DOCSLIB.ORG

The New Head of Internal Audit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New Head of Internal Audit The New Head of Internal Audit First 100 days as newly appointed Chief Audit Executive (CAE) kpmg.ch Editorial The appointment as the new Head of Internal Audit (IA) presents an array of exciting prospects and challenges for a Chief Audit Executive (CAE). Stepping into this role allows for a new perspective on how internal audit should be defined and executed within an organization and presents a unique opportunity to introduce fresh ideas and effective and sustainable change to the internal audit organization. However, as the newly appointed Head of IA one must also be aware of the high expectations of various stakeholders, be it the IA team, the broader organization, executive management or the board/audit committee. Luka Zupan Partner It is thus crucial for a CAE to build their credibility within the Head Internal Audit organization and quickly become operational. Risk and Compliance Services (IARCS) This paper provides guidance on how to navigate through the first 100 days as a newly appointed Chief Audit Executive (CAE). With topics ranging from the structure of the Three Lines of Defense, to the sourcing of your IA function as well as current and emerging risks for consideration; this paper provides various perspectives and ideas to guide you and provide insights on the upcoming journey. It suggests timeframes for key activities and a detailed implementation checklist to ensure that progress and momentum is achieved. KPMG as a professional internal audit service provider is enthusiastic to support you in your journey as CAE in setting up/re-organizing the IA function, assisting you to drive momentum and provide insights on industry and IA best practices. With a highly capable, multi-disciplinary and global team we can assist you with various service offerings including methodology that is aligned to the IIA standards and modern approaches such as data analytics; delivery of internal audit missions on a global scale; conducting enterprise risk management exercises; support in executing forensic and fraud prevention activities as well as assisting in driving the compliance agenda. Additionally, we can provide a quick and effective performance assessment on the current state of the IA function which can help you in the initial assessment of the IA function and identify areas for improvement. Content Top concerns of Audit Committees 4 Introduction 4 Setting the scene: The universe we face today 4 The three lines of defense: Risk governance 5 Where does your Internal Audit department stand? 5 Current issues and emerging risks for Internal Audit 6 Questions to ask about your Internal Audit department 8 The first 100 days 9 Executing the CAE agenda 10 Checklist and time line 12 How we can help 14 Quality assurance and performance assessment of Internal Audit 16 KPMG as Internal Audit partner 17 Sustainability of Internal Controls 18 KPMG thought leadership on Internal Audit 19 Closing perspective 20 As the head of an Internal Audit (IA) department one has to lead an independent department providing assurance to the Board of Directors Introduction (BoD) regarding risk management, control and governance processes. The Audit Committee (AC) of the BoD expects IA to be able to provide With companies navigating through a volatile meaningful insights and unbiased opinions, which add value and economic landscape, Chief Audit Executives improve an organization’s operations. The top concerns of ACs are (CAE) face difficult choices when addressing listed below: the evolving issues and related risk factors of their organizations. Changing stakeholder expectations and a new view of risk management have prompted an important shift in the role of IA in many organizations. New demands from the board, senior Top concerns of organizational leaders, and regulators require IA to refocus its efforts beyond regulatory compliance issues. As a result the task Audit Committees becomes all the more difficult for a new CAE to move forward in the role. 1. Strategy: Continuous development, implementation and monitoring of strategic objectives for the organization. 2. Corporate Governance: Enhancing the value and efficiency of corporate governance and compliance processes Setting the scene: including effective reporting to internal and external stakeholders. The universe we face today 3. Data Analytics: Fully utilizing the potential of data analytics, continuous auditing and robotics to improve business External factors driving change processes and audit efficiency. • Regulatory pressures 4. IT risk: Effectively managing emerging IT risks such as • Emergence of new business risks cyber security whilst also maintaining a cost-efficient IT • Increased focus on risk and controls from environment. shareholders and investors 5. Third parties: Optimized assessment, monitoring and • Demands for greater accountability from controlling of the risks, relations and returns related to stakeholders dealing with third parties. • Higher levels of macroeconomic and 6. Tax: Evaluating the organizational impact of the Corporate political uncertainty Tax Reform III including effect on financial results and • Financial market volatility potential tax function transformation. • Increased use of offshoring 7. Assurance: Independent, concise and relevant assurance reporting from both internal and external auditors on all key Internal factors driving change aspects required for informed decision making. • Increased focus on risk and controls by 8. Regulations: Ensuring a sustainable yet effective approach senior management and the board to regulatory compliance on a global, regional and local level • Focus on cost reduction and efficiency (e.g. FCPA, Dodd-Frank Act). • Market expansion (e.g. new product / 9. EU Audit Reform: Understanding and evaluating the impact service development) of the EU Audit Reform on corporations at a global and local • Geographic expansion level. • Emergence of new operations risks 10. Corporate culture: Ensuring long-term, sustainable • Stronger risk awareness culture instilled organization growth through ongoing enhancement of within the organization corporate culture and implementation of talent development • Postmerger process integration and employee-retention programs. 