February 2006
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2013-2014 Legislative Scorecard
Legislative Scorecard Votes and Leadership 2013-14 LEGISLATIVE SESSION - 1 - This is the inaugural edition of the Environmental League of Massachusetts legislative scorecard. We produced this scorecard to inform citizens about how their legislators voted on important environmental issues. We are pleased and grateful for the support of so many environmental leaders in the legislature. The scorecard relies first on roll call votes on legislation that deals with environmental and energy issues. Because there are so few roll call votes each session—and often these votes are unanimous—we have scored additional actions by legislators to further distinguish environmental champions. Bonus points were awarded to legislators who introduced bills that were ELM priorities or who introduced important amendments, particularly budget amendments to increase funding for state environmental agencies. In addition, we subtracted points for legislators who introduced legislation or amendments that we opposed. We want to recognize leadership and courage, in addition to votes, and have made every attempt to be fair and transparent in our scoring. Much happens during the legislative process that is impractical to score such as committee redrafts, committee votes to move or hold a bill, and measures that would improve flawed legislation. We have not attempted to include these actions, but we recognize that they greatly influence the process and outcomes. None of the bills or amendments scored here should be a surprise to legislators in terms of ELM’s support or opposition. Going forward, ELM will include votes and other actions that support additional revenues for transportation and promote transit, walking and biking. George Bachrach, President Erica Mattison, Legislative Director Highlights of the Session projects. -
Advocacy for Policy Change
Advocacy for Policy Change Brandeis students work to reform Massachusetts law November 2020 Advocacy for Policy Change is a part of a national program, ENACT: The Educational Network for Active Civic Transformation. ENACT was made possible by a generous gift from Ethics Center International Advisory Board Member Norbert Weissberg and his wife, former Board Member Judith Schneider. In spring of 2019 ENACT was awarded a multi-year grant from the Teagle Foundation’s “Education for American Civic Life” initiative to expand to all 50 states and to enhance ENACT’s digital platform. t Norbert Weissberg and Judith Schneider at “Present and Defend: Projects from Advocacy for Policy Change,” April 2011. For more information about the projects in this report, visit www.brandeis.edu/ethics/atbrandeis/advocacy To learn about ENACT: The Educational Network for Active Civic Transformation, and to sign up for updates, visit go.brandeis.edu/ENACT Photos: David J. Weinstein except page 2: Mike Lovett and page 4 (bottom): Evan Berry Editorial Assistant: Elaina Pevide ’20 Table of Contents n Introduction 2 Melissa Stimell n A Message from Jay Kaufman ’68, MA ’73 4 n Required Project Components 5 n Ensuring Equitable Health Coverage for Children 6 Erin Chambers ’20 & Kalianni Neal Desatnik ’20 n Removing Obstacles and Expanding Abortion Access 12 Allia Service ’22 & Emma Wolters’20 n Fair Scheduling of Employees 18 Emily Rae Foreman ’20 & Elaina Pevide ’20 n Preventing Overdose Deaths and Increasing Access to Treatment 24 James Parkhill ’21 & Abby Smurzynski -
View the Vote Chart
UPDATE THE BOTTLE BILL YES! I pledge to help. The Bottle Bill (5¢ deposit on some beverage containers) is the single most successful recycling tool in the country. But the Updated Bottle Bill—adding water, juice and sports drinks to the deposits—is being blocked by powerful business interests on Beacon Hill. The Updated Bottle Bill (H890/S1650) will reduce litter, increase recycling, and save cities and towns money in trash disposal and litter cleanup. In fact, 208 cities and towns, 375 small businesses, and 90 state and local organizations have endorsed our campaign and joined the effort to pass this bill. Despite this overwhelming support, the Updated Bottle Bill has been “bottled up” in the Legislature for more than a decade. It has never been brought to the floor for a vote, and we need your help now. No