well-jointed rocks. Cryogenic terraces, rock steps, patterned ground and heterogenic solifluction mantles are typical for most metamorphic rocks. No distinctive landforms occur on rocks breaking down through microgelivation. The variety of slope form is largely inherited from pre- Pleistocene times and includes convex-concave, stepped, pediment-like, gravitational rectilinear and concave free face-talus slopes. In spite of ubiquitous solifluction and permafrost creep no uniform characteristic ‘periglacial’ slope profile has been created. Mid-Pleistocene trimline has been identified on nunataks in the formerly glaciated part of the Sudetes and in their foreland. Hence it is proposed that rock-cut periglacial relief of the Sudetes is the cumulative effect of many successive cold periods during the Pleistocene and the last glacial period alone was of relatively minor importance. By contrast, slope cover deposits are usually of the Last Glacial age. Key words: cold-climate landforms, the Sudetes 1. -
Mineral Element Stocks in the Yedoma Domain
Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-359 Earth System Preprint. Discussion started: 8 December 2020 Science c Author(s) 2020. CC BY 4.0 License. Open Access Open Data Mineral element stocks in the Yedoma domain: a first assessment in ice-rich permafrost regions Arthur Monhonval1, Sophie Opfergelt1, Elisabeth Mauclet1, Benoît Pereira1, Aubry Vandeuren1, Guido Grosse2,3, Lutz Schirrmeister2, Matthias Fuchs2, Peter Kuhry4, Jens Strauss2 5 1Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 2Permafrost Research Section, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam, Germany 3Institute of Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany 4Department of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden 10 Correspondence to: Arthur Monhonval ([email protected]) Abstract With permafrost thaw, significant amounts of organic carbon (OC) previously stored in frozen deposits are unlocked and 15 become potentially available for microbial mineralization. This is particularly the case in ice-rich regions such as the Yedoma domain. Excess ground ice degradation exposes deep sediments and their OC stocks, but also mineral elements, to biogeochemical processes. Interactions of mineral elements and OC play a crucial role for OC stabilization and the fate of OC upon thaw, and thus regulate carbon dioxide and methane emissions. In addition, some mineral elements are limiting nutrients for plant growth or microbial metabolic activity. A large ongoing effort is to quantify OC stocks and their lability in permafrost 20 regions, but the influence of mineral elements on the fate of OC or on biogeochemical nutrient cycles has received less attention. The reason is that there is a gap of knowledge on the mineral element content in permafrost regions. -
The Main Features of Permafrost in the Laptev Sea Region, Russia – a Review
Permafrost, Phillips, Springman & Arenson (eds) © 2003 Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, ISBN 90 5809 582 7 The main features of permafrost in the Laptev Sea region, Russia – a review H.-W. Hubberten Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and marine Research, Potsdam, Germany N.N. Romanovskii Geocryological Department, Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT: In this paper the concepts of permafrost conditions in the Laptev Sea region are presented with spe- cial attention to the following results: It was shown, that ice-bearing and ice-bonded permafrost exists presently within the coastal lowlands and under the shallow shelf. Open taliks can develop from modern and palaeo river taliks in active fault zones and from lake taliks over fault zones or lithospheric blocks with a higher geothermal heat flux. Ice-bearing and ice-bonded permafrost, as well as the zone of gas hydrate stability, form an impermeable regional shield for groundwater and gases occurring under permafrost. Emission of these gases and discharge of ground- water are possible only in rare open taliks, predominantly controlled by fault tectonics. Ice-bearing and ice-bonded permafrost, as well as the zone of gas hydrate stability in the northern region of the lowlands and in the inner shelf zone, have preserved during at least four Pleistocene climatic and glacio-eustatic cycles. Presently, they are subject to degradation from the bottom under the impact of the geothermal heat flux. 1 INTRODUCTION extremely complex. It consists of tectonic structures of different ages, including several rift zones (Tectonic This paper summarises the results of the studies of Map of Kara and Laptev Sea, 1998; Drachev et al., both offshore and terrestrial permafrost in the Laptev 1999). -
Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (Elevation 8,640 Ft)
1 NCSS Conference 2001 Field Tour -- Colorado Rocky Mountains Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:00 AM Depart Ft. Collins Marriott 8:30 Arrive Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (elevation 8,640 ft) 8:45 "Soil Survey of Rocky Mountain National Park" - Lee Neve, Soil Survey Project Leader, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:00 "Correlation and Classification of the Soils" - Thomas Hahn, Soil Data Quality Specialist, MLRA Office 6, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:15-9:30 "Interpretive Story of the Lawn Lake Flood" - Rocky Mountain National Park Interpretive Staff, National Park Service 10:00 Depart 10:45 Arrive Alpine Visitors Center (elevation 11,796 ft) 11:00 "Research Needs in the National Parks" - Pete Biggam, Soil Scientist, National Park Service 11:05 "Pedology and Biogeochemistry Research in Rocky Mountain National Park" - Dr. Eugene Kelly, Colorado State University 11:25 - 11:40 "Soil Features and Geologic Processes in the Alpine Tundra"- Mike Petersen and Tim Wheeler, Soil Scientists, Natural Resources Conservation Service Box Lunch 12:30 PM Depart 1:00 Arrive Many Parks Curve Interpretive Area (elevation 9,620 ft.) View of Valleys and Glacial Moraines, Photo Opportunity 1:30 Depart 3:00 Arrive Bobcat Gulch Fire Area, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 3:10 "Fire History and Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation Efforts" - Carl Chambers, U. S. Forest Service 3:40 "Involvement and Interaction With the Private Sector"- Todd Boldt; District Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 4:10 "Current Research on the Fire" - Colorado State University 4:45 Depart 6:00 Arrive Ft. Collins Marriott 2 3 Navigator’s Narrative Tim Wheeler Between the Fall River Visitors Center and the Lawn Lake Alluvial Debris Fan: This Park, or open grassy area, is called Horseshoe Park and is the tail end of the Park’s largest valley glacier. -
Geochemistry of Surficial and Ice-Rafted Sediments from The
Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science (1999) 49, 45–59 Article No. ecss.1999.0485, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Geochemistry of Surficial and Ice-rafted Sediments from the Laptev Sea (Siberia) J. A. Ho¨lemanna, M. Schirmacherb, H. Kassensa and A. Prangeb aGEOMAR, Forschungszentrum fu¨r marine Geowissenschaften, Wischhofstr. 1–3, 24148 Kiel, Germany bGKSS, Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Max-Planck-Str., 21502 Geesthacht, Germany Received 20 June 1997 and accepted in revised form 19 February 1999 The Laptev Sea, as a part of the world’s widest continental shelves surrounding the Arctic Ocean, is a key area for understanding the land–ocean interaction in high latitude regions. With a yearly freshwater input of 511 km3, the Lena River—one of the eight major world rivers—has an influencing control over the environment of this Arctic marginal sea, which is ice-covered during most of the year. In this paper, the first measurements are presented of the major and trace element distribution within the <20 ìm grain size fraction of surficial sediments and of particulate matter in new and young ice from the Laptev Sea (Siberian Arctic). The concentration and distribution of major and trace elements have been determined in 51 surficial sediment samples covering the whole Laptev Sea shelf south of the 50 m isobath. Thirty-one samples of particulate matter in newly formed ice were taken during the freeze-up period in 1995. Median concentration levels of heavy metals in surficial sediments (Ni (46 ìgg"1), Cu (26 ìgg"1), Zn (111 ìgg"1) and Pb (21 ìgg"1) are within the concentration range of marine unpolluted sediments. -
Periglacial Processes, Features & Landscape Development 3.1.4.3/4
