DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultancy Agreement with Non-Healthcare Organisation SPECIAL TERMS This Agreement Is Made by and Between Sanofi A/S, a Compan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consultancy Agreement with Non-Healthcare Organisation SPECIAL TERMS This Agreement Is Made by and Between Sanofi A/S, a Compan Consultancy Agreement With non-HealthCare Organisation SPECIAL TERMS This Agreement is made by and between Sanofi A/S, a company duly registered under the laws of Denmark under the business identity number 19064301, having its principal place of business at Lyngbyvej 2, DK- 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark (hereinafter referred to as “SANOFI”), and Sjældne Diagnoser, Blekinge Boulevard 2, DK-2630 Taastrup CONSULTANT CVR. 20514892, represented by Director Lene Jensen (hereinafter referred to as the “CONSULTANT”) SANOFI and CONSULTANT shall individually be referred to as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties” 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Please complete the table with your contact details in order for SANOFI to be able to contact you in relation to the specified Services. SANOFI will not use your contact details in any other purpose than for the Services as specified in this Agreement. E-mail Mobile Number ICE (Contact Details in Case of Emergency) Optional [email protected] +45 33 14 00 10 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICE Participation in Round Table Forum for pharmaceutical companies with a focus on rare diseases – the amount paid by each company is DKK 12.500 per year. Rare Diseases Denmark provides secretarial assistance, initiates and hosts the meetings. Members of the Round Table Forum will be called with the name and logo on Rare Diseases Denmark´s website and in the Annual Report of Rare Diseases Denmark. The purpose of the Round Table Forum is to raise awareness of rare diseases and to strengthen the voice of patients and relatives afflicted by rare diseases. This is done through cooperation on problem areas of common interest. Core principles: •The Round Table Forum is a joint forum forcompanies and Rare Diseases Denmark. •The work is based on openness, transparency andmutual respect. •The centre focus is on common agendas, notcompany-specific agendas. Page 1 of 7 Meeting date: June 12th 2020 Venue: Kalvebod Brygge 31-33 og virtuelt Subject: Round Table Forum 2020 Deliverable: Diagnosticering af sjældne sygdomme med fokus på de voksne Length of Service (including preparation and travel time) Gradually over the year Contact Person within SANOFI: [email protected] 2. DATES OF THE SERVICE Notwithstanding its signature date, the Agreement shall be effective from the “Effective Date” to the “End Date” mentioned below: Effective Date: Date of last given signature End Date: The 30th of September 2021 Any amendment to the Agreement shall be made in writing and signed by both Parties. 3. FEES In consideration of the Services to be provided under this Agreement, SANOFI shall pay a fee of TWELVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED (12.500) DKK for the Services performed (collectively the "Fees"). The number of hours is specified below. Travel compensation is additional. Travel compensation is additional. SANOFI agrees to reimburse the travel, hotel, restaurants and registration expenses reasonably incurred for the performance of the Services under the limits set by the laws and the Appendix Hospitality Rules. Services/Deliverables Hours of Total Services compensation, DKK Length of service N/A 12,500 DKK TOTAL 12,500 DKK 4. PAYMENT TERMS All sums due under the Agreement shall be paid by SANOFI to the CONSULTANT by wire transfer in a bank account located in the country where the CONSULTANT is duly registered. The CONSULTANT will ensure that all invoices sent to Sanofi are correctly detailed, by specifying in particular the amount and associated Service. Payments of undisputed invoices shall be made within thirty (30) days following the date of issue of the invoice. Invoices shall mention the following: the name and address of each Party, the Effective Date of the Agreement, the price net of any taxes, the references of the banking account to which the payments must be made. Invoice should be sent as pdf to: [email protected]. If not possible send to: Sanofi A/S, Lyngbyvej 2, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Invoice(s) shall be sent no longer than three (3) months after the end of the Service. Page 2 of 7 5. SIGNATURE This Agreement has been drawn up in two (2) copies, of which the parties mentioned below shall retain one copy each. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on their behalf, as of the Effective date. In the event that the Parties execute this Agreement by exchange of electronically signed copies or facsimile signed copies, the Parties agree that, upon being signed by all Parties, this Agreement will become effective and binding and that facsimile copies and/or electronic signatures will constitute evidence of a binding agreement with the expectation that original documents may later be exchanged in good faith. SANOFI CONSULTANT Name: Rasmus Villemoes Name: Lene Jensen Date: Jun 8, 2020 Date: Jun 8, 2020 Rasmus Villemoes Rasmus____________________________ Villemoes (Jun 8, 2020 12:48 GMT+2) _________________________ Signature Signature Page 3 of 7 GENERAL TERMS This “Agreement” made of the General Terms, the Special Terms and the Appendices, is between SANOFI and CONSULTANT (as defined in the Special Terms). Subject to these terms SANOFI will retain CONSULTANT as an independent contractor for the period commencing and ending in accordance the dates mentioned in the Special Terms. 