DOCSLIB.ORG

General Manual Clerks of Courts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Manual Clerks of Courts GENERAL MANUAL FOR CLERKS OF COURTS Prepared by TENNESSEE CLERKS OF COURT in coordination with THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE=S COUNTY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICE and CENTER FOR GOVERNMENT TRAINING and THE TENNESSEE SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS Revised May 2001 PREFACE This manual has been published to assist all Court Clerks in the service to the citizens of Tennessee. The manual is designed to provide a broad based review of the operation of a state Court Clerk’s Office. While the manual is a comprehensive publication, Clerks are urged to use alternative resources to supplement the data in the manual. This is the third update of the manual. The first publication was in 1996 and again in 1998. Many of the changes reflect legislative action amending the Tennessee Code Annotated. The changes in this version are minor in nature but are important. It is the goal of the Committee to keep the manual current. The manual will be updated every time a change is needed. The change will be posted on the AOC Website. The address is www.tsc.state.tn.us. The complete manual will be online at this site. At the Clerks’ Fall conferences, an update supplement will be available. Clerks will only have to change the pages in the manual that need replacing. This will insure that the manual is updated every year. We welcome your suggestions and comments for the improvement of this publication in the future. As Chairman of the Committee, I extend my thanks to all Committee members as listed in the following pages. Special thanks to Rebecca Montgomery, Senior Staff Attorney for the AOC and to the AOC Staff for all their hard work. Garry W. Jones Chairman Tennessee State Court Clerks Manual Committee May 2001 CLERKS’ MANUAL COMMITTEE 2001 Garry W. Jones P.O. Box 733 Gainesboro, TN 38562 931-268-9516 Heather Duncan P.O. Box 629 Manchester, TN 37349 931-723-5110 Ron Swafford 1600 E. 3rd Street Chattanooga, TN 37404 423-493-9263 Chris Thomas 140 Adams Street, Room 114 Memphis, TN 38103 901-545-4040 Claudia Bonnyman Metro Courthouse, Room 2 Nashville, TN 37201 615-862-5710 David Torrence 309 Metro Courthouse Nashville, TN 37201 615-862-5600 Martha Phillips Room 149, City County Building Knoxville, TN 37902 865-215-5492 iii CLERKS’ MANUAL COMMITTEE 1998 Mahailiah Hughes Circuit Court Clerk Sumner County P.O. Box 549 Gallatin, TN 37066 615/452-4367 Lee Akers Lewis Coomer Hamilton County Circuit Court Clerk Clerk and Master Putnam County 201 Seventh Avenue, Room 300 421 E. Spring Street, #1C49A Chattanooga, TN 37402 Cookeville, TN 38501 931/528-1508 Kay Armstrong Clerk and Master Jimmie German Greene County Circuit Court Clerk Box 263 Fayette County Greeneville, TN 37743 P.O.Box 177 423/638-6361 Somerville, TN 38068 901/465-5205 Claudia Bonnyman Clerk and Master Shirley Graham Davidson County Clerk and Master 2 Metro Courthouse Hawkins County #1 Public Square 101 E. Main Street, Courthouse Nashville, TN 37201 Rogersville, TN 37857 615/862-5710 423/272-1850 John Bratcher Tommy Higdon Clerk and Master Clerk and Master Rutherford County Marshall County Judicial Bldg., Room 302 208 Marshall County Courthouse 20 Public Square North Lewisburg, TN 37091 Murfreesboro, TN 37130 615/898-7860 John Hoff Clerk and Master Cheryl Castle Dyer County Circuit Court Clerk Dyersburg, TN 38024 Montgomery County 731/286-7818 P.O. Box 384 Clarksville, TN 37040 931/648-5700 iv Sarah Housewright Richard Rooker Clerk and Master Circuit Court Clerk Sullivan County Davidson County 225 W. Center Street 506 Metro Courthouse Kingsport, TN 37660 #1 Public Square 423/224-1726 Nashville, TN 37203 615/862-5181 Brenda Hyden Juvenile Court Clerk Martha Smith Williamson County Clerk and Master 408 Century Cuort Hardin County Franklin, TN 37064 Main Street, Courthouse 615/790-5814 Savannah, TN 38372 731/925-8166 Judy Medearis Circuit Court Clerk Don Squibb Hamilton County Circuit Court Clerk 201 7th Avenue, Room 500 Washington County Chattanooga, TN 37402 P.O. Box 356 423/209-6700 Jonesborough, TN 37659 423/753-1611 Holly Jaynes Circuit Court Clerk Chris Thomas Hawkins County Probate Court Clerk P.O. Box 9 Shelby County Rogersville, TN 37857 140 Adams Street, Room 114 423/272-3397 Memphis, TN 38103 Marion Nuckolls David Torrence Clerk and Master