DOCSLIB.ORG

Blockchain 2.0: What’S in Store for the Two Ends—Semiconductors (Sup- Pliers) and Industrials (Consumers)?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blockchain 2.0: What’S in Store for the Two Ends—Semiconductors (Sup- Pliers) and Industrials (Consumers)? Blockchain 2.0: What’s in store for the two ends—semiconductors (sup- pliers) and industrials (consumers)? Ten years after blockchain’s inception, it is presenting new opportunities for both suppliers, such as semiconductor companies, and consumers, such as industrials. Gaurav Batra, Rémy Olson, Shilpi Pathak, Nick Santhanam, and Harish Soundararajan JANUARY 2019 • ADVANCED ELECTRONICS PRACTICE © Imaginima/Getty Images Blockchain is best known as a sophisticated and cryptocurrency because this could increase demand somewhat mysterious technology that allows for chips. cryptocurrencies to change hands online without assistance from banks or other intermediaries. Both industrial and semiconductor players will But in recent years, it has also been promoted as need a solid understanding of specific blockchain- the solution to business issues ranging from fraud enabled use cases and the market landscape to management to supply-chain monitoring to iden- succeed in the new era. To assist them, this article tity verification. Despite the hype, however, block- reviews the changing market and then focuses on chain’s use in business is still largely theoretical. specific strategies for capturing value. One caveat: A few pioneers in retail and other sectors are all information in this article reflects data available exploring blockchain business applications as of December 2018. Cryptocurrency values related to supply-chain management and other fluctuate widely, so the numbers reported, including processes, but most are reluctant to proceed fur- those for market capitalization, may not reflect the ther because of high costs, unclear returns, and most recent data. Blockchain technology and the technical difficulties. competitive landscape are also evolving rapidly, and there may have been changes since publication. But we may now be at a transition point between Blockchain 1.0 and Blockchain 2.0. In the new era, Blockchain 1.0: The cryptocurrency era blockchain-enabled cryptocurrency applications It is not surprising that many people conflate will likely cede their prominence to blockchain blockchain with Bitcoin, the first and most dominant business applications that can potentially increase cryptocurrency. Until recently, the vast majority efficiency and reduce costs. These applications will of blockchain applications involved enabling be in a good position to gain steam since many large cryptocurrency transactions. Around 2014, however, tech companies may soon begin offering blockchain private companies began investigating the use of as a service (BaaS). Rather than just providing blockchain for other business applications. Since the hardware layer, as they’ve traditionally done, most of these players are still at the pilot stage, it is these companies will extend their services up the fair to say that blockchain-enabled cryptocurrency technology stack to blockchain platforms and tools. has been the focus of the Blockchain 1.0 era. As blockchain deployment becomes less complex and expensive, companies that have sat on the The emergence of cryptocurrencies sidelines may now be willing to take the plunge. (See Bitcoin hit the market in 2009 as an open-source sidebar, “What advantages do blockchain business software application. It was first used in a commer- applications offer?”) cial transaction in 2010, when two pizzas were bought for 10,000 bitcoin (under $10 then, but about Will blockchain business applications continue to $35 million as of December 2018). With no central grow and finally validate their promise? Industrial authority or server to verify transactions, the public companies, which were largely on the sidelines was initially skeptical about Bitcoin and reluctant during the Blockchain 1.0 era, want an answer to to use it. Beginning in 2014, however, Bitcoin has this question because they could find opportunities experienced a meteoric increase in user base, brand- to deploy business applications that improve name recognition, and transaction volume. Its value their bottom line. Semiconductor companies are is extremely volatile, however, and it has declined also interested in the growth of both blockchain sharply from its late 2017 peak of over $19,000. business applications and blockchain-enabled 2 Blockchain 2.0: What’s in store for the two ends—semiconductors (suppliers) and industrials (consumers)? The past two years have seen