1. General Obligations. CONSULTANT shall allocate all necessary staff, time and material for the achievement of the Service within the timelines as agreed with SANOFI. The Service shall be provided in accordance with applicable laws and regulations as well as any national codes of practice which may apply to the performance of the Service. In consideration of the performance of the Service SANOFI shall pay the fee detailed in the Special Terms. 2. Tax and insurance. CONSULTANT agrees to bear all taxes and social benefit contribution which could be payable on the fees CONSULTANT receives under this Agreement. CONSULTANT also agrees to ensure it has all relevant insurance necessary in order to perform the Service. 3. Ownership. “Affiliate(s)" shall mean Sanofi (registered in PARIS, France under the n°395 030 844, hereinafter "SANOFI SA") and any legal entity which is controlled by SANOFI SA or under common control with SANOFI SA or controlling SANOFI SA. “Control” means the direct or indirect ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the share capital or the voting rights of such entity or of the power to designate the majority of the members of its principal management body. “SANOFI’s IP”: All the information, documentation, data, trade secrets, patent, copyrights, know-how, (i) which are owned by SANOFI or its Affiliates, or (ii) which are licensed to SANOFI. “CONSULTANT’s IP”: All of the CONSULTANT’s pre-existing intellectual property rights prior to entry into this Agreement. “Deliverables”: results of the Service including any and all presentation, reports, inventions, data and other materials and works, including any intellectual property rights related thereto that are not SANOFI's IP or CONSULTANT's IP, created by the CONSULTANT in connection with the Service. CONSULTANT shall remain the owner of CONSULTANT’s IP. SANOFI and its Affiliates shall remain the owner of SANOFI’s IP. SANOFI grants the CONSULTANT a non-exclusive, limited, non-transferable right to use SANOFI’s IP solely for the purpose and duration of the Service. SANOFI shall become the owner of the Deliverables and the CONSULTANT shall not use them outside the scope of the Service. The remuneration paid to CONSULTANT under this Agreement constitutes the full payment for any intellectual property right included in the Deliverables. The transfer of ownership includes the rights for SANOFI and its Affiliates to reproduce and to make reproduction, to represent and to make representation, to adapt and to make adaptation, to modify and make modification, and to make all use of all or parts of the Deliverables, as well as to translate and to make translation of the Deliverables. The rights transferred shall last for the duration of the intellectual property rights attached to the Deliverables. If the Deliverables include CONSULTANT’s IP, CONSULTANT hereby grants to SANOFI and its Affiliates an irrevocable, non-exclusive, world-wide, perpetual, royalty-free license to use such of CONSULTANT’s IP in order to allow SANOFI and its Affiliates to further use develop and exploit the Deliverables. 4. Indemnity. The CONSULTANT hereby represents and warrants to SANOFI that CONSULTANT’s performance of the Service will not violate any proprietary rights of any third party. The CONSULTANT hereby separately agrees to indemnify and hold SANOFI harmless from any loss, claim, damage, costs or expense of any kind, both direct and indirect, and including reasonable attorneys’ fees. 5. Confidentiality. SANOFI’s IP and all strategic and organisational information to which the CONSULTANT will have access during the course of the Service (the “Confidential Information”) shall be considered and treated by the CONSULTANT as confidential. The CONSULTANT agrees, for the duration of the Agreement and ten (10) years thereafter (i) not to disclose it to any third party, and (ii) to use it exclusively for the purposes of the Service. All Confidential Information shall be destroyed after this period of time. However, this clause will not apply to information: i) which is known to the CONSULTANT as evidenced by CONSULTANT’s written records before receipt thereof from SANOFI, or its Affiliates; or Page 4 of 7 ii) which is disclosed in good faith to the CONSULTANT after acceptance of the Agreement by a third person lawfully in possession of such information and not under an obligation of nondisclosure; or iii) which is or becomes part of the public knowledge or is publicly disclosed through no fault of the CONSULTANT; or iv) which the CONSULTANT is required to disclose as a result of laws, rules or other legal process, provided that the CONSULTANT will promptly notify SANOFI thereof.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CSA Position Paper 25-404 - New Self-Regulatory Organization Framework
