DOCSLIB.ORG

KLP Annual Report 2012 Key Figures 2012 Development Over the Last 5 Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KLP Annual Report 2012 Key Figures 2012 Development Over the Last 5 Years KLP annual report 2012 Key figures 2012 Development over the last 5 years NOK millions KLP Group 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Pre-tax income 1 002 653 515 776 348 Total assets 331 783 291 784 271 736 258 549 205 264 Owners' equity 13 547 12 064 10 749 9 721 8 429 Capital adequacy ratio 10,3 % 10,9 % 11,5 % 12,0 % 13,5 % Number of employees 808 775 762 741 683 Kommunal Landspensjonskasse 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Pre-tax income 775 705 563 738 397 Premium income (without premium reserves transferred in) 27 477 21 641 20 291 18 583 21 993 Net transfers in/out of premium reserves and other funds 1 401 -199 -1 335 -1 784 -2 707 Income to customers 5 455 3 594 4 651 6 636 -1 802 In 2012 KLP hosted an internal photo contest where the staff were to visualize one of KLP’s values. of which supplementary reserves - 2 143 2 070 4 211 -3 705 of which to premium fund 2 365 1 451 2 581 2 425 1 903 Open, Clear, Responsible and Committed. Olav Storm, photographer, was head of the jury. Insurance funds 275 843 243 439 227 533 204 486 180 076 We present some of the contributions in this annual report. Total assets 299 671 261 746 244 194 223 863 201 896 Owners' equity 13 390 11 941 10 647 9 642 8 437 Solvency capital 44 132 36 190 33 338 25 329 17 882 Solvency capital measured against insurance funds with interest guarantee 17,4 % 16,0 % 15,9 % 13,1 % 9,9 % Capital adequacy ratio 10,6 % 11,5 % 12,0 % 12,6 % 14,6 % Solvency margin ratio 233,2 % 243,5 % 230,6 % 221,5 % 195,5 % Return on the common portfolio: 0,0 % 0,0 % 0,0 % 0,0 % 0,0 % - book return 5,0 % 4,5 % 5,1 % 6,4 % 1,0 % - value-adjusted return 6,7 % 3,2 % 7,5 % 7,7 % -3,0 % - value-adjusted return including VAT on assets recognized at amortized cost 7,5 % 3,9 % 7,4 % 7,6 % -1,7 % Return investment options portfolio 7,5 % 2,2 % 8,6 % 9,2 % n/a Insurance-related administration costs measured against average customer funds 0,32 % 0,34 % 0,34 % 0,33 % 0,36 % Number of premium-paying members 316 298 309 333 304 985 304 651 299 408 Number of pensioners 182 562 172 272 163 701 155 306 149 833 Number of employees 477 460 449 427 407 KLP Bedriftspensjon AS 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Pre-tax income -25 -24 -17 -13 -10 Premium income (without premium reserves transferred in) 126 93 52 25 24 Net inward/outward transfer of premium reserves 216 182 89 21 32 Income to customers 15 16 10 12 11 PHOTO ANDERS EIDSNES PHOTO SVEIN MAGNE FURULUND Total assets 1 317 904 614 436 360 Capital adequacy ratio 9,6 % 13,9 % 19,6 % 18,9 % 21,7 % KLP Skadeforsikring AS 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Pre-tax income 106 25 70 217 35 Annual premium 750 650 631 609 574 Combined ratio 107,8 % 118,1 % 121,9 % 95,5 % 97,3 % Capital adequacy ratio 34,1 % 31,8 % 32,0 % 33,6 % 39,3 % KLP Banken Konsern 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Pre-tax income 83 -62 36 -39 n/a Deposits 2 946 1 840 1 026 36 n/a Lending 21 875 28 416 26 320 33 097 n/a Capital adequacy ratio 20,1 % 14,4 % 26,7 % 113,0 % n/a KLP Kapitalforvaltning AS and KLP Fondsforvaltning AS 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 Pre-tax income 21 26 19 12 63 Assets for management in total 252 037 215 915 196 046 176 609 160 192 Assets for management from external customers 21 153 13 650 14 132 11 343 7 580 Contents Key figures see cover Solid result for the year for KLP 5 Important events in i 2012 6 This is KLP 11 KLP pensions and life insurance 17 Non-life insuranse 20 Asset and Fund management 22 Property 24 Banking and municipal lending 26 Corporate governance 28 Annual report of the Board of Directors for 2012 37 Group Accounts Income statement 53 Financial position statement 54-55 Schedule of changes in owners equity 56 Statement of cash flows 57 Notes Group 58–108 COVER PHOTO ANNE WESTAD PHOTO ELI BLEIE MUNKELIEN Non-financial Accounts 114 Audit report, non-financial Accounts 117 Accounts KLP Income statement 122-123 Financial position statement 124-125 Schedule of changes in owners equity 126 Statement of cash flows 127 Notes KLP 128-192 Audit report 196 Declarations 199-203 Elected representatives 204 4 annUAL RepORT 2012 5 Solid result for the year for KLP KLP delivers good results for 2012. The Company is demonstrating good returns, low costs and a large inflow of new customers. We are delighted that, for the fourth consecutive year, KLP has the best value-adjusted return of the