the most growth in Ripple). Of all the alternative cryptocurrency blockchain-enabled cryptocurrencies, with the networks, Ethereum is most popular. It is an number increasing from 69 in 2016 to more than open-source platform that allows users to build 1,500 in 2018. Even though Bitcoin’s value has and launch decentralized applications, including decreased this year, an influx of initial coin offerings cryptocurrencies or digital ledgers. Users must spend (ICOs) has increased the market capitalization for a specific digital currency, Ether, to run applications cryptocurrencies (Exhibit 1). on Ethereum. Ether can also serve as an alternative to regular money, but its primary purpose is to Universal 2019 Many of the additional currencies—also called facilitate Ethereum operations. Blockchain 2.0: What's in store for industrial and semiconductor players? “altcoins”— were created to address certain gaps or Exhibit 1 of 3 inefficiencies with Bitcoin, and they are available Together, the market capitalization of a select set of through various networks. Popular altcoins major cryptocurrencies was about $150 billion in include Dash, Litecoin, and XRP (offered through December 2018, with Bitcoin and the four leading Exhibit 1 The number of active cryptocurrencies and their market capitalization has soared. Cryptocurrencies active in the 1,500+ Cryptocurrency market 177 market, number capitalization,1 $ billion ~150 392 11 69 7 4 8 29 33 2 2013 2018 2013 2018 1 This is the market capitalization for a select bundle of cryptocurrencies. Bundle includes: Bitcoin, Dash, Ethereum, Litecoin, Ripple, and several other altcoins. Figures are as of Dec 11, 2018. Source: McKinsey analysis Blockchain 2.0: What’s in store for the two ends—semiconductors (suppliers) and industrials (consumers)? 3 altcoins representing about 75 percent of this value. About 50 to 60 percent of companies that Bitcoin’s market capitalization of about $60 billion manufacture ASICs for Bitcoin transactions are was the highest. based in the Greater China region (Exhibit 2). (Some of these began creating ASICs for cryptocurrency Transaction verification mining before Bitcoin entered the market in The method used to verify transactions varies by 2008, since this was already viewed as a potential cryptocurrency. With Bitcoin, the first participant, growth area.) BitMain Technologies, a China- or “miner,” to validate a transaction and add a new based company, supplied 70 to 80 percent of the block of data to the digital ledger will receive a cryptocurrency ASICs in 2017. Its customers certain number of tokens as a reward. Under this typically use “crypto rigs”—basically, multiple model, which is referred to as a proof-of-work (PoW) ASICs working together—to optimize compute speed. system, miners have an incentive to act quickly. By conservative estimates, BitMain Technologies But validating a transaction doesn’t simply involve has a gross margin of 65 to 75 percent and an verifying that Bitcoin has been transferred from one operating margin of 55 to 65 percent—equivalent to account to another. Instead, a miner has to answer a $3 billion to $4 billion in 2017. That figure is roughly cryptographic question by correctly identifying an the same as the profit margin for NVIDIA, which has alphanumeric series associated with the transaction. been in business for 20 years longer. This activity requires a lot of trial and error, making the hash rate—the compute speed at which an opera- Although most major cryptocurrencies now reward tion is completed—extremely important with Bitcoin. miners with high compute speed, some have taken steps to prevent large mining pools with crypto In the beginning, many individuals mined Bitcoin rigs from dominating the market. For instance, as a hobby. But as interest in cryptocurrencies Ethash, the hashing algorithm that Ethereum grew, the number and size of Bitcoin miners soared, uses, is designed to be ASIC resistant—and that necessitating more sophisticated hardware and means miners must fetch random data and compute more intense computing power. This shift has randomly selected transactions to solve their favored the rise of large mining pools. Many of cryptographic questions. Both activities require these, including AntPool and BTC.COM, are based frequent access to memory, which ASICs alone won’t in China. The top five mining pools account for 70 to provide. Ethereum miners primarily rely on a system 85 percent of the overall Bitcoin network’s collective that utilizes a GPU in combination with memory. hash rate, or computing power. Blockchain 2.0: Uncertainty about Hardware for cryptocurrency players cryptocurrencies and the emergence of In the early day of cryptocurrency, amateur business applications hobbyists relied on central processing units (CPUs) The Blockchain 2.0 era will likely usher in many to optimize compute performance. When the changes. The cryptocurrency market could become Bitcoin network began expanding around 2010, more diverse if Bitcoin continues to decrease in price, the graphics-processing unit (GPU) replaced the since ICOs may see the situation as an opportunity CPU as the accelerator of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peer Co-Movement in Crypto Markets