11. Risk Management: Ability of the risk management process to effectively identify emerging risks, provide accurate risk assessment and implement cost-efficient counter- measures. 12. Changing business landscape: Ensuring that the organization is well-equipped to respond to a changing environment, new operating models, emerging competitors and game changers such as the economy 4.0. or geopolitical influences (Brexit). 4 / The New Head of Internal Audit January 2021 The second line of defense summarizes the supervisory The three lines functions that typically support and monitor the management of key risks and report to Executive Management. Examples of functions include Risk of defense: Management, Compliance, Legal, Quality Control etc. Risk governance The highest level of assurance in terms of independence comprises the internal and external audit functions – The “three lines of defense” model helps to understand defined as the third line of defense. Their focus lies in relationships and interactions between the various layers of providing in-depth assurance to the BoD that the key risks an organization regarding risk and control ownership, of the organization have been identified, are effectively and facilitation/monitoring and independent assessment. efficiently managed by the first and second lines of defense. In addition to independent assurance provided by the IA The model outlines that the business as the first line of function, IA also helps organizations to create business defense is responsible to make sure that risks are managed value, i.e. insights into best practice, or identify process at an acceptable level and controls executed effectively. efficiencies. Risk Reports to Day-to-day business operations 1st line Risk identification and assessment, Feedback of defense risk management and risk reporting Risk Reports to Board of Board Directors Strategic management, policy setting Reports to 2nd line and oversight function of defense Guidance, monitoring and improvement Feedback (standard setters) Feedback Risk Risk Committee Audit Audit Reports to Management/ Executive 3rd line Independent challenge and assurance of defense (Internal Audit) Committee Where does your Internal Audit department stand? Get a grasp on the maturity of your IA department based on the characteristics of a leading IA organization. From an underperforming IA function… … to … … an excelling IA function Individual assurance silos, no Coordinated approach to Single view and understanding of key coordinated risk perspective understanding key risks risks across the organization Focus on internal controls (ICoFR) Risk-based assurance across Strategic value creation is actively assurance and partially on internal operations, financials and compliance incorporated into risk-based auditing compliance processes Misaligned skill sets, underleveraged Active talent management within the Operational experience, «skills on staff, limited career prospects, no organization and continuous demand» including guest auditor and rotation program development of skill sets rotation programs Ad hoc use of data analytics (DA) More frequent use of DA to assess Leveraging DA to assess the impact of processes business strategy; assess effectiveness Characteristics and efficiency of processes and controls; DA incorporated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metropolitan Council Internal Audit Charter A
    METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INTERNAL AUDIT CHARTER A. AUDIT COMMITTEE PURPOSE: The Metropolitan Council has established a special committee of the Council to be called the Metropolitan Council Audit Committee. The purpose of the Committee is to assist the Metropolitan Council in fulfilling its oversight responsibility for the integrity of the Council’s financial and operational results, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and the performance of internal audit and external auditors. AUTHORITY: The Audit Committee has authority to conduct or authorize special audits and investigations into any matters within its scope of responsibility. It is empowered to: Approve the Chief Audit Executive’s Audit Plan. Resolve any disagreements between management and the internal/external auditors regarding financial or operational control and reporting. Review and accept external auditors’ reports along with management’s written responses when appropriate. Obtain information from employees or external parties as part of its review. Council employees are directed to cooperate with Audit Committee requests. Meet with Council employees, external auditors, legal counsel, or others as necessary. Be consulted regarding changes in the Chief Audit Executive’s duties. Be informed of all matters that impair the conduct of an audit or review. However, where feasible such matters shall be first brought to the attention of the Regional Administrator for resolution before communicating them to the Audit Committee. Make periodic reports to the Council or appropriate standing committee established by the Council. RESPONSIBILITIES: Financial and Operational Review Oversight Review significant accounting, operational and reporting issues and understand their impact on the financial and operating results on the Metropolitan Council’s system of internal control.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Control and the Board: What Is All the Fuss About?