more delays! Here’s how you can help: STEP 1: To find out the name of your representative and senator, go to www.WhereDoIVoteMA.com STEP 2: Find out where your legislators stand on the Updated Bottle Bill. See the back of this flyer for a complete guide. STEP 3: Call your state senator and representative today. The State House main number is (617) 722- 2000. Ask for your senator (and then call back and ask for your representative). Tell them: “I am a voter in (name your town) and I support the Updated Bottle Bill. There should be no more delays, this bill needs to come up for a vote now.” (If your legislator supports the Updated Bottle Bill, make sure to thank them, if they are undecided or not supporting the bill, ask them to consider supporting the bill.) STEP 4: After you call, please email [email protected] to let us know your legislator’s response. -
Name Office Sought District
The candidates listed below have taken the Commonwealth Environmental Pledge. Name Office Sought District Gerly Adrien State Representative 28th Middlesex Representative Ruth B Balser State Representative 12th Middlesex Bryan P Barash Newton City Council Ward 2 Representative Christine P Barber State Representative 34th Middlesex Alex Bezanson State Representative 7th Plymouth 2nd Suffolk and Senator Will Brownsberger State Senate Middlesex Suezanne Patrice Bruce State Representative 9th Suffolk Michelle Ciccolo State Representative 15th Middlesex Matthew Cohen State Representative 15th Middlesex Hampshire, Franklin Jo Comerford State Senate and Worcester Representative Dan Cullinane State Representative 12th Suffolk Paul Cusack State Representative 2nd Barnstable Senator Julian Cyr State Senate Cape and Islands Representative Michael Day State Representative 31st Middlesex Representative Diana DiZoglio State Senate 1st Essex Christina Eckert State Representative 2nd Essex Representative Lori A. Ehrlich State Representative 8th Essex Middlesex and Senator James Eldridge State Senate Worcester Senator Paul Feeney State Senate Bristol and Norfolk Barnstable, Dukes and Representative Dylan Fernandes State Representative Nantucket 2nd Essex and Barry Finegold State Senate Middlesex Senator Cindy F. Friedman State Senate 4th Middlesex Representative Sean Garballey State Representative 23rd Middlesex Representative Carmine Lawrence Gentile State Representative 13th Middlesex 15 Court Square, Suite 1000, Boston, MA 02108 • (617) 742-0474 • www.elmaction.org Allison Gustavson State Representative 4th Essex Representative Solomon Goldstein-Rose State Representative 3rd Hampshire Tami Gouveia State Representative 14th Middlesex Representative Jim Hawkins State Representative 2nd Bristol Sabrina Heisey State Representative 36th Middlesex Sarah G. Hewins State Representative 2nd Plymouth Representative Natalie Higgins State Representative 4th Worcester Kevin Higgins State Representative 7th Plymouth John Hine State Representative 2nd Hampshire Senator Patricia D. -
MA CCAN 2020 Program FINAL
Source: Ballotpedia Source: Secretary of Commonwealth Massachusetts Senate *Denotes candidate does Candidates not have a website Senate District Democratic Republican Others 1st Bristol and Plymouth District Michael Rodrigues (i)* No candidate 1st Essex District Diana DiZoglio (i) No candidate 1st Essex and Middlesex District No candidate Bruce Tarr (i) 1st Hampden and Hampshire District Eric Lesser (i) No candidate 1st Middlesex District Edward Kennedy (i) No candidate 1st Middlesex and Norfolk District Cynthia Stone Creem (i) No candidate 1st Plymouth and Bristol District Marc Pacheco (i) No candidate 1st Suffolk District Nick Collins (i) No candidate 1st Suffolk and Middlesex District Joseph Boncore (i) No candidate 1st Worcester District Harriette Chandler (i)* No candidate 2nd Bristol and Plymouth District Mark Montigny (i)* No candidate 2nd Essex District Joan Lovely (i) No candidate 2nd Essex and Middlesex District Barry Finegold (i) No candidate 2nd Hampden and Hampshire District John Velis (i) John Cain 2nd Middlesex District Patricia D. Jehlen (i) No candidate 2nd Middlesex and Norfolk District Karen Spilka (i) No candidate 2nd Plymouth and Bristol District Michael Brady (i) No candidate 2nd Suffolk District Sonia Chang-Diaz (i) No candidate 2nd Suffolk and Middlesex District William Brownsberger (i) No candidate 2nd Worcester District Michael Moore (i) No candidate 3rd Essex District Brendan Crighton (i) No candidate 3rd Middlesex District Mike Barrett (i) No candidate 1 Source: Ballotpedia Source: Secretary of Commonwealth -