    Peer Co-Movement in Crypto Markets G. Schwenkler and H. Zheng∗ February 4, 2021y Abstract We show that peer linkages induce significant price co-movement in crypto markets in excess of common risk factors and correlated demand shocks. When large abnormal return shocks hit one crypto, its peers experience unusually large abnormal returns of the opposite sign. These effects are primarily concentrated among smaller peers and revert after several weeks, resulting in predictable returns. We develop trading strategies that exploit this rever- sal, and show that they are profitable even after accounting for trading fees and frictions. We establish our results by identifying crypto peers through co-mentions in online news using novel natural language processing technologies. Keywords: Cryptocurrencies, peers, co-movement, competition, natural language pro- cessing. JEL codes: G12, G14, C82. ∗Schwenkler is at the Department of Finance, Santa Clara University Leavey School of Business. Zheng is at the Department of Finance, Boston University Questrom School of Business. Schwenkler is corresponding author. Email: [email protected], web: http://www.gustavo-schwenkler.com. yThis is a revision of a previous paper by the two authors called \Competition or Contagion: Evidence from Cryptocurrency Markets." We are grateful to Jawad Addoum (discussant), Daniele Bianchi (discussant), Will Cong, Tony Cookson, Sanjiv Das, Seoyoung Kim, Andreas Neuhierl, Farzad Saidi, and Antoinette Schoar, seminar participants at Boston University and the Society for Financial Econometrics, and the participants at the 2020 Finance in the Cloud III Virtual Conference, the 2020 MFA Annual Meeting, the 3rd UWA Blockchain, Cryptocurrency and FinTech Conference, and the 2020 INFORMS Annual Meeting for useful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • YEUNG-DOCUMENT-2019.Pdf (478.1Kb)
    Useful Computation on the Block Chain The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Yeung, Fuk. 2019. Useful Computation on the Block Chain. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37364565 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA 111 Useful Computation on the Block Chain Fuk Yeung A Thesis in the Field of Information Technology for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University November 2019 Copyright 2019 [Fuk Yeung] Abstract The recent growth of blockchain technology and its usage has increased the size of cryptocurrency networks. However, this increase has come at the cost of high energy consumption due to the processing power needed to maintain large cryptocurrency networks. In the largest networks, this processing power is attributed to wasted computations centered around solving a Proof of Work algorithm. There have been several attempts to address this problem and it is an area of continuing improvement. We will present a summary of proposed solutions as well as an in-depth look at a promising alternative algorithm known as Proof of Useful Work. This solution will redirect wasted computation towards useful work. We will show that this is a viable alternative to Proof of Work. Dedication Thank you to everyone who has supported me throughout the process of writing this piece.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain – Operator Opportunities Version 1.0 July 2018
    Blockchain – Operator Opportunities Version 1.0 July 2018 About the GSMA The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators worldwide, uniting more than 750 operators with over 350 companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset and device makers, software companies, equipment providers and internet companies, as well as organisations in adjacent industry sectors. The GSMA also produces the industry-leading MWC events held annually in Barcelona, Los Angeles and Shanghai, as well as the Mobile 360 Series of regional conferences. For more information, please visit the GSMA corporate website at www.gsma.com. Follow the GSMA on Twitter: @GSMA. About the GSMA Internet Group The GSMA Internet Group (IG) is the key working group