companies competing in the public sector occupational pensions market. Notwithstanding sometimes uneasy financial markets and low inte- which the securities adjustment fund represented NOK 9.3 billion. rest rates, KLP can point to a good return for 2012. Value-adjusted The Company’s solvency is strong in relation to the requirements and book returns for 2012 ended at 6.7 per cent and 5.0 per cent of the authorities. respectively. Shares, short-term bonds and property are the most important contributors to the good return. The expected longevity of the population is increasing. This means that pensions will be paid out over longer periods and entails a need KLP did extremely well in last autumn’s public sector occupational to strengthen the premium reserve. From 2012 we will therefore pension competitive tendering rounds. From New Year, KLP has set aside NOK 3.0 billion to strengthen these reserves at the same gained 14 new local government customers. In addition the three time as we transfer NOK 2.3 billion to our customers’ premium fund. KLP local government administrations that went out to tender chose to continue their customer relationship with the Company. From Taking corporate social responsibility is an important part of KLP’s the New Year KLP will thus gain a net inflow of customer assets identity. Increased market share and increased pension funds to of almost NOK 6 billion and 28,000 new members of the pension be managed are also accompanied by increased responsibility. In scheme. This is KLP’s best transfer result for several decades, and 2013 it is 10 years since KLP signed the UN Global Compact, as a recognition of KLP as a competitive and cost-effective pension a universal standard for corporate social responsibility. We shall provider. continue to work to protect human rights, employee rights and the environment, as well as against corruption. All business areas are showing good growth and good results. It is particularly pleasing to see that so many of our owners’ employees We shall be our owners’ best partner for the days to come. There- have become customers in banking and non-life insurance, and that fore our owners’ needs will always stand central and our activities they are very pleased both with the service and the terms and con- will be aimed at strengthening their finances, facilitating their day- PHOTO: Olav Storm ditions. We shall continue our work to offer exactly this, as support to-day life and strengthening them as employers. to our owners in the battle to retain and attract capable employees. GROUP CEO SVERRE THORNES KLP has customers and owners who prioritise solvency and a long- With total assets in excess of NOK 330 billion, KLP is Norway’s lar- term approach to asset management. With good financial strength gest life insurance company, a factor that grants us the economies and with employees who are both competent and committed, we of scale to the benefit of our customers and owners in the days to have the best prerequisites to continue achieving good results for come. With an increased number of pensioners and increasing need our customers and owners into the future. for information about pensions, there is a great deal of investment in IT systems, processes and customer service to accommodate this growth efficiently and effectively. KLP continues to have excellent financial strength. At the end of the fourth quarter KLP had total solvency capital of NOK 44.1 billion, corresponding to 17.4 per cent of insurance funds, and in Sverre Thornes, Group CEO IMPORtant EVents in 2012 7 JANUAry FEbrUAry MARCH AprIL mAY JUNE Important events in 2012 PHOTO ALETTE KROGDAHL STRAMME PHOTO KARI JACOBSEN PHOTO LIV NÆRSTAD PHOTO MARIANN KILLI BJØLVERUD JANUARY FEBRUARY the theme was «Norwegian local authorities in JULy AUGUST SEPTEmbEr OCTOBEr NOVEmbEr DECEmbER Delighted winners of KLP’s working en- Good results Despite troubled financial mar- a troubled world». vironment prize KLP awarded two prizes kets KLP can point to good results in 2011. this year, each of NOK 150,000. Trond Gun- Total financial returns were finalized at NOK Credit card launch KLP Banken launched nar Skillingstad from Nord-Trøndelag Health 9.9 billion and the Company enters 2012 with its credit card for members. The card gives Enterprise was acclaimed the winner of KLP’s strong buffers. you the opportunity to split up payment on Working Environment Prize ”Enthusiast of the larger purchases and gives you up to 45 days’ year 2011”. Rissa Municipality won the prize Customer pages at www.klp.no.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Particle Separation