Criminal Court Clerk Hardeman County Davidson County P.O. Box 45 309 Metro Courthouse Bolivar, TN 38008 #1 Public Square 731/658-3142 Nashville, TN 37201 615/862-5600 Martha Phillips Criminal Court Clerk Raymond Winters Knox County Circuit Court Clerk Room 150, C/C Bldg. Sullivan County Knoxville, TN 37902 P.O. Box 585 865/215-2492 Blountville, TN 37617 423/323-5158 v Original Edition 1996 Tennessee Court Clerk’s Manual Committee Claudia Bonnyman Deputy Circuit Court Clerk Clerk and Master Sumner County Davidson County P.O. Box 549 2 Metro Courthouse Gallatin, TN 37066 #1 Public Square 615/452-4310 Nashville, TN 37201 615/862-5710 Bill Heron Juvenile Court Clerk John Bratcher 1600 E. Third Street Clerk and Master Chattanooga, TN 37402 Rutherford County 423/493-9250 Judicial Bldg., Room 302 20 Public Square North Mahailiah Hughes Murfreesboro, TN 37130 Circuit Court Clerk 615/898-7860 Sumner County Clerk P.O. Box 549 Lewis Coomer Gallatin, TN 37066 Circuit Court Clerk 615/452-4367 Putnam County 421 E. Spring Street, #1C49A Brenda Hyden Cookeville, TN 38501 Juvenile Court Clerk 931/528-1508 408 Century Court Franklin, TN 37064 Ron Durby 615/790-5812 Clerk and Master 201 Seventh St., Room 300 Jean Jones Hamilton County Courthouse Clerk and Master Chattanooga, TN 37402 Hamblen County Courthouse 423/757-2311 511 W. 2nd North Street Morristown, TN 37814 Jimmie German 423/586-9112 Circuit Court Clerk Fayette County Suzanne G. Keith P.O.Box 177 Deputy Director, AOC Somerville, TN 38068 Nashville City Center, Suite 600 901/465-5207 Nashville, TN 37243-0607 615/741-2687 Don Layton Linda Hall Clerk and Master vi Anderson County Criminal Court Clerk P.O. Box 501 Knox County Clinton, TN 37716 Room 150, C/C Bldg. 865/457-5400 Ext. 208 Knoxville, TN 37902 865/215-2492 Frankie Lewis Chief Deputy Clerk Mary Tom Plummer Supreme Court Building Director of Education, AOC 719 Locust Street Nashville City Center, Suite 600 Knoxville, TN 37901 Nashville, TN 37243-0607 865/594-6700 615/741-2687 Luther McKeehan Barbara Walls Courthouse Annex Clerk and Master 900 E. Elk Avenue Fayette County Elizabethton, TN 37643 Drawer 220 423/542-1835 Somerville, TN 38068 901/465-5219 Kenny Norman Juvenile Court Clerk John Weaver 100 Woodland Street Clerk and Master Nashville, TN 37213 Knox County 615/862-7983 Room 123, City-County Bldg. Knoxville, TN 37902-1805 Marion Nuckolls 865/521-2555 Clerk and Master Hardeman County Raymond Winters P.O. Box 45 Circuit Court Clerk Bolivar, TN 38008 Sullivan County 731/658-3142 P.O. Box Blountville, TN 37617 423/323-5158 Martha Phillips vii DEDICATION This manual is dedicated to the memory of Amy Hull Ransdell, 1963-1994, as set forth in the following memorial prepared by her colleagues from the County Technical Assistance Service Institute for Public Service from the University of Tennessee. viii MEMORIAL TO AMY HULL RANSDELL 1963 - 1994 Amy Hull Ransdell was born in Greeneville, Tennessee, to U.S. District Judge Thomas and the late Joan Hull on June 21, 1963. She graduated from high school in Greeneville, Tennessee, and attended the University of Tennessee, graduating with a B.S. in communications in June of 1985. In the fall of 1988, after having spent three years as a congressional aid in Washington, Amy entered the Cecil C. Humphreys Law School of Memphis State University and graduated in May of 1991. Upon completion of law school, she moved to London, Kentucky, clerking for Judge Eugene Siler of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. She was based in London but worked frequently in Cincinnati, Ohio, when the court was sitting there. Prior to her marriage to Keith Ransdell on May 7, 1993, Amy joined the legal staff of the County Technical Assistance Service, an agency of the University of Tennessee. As a part of her position, Amy assisted county officials across the state, providing guidance in legal matters, with primary emphasis directed to State Court Clerks. She co-authored a number of manuals designed to assist these county officials with the operation of their offices. After her death, the County Officials Association of Tennessee honored Amy with the Outstanding Public Service Professional Award. On December 9, 1994, Amy, who was five months pregnant with a little girl, Emma Katherine, was killed by a drunk driver who drove his pickup onto the sidewalk pinning Amy against a steel light pole. The accident occurred around noon as Amy was standing on the