Arxiv:1602.01083V1 [Gr-Qc]

uut1,21 23:58 2018 10, August

arXiv:1602.01083v1 [gr-qc] 2 Feb 2016 el(W pc-iesmercgnrlzto fteHamil the of theory generalization field symmetric space-time (DW) Weyl norpeiu papers previous our In Introduction 1. sbsdo h ahmtclsrcue fteD Hamiltonia DW the ( of polysymplectic structures the mathematical the on based is oueeeet,aerpeetdb iesols element dimensionless by forms, represented differential are by elements, volume represented variables dynamical the edtere in theories field ler ffntosfntoaso h hs pc ntec the in space phase the theory). mechanics/field on functions/functionals for of differential of algebra class certain a by represented variables eial rmpeaoia uniaini h ii fth of limit the in volume” quantization precanonical from derivable tnadQT otepeetdsrpino ed s“multi- as Schrödinger representa fields functional the of in description QFT present standard the The o to number infinite QFT) continually standard the numbers to complex generalization of its algebra (and the generalizes correspo the algebra t - on (Dirac) variable theory time the the enter of analog coordinates multidimensional space-time u the the As without theory time. field and to mechanics in coordinate space space-time configuration and operato coordinates field and of functions space wave sional algebra-valued Clifford of terms hefs hoe nPeaoia uniaino ilsa Fields of Quantization Precanonical in Theorem Ehrenfest ee efis ics h rcnnclqatzto finte of quantization precanonical the discuss first we Here, uniain eDne-elter;vebi rvt;Cl limit. gravity; classical vielbein orem; theory; Donder-Weyl De quantization; conn Keywords spin in the term with connection Schrödinger equation the of precanonical identify values the to of us expectation allows of th also from equations It scalar operators emerge the interacting equations as field an quantization classical ical of the of consideration how values shows preceding expectation space-time of The equations theory. as erators. field derived to are formalism equations Hamiltonian proceeds the which of gravity generalization vielbein of quantization canonical edsusagnrlzto fteErnettermt h rece the to theorem Ehrenfest the of generalization a discuss We κ 1 , 3 6 unu edter ncre pc-ie unu gravity; quantum space-time; curved in theory field Quantum : sabsso edqatzto.Teresulting The quantization. field of basis a as hc per ntefraimo rcnnclquantizatio precanonical of formalism the in appears which colo hsc n srnm,Uiest fS Andrews, St of University Astronomy, and Physics of School n iesos n h oso-esehbragbao dynam of algebra Poisson-Gerstenhaber the and dimensions) n 1-om(eeaiigtesmlci -omi mechanics in 2-form symplectic the (generalizing +1)-form 1,2 4 tlast h omlto faqatmter ffilsin fields of theory quantum a of formulation the to leads It ehv enepoigteptnilo h eDonder- De the of potential the exploring been have we tAdesK1 S,Scotland 9SS, KY16 Andrews St ∗ -al [email protected] E-mail: grV Kanatchikov V. Igor SCPoedns-97i 6.5in x 9.75in - Proceedings WSPC ∗ rmasaetm symmetric space-time a from ffr ler;Ernetthe- Ehrenfest algebra; ifford s(eeaiigtePoisson the (generalizing ms h orsodn quantum corresponding the h oain generalization covariant the ection. rcnnclqatmop- quantum precanonical lsia Einstein-Palatini Classical s, rcnnclquantization precanonical dn pc-ieClifford space-time nding ere ffedm the freedom, of degrees f aihn “elementary vanishing e 1,2 fCiodalgebra. Clifford of s edter ncurved on theory field hc r infinitesimal are which tion so h nt dimen- finite the on rs nqatmmechanics quantum in eut fprecanon- of results e atn clrfilson fields scalar racting nnclfraimof formalism anonical eeulfoig-a a as - footing equal he ulsltigt space to splitting sual hc eeaie the generalizes which omls,sc as such formalism, n oinfraimto formalism tonian typooe pre- proposed ntly eprl systems. temporal” 5 a hw obe to shown was precanonical dGravity nd when n ical to 1 yg4er ae1 page mymg14-ehr8 August 10, 2018 23:58 WSPC Proceedings - 9.75in x 6.5in mymg14-ehr8 page 2

