Cumulative Report — Official

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cumulative Report — Official Cumulative Report — Official HAMILTON COUNTY, OH — PRIMARY ELECTION — May 04, 2010 Page 1 of 300 05/24/2010 12:54 PM Total Number of Voters : 112,686 of 577,824 = 19.50% Precincts Reporting 680 of 680 = 100.00% Party Candidate Early Election Total For Governor and Lieutenant Governor, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Ted Strickland and Yvette McGee Brown 9,855 100.00% 22,264 100.00% 32,119 100.00% Cast Votes: 9,855 86.85% 22,264 82.98% 32,119 84.13% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 1,492 13.15% 4,567 17.02% 6,059 15.87% For Attorney General, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Richard Cordray 8,445 100.00% 17,759 100.00% 26,204 100.00% Cast Votes: 8,445 74.42% 17,759 66.19% 26,204 68.64% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 2,902 25.58% 9,072 33.81% 11,974 31.36% For Auditor of State, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC David Pepper 9,137 100.00% 19,724 100.00% 28,861 100.00% Cast Votes: 9,137 80.52% 19,724 73.51% 28,861 75.60% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 2,210 19.48% 7,107 26.49% 9,317 24.40% For Secretary of State, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Maryellen O'Shaughnessy 8,057 100.00% 16,582 100.00% 24,639 100.00% Cast Votes: 8,057 71.01% 16,582 61.80% 24,639 64.54% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 3,290 28.99% 10,249 38.20% 13,539 35.46% For Treasurer of State, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Kevin L. Boyce 7,932 100.00% 16,369 100.00% 24,301 100.00% Cast Votes: 7,932 69.90% 16,369 61.01% 24,301 63.65% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 3,415 30.10% 10,462 38.99% 13,877 36.35% Cumulative Report — Official HAMILTON COUNTY, OH — PRIMARY ELECTION — May 04, 2010 Page 2 of 300 05/24/2010 12:54 PM Total Number of Voters : 112,686 of 577,824 = 19.50% Precincts Reporting 680 of 680 = 100.00% Party Candidate Early Election Total For United States Senator, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Jennifer Brunner 5,759 57.37% 13,703 58.86% 19,462 58.41% Lee Fisher 4,280 42.63% 9,578 41.14% 13,858 41.59% Cast Votes: 10,039 88.47% 23,281 86.77% 33,320 87.28% Over Votes: 23 0.20% 11 0.04% 34 0.09% Under Votes: 1,285 11.32% 3,539 13.19% 4,824 12.64% For Representative to Congress (First District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Steve Driehaus 6,530 85.58% 13,659 82.00% 20,189 83.13% Eric Wilson 1,100 14.42% 2,998 18.00% 4,098 16.87% Cast Votes: 7,630 94.96% 16,657 91.93% 24,287 92.86% Over Votes: 11 0.14% 2 0.01% 13 0.05% Under Votes: 394 4.90% 1,461 8.06% 1,855 7.09% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 473 473 100.00% 26,155 402,407 6.50% For Representative to Congress (Second District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC David H. Krikorian 978 33.06% 2,369 29.98% 3,347 30.82% Jim Parker 636 21.50% 852 10.78% 1,488 13.70% Surya Yalamanchili 1,344 45.44% 4,680 59.23% 6,024 55.47% Cast Votes: 2,958 89.31% 7,901 90.70% 10,859 90.32% Over Votes: 4 0.12% 6 0.07% 10 0.08% Under Votes: 350 10.57% 804 9.23% 1,154 9.60% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 212 212 100.00% 12,023 175,417 6.85% For Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Full Term Commencing 1/1/11, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Eric Brown 8,015 100.00% 16,718 100.00% 24,733 100.00% Cast Votes: 8,015 70.64% 16,718 62.31% 24,733 64.78% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 3,332 29.36% 10,113 37.69% 13,445 35.22% Cumulative Report — Official HAMILTON COUNTY, OH — PRIMARY ELECTION — May 04, 2010 Page 3 of 300 05/24/2010 12:54 PM Total Number of Voters : 112,686 of 577,824 = 19.50% Precincts Reporting 680 of 680 = 100.00% Party Candidate Early Election Total For Justice of the Supreme Court Full Term Commencing 1/1/11, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Mary Jane Trapp 7,672 100.00% 15,659 100.00% 23,331 100.00% Cast Votes: 7,672 67.61% 15,659 58.36% 23,331 61.11% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 3,675 32.39% 11,172 41.64% 14,847 38.89% For Justice of the Supreme Court Full Term Commencing 1/2/11, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC No Candidate Filed 