    CSA Position Paper 25-404 - New Self-Regulatory Organization Framework August 3, 2021 1. Introduction In December 2019, a Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) working group (the Working Group1) was formed to conduct an in-depth review of the current framework for the two Self- Regulatory Organizations (SROs) – the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) and the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (MFDA).2 Since then, as part of this SRO Framework Review Project (the SRO Project), the Working Group has completed extensive stakeholder consultations, collected data and conducted research relevant to the assessment of the current regulatory framework, and developed and executed a methodology to identify, evaluate and rank the options for addressing the issues identified within the current SRO framework. To date, all of the Working Group’s activities have been completed in accordance with its project timeline, including the publication of this CSA Position Paper (the Position Paper). Below, is a detailed breakdown of key steps in the SRO Project to date: On December 12, 2019, the CSA issued a news release announcing its comprehensive review of the regulatory framework for IIROC and the MFDA. In late 2019 and early 2020, the Working Group completed informal consultations with a wide variety of stakeholder groups to solicit views regarding the current SRO regulatory framework. On June 25, 2020, the CSA Consultation Paper 25-402 Consultation on the Self- Regulatory Organization Framework (the Consultation Paper)
    [Show full text]
  • (IOSCO), the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision
    PRESS RELEASE ( February 19, 1999 ) The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision (Basle Committee) and the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) today announced the release of documents prepared by the Joint Forum on Financial Conglomerates (Joint Forum) on the supervision of financial conglomerates. The papers are a significant step forward in addressing some of the most important supervisory issues that arise from the continuing emergence of financial conglomerates and the blurring of distinctions between the activities of firms in each of the banking, securities and insurance sectors. The matters dealt with in the papers include: • techniques for assessing the capital adequacy of conglomerates including detecting excessive gearing • facilitating the exchange of information among supervisors • coordination among supervisors • testing the fitness and propriety of managers, directors and major shareholders of conglomerates. The international supervisory community is moving steadfastly to meet the challenges posed by the emergence of financial conglomerates. The Technical Committees of IOSCO and IAIS, and the Basle Committee have urged the members of their organisations to implement the principles set out in the papers. Prior to developing the papers, the Joint Forum carried out an intensive study of fourteen major international conglomerates. Extensive consultation with industry and the wider supervisory community was carried out before the papers were
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Forum Releases Report on Securitisation Incentives
    THE JOINT FORUM BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCI ATION OF INSURANCE S UPERVISORS C/O BANK FOR INTERNA TIONAL SETTLEMENTS CH-4002 BASEL, SWITZERL AND New Chairman Press release Press enquiries: +41 61 280 8188 [email protected] www.bis.org 13 July 2011 Joint Forum releases report on securitisation incentives The Joint Forum today released its Report on Asset Securitisation Incentives. The Report is based on an extensive literature review, and interviews in Europe, the United States and Australia with originators, issuers, service providers and investors. The Report analyses the incentives to engage in securitisation throughout the market before the financial crisis, the distortions created by misalignments and conflicts of interest which emerged, and the interplay of incentives in the aftermath of the crisis. It also examines some of the reasons why there has yet to be a meaningful recovery in securitisation activity. The Report outlines three recommendations to authorities on the tools and approaches they can employ to promote a sustainable and responsible securitisation framework. Mr Tony D’Aloisio, Chairman of the Joint Forum, said ”Re-establishing securitisation on a sound basis is a priority for the FSB and part of the G20’s push to strengthen the international financial regulatory system. The Joint Forum recognises the important contribution it can make due to its cross-sectoral representation from the banking, insurance and securities sectors. Drawing on an extensive literature review and interviews with market participants in several key jurisdictions, this report provides an important perspective on the dynamics prevailing in securitisation markets and aims to inform the continuing regulatory efforts internationally to facilitate a sound and responsible framework for securitisation markets.” Key Findings: The Report confirms funding diversification, risk transfer, revenue generation and regulatory capital benefits as the key drivers for originators and issuers before the crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Forum Releases Cross Sectoral Reports (November 7, 2001)
