DOCSLIB.ORG

China's Belt and Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
China's Belt and Road Independent Task Force Report No. 79 Report Force Task Independent China’s Belt and Road China’s Belt Independent Task Force Report No. 79 China’s Belt and Road March 2021 March Implications for the United States Jacob J. Lew and Gary Roughead, Chairs Jennifer Hillman and David Sacks, Project Directors Independent Task Force Report No. 79 China’s Belt and Road Implications for the United States Jacob J. Lew and Gary Roughead, Chairs Jennifer Hillman and David Sacks, Project Directors The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with Council members to discuss and debate major international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to- date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S. government. All views expressed in its publications and on its website are the sole responsibility of the author or authors. The Council on Foreign Relations sponsors Independent Task Forces to assess issues of current and critical importance to U.S. foreign policy and provide policymakers with concrete judgments and recommendations. Diverse in backgrounds and perspectives, Task Force members aim to reach a meaningful consensus on policy through private deliberations. Once launched, Task Forces are independent of CFR and solely responsible for the content of their reports. Task Force members are asked to join a consensus signifying that they endorse “the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, though not necessarily every finding and recommendation.” Each Task Force member also has the option of putting forward an additional or a dissenting view. Members’ affiliations are listed for identification purposes only and do not imply institutional endorsement. Task Force observers participate in discussions, but are not asked to join the consensus. For further information about CFR or this Task Force, please write to the Council on Foreign Relations, 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, or call the Communications office at 212.434.9888. Visit our website, CFR.org. Copyright © 2021 by the Council on Foreign Relations®, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This report may not be reproduced in whole or in part, in any form beyond the reproduction permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law Act (17 U.S.C. Sections 107 and 108) and excerpts by reviewers for the public press, without express written permission from the Council on Foreign Relations. This report is printed on paper that is FSC® Chain-of-Custody Certified by a printer who is certified by BM TRADA North America Inc. TASK FORCE MEMBERS Task Force members are asked to join a consensus signifying that they endorse “the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, though not necessarily every finding and recommendation.” They par- ticipate in the Task Force in their individual, not institutional, capacities. B. Marc Allen Oriana Skylar Mastro Freeman Spogli Institute for Charlene Barshefsky International Studies, Stanford WilmerHale University Brendan P. Bechtel Daniel H. Rosen Bechtel Group, Inc. Rhodium Group Charles Boustany Jr. Gary Roughead Capitol Counsel, LLC Hoover Institution, Stanford University L. Reginald Brothers Jr. NuWave Solutions David Sacks Council on Foreign Relations Joyce Chang JPMorgan Chase & Co. Nadia Schadlow Hudson Institute Evan A. Feigenbaum Carnegie Endowment for Rajiv J. Shah International Peace Rockefeller Foundation Jennifer Hillman Kristen Silverberg Council on Foreign Relations Business Roundtable Christopher M. Kirchhoff Taiya M. Smith Schmidt Futures Climate Leadership Council Jacob J. Lew Susan A. Thornton Columbia University’s School of Yale Law School International and Public Affairs Ramin Toloui Natalie Lichtenstein Stanford University Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies Macani Toungara Gary Locke Frederick H. Tsai Bellevue College Liferay iii CONTENTS vi Foreword x Acknowledgments 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 INTRODUCTION 12 Background 17 Implications for the United States 20 FINDINGS 21 Economics 40 Politics 56 Climate Change and Environmental Degradation 62 Security 75 Global Health 82 The U.S. Response to BRI 88 RECOMMENDATIONS 89 Mitigate Economic Risks of BRI 95 Improve U.S. Competitiveness 104 Develop Partnerships and Strengthen Multilateral Organizations to Meet Developing Country Needs 110 Protect U.S. Security Interests in BRI Countries 114 CONCLUSION 116 Endnotes 154 Acronyms 158 Task Force Members 170 Task Force Observers 175 Contributing CFR Staff v FOREWORD Faced with a China that is more repressive at home and more assertive abroad, there is bipartisan support in the United States for a tougher approach to China. This is likely to endure for the foreseeable future. There are, however, competing views regarding China’s ultimate goals and intentions. To some, China is a revisionist power seeking to displace the United States and build a Sinocentric world order and therefore should be countered at every step. Others assess China’s goal as establishing its primacy throughout the Asia-Pacific, while to some China has more limited objectives, largely confined to extending the government’s writ to all territory (including Taiwan) it sees as Chinese. Studying China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is critical to understanding Beijing’s intentions and capabilities. BRI is Chinese President Xi Jinping’s signature foreign policy endeavor and the largest ever global infrastructure undertaking, far surpassing the Marshall Plan. Under the auspices of BRI, Chinese