the curved space-time background and show how the classical ﬁeld equations in DW Hamiltonian form are derived from precanonical quantization as the equations of expectation values of quantum operators. Then we brieﬂy outline the precanonical quantization of vielbein general relativity in Palatini formulation and sketch out the derivation of the classical Einstein-Palatini equations in DW Hamiltonian form from the precanonical quantization of gravity as the equations of expectation values of the corresponding operators. That generalizes the Ehrenfest theorem to the precanonical quantization of gravity. 7,9 Further details of the derivation will be presented elsewhere. 8 The concise presentation here is dictated by the limitations of the proceedings format of this paper. The reader is advised to consult the previous papers by the author for the notation, terminology, concepts, and the formalism underlying the precanonical quantization, which are used here mostly without explanation. A companion paper 10 may serve as a brief introduction.

2. Ehrenfest Theorem in curved space-time Let us consider interacting scalar ﬁelds on a curved space-time background gµν (x):

1 µν a L = √gg ∂µy ∂ν ya √gV (y), (1) 2 −

where g := det gµν and the parametric dependences from x are henceforth not | | written down explicitly. Our purpose here is to present the DW Hamiltonian formulation, the resulting precanonical quantization of the system, and then to show that the latter reproduces the DW Hamiltonian equations as the equations on the expectation values of the corresponding operators. The polymomenta and the DW Hamiltonian density obtained from (1):

pµ µν H 1 pµpaν a = √gg ∂µya, = √gH = 2√g gµν a + √gV (y), (2) are densities which parametrically depend on the space-time coordinates x via gµν (x)-s. The DW Hamiltonian form of the Euler-Lagrange equations reads

µ a dµp (x) = ∂aH, dµy (x) = ∂ µ H, (3) a − pa

µ a µ µ where dµ is the total diﬀerentiation w.r.t. x and ∂a := ∂/∂y , ∂pa := ∂/∂pa . Precanonical quantization of this system leads to the representations

µ µ 1 2 2 a pˆ = i~κ√gγ ∂a, Hˆ = ~ κ ∂a∂ + V (y), (4) a − − 2 where the curved-space γµ-matrices are x-dependent: γµγµ + γµγµ = 2gµν , while the DW Hamiltonian operator turns out to be independent from x-s. The curved space-time covariant generalization of the precanonical Schr¨odinger equation takes the form

µ i~κγ µΨ(y,x) = Hˆ Ψ(y,x), (5) ∇ August 10, 2018 23:58 WSPC Proceedings - 9.75in x 6.5in mymg14-ehr8 page 3

where µ := ∂µ + ωµ with the connection ωµ is a covariant derivative of Clifford ∇ 0 0 algebra-valued wave functions. For the conjugate wave function Ψ:=¯γ Ψ†γ¯ we obtain: ← µ i~κΨ(∂µ +ωµ)γ = Hˆ Ψ, (6) − 0 0 I where Ψ :=γ ¯ Ψ†γ¯ ,γ ¯ (I = 0,...,n 1) are flat-space Dirac matrices, such that I J J I IJ IJ − 0 0 γ¯ γ¯ +¯γ γ¯ = 2η , η is the fiducial flat-space metric, ωµ :=γ ¯ ωµ† γ¯ , and a 0 0 generalized Hermicity of Hˆ is assumed: Hˆ =Hˆ :=¯γ Hˆ †γ¯ . From (5) and (6) we obtain the covariant conservation law