    The Deloitte Academy June 2021 Stakeholders Societal licence Shareholders Responsible business Transparency Corporate governance Viability Company purposeAudit committee Culture Strategy Viability Internal control KPIs Audit quality Remuneration Sustainability Trust Shareholders Strategy Assurance KPIs Reputation Capability Stakeholders Company purpose Viability Internal control and the board: What is all the fuss about? Headlines • The UK Corporate Governance Code already establishes a clear responsibility on the whole board to establish a framework of prudent and effective controls – however, behind the UK proposals for a US style internal control attestation are very real questions as to whether responsibilities go far enough and whether there is sufficient guidance for boards, together with sufficiently detailed information from management, to meet these responsibilities effectively. • In particular the guidance does not address the pervasiveness of technology in detail, and boards may not be obtaining sufficient assurance over the effectiveness of IT controls given the complexity and interdependency of the IT infrastructure which exists in many companies today. • The extent of work performed by external auditors is also not well understood - careful questioning of auditors in relation to their audit scope and approach could reveal much about the control environment. • In summary, boards should not wait for further announcements from the Government or FRC/ARGA before taking action in this area, particularly if they are not able to answer the questions which we raise throughout this publication. Internal control and the board: What is all the fuss about? A reminder of the current UK Corporate Governance Code requirements • Overarching board responsibility from Code Principle C: The board should establish a framework of prudent and effective controls, which enable risk to be assessed and managed.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditor Selection Guidance 2020
    STATE OF FLORIDA AUDITOR GENERAL AUDITOR SELECTION AND AUDITOR SELECTION COMMITTEE GUIDANCE EFFECTIVE FOR AUDITS FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021, AND THEREAFTER SEPTEMBER 2021 Table of Contents Auditor Selection Law ....................................................................................................... 1 Auditor Selection Committee Composition and Size ...................................................... 1 Legal Requirements .................................................................................................. 1 Nonmandatory Guidance ........................................................................................... 2 Small Government Considerations ............................................................................ 3 Auditor Selection Committee Responsibilities................................................................. 3 Legal Requirements .................................................................................................. 3 Nonmandatory Guidance .......................................................................................... 3 • Establishment of the Auditor Selection Committee ........................................ 3 • Auditor Selection Committee Responsibilities ................................................ 4 • Communications with the Auditor Selection Committee ................................. 6 Small Government Considerations ............................................................................ 6 Audit Proposal Evaluation Factors ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Committees and Auditor Independence Brochure
    relationships with the company, its officers, directors or significant Change of Independent Auditors shareholders. Thus, audit committees should consider whether the company The auditor generally must be independent for has implemented processes that identify the entire engagement period and the period such prohibited relationships. covered by the financial statements being audited. Once this relationship is terminated, z Certain Financial Relationships. Audit there is no continuing requirement for the auditor committees should be aware that certain to remain independent. The auditor may financial relationships between the generally re-issue its former opinions on the company and the independent auditor company’s financial statements. However, if a are prohibited. These include creditor/ restatement of the financial statements becomes debtor relationships, banking, broker- necessary, the auditor must be independent to dealer, futures commission merchant audit the restatement adjustments and re-issue its accounts, insurance products and opinion. Further, if the Board is contemplating or interests in investment companies. plans a change in auditors, the audit committee Communications Between the Audit must consider whether the prospective firm will be independent during the audit engagement period. Committee and the Independent Auditor That is, the prospective firm must cease all Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 prohibited services and/or sever all prohibited AUDIT COMMITTEES AND requires that the auditor disclose to the audit relationships with the issuer prior to the beginning AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE committee in writing all relationships between of the audit engagement period. Therefore, the the audit firm and the company that may audit committee should consider these issues reasonably be thought to bear on the audit firm’s before hiring a predecessor auditor or a independence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Internal Auditing in Enterprise-Wide Risk Management
