DOCSLIB.ORG

United States Electricity Industry Primer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States Electricity Industry Primer July 2015 United States Electricity Industry Primer Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability U.S. Department of Energy DOE/OE-0017 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was prepared by the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability under the direction of Patricia Hoffman, Assistant Secretary, and Devon Streit, Deputy Assistant Secretary. Specific questions about information in this report may be directed to Jamie Clark, Infrastructure Systems Analyst ([email protected]). Contributors include Matthew Gilstrap, Shravan Amin, and Kevin DeCorla-Souza. 1 | P a ge U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Industry Overview ................................................................................................................................. 4 2 Electricity Basics .................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Electricity Supply Chain ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Generation .................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Transmission and the Grid .......................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Distribution ................................................................................................................................. 21 4 Markets and Ownership Structures .................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 FERC ............................................................................................................................................ 24 4.3 NERC ............................................................................................................................................ 25 4.4 ISOs/RTOs .................................................................................................................................... 25 4.5 State Regulatory Agencies .......................................................................................................... 27 4.6 Utilities ........................................................................................................................................ 27 4.7 Wholesale Electricity Markets .................................................................................................... 28 4.8 Retail Electricity Markets ............................................................................................................ 30 4.9 Capacity Markets ........................................................................................................................ 30 5 Power Outages and Restoration ......................................................................................................... 31 5.1 Power Sector Vulnerabilities ....................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Black Start ................................................................................................................................... 33 5.3 General Preparedness ................................................................................................................. 33 5.4 Prestorm Preparation ................................................................................................................. 35 5.5 Restoration Process .................................................................................................................... 36 5.6 Interdependencies ...................................................................................................................... 39 5.7 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 39 Appendix A: Understanding the Grid .......................................................................................................... 40 Appendix B: Circuit Basics Continued ......................................................................................................... 43 Appendix C: Reliability Standards ............................................................................................................... 55 Appendix D: U.S. Department of Energy Authorities and Key Legislation .................................................. 58 Appendix E: Common Industry Terms ........................................................................................................ 85 2 | P a ge U.S. Department of Energy Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability FIGURES Figure 1: Basic Electricity Definitions ............................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2: Conceptual Flow Chart of the Electricity Supply Chain .................................................................. 6 Figure 3: U.S. Power Generation by Fuel Type in 2014 ................................................................................ 6 Figure 4: U.S. Generation Capacity in 2013 .................................................................................................. 6 Figure 5: Geographic Distribution of U.S. Power Plants (More than 1 Megawatt) ...................................... 7 Figure 6: Conceptual Illustration of a Thermal Generation Power Plant ...................................................... 8 Figure 7: Overview of a Nuclear Power Generation Process ........................................................................ 9 Figure 8: Overview of Hydroelectric Power Generation Process ............................................................... 10 Figure 9: Overview of Wind Farm Power Generation ................................................................................. 