sidewalk in front of Church Street Centre Mall in downtown Nashville during her lunch hour waiting to cross the street. Amy had been Christmas shopping for gifts for her family, typical for Amy, whose family meant so much to her. Amy will be remembered by those who knew her as a sweet, considerate, and happy person who was so looking forward to being a mother and having a family of her own. In today’s world where people seem to be becoming more cynical and less caring, Amy stood out as a rare individual who greeted everyone with a smile and had a gentle, caring, positive spirit. She looked for and saw the good in everyone around her. A gentle light has gone out of this world, but her sweet spirit will never be forgotten; nor should we ever forget why she is gone and why Emma Katherine will never have the chance to experience life.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of TENNESSEE at KNOXVILLE September 2, 2020 Session1
    12/17/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 2, 2020 Session1 JARED EFFLER ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Campbell County No. 16596 John D. McAfee, Judge ___________________________________ No. E2018-01994-SC-R11-CV ___________________________________ Declaring that the sale and distribution of illegal drugs affects every community in the country, the Tennessee Legislature enacted the Tennessee Drug Dealer Liability Act, Tennessee Code Annotated sections 29-38-101 to -116. This Act provides a cause of action against a knowing participant in the illegal drug market for injuries caused by illegal drug use. In response to the opioid epidemic in East Tennessee, seven District Attorneys General and two Baby Doe plaintiffs sued several drug companies under the Act. The District Attorneys and the Baby Doe plaintiffs alleged that the drug companies knowingly participated in the illegal drug market by intentionally flooding East Tennessee communities with prescription opioid medications, leading to widespread addiction and diversion of the opioids into the black market. The District Attorneys claimed that the opioid epidemic had damaged the communities in their districts, and the Baby Doe plaintiffs alleged that they were harmed by exposure to opioids in utero. The drug companies moved to dismiss the lawsuit on the pleadings. Their two-fold challenge asserted that the Act did not authorize the District Attorneys to sue for damages and that the Act did not apply to the drug companies’ conduct. The trial court ruled that the Act did not apply and dismissed the case.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 19-7369 in the Supreme Court of the United States
    NO. 19-7369 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DAVID KEEN, Petitioner, v. TENNESSEE, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE TENNESSEE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS RESPONDENT’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION HERBERT H. SLATERY III Attorney General and Reporter State of Tennessee ANDRÉE SOPHIA BLUMSTEIN Solicitor General COURTNEY N. ORR Assistant Attorney General Counsel of Record 301 6th Avenue North P.O. Box 20207 Nashville, Tennessee 37202-0207 (615) 741-2455 Counsel for Respondent CAPITAL CASE RESTATEMENT OF THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED I Does this Court have jurisdiction to decide whether its opinion in Moore v. Texas requires Tennessee to grant successive collateral review of a criminal judgment when the order of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals enforced a state statutory restriction on successive collateral review? II Did the decision of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals thwart the constitutional prohibition against the execution of intellectually disabled offenders by declining to force an Atkins claim into the petitioner’s chosen, but inapt, procedural vehicle? i TABLE OF CONTENTS RESTATEMENT OF THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ............................................................... i RULE 15.2 STATEMENT OF PROCEDURAL HISTORY ..........................................................1 OPINIONS BELOW ........................................................................................................................3 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Supreme Court Order Extending Limits on In-Person
