Burnham Hall, Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Burnham Hall, Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire BURNHAM HALL, HEDGERLEY LANE, BEACONSFIELD, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RECORDING ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS LTD BURNHAM HALL, HEDGERLEY LANE, BEACONSFIELD, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RECORDING Author: Jonathan Grant MA AIFA Geoffrey Marshall BSc Josh Williams BSC PGDip AIFA NGR: SP 9465 8990 Report No. 1630 District: Beaconsfield Site Code: AS 953 Approved: Claire Halpin MIFA Project No. 2227 Signed: Date: Jan 2006 This report is confidential to the client. Archaeological Solutions Ltd accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. Archaeological Solutions Ltd, 98-100 Fore Street, Hertford SG14 1AB Tel: 01992 558170 Fax: 01992 553359 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.ascontracts.co.uk Registered Number: 4702122 OASIS SUMMARY SHEET Archaeological Solutions Limited 2006 Project details Project name Burnham Hall, Beaconsfield Project description (250 words) Between July 2004 and January 2005, Archaeological Solutions Limited (AS) conducted a programme of archaeological monitoring and recording at Burnham Hall, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire (SP 9465 8990). The site lies to the immediate south of the crossroads at Beaconsfield. The latter was the site of the historic marketplace. The site lies to the rear of 17th century cottages, and in open grassland which was not developed until the late 19th century. The archaeological potential of the site was to reveal traces of medieval and/or post-medieval ‘back- yard’ activity. The monitoring encompassed site-wide ground reduction and also foundation and drainage trenches. No archaeological features or finds were revealed. Shallow demolition layers directly overlay the natural gravel drift, indicating that the site had been previously levelled for hardstanding and the construction of garage blocks. Project dates (fieldwork) July 2004 – late Jan 2005 Previous work (Y/N/?) Y Future work (Y/N/?) N P. number 2227 Site code AS 953 Type of project Archaeological Monitoring & Recording Site status Current land use Garaging Planned development Residential development Main features (+dates) None Significant finds (+dates) None Project location County/ District/ Parish Bucks South Bucks Beaconsfield HER/ SMR for area Bucks SMR Post code (if known) Area of site c.0.30ha NGR SP 9465 8990 Height AOD (max/ min) 113/110m AOD Project creators Brief issued by Bucks County Archaeology Service Project supervisor/s (PO) G Marshall/J Williams Funded by English Courtyard Developments Full title Burnham Hall, Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield; Archaeological Monitoring & Recording Authors J Grant & J Williams Report no. 1630 Date (of report) Jan 2006 Burnham Hall, Beaconsfield: Watching Brief 2 Archaeological Solutions Limited 2006 BURNHAM HALL, HEDGERLEY LANE, BEACONSFIELD, BUCKINGHAM ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING AND RECORDING SUMMARY Between July 2004 and January 2005, Archaeological Solutions Limited (AS) conducted a programme of archaeological monitoring and recording at Burnham Hall, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire (SP 9465 8990). The site lay to the immediate south of the crossroads of Beaconsfield. The latter was the core of the historic marketplace. The site lay to the rear of 17th century and later cottages, and in open grassland that was not developed until the late 19th century. The archaeological potential of the site was to reveal traces of medieval and/or post-medieval ‘back-yard’ activity. The monitoring encompassed site-wide ground reduction and also drainage trenches. No archaeological features or finds were revealed. Shallow demolition layers directly overlay the natural gravel drift, indicating that the site had been previously levelled for hardstanding and the construction of garage blocks, as well as the former Burnham Hall. 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Between late July 2004 and late January 2005, Archaeological Solutions Ltd (AS) conducted a programme of archaeological monitoring and recording at Burnham Hall, Malthouse Square and land rear of 45-59 Windsor End and of 1-13 and 15-29 Hedgerley Lane, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire (NGR SP 9465 8990) (Figs. 1 & 2). The monitoring was commissioned by Sidell Gibson Limited on behalf of English Courtyard Developments Limited. It was linked to proposals to demolish the existing buildings and erect two blocks comprising 15 sheltered housing units with wardens’ accommodation and guest suite together with car ports and stores (Planning Application: 03/01418) (Fig. 3). The monitoring was carried out as part of a planning condition imposed by the local planning authority (based on advice from Buckinghamshire County Archaeological Service (BCAS)). 