10 Figure 10: Map of Four North American Power Grid Interconnections ..................................................... 11 Figure 11: Daily System Demand Profile ..................................................................................................... 12 Figure 12: Electricity Supply Chain ............................................................................................................. 13 Figure 13: High Voltage Transmission Towers ............................................................................................ 13 Figure 14: Structural Variations of Transmission Towers ........................................................................... 14 Figure 15: Transmission Voltage Classes .................................................................................................... 15 Figure 16: Large Power Transformer Detailing Major Internal Components ............................................. 17 Figure 17: 2011 Large Power Transformer Procurement Process and Estimated Optimal Lead Time ...... 18 Figure 18: Estimated Characteristics of Large Power Transformers in 2011 .............................................. 18 Figure 19: State-Level Distribution of Electric Customers in 2013.............................................................. 20 Figure 20: Flow of Electric Power Through a Distribution Substation ........................................................ 21 Figure 21: Diagram of Transmission and Distribution Networks ................................................................ 22 Figure 22: Service Drop for an Industrial Facility ........................................................................................ 22 Figure 23: Household Service Line Drop from Distribution Line ................................................................. 22 Figure 24: Pad-Mounted Distribution Transformer .................................................................................... 22 Figure 25: Schematic of Underground Distribution Network ..................................................................... 22 Figure 26: Commercial Microgrid Application at Santa Rita Jail in California ............................................. 23 Figure 27: Map of Regional Reliability Councils Under NERC ..................................................................... 25 Figure 28: Map of North American Transmission Operators ...................................................................... 26 Figure 29: Vertically Integrated Utility Model ............................................................................................ 28 Figure 30: Conceptual Smart Grid Schematic ............................................................................................. 34 Figure 31: Typical Power Restoration Process ............................................................................................ 38 Figure 32: Conceptualization of Free Elctrons Flowing Through Metal ...................................................... 43 Figure 33: Electricity Terms, Derivations, and Conversions ........................................................................ 43 Figure 34: Power Consumption of a 15-Watt Light Bulb ............................................................................ 44
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Synchrophasor Monitoring for Distribution Systems: Technical Foundations and Applications
    NASPI-2018-TR-001 Synchrophasor Monitoring for Distribution Systems: Technical Foundations and Applications A White Paper by the NASPI Distribution Task Team January 2018 Editor: Alexandra von Meier - UC Berkeley Contributing Authors (in alphabetical order): Reza Arghandeh - Florida State University Kyle Brady - UC Berkeley Merwin Brown – UC Berkeley George R. Cotter – Isologic LLC Deepjyoti Deka – Los Alamos National Laboratory Hossein Hooshyar – Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute Mahdi Jamei – Arizona State University Harold Kirkham – Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Alex McEachern – Power Standards Lab Laura Mehrmanesh – UC Berkeley Tom Rizy – Oak Ridge National Laboratory Anna Scaglione – Arizona State University Jerry Schuman – PingThings, Inc. Younes Seyedi – Polytechnique Montreal Alireza Shahvasari – UC Riverside Alison Silverstein - NASPI Emma Stewart – Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Luigi Vanfretti – Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Alexandra von Meier - UC Berkeley Lingwei Zhan – Oak Ridge National Laboratory Junbo Zhao – Virginia Tech 2 Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Premise of Distribution PMUs ........................................................................................ 6 1.2 What’s new? Synchrophasor technology ....................................................................... 7 1.3 Why bother? High-value uses for distribution monitoring ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Electricity Prices During the Transition Away from Coal by William B