    COMPACT, EFFICIENT PARTICLE SEPARATION www.krugerkaldnes.no Unique separation equipment The MUSLING® flotation equipment was developed during the 1980’s originally for removing fat and oil from fish-processing sewage outlets. Now, after more than 20 years experience, the MUSLING® has become synonymous with the treatment for both industrial and communal sewage systems. MUSLING® continually separates particles from all types of flowing liquids. Its unique hydraulic design produces a maximum flotation effect. The MUSLING® flotation efficiency is the result of a hydraulic action that influences the velocity and direction of the liquid so that particle matter becomes separated at the surface. High capacity One of the many advantages of the MUSLING® is that it can handle a large flow of liquid in a relatively small space. It can separate particle matter at surface speeds of up to 15 m/h. The result - equipment that is compact, efficient and extremely cost- effective The MUSLING® can be used for the treatment of all forms of liquid-flow systems including traditional sewage cleaning, drinking water treatment, industrial outlet separation and recycling plants where products can be extracted and returned to the production process. An environmental advantage The MUSLING® can be used as a pure mechanical plant for the removal of fat and oils. On the other hand it can be part of a chemical cleaning system or a biological treatment process. The common factor here is that the MUSLING® is always the particle-removal element. An outside influence on the separation process The flotation particle separation process of is often dependent on what is called “dispersion”.
    [Show full text]
  • Hva Er Viktig for Deg-Dagen 6. Juni 2018
    1 Summary ‘What matters to you?’ day in Norway 2019 ks.no/pasientforlop 27.06.2019 2 Background • It started in Norway in 2014. Participants in Gode pasientforløp (Learning networks for whole, coordinated and safe pathways in the municipalities) were very positive about the ‘ What matters to you? ’ message, and it was decided to conduct such a day in Norway. • Gode pasientforløp is carried out by KS (The Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities) in collaboration with NIPH (the Norwegian Institute of Public Health). • An article in the New England journal of Medicine i 2012 introduced the question ‘What matters to you?’ • One of the goals in Gode pasientforløp is to strengthen the role of the user in improvement of patient pathways. 27.06.2019 3 Buttons • KS has distributed 60,605 buttons to 172 municipalities (of a total of 422), including all 15 districts in Oslo in 2019 • 31 hospitals have also ordered buttons and celebrated the day • A total of approx. 200,000 buttons has been distributed since 2014 The first buttons New design in 2017 Norway has two written standard, and in 2018 we also offered buttons in Nynorsk as well as in Sami language. 27.06.2019 4 The Ministry of Health and Care Services produced their own film 27.06.2019 5 ‘What matters to you?’ films Gode pasientforløp have produced several short videos where the participants either receives or gives health care services • Solveig* – approx. 9,2 k views på FB • Silje – approx. 8,2 k views på FB • Marius* – approx. 2,6 k views på FB • Gro* • Torbjørn In addition a longer film* (4:23) with excerpts from all the individual films has been produced * English subtitles 27.06.2019 6 Activities all over Norway Sør-Varanger Municipality Åsnes Municipality 27.06.2019 7 Activities all over Norway, contd.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual and Sustainability Report 2018
    Annual and Sustainability Report 2018 We build for a better society. B Skanska Annual and Sustainability Report 2018 Operations Skanska’s operations consist of Construction and Project Development, including Residential Development, Commercial Property Development and, until 2018, Infrastructure Development. Business units within these streams collaborate in various ways, creating operational and financial synergies that generate increased value. Residential Commercial Property Infrastructure Construction Development Development Development 1 Constructs and renovates build- Develops new residential projects, Develops customer-focused office Secures and manages the value ings, infrastructure and homes, including single and multi-family buildings, shopping centers and of Skanska’s existing public- along with facilities manage- housing, built by the Construction logistics properties built by the private partnership (PPP) assets. ment and other related services. business stream. Construction business stream. 