Final Rule: Trade Acknowledgment and Verification of Security-Based

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Rule: Trade Acknowledgment and Verification of Security-Based SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 17 CFR Part 240 [Release No. 34-78011; File No. S7-03-11] RIN 3235-AK91 Trade Acknowledgment and Verification of Security-Based Swap Transactions AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 764(a) of Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is adopting Rules 15Fi-1 and 15Fi-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) requiring security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants to provide trade acknowledgments and to verify those trade acknowledgments in security-based swap transactions. The Commission also is amending Rule 3a71-6 under the Exchange Act to address the potential availability of substituted compliance in connection with those trade acknowledgment and verification requirements. DATES: Effective date: August 16, 2016. Compliance date: The applicable compliance date is discussed in Section V of this final rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula Jenson, Deputy Chief Counsel; Joanne Rutkowski, Assistant Chief Counsel; or Darren Vieira, Special Counsel, at (202) 551-5550, Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-7010. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Introduction ..............................................................................................................4 A. Trade Acknowledgment and Verification ....................................................4 B. Cross-Border Application and Availability of Substituted Compliance....10 II. Discussion of Trade Acknowledgment and Verification Rule ..............................11 A. Definitions..................................................................................................11 1. Proposed Rule ................................................................................11 2. Comments ......................................................................................13 3. Response to Comments and Final Rule .........................................14 B. Trade Acknowledgment Requirement .......................................................15 1. Proposed Rule ................................................................................15 2. Comments ......................................................................................18 3. Response to Comments and Final Rule .........................................20 C. Time to Provide a Trade Acknowledgment ...............................................22 1. Proposed Rule ................................................................................22 2. Comments ......................................................................................24 3. Response to Comments and Final Rule .........................................27 D. Form and Content of Trade Acknowledgments .........................................33 1. Proposed Rule ................................................................................33 2. Comments ......................................................................................35 3. Response to Comments and Final Rule .........................................38 E. Trade Verification ......................................................................................42 1. Proposed Rule ................................................................................42 2. Comments ......................................................................................44 3. Response to Comments and Final Rule .........................................45 F. Exception for Clearing Transactions .........................................................49 G. Exception for Transactions Executed on a Security-Based Swap Execution Facility or National Securities Exchange or Accepted for Clearing by a Clearing Agency ............................................54 1. Exception for Transactions Executed on a Security-Based Swap Execution Facility or National Securities Exchange .......................................................................57 2. Exception for Transactions Accepted for Clearing by a Clearing Agency.....................................................................60 3. Trade Acknowledgment and Verification After Notice That an SBSEF or Exchange Has Not Acknowledged and Verified a Transaction or That a Transaction Has Not Been Accepted for Clearing by a Clearing Agency.....................................................................63 H. Exemption from Rule 10b-10 ....................................................................64 III. Cross-Border Application of Trade Acknowledgment and Verification Requirements .........................................................................................................69 A. Proposed Application .................................................................................69 2 B. Commenter Views .....................................................................................71 C. Response to Comments and Final Interpretation .......................................73 IV. Availability of Substituted Compliance for Trade Acknowledgment and Verification Requirements ..............................................................................76 A. Existing Substituted Compliance Rule ......................................................76 B. Response to Comments and Final Rule .....................................................76 1. Basis for Substituted Compliance in Connection with the Trade Acknowledgment and Verification Requirements .................................................................................77 2. Comparability Criteria, and Consideration of Related Requirements .................................................................................78 V. Effective and Compliance Dates ............................................................................79 A. Trade Acknowledgment and Verification ..................................................80 B. Substituted Compliance Rule .....................................................................82 VI. Paperwork Reduction Act ......................................................................................83 A. Introduction ................................................................................................83 B. Rule 15Fi-2 ................................................................................................84 1. Summary of Collection of