    May 2021 | Vol. 10 / No. 10 PRICES AND SPENDING Trends in electricity prices during the transition away from coal By William B. McClain The electric power sector of the United States has undergone several major shifts since the deregulation of wholesale electricity markets began in the 1990s. One interesting shift is the transition away from coal-powered plants toward a greater mix of natural gas and renewable sources. This transition has been spurred by three major factors: rising costs of prepared coal for use in power generation, a significant expansion of economical domestic natural gas production coupled with a corresponding decline in prices, and rapid advances in technology for renewable power generation.1 The transition from coal, which included the early retirement of coal plants, has affected major price-determining factors within the electric power sector such as operation and maintenance costs, 1 U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS capital investment, and fuel costs. Through these effects, the decline of coal as the primary fuel source in American electricity production has affected both wholesale and retail electricity prices. Identifying specific price effects from the transition away from coal is challenging; however the producer price indexes (PPIs) for electric power can be used to compare general trends in price development across generator types and regions, and can be used to learn valuable insights into the early effects of fuel switching in the electric power sector from coal to natural gas and renewable sources. The PPI program measures the average change in prices for industries based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTRIC POWER | April 14-17 2020 | Denver, CO | Electricpowerexpo.Com
    Presented by: EXPERIENCE POWER ELECTRIC POWER | April 14-17 2020 | Denver, CO | electricpowerexpo.com 36006 MAKE CHANGE HAPPEN ON THE alteRED POWER LANDSCAPE! The global power sector is undergoing dramatic changes, driven by many economic, technological and efficiency factors. Rapid reductions in the cost of solar and wind technologies have led to their widespread adoption. To accommodate soaring shares of these variable forms of generation, innovations have also emerged to increase supply-side, demand-side, grid, and storage flexibility. ELECTRIC POWER is the ONLY event providing real-world, actionable content year-round in print, online, and in person that can be applied immediately at your facility, and it’s your best opportunity to discover, learn and make change happen within your organization. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT | ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES | SYSTEM DESIGN It’s the conference I make it a point to attend every year. All of the programs really provide an opportunity for the “ attendees to go back to their plant the very next week and look at something a different way or try“ out a new process or procedure. It’s been a great opportunity to make contacts and meet new vendors and suppliers of goods and services and has opened up the opportunity for everyone to exchange information and facts. Melanie Green, Sr. Director — Power Generation, CPS Energy CO-locATED EVENTS ENERGY PROVIDERS COALITION FOR EDUCATION ELECTRIC POWER | April 14-17 2020 | Denver, CO | electricpowerexpo.com WHY EXHIBIT & SPONSOR? • BRANDING • BUILD RELATIONSHIPS/NETWORKING • THOUGHT LEADERSHIP • DRIVE SALES 2200 700 38 100+ 85% Attendees Conference Delegates Countries End-User Companies of attendees are from the top 20 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Interconnection Regional Reliability Organizations Sign New Agreement
    Eastern Interconnection Regional Reliability Organizations Sign New Agreement Executive Committee Meeting September 7, 2006 Agenda Item #EC-8b. August 15, 2006 The six regional councils of the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) that form the Eastern Interconnection have signed an agreement to form the Eastern Interconnection Reliability Assessment Group (ERAG). The Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC), Midwest Reliability Organization (MRO), Northeast Power Coordinating Council, Inc. (NPCC), ReliabilityFirst Corporation (RFC), SERC Reliability Corporation (SERC), and Southwest Power Pool (SPP) created ERAG to enhance reliability of the international bulk power system through reviews of generation and transmission expansion programs and forecasted system conditions within the boundaries of the Eastern Interconnection. “A reliability assessment agreement that spans the entire Eastern Interconnection, including portions of Canada, is unprecedented, “ commented Bill Reinke, Chairman of the Regional Managers Committee that designed the agreement. “The agreement demonstrates our continued commitment to reliability, and provides opportunities to study the system from a much broader perspective.” All six regions in the Eastern Interconnection are working with NERC to achieve delegated authority as regional entities for the purpose of proposing reliability standards and enforcing reliability standards consistent with FERC Order 672. These delegated authority agreements will be submitted to FERC for approval. Once granted, the regional entities are expected to create common approaches to compliance and enforcement administration. The new ERAG agreement is one example of how the regions will use common methods to promote compliance with the reliability standards and in turn enhance reliability. ” This agreement reflects the commitment of the regions to work together and with NERC to ensure the reliability of the nation’s bulk power system,” stated Rick Sergel, President and CEO of NERC.
    [Show full text]
  • Vuspec Power Dist 2016
