5 January 2017 Asia Pacific/Taiwan Equity Research Semiconductor Devices

Asia Semiconductor Sector Research Analysts THEME Randy Abrams, CFA 886 2 2715 6366 [email protected] Mature volumes, but still maturing content Jerry Su 886 2 2715 6361 drivers [email protected] Sam Li Figure 1: CS estimates—high single-digit growth in 2017/18 852 2101 6775 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E [email protected] New Estimate 1,019,432 1,303,395 1,437,414 1,457,378 1,555,406 1,681,478 Kyna Wong YoY 41% 28% 10% 1% 7% 8% 852 2101 6950 Old Estimate 1,019,432 1,303,395 1,438,029 1,503,503 1,559,379 1,614,111 [email protected] YoY 41% 28% 10% 5% 4% 4% Haas Liu Revision (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -3.1% -0.3% 4.2% 886 2 2715 6365 [email protected] Source: Credit Suisse estimates

■ 2017 could see mild units and some ASP stabilisation. Our global hardware team in its annual wireless preview on 6 Dec 2016 adjusted 2016 down from +5% to +1% (based on IDC's actuals through 3Q16), but off a lower base increased 2017/18 growth from +4%/4% to 7%/8% YoY to reflect the rebound from Apple's iPhone 8 in 2H17 and some upgrade demand in emerging markets. Smartphone revenue is projected to grow 1%/5% YoY in 2017/2018 as ASP declines moderate from -7% YoY toward -3% YoY by 2018. ■ Content and spec upgrades offer some upside in a slow growth market. Despite only mild smartphone unit growth, the leaders in the tech supply chain should continue to benefit from the continued innovation in handsets through spec upgrade. We expect key content drivers in 2017 to include: sensor (non-Apple rising from 30% to 47%), OLED display (rising from 21% to 26%), dual camera (vendors seeing orders for 20-25%, though CS at 10-15% based on supply constraints), USB Type-C, continued memory capacity growth and CAT 7+ modem upgrades in . ■ Competitive pressure persists in mobile processors. We stay conservative on Mediatek as market share gains reverse and units slow from high 2016 rates. We expect Mediatek to track the low-end of 4Q16 guidance and lower 1Q17 sales from -2% QoQ to -12% QoQ off the lower base. Margins may stabilise but cost improvement needs to wait until 2H17. We maintain NEUTRAL and our NT$225 target price is based on 14x 2017E EPS of $16. ■ Some opportunities still in Foundry, RF and components. We are still conservative on the smartphone opportunity but see investment opportunities where content gains continue and margins are protected by innovation and competitive advantage. Our top picks in the chain include: (1) foundry (TSMC, Win Semi), (2) back-end (Powertech, Chipbond), (3) IC design (Egis, FocalTech), (4) components (Sunny Optical, Lens Tech and AAC Acoustics).

DISCLOSURE APPENDIX AT THE BACK OF THIS REPORT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS, LEGAL ENTITY DISCLOSURE AND THE STATUS OF NON-US ANALYSTS. US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

5 January 2017

Focus tables and charts Figure 2: Summary of Credit Suisse's estimates (in millions, unless otherwise stated) CS Global Model 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 16-18 CAGR 12-15 CAGR Mobile subscribers 6,155 6,545 6,890 7,215 7,538 7,861 8,141 3.9% 5.4% Smartphone subscribers 1,191 1,836 2,593 3,321 3,838 4,370 4,862 12.5% 40.8% % penetration 19.3% 28.1% 37.6% 46.0% 50.9% 55.6% 59.7% 55.4% 32.8% Net additions 430 645 757 729 517 531 493 Replacements 295 374 547 709 940 1,024 1,189 12.5% 33.9% Replacement rate 2.6 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.7 Smartphone units 725 1,019 1,303 1,437 1,457 1,555 1,681 7.4% 25.6% YoY 46.7% 40.5% 27.9% 10.3% 1.4% 6.7% 8.1% ASPs $329 $283 $249 $252 $233 $221 $215 -4.0% -8.5% YoY -8.9% -14.0% -12.1% 1.2% -7.4% -5.0% -3.0% Revenue $238.6 $288.4 $324.2 $361.7 $339.4 $344.1 $360.9 3.1% 14.9% Smartphone Revenue YoY 33.7% 20.9% 12.4% 11.6% -6.1% 1.4% 4.9% Source: Credit Suisse estimates Figure 3: China 4G ramp up nearly over by late 2017 Figure 4: Non-Apple smartphone fingerprint penetration to reach 65% by 2018E China 4G subscriber base (mn) China 4G penetration 1,500 100% 1,350 90% 1,200 80% 1,050 70% 900 60% 750 50% 600 40% 450 30% 300 20% 150 10%

0 0%

Jul-14 Jul-15 Jul-16 Jul-17

Jan-16 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-17

Mar-17 Mar-14 Mar-15 Mar-16

Nov-16 Sep-14 Nov-14 Sep-15 Nov-15 Sep-16 Sep-17 Nov-17

May-14 May-15 May-16 May-17 Total 4G subscribers 4G penetration Source: Gartner Source: Credit Suisse estimates Figure 5: OLED penetration in global smartphones Figure 6: China has gained, but watch iPhone in 2H (mn unit) Units: mn YoY (%) 1,800 35% 150 225% 1,750 135 200% 30% 120 175% 1,700 25% 105 150% 1,650 90 125% 1,600 20% 75 100% 1,550 15% 60 75% 1,500 45 50% 10% 30 25% 1,450 5% 15 0% 1,400

- -25%

1Q12 1Q16 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2Q16 3Q16 1,350 0% 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E