    03/25/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE IN RE: COVID-19 PANDEMIC ______________________ No. ADM2020-00428 ______________________ ORDER CONTINUING SUSPENSION OF IN-PERSON COURT PROCEEDINGS AND EXTENSION OF DEADLINES On March 13, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chief Justice of the Tennessee Supreme Court declared a state of emergency for the Judicial Branch of Tennessee government and activated a Continuity of Operations Plan for the courts of Tennessee. See Tenn. Const. Art. VI, § 1; Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 16-3-501 to 16-3-504 (2009); Moore-Pennoyer v. State, 515 S.W.3d 271, 276-77 (Tenn. 2017); Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 49. This state of emergency constitutes a “disaster” for purposes of Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 49 and Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-116. In light of ongoing concerns, the Tennessee Supreme Court hereby continues the suspension of in-person court proceedings and the extension of deadlines as set forth in this order. We again emphasize that the local and state courts of the State of Tennessee are open and will remain open under all circumstances, subject to the provisions of this order. Under the constitutional, statutory, and inherent authority of the Tennessee Supreme Court, we adopt the following provisions. All in-person proceedings in all state and local courts in Tennessee, including but not limited to municipal, juvenile, general sessions, trial, and appellate courts, shall be suspended from the close of business on Friday, March 13, 2020, through Thursday, April 30, 2020, subject to the exceptions below.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 16-1161 In The Supreme Court of the United States BEVERLY R. GILL, ET AL., Appellants, v. WILLIAM WHITFORD, ET AL., Appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE TENNESSEE STATE SENATORS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS John L. Ryder Counsel of Record Pablo Adrian Varela Harris Shelton Hanover Walsh, PLLC 40 South Main Street, Suite 2700 Memphis, Tennessee 38103 901.545.1455 [email protected] Linda Carver Whitlow Knight Gullett Sanford Robinson & Martin, PLLC 150 Third Avenue South, Suite 1700 Nashville, TN 37201 615.244.4994 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae Dated: August 3, 2017 LANTAGNE LEGAL PRINTING 801 East Main Street Suite 100 Richmond, Virginia 23219 (800) 847-0477 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES………………………….. iv INTERESTS OF THE AMICI CURIAE…………….. 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT………………………… 3 ARGUMENT…………………………………………….. 5 I. Colonial America through the Founding….. 5 II. Gerrymander and the Constitution………... 9 A. The Constitutional Convention………. 9 B. The State Ratifying Conventions…… 12 III. The Early Republic to 1842……………..… 16 A. Early State Approaches to Gerrymandering………………………. 16 1. Gerrymandering in the States…………………………..…. 16 2. States that Took Steps to Avoid Gerrymandering……………...…. 19 3. Later Effects of State Gerrymandering……………….... 20 iii IV. Congressional and State Reapportionment 1842-1962…………………………………….. 22 A. Congressional Oversight of Gerrymandering………………………. 22 B. Legislation in the States……………... 24 C. Later Congressional Action………….. 25 V. The Modern Era………………………....….. 30 VI. Fruitless Search for Manageable Standards…………………………………….. 33 VII. Proportionality………………………............ 39 CONCLUSION………………………………………… 41 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Page(s) Anderson v. Jordan, 343 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Supreme Court
    Tennessee Supreme Court As required by the state Constitution, the five members of the Tennessee Supreme Court normally hear cases in Nashville, Jackson and Knoxville. Pictured in the courtroom at the Supreme Court building in Nashville are (from left to right) Justice Janice M. Holder, Justice William C. Koch, Jr., Chief Justice Cornelia A. Clark (seated), Justice Gary R. Wade, and Justice Sharon G. Lee. The Supreme Court sits “en banc,” or as a whole, rather than in smaller panels. The TENNESSEE SUPREME COURT The court also has appellate jurisdiction in is the state’s highest court and the court of cases involving state taxes, the right to hold last resort. The five justices review civil and public office and issues of constitutional law. criminal cases appealed from lower state If requested, attorneys may