    Notice of New Standard Products Title: IEEE Power, Distribution & Regulating Transformers Collection: VuSpec™ Summary (Abstract): IEEE Power, Distribution and Regulatory Transformer Collection: VuSpec™ contains the latest standards, guides, and recommended practices of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Transformers Committee. It also contains IEEE C57 series of standards. This collection represents the most complete resource available for professional engineers looking for best practices and techniques covering testing, repair, installation, operation, and maintenance of transformers, reactors, and associated components that are used within the electric utility and industrial power systems. These standards provide provides a crucial service to society's need for continuing development and maintenance of a reliable, safe, and efficient power system infrastructure. Table of Contents: Includes 104 active IEEE standards for Power Distribution & Regulating Transformers family. • IEEE Std 4-2012, IEEE Standard for High-Voltage Testing Techniques • IEEE Std 259™-1999 (R2010), IEEE Standard Test Procedure for Evaluation of Systems of Insulation for Dry-Type Specialty and General - Purpose Transformers • IEEE Std 638™-2013, IEEE Standard for Qualification of Class 1E Transformers for Nuclear Power Generating Stations • IEEE Std 1276™-1997 (R2006), IEEE Guide for the Application of High-Temperature Insulation Materials in Liquid- Immersed Power Transformers • IEEE Std 1277™-2010, IEEE Standard General Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Electric Power Supply Systems
    Overview of Electric Power Supply Systems Why are electric power systems studied? What are the characteristics of power systems that justify spending a whole course on them? There are many answers to each of these questions; this course will touch on a few of them. You will recall that ECE370 gave an overview of the circuit theory associated with electrical power and it is worth recalling that most power systems are three-phase and that when balanced systems are being analyzed these are usually drawn in terms of a one-line diagram, i.e. a single line is used to denote the three phases, which may or may not also have a neutral. The US Electric Power System The main aspects that describe power systems are: size, complexity and economic impact. Utility power systems cover vast territory, are subject to the whims of nature, are interconnected to each other, the quality of their commodity affects the ability of industry to produce effectively, and the price of their commodity has a significant impact on the economy of their service area. Controlling power systems requires that electricity be supplied at the correct frequency, satisfactory voltage, with its phases balanced, have low harmonic content, and with all protection systems coordinated. The foregoing has to be achieved without overloading equipment and at the lowest cost to the consumer (after the utility makes a reasonable profit.) All this is complicated by the fact that demand for electricity changes throughout the day (and week, and season) and that electricity can not be readily stored in a practical manner.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Energy Storage Technologies' Application
    sustainability Review A Review of Energy Storage Technologies’ Application Potentials in Renewable Energy Sources Grid Integration Henok Ayele Behabtu 1,2,* , Maarten Messagie 1, Thierry Coosemans 1, Maitane Berecibar 1, Kinde Anlay Fante 2 , Abraham Alem Kebede 1,2 and Joeri Van Mierlo 1 1 Mobility, Logistics, and Automotive Technology Research Centre, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (T.C.); [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (A.A.K.); [email protected] (J.V.M.) 2 Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-485659951 or +251-926434658 Received: 12 November 2020; Accepted: 11 December 2020; Published: 15 December 2020 Abstract: Renewable energy sources (RESs) such as wind and solar are frequently hit by fluctuations due to, for example, insufficient wind or sunshine. Energy storage technologies (ESTs) mitigate the problem by storing excess energy generated and then making it accessible on demand. While there are various EST studies, the literature remains isolated and dated. The comparison of the characteristics of ESTs and their potential applications is also short. This paper fills this gap. Using selected criteria, it identifies key ESTs and provides an updated review of the literature on ESTs and their application potential to the renewable energy sector. The critical review shows a high potential application for Li-ion batteries and most fit to mitigate the fluctuation of RESs in utility grid integration sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Replacing Property Taxes on Utility Generation with Revenues from a Carbon-Based Tax: a Minnesota Tax Shift Opportunity I
    Memo: To: Michael Noble, ME3 From: John Bailey, David Morris, ILSR (Tel: 612-379-3815) Date: 11/15/98 Re: Replacing Property Taxes on Utility Generation With Revenues from a Carbon-Based Tax: A Minnesota Tax Shift Opportunity I. Introduction Electric utilities in Minnesota pay four types of taxes: income tax, franchise fee (or gross receipts tax), sales tax, property tax.1 The total amount paid in each category is shown in Table 1. In 1995, the total came to $375 million. Table 1. Electric Utility Tax Paid in Minnesota in 1995 Property Tax MN Sales Tax MN Income Tax Franchise Fee Total NSP $152,078,365 $65,076,000 $31,709,000 $25,505,000 $274,368,365 Minnesota Power $34,706,493 $5,963,664 $3,843,817 $700,000 $45,213,974 Otter Tail $7,152,715 $4,197,450 $1,370,067 $233,643 $12,953,875 Interstate $3,670,381 $1,935,124 $573,770 $569,969 $6,749,244 Anoka Elec. Coop $3,179,055 $4,658,862 $0 $534,379 $8,372,296 Dakota Elec. Assoc. $4,742,500 $4,487,719 $0 $144,025 $9,374,244 Cooperative Power $7,095,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,095,000 United Power Assoc. $10,827,954 $0 $5,000 $0 $10,832,954 Total $223,452,463 $86,318,819 $37,501,654 $27,687,016 $374,959,952 Source: Minnesota Department of Public Service, 1996 Energy Policy and Conservation Report, December 1996 Recently, Minnesota has re-examined the utility tax structure in light of the restructuring of electricity occurring throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Power Quality