    IIA POSITION PAPER: THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDITING IN ENTERPRISE-WIDE RISK MANAGEMENT Issued: January 2009 ERM PP Revised: Page 1 of 8 Introduction The importance to strong corporate governance of managing risk has been increasingly acknowledged. Organizations are under pressure to identify all the business risks they face; social, ethical and environmental as well as financial and operational, and to explain how they manage them to an acceptable level. Meanwhile, the use of enterprise-wide risk management frameworks has expanded, as organizations recognize their advantages over less coordinated approaches to risk management. Internal auditing, in both its assurance and its consulting roles, contributes to the management of risk in a variety of ways. What is Enterprise-wide Risk Management? People undertake risk management activities to identify, assess, manage, and control all kinds of events or situations. These can range from single projects or narrowly defined types of risk, e.g. market risk, to the threats and opportunities facing the organization as a whole. The principles presented in this paper can be used to guide the involvement of internal auditing in all forms of risk management but we are particularly interested in enterprise-wide risk management because this is likely to improve an organization’s governance processes. Enterprise-wide risk management (ERM) is a structured, consistent and continuous process across the whole organization for identifying, assessing, deciding on responses to and reporting on opportunities and threats that affect the achievement of its objectives. Responsibility for ERM The board has overall responsibility for ensuring that risks are managed. In practice, the board will delegate the operation of the risk management framework to the management team, who will be responsible for completing the activities below.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Committee Charter & Checklist
    Audit Committee Charter & Checklist GP Natural Resource Partners LLC Purpose The Audit Committee (the "Committee") is appointed by the Board of Directors of GP Natural Resource Partners LLC (the "Company") to serve as an independent and objective party to: • oversee the quality and integrity of the financial statements, reports and other financial information of Natural Resource Partners L.P. (the "Partnership") that the Partnership provides to any governmental body or to the public; • oversee the Partnership's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; • oversee the independent public accountant's qualifications and independence; • oversee the performance of the independent public accountants; • oversee the performance of the internal audit functions of the Partnership and the Company; • oversee the Partnership's systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics that management and the Board of Directors have established; • prepare on an annual basis a Report of the Audit Committee for inclusion in the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-K; • provide an open avenue of communication among the independent public accountants, financial and senior management, the personnel responsible for internal audit functions, and the Board of Directors, always emphasizing that the independent public accountants are accountable to the Committee; and • perform such other duties as are directed by the Board of Directors and report regularly to the Board of Directors. Consistent with this purpose, the Committee should encourage continuous improvement of, and should foster adherence to, the Partnership's policies, procedures and practices at all levels. Committee Membership The Committee shall be comprised of three or more Directors, as recommended by the Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee and approved by the Board of Directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Brookfield Business Partners Limited Audit Committee Charter