present oral courts. They interpret the laws and arguments before the Supreme Court. Unlike constitutions of Tennessee and the United trials in lower courts, there are no witnesses, States. juries or testimony. The justices are appointed by the After the justices have heard oral arguments governor and then elected every eight years and reviewed the attorneys’ written materials, or on a ―yes-no‖ retention vote. They represent briefs, they issue written decisions, known as each of the state’s grand divisions – West, opinions. Middle and East Tennessee. Tennessee Supreme Court opinions on federal By constitutional mandate, the court constitutional issues can be appealed only to the normally meets in Nashville, Jackson and United States Supreme Court, which may or may Memphis. not agree to consider the appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • Black History & Milestones in the Tennessee Courts
    Black History & Milestones in Judge Benjamin Hooks becomes the first African American judge in state history when he is appointed Justice George Brown becomes the Tennessee Courts to the Shelby County Criminal the first African American justice Court by Governor Frank Clement. on the Tennessee Supreme He wins election to the seat in 1966 Court after his appointment by and steps down from the bench in Governor Lamar Alexander. In Cook v. State, the Tennessee Supreme Court 1968. Later in his career, he would He loses an election to the seat declares that the recently passed Dortch Act, which serve for five years as commissioner later that year. Justice Brown is In Ford v. Ford, Justice Nathan Green asserts that “a required a secret ballot in cities with large African of the Federal Communications subsequently elected to the 30th slave is not in the condition of a horse or an ox…[He]e American populations and made it illegal to help Commission and as executive Judicial Circuit Court bench in is made after the image of the Creator…He has mental illiterate voters fill out their ballots, is constitutional. director of the NAACP. 1983, and serves as a judge there capacities and an immortal principle in his nature According to scholars, this Act, along with the poll tax, until his retirement from the that constitute him equal to his owner but for the resulted in large reductions of African American voter bench in 2005. accidental position to which fortune has placed him.” participation. The case concerned a slave owner, Loyd Ford, who in The Tennessee Supreme In James Earl Ray v.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Appeals Process
    State Appellate Courts Appellate courts do not conduct trials. Rather, the courts review records from lower courts, with attorneys for both the State and defendant presenting legal positions regarding the issues raised in the appeal. There are twelve judges on the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals. Each month, panels of three judges hold court in the Supreme Court Buildings in each of the three grand divisions of Tennessee: Jackson; Nashville; and Knoxville. Nashville, TN 37202 Nashville, P.O. Box 20207P.O. Box Section Justice Criminal Victim Services Information Office General of the Attorney As the highest state court, the Tennessee Supreme Court’s five justices consider appeals from state courts, interpreting the laws and Constitution of Tennessee. Unlike the Court of Criminal Appeals, review of appeals to the Supreme Court is granted or denied at the discretion of the Court. The only exception to this discretionary review is in capital cases, where a defendant’s conviction and death sentence are automatically reviewed by the Supreme Court on direct appeal. The Supreme Court sits in Jackson in April and November; in Nashville in February, June, and October; and in Knoxville in January, May, and September of each year. Like the Court of Criminal Appeals, the Supreme Court conducts court in Jackson, Nashville and Knoxville at the following locations: • No. 6 Hwy. 45 By-Pass, Jackson, TN • 401 Seventh Avenue North, Nashville, TN • 505 Main Street, Suite 200, Knoxville, TN Postage Postage Here Affix Both the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals and the Tennessee Supreme Court may meet at other locations as necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Supreme Court BAKER V. CARR, 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