Information..........................................84 2. Proposed Use of Information .........................................................86 3. Respondents ...................................................................................87 4. Total Initial and Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burdens ..........................................................................................87 5. Retention Period of Recordkeeping Requirements ........................91 6. Collection of Information is Mandatory ........................................91 7. Confidentiality ...............................................................................91 C. Rule 3a71-6 ................................................................................................92 1. Summary of Collection of Information..........................................92 2. Proposed Use of Information .........................................................94 3. Respondents ...................................................................................94 4. Total Initial and Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burdens ..........................................................................................95 5. Collection of Information is Mandatory ........................................97 6. Confidentiality ...............................................................................97 VII. Economic Analysis ................................................................................................97 A. Introduction ................................................................................................97 B. Economic Baseline...................................................................................102 1. Available Data on Security-Based Swaps....................................103 2. Current Security-Based Swap Market .........................................105 3. Current Estimates of Number of SBS Dealers and Major SBS Participants...........................................................................107 4. Trade Execution ...........................................................................109 5. Clearing Activity ..........................................................................111 6. Current Trade Confirmation Practices .........................................112 a. Joint Regulatory Initiative ................................................113 b. CFTC Trade Confirmation Rules.....................................115 c. Foreign Trade Confirmation Rules ..................................116 3 C. Benefits, Costs, and Effects on Efficiency, Competition, and Capital Formation..............................................................................117 1. Effects on Efficiency, Competition, and Capital Formation .....................................................................................118 a. Broad Market Effects .......................................................118
Recommended publications
  • Griffs Cut TV Slate to 13 Games Gollen Farm of Virginia Was
    HILLSDALE UPSET Amusements, Pages C-7-9 Features, Page C-12 Music, Page C-10 , Books, Page C-13 Terrdng Wins - Radio, Page C-11 Sundau Ste Sports Garden, Pages C-14-15 C Stretch Duel SIXTEEN PAGES WASHINGTON, D. C„ MARCH 1, 1959 ARCADIA. Call!.. Feb. 38 ¦ played him to win to the tune (AP).—Terrang, a 6-year-old of $193,813. It wagered $4,076.- veteran of racing, captured the 038 on the card. 1145.000 Santa Anita Handicap The Indiana-bred gamester, in a thrilling stretch duel with a 4-year-old, carried 118 3-Length Flamingo today. Victor; the favored Hillsdale pounds, three less than Ter- Troilus As a crowd of 57.000 roared I rang, the third choice in the with excitement. Jockey Bill betting. Boland drove Terrang to vic- It was a photo finish, but it tory and the $97,900 winner’s i was apparent at the finish line net share of the purse for his , that Terrang had beaten the owners, Laurence Pollock and Hoosier favorite. - The margin Roland Bond of was half a length and Royal Texas. Living, Royal Living, from the Llan- . ridden by Manuel Griffs Cut TV Slate to 13 Games gollen Farm of Virginia was . Ycaza, was almost three third. lengths behind in the third spot. nr u hm The time for the mile-and- . mmmm WKMi' , • n winter time one-Quarter clas- | BallyruUah Takes Lead Club Income First Landing sic was 3:00 flat, shy of the * track record of 1.59*, set byr Terrang, always a threat > r*M L Round Table in winning the when pointed for a big stakes, Plunges With ¦ Third Behind raA last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercontinental Exchange / 2014 Annual Report
    Intercontinental Exchange / 2014 Annual Report “Our team at Intercontinental Exchange delivered double-digit earnings growth and successfully executed an ambitious range of operational and strategic objectives.” Dear Fellow Shareholders: on or ahead of schedule, with over half Administration to administer a growing of our $550 million expense synergy range of price benchmarks. Our team I’m pleased to report to you on the record target realized in the first full year developed a robust mechanism to results we achieved in 2014; extending after completing the NYSE transaction. administer LIBOR, as well as the ISDAfix our track record of record revenue and We seamlessly integrated our futures rates and, in 2015, the LBMA Gold Price. adjusted earnings in each of our nine years exchanges across multiple asset classes The acquisition of SuperDerivatives as a public company. In a year marked by and accelerated the realization of expands our risk management and ongoing regulatory uncertainty and muted expense synergies. At the same time we pricing capabilities across a wide range of volatility in certain of our asset classes, our were able to complete four acquisitions financial products including interest rate team at Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) that expanded our operations in Asia swaps, while strengthening our range delivered double-digit earnings growth and and Europe and deepened our core of data products and desktop delivery successfully executed an ambitious range risk management, data and listings capabilities. of operational and strategic objectives. capabilities. Importantly, we continued to anticipate our ICE has always been a globally diverse customers’ evolving needs and diversify our During the year, our team worked quickly company, and in 2014 we continued to business to drive innovation and long-term to streamline and enhance our acquired expand our footprint to invest in regions growth.