Periglacial processes, features & landscape development 3.1.4.3/4 Glacial Systems and landscapes What you need to know Where periglacial landscapes are found and what their key characteristics are The range of processes operating in a periglacial landscape How a range of periglacial landforms develop and what their characteristics are The relationship between process, time, landforms and landscapes in periglacial settings Introduction A periglacial environment used to refer to places which were near to or at the edge of ice sheets and glaciers. However, this has now been changed and refers to areas with permafrost that also experience a seasonal change in temperature, occasionally rising above 0 degrees Celsius. But they are characterised by permanently low temperatures. Location of periglacial areas Due to periglacial environments now referring to places with permafrost as well as edges of glaciers, this can account for one third of the Earth’s surface. Far northern and southern hemisphere regions are classed as containing periglacial areas, particularly in the countries of Canada, USA (Alaska) and Russia. Permafrost is where the soil, rock and moisture content below the surface remains permanently frozen throughout the entire year. It can be subdivided into the following: • Continuous (unbroken stretches of permafrost) • extensive discontinuous (predominantly permafrost with localised melts) • sporadic discontinuous (largely thawed ground with permafrost zones) • isolated (discrete pockets of permafrost) • subsea (permafrost occupying sea bed) Whilst permafrost is not needed in the development of all periglacial landforms, most periglacial regions have permafrost beneath them and it can influence the processes that create the landforms. Many locations within SAMPLEextensive discontinuous and sporadic discontinuous permafrost will thaw in the summer months. -
The Contribution of Shore Thermoabrasion to the Laptev Sea Sediment Balance
THE CONTRIBUTION OF SHORE THERMOABRASION TO THE LAPTEV SEA SEDIMENT BALANCE F.E. Are Petersburg State University of Means of Communications, Moskovsky av. 9, St.-Petersburg, 190031, Russia e-mail: [email protected] Abstract A schematic map of Laptev Sea shore dynamics is compiled for the first time, using available published data. It shows the distribution of thermoabrasion shores, mean long-term shore retreat rates, and areas of seabed ero- sion and accretion. The amount of sediment released to the sea from the 85 km Anabar-Olenyok section of the coast is calculated, as an example, at 3.4 Mt/year. These results are compared with published data on sediment transport of rivers running into the Laptev Sea. Estimates of the Lena River discharge range from 12 to 21 Mt/year, of which only 2.1 to 3.5 Mt may reach the sea. The analysis shows that the input of thermoabrasion at mean shoreline retreat rates of 0.7 to 0.9 m/year is at least of the same order as the river input and may great- ly exceed it. Introduction ble to determine the input from shore thermoabrasion offshore more accurately. Thousands of kilometres of Arctic sea coast retreat at rates 2-6 m/year under the action of thermoabrasion1 Maps of shore dynamics are needed to solve this (Are, 1985; Barnes et al., 1991). Tens of square kilome- problem and others related to climate change impacts. tres of Arctic land therefore are consumed by the sea Such maps have been compiled for about 650 km of every year. -
Mineral Element Stocks in the Yedoma Domain: a First Assessment in Ice-Rich Permafrost Regions” by Arthur Monhonval Et Al
Interactive comment on “Mineral element stocks in the Yedoma domain: a first assessment in ice-rich permafrost regions” by Arthur Monhonval et al. Anonymous Referee #2 Received and published: 4 January 2021 RC= Reviewer comment ; AR= Authors response RC: I appreciate the efforts from the authors. I understand the authors created a valuable dataset for the mineral elements in the yedoma regions, and they also tried to calculated the storage of these elements. I have some comments for the authors to improve the quality of the manuscripts. We thank the reviewer for the valuable comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript. We have revised the manuscript accordingly. Please find the details in the responses to the following comments. RC1: When the authors introduce the stocks or storage, it is necessary to clarify the depth or thickness of yedoma. At least, the authors should explain the characteristics of yedoma. This is important because the potential readers will be confused about the depth and height in the dataset. AR : We agree that the choice of the thickness used to upscale to the whole Yedoma domain was not clear in the manuscript. Here, mineral element stocks are compared with C stocks using identical Yedoma domain deposits parameters (including thicknesses) like in Strauss et al., 2013 for deep permafrost carbon pool of the Yedoma region, i.e., a mean thickness of 19.6 meters deep in Yedoma deposits and 5.5 meters deep in Alas deposits. We have revised the manuscript to include that information (L 282):” Thickness used for mineral element stock estimations in Yedoma domain deposits are based on mean profile depths of the sampled Yedoma (n=19) and Alas (n=10) deposits (Table 3; Strauss et al., 2013).