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Cast Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% For Judge of the Court of Appeals (First District) Full Term Commencing 2/9/11, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Martha Good 7,374 100.00% 15,229 100.00% 22,603 100.00% Cast Votes: 7,374 64.99% 15,229 56.76% 22,603 59.20% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 3,973 35.01% 11,602 43.24% 15,575 40.80% For Judge of the Court of Appeals (First District) Unexpired Term Ending 2/8/13, Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC William L. Mallory, Jr. 8,481 100.00% 18,182 100.00% 26,663 100.00% Cast Votes: 8,481 74.74% 18,182 67.76% 26,663 69.84% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 2,866 25.26% 8,649 32.24% 11,515 30.16% For Member of State Central Committee, Man (Seventh District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Peter L. Cassady 1,131 77.41% 2,419 73.73% 3,550 74.86% Keir Holeman 330 22.59% 862 26.27% 1,192 25.14% Cast Votes: 1,461 65.02% 3,281 54.88% 4,742 57.65% Over Votes: 2 0.09% 3 0.05% 5 0.06% Under Votes: 784 34.89% 2,694 45.07% 3,478 42.29% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 152 152 100.00% 8,225 128,365 6.41% Cumulative Report — Official HAMILTON COUNTY, OH — PRIMARY ELECTION — May 04, 2010 Page 4 of 300 05/24/2010 12:54 PM Total Number of Voters : 112,686 of 577,824 = 19.50% Precincts Reporting 680 of 680 = 100.00% Party Candidate Early Election Total For Member of State Central Committee, Woman (Seventh District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Jennifer O’Donnell 1,513 100.00% 3,474 100.00% 4,987 100.00% Cast Votes: 1,513 67.33% 3,474 58.11% 4,987 60.63% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 734 32.67% 2,504 41.89% 3,238 39.37% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 152 152 100.00% 8,225 128,365 6.41% For Member of State Central Committee, Man (Eighth District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Joe Mallory 3,019 100.00% 6,957 100.00% 9,976 100.00% Cast Votes: 3,019 70.26% 6,957 64.08% 9,976 65.84% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 1,278 29.74% 3,899 35.92% 5,177 34.16% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 249 249 100.00% 15,153 239,814 6.32% For Member of State Central Committee, Woman (Eighth District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Veronica Ann Kistner 2,902 100.00% 6,317 100.00% 9,219 100.00% Cast Votes: 2,902 67.54% 6,317 58.19% 9,219 60.84% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 1,395 32.46% 4,539 41.81% 5,934 39.16% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 249 249 100.00% 15,153 239,814 6.32% Cumulative Report — Official HAMILTON COUNTY, OH — PRIMARY ELECTION — May 04, 2010 Page 5 of 300 05/24/2010 12:54 PM Total Number of Voters : 112,686 of 577,824 = 19.50% Precincts Reporting 680 of 680 = 100.00% Party Candidate Early Election Total For Member of State Central Committee, Man (Ninth District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Mark Mallory 3,675 100.00% 6,885 100.00% 10,560 100.00% Cast Votes: 3,675 76.51% 6,885 68.87% 10,560 71.35% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 1,128 23.49% 3,112 31.13% 4,240 28.65% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 279 279 100.00% 14,800 209,645 7.06% For Member of State Central Committee, Woman (Ninth District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Bernadette Watson 3,263 100.00% 5,927 100.00% 9,190 100.00% Cast Votes: 3,263 67.94% 5,927 59.29% 9,190 62.09% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 1,540 32.06% 4,070 40.71% 5,610 37.91% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 279 279 100.00% 14,800 209,645 7.06% For State Senator (Seventh District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Sam Pettinichi 1,416 100.00% 3,248 100.00% 4,664 100.00% Cast Votes: 1,416 63.02% 3,248 54.33% 4,664 56.71% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 831 36.98% 2,730 45.67% 3,561 43.29% Precincts Voters Counted Total Percent Ballots Registered Percent 152 152 100.00% 8,225 128,365 6.41% Cumulative Report — Official HAMILTON COUNTY, OH — PRIMARY ELECTION — May 04, 2010 Page 6 of 300 05/24/2010 12:54 PM Total Number of Voters : 112,686 of 577,824 = 19.50% Precincts Reporting 680 of 680 = 100.00% Party Candidate Early Election Total For State Senator (Ninth District), Vote For 1 DEMOCRATIC Eric H.