which researches, analyses and measures the potential opportunities and impacts of new web and internet technologies on mobile operator networks and platforms. We maintain the most up-to-date knowledge base of new internet and web innovations through intelligence gathering of available global research and active participation in key Standards organisations. www.gsma.com/workinggroups Authors: Peter Ajn Vanleeuwen, KPN Douwe van de Ruit, KPN Contributors: Dan Druta, AT&T Axel Nennker, Deutsche Telecom Shamit Bhat, GSMA Rinze Cats, KPN Kaissar Jabr, Monty Holding Page 2 of 36 Table of Contents Blockchain – Operator Opportunities ............................................................................ 1 Version 1.0 ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beauty Is Not in the Eye of the Beholder
    Insight Consumer and Wealth Management Digital Assets: Beauty Is Not in the Eye of the Beholder Parsing the Beauty from the Beast. Investment Strategy Group | June 2021 Sharmin Mossavar-Rahmani Chief Investment Officer Investment Strategy Group Goldman Sachs The co-authors give special thanks to: Farshid Asl Managing Director Matheus Dibo Shahz Khatri Vice President Vice President Brett Nelson Managing Director Michael Murdoch Vice President Jakub Duda Shep Moore-Berg Harm Zebregs Vice President Vice President Vice President Shivani Gupta Analyst Oussama Fatri Yousra Zerouali Vice President Analyst ISG material represents the views of ISG in Consumer and Wealth Management (“CWM”) of GS. It is not financial research or a product of GS Global Investment Research (“GIR”) and may vary significantly from those expressed by individual portfolio management teams within CWM, or other groups at Goldman Sachs. 2021 INSIGHT Dear Clients, There has been enormous change in the world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology since we first wrote about it in 2017. The number of cryptocurrencies has increased from about 2,000, with a market capitalization of over $200 billion in late 2017, to over 8,000, with a market capitalization of about $1.6 trillion. For context, the market capitalization of global equities is about $110 trillion, that of the S&P 500 stocks is $35 trillion and that of US Treasuries is $22 trillion. Reported trading volume in cryptocurrencies, as represented by the two largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, has increased sixfold, from an estimated $6.8 billion per day in late 2017 to $48.6 billion per day in May 2021.1 This data is based on what is called “clean data” from Coin Metrics; the total reported trading volume is significantly higher, but much of it is artificially inflated.2,3 For context, trading volume on US equity exchanges doubled over the same period.
    [Show full text]
  • Pwc I 2Nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report
    2nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report April 2020 2 PwC I 2nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report Dear Clients and Friends, We are proud to launch the 2nd edition of our Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report. We hope that the market colour and insights from this report will be useful data points. We will continue to publish this report twice a year to enable you to monitor the ongoing trends in the crypto ecosystem. PwC has put together a “one stop shop” offering, focused on crypto services across our various lines of services in over 25 jurisdictions, including the most active crypto jurisdictions. Our goal is to service your needs in the best possible way leveraging the PwC network and allowing you to make your project a success. Our crypto clients include crypto exchanges, crypto investors, crypto asset managers, ICOs/IEOs/STOs/stable and asset backed tokens, traditional financial institutions entering the crypto space as well as governments, central banks, regulators and other policy makers looking at the crypto ecosystem. As part of our “one stop shop” offering, we provide an entire range of services to the crypto ecosystem including strategy, legal, regulatory, accounting, tax, governance, risk assurance, audit, cybersecurity, M&A advisory as well as capital raising. More details are available on our global crypto page as well as at the back of this report. 2nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report April 2020 PwC 2 3 PwC I 2nd Global Crypto M&A and Fundraising Report 5 Key takeaways when comparing 2018 vs 2019 There
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf [2] Popper, N