    U.S. Supreme Court BAKER v. CARR, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) 369 U.S. 186 BAKER ET AL. v. CARR ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 6. Argued April 19-20, 1961. Set for reargument May 1, 1961. Reargued October 9, 1961. Decided March 26, 1962. Appellants are persons allegedly qualified to vote for members of the General Assembly of Tennessee representing the counties in which they reside. They brought suit in a Federal District Court in Tennessee under 42 U.S.C. 1983, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, to redress the alleged deprivation of their federal constitutional rights by legislation classifying voters with respect to representation in the General Assembly. They alleged that, by means of a 1901 statute of Tennessee arbitrarily and capriciously apportioning the seats in the General Assembly among the State's 95 counties, and a failure to reapportion them subsequently notwithstanding substantial growth and redistribution of the State's population, they suffer a "debasement of their votes" and were thereby denied the equal protection of the laws guaranteed them by the Fourteenth Amendment. They sought, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that the 1901 statute is unconstitutional and an injunction restraining certain state officers from conducting any further elections under it. The District Court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter and that no claim was stated upon which relief could be granted. Held: 1. The District Court had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the federal constitutional claim asserted in the complaint.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2003-2004
    Annual Report of the Tennessee Judiciary Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Table of Contents Message from the Chief Justice & State Court Administrator ------------------ 2 Pro Se Initiatives ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3 Year in Review --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Administrative Office of the Courts ----------------------------------------------------- 9 Judicial Department Budget ------------------------------------------------------------ 10 Court System Chart ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11 Tennessee Supreme Court -------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Intermediate Appellate Courts ---------------------------------------------------------- 13 Message from the Tennessee Judicial Conference President --------------- 15 Trial Court Judges by Judicial District ----------------------------------------------- 16 General Sessions Judges by County ------------------------------------------------ 20 Appellate and Trial Court Clerks ------------------------------------------------------- 23 Court of the Judiciary --------------------------------------------------------------------- 28 Board of Professional Responsibility ------------------------------------------------ 28 Tennessee Board of Law Examiners ------------------------------------------------- 28 Commission on Continuing Legal Education & Specialization ------------- 28 Tennessee Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection ----------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Hunley 1 Professor Saxe Rhodes Institute for Regional Studies 7/5/15
    Ian Hunley 1 Professor Saxe Rhodes Institute For Regional Studies 7/5/15 Into the Political Thicket: Baker v. Carr & the Origins of Judicial Reapportionment Upon his retirement in 1969, Earl Warren stood as one of the great judicial figures in the history of the United States Supreme Court. The liberal Warren Court, which he headed from 1953 until 1969, was responsible for a titanic shift that had brought the protection and expansion of civil liberties to the forefront of the judiciary’s responsibility. As one would expect of such as significant justice, Warren presided over some of the most important cases of the 20th century such as Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), Brown v. Board (1954), and Roe v. Wade (1973). Howev- er, when asked what the most significant case was of his time on the Supreme Court it was not Brown or Roe, but the relatively unknown Baker v. Carr (1962) the Earl Warren dubbed the most important case of his time with the court. Warren noted, “The reason I am of the opinion that Baker v. Carr is so important is because I believe so devoutly that, to paraphrase Abraham Lin- coln’s famous epigram, ours is a government of all the people, by all the people, and for all the people.”1 His assessment is in many respects accurate. Baker v. Carr stands as one of the most significant judicial developments in the nation’s history. It brought about a national revolution just as certainly as Brown did, though with considerably less attention. As such, today all of us live in Baker v.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPREME COURT JUSTICES As Required by the State Constitution, the Five Members of the Tennessee Supreme Court Normally Hear Cases in Nashville, Jackson, and Knoxville