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Directory OHIO
    204 Congressional Directory OHIO REPRESENTATIVES FIRST DISTRICT STEVE DRIEHAUS, Democrat, of Cincinnati, OH; born in Cincinnati, June 24, 1966; edu- cation: graduated Elder High School, Cincinnati, OH, 1984; B.A., Miami University, Oxford, OH, 1988; M.P.A., Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 1995; professional: Ohio House of Representatives, 2001–09; Ohio House Minority Whip, 2005–08; Peace Corps volunteer, Senegal, 1988–90; married: Lucienne Driehaus, 1991; children: Alex, Claire, and Jack; commit- tees: Financial Services, Oversight and Government Reform; elected to the 111th Congress on November 4, 2008. Office Listings http://www.driehaus.house.gov 408 Cannon House Office Building, Washington, DC 20515 .................................... (202) 225–2216 Chief of Staff.—Greg Mecher. FAX: 225–3012 Legislative Director.—Sarah Curtis. Press Secretary.—Tim Mulvey. Scheduler / Executive Assistant.—Heidi Black. Carew Tower, 441 Vine Street, Room 3003, Cincinnati, OH 45202 ......................... (513) 684–2723 District Director.—Steve Brinker. FAX: 421–8722 Counties: BUTLER (part), HAMILTON (part). Population (2000), 630,730. ZIP Codes: 45001–02, 45013–14, 45030, 45033, 45040–41, 45051–54, 45056, 45070, 45201–21, 45223–25, 45229, 45231–34, 45236–41, 45246–48, 45250–53, 45258, 45262–64, 45267–71, 45273–74, 45277, 45280, 45296, 45298–99 *** SECOND DISTRICT JEAN SCHMIDT, Republican, of Miami Township; born in Cincinnati, OH, November 29th; education: B.A., University of Cincinnati, 1974; professional: Miami Township Trustee, 1989– 2000; Ohio House of Representatives, 2000–04; president, Right to Life of Greater Cincinnati, 2004–05; religion: Catholic; married: Peter; children: Emilie; co-chair, Congressional Pro-Life Women’s Caucus; committees: Agriculture; Transportation and Infrastructure; elected to the 109th Congress by special election on August 5, 2005; reelected to each succeeding Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Campaign Finance Reform Jurisprudence Under the Roberts Court
    Stare Indecisis: Campaign Finance Reform Jurisprudence under the Roberts Court By Andrew Leiendecker Advisor: Professor Chris Edelson, School of Public Affairs For University Honors Spring 2014 Abstract: The following research paper consists of a detailed examination of the Supreme Court’s campaign finance reform jurisprudence under the leadership of Chief Justice John Roberts. This paper examines the holdings and implications of seven primary cases: Randall v. Sorrell (2006), FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life (2007), Davis v. FEC (2008), Citizens United v. FEC (2010), Arizona Free Enterprise Club PAC v. Bennett (2011), McCutcheon v. FEC (2014), and the forthcoming Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (2014). Examining these cases three overarching problems emerge. First, the Court must reexamine and expand their definition of corruption as applied to campaign finance activities. Second, the Court has severely departed from the pre-Roberts standard (illustrated in Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce and Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC) of legislative deference on issues of campaign finance. And third, the Roberts Court’s conservative majority appears to be growing more and more comfortable with reversing or ignoring precedential campaign finance cases, including Austin, Nixon, McConnell v. FEC, and even Buckley v. Valeo. This has allowed for a dramatic reduction in the amount of campaign finance regulation in American elections, resulting in an empowering of wealthy individuals, candidates, and corporations to dominate an election cycle at the expense of the voices of everyday Americans, which threatens to undermine the public’s continued faith in our democratic process and the reputation of the Supreme Court itself.