1 As of January 1, 2019, Infrastructure Development is no longer a business stream and is reported in Central on a separate line. Well diversified, Percentage of total revenue in 2018 with a leading market position Skanska’s diversification across various business streams with operations in eleven countries and several market segments strengthens the Group’s 40% SwedenSweden competitive standing and ensures FinlandFinland Norway a balanced and diversified risk profile. USA 38% Denmark United Kingdom Poland Czech Republic SlovakiaSlovakia Hungary 22% Romania Green revenue in 2018 Green market value in 2018 Green financing in 2018 Percentage of total Construction revenue Percentage of Commercial Property Percentage of total central debt 3 that is that is Green and Deep green, as defined Development market value from Green Green, according to the Skanska Green by the Skanska Color Palette™ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining NMT As Part of the NATM SCL Debate, Barton. N
    Defining NMT as part of the NATM SCL debate Sep 2012 Nick Barton, International tunnelling consultant, Oslo/SãoPaulo In response to Feedback to the TunnelTalk NATM and SCL article earlier this month, I suggested the addition of NMT to the pool of tunnelling method names. If we are seeking definitions, as per the longer Feedback definition of SCL contributed to the original article (Rekindled NATM debate - SCL debate opens - TunnelTalk, Aug 2012), then let me try defining and describing NMT a bit more thoroughly, as it is very different from NATM and quite different from SCL. The desk of NMT development The Norwegian Method of Tunnelling (NMT) has as one might expect from the name, an origin mostly from Norway. Numerous case records, eventually more than 1,250, were also finally mostly from Norway, but many of the early cases were from Sweden. It is this (and numerous single-shell caverns from many other countries too) that stimulated the original development of the Q-system of rock mass classification and tunnel support class definition. Q was developed in response to a State owner's question - 'why so variable deformations in Norwegian powerhouse caverns'? The Q-system was always based on economic 'single shell' tunnel and cavern reinforcement and support concepts, for mostly hard jointed rock, which however can often be faulted and have numerous clay- bearing joints and major clay-filled discontinuities. Sometimes solutions are needed for swelling clays as well. All of the above explains why the combination B+S(fr) (rockbolting and fibre reinforced shotcrete) is needed, as both the internal friction and the cohesive strength of the rock mass may be inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications
    E WIPO/STrad/INF/5 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: AUGUST 30, 2010 Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL OF ALL TYPES OF MARKS Document prepared by the Secretariat INTRODUCTION 1. From its twenty-first session (June 22, 2009 to June 26, 2009) to its twenty-third session (June 30, 2010 to July 2, 2010), the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT) considered a number of working documents dealing with grounds for refusal of all types of marks (see documents SCT/21/2, SCT/22/2, and SCT/23/2). 2. The documents were based on information provided by SCT Members in their replies to the WIPO Questionnaire on Trademark Law and Practice, as presented in WIPO document WIPO/STrad/INF/1 (hereinafter referred to as “the Questionnaire”), and in WIPO documents SCT/16/4, SCT/17/4 and SCT/18/3 referring to trademark opposition procedures. 3. In addition, the following SCT Members provided written submissions on specific aspects of their law and practice concerning grounds for refusal: Australia, Belarus, Brazil, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Guatemala, Hungary, Japan, Latvia, Mexico, Norway, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Russian Federation, Singapore, Slovenia, Sweden, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom, United States of America, Viet Nam, and the European Union (EU) (27). The African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI) also submitted its contribution. The full text of the submissions is posted on the SCT Electronic Forum webpage. WIPO/STrad/INF/5 page 2 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation 3 Quarter 2020