    284 TENNESSEE BLUE BOOK SUPREME COURT JUSTICES As required by the state Constitution, the five members of the Tennessee Supreme Court normally hear cases in Nashville, Jackson, and Knoxville. Pictured in the courtroom at the Supreme Court Building in Nashville are (seated) Chief Justice William M. Barker and (standing left to right) Justices Janice M. Holder, E. Riley Anderson, Adolpho A. Birch Jr., and Cornelia A. Clark. Supreme Court 401 Seventh Avenue North Nashville, TN 37219-1407 (615) 741-1529 www.tsc.state.tn.us The Tennessee Supreme Court is the state’s highest court and the court of last resort. The court normally meets in Jackson, Knoxville, and Nashville, as required by the state Constitution. The five justices may accept appeals of civil and criminal cases from lower state courts. They also interpret the laws and Constitutions of Tennessee and the United States. The Supreme Court may assume jurisdiction over undecided cases in the Court of Appeals or Court of Criminal Appeals when there is special need for a speedy decision. The court also has appellate jurisdiction in cases involving state taxes, the right to hold public office, and issues of constitutional law. Attorneys may present oral arguments before the Supreme Court. Unlike trials in lower courts, there are no witnesses, juries, or testimonies in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, or Court of Criminal Appeals. After Supreme Court justices have heard oral arguments and reviewed the attorneys’ written materials, or briefs, they issue written decisions, known as opinions. Tennessee Supreme Court opinions on constitutional issues can be appealed only to the federal courts, which may or may not agree to consider the appeals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee Supreme Court Order
    02/12/2021 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE IN RE: COVID-19 PANDEMIC ___________________ No. ADM2020-00428 ______________________ ORDER MODIFYING AND PARTIALLY LIFTING SUSPENSION OF IN- PERSON COURT PROCEEDINGS On December 22, 2020, the Court extended the State of Emergency and the suspension of jury trials and reinstated the suspension of in-person court proceedings. On January 15, 2021, the Court further extended the suspension of jury trials and of in-person court proceedings. In light of the recent and continuing decline in the number of COVID- 19 cases and hospitalizations in Tennessee, see Executive Order 75, and under the constitutional, statutory, and inherent authority of the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Court adopts the following provisions: 1) The suspension of in-person court proceedings in termination of parental rights cases is lifted effective Monday, March 1, 2021. 2) The suspension of all other in-person court proceedings in all state and local courts in Tennessee, including but not limited to municipal, juvenile, general sessions, trial, and appellate courts, is lifted effective Monday, March 15, 2021. 3) The suspension of all jury trials remains in effect through the close of business on Wednesday, March 31, 2021, subject only to exceptions which may be granted by the Chief Justice on a case-by-case basis. 4) All in-person court proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the approved comprehensive written plan for the judicial district within which the court is located, which plans shall continue in full force and effect, https://www.tncourts.gov/node/6042449, and in accordance with the following: a) Any permitted in-person court proceedings shall be limited to attorneys, parties, witnesses, security officers, court clerks, and other necessary persons, as determined by the judge and should be scheduled and conducted in a manner to minimize wait time in courthouse hallways.
    [Show full text]