    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO POWER QUALITY 1.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter reviews the power quality definition, standards, causes and effects of harmonic distortion in a power system. 1.2 DEFINITION OF ELECTRIC POWER QUALITY In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis and concern for the quality of power delivered to factories, commercial establishments, and residences. This is due to the increasing usage of harmonic-creating non linear loads such as adjustable-speed drives, switched mode power supplies, arc furnaces, electronic fluorescent lamp ballasts etc.[1]. Power quality loosely defined, as the study of powering and grounding electronic systems so as to maintain the integrity of the power supplied to the system. IEEE Standard 1159 defines power quality as [2]: The concept of powering and grounding sensitive equipment in a manner that is suitable for the operation of that equipment. In the IEEE 100 Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standard Terms, Power quality is defined as ([1], p. 855): The concept of powering and grounding electronic equipment in a manner that is suitable to the operation of that equipment and compatible with the premise wiring system and other connected equipment. Good power quality, however, is not easy to define because what is good power quality to a refrigerator motor may not be good enough for today‟s personal computers and other sensitive loads. 1.3 DESCRIPTIONS OF SOME POOR POWER QUALITY EVENTS The following are some examples and descriptions of poor power quality “events.” Fig. 1.1 Typical power disturbances [2]. ■ A voltage sag/dip is a brief decrease in the r.m.s line-voltage of 10 to 90 percent of the nominal line-voltage.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Power Reactors in California
    Nuclear Power Reactors in California As of mid-2012, California had one operating nuclear power plant, the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant near San Luis Obispo. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) owns the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, which consists of two units. Unit 1 is a 1,073 megawatt (MW) Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) which began commercial operation in May 1985, while Unit 2 is a 1,087 MW PWR, which began commercial operation in March 1986. Diablo Canyon's operation license expires in 2024 and 2025 respectively. California currently hosts three commercial nuclear power facilities in various stages of decommissioning.1 Under all NRC operating licenses, once a nuclear plant ceases reactor operations, it must be decommissioned. Decommissioning is defined by federal regulation (10 CFR 50.2) as the safe removal of a facility from service along with the reduction of residual radioactivity to a level that permits termination of the NRC operating license. In preparation for a plant’s eventual decommissioning, all nuclear plant owners must maintain trust funds while the plants are in operation to ensure sufficient amounts will be available to decommission their facilities and manage the spent nuclear fuel.2 Spent fuel can either be reprocessed to recover usable uranium and plutonium, or it can be managed as a waste for long-term ultimate disposal. Since fuel re-processing is not commercially available in the United States, spent fuel is typically being held in temporary storage at reactor sites until a permanent long-term waste disposal option becomes available.3 In 1976, the state of California placed a moratorium on the construction and licensing of new nuclear fission reactors until the federal government implements a solution to radioactive waste disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing
    energies Article Advantages of Applying Large-Scale Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing Dawid Chudy * and Adam Le´sniak Institute of Electrical Power Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego Str. 18/22, PL 90-924 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The continuous development of energy storage (ES) technologies and their wider utiliza- tion in modern power systems are becoming more and more visible. ES is used for a variety of applications ranging from price arbitrage, voltage and frequency regulation, reserves provision, black-starting and renewable energy sources (RESs), supporting load-generation balancing. The cost of ES technologies remains high; nevertheless, future decreases are expected. As the most profitable and technically effective solutions are continuously sought, this article presents the results of the analyses which through the created unit commitment and dispatch optimization model examines the use of ES as support for load-generation balancing. The performed simulations based on various scenarios show a possibility to reduce the number of starting-up centrally dispatched generating units (CDGUs) required to satisfy the electricity demand, which results in the facilitation of load-generation balancing for transmission system operators (TSOs). The barriers that should be encountered to improving the proposed use of ES were also identified. The presented solution may be suitable for further development of renewables and, in light of strict climate and energy policies, may lead to lower utilization of large-scale power generating units required to maintain proper operation of power systems. Citation: Chudy, D.; Le´sniak,A. Keywords: load-generation balancing; large-scale energy storage; power system services modeling; Advantages of Applying Large-Scale power system operation; power system optimization Energy Storage for Load-Generation Balancing.
    [Show full text]