• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Pray TO Play Christian coaches and chaplains are converting football fields into mission fields © Chris Szagola/NewSport/Corbis This report was financed, researched, and written by the Freedom From Religion Foundation. FFRF is a national membership association of approximately 23,000 freethinkers: atheists, agnostics and skeptics. The Foundation is a non-profit, tax-exempt, educational organization under Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3). Incorporated in 1978 in Wisconsin, FFRF has two main purposes: (1) to promote the constitutional separation between state and church, and (2) to educate the public on matters relating to nontheism. FFRF.org FFRF’s legal staf spent more than 12 months investigating this report. We dedicate it to the memory of Anne Nicol Gaylor, FFRF’s founder and a visionary firebrand that sought to protect citizens’ freedom of thought. Principal researchers, authors, and investigators of this report Andrew L. Seidel is a staf attorney and constitutional consultant at FFRF. Mr. Seidel has two law degrees, one magna cum laude the other with a perfect GPA and studied international human rights law at the University of Amsterdam. Tulane Law gave him the Haber J. McCarthy Award and Denver Law gave him the Outstanding LLM Award—both for being top of his discipline. His undergraduate degree, a cum laude BS, is in neuroscience. Patrick Elliott is a staf attorney at FFRF. He received a degree in legal studies and political science from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received his Juris Doctor from the University of Wisconsin Law School and is a member of the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Civil Rights division. Mr. Elliott specializes in state/church advocacy and litigation. Neal Fitzgerald is a law clerk at FFRF attends the University of Wisconsin Law School (class of ‘16). This is his second summer clerking with FFRF. Chris Line is a law clerk at FFRF attends the University of Wisconsin Law School (class of ‘17). This is his first summer clerking with FFRF. ©2015 Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. Pray TO Play Christian coaches and chaplains are converting football fields into mission fields “If somebody comes into my territory, my zone, I want to hit him hard. … I’ll hit him with all the love of Jesus I can muster.” Gill Byrd, San Jose State, San Diego Chargers, Tampa Bay Buccaneers (1991)1 “God does not give a damn what goes on in athletics. Nor should he.” Bob Knight, Indiana University basketball coach (1985)2 Public universities and their employees cannot endorse, Tough this report focuses on chaplaincies for football teams, promote, or favor religion. Yet, many football coaches at public they exist for other collegiate sports as well, particularly universities bring in chaplains—ofen from their own church or basketball. Te chaplaincies vary in structure, but are even members of their own family—to prey on and pray with functionally identical. Chaplains lead teams in bible study, students, with no regard for the rights of those students or the chapel services, and pre-and post-game prayers. Chaplains Constitution. Tese coaches are converting playing felds into receive money, tickets, meals, and free travel on the mission felds and public universities are doing nothing to halt university’s, or more accurately, the students’ and taxpayers’ this breach of trust. Tey are failing their student athletes. dime. Occasionally, so do the chaplains’ wives. Coaches regularly fundraise for the chaplain, using their infuence Te purpose of this report is to expose this unconstitutional and position to direct funds to religious organizations system, encourage universities to fx it, and stimulate rather than the school or athletic program. At least one further eforts to protect students’ rights of conscience. chaplain appears to preach creationism to his athletes. Te facts laid out in this report, ofen in If an athlete is willing to Tese chaplaincies raise serious legal the words of the coaches or chaplains issues for the university, and the coercive challenge this system, FFRF themselves, leave universities no nature of the coach-athlete relationship room to defend these chaplaincies as will help. exacerbates those issues. Coaches control accommodations of student athletes’ many aspects of their players lives and are religion or as truly voluntary options. now extending that reach to athletes’ private religious beliefs. Nor can religion, historically a divisive force, be claimed An atheist football player on a ranked football team, speaking to unify today’s diverse student body. Barely half of college to us on condition of anonymity, told us that the head coach students (54%) now consider themselves Christian, yet had him lead a team prayer. Te player felt he had no choice 100% of the chaplains we investigated are Christian. but to comply. Coach suggestions, even if they violate the 3 Pray to Play Freedom From Religion Foundation players’ religion or lack thereof, are not viewed as optional. We received few of the records we requested. For instance, the Ofentimes, they are