    [Show full text]
  • OPTIONS ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS
    BRENT SPENCE BRIDGE PROJECT OPTIONS ANALYSIS SEPTEMBER 2013 TABLE of CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................... 1 CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AND LIFECYCLE COSTS ............................. 2 TRAFFIC & REVENUE .............................................................................................................. 3 RISK ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ 3 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 4 QUALITATIVE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................ 4 NEXT STEPS ............................................................................................................................ 7 1. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 8 1.1 STUDY OBJECTIVE ......................................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 STUDY PARTICIPANTS AND ADMINISTRATION ......................................................................... 8 1.1.2 THE BI-STATE MANAGEMENT TEAM’S PROJECT GOALS........................................................... 8 1.1.3 PROJECT COSTS ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.4 CONSIDERATION
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue (PDF)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2011 No. 20 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Thursday, February 10, 2011, at 4 p.m. House of Representatives WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2011 The House met at 10 a.m. and was to our kids and our grandkids and sidies in the agriculture bill for five called to order by the Speaker pro tem- won’t be paid off over 30 years. Some of crops grown in eight States that are in pore (Mr. WEBSTER). this debt will weigh upon the country. surplus and paying people not to grow f But the question is, how do we get things. That’s off-limits. That’s man- there? The deficit this year will be $1.5 datory spending. That can’t be consid- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO trillion, an unimaginable amount of ered for cuts, paying people to not TEMPORE money, borrowed, a lot of it from grow things. We can’t do away with The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- China, and that is just virtually that. We’re going to borrow the money fore the House the following commu- unfathomable. so they can get paid to not grow nication from the Speaker: Now, they’re going to dink around es- things. sentially and pretend they’re doing WASHINGTON, DC, All right. Well, how about the oil February 9, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • 13-193 Susan B. Anthony List V. Driehaus
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST ET AL. v. DRIEHAUS ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 13–193. Argued April 22, 2014—Decided June 16, 2014 Respondent Driehaus, a former Congressman, filed a complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission alleging that petitioner Susan B. An- thony List (SBA) violated an Ohio law that criminalizes certain false statements made during the course of a political campaign. Specifi- cally, Driehaus alleged that SBA violated the law when it stated that his vote for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a vote in favor of “taxpayer funded abortion.” After Driehaus lost his re-election bid, the complaint was dismissed, but SBA contin- ued to pursue a separate suit in Federal District Court challenging the law on First Amendment grounds. Petitioner Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes (COAST) also filed a First Amendment challenge to the Ohio law, alleging that it had planned to disseminate materials presenting a similar message but refrained due to the proceedings against SBA. The District Court consolidated the two lawsuits and dismissed them as nonjusticiable, concluding that neither suit presented a sufficiently concrete injury for purposes of standing or ripeness.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    IMPACT 2018REPORT BE THANY h o use services Increased Need … Increased Response SHELTER SHELTER 1 2 FAIRMOUNT WESTWOOD SHELTER SHELTER 3 4 WESTWOOD COLLEGE HILL NEW SHELTER 5 BOND HILL DEAR BETHANY HOUSE FRIENDS, It is with pride and gratitude that we share our 2018 Impact Report. Pride because of the impact we made in the lives of thousands of people this past year and gratitude because so many of YOU — individuals and families, foundations and organizations, small and large companies — stepped up to shelter our city’s most vulnerable and to close the gap in funding caused by the increased number of homeless families at our doors. Robert J. Inkrot Susan S. Schiller 2018 was a year unlike any other in our 36-year history — it was a year of increased need demanding increased response. Our four shelters were overflowing beginning in January, and Bethany House responded to the need by placing families in hotel rooms. By May, we had already sheltered a record number of families, and we were fearful of even more families arriving when the summer spike in family homelessness would begin, as it does every June. The unprecedented increase in the number of families seeking shelter required rental of a fifth shelter facility. In June of 2018, an empty group home on the property of St. Aloysius in Bond Hill became our fifth shelter, replacing the hotel beds. Our families are now scattered among five shelters in South Fairmount, Westwood, College Hill and Bond Hill. 2018 ended with the purchase of property on which to build a new facility, which will consolidate our seven buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • STANDING COMMITTEES of the HOUSE Agriculture
    STANDING COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE [Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Resident Commissioner and Delegates in boldface] [Room numbers beginning with H are in the Capitol, with CHOB in the Cannon House Office Building, with LHOB in the Longworth House Office Building, with RHOB in the Rayburn House Office Building, with H1 in O’Neill House Office Building, and with H2 in the Ford House Office Building] Agriculture 1301 Longworth House Office Building, phone 225–2171, fax 225–8510 http://agriculture.house.gov meets first Wednesday of each month Collin C. Peterson, of Minnesota, Chair Tim Holden, of Pennsylvania. Frank D. Lucas, of Oklahoma. Mike McIntyre, of North Carolina. Bob Goodlatte, of Virginia. Leonard L. Boswell, of Iowa. Jerry Moran, of Kansas. Joe Baca, of California. Timothy V. Johnson, of Illinois. Dennis A. Cardoza, of California. Sam Graves, of Missouri. David Scott, of Georgia. Mike Rogers, of Alabama. Jim Marshall, of Georgia. Steve King, of Iowa. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, of South Dakota. Randy Neugebauer, of Texas. Henry Cuellar, of Texas. K. Michael Conaway, of Texas. Jim Costa, of California. Jeff Fortenberry, of Nebraska. Brad Ellsworth, of Indiana. Jean Schmidt, of Ohio. Timothy J. Walz, of Minnesota. Adrian Smith, of Nebraska. Steve Kagen, of Wisconsin. Robert E. Latta, of Ohio. Kurt Schrader, of Oregon. David P. Roe, of Tennessee. Deborah L. Halvorson, of Illinois. Blaine Luetkemeyer, of Missouri. Kathleen A. Dahlkemper, of Pennsylvania. Glenn Thompson, of Pennsylvania. Eric J. J. Massa, of New York. Bill Cassidy, of Louisiana. Bobby Bright, of Alabama. Cynthia M. Lummis, of Wyoming. Betsy Markey, of Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Midwest: Can Recent Democratic Gains Hold?