    BROOKFIELD BUSINESS PARTNERS LIMITED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER A committee of the board of directors (the “Board”) of Brookfield Business Partners Limited (the “BBU General Partner”), the general partner of Brookfield Business Partners LP (the “Partnership”), to be known as the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) shall have the following terms of reference: MEMBERSHIP AND CHAIR Annually the Board shall appoint three or more directors (the “Members” and each a “Member”) to serve on the committee for the upcoming year or until the Member ceases to be a director, resigns or is replaced, whichever occurs first. The Members will be selected by the Board on the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee of the BBU General Partner (the “Governance and Nominating Committee”). Any Member may be removed, with or without cause, from office or replaced at any time by the Board. All Members will be Independent directors (as defined below). In addition, every Member will be Financially Literate (as defined below). Members may not serve on more than two other public company audit committees, except with the prior approval of the Chair of the Board. Not more than fifty percent of the Members may be residents of any one jurisdiction (other than Bermuda and any other jurisdiction designated by the Board from time to time). The Board shall appoint one Member as the chair of the Committee (the “Chair”). If the Board fails to appoint a Chair, the Members of the Committee shall elect a Chair by majority vote to serve at the pleasure of the majority. If the Chair is absent from a meeting, the Members shall select a Member from those in attendance to act as Chair of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict of Interest?: Executive-Auditor Relationship and the Likelihood of a SEC- Prompted Restatement Henry Lyford Claremont Mckenna College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2010 Conflict of Interest?: Executive-Auditor Relationship and the Likelihood of a SEC- Prompted Restatement Henry Lyford Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Lyford, Henry, "Conflict of Interest?: Executive-Auditor Relationship and the Likelihood of a SEC-Prompted Restatement" (2010). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 39. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/39 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE Conflict of Interest?: Executive-Auditor Relationship and the Likelihood of an SEC- Prompted Restatement SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR MARC MASSOUD AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY HENRY ANDREW LYFORD FOR SENIOR THESIS FALL 2010 11/29/2010 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………4 INTRODUCTION & RESEARCH MOTIVATION………………………..5 LITERATURE REVIEW & HYPOTHESES……………………………...14 METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………21 DATA & RESULTS……………………………………………………….27 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………….31 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………….34 4 Acknowledgements I would like to extend special thanks to the following parties for aiding me in this study. First, I would like to thank Professor Massoud for his kind, even if sometimes firm, advice and guidance throughout the entire process. He kept me on task and always motivated me to do my best work possible. Secondly, I would like to thank Professor Cronqvist for his invaluable insight concerning research approach and empirical method. He challenged me to think critically about my proxies and regressors in order to make the results as meaningful as possible. I would also like to thank Professor Batta for providing information on useful past studies and sources for data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Audit Committee's Role in Control and Management of Risk
    Mauritius Audit Committee Forum Position Paper 3 The Audit Committee’s Role in Control and Management of Risk December 2015 2 | Mauritius Audit Committee Forum About the Mauritius Audit Committee Forum Recognising the importance of Audit Committees as part of good Corporate Governance, the Mauritius Institute of Directors (MIoD) and KPMG have set up the Mauritius Audit Committee Forum (the Forum) in order to help Audit Committees in Mauritius, in both the public and the private sectors, improve their effectiveness. The Position Paper 3 deals with the Audit Committee's role in control and management of risk. The purpose of the Forum is to serve Audit Committee members and help them adapt to their changing role. Historically, Audit Committees have largely been left on their own to keep pace with rapidly changing information related to governance, risk management, audit issues, accounting, financial reporting, current issues, future changes and international developments. The Forum provides guidance for Audit Committees based on the latest legislative and regulatory requirements. It also highlights best practice guidance to enable Audit Committee members to carry out their responsibilities effectively. To this end, it provides a valuable source of information to Audit Committee members and acts as a resource to which they can turn for information or to share knowledge. The Forum’s primary objective is thus to communicate with Audit Committee members and enhance their awareness and ability to implement effective Audit Committee processes. Position Paper series The Position Papers, produced periodically by the Mauritius Audit Committee Forum, aim to provide Board directors and specifically Audit Committee members with basic best practice guidance notes in running an effective Audit Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management and Internal Controls