1.2 The monitoring and recording was conducted in accordance with a brief issued by BCAS (D Radford dated 14/04/04), and a specification prepared by AS (dated 26/04/04). The project followed the procedures outlined in the Institute of Field Archaeologists’ Standard and Guidance for Archaeological Watching Briefs (revised 1999). 1.3 The principal project aim was: • To identify and record any archaeological features revealed by the groundworks, paying particular regard to the potential for medieval occupation (including any boundary features that may mark the rear plot boundaries along Windsor End). Burnham Hall, Beaconsfield: Watching Brief 3 Archaeological Solutions Limited 2006 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE (Figs. 1 & 2) 2.1 The site lies within the historic medieval and post-medieval core of Beaconsfield. The settlement developed as a hamlet of Burnham to the south, in the 12th and 13th centuries (Hepple & Doggett 1994, 77). 2.2 As it exists today, Windsor End is wide road lined with trees which still retains many of the 17th century timber-framed cottages and the contemporary Greyhound Inn. Abutting the western extremity of the site lie Nos.45-7 which was a two-bay 16th century hall house, with 17th century stack. It was divided into two properties in c.1764. The line of old cottages along Windsor End continue into Hedgerley Lane (Pevsner & Williamson 1994, 172). 2.3 The site contained the location of the demolished building of Burnham Hall, fronting Malthouse Square to the east, with scrub, demolition debris and some traces of possible basementing or truncation of the area. The building was clearly demolished some years ago. The central part of the site was largely open, prior to redevelopment, and covered in scrub and some mature trees. The western part of the site was previously occupied by a small garage block and electricity substation, with areas of scrub and hardstanding. Two narrow entrances to the site lead in from Windsor End to the west, and Hedgerley Lane to the south. The site is bounded to the west and south west by terraced housing of 17th/18 century and later date. The houses front Windsor End and Hedgerley Lane to the south west of the site. A residential block of 20th century date fronts Hedgerley Lane. The site is bounded to the north by the rear plots of houses fronting Windsor End and Crosby Close, and the rear plot of a public house fronting Windsor End. Further properties fronting Crosby Close bound the site to the north east, and a Magistrate’s Court lies to the north. 2.4 The site lies within the Beaconsfield Conservation Area which reflects the extent of the historic core of the Old Town. 3 ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 3.1 The archaeological and historical background to the site is presented in detail in an archaeological desk-based assessment prepared by AS (Grant 2004). 3.2 Beaconsfield lies on a drift geology of glacial sand and gravel (Geological Survey of Great Britain, SSEW 1983). The soil of the area is a gravelly loam that overlies a chalky subsoil (VCH III, 155). The site lies at c.110m AOD near to the church, to the north west, and this is the highest point. 3.3 Beaconsfield is centred on a long and wide street that is bisected by a less wide street. The latter is Aylesbury End to the north, and Windsor End to the south. The historic market place lay at the apex of these roads, although it is likely that in its heyday it extended into the surrounding roads. The streets still exhibit 15th, 16th and 17th century timber-framed houses that are obscured behind 18th century frontages (Pevsner & Williamson 1994, 168). The 20th century development of the New Town lies to the north of the historic core. The site lies to the south of this historic core off Windsor End. Burnham Hall, Beaconsfield: Watching Brief 4 Archaeological Solutions Limited 2006 3.4 Although Beaconsfield is not mentioned in the Domesday Book, it is likely that it was included under the listing for Burnham. If so, in 1086 it was in the possession of Walter Fitz Otho (VCH III, 157; Morris 1978). It is first mentioned in the Pope Rolls by name in 1184 as Bekenesfeld. 3.5 The medieval market prospered, particularly during the later medieval period, because of its proximity to London, Oxford, Windsor and Aylesbury. Substantial fees from the markets and the fairs were given to Burnham Abbey and consequently the four Ends1 in the core of the town were rigorously protected from encroachment, which is why the roads in the town centre are still broad today. 3.6 In summary, Beaconsfield dates from the early medieval period and it is unlikely that substantial activity occurred locally prior to this period, though there is a possibility of Roman activity associated with the purported course of two local Roman roads. Development did not occur within the immediate area of the site until the early 20th century. Ground disturbance was thought likely to be moderate, and associated with the foundations and services relating to the former Burnham Hall, and the levelling of the site for hardstanding. Small areas of possible former basementing/terracing were evident prior to the development within the footprint of the hall in the eastern part of the site.