    COVER STORY Midwest: Can Recent Democratic Gains Hold? The Midwest’s part in the “reverse realignment” — the Democrats’ answer in the North to the Republicans’ political takeover of the South — has been essential to building the current House Already running in the Sept. 14 primary are contractor majority. A number of recently elected Democrats in this region have taken root, but others Reid Ribble, county officials Andy Williams and Marc appear vulnerable: Two Ohio freshmen face rematches currently rated as tossups, as is an open Savard, state Rep. Roger Roth, physician Marc Trager, seat in Kansas. But the party isn’t only on defense, with bids for a GOP-held open seat outside and ex-state Rep. Terri McCormick. Chicago and to oust Minnesota’s conservative firebrand Michele Bachmann atop their wish list. LEAN REPUBLICAN TOSSUPS seat by 7 points in 2006 and 5 points in 2008. His chal- MINNESOTA 3 — Erik Paulsen, R KANSAS 3 — Open (Dennis Moore, D, retiring) lenger both times, marketing executive Dan Seals, is 2008: Paulsen 48%, Ashwin Madia (D) 41% 2008: Moore 56%, Nick Jordan (R) 40% trying again, but faces opposition from state Rep. Julie Paulsen, a one-time state House majority leader, was Hamos and civil rights lawyer Elliot Richardson. The Democrats knew they’d have to fight for this suburban elected two years ago upon the retirement of his mentor, primary is Feb. 2. Wealthy businessman Dick Green and Kansas City-area swing seat whenever the centrist Jim Ramstad, defying Democrats who thought the state Rep. Elizabeth Coulson lead the Republican field.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Congressional Election
    STATISTICS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010 SHOWING THE VOTE CAST FOR EACH NOMINEE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR, REPRESENTATIVE, AND DELEGATE TO THE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS, TOGETHER WITH A RECAPITULATION THEREOF COMPILED FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES BY KAREN L. HAAS CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES http://clerk.house.gov (Corrected to June 3, 2011) WASHINGTON : 2011 STATISTICS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010 (Number which precedes name of candidate designates Congressional District.) ALABAMA FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR Richard C. Shelby, Republican ................................................................. 968,181 William G. Barnes, Democrat ................................................................... 515,619 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 1,699 FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE 1. Jo Bonner, Republican .............................................................................. 129,063 David Walter, Constitution Party of Alabama ........................................ 26,357 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 861 2. Martha Roby, Republican .......................................................................... 111,645 Bobby Bright, Democrat ............................................................................ 106,865 Write-in ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Martha Roby, R Mo Brooks, R Terri A. Sewell, D Election: Defeated Rep
    THE FRESHMEN House Members ALABAMA (2) ALABAMA (5) ALABAMA (7) Martha Roby, R Mo Brooks, R Terri A. Sewell, D Election: Defeated Rep. Bobby Bright, D Election: Defeated Steve Raby, D, after defeating Pronounced: SUE-ell Residence: Montgomery Rep. Parker Griffith in the primary Election: Defeated Don Chamberlain, R, to Born: July 26, 1976; Montgomery, Ala. Residence: Huntsville succeed Artur Davis, D, who ran for governor Religion: Presbyterian Born: April 29, 1954; Charleston, S.C. Residence: Birmingham Family: Husband, Riley Roby; two children Religion: Christian Born: Jan. 1, 1965; Huntsville, Ala. Education: New York U., B.M. 1998 (music, busi- Family: Wife, Martha Brooks; four children Religion: Christian ness and technology); Samford U., J.D. 2001 Education: Duke U., B.A. 1975 (economics & Family: Single Career: Lawyer political science); U. of Alabama, J.D. 1978 Education: Princeton U., A.B. 1986 (Woodrow Political highlights: Montgomery City Council, Career: Special assistant state attorney