    [Show full text]
  • 1930S Greats Horses/Jockeys
    1930s Greats Horses/Jockeys Year Horse Gender Age Year Jockeys Rating Year Jockeys Rating 1933 Cavalcade Colt 2 1933 Arcaro, E. 1 1939 Adams, J. 2 1933 Bazaar Filly 2 1933 Bellizzi, D. 1 1939 Arcaro, E. 2 1933 Mata Hari Filly 2 1933 Coucci, S. 1 1939 Dupuy, H. 1 1933 Brokers Tip Colt 3 1933 Fisher, H. 0 1939 Fallon, L. 0 1933 Head Play Colt 3 1933 Gilbert, J. 2 1939 James, B. 3 1933 War Glory Colt 3 1933 Horvath, K. 0 1939 Longden, J. 3 1933 Barn Swallow Filly 3 1933 Humphries, L. 1 1939 Meade, D. 3 1933 Gallant Sir Colt 4 1933 Jones, R. 2 1939 Neves, R. 1 1933 Equipoise Horse 5 1933 Longden, J. 1 1939 Peters, M. 1 1933 Tambour Mare 5 1933 Meade, D. 1 1939 Richards, H. 1 1934 Balladier Colt 2 1933 Mills, H. 1 1939 Robertson, A. 1 1934 Chance Sun Colt 2 1933 Pollard, J. 1 1939 Ryan, P. 1 1934 Nellie Flag Filly 2 1933 Porter, E. 2 1939 Seabo, G. 1 1934 Cavalcade Colt 3 1933 Robertson, A. 1 1939 Smith, F. A. 2 1934 Discovery Colt 3 1933 Saunders, W. 1 1939 Smith, G. 1 1934 Bazaar Filly 3 1933 Simmons, H. 1 1939 Stout, J. 1 1934 Mata Hari Filly 3 1933 Smith, J. 1 1939 Taylor, W. L. 1 1934 Advising Anna Filly 4 1933 Westrope, J. 4 1939 Wall, N. 1 1934 Faireno Horse 5 1933 Woolf, G. 1 1939 Westrope, J. 1 1934 Equipoise Horse 6 1933 Workman, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Derby Winners Vs. Kentucky Derby Winners
    KENTUCKY DERBY WINNERS VS. KENTUCKY DERBY WINNERS Winners of the Kentucky Derby have faced each other 43 times. The races have occurred 17 times in New York, nine in California, nine in Maryland, six in Kentucky, one in Illinois and one in Canada. Derby winners have run 1-2 on 12 occasions. The older Derby winner has prevailed 24 times. Three Kentucky Derby winners have been pitted against one another twice, including a 1-2-3 finish in the 1918 Bowie Handicap at Pimlico by George Smith, Omar Khayyam and Exterminator. Exterminator raced against Derby winners 15 times and finished ahead of his rose-bearing rivals nine times. His chief competitor was Paul Jones, who he beat in seven of 10 races while carrying more weight in each affair. Date Track Race Distance Derby Winner (Age, Weight) Finish Derby Winner (Age, Weight) Finish Nov. 2, 1991 Churchill Downs Breeders’ Cup Classic 1 ¼ M Unbridled (4, 126) 3rd Strike the Gold (3, 122) 5th June 26, 1988 Hollywood Park Hollywood Gold Cup H. 1 ¼ M Alysheba (4,126) 2nd Ferdinand (5, 125) 3rd April 17, 1988 Santa Anita San Bernardino H. 1 1/8 M Alysheba (4, 127) 1st Ferdinand (5, 127) 2nd March 6, 1988 Santa Anita Santa Anita H. 1 ¼ M Alysheba (4, 126) 1st Ferdinand (5, 127) 2nd Nov. 21, 1987 Hollywood Park Breeders’ Cup Classic 1 ¼ M Ferdinand (4, 126) 1st Alysheba (3, 122) 2nd Oct. 6, 1979 Belmont Park Jockey Club Gold Cup 1 ½ M Affirmed (4, 126) 1st Spectacular Bid (3, 121) 2nd Oct. 14, 1978 Belmont Park Jockey Club Gold Cup 1 ½ M Seattle Slew (4, 126) 2nd Affirmed (3, 121) 5th Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Media Guide NYRA.Com 1 FIRST RUNNING the First Running of the Belmont Stakes in 1867 at Jerome Park Took Place on a Thursday