Recommended publications
  • 5350 the London Gazette, 12Th May 1970 Water
    5350 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 12TH MAY 1970 the Colchester and District Water Board (Water A copy of the application and of any map, plan Charges) Order, 1968. or other document submitted with it may be inspected The Board are authorised to supply water in the free of charge at the Board's Southern Area Office, areas or part of the areas of the following-named Mill End Road, High Wycombe, at all reasonable counties and districts: hours during the period beginning 8th May 1970. The administrative County of Cambridgeshire. and ending on 5th June 1970. The administrative County of Essex. This proposal is to enable the Bucks Water Board The administrative County of West Suffolk. to continue to abstract from existing boreholes and The Borough of Colchester. the proposed boreholes at their Mill End Road Pump- The Urban District of Braintree and Booking. ing Station a total daily quantity of 4,000,000 gallons. The Urban District of Halstead. Any person who wishes to make representations The Urban District of West Mersea. about the application should do so in writing to the The Urban District of Witham. Secretary, Thames Conservancy, Burdett House, 15 The Urban District of Wivenhoe. Buckingham Street, London W.C.2, before the end The Rural District of Braintree. of the said period. The Rural District of Chelmsford. R. S. Cox, Clerk and Treasurer of the Bucks The Rural District of Clare. Water Board. The Rural District of Dunmow. 1st May 1970. The Rural District of Halstead. The Rural District of Lexden and Winstree. The Rural District of Maldon.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Buckinghamshire; a Military History by Ian F. W. Beckett
    Buckinghamshire; A Military History by Ian F. W. Beckett 1 Chapter One: Origins to 1603 Although it is generally accepted that a truly national system of defence originated in England with the first militia statutes of 1558, there are continuities with earlier defence arrangements. One Edwardian historian claimed that the origins of the militia lay in the forces gathered by Cassivelaunus to oppose Caesar’s second landing in Britain in 54 BC. 1 This stretches credulity but military obligations or, more correctly, common burdens imposed on able bodied freemen do date from the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms of the seventh and eight centuries. The supposedly resulting fyrd - simply the old English word for army - was not a genuine ‘nation in arms’ in the way suggested by Victorian historians but much more of a selective force of nobles and followers serving on a rotating basis. 2 The celebrated Burghal Hidage dating from the reign of Edward the Elder sometime after 914 AD but generally believed to reflect arrangements put in place by Alfred the Great does suggest significant ability to raise manpower at least among the West Saxons for the garrisoning of 30 fortified burghs on the basis of men levied from the acreage apportioned to each burgh. 3 In theory, it is possible that one in every four of all able-bodied men were liable for such garrison service. 4 Equally, while most surviving documentation dates only from 1 G. J. Hay, An Epitomised History of the Militia: The Military Lifebuoy, 54 BC to AD 1905 (London: United Services Gazette, 1905), 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorney Parish News
    Dorney Parish NewV )HEUXDU\ 1 Providing Care, Comfort and Companionship in Burnham. Join us for “Tea for Two” on Tuesdays! Bring a friend to enjoy tea, freshly baked cakes, our newly decorated dining room and beautiful landscaped surroundings. We look forward to welcoming you, every second Tuesday of the month, at 2:30pm. Find us: Parliament Lane, Burnham, Slough, SL1 8NU Call us to find out more: on 01628 667345 Email: [email protected] 2 ISSUE NO. 1/19 FEBRUARY 2019 EDITORIAL As we enter a New Year, we are in the midst of a political crisis. A right wing group seeks to rise roughshod over relationships that have endured for decades. Many citizens would like to return to how it was in the 1960s. Others feel what they were promised in the 1970s is different to how things have turned out. Meanwhile, remainers are striving to find any legal means to prevent what the government intends. Yes, we have to face it – the plans for a Unitary Council in Buckinghamshire are not going well. As the erstwhile Bucks district councils plan legal action against the Secretary of State’s scheme, one wonders again just why our County Councillor is so, to use his phrase, ‘delighted’, at Mr Brokenshire’s decision. Some call for a ‘Buxit’ with us re-locating in the Royal Borough and I recommend Virginia Silvester’s article in this issue on the evolution of Bucks’ borders to get an idea of how Dorney came to be poised on the edge of two counties. Anybody reading the Parish Council minutes in this issue will see how our representatives believe that decisions over liaison with the M4 Project are being taken far to the north of Dorney.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire County Rugby Football Union Cup & Bowl Competitions
    BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LIMITED Season 2016 / 2017 H A N D B O O K bucksrfu.pitchero.com BUCKINGHAMSHIRE RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LIMITED Registered Number: 28986 R website: bucksrfu.pitchero.com Buckinghamshire Rugby Football Union was founded on Friday, 16th July 1949 at a meeting held at the Red Lion Hotel in High Wycombe. Colours: Red & Black Chairman’s Foreword Welcome to the new County Handbook which I hope you will find to be a useful source of valuable information about our County and our Clubs. I hope that you find the fixture lists a useful feature, enabling you to support our Bucks Clubs. Please also refer to our Website: bucksrfu.pitchero.com This site holds all the relevant information and news about Bucks Rugby. Please contact the Webmaster if you have any information or news that needs to be shared. Remember, the website is only as good as its content so let’s all contribute! The season 2015/16 was again a huge success for Rugby in the County with the Bucks U 20 XV reaching the semi-final of the county plate competition and the senior XV also getting to the semi- final of their competition. This is the furthest either team have reached in the County’s history. As a County we seem to produce some very talented players, and this is very much down to the Clubs and Schools in our area being “Development” focused and ensuring that the most talented get the exposure they deserve. We intend as County to continue this theme every season and ensure that as many players as possible have the opportunity to play at their highest potential level.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, ?Th August 1987
    10082 THE LONDON GAZETTE, ?TH AUGUST 1987 as part of the Conservation Area is Church Circle, the area of which Colnbrook: The rest of the area of open space at Crown Meadow, is bounded by the rear of the curtilages of those properties on the formerly part of the hostel site and now open Green Belt land and outside of the Circle. the area to the north and east of the church, including the old (818) Vicarage which is rural in character and by virtue of its Green Belt designation intended to remain so. See Map J. II. Land to be removed from the Area of Special Control of SOUTH BUCKS DISTRICT COUNCIL Advertisements TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1971 Beaconsfield: Areas at Holtspur, Copperfields, Ledborough Wood, Lakes Lane/Malthouse Square and between Burkes Town toid Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations Road/Grove Road and the Oxford Road. These areas share similar 1984 characteristics to the other built-up residential parts of the town and should be treated similarly for the purpose of advertisement Notice is hereby given that the South Bucks District Council in control. See Map A. exercise of its powers under Regulation 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1984, has Burnham: Areas in the vicinity of the Bishop Centre, the built-up submitted for the approval of the Secretary of State for the area south of the Bath Road, Lent Green/Gore Road, Wymers Environment an Order modifying the Bucks County Council Wood Road/Poyle Lane, Hogfair Lane/Green Lane/The Fairway Control of Advertisements (Area of Special Control) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Used As Reference Site Address Held As
    South Bucks District Council Property Portfolio - January 2020 Used As Reference Site Address Held As Easting Northing Let As Oakside, Denham, Buckinghamshire, Amenity Land 2015/00440/PROPSB UB9 4BX Freehold 504941 185142 Lease from SBDC Stoke Place Boarding Kennels, Stoke Place Farmhouse, Stoke Place, Stoke Green, Stoke Poges, Boarding Kennels 2016/00497/PROPSB Buckinghamshire, SL2 4HT Freehold 498266 182272 Lease from SBDC Boat Yard, Mill Lane, Taplow, Boat Yard 2015/00472/PROPSB Buckinghamshire, SL6 0AA Freehold 490195 181385 Lease from SBDC Altons, Burkes Road, Beaconsfield, Car Park - Surface 2015/00416/PROPSB Buckinghamshire, HP9 1PB Freehold 493802 190990 Penncroft Car Park, Burkes Road, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, HP9 Car Park - Surface 2015/00418/PROPSB 1NZ Freehold 493865 190944 Lease from SBDC Car Park, Warwick Road, Car Park - Surface 2015/00427/PROPSB Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire Freehold 493813 191346 Lease from SBDC Car Park Opposite Neville Court, Dropmore Road, Burnham, Car Park - Surface 2015/00432/PROPSB Buckinghamshire Freehold 493129 182937 Lease from SBDC Car Park, Jennery Lane, Burnham, Car Park - Surface 2015/00434/PROPSB Buckinghamshire, SL1 8BX Freehold 493201 182606 Lease from SBDC Summers Road Car Park, Summers Car Park - Surface 2015/00438/PROPSB Road, Burnham, Buckinghamshire Freehold 493058 182535 Lease from SBDC Broadway Car Park and Public Conveniences, The Broadway, Beaconsfield Road, Farnham Car Park - Surface 2015/00450/PROPSB Common, Buckinghamshire Freehold 496048 185025 Lease from SBDC Bulstrode
    [Show full text]
  • 14A Woodchester Park, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, HP9 2TU Location