general; Wilson School); Oxford U., M.A. 1988 (politics; 2004-present lawyer; county prosecutor Marshall Scholar); Harvard, J.D. 1992 Political highlights: Ala. House, 1983-91; Madi- Career: Lawyer son Co. district attorney, 1991-93; Madison Co. Political highlights: No previous office Commission, 1996-present; sought Republican nomination for lieutenant governor, 2006 ike others who rooks’ top priority ewell becomes Lsought congressio- Bis a constitutional Sthe first African- nal seats this year, Roby amendment requiring a American woman from is most concerned about balanced budget. “The Alabama to serve in Con- improving the job situ- most significant national gress and the first Ala- ation in her district. But security threat America bama woman of any race she also wants to weed faces are these unsustain- to be elected, rather than out “waste and inefficien- able budget deficits,” he appointed, to serve a full cy” in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Delphos Herald/Erin Cox) See AWARD, Page 12 2
    Gerow wins Obama’s Volunteer Local roundup, Service Award, p4 p6-7 The ELPHOS ERALD D Telling The Tri-County’s Story Since 1869H 50¢ daily www.delphosherald.com Wednesday, April 23, 2014 Delphos, Ohio Elida residents: water quality, price not comparable BY CYNTHIA YAHNA Judy Brennan. Herald Correspondent “I am furious about the water situation [email protected] and our water has not ever been good since 1998. You know it has been years ago that ELIDA — The hot topic of discussion at they put asbestos in buildings and they said the Elida Village Council meeting Tuesday it was safe and we all know that it is not safe. was the proposed water rate increase for They said mercury was safe and we find out consumers. that is not safe either. Are we going to find An ordinance before council to establish out the chemical that is in our water is not rates and charges for water services rendered safe years from now?” Brennan asked. “Our by the village to users within and without the taxpayers pay those in government their Honorary chairs chosen at Survivor Dinner corporation limits of Elida calls for a $30-per- salaries and they need to find out how to fix Four-year-old Addison Eickholt, above, shown with her grandparents Dan month service fee on all non-metered users this. The usage rate is crazy and we are not and Jan Miller, was chosen as the Youth Honorary Chair for the 2014 Relay inside the village and $45 per month on all being charged according to our usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerrymandering and Its Radicalizing Effect on the American Congress
    Liebold 1 Figure 1 Gerry's Gerrymander The election of 2012 saw Ohio re-elect Democrat Barack Obama President with 50.67% of the vote and Democrat Senator Sherrod Brown with 50.70%. In the same election Ohio Democrats in the General Assembly received 51% of the vote, and Ohio Democratic House candidates received 49%. Despite garnering 51% of the vote in the General Assembly Democrats only won 39% of the seats. In US House races Democrats only won 25% of the seats (Husted, 2012). Nationwide Democratic House candidates received 1.4 million more votes than their GOP counterparts but yet only gained five seats (Dickenson, 2013). In Pennsylvania Democrats carried 51% of the House vote but only won 5 of 18 seats. As in Ohio, Republican Gerrymandering1 helped to preserve and protect the Republican majorities gained during the election of 2010. This is the outcome of a strategic effort by Republicans leading up to not this election, but the 2010 election. Because of the sophistication of today’s mapmakers many incumbents were in districts so safe that they didn’t even face a general election challenger. 1 The origin of the term Gerrymander comes from the Massachusetts Governor Eldridge Gerry (pronounced Gary even though today it is pronounced like Jerry) who’s salamander shaped district pictured in figure 1 produced a district that favored his party and led to the penning of this famous political cartoon. Liebold 2 Because of that the primary election is now the most important election for the men and women of congress and it results in the most active members of each party actually choosing the representatives for many of America’s Congressional districts.
    [Show full text]