Letter to Restore Asthma As a Co-Morbidity for COVID-19 Vaccines
February 12, 2021 February 12, 2021 Governor Charles Baker State House, Room 280 24 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02144 Secretary Marylou Sudders Executive OfFice oF Health and Human Services 1 Ashburton Place, 11th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Dear Governor Baker and Secretary Sudders: We write today to urge you to restore moderate to severe asthma to the list oF illnesses which constitute a co-morbidity For COVID-19 vaccine distribution and administration purposes. The CDC currently lists moderate to severe asthma as an illness that could present an increased risk For “severe illness From the virus that causes COVID-19” (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need- extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html). In 2019, Springfield was described as the nation’s number one asthma capitol by the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America (https://www.aafa.org/asthma-capitals-top-100-cities-ranking/). We believe the erroneous removal of moderate to severe asthma From the Massachusetts list oF eligible co-morbidities for phase two of the vaccination distribution must be revisited, especially when it is such a common experience among residents in the Commonwealth. Our own Massachusetts Department of Public Health has been engaged on multiple Fronts with combatting asthma in the Commonwealth, including community-based and medical interventions. Prioritizing asthma as a co-morbidity is a public health and racial equity issue. According to the MDPH, the “prevalence of current asthma in Massachusetts was higher among Black, Non-Hispanic adults than White, non-Hispanic adults.” (https://www.mass.gov/service-details/statistics-about- asthma). We recogniZe the importance oF addressing the disproportionate impact of moderate to severe asthma on black and brown communities in the Commonwealth and request that it be prioritized For vaccine distribution as a COVID-19 co-morbidity. -
January 27, 2021
January 27, 2021 His Excellency Governor Charlie Baker Massachusetts State House 24 Beacon Street Office of the Governor, Room 280 Boston, MA 02133 Delivered Electronically and via Certified Mail Dear Governor Baker, We, the Merrimack Valley Superintendents Association, write to you as a unified group of 22 school superintendents joined in this effort by all 22 of the union presidents in our respective districts, to respectfully request that you reclassify educators and make them eligible to receive COVID-19 vaccinations during Phase 1 of the vaccination process. We cite the guidance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in urging you to prioritize the health and well-being of our educators so that Massachusetts school districts can operate at the fullest possible strength as our nation begins to emerge from this global pandemic. In making our request, we cite the following: 1. Your office and the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) have drawn from the guidance and wisdom of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), which strongly advocates for students to return to, at a minimum, an in-person hybrid learning model. AAP further advocates that students should fully return to the classrooms where and when possible. 2. We, as educators and leaders, recognize and agree that the best place for learning for our children is in the classroom. 3. We have a profound responsibility to support the educational, emotional, physical, and mental well-being of the children across the Commonwealth. 4. First responders, healthcare workers, and educators share a commonality in their work in that they must come into contact with dozens or hundreds of people daily and often cannot be completely socially distant from those they serve. -
1 Warrant Article Explanations Filed By