simply mandatory, as Arian Foster recently universities provided very few emails or other communication explained regarding his time at the University of Tennessee. and almost no policies. Some records, such as the FCA business proposal to the University of Washington, are very Tis system has a catch-22: because of the coercive power illuminating. Tis helpful information was supplemented dynamic in the coach-athlete relationship, any student with independent research and interviews with an atheist athlete with the courage to challenge this system will player at a ranked football program. Despite these refusals sufer. It would take an exceptionally brave student to risk and the sporadic information, the records and research losing his scholarship, diploma, and future. If an athlete conclusively show that coaches are imposing their religion on is willing to challenge this system, FFRF will help. players and that chaplains are the tools for this imposition. Research for this report was conducted over the past year and included inspecting hundreds of pages Student athletes are “uniquely of university records. Te report examines: susceptible to coercion” from coaches. 1. Te unique position student athletes occupy and their susceptibility to religious Coaches control players’ education, coercion by coaches and chaplains. futures, and, to a certain extent, fnances 2. Te extensive public fnancing of these chaplaincies, Coaches control players’ prospects for future careers, including direct payments to chaplains, paying for in professional sports and otherwise. Players that the chaplain and his family to travel, and using the obey coaches and ft in with the team are more university’s infuence and resources to fundraise secure in their scholarships and playing time, and for the chaplains’ religious organizations. therefore in their education and future career.3 3. Schools portraying chaplains as legitimate, ofcial members of the coaching staf. Players have an enormous fnancial incentive to remain on the team and consequently, to remain in the coach’s good 4. Te use of religion and chaplains in recruiting graces.4 Tey ofen receive scholarships for an education players, ofen to skirt NCAA rules. that would otherwise leave them with a mountain of debt. 5. Te recent history of chaplaincies, most of which “Coaches place tremendous pressure on the players . .. If a can be traced to Bobby Bowden, Tommy Tuberville, player falls into disfavor with the coaching staf, he may be and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. ‘recruited over,’ that is, replaced by a newer player. Coaches 6. Te true purpose and actual efect of the chaplaincies, ofen encourage players who have been recruited over to which is to promote the coach’s personal religion quit the team or to transfer.” 5 Tis level of control is ofen by and to convert athletes to that religion. design. For instance, many schools shifed from “four-year to one-year athletics scholarships … to create a mechanism by 7. Te legal problems these issues raise for universities. which university athletic programs could maintain pressure 8. A model policy for public universities to adopt and on the scholarship athlete throughout his college career.”6 a discussion of the misconception at the heart of this issue: that religion, and specifcally Christianity, is But that father-son-like relationship means required to be a complete or good human being. coaches need to tread even more carefully As part of this investigation, we focused on schools that when it comes to students’ rights of conscience. appeared to have the most fagrant chaplaincies and That relationship should not be used as a examined records documenting these programs, including: license to convert the trusting student athlete to • Policies concerning coach or clergy- the coach’s religion. led prayers for student athletes • Records of team religious services, prayer Tat fnancial and educational control extends to a gatherings, bible studies, etc. player’s future prospects. Coaches control playing time • All communications, including email, and therefore the player’s output. And even though between coaches and the chaplain less than 2% of college athletes have professional • Records relating to the chaplain traveling with the team careers, coaches have signifcant control over who will, because they control who plays and when. • Records related to fnancial payments or reimbursements made to the chaplain 4 Pray to Play Freedom From Religion Foundation One of those student athletes who went pro, Arian Foster, is well known and widely documented: “players frequently recently came out of the closet as an atheist in a video for develop an enduring emotional bond with their coach.”17 the Openly Secular campaign and in an ESPN interview.7 Tis is admirable and much needed for some young men. According to that interview, Foster explained that “[t]he But that father-son-like relationship means coaches need to separation of church and football -- not to mention church tread even more carefully when it comes to students’ rights of and public education -- blurred at [the University of] conscience.

Load more

  38

Copy Link