    Presentation 3rd quarter 2020 12 November 2020 Jimmy Bengtsson, CEO and Jørgen Wiese Porsmyr, CFO Occupational health and safety Our primary priority Number of serious injuries Sickness absence The Veidekke house 12-month rolling, Veidekke employees, hired staff Veidekke employees Focus on culture and sub-contractors 25 5% 20 4% 15 3% 10 2% 5 1% 0 0% Q3 15 Q3 16 Q3 17 Q3 18 Q3 19 Q3 20 Q3 Q3 15 Q3 16 Q3 17 Q3 18 Q3 19 Q3 20 Q3 2 © Veidekke Highlights 3rd quarter 2020 ● Divestment of property development business completed, generating a NOK 1.1 billion book gain ● Proposed dividend of NOK 20/share from transaction and additional NOK 2,5/share for 2019 ● Revenue increase in all three countries ● Continued operations generated a good result ● Good order intake in the quarter, but uncertainty related to market development continues Veidekke has been commissioned to build a velodrome and a commercial building comprising a secondary school, preschool, offices and business premises in Asker municipality. 3 © Veidekke Financial key figures, continued operations Revenue and earnings 3rd quarter 3rd quarter: Revenue 3rd quarter: Pre-tax profit NOK billion NOK million 12 600 9 400 6 505 9.5 8.5 9.0 200 390 417 3 0 0 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 4 © Veidekke Good order book Shift away from private commercial buildings Revenue and order intake Order book Order book per segment Converted into revenue next 12 mos. 12-month rolling, NOK billion NOK billion Percentage NOK billion 100 % 40 40 36 36 36 32 80 % 32 32 28 28 28 24 24 24 60 % 20 20 20 16 16
    [Show full text]
  • Judgment of the Court
    REPORT FOR THE HEARING in Case E-5/96 REQUEST to the Court under Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by Borgarting lagmannsrett's (Borgarting Court of Appeal) for an advisory opinion in the case pending before it between Ullensaker kommune and Others and Nille AS on the interpretation of Article 11 and 13 of the EEA Agreement. I. Introduction 1. By an order dated 21 June 1996, registered at the Court on 26 June 1996, Borgarting lagmannsrett, a Norwegian Court of Appeal, made a request for an advisory opinion in a case brought before it by Ullensaker municipality, Nes municipality, Eidsvoll municipality, Sørum municipality and Sunndal municipality (the appellants) against the respondent Nille AS (Nille). By a Ruling of 2 September 1996 the appeal on the part of Sunndal municipality was terminated. II. Legal background 2. The questions submitted by the Norwegian court concern the interpretation of Article 11 and Article 13 of the EEA Agreement. 3. Article 11 EEA, which mirrors Article 30 of the EC Treaty provides: "Quantitive restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between the Contracting Parties". 4. Article 13 EEA provides a derogation from Article 11 EEA under the same conditions as Article 36 EC: "The provisions of Article 11 and 12 shall not preclude prohibitions or restrictions on imports, exports or goods in transit justified on grounds of public morality, public policy or public security; the protection of health and life of humans, animals or plants; the protection of national treasures possessing artistic, historic or archaeological value; or the protection of industrial and commercial property.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2008 KLP and Society Page 3
    KLP AND SOCIETY PAGE 1 Together we generate values for the future: Sustainability report 2008 KLP AND SOCIETY PAGE 3 Table of contents 4 Foreword by our CEO 6 Values and foundations 10 Municipal high-risk sport 12Practicing what they preach 14 Leaping off the KLP list 16 Competition for the Blue Cross 18 Report 2008 How? 20 Customers 24 The environment Our customers have entrusted more than 200 billion 27 Society Norwegian kroner to us. These funds represent future pensions 32 The workplace 36 Plan of Action 2009 and compensation payments for public sector employees. By 38 GRI table incorporating strategies related to the climate, nature and society 39 Organisation and management in our management of these funds, we are making a major con tribution to a safer and more predictable future. But we cannot - achieve such ambitious goals alone. We rely on close cooperation with customers, owners, the companies in which we invest and numerous other partners to build the foundations for a sound and long-term process of value creation. PAGE 4 KLP AND SOCIETY KLP AND SOCIETY PAGE 5 However, there’s no A reliable point preaching to others if you can’t practice what you partner preach. In June 2008, KLP Skadeforsikring As every good sailor knows, a strong anchor can keep you was the first insurance safe when the storm comes. As a responsible administrator of company ever to customer funds in times of financial unrest, and as a shining achieve Eco-Light- Eco-Lighthouse in the era of climate change, KLP reaps the house certification.