banks and companies have devoted billions of dollars to funding and building roads, power plants, railways, ports, and telecommunications infrastructure in dozens of countries. To some analysts, BRI is China’s primary conduit for pursuing global domination. This Task Force, however, argues that China pursued BRI primarily to address a number of domestic issues, such as closing the gap between the country’s affluent coastal cities and its impoverished interior, absorbing excess manufacturing capacity, putting its accumulated savings to use, and securing inputs for its manufacturing sector. Much of Chinese foreign policy is animated by a drive to bolster domestic political stability, which in turn relies on steady economic growth, and BRI is no exception. vi Foreword Although BRI constitutes a prominent element of Chinese foreign policy, the initiative remains remarkably opaque. BRI has no central governing institution. China has not published a master list of BRI projects, the terms of which are often negotiated behind closed doors and kept secret. When projects run into trouble, Beijing often pressures countries to keep all renegotiations private. This Task Force has done much to peel back the curtain, analyzing what is known about BRI and piecing together a comprehensive view of the initiative. The Task Force finds that BRI worryingly adds to countries’ debt burdens, locks countries into carbon-intensive futures, tilts the playing field in major markets toward Chinese companies, and draws countries into tighter economic and political relationships with Beijing. It concludes that “the risks for both the United States and recipient countries raised by BRI’s implementation considerably outweigh its benefits.” The Task Force assesses that BRI poses a significant challenge to U.S. interests, as it has the potential to displace American companies from BRI countries, set technical standards that are incompatible with U.S. products, push countries to politically align with China, and pressure countries to withhold access to U.S. forces during a potential crisis. The Task Force also looks at how the COVID-19 pandemic is reshaping BRI, providing one of the first comprehensive analyses of BRI in a COVID and post-COVID world. The Task Force argues that the pandemic “has revealed the flaws of China’s BRI model, forcing a reckoning with concerns that many BRI projects are not economically viable and elevating questions of debt sustainability.” BRI is likely to emerge from the pandemic as a more slimmed-down, cost-effective, and technology-focused undertaking, but it is not going away. Foreword vii The pandemic has made
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020
    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Solutionsin Building CPEC-A Flagship Of
    Issue , Working paper CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE Challenges and CHINA-PAKISTAN ECONOMIC CORRIDORSolutionsIn Building CPEC-A Flagship of BRI Written by: Yasir Arrfat Research Coordinator CoE CPEC Minitry of Planning, Pakistan Institute Development Reform of Development Economics Challenges and Solutions in Building CPEC-A Flagship of BRI Yasir Arrfat Research Coordinator Centre of Excellence (CoE) for China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Islamabad, Pakistan, [email protected] Abstract-One of the OBOR pilot corridors out of the six corridors is CPEC. The CPEC has been initiated in 2013 and due to its speedy progress, CPEC is now vastly considered as the “flagship” project among the OBOR projects. The CPEC initiatives include; development of Gwadar Port, road, rail and optical fiber connectivity, energy corridor and Special Economic Zones development for bilateral benefits to attain inclusive growth and regional harmonization. Before the inception of CPEC, the growth of Pakistan was curtailed by two major bottlenecks; acute energy shortages and weak local and regional connectivity infrastructures. In 2013, CPEC came with 59 billion USDs under OBOR and it has been eliminating all major economic bottlenecks. This paper sheds light on the BRI with deep focusing on CPEC. It further represents the Pakistan’s improving economic indicators through CPEC. This paper will also examine some key challenges and their solutions in building CPEC. Key Words-BRI, Challenges, Connectivity, Corridors, CPEC, Global Competitive Index (GCI), Investment, Infrastructure, OBOR I. INTRODUCTION The Globalization has brought vast changes in global economy and has directed the evolution to a boundary less development. This phenomenon has significantly amplified the maritime trade from 2.37 billion tons of freight to 5.88 billion tons of freight moving through maritime routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Investment in the Port of Piraeus, Greece: the Relevance for the EU and the Netherlands
    Chinese Investment in the Port of Piraeus, Greece: The Relevance for the EU and the Netherlands Frans-Paul van der Putten Clingendael Report Chinese Investment in the Port of Piraeus, Greece: The Relevance for the EU and the Netherlands Frans-Paul van der Putten Senior Research Fellow [email protected] Clingendael Report 14 February 2014 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holders. Clingendael Institute P.O. Box 93080 2509 AB The Hague The Netherlands Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.clingendael.nl/ Contents Summary 7 Abbreviations used in this Report 9 Introduction 10 1. Cosco and Piraeus as an Emerging Regional Hub 11 Corporate Profile and Operations 11 The Potential for Expansion 15 The Pioneering Role of Hewlett-Packard’s Distribution Activities at Piraeus 18 2. China’s Interests in the Region 21 3. EU–China Relations 24 Economic Significance for the EU 25 4. Cosco as a State-Owned Enterprise 28 Possible Political Relevance 29 5. The Relevance for Dutch Economic Interests 32 Conclusions 34 Interviews 35 Summary This report aims to provide a preliminary insight into how Cosco’s activities in Piraeus are relevant for: a) EU–China relations; and b) Dutch economic interests. Regarding EU– China relations, the report focuses on implications for trade flows and the relevance of the fact that Cosco is a state-owned company.