µ dµ dy Tr Ψ√gγ Ψ =0, (7) Z 1 IJ 11 provided ωµ satisfies the known property of the spin connection ωµ = 4 ωµ γ¯IJ : µ µ µ ∂µ(√gγ ) = √gωµγ + √gγ ωµ. (8) Now, from (4), (5), (6) and (8), we obtain: µ ~κ µ ~κ µ dµ pâ = i dµ dy Tr Ψ√gγ ∂aΨ = i dy Tr ∂µΨ√gγ ∂aΨ h i − Z − Z µ µ + Ψ∂a√gγ ∂µΨ + Ψ∂µ(√gγ )∂aΨ = dy Tr Ψ[∂a, Hˆ]Ψ = ∂aHˆ . − Z −h i Therefore, the first DW Hamiltonian equation in (3) is fulfilled on average. Next, we note that (3b) can be reformulated in terms of the covariant derivative µ µν and an x-dependent contravariant (n–1)-volume element ̟ := g ̟ν , where ̟ν := 0 n 1 ı∂ (dx ... dx − ): ν ∧ ∧ a µ a µ 1 a µ µ µ(y ̟ ) = dµ(y ̟ ) + y ∂µ(ln g)̟ = ∂pν H̟ . (9) ∇ 2 a µ 1 µ Using the representation ̟ (x) = κ γ (x), and setting here ~=1, κ =1, we obtain

\a µ a µ a µ a µ dµ y ̟ = dy Trb ∂µΨy γ Ψ + Ψy γ ∂µΨ + Ψy (∂µγ )Ψ h i Z ← = dy Tr Ψ i Hˆ ω γµ yaΨ Ψya iHˆ +iγµω Ψ + ~κΨya(i∂ γµ)Ψ Z µ µ µ − − = dy Tr Ψ[H,iyˆ a]Ψ+iΨ ∂ γµ ω γµ γµω yaΨ Z µ µ µ − − a 1 a µ \ ν 1 a µ = i∂ y γ ∂µ(ln g) = ∂pν H̟ y γ ∂µ(ln g), (10) h− i − 2 h i h a i − 2 h i thus reproducing on average the second DW Hamiltonian equation in (3) in the form (9), if ωµ satisfies the condition (8) and hence can be identified with the spin connection. Therefore, the analog of the Ehrenfest theorem for the precanonically quantized scalar fields on curved space-time is satisfied as the consequence of (i) the covariant precanonical Schrödinger equation (5) and its conjugate (6), (ii) the precanonical representation of operators (4), (iii) the definition of the scalar product related to the conservation law (7), and (iv) the property (8) of the connection term in (5), which allows us to identify it with the spin connection (the Fock-Ivanenko coefficients). August 10, 2018 23:58 WSPC Proceedings - 9.75in x 6.5in mymg14-ehr8 page 4

3. Precanonical quantization of vielbein gravity and the Ehrenfest Theorem Here we follow our earlier work 12 (cf. Refs. 13 for an earlier work using the metric formulation). The Einstein-Palatini Lagrangian density with the cosmological term

1 [α β] IJ IK J 1 µ 1 L = κ eeI eJ ∂αωβ + ωα ωβK + κ Λe, e := (det eI )− , (11) || || µ IJ treats the vielbein components eI and the spin connection coeﬃcients ωα as independent ﬁeld variables. The DW Hamiltonian formulation leads to the polymo- α α menta pe and pω, and the DW Hamiltonian density H=:eH derived from (11):

α α 1 [α β] 1 [α β] IK J 1 p β p IJ e H e e (a): e 0, (b): ω κ eI eJ , (c): = κ eI eJ ωα ωβK κ Λ . (12) I ≈ β ≈ − − The primary constraints (12a,b) are second-class, because the brackets of their α α 1 [α β] β ̟ , IJ − e e ̟ associated (n–1)-forms Ce := p β α Cω := pωIJ κ e I J α are not all van- I eI β β ishing:

1 [α β] [Ce, Ce′ ] = 0 = [Cω, Cω′ ] , [C γ , C IJ ] = ∂ γ ee e ̟α =: C γ IJ . (13) eK ωβ κ eK I J eK ωβ { } { } { } − Einstein’s equations are derived from (11) by varying ω and e independently:

α β [α β] IJ IK J δω : α ee e =0, δe: ∂ µ ee e (∂αωβ + ωα ωβK ) + Λe =0. (14) [I J] eM I J ∇ The former equation deﬁnes the spin connection in terms of vielbeins, and the latter one is the vacuum Einstein’s equation in vielbein formulation. In the DW Hamiltonian formulation these equations can be written in the form:

α α IJ γ (a): dαpωIJ = ∂ωIJ H, (b): Ceγ ωIJ d[αωβ] = ∂e H, (15) β − β K β − K

α where Ceω =: C ̟α and the total (on-shell) derivative d also implies a restriction to eω α α ∂pω (e) ∂e the subspace of constraints (12), e.g. dαpω = ∂e ∂xα . Note that this formulation is inspired by the generalized Dirac analysis 9,12,14 of the DW Hamiltonian system with the constraints (12).

Quantization yields the representation of the operators of vielbeins and polymo- β ~κ J ∂ ˆα ~2κ2 KL ∂ ∂ menta:e Î = i κγ¯ ∂ωIJ , pωIJ = κê γ¯ ∂ωKL ∂ωIJ , which act on Clifford- − β β − [α β] IJ µ valued precanonical wave functions Ψ = Ψ(ωα ,x ) on the (total space of the) configuration bundle of spin connections over the space-time. For the operator of the DW Hamiltonian density H=:eH restricted to the surface of constraints C given α IK J 1 . . by (12): (eH) C = pωIJ ωα ωβK κ Λe, we obtain (up to an ordering .....) | − β −

ˆ ~2κ2 IJ . KM L . 1 H = κ γ¯ . ω[α ωβ]M ∂ωIJ ∂ωKL . Λ. (16) α β − κ August 10, 2018 23:58 WSPC Proceedings - 9.75in x 6.5in mymg14-ehr8 page 5

Precanonical Schr¨odinger equation for quantum gravity: i~κ / Ψ=Hˆ Ψ, where ∇ µ 1 IJ µ I µ ~κ IJ / :=γ (∂µ + ωµIJ γ¯ ) and γ :=¯γ eˆ = i κγ¯ ∂ωIJ (cf. (5)),b now reads ∇ 4 I − µ b bIJ IJ . 1 b KL K ML . γ¯ ∂ IJ ∂µΨ+¯γ . ωµKLγ¯ ωµM ω ∂ KL ∂ IJ .Ψ + λΨ=0, (17) ωµ . 4 β ωµ ωβ . − Λ where λ := (~κκ)2 is a dimensionless constant which combines three diﬀerent scales: cosmological, Planck, and the UV scale κ introduced by precanonical quantization. 0 0 The conjugate wave function Ψ:=¯γ Ψ†γ¯ obeys

IJ . 1 KL IJ K ML← ← . ∂ IJ ∂µΨ¯γ Ψ. ωµKLγ¯ γ¯ + ωµM ω KL IJ . λΨ=0. (18) ωµ . 4 β ∂ ωβ ∂ ωµ . − − The scalar product of precanonical wave functions is given by

1 n(n+1) 1 n(n 1) IJ Φ Ψ := Tr Φ [dω]Ψ, [dω]=i 2 − ˆe− − dωµ , (19) h | i Z Y d d µ,I

∂ Ψêγˆµ[dω]Ψ = ∂ Ψêγˆµ[dω]Ψ + Ψêγˆµ[dω]∂ Ψ µ Z Z µ Z µ c c c . ← . . . = Ψ. iHˆ ω γˆ←µ ê[dω].Ψ Ψ.[dω]ê iHˆ +γ ˆµω .Ψ (22) Z . µ . Z . µ . − − c. µ cµ . = ... = .ê ωµγˆ + êγˆ ωµ. , h i is equivalent to the fulfillment on average of the property (8) of curved-space Dirac µ matrices and spin connection, because the left hand side of (22) is ∂µ êγˆ . As h i eq. (8) is a consequence of the first of the Einstein-Palatini equations in (15), the result in (22) can be seen as a first indication that our precanonical quantization is consistent in the classical limit at least with the classical geometry underlying GR. Note, however, that we had to omit several essential intermediate details in the calculation of (22). The most important one is that the terms with Λ do not cancel on their own, that would lead to the violation of the covariant probability conservation law due to the cosmological constant. Though it might sound plausible, August 10, 2018 23:58 WSPC Proceedings - 9.75in x 6.5in mymg14-ehr8 page 6