WARRANT ARTICLE EXPLANATIONS FILED BY PETITIONERS FOR THE MAY 27, 2014 ANNUAL TOWN MEETING ARTICLE 1 Submitted by: Board of Selectmen Article 20 of the November, 2000 Special Town Meeting requires that this be the first article at each Annual Town Meeting. It calls for the Selectmen to appoint two Measurers of Wood and Bark. ARTICLE 2 Submitted by: Human Resources This article is inserted in the Warrant for any Town Meeting when there are unsettled labor contracts. Town Meeting must approve the funding for any collective bargaining agreements. ARTICLE 3 Submitted by: Treasurer/Collector This article authorizes the Town Treasurer to enter into Compensating Balance Agreements, which are agreements between a depositor and a bank in which the depositor agrees to maintain a specified level of non-interest bearing deposits in return for which the bank agrees to perform certain services for the depositor. In order to incorporate such compensating balance agreements into the local budget process, the Commonwealth passed a law in 1986 mandating that all such arrangements be authorized by Town Meeting on an annual basis. ARTICLE 4 Submitted by: Board of Selectmen Section 2.1.4 of the Town's By-Laws requires that each Annual Town Meeting include a warrant article showing the status of all special appropriations. ARTICLE 5 Submitted by: Board of Selectmen This article is inserted in the Warrant for every Town Meeting in case there are any unpaid bills from a prior fiscal year that are deemed to be legal obligations of the Town. Per Massachusetts General Law, unpaid bills from a prior fiscal year can only be paid from current year appropriations with the specific approval of Town Meeting. -
BTU Members on the March for Labor from Left to Right: Steve Tolman, Candidate for Mass
BOSTON TEACHERS UNION, LOCAL 66, AFT Non-Profit Org. Proposed Changes to the 180 Mount Vernon Street U.S. Postage Boston, Massachusetts 02125 PAID Pension System 3 Boston, MA Permit No. 52088 Find Out About a Pre-Tax Benefit for BTU Members 5 BTU Says Welcome Back with a Breast Cancer Walk Fundraiser 12 BostonBostonUnion Teacher The Award-Winning Newspaper of the Boston Teachers Union AFT Local 66, AFL-CIO • Democracy in Education • Volume XLIV, Number 2 • October, 2011 This isn’t Wisconsin… Please Keep Reminding Us! By Richard Stutman, BTU President But the news is overwhelmingly unfa- Legislature ‘Reforms’ he governor has said it. Speaker DeLeo has said it. vorable, at least in the senate’s proposed Our Schools We heard it from many quarters this summer when pension reform version, and in watching T And then there was Ed Reform. the legislature cut our health insurance and we heard it this huge step backward – the first one in Granted, the assault on teacher unions again two weeks ago when the senate proposed cutting more than half a century – one has to think was not quite Wisconsin-like in breadth the pensions of all state employees hired after 12/31/11. that ever so slightly of Wisconsin. After all, or severity. And it did take place before Had Wisconsin happened before the state passed the Ed Wisconsin was just another step though a Wisconsin. But somehow I do not feel Reform legislation 20 months ago, we probably would significant step in the growing legislative relieved. Let’s look at some of the re- have heard it then, too: “This isn’t Wisconsin.” But if it movement to eat away at employee rights forms… double the out-of-district char- isn’t Wisconsin, then what is it? Whatever it is, it cer- and benefits. -
Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance
Massachusetts Office of Campaign and Political Finance Campaign Finance Activity by Candidates for the Massachusetts General Court 2018 INTRODUCTION This study examines campaign finance activity undertaken by candidates for the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representatives (known collectively as The General Court) in calendar year 2018. The Office of Campaign and Political Finance has issued a report of this type after every state election since 1990. The information contained in this legislative study is based on data compiled from campaign finance reports electronically filed by candidates and treasurers of political committees organized on behalf of candidates for the Massachusetts Senate and House. In 2018, 377 candidates sought legislative office and filed disclosure reports with OCPF: 76 running for 40 Senate seats, and 301 seeking one of 160 House seats. Legislative candidates and their committees are required to file three campaign finance reports disclosing