    [Show full text]
  • International Geneva
    International Geneva Directory of Geneva Global Health Actors World Economic Forum | WEF http://www.weforum.org and https://www.weforum.org/system-initiatives/shaping-the-future- of-health-and-healthcare 91- 93 Route de la Capite | CH-1223 Cologny | Geneva Tel +41 22 869 1212 | Fax +41 22 786 2744 | mail: [email protected] BACKGROUND AND MISSION The World Economic Forum is an independent international organisation committed to improving the state of the world by engaging leaders in partnerships to shape global, regional and industry agendas. WEF is best known for its annual meeting in Davos-Klosters, Switzerland. The organisation is impartial, independent and not tied to any specific agendas, governments or interests. It is an officially recognised International Institution for Public- Private Cooperation, being the only international organisation serving in this role. AREAS OF INTEREST Changing economy and the fourth industrial revolution Global commons Global security Public-private partnerships HEALTH-RELATED ACTIVITIES Global health is one of the priority areas of WEF, and the Shaping the Future of Health and Healthcare system initiative provides a framework for health promotion and disease prevention along with broad networks and opportunities for public-private cooperation. It aims to ensure that people are healthier and can access the necessary care to fulfil their potential. It addresses the challenge of providing health for the expanding global population, and focuses on both individual and community-related aspects of health. Its global platform includes stakeholders from public, private and civil society spheres, with focus on health, food and beverages, sports, insurance, telecommunications and infra-structure. The goal is to create a credible long term narrative that considers health and health security as an integral part of economic growth and profitability, and to share insights and knowledge arising from the discussions for shaping the global health agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on China-Laos Cooperation Opportunities Under the Belt and Road Initiative in 2018 China Economic Information Service
    Report on China-Laos Cooperation Opportunities under the Belt and Road Initiative in 2018 China Economic Information Service Xinhua Silk Road Department 1 Contents Abstract......................................................................................................................................3 1. Substantial Achievements in Trade and Economic Cooperation.....................................5 (1) Rapid growth of bilateral trade and economic relations....................................................... 5 (2) Expansion of cooperation in the field of investment............................................................ 6 (3) Unique advantages of project contracting.............................................................................8 (4) Remarkable achievements in financial cooperation..............................................................9 (5) Aids to Laos to stimulate its demand...................................................................................11 2. The Belt and Road Initiative provides constant dynamics for China-Laos trade and economic cooperation............................................................................................................. 12 (1) Mutual connectivities shortens the distance between China and Laos...............................12 i. The railway facilitates Lao dream of a “land-linked country”....................................... 12 ii. The satellite connects Laos with the world.................................................................. 13 (2) Production
    [Show full text]
  • (BRI) in Myanmar
    MYANMAR POLICY BRIEFING | 22 | November 2019 Selling the Silk Road Spirit: China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Myanmar Key points • Rather than a ‘grand strategy’ the BRI is a broad and loosely governed framework of activities seeking to address a crisis in Chinese capitalism. Almost any activity, implemented by any actor in any place can be included under the BRI framework and branded as a ‘BRI project’. This allows Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and provincial governments to promote their own projects in pursuit of profit and economic growth. Where necessary, the central Chinese government plays a strong politically support- ive role. It also maintains a semblance of control and leadership over the initiative as a whole. But with such a broad framework, and a multitude of actors involved, the Chinese government has struggled to effectively govern BRI activities. • The BRI is the latest initiative in three decades of efforts to promote Chinese trade and investment in Myanmar. Following the suspension of the Myitsone hydropower dam project and Myanmar’s political and economic transition to a new system of quasi-civilian government in the early 2010s, Chinese companies faced greater competition in bidding for projects and the Chinese