    2018 Media Guide NYRA.com 1 FIRST RUNNING The first running of the Belmont Stakes in 1867 at Jerome Park took place on a Thursday. The race was 1 5/8 miles long and the conditions included “$200 each; half forfeit, and $1,500-added. The second to receive $300, and an English racing saddle, made by Merry, of St. James TABLE OF Street, London, to be presented by Mr. Duncan.” OLDEST TRIPLE CROWN EVENT CONTENTS The Belmont Stakes, first run in 1867, is the oldest of the Triple Crown events. It predates the Preakness Stakes (first run in 1873) by six years and the Kentucky Derby (first run in 1875) by eight. Aristides, the winner of the first Kentucky Derby, ran second in the 1875 Belmont behind winner Calvin. RECORDS AND TRADITIONS . 4 Preakness-Belmont Double . 9 FOURTH OLDEST IN NORTH AMERICA Oldest Triple Crown Race and Other Historical Events. 4 Belmont Stakes Tripped Up 19 Who Tried for Triple Crown . 9 The Belmont Stakes, first run in 1867, is one of the oldest stakes races in North America. The Phoenix Stakes at Keeneland was Lowest/Highest Purses . .4 How Kentucky Derby/Preakness Winners Ran in the Belmont. .10 first run in 1831, the Queens Plate in Canada had its inaugural in 1860, and the Travers started at Saratoga in 1864. However, the Belmont, Smallest Winning Margins . 5 RUNNERS . .11 which will be run for the 150th time in 2018, is third to the Phoenix (166th running in 2018) and Queen’s Plate (159th running in 2018) in Largest Winning Margins .
    [Show full text]
  • Chestnut Filly Barn 3 Hip No
    Consigned by Parrish Farms, Agent Barn Hip No. 3 Chestnut Filly 613 Storm Bird Storm Cat ......................... Terlingua Bluegrass Cat ................... A.P. Indy She's a Winner ................. Chestnut Filly Get Lucky February 4, 2008 Fappiano Unbridled.......................... Gana Facil Unbridled Lady ................. (1996) Assert (IRE) Assert Lady....................... Impressive Lady By BLUEGRASS CAT (2003). Black-type winner of $1,761,280, Haskell In- vitational S. [G1] (MTH, $600,000), Remsen S. [G2] (AQU, $120,000), Nashua S. [G3] (BEL, $67,980), Sam F. Davis S. [L] (TAM, $60,000), 2nd Kentucky Derby [G1] (CD, $400,000), Belmont S. [G1] (BEL, $200,000), Travers S. [G1] (SAR, $200,000), Tampa Bay Derby [G3] (TAM, $50,000). Brother to black-type winner Sonoma Cat, half-brother to black-type win- ner Lord of the Game. His first foals are 2-year-olds of 2010. 1st dam UNBRIDLED LADY, by Unbridled. 4 wins at 3 and 4, $196,400, Geisha H.-R (PIM, $60,000), 2nd Carousel S. [L] (LRL, $10,000), Geisha H.-R (PIM, $20,000), Moonlight Jig S.-R (PIM, $8,000), 3rd Maryland Racing Media H. [L] (LRL, $7,484), Squan Song S.-R (LRL, $5,500). Dam of 6 other registered foals, 5 of racing age, 5 to race, 2 winners-- Forestelle (f. by Forestry). 3 wins at 3 and 4, 2009, $63,654. Sun Pennies (f. by Speightstown). Winner in 2 starts at 3, 2010, $21,380. Mared (c. by Speightstown). Placed at 2 and 3, 2009 in Qatar; placed at 3, 2009 in England. 2nd dam ASSERT LADY, by Assert (IRE).