election year financial activity. The reports are due with OCPF eight days prior to the state primary election; eight days prior to the November general election; and in January of the year immediately following. Reports were due from the candidates in this study on Aug. 27, 2018, Oct. 29, 2018, and Jan. 21, 2019. Candidates and committee treasurers are required to disclose their account balances at the beginning of each reporting period; receipts and expenditures for the reporting period; in-kind contributions for the reporting period; and all liabilities. OCPF has taken steps to ensure that the information contained in this study is accurate as of the time of its compilation in 2019. This study takes into account many corrections, additions or deletions made by candidates as a result of any review conducted by OCPF or amendments filed by candidates or political committees. -
St. Patrick's Parade in Lawrence
RUMBONEWS.COMMARCH 22, 2014 • EDITION 435 • FREE!LAWRENCE, MATAKE • AÑ OONE 18 .: |Rumbo GRATIS :. 1 Aprueban reforma de finanzas Rumbo Finance reform approved- |5 EDICIÓN NO. 435 (MA) Lawrence, Methuen, Haverhill, Andover, North Andover, Lowell March / Marzo 22, 2014 The BILINGUAL Newspaper of the Merrimack Valley (NH) Salem, Nashua, Manchester St. Patrick’s Parade in Lawrence Vea más fotos en las páginas centrales. See more pictures pages 12-13 Miembros de la Div. 8th, Ancient Order of Hibernians marchan al frente de la parada de San Patricio, llevada a cabo el sábado 15 de Marzo por las calles Parada de San de Lawrence, MA. Patricio en Lawrence Members of Div 8th, Ancient Order of Hibernians leads the Saint Patrick La Parada de San Patricio de este año parade held Saturday, March 15th in Lawrence, MA. resultó como lo que el pueblo esperaba. Cientos de niños de las escuelas públicas desfilaron llevando el colorido que trajo Bringing civic education to Lawrence alegría a los adultos, tanto como a los State Rep.Diana pequeños observadores. DiZoglio (D-Methuen) Algo notable fue la réplica de la Escuela recently visited the Rollins que pasearon orgullosamente. South Lawrence East Muchos maestros trabajaron por más de Middle School (SLE), un mes en su elaboración y amerita una marking the latest stop mención especial en estas páginas. in her Civic Education Tour to engage and *** educate students The St. Patrick’s Parade this year across the Merrimack resulted as what people expected. Valley. |2 Hundreds of children from the public schools participated bringing the colorful Michael Zeytoonian, Rep DiZoglio, Yaiika Cruz displays and joy to adults as well as small observers. -
Who Backs Barack? a Report on the Massachusetts Legislature
WHO BACKS BARACK? A REPORT ON THE MASSACHUSETTS LEGISLATURE BY JOE WILLIAMS & CHARLES BARONE LEGISLATIVE SUPPORT FOR THE OBAMA EDUCATION AGENDA WHO BACKS BARACK? “Our debate seems stuck between those who want to dismantle the system and those who would defend an indefensible status quo, between those who say money makes no difference in education and those who want more money without any demonstration that it will be put to good use.” President Barack Obama, 2010 State of the Union WHAT IS A DFER? Both Democrats and Republicans have failed to address the tragic decline of our system of public education, but it is the Democratic Party - our party - which must question how we allowed ourselves to drift so far from our mission. Fighting on behalf of our nation’s most vulnerable individuals is what our party is supposed to stand for. A Democrat for Education Reform - a DFER - is some- one who supports the lead- ers in our party who have the courage to challenge a failing status quo and who believe that the severity of our nation’s educational crisis demands that we tackle this problem using every possible tool at our disposal. --------------------------- “Education then, beyond all other devices of human origin, is the great equalizer of the conditions of men, the balance-wheel of the social machinery.” Horace Mann EDUCATION REFORM IN MASSACHUSETTS Nearly twenty years ago, Massachusetts Democrats completely transformed government’s relationship to schools. The Education Reform Act of 1993 marked a watershed in the delivery of public education, dramati- cally increasing educational accountability in exchange for more generous funding from the state.