    !" #$%BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION Press release Press enquiries: (+41 61) 280 8188 [email protected] www.bis.org Ref no: 7 November 2001 Joint Forum releases cross-sectoral reports The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee), the Technical Committees of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) today announced the release of two reports prepared by the Joint Forum. The reports released cover, first, cross-sectoral comparisons of risk management practices and regulatory capital and, second, core principles developed by the three parent committees for their respective sectors. Both reports provide an overview for supervisors in the banking, insurance and securities sectors. While these documents are not being issued for comments, industry feedback to the respective sector supervisor on key points is most welcome and will be considered by the parent organisations (Basel Committee, IOSCO and IAIS) in the further work of the Joint Forum. Joint Forum documents are available from the websites of the BIS (www.bis.org), IAIS (www.iaisweb.org) and IOSCO (www.iosco.org). Centralbahnplatz 2 · CH-4002 Basel · Switzerland · Tel: (+41 61) 280 8080 · Fax: (+41 61) 280 9100 · [email protected] 1/4 THE JOINT FORUM BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS C/O BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS CH-4002 BASEL, SWITZERLAND Risk management practices and regulatory capital The report Risk management practices and regulatory capital responds to the parent committees’ request to compare these approaches to gain a better understanding of current industry practices in all three sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release Press Enquiries: +41 61 280 8188 [email protected]
    THE JOINT FORUM BASEL COMMITTEE ON B ANKING SUPERVISION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCI ATION OF INSURANCE S UPERVISORS C/O BANK FOR INTERNA TIONAL SETTLEMENTS CH-4002 BASEL, SWITZERL AND New Chairman Press release Press enquiries: +41 61 280 8188 [email protected] www.bis.org Ref no: ??/2008E April 2008 Joint Forum release of Risk Concentrations paper The Joint Forum released a paper today entitled Cross-Sectoral Review of Group- Wide Identification and Management of Risk Concentrations. The Risk Concentrations paper is being released in final form and has also been included in the Joint Forum submissions to the Financial Stability Forum to contribute to its work related to the market turmoil. The Risk Concentrations paper builds upon prior work conducted by the Joint Forum on risk integration and aggregation. It assesses the progress made by financial conglomerates in identifying, measuring and managing risk concentrations on a firm-wide basis and across the major risks to which these firms are exposed. The paper also includes observations and lessons drawn from the market turmoil that begin in mid-2007. John C Dugan, the Chairman of the Joint Forum and Comptroller of the Currency in the United States, said today, "This paper highlights critical issues in firms’ ability to identify risk concentrations and this relates to stress testing. Not only do firms need to factor liquidity risk into firm-wide, integrated stress tests but they also need to take into consideration second-order effects
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Roger W to the IMFC Meeting in Washington
    Statement by Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. Chairman of the Financial Stability Forum International Monetary and Financial Committee Meeting 2 October 2004 Washington, D.C. The Financial Stability Forum (FSF) held its twelfth meeting on 8-9 September 2004 in Washington. For purposes of this report, the topics addressed fall into six broad categories: potential vulnerabilities in the international financial system; implementation of international financial sector standards; offshore financial centres; financial reporting and governance; credit risk transfer; and reinsurance. Vulnerabilities in the international financial system The central view of the Forum was that the macroeconomic backdrop for financial markets had generally improved since its March meeting. Several previous downside risks have become less pronounced: markets have adjusted well to the initial stages of withdrawal of monetary stimulus; and the resilience of key financial systems to shocks has increased further. Nonetheless, the Forum saw little room for complacency and discussed several areas meriting close monitoring in the period ahead, including the potential impact of removing policy stimulus; the potential impact of sustained high oil prices on growth and inflation; continuing fiscal and external imbalances in several countries; ongoing uncertainties about the trajectory of the Chinese economy; and the resilience of emerging market economies to these developments. Members also reviewed financial sector vulnerabilities. They noted strengthened levels of capital in the financial system and discussed potential sources of heightened market volatility and impairment of market liquidity. The Forum also discussed the impact of rising inflows to hedge funds on market functioning and on the risk profile of financial institutions, and the progress made to date to strengthen business continuity arrangements in key financial centres.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Large and Internationally Active Banks,” Cosponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the World Bank