    [Show full text]
  • Assiniboia Downs Insider Quiz 2019
    Assiniboia Downs Insider Quiz 2019 Circle either a, b, c or d. 1. Which three Downs stake races celebrated milestone runnings in 2019? a) Kentucky Derby, Preakness Stakes, Belmont Stakes b) Winnipeg Futurity, Gold Cup, Sifton Memorial c) Winnipeg Futurity, Speers Memorial, Sifton Memorial d) Winnipeg Futurity, Manitoba Derby, Sifton Memorial 2. Who was the first female jockey to win a race at the Downs? a) Jennifer Anniston b) Joan Phipps c) Barbara Jo Rubin d) Debby Long 3. Who was the first Downs jockey to ride in the Kentucky Derby? a) Darren Dunn b) Todd Kabel c) Bobby Stewart d) Irwin Driedger 4. What was 1976 silver medalist Branch County's name when he raced at the Downs in 1971/72? a) Man O War b) Traffic Bridge c) Traffic Sub d) Milo's Pride 5. Ardell Sayler got his first win at the Downs with which horse? a) Ruffian b) Hay Bomb c) Lucy's Coach d) Saree's Gem 6. Racing term used when one horse bites another in a race? a) Dining-out b) Bearing-in c) Savage d) Animal-cannibal 7. What was Lou Davies pseudonym when he made his daily selections for the local newspaper? a) George "the hammer" Williams b) Liverpool Lou c) Yorkshire Lad d) Brighton's Best 8. Coiner, winner of the 1952 Speers Handicap was the son of? a) Escape Clause b) Swaps c) 1941 Triple Crown winner Whirlaway d) 1948 Triple Crown winner Citation 9. Name the only horse to appear in the R. J. Speers Memorial Stakes six consecutive times? a) Blossom b) Monsoon Rain c) Northern Debut d) Scarlet Rich 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Swaps Trading 2.0: CFTC Proposes Long-Awaited SEF Rule Overhaul
    ALERT MEMORANDUM Swaps Trading 2.0: CFTC Proposes Long-Awaited SEF Rule Overhaul December 20, 2018 If you have any questions concerning this memorandum, please reach out to On November 5, 2018, the Commodity Futures Trading your regular firm contact or the Commission (“CFTC”) voted, on a 4-1 basis (with following authors Commissioner Daniel Berkovitz dissenting), to propose rule amendments (the “SEF Proposal”) to overhaul its regulation N EW YORK of swap execution facilities (“SEFs”) and its implementation Colin D. Lloyd +1 212 225 2809 of the Dodd-Frank Act’s requirement (the “mandatory [email protected] trading requirement”) that certain swaps be executed on a 1 Brian J. Morris SEF or designated contract market (“DCM”). The CFTC +1 212 225 2795 also separately voted unanimously to request comment on the [email protected] practice of post-trade name give-up for anonymous executions Michelle Chun on SEFs (the “Name Give-Up Comment Request”).2 +1 212 225 2536 [email protected] The SEF Proposal is the most significant achievement Reshama J. Patel to-date in a journey commenced by Chairman J. Christopher +1 212 225 2012 [email protected] Giancarlo almost four years ago when, as a minority party Commissioner at the time, he released a white paper setting forth his vision for an alternative swaps trading framework.3 Consistent with that white paper and a second white paper released by Chairman Giancarlo earlier this year,4 the SEF Proposal contains reforms in the following key areas: (1) Flexible Execution Methods. The SEF Proposal would eliminate the requirement that a transaction in a swap covered by the mandatory trading requirement (a “Required Transaction”) be executed on a SEF through either (a) an Order Book or (b) a Request- 1 See 83 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • At Churchill· N Track Today