    [Show full text]
  • Our County, Our Story; Portage County, Wisconsin
    Our County Our Story PORTAGE COUNTY WISCONSIN BY Malcolm Rosholt Charles M. White Memorial Public LibrarJ PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS STEVENS POINT, \VISCONSIN 1959 Copyright, 1959, by the PORTAGE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AT WORZALLA PUBLISHING COMPANY STEVENS POINT, WISCONSIN FOREWORD With the approach of the first frost in Portage County the leaves begin to fall from the white birch and the poplar trees. Shortly the basswood turns yellow and the elm tree takes on a reddish hue. The real glory of autumn begins in October when the maples, as if blushing in modesty, turn to gold and crimson, and the entire forest around is aflame with color set off against deeper shades of evergreens and newly-planted Christmas trees. To me this is the most beautiful season of the year. But it is not of her beauty only that I write, but of her colorful past, for Portage County is already rich in history and legend. And I share, in part, at least, the conviction of Margaret Fuller who wrote more than a century ago that "not one seed from the past" should be lost. Some may wonder why I include the names listed in the first tax rolls. It is part of my purpose to anchor these names in our history because, if for no other reas­ on, they were here first and there can never be another first. The spellings of names and places follow the spellings in the documents as far as legibility permits. Some no doubt are incorrect in the original entry, but the major­ ity were probably correct and since have changed, which makes the original entry a matter of historic significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Økologisk Tilstand Sagstuåa, Rapport LNR. 6219-2011
    6219-2011 - Økologisk tilstand i Sagstuåa, Nes RAPPORT L.NR. 6219-2011 ØkologiskRAPPORT tilstand LNR i Sagstuåa, 6219-2011 ØkologiskNes tilstand kommune i Sagstuåa, Nes kommune Sagstuåa ved Auli mølle (foto: M.Lindholm/NIVA) (foto: Auli mølle ved Sagstuåa Sagstuåa ved Auli mølle (foto: M.Lindholm/NIVA). Norsk institutt for vannforskning RAPPORT Hovedkontor Sørlandsavdelingen Østlandsavdelingen Vestlandsavdelingen NIVA Midt-Norge Gaustadalléen 21 Jon Lilletuns vei 3 Sandvikaveien 41 Postboks 2026 Postboks 1266 0349 Oslo 4879 Grimstad 2312 Ottestad 5817 Bergen 7462 Trondheim Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefon (47) 2218 51 00 Telefon (47) 22 18 51 00 Telefax (47) 22 18 52 00 Telefax (47) 37 04 45 13 Telefax (47) 62 57 66 53 Telefax (47) 55 23 24 95 Telefax (47) 73 54 63 87 Internett: www.niva.no Tittel Løpenr. (for bestilling) Dato Økologisk tilstand i Sagstuåa, Nes kommune NIVA-rapp. 6219-2011 5.10.2011 Sider Pris Prosjektnr. Undernr. 24 O - 11177 Forfatter(e) Fagområde Distribusjon Markus Lindholm Vannressursforvaltning Fri Geografisk område Trykket Akershus Oppdragsgiver(e) Oppdragsreferanse Nes kommune Leiv Knutson Sammendrag NIVA har vurdert økologisk tilstand i vassdraget Sagstuåa i Nes kommune i Akershus. På bakgrunn av vassdragets utforming, konkluderer vi med at vassdraget etter vanndirektivets kriterier må defineres som to ulike vannforekomster, med ulike miljømål. Vannkjemiske funn tilsier at den nedre delen av Sagstuåa er utsatt for forurensning knyttet til næringssalter fra bebyggelse og landbruk. Basert på opplysninger fra Nes kommune har vi satt opp et forenklet kilderegnskap for fosforavrenning til vassdraget.