    Insert Image of property here 14a Woodchester Park, Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, HP9 2TU Location This beautiful home is one of 2 homes and 4 apartments on our latest development in Woodchester Park, Beaconsfield. The locale is considered a highly desirable commuter town, being within a 30-minute journey to Heathrow and 25 minutes from London Marylebone via Chiltern Railways. The area has an OFSTED rated “Outstanding” school just 0.3 miles away, and is within catchment for several Buckinghamshire grammar schools. In addition, there are a wide range of private schools in the vicinity such as High March & Davenies. There are multiple boutiques, supermarkets, and restaurants in the Beaconsfield area. Larger shopping centres can be found in High Wycombe (Eden centre) and in Uxbridge (The Chimes/Intu). In addition, the town is well served with multiple Golf and Sports Clubs in the area, for those who enjoy an active lifestyle. The home is also very close to the Beaconsfield Model Village, a lovely tourist attraction. Beaconsfield- 1.9 miles Gerrards Cross - 5.7 miles High Wycombe - 6.1 miles Heathrow Airport - 15.0 miles Luton Airport - 28.1 miles Windsor - 11.7 miles Ascot - 17.5 miles Wycombe Heights Golf Centre - 4.1 miles Gerrards Cross Golf Club - 6.2 miles Buckinghamshire Golf Club - 9.7 miles Alfriston School - 0.3 miles Davenies School - 1.4 miles Beaconsfield High School- 1.9 miles Burnham Grammar School - 7.7 miles Beaconsfield Train Station- 1.2 miles Seer Green Train Station- 3.2 miles High Wycombe Train Station - 6.1 miles Floor Plan - Proposed Ground Floor Ground Floor: 151m2/ 1629ft2 Total area of property: 367m2 / 3951ft2 Floor Plan - Proposed First Floor First Floor: 153m2/ 1647ft2 Total area of property: 367m2 / 3951ft2 Floor Plan - Proposed Loft Floor Loft Floor: 63m2 / 675ft2 Total area of property: 367m2 / 3951ft2 The Pillars, Slade Oak Lane, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire SL9 0QE +44 (0) 1895 832 560 [email protected] www.landmark-group.co.uk Landmark Group provides a 10 year warranty on new homes through Advantage Insurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-16 Buckinghamshire County Council Travel Policy
    Local Authority Post 16 Transport Policy Statement 2017/2018 Transport policy statement for learners aged 16–18 and continuing learners aged 19 and over Name of Local Authority: Buckinghamshire County Council Department Responsible: Children’s Social Care and Learning 1. Summary of Policy Statement and Main Objectives Buckinghamshire County Council is committed to ensuring that students aged 16–19 have access to educational opportunities at school or college, enabling them to acquire the knowledge, skills and experience necessary for them to pursue their chosen careers and, more importantly, to meet the challenge of employment and personal development in the future. This Policy Statement describes the assistance with transport costs that is available to students aged 16-19, resident in Buckinghamshire, who are undertaking full-time further education courses. This statement is published in line with the Department for Education national guidance: www.gov.uk/government/publications/post-16-transport-to-education-and-training 2. Financial Support Schemes 2.1. The 16-19 Bursary Fund A key priority of the Government is to close the gap in attainment between those from poorer and more affluent backgrounds, and to ensure every young person participates in and benefits from a place in 16-19 education and training. The Government provides funding to tackle disadvantage both through the Education Funding Agency’s (EFA) funding formula and through the £180 million 16-19 Bursary Fund to help young people meet the costs of participating in education and training post-16. The scheme is made up of two elements: Bursaries of £1,200 a year are available for the most vulnerable groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedgerley Parish Council Comments on SBDC Ward Boundaries Consultation
    Hedgerley Parish Council Comments on SBDC Ward Boundaries Consultation Hedgerley Parish Council (HPC) is opposed to any change to the District Ward boundaries which would result in there being more than one District Councillor representing the Civil Parish of Hedgerley. This is because the single point of focus for District representation that exists now, and that works so well in the practical administration of Hedgerley, would be lost. We know that having one District Councillor to one or many parish Councils is effective. (The present District Councillor attends HPC and also Fulmer Parish Council meetings.) HPC appreciates that having many District Councillors to one Parish Council could be appropriate for large parishes. However HPC does not see how having many District Councillors to many Parish Councils could work at a practical level. Which of the District Councillors would attend HPC meetings? Would all of them attend? Perhaps there would be a rota, but how would there be continuity in addressing the issues pertinent to Hedgerley? In terms of alignment with other communities: According to the SBDC ward profile: the Hedgerley & Fulmer ward has a population of 1525, is made up of 12 hectares of buildings (0.9% of ward area) and 1112 hectares of green‐space (91% of ward area). In contrast the Farnham Royal ward has a population of 5218, is 24 hectares of buildings (6% of ward area) and just 197 hectares of green‐ space (49% of ward area). In summary, Hedgerley could be considered to be rural whereas Farnham Royal is largely residential. This difference in ward profile is further highlighted in the population density figures of 12.44 persons per hectare versus 1.12 persons per hectare for Hedgerley.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Medieval Buckinghamshire