    WELCOME AGENDA SPEAKER BIOS INFORMATION WELCOME AGENDA SPEAKER BIOS INFORMATION WELCOME AGENDA SPEAKER BIOS INFORMATION Welcome WELCOME TO THE CONFERENCE ON “THE FUTURE OF LARGE AND INTERNATIONALLY ACTIVE BANKS,” COSPONSORED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO AND THE WORLD BANK. THIS IS THE 18TH IN AN ANNUAL SERIES OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING CONFERENCES FOCUSING ON CURRENT PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES IN GLOBAL FINANCE AND ECONOMICS. THESE CONFERENCES FEATURE INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED EXPERTS FROM DIFFERENT PROFESSIONS AND COUNTRIES AND ARE AIMED AT AN INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE OF FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORS, PRACTITIONERS, POLICYMAKERS, AND RESEARCHERS. The Great Financial Crisis of 2007–10 had a major impact on large cross-border banks, which were widely blamed for the start and severity of the crisis. As a result, much pub- lic policy, both in the United States and abroad, has been directed at making these banks safer and less influential, by means of both micro- and macro-prudential regulation. Conference participants will explore the current regulatory landscape for these institutions. How have modifications to that landscape affected the level of intermediation and changes in risk man- agement? What adjustments have been made to the bank safety net and failure resolution process? How effective are those adjustments thought to be—particularly those requiring international regu- latory cooperation? What are the prospects for the new single supervisory mechanism introduced by the European Central Bank? What lessons can we draw from the changes in bank operations to date? What additional changes can we expect? The conference speakers and audience participants represent a wide array of organizations from a diverse spectrum of countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Credit Risk Transfer
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision The Joint Forum Credit Risk Transfer October 2004 THE JOINT FORUM BASEL COMMITTEE ON BANKING SUPERVISION INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SECURITIES COMMISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS C/O BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS CH-4002 BASEL, SWITZERLAND Credit Risk Transfer October 2004 Table of contents Report on Credit Risk Transfer: Summary............................................................................... 1 Do the transactions accomplish a clean transfer of risk?..................................................... 2 Do participants understand the risks involved?.................................................................... 3 Are undue concentrations of risk developing? ..................................................................... 4 Financial Stability Implications ............................................................................................. 4 Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 5 Report on Credit Risk Transfer.............................................................................................. 11 1. Background................................................................................................................. 11 2. Trends and Market Developments.............................................................................. 12 3. Extent and Sources of Risk Transfer .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seventeenth Meeting of the FSF in Frankfurt
    FINANCIAL STABILITY FORUM Press release Press enquiries: Basel +41 61 280 8188 [email protected] Ref 08/2007E 29 March 2007 Financial Stability Forum meets in Frankfurt The Financial Stability Forum (FSF) met today in Frankfurt. Members of the FSF discussed risks and vulnerabilities in the international financial system and reviewed ongoing work to strengthen financial system stability and resilience. Assessing and addressing risks in financial systems FSF members reviewed recent developments in financial markets. They noted that turbulence in equity and credit markets in late February and early March involved an adjustment in risk positions amidst some increase in macroeconomic uncertainty and concern about the scope of problems in the US subprime mortgage sector. The episode illustrated the extent of linkages among risk premia in different asset classes in the current environment. Market participants need to ensure that risk management scenarios take appropriate account of the risks and potential consequences that would arise from a more pronounced and prolonged reduction of risk-taking. Credit risk transfer (CRT) markets While rapid innovation in credit risk transfer instruments has facilitated the management and diversification of credit risk, questions remain about how these instruments might behave during a period of stress. Members discussed steps that can be taken to strengthen the underpinnings of CRT activity, including strengthening infrastructure, improving transparency and enhancing stress testing. In view of the continued growth and innovation in these markets, the FSF asked the Joint Forum to consider the extent to which its 2005 paper on Credit Risk Transfer merits updating. Hedge funds and counterparty risk management The FSF discussed developments in the hedge fund sector and the supervisory, regulatory and private sector actions taken in recent years to strengthen market discipline, risk management practices and market infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Back to Office Report