    Journal of Mathematical Finance, 2021, 11, 495-511 https://www.scirp.org/journal/jmf ISSN Online: 2162-2442 ISSN Print: 2162-2434 The Investors’ Behavior towards the Relationship between Bitcoin, Litcoin, Dash Coins, and Gold: A Portfolio Modeling Approach Asma Maghrebi, Fathi Abid Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Sfax, Tunisia How to cite this paper: Maghrebi, A. and Abstract Abid, F. (2021) The Investors’ Behavior towards the Relationship between Bitcoin, This study considers a market-based economy that is composed of two asset Litcoin, Dash Coins, and Gold: A Portfolio classes: one is a digital, cryptocurrency, and the other is real, gold. We dem- Modeling Approach. Journal of Mathemat- onstrated that coins like (BTC, LTC, and DASH) can substitute a traditional ical Finance, 11, 495-511. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmf.2021.113028 safe haven “gold” in an intertemporal investment portfolio to become a new form of safe haven. The cryptocurrency follows a Jump-diffusion process. How- Received: June 29, 2021 ever, gold prices follow an Ornstein-Uhlenbek process to characterize the Accepted: August 16, 2021 stochastic nature of the market. The stochastic optimal control approach, Published: August 19, 2021 combined with the strategic asset allocation and the intertemporal utility Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and theory, are used through the derivation of a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Scientific Research Publishing Inc. equation to determine an explicit solution of the optimal allocation problem This work is licensed under the Creative for investors with CRRA utility function. We considered the Gamma Lévy Commons Attribution International process to solve the optimization problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Consensus: Immutable Agreement for the Internet of Value
    Consensus Immutable agreement for the Internet of value kpmg.com Seizing opportunity – blockchain and beyond Contents ack in early 2009, the high-profile journey of the first About the authors Bitcoin overshadowed the ingenuity of its underlying The terms 1 Seizing opportunity – Blockchain and beyond Blockchain, distributed ledgers, Sigrid Seibold technology, the blockchain protocol. These days, however, B and consensus mechanisms are Principal, Advisory Capital 2 The basics behind blockchain blockchain is garnering its own share of headlines. Inspired by sometimes used interchangeably. Markets, KPMG LLP 3 Consensus the original blockchain protocol, a variety of new consensus For purposes of this paper, we use Sigrid looks back at 25 years mechanisms and new types of distributed ledger technologies the following definitions: of working in the banking 10 Key observations are continuing to emerge. As innovation accelerates, proponents and capital markets industry. 14 Is blockchain right for your organization Blockchain: A type of distributed She primarily focuses on are eagerly seeking solutions that may work within the current ledger database that maintains a the major investment banks, leveraging her areas of 15 Maneuvering the road ahead regulatory confines of financial services and other industries. continuously growing list of transaction specialization, such as data management and digital 17 Appendix 1: Key terminology records ordered into blocks with various technologies, including financial and blockchain. As a As a result, more and more financial services companies and venture capital (VC) firms protections against tampering and respected industry thought leader, she has published 19 Appendix 2: Consensus mechanism valuation are looking closely at blockchains and other distributed ledgers, and with good reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetric Proof-Of-Work Based on the Generalized Birthday Problem
    Equihash: Asymmetric Proof-of-Work Based on the Generalized Birthday Problem Alex Biryukov Dmitry Khovratovich University of Luxembourg University of Luxembourg [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—The proof-of-work is a central concept in modern Long before the rise of Bitcoin it was realized [20] that cryptocurrencies and denial-of-service protection tools, but the the dedicated hardware can produce a proof-of-work much requirement for fast verification so far made it an easy prey for faster and cheaper than a regular desktop or laptop. Thus the GPU-, ASIC-, and botnet-equipped users. The attempts to rely on users equipped with such hardware have an advantage over memory-intensive computations in order to remedy the disparity others, which eventually led the Bitcoin mining to concentrate between architectures have resulted in slow or broken schemes. in a few hardware farms of enormous size and high electricity In this