Government became frustrated. The rift between the Myanmar government and the international community following the Rohingya crisis in Rakhine State provided the Chinese government with an opportunity to rebuild closer ties with their counterparts in Myanmar. The China-Myanmar Economic Corridor (CMEC) was launched as the primary mechanism for BRI activities in Myanmar, as part of the Chinese government’s economic approach to addressing the conflicts in Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY i CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia October 2015 Thomas Zimmerman NEW YORK UNIVERSITY CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The world faces old and new security challenges that are more complex than our multilateral and national institutions are currently capable of managing. International cooperation is ever more necessary in meeting these challenges. The NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC) works to enhance international responses to conflict, insecurity, and scarcity through applied research and direct engagement with multilateral institutions and the wider policy community. CIC’s programs and research activities span the spectrum of conflict, insecurity, and scarcity issues. This allows us to see critical inter-connections and highlight the coherence often necessary for effective response. We have a particular concentration on the UN and multilateral responses to conflict. Table of Contents The New Silk Roads: China, the U.S., and the Future of Central Asia Thomas Zimmerman Acknowledgments 2 Foreword 3 Introduction 6 The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor 9 Chinese Engagement with Afghanistan 11 Conclusion 18 About the Author 19 Endnotes 20 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences (SASS) for its support during the research and writing of this paper, particularly Professor Pan Guang and Professor Li Lifan. I would also like to thank Director Li Yihai, and Sun Weidi from the SASS Office for International Cooperation, as well as Vice President Dong Manyuan, and Professor Liu Xuecheng of the China Institute for International Studies. This paper benefited greatly from the invaluable feedback of a number of policy experts, including Klaus Rohland, Andrew Small, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Regional Effects and Recommendations for Sustainable Development and Trade
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 45 Number 4 Article 3 April 2020 The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Regional Effects and Recommendations for Sustainable Development and Trade Shirin Lakhani Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Shirin Lakhani, The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Regional Effects and Recommendations for Sustainable Development and Trade, 45 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 417 (2017). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE CHINA-PAKISTAN ECONOMIC CORRIDOR: REGIONAL EFFECTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND TRADE By: Shirin Lakhani' In November 2003, China and Pakistan signed a Joint Declaration of Cooperation outlining their bilateral intent to promote trade and economic development.' In 2006, these nations composed and signed the Pakistan-China Free Trade Agreement (FTA) according to World Trade Organization (WTO) guidelines. 2 It was not until April 2015, when Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Pakistan, that the fruits of these agreements came to blossom. During this visit, China and Pakistan signed 51 agreements, memorandums of understanding (MoUs), and financing contracts, signaling the beginning of what is now known as the China- Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). CPEC is a $51 billion Chinese investment to develop Pakistan's infrastructure, transportation, and energy sectors.4 Approximately 80% of the projects are energy- related, with the remaining 20% dedicated to expanding existing infrastructure.s The Corridor will link Kashgar to Gwadar, providing China with a direct route to the Persian Gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • Piraeus Port Authority S.A. Annual Financial Report
    PIRAEUS PORT AU THORITY S.A. ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 (IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE L. 3556/2007) WorldReginfo - 4aac7156-b0aa-428d-be03-ee017797d73b PIRAEUS PORT AUTHORITY S.A Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 2018 (amounts in Euro unless stated otherwise) Index to the Annual Financial Report PAGE STATEMENTS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ....................................................................................................... 3 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS .............................................................................................................................. 4 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................................................... 53 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ................................................................................................................................................. 61 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ................................................................. 67 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2018 .................................................................................................. 68 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ......................................................................... 69 CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What Does (Not) Make Soft Power Work: Domestic Institutions and Chinese Public Diplomacy in Central Europe