    iBold Ruler Due At Churchill· n Track Today By Pat l.ynch The Wheatley Stable's Bold Ruler was due at Churchill Downs this afternoon for the May 4 engagement in the 83rd Kentucky Derby .. The racey son of NasruIlah D hooked onto the Cincinnati Limited yesterday afternoon and L was due at LoUisville, Ky., this - morning. The colt will be vanned to the track in care of Bart Sweeney, FITZ WON THREE The 82-year'-0Id Mr. Fitz will leave for Kentucky this week- end by train to supervise the training of the colt. He hopes it will bring him his fourth Kentucky Derby victory. Mr. Fitz' previous s U.cc e s s at Churchill Downs accomplished by Gallant Fox, Johnstown and Omaha. ' The old man might have had a fourth winner if not for hard luck, In 1936 he sent out Gran- vllle against Bold Venture. ville against 'Bold· Venture. Jockey Jimmy stout picked the' precise moment of 1)he'start to i admire the glistening haunches' :of Granville. This was accom- IpUshed by :falling from his I mount at the 'break.and gazing' Iwistfully down the track as the field thundered into history. I Granville. went on to become t the three-year-old champion of IhlS year. , I, MASTER TACTICIAN , Although'it is to'be deplored, ~uhat Bold Ruler will not have .a fe·el of the Ohurchill Downs' strip in competition prior to' the Derby, Mr. Fitz is master- . ful prepai'ingl a colt, Do~n through the years~ he has not had any peeTSreadying a horse .
    [Show full text]
  • Classy Dancer Dark Bay Or Brown Filly; Feb 28, 2015 Mr
    equineline.com Pedigree 02/08/18 12:28:28 EST Classy Dancer Dark Bay or Brown Filly; Feb 28, 2015 Mr. Prospector, 70 b Gone West, 84 b Secrettame, 78 ch Speightstown, 98 ch Storm Cat, 83 dk b/ Classy Dancer Silken Cat, 93 ch Silken Doll, 80 b Foaled in Kentucky Dixieland Band, 80 b Dixie Union, 97 dk b/ Tizsotrue, 06 dk b/ She's Tops, 89 dk b/ Cee's Tizzy, 87 gr/ro Tizso, 95 b Cee's Song, 86 dk b/ By SPEIGHTSTOWN (1998). Champion sprinter in U.S., Stakes winner of $1,258,256, Breeders' Cup Sprint [G1] (LS, $551,200), etc. Among the leading sires twice, sire of 11 crops of racing age, 1016 foals, 759 starters, 89 stakes winners, 1 champion, 594 winners of 2116 races and earning $84,915,829 USA, including Essence Hit Man (Champion twice, $1,414,689 USA, Bold Venture S. [G3] (WO, $108,000(CAN)) twice, etc.), Farmah (Hwt. in Italy, $158,256 USA, Premio Carlo E Francesco Aloisi [G3], etc.), Reynaldothewizard (to 11, 2017, $2,190,790 USA, Gulf News Dubai Golden Shaheen [G1], etc.), Tamarkuz ($1,840,444 USA, Las Vegas Breeders' Cup Dirt Mile [G1] (SA, $550,000), etc.), Do Slice ($1,582,235 USA, NST Sho, etc.), Golden Ticket ($1,362,924, Travers S. [G1] (SAR, $400,000), etc.). 1st dam TIZSOTRUE, by Dixie Union. Unraced. Dam of 6 foals, 4 to race, 3 winners-- =Tizso Wicked (AUS) (f. by =Duporth (AUS)). 6 wins, 3 to 6, 2017 in AUS, $101,806 (USA).