    [Show full text]
  • En Studie Av Skredaktiviteten I Arnegårdslia, Nes Kommune, Hallingdal
    Masteroppgave, Institutt for geofag En studie av skredaktiviteten i Arnegårdslia, Nes kommune, Hallingdal Utløsende årsaker og menneskelig påvirkning Monika Rødin Lund En studie av skredaktiviteten i Arnegårdslia, Nes kommune, Hallingdal Utløsende årsaker og menneskelig påvirkning Monika Rødin Lund Masteroppgave i geofag Studieretning: Miljøgeologi og Geofarer Institutt for geofag Matematisk-naturvitenskaplig fakultet UNIVERSITETET I OSLO 3.6.2013 © Monika Rødin Lund, 2013 Dette eksamensarbeidet er publisert elektronisk i DUO – Digitale Utgivelser ved UiO http://www.duo.uio.no Det er også katalogisert i BIBSYS (http://www.bibsys.no/) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Forsidebilde: Skredet ved Oslo Lysverker boligene 23. mai 2013 (Foto: Politiet). Sammendrag Sommeren 2007 og 2011 ble flere store jordskred utløst i Arnegårdslia i Nes kommune, Hallingdal, noe som førte til store materielle skader. Målet med denne oppgaven har vært å undersøke jordskredaktiviteten i denne dalsiden for å få en forståelse av hva som forårsaket disse hendelsene og når og hvor neste skred vil inntreffe. Gjennom feltstudier har dalsidens raviner og skredavsetninger blitt kartlagt. Observerte nedbørmengder har blitt sammenlignet med gitte terskelverdier for å studere nedbørens betydning for utløsningen av hendelsene i 2007 og 2011. Gjentaksintervallet for utløsende nedbørmengder har også blitt beregnet for å kunne gi en indikasjon på når neste skredhendelse kan inntreffe. Flere analyser har blitt foretatt for å undersøke skogsbilveiens betydning i forhold til dens påvirkning på utløsningen av skredene i 2007 og 2011, og fremtidige skred. De mange ravinene og skredavsetningene gir et bilde av den store skredaktiviteten som har vært i dalsiden.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2017
    Sustainability report 2017 Number of serious CDP score injuries reduced by 46% A- from 2016 to 2017 in 2016 and 2017 3 Introduction by the President and CEO 4 This is Veidekke CONTENTS 12 How sustainability is managed at Veidekke 14 Stakeholder engagement 18 Ethics and compliance 22 Occupational health and safety 28 Environment and climate change 34 Close collaboration with suppliers 38 The people at Veidekke 45 Report parameters 46 GRI Index Veidekke shall be a leader in sustainability. The United Nations sustainable development goals are used as a framework for our work, and these goals have been incorporated into the company’s management model and strategy towards 2020. In 2016 and 2017, Veidekke has been working on goals 8, 12, 13, 16 and 17, in addition to focusing on goals 5, 9 and 11. INTRODUCTION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CEO Sustainability is future competitiveness the issues that concern our customers and others to an ever As one of Scandinavia‘s leading contracting companies, stronger degree. Veidekke has a special responsibility for operating in a way that • Sickness absence affects productivity. Veidekke’s causes the least possible environmental damage and makes the employees are satisfied on the job, and a lower sickness industry safer to work in and with. High resource consumption, absence rate than otherwise in the industry reflects this. We emission problems and significant risk of injuries and accidents, are also pleased that the number of serious injuries declined as well as a few unprofessional actors, means that the construc- by more than a third in 2017, and through the project tion and civil engineering industry has significant sustainability Everyone‘s Experience, Shared Learning we will continue challenges and a corresponding potential for improvement.
    [Show full text]