paper we solve this open problem and show how to consumption. An advantage of the same order of magnitude construct an asymmetric proof-of-work (PoW) based on a compu- is given to “owners” of large botnets, which nowadays often tationally hard problem, which requires a lot of memory to gen- accommodate hundreds of thousands of machines. For prac- erate a proof (called ”memory-hardness” feature) but is instant tical DoS protection, this means that the early TLS puzzle to verify. Our primary proposal Equihash is a PoW based on the schemes [8], [17] are no longer effective against the most generalized birthday problem and enhanced Wagner’s algorithm powerful adversaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Coin Offerings: Financing Growth with Cryptocurrency Token
    Initial Coin Offerings: Financing Growth with Cryptocurrency Token Sales Sabrina T. Howell, Marina Niessner, and David Yermack⇤ June 21, 2018 Abstract Initial coin offerings (ICOs) are sales of blockchain-based digital tokens associated with specific platforms or assets. Since 2014 ICOs have emerged as a new financing instrument, with some parallels to IPOs, venture capital, and pre-sale crowdfunding. We examine the relationship between issuer characteristics and measures of success, with a focus on liquidity, using 453 ICOs that collectively raise $5.7 billion. We also employ propriety transaction data in a case study of Filecoin, one of the most successful ICOs. We find that liquidity and trading volume are higher when issuers offer voluntary disclosure, credibly commit to the project, and signal quality. s s ss s ss ss ss s ⇤NYU Stern and NBER; Yale SOM; NYU Stern, ECGI and NBER. Email: [email protected]. For helpful comments, we are grateful to Bruno Biais, Darrell Duffie, seminar participants at the OECD Paris Workshop on Digital Financial Assets, Erasmus University, and the Swedish House of Finance. We thank Protocol Labs and particularly Evan Miyazono and Juan Benet for providing data. Sabrina Howell thanks the Kauffman Foundation for financial support. We are also grateful to all of our research assistants, especially Jae Hyung (Fred) Kim. Part of this paper was written while David Yermack was a visiting professor at Erasmus University Rotterdam. 1Introduction Initial coin offerings (ICOs) may be a significant innovation in entrepreneurial finance. In an ICO, a blockchain-based venture raises capital by selling cryptographically secured digital assets, usually called “tokens.” These ventures often resemble the startups that conventionally finance themselves with angel or venture capital (VC) investment, though there are many scams, jokes, and tokens that have nothing to do with a new product or business.
    [Show full text]
  • Piecework: Generalized Outsourcing Control for Proofs of Work
    (Short Paper): PieceWork: Generalized Outsourcing Control for Proofs of Work Philip Daian1, Ittay Eyal1, Ari Juels2, and Emin G¨unSirer1 1 Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, [email protected],[email protected],[email protected] 2 Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute, Cornell Tech [email protected] Abstract. Most prominent cryptocurrencies utilize proof of work (PoW) to secure their operation, yet PoW suffers from two key undesirable prop- erties. First, the work done is generally wasted, not useful for anything but the gleaned security of the cryptocurrency. Second, PoW is natu- rally outsourceable, leading to inegalitarian concentration of power in the hands of few so-called pools that command large portions of the system's computation power. We introduce a general approach to constructing PoW called PieceWork that tackles both issues. In essence, PieceWork allows for a configurable fraction of PoW computation to be outsourced to workers. Its controlled outsourcing allows for reusing the work towards additional goals such as spam prevention and DoS mitigation, thereby reducing PoW waste. Meanwhile, PieceWork can be tuned to prevent excessive outsourcing. Doing so causes pool operation to be significantly more costly than today. This disincentivizes aggregation of work in mining pools. 1 Introduction Distributed cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin [18] rely on the equivalence \com- putation = money." To generate a batch of coins, clients in a distributed cryp- tocurrency system perform an operation called mining. Mining requires solving a computationally intensive problem involving repeated cryptographic hashing. Such problem and its solution is called a Proof of Work (PoW) [11]. As currently designed, nearly all PoWs suffer from one of two drawbacks (or both, as in Bitcoin).