    SOLENT THAMES HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH FRAMEWORK RESOURCE ASSESSMENT MEDIEVAL BUCKINGHAMSHIRE (AD 1066 - 1540) Kim Taylor-Moore with contributions by Chris Dyer July 2007 1. Inheritance Domesday Book shows that by 1086 the social and economic frameworks that underlay much of medieval England were already largely in place. The great Anglo Saxon estates had fragmented into the more compact units of the manorial system and smaller parishes had probably formed out of the large parochia of the minster churches. The Norman Conquest had resulted in the almost complete replacement of the Anglo Saxon aristocracy with one of Norman origin but the social structure remained that of an aristocratic elite supported by the labours of the peasantry. Open-field farming, and probably the nucleated villages usually associated with it, had become the norm over large parts of the country, including much of the northern part of Buckinghamshire, the most heavily populated part of the county. The Chilterns and the south of the county remained for the most part areas of dispersed settlement. The county of Buckinghamshire seems to have been an entirely artificial creation with its borders reflecting no known earlier tribal or political boundaries. It had come into existence by the beginning of the eleventh century when it was defined as the area providing support to the burh at Buckingham, one of a chain of such burhs built to defend Wessex from Viking attack (Blair 1994, 102-5). Buckingham lay in the far north of the newly created county and the disadvantages associated with this position quickly became apparent as its strategic importance declined.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaconsfield
    Beaconsfield Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Assessment Report Caput House, Old Beaconsfield The Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Project was carried out between 2008 and 2012 by Buckinghamshire County Council with the support of English Heritage © Buckinghamshire County Council and English Heritage 2008 Report produced by Ruth Beckley and David Green All the mapping contained in this report is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100021529 (2008) All Historic Photographs are reproduced courtesy of the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies unless otherwise stated. Copies of this report and further information can be obtained from: Buckinghamshire County Council Planning Advisory and Compliance Service, Place Service, Buckinghamshire County Council County Hall Aylesbury Bucks HP20 1UY Tel: 01296 382656 Email: [email protected] Beaconsfield Historic Town Assessment Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 5 I DESCRIPTION................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Project Background and Purpose ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amersham & Beaconsfield Property Briefing
    AMERSHAM & BEACONSFIELD PROPERTY BRIEFING HOME TRUTHS ABOUT THE LOCAL MARKETS SPRING/SUMMER 2021 Property profile Factors shaping YOUR LOCAL the local market MARKETS The level of interest in the Amersham and Beaconsfield property markets remains high "As lifestyle changes continue to drive the market, buyers are flocking to Amersham and Beaconsfield for the rural lifestyle they provide. In the first four months of 2021, our buyer registrations were up 140% in Amersham and 75% in Beaconsfield compared to the same period in 2020. These numbers are staggering, as the first quarter of last year was itself a period of high demand because of the ‘Boris bounce’, which saw an uplift in the property MEETING EXPECTATIONS market following the General Election. On average, over the past People know with more certainty that they no longer have to 12 months our Amersham and commute every day, so they’re prepared to move further out of Beaconsfield offices have London. Amersham and Beaconsfield have always been popular achieved 98% of the guide with families, but we’ve noticed that the families are getting price for sold properties. younger. People are saying, “if we’re going to move in the future, why don’t we think about moving now?” Looking at the 12 months to March 2021 compared to the ON THE UP previous 12 months, we’ve seen an increase of 17% of buyers from From January to May, local postcodes, 20% from within the Home Counties, and an 80% new buyer registrations increase from London. increased by 140% in However, this level of demand means that we have too many Amersham and by 75% in buyers seeking too few properties.
    [Show full text]