    Association of Supervisors of Banks of the Americas (ASBA) – Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Meeting on Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB) and the Revised Standardised Approach (RSA) for Credit Risk Hosted by ASBA and the Central Bank of Brazil Sao Paulo, Brazil, 27–28 April 2016 Speakers’ Curriculum Vitae (in order of appearance) Mr Stefan Hohl, Financial Stability Institute, Bank for International Settlements Stefan Hohl joined the Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) as a Senior Financial Sector Specialist in 2005. He is primarily responsible for assisting financial sector supervisors globally with the implementation of sound practices for effective banking supervision. Stefan currently represents the FSI in the Policy Development Group (PDG) and the Trading Book Group (TBG) of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). Before joining the FSI, Mr Hohl was a Senior Economist (Supervision) in the BIS Representative Office for Asia and the Pacific in Hong Kong. Prior to joining the BIS in 2001 he worked for the Deutsche Bundesbank in Frankfurt in its department for Banking Supervision. Since, he has been actively involved in the work of the Basel Committee (BCBS) on Basel II and Basel III as a German and FSI representative on various BCBS working groups as well as a member of BCBS’ expanded secretariat working on Basel II. He has a wide experience as a lecturer on banking related topics. He also gained market experience in an investment company as a portfolio manager; and he acted as a founding member of a software company.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Stability Forum Held Its Twelfth Meeting
    FINANCIAL STABILITY FORUM Press release Press enquiries: Basel +41 61 280 8188 [email protected] Ref no: 22/2004E 9 September 2004 Financial Stability Forum held its Twelfth Meeting The Financial Stability Forum (FSF), chaired by Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, met on 8-9 September in Washington DC. As usual, members discussed risks and vulnerabilities in the international financial system. They discussed issues related to a number of prior concerns. Offshore financial centres received particular attention. They also discussed other issues, including progress and challenges around the world associated with the implementation of standards in financial sector regulation. On this occasion, the Forum also met with a group of financial market participants to exchange views on developments in financial markets and institutions. Vulnerabilities in the international financial system Members felt generally that the macroeconomic backdrop for financial markets had improved since their previous meeting in Rome in March. Members discussed various issues, including the potential impact of removing policy stimulus; the potential impact of sustained high oil prices on growth and inflation; continuing fiscal and external imbalances in several countries; ongoing uncertainties about the trajectory of the Chinese economy; and the resilience of emerging market economies to these developments. Members also reviewed financial sector vulnerabilities. They noted strengthened levels of capital in the financial system and discussed potential sources of heightened market volatility and impairment of market liquidity. Members also discussed the progress made to date on planning for business continuity. Financial sector regulation: issues and gaps Members considered ways to improve the implementation of regulatory standards in the banking, securities and insurance sectors, based on the experience of the joint IMF/World Bank Financial Sector Assessment Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Federation Bancaire Francaise
    FEDERATION BANCAIRE FRANCAISE Banking supervision And Accounting issues Unit The Director Paris, April 30th2013 French Banking Federation comments on the Joint Forum Consultative Document on Mortgage insurance: market structure, underwriting cycle and policy implications. Dear Sir, The French Banking Federation (FBF) represents the interests of the banking industry in France. Its membership is composed of all credit institutions authorized as banks and doing business in France, i.e. more than 425 commercial, cooperative and mutual banks. FBF member banks have more than 39,000 permanent branches in France. They employ 380,000 people in France and around the world, and service 48 million customers. The French Banking Federation appreciates the opportunity to offer its views on the mortgage insurance recommendations proposed by the Joint Forum and we endeavor to comment on each recommendation proposed by the Forum (Part 2 of the document). We recognize that the Joint Forum rightly highlights the issues related to mortgage loan insurance that have been disregarded or forgotten in many cases. In our response we support the recommendations proposed by the Joint Forum and insist on the characteristics of the French residential loans secured by a guarantee. The French Banking Federation notes with satisfaction that the annex of the consultation devoted to France rightly highlights the effectiveness of French financial services practices in relation to property lending. However, there continues to be a misunderstanding of the guarantee system provided by guarantee insurance in France, as well as the idea that mortgage would be a better or more secured guarantee than guarantee insurance. This is why we consider it useful to clarify the scope and functioning of the residential loan guarantee system in France, in order to confirm that it belongs to the "Mortgage Insurance" category.
    [Show full text]