    [Show full text]
  • Swap Trading After Dodd-Frank: Evidence from Index CDS
    Journal of Financial Economics 137 (2020) 857–886 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Financial Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jfec R Swap trading after Dodd-Frank: Evidence from index CDS ∗ Lynn Riggs a, Esen Onur b, David Reiffen b, Haoxiang Zhu c, a Motu Economic and Public Policy Research, New Zealand b U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, United States c MIT Sloan School of Management and NBER 100 Main Street E62-623, 02142, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: The Dodd-Frank Act mandates that certain standard over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives Received 26 January 2018 must be traded on swap execution facilities (SEFs). Using message-level data, we provide Revised 20 August 2019 a granular analysis of dealers’ and customers’ trading behavior on the two largest dealer- Accepted 26 August 2019 to-customer SEFs for index credit default swaps (CDS). On average, a typical customer con- Available online 19 March 2020 tacts few dealers when seeking liquidity. A theoretical model shows that the benefit of JEL classification: competition through wider order exposure is mitigated by a winner’s curse problem and G14 dealer-customer relationships. Consistent with the model, we find that order size, mar- G18 ket conditions, and customer-dealer relationships are important empirical determinants of customers’ choice of trading mechanism and dealers’ liquidity provision. Keywords: Dodd-Frank Act ©2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. OTC derivatives Swaps Swap execution facility Request for quotes Auction Competition Winner’s curse Relationship R The research presented in this paper is co-authored by Lynn Riggs, a and for their valuable comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulch Affair
    Hip No. Barn 8A-D 180 Consigned by Bluewater Sales LLC, Agent II Gulch Affair Raise a Native Mr. Prospector . { Gold Digger Gulch . Rambunctious { Jameela . { Asbury Mary Gulch Affair . Bold Bidder Gray/roan mare; Spectacular Bid . { Spectacular foaled 2005 {Queens Wild . Northern Dancer (1986) { Wild Applause . { Glowing Tribute By GULCH (1984), [G1] $3,095,521, champion. Sire of 21 crops, 72 black type winners, 672 winners, $89,073,673, including Thunder Gulch [G1] ($2,915,086, champion), Nayef [G1] ($3,594,157, hwt), Court Vision [G1] ($3,746,658). Sire of dams of black type winners Strong Blood, Yukino Sun Royal, Media Puzzle, Lawman, Refuse To Bend (IRE), Reenact, etc. 1st dam QUEENS WILD, by Spectacular Bid. 3 wins at 3 and 4, $51,560. Half-sister to EASTERN ECHO [G1] ($93,960, sire), YELL [G2] ($598,903, dam of Shrill, to 4, 2012, $140,275; Cheery, at 3, 2012, $136,762), ROAR [G2] ($487,507, leading sire in Argentina), BLARE OF TRUMPETS [G3] ($286,213, sire). Dam of 12 foals of racing age, including a 3-year- old of 2013, eleven to race, 8 winners, including-- Meghan’s Joy (f. by A.P. Indy). 4 wins at 2 and 3, $126,990, 2nd Carou- sel S. [L] (LRL, $15,000), etc. Dam of 6 winners, including-- HUNTING (g. by Coronado’s Quest). 5 wins at 4 and 5, $286,395, Stuy- vesant H. [G3] (AQU, $65,100), 3rd Skip Away H. [G3] (GP, $10,000), Queens County H. [G3] (AQU, $10,759). QUIET HARBOR (f. by Silver Deputy). 6 wins at 4 and 5, $274,670, Violet S.
    [Show full text]