    [Show full text]
  • PWC and Elwood
    2020 Crypto Hedge Fund Report Contents Introduction to Crypto Hedge Fund Report 3 Key Takeaways 4 Survey Data 5 Investment Data 6 Strategy Insights 6 Market Analysis 7 Assets Under Management (AuM) 8 Fund performance 9 Fees 10 Cryptocurrencies 11 Derivatives and Leverage 12 Non-Investment Data 13 Team Expertise 13 Custody and Counterparty Risk 15 Governance 16 Valuation and Fund Administration 16 Liquidity and Lock-ups 17 Legal and Regulatory 18 Tax 19 Survey Respondents 20 About PwC & Elwood 21 Introduction to Crypto Hedge Fund report In this report we provide an overview of the global crypto hedge fund landscape and offer insights into both quantitative elements (such as liquidity terms, trading of cryptocurrencies and performance) and qualitative aspects, such as best practice with respect to custody and governance. By sharing these insights with the broader crypto industry, our goal is to encourage the adoption of sound practices by market participants as the ecosystem matures. The data contained in this report comes from research that was conducted in Q1 2020 across the largest global crypto hedge funds by assets under management (AuM). This report specifically focuses on crypto hedge funds and excludes data from crypto index/tracking/passive funds and crypto venture capital funds. 3 | 2020 Crypto Hedge Fund Report Key Takeaways: Size of the Market and AuM: Performance and Fees: • We estimate that the total AuM of crypto hedge funds • The median crypto hedge fund returned +30% in 2019 (vs - globally increased to over US$2 billion in 2019 from US$1 46% in 2018). billion the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Consent Order: HDR Global Trading Limited, Et Al
    Case 1:20-cv-08132-MKV Document 62 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING DOC #: COMMISSION, DATE FILED: 8/10/2021 Plaintiff v. Case No. 1:20-cv-08132 HDR GLOBAL TRADING LIMITED, 100x Hon. Mary Kay Vyskocil HOLDINGS LIMITED, ABS GLOBAL TRADING LIMITED, SHINE EFFORT INC LIMITED, HDR GLOBAL SERVICES (BERMUDA) LIMITED, ARTHUR HAYES, BENJAMIN DELO, and SAMUEL REED, Defendants CONSENT ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY, AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS HDR GLOBAL TRADING LIMITED, 100x HOLDINGS LIMITED, SHINE EFFORT INC LIMITED, and HDR GLOBAL SERVICES (BERMUDA) LIMITED I. INTRODUCTION On October 1, 2020, Plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) filed a Complaint against Defendants HDR Global Trading Limited (“HDR”), 100x Holdings Limited (100x”), ABS Global Trading Limited (“ABS”), Shine Effort Inc Limited (“Shine”), and HDR Global Services (Bermuda) Limited (“HDR Services”), all doing business as “BitMEX” (collectively “BitMEX”) as well as BitMEX’s co-founders Arthur Hayes (“Hayes”), Benjamin Delo (“Delo”), and Samuel Reed (“Reed”), (collectively “Defendants”), seeking injunctive and other equitable relief, as well as the imposition of civil penalties, for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1–26 (2018), and the Case 1:20-cv-08132-MKV Document 62 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 22 Commission’s Regulations (“Regulations”) promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. pts. 1–190 (2020). (“Complaint,” ECF No. 1.)1 II. CONSENTS AND AGREEMENTS To effect settlement of all charges alleged in the Complaint against Defendants HDR, 100x, ABS, Shine, and HDR Services (“Settling Defendants”) without a trial on the merits or any further judicial proceedings, Settling Defendants: 1.
    [Show full text]