we think that the true message here is that the cosmological constant, which was introduced in the classical Lagrangian (11), should be cancelled by the constants . . generated by a proper choice of the ordering inside ...... This cancellation yields a prediction of the admissible value of Λ, though in terms of an yet unspeciﬁed scale κ introduced by precanonical quantization, 12 and ﬁxes the ordering ambiguity in ˆ . . H by requiring .ωω∂ω ∂ω. to be anti-Hermitean.

Ehrenfest theorem for the Einstein’s equations can be obtained now for the DW Hamiltonian form of the latter (15). By proceeding similarly to (22), we obtain

α ~κ α dα pˆωIJ = i ∂α Tr Ψˆeγˆ ∂ωIJ [dω]Ψ = ... = ∂ωIJ H , (23) h β i − Z β −h β i d b that reproduces the ﬁrst of the Einstein-Palatini equations, eq. (15a), on average. The Einstein’s equations proper, eq. (15b), are more tricky to obtain as the α IJ α IJ α IJ Ehrenfest-type statement. Using Ceγ ωIJ d[αωβ] =dα Ceγ ωIJ ωβ dα Ceγ ωIJ ωβ , K β K β − K β eq. (15a), the expression of Ceω in (13), and the constraint (12b), the Einstein’s equations can be cast in the form more suitable for us: α IJ dα C γ IJ ω = ∂ γ H. (24) e ω β eK K β The construction of the operators involved in (24) makes use of the observations

\γ KL ˆ α IJ that (i) ∂e A=q[i ωγ γ¯L, A], where q is a numerical/sign factor, (ii) Ceγ ωIJ ωβ K K β ≈ γ IJ α α α α ν a ∂e ωβ pωIJ (e) , and (iii) for any A , dαA = dα(dx A ̟ν ). Using the − K β • [ ν n 1 µ \ν representations dx = ( 1) − κγˆ (cf. Ref. 7) and pω ̟ν = i~∂ω, we get • − − α\ IJ ~ . α KL . Ceγ ωIJ ωβ = i q.γˆ ωγ γ¯L.. K β − Now, using the precanonical Schr¨odinger equation (17) and its conjugate (18), we obtain

\ α . KL . . . α IJ ~ . . .\γ . dα Ceγ ωIJ ωβ = dα Tr Ψˆγ q( i ).ωγ γ¯L[dω].Ψ = ... = .∂e H. , (25) h K β i Z − h K i d thus reproducing the Einstein’s equations in the form (24) as the equation of expectation values of precanonical quantum operators.

4. Conclusion The ability of precanonical quantization to reproduce correctly the classical field equations as the equations of expectation values of quantum operators, i.e. the validity of the Ehrenfest theorem, can be considered as a consistency test of the (i) precanonical representation of operators, (ii) precanonical analog of the Schrödinger equation and (iii) the prescription of the calculation of expectation values of operators using the Clifford algebra-valued precanonical wave functions. In the case

aA • B := ∗−1(∗A ∧∗B) is the product operation in the Poisson-Gerstenhaber algebra of brackets which underlies the precanonical quantization. August 10, 2018 23:58 WSPC Proceedings - 9.75in x 6.5in mymg14-ehr8 page 7