    Risk Management and Internal Controls Accounting & Audit Update April 26, 2018 Learning Objectives . Develop an understanding of risks your organization may be facing . Understand the value of enterprise risk management . Know how internal controls can help in addressing risks . Recognize your role in risk management 2 1 Agenda . Overview of Risk Management . The State of Risk Oversight – AICPA & North Carolina Poole College of Management ERM Initiative Study 2017 . COSO ERM Framework . What can I do? 3 Risk Management and IC OVERVIEW 4 2 Introduction . Every choice we make in the pursuit of objectives has its risks. From day- to-day operational decisions to the fundamental trade-offs in the boardroom, dealing with uncertainty in these choices is a part of our operational lives. 5 Risk vs. Uncertainty . Risk – the possibility that event(s) will occur and affect the achievement of strategy and business objectives . Uncertainty – the state of not knowing how or if potential events may manifest 6 3 Variety of Risks & Assessments . Governance . Compliance . Financial . Environmental risk . Operational . Fraud risk . Technology . IT/information . Legal security risk . Reputation . Insurance . Strategic . Investments . HR 7 Governance Risk . Lack of succession planning . Board make-up and structure . Poor advisors . Dysfunctional working relationships between executives and board . Ethical issues . Non-prudent behavior . Changing values 8 4 Financial Risks . Access to/availability of capital . Investment risks . Errors or fraud and financial reporting . Lack of oversight or approvals . Misappropriation of assets . Loss of revenue sources . Loss of key suppliers 9 Operational Risks . Decrease in service quality . Safety . Inadequate internal controls . Lack of accountability by business partners .
    [Show full text]
  • An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements
    An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 1425 AU-C Section 940 An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated With an Audit of Financial Statements Source: SAS No. 130; SAS No. 135; SAS No. 140. Effective for integrated audits for periods ending on or after Decem- ber 15, 2016, unless otherwise indicated. Introduction Scope of This Section .01 This section establishes requirements and provides guidance that ap- plies only when an auditor is engaged to perform an audit of internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) that is integrated with an audit of financial statements (integrated audit). (Ref: par. .A1) .02 Generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) are written in the con- text of an audit of financial statements but are to be adapted as necessary in the circumstances when applied to an audit of ICFR that is integrated with an audit of financial statements.1 This section includes special considerations related to performing an integrated audit. Effective Date .03 This section is effective for integrated audits for periods ending on or after December 15, 2016. Objectives .04 The objectives of the auditor in an audit of ICFR are to a. obtain reasonable assurance about whether material weaknesses exist as of the date specified in management's assessment about the effectiveness of ICFR (as of date)and b. express an opinion on the effectiveness of ICFR in a written re- port, and communicate with management and those charged with governance as required by this section, based on the auditor's find- ings. (Ref: par. .A2–.A4) Definitions .05 For purposes of GAAS, the following terms have the meanings at- tributed as follows: 1 Paragraph .02 of section 200, Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance With Generally Accepted Auditing Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction with the Board
    IPPF – Practice Guide InteractIon wIth the Board auGust 2011 IPPF – Practice Guide Interaction with the Board Table of Contents executive summary ..................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1000 – Purpose, Authority, and Responsibility ........................................... 1 Internal auditing’s relationship with the Board ........................................ 3 A. Frequent Communication with Board Members Between Meetings ....... 3 B. Communicating Sensitive Matters .......................................................... 4 C. International and Industry Considerations .............................................. 5 D. CAE Turnover .......................................................................................... 5 communicating through a risk-based audit Plan ..................................... 5 Board reporting .......................................................................................... 6 A. Key Focus Areas ..................................................................................... 6 B. System of Internal Control ...................................................................... 7 C. Status of Audit Plan and Audit Resources .............................................. 7 D. Distribution of Audit Reports .................................................................. 7 E. Fraud/Investigations .............................................................................
    [Show full text]