    What Does (Not) Make Soft Power Work: Domestic Institutions and Chinese Public Diplomacy in Central Europe By Eszter Pálvölgyi-Polyák Submitted to Central European University Department of International Relations In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations Supervisor: Professor Erin Kristin Jenne Budapest, Hungary 2018 CEU eTD Collection Word count: 17,242 Abstract What does make soft power policies work in a certain context? In this thesis, I attempt to answer this question in the context of Chinese public diplomacy activities in the Central European region. In the past decade, China expressed increasing interest in this region, however, the same public diplomacy approach did not bring unitary response in different countries. The framework of the thesis relies on the conceptualizations of soft power, the literature on the determinants of success in soft power, and the domestic factors influencing a country’s foreign policy. The methodological approach used in the analysis is in-case process tracing. The two case countries, Hungary and the Czech Republic are selected on the basis of their similarities which act as control variables. While the soft power policies have multiple effects on the subject countries which are hard to predict, I provide an account which explains the success or failure of soft power through the domestic structure of the subject country. CEU eTD Collection i Acknowledgements I want to express my gratitude to every person who helped the development of this thesis in any way. My gratitude first and foremost goes to my supervisor, Professor Erin Jenne, who guided my research and helped to transform vague ideas into a tangible thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • LABORATORY for MARITIME TRANSPORT Annual Report 2008 Contents
    NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS SCHOOL OF NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND MARINE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF SHIP DESIGN AND MARITIME TRANSPORT LABORATORY FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT ANNUAL REPORT 2008 http://www.martrans.org June 2009 Laboratory for Maritime Transport National Technical University of Athens 9, Iroon Polytechneiou str 15773 Zografou , Greece Website: www.martrans.org NTUA - LABORATORY FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT Annual Report 2008 Contents Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................2 1.1 About LMT .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 About this report .................................................................................................................. 2 2. Year 2008 Highlights ..........................................................................3 2.1 LMT wins "Piraeus International Centre Award"................................................................ 3 2.2 LMT and IMO business .......................................................................................................4 2.3 LMT at OECD Round Table................................................................................................ 5 2.4 LMT at SNAME Greek Section........................................................................................... 5 2.5 LMT at WMU SAR Workshop in Malmö........................................................................... 5 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Silk Road in Central Asia: Present and Future
    Digital Silk Road in Central Asia: Present and Future NARGIS KASSENOVA & BRENDAN DUPREY, EDITORS JUNE 2021 Digital Silk Road in Central Asia: Present and Future Nargis Kassenova & Brendan Duprey, Editors JUNE 2021 Digital Silk Road in Central Asia: Present and Future is a project of the Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies at Harvard University, and the Sustainable Kazakhstan Research Institute, Narxoz University, supported by a grant from Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Kazakhstan. © 2021 Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies Cataloging-in-Publication data ISBN: 978-0-578-93435-8 Please direct inquiries to: Nargis Kassenova Kathryn W. and Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies Harvard University 1730 Cambridge Street, Suite S301 Cambridge, MA 02138 Phone: 617.496.5684 Fax: 617.495.8319 [email protected] The full text of this report can be accessed at https://daviscenter.fas.harvard.edu/digital-silk-road. Limited print copies are also available. ii Digital Silk Road in Central Asia: Present and Future Contents iv Acknowledgements v Introduction Nargis Kassenova and Brendan Duprey vii Executive Summary 1 The Puzzle of the Digital Silk Road Elisa Oreglia, Hongyi Ren, and Chia-Chi Liao 9 Sino-Russian Advocacy for “Internet Sovereignty” and State-Led Internet Governance Miranda Lupion 17 Digital Silk Road and Surveillance Technology in Central Asia Cian Stryker 55 The Sino-Russian Digital Cooperation and Its Implications for Central Asia Miranda Lupion 77 Beyond the GovTech: The Pitfalls of Kazakhstan’s Digitalization Agenda Anna Gussarova 85 Turkmenistan’s Digitalization Strategy: Old Practices, New Façade? Rustam Muhamedov 93 The Role of Big Earth Data for the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in Central Asia Brendan Duprey and Akmal Akramkhanov 118 About the Authors Contents iii Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Kazakhstan for providing moral and financial support to the project.
    [Show full text]