of scalar fields on curved background the generalization of the Ehrenfest theorem identifies the connection term in the Dirac operator of the precanonical Schrödinger equation as the spin connection. This observation allows us to proceed with the precanonical quantization of general relativity with more confidence. The sketch of the derivation of the Einstein-Palatini equations for vielbein gravity from the quantum theory of gravity obtained by precanonical quantization of vielbein general relativity indicates, in particular, that the value of the cosmological constant is fixed by a suitable ordering of operators and the consistency with the lo- cal covariant probability conservation, which also coincides with the known property of the spin connection and curved Dirac matrices fulfilled on average. A very rough estimation 12c of the value of the dimensionless parameter λ = Λ n3, which (~κκ)2 ∼ originates from the re-ordering of operators ω and ∂ω in precanonical Schrödinger equation, has lead us to an unexpected conclusion that the parameter κ of precanonical quantization, which is consistent with the observed values of Λ, G and ~, is at the nuclear scale. However, this preliminary consideration of the pure grav- itational contribution to Λ neglects the matter fields. We need an independent argument regarding the estimation of the scale of κ, if it is a universal scale, which might be provided e.g. by a precanonical quantization approach to the mass gap problem in quantum Yang-Mills theory (see Ref. 16 for a work in this direction).

Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to the School of Physics and Astronomy of the University of St Andrews for its kind hospitality and the possibility to use its facilities at any time of the day or night, which made the progress reported here possible.

References 1. I. Kanatchikov, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37, 333 (1998). arXiv:quant-ph/9712058. I. Kanatchikov, AIP Conf. Proc. 453, 356 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9811016. I. Kanatchikov, Rep. Math. Phys. 43, 157 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9810165. 2. I. Kanatchikov, arXiv:hep-th/0112263; I. Kanatchikov, in The Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, p. 1395, (World Scientiﬁc, Singapore, 2002). arXiv:gr-qc/0012038. 3. H. Rund, The Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in the Calculus of Variations, (Robert E. Krieger, N.Y., 1973); H. Kastrup, Phys. Rep. 101, 1 (1983). 4. I. Kanatchikov, Rep. Math. Phys. 41, 49 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9709229. I. Kanatchikov, Rep. Math. Phys. 40, 225 (1997). arXiv:hep-th/9710069. I. Kanatchikov, arXiv:hep-th/9312162. 5. B. Hatﬁeld, Quantum Field Theory of Point Particles and Strings, (Addison- Wesley, Redwood City, 1992) 6. I. Kanatchikov, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18, 1249 (2014). arXiv:1112.5801. I. Kanatchikov, arXiv:1312.4518. August 10, 2018 23:58 WSPC Proceedings - 9.75in x 6.5in mymg14-ehr8 page 8

7. I. Kanatchikov, J. Geom. Symmetry Phys. 37, 43 (2015). arXiv:1501.00480. 8. I. Kanatchikov, On the Ehrenfest Theorem in quantum general relativity, work in progress. 9. I. Kanatchikov, Precanonical Quantization: From Foundations to Quantum Gravity, in preparation. 10. I. Kanatchikov, to appear in MG14 Proceedings (2016). arXiv:1512.09137. 11. R. Bertlmann, Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory, (Clarendon, Oxford, 1996) 12. I. Kanatchikov, AIP Conf. Proc. 1514, 73 (2012). arXiv:1212.6963. I. Kanatchikov, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 442, 012041 (2013). arXiv:1302.2610. I. Kanatchikov, NPCS 17, 372 (2014). arXiv:1407.3101. 13. I. Kanatchikov, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 40, 1121 (2001). gr-qc/0012074. See also: I. Kanatchikov, gr-qc/9810076; gr-qc/9912094; gr-qc/0004066. 14. I. Kanatchikov, In: Differential Geometry and its Applications, Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Diff. Geom. & Appl., Olomouc, August 2007, Kowalski O., Krupka D., KrupkováO. and Slovák J. (Eds), World Scientific, Singapore 2008, pp 615-625. arXiv:0807.3127. 15. I. Kanatchikov, Precanonical Quantum Cosmology and Cosmological Spin Con- nection Field, talk at MG14. 16. I. Kanatchikov, Rep. Math. Phys., 53, 181 (2004). arXiv:hep-th/0301001.