Total units (lhs) OLED penetration rate China ex-AAPL/SEC units Apple units YoY Ex-AAPL/SEC YoY Source: Gartner Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Figure 7: Helio declines in 4Q on a shift to exports Figure 8: Mediatek's stock pressured by lower GMs Revenue (NT$bn) Helio % of Mediatek sales Mediatek Stock GM / OpMs (%) $50 40% Price (NT$) $700 70% $45 35% $40 $600 60% 30% $35 $500 50% 25% $30 $400 40% $25 20% $300 30% $20 15% $200 20% $15 10% $100 10% $10 $5 5% $0 0%

$0 0%

2Q02 1Q15 1Q03 4Q03 3Q04 2Q05 1Q06 4Q06 3Q07 2Q08 1Q09 4Q09 3Q10 2Q11 1Q12 4Q12 3Q13 2Q14 4Q15 3Q16 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16E 4Q16E 3Q01 3G 4G Mainstream 4G Helio 4G Helio Share price Corporate GM % Corporate OpM % Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Qorvo, Credit Suisse

Asia Semiconductor Sector 2 5 January 2017

China smartphone supply chain valuation

Figure 9: Valuation summary of Credit Suisse's smartphone supply chain coverage (in millions, unless otherwise stated) Price Target Investment Target Mkt Cap EV/Sales (x) P/E Multiple (x) P/B Multiple (x) ROE Trough/Peak (EV/Sales) Company Ticker 1/3/2017 Local Curcy Rating Upside (US$mn) 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 2015 2016 2017 Fabless MediaTek 2454.TW 218.0 225.0 Neutral 3% $10,588 0.9 0.7 0.6 13.0 15.0 13.6 1.4 1.4 1.3 10.8 9.1 9.7 QCOM 65.4 NA Restricted NA $96,588 4.0 4.4 4.3 14.0 15.2 12.6 3.4 3.3 3.2 24.3 21.7 25.2 Realtek 2379.TW 100.5 133.5 Outperform 33% $1,572 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 20.9 15.7 12.0 2.3 2.3 2.1 10.9 14.8 17.9 Novatek 3034.TW 107.0 131.0 Outperform 22% $2,027 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 10.2 13.3 11.5 2.3 2.9 2.7 22.6 21.9 23.7 Focaltech 3545.TW 35.8 45.0 Outperform 26% $323 0.0 -0.3 -0.3 44.4 63.2 12.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 2.1 1.5 7.5 Himax HIMX 6.2 12.0 Outperform 93% $1,069 1.5 1.3 1.3 42.5 16.9 14.1 2.4 2.2 2.1 5.6 13.2 15.0 Elan 2458.TW 35.0 31.0 Underperform -11% $465 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 18.7 18.9 16.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 11.2 11.5 12.9 Egistec 6462.TWO 253.5 300.0 Outperform 18% $513 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 NA 135.2 12.7 12.9 11.6 6.1 -6.7 8.6 47.6 Foundry TSMC 2330.TW 183.0 205.0 Outperform 12% $147,019 -0.2 -0.2 -0.2 16.5 14.5 13.5 3.9 3.4 3.1 23.5 23.8 22.8 UMC 2303.TW 11.4 13.0 Neutral 14% $4,439 0.8 0.9 0.9 10.6 15.5 16.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 5.9 4.1 3.9 SMIC 0981.HK 11.6 10.9 Neutral -6% $6,374 2.7 2.4 2.2 22.6 16.1 16.2 1.7 1.5 1.4 7.6 9.6 8.5 Hua Hong 1347.HK 8.7 11.0 Outperform 26% $1,147 1.3 1.3 1.1 10.3 9.7 10.0 0.8 0.8 0.7 7.5 7.8 7.3 Win Semi 3105.TWO 89.5 103.7 Outperform 16% $1,129 3.0 2.8 2.3 13.8 11.8 11.0 2.1 2.1 1.9 15.5 17.5 17.2 IDM INTC 36.6 40.0 Outperform 9% $173,447 3.0 3.0 2.8 15.7 13.8 12.9 2.8 2.6 2.3 18.4 19.5 18.4 Samsung 005930.KS 1824000.0 2400000.0 Outperform 32% $210,902 1.2 1.2 1.0 13.9 11.9 8.8 1.4 1.2 1.1 10.0 10.4 12.6 Back-end packaging Amkor AMKR 10.7 8.5 Neutral -20% $2,531 1.2 0.9 0.8 43.9 19.5 16.3 2.1 1.8 1.6 4.8 9.4 10.1 Chipbond 6147.TWO 46.8 55.0 Outperform 18% $939 2.1 1.8 1.6 14.7 15.9 11.9 1.3 1.3 1.2 8.8 8.1 10.2 Panel AUO 2409.TW 12.0 16.0 Outperform 33% $3,563 0.4 0.6 0.5 23.4 26.1 8.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.7 2.5 6.9 Innolux 3481.TW 12.1 15.0 Outperform 24% $3,746 0.4 0.5 0.4 11.1 N/A 6.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 4.7 -1.4 7.5 LG Display 034220.KS 31750.0 25800.0 Neutral -19% $9,331 0.5 0.5 0.5 12.0 28.2 21.5 0.9 0.9 1.0 7.6 3.4 4.7 Japan Display 6740.T 333.0 220.0 Neutral -34% $1,797 0.2 0.2 0.3 N/A N/A -11.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 -3.0 -8.3 -2.9 Sharp 6753.T 270.0 120.0 Underperform -56% $12,336 0.8 0.8 0.8 N/A N/A -34.3 2.4 15.2 -10.6 -197.4 -299.7 -34.8 Smartphone brands Coolpad 2369.HK 0.8 0.6 Underperform -24% $513 0.2 0.2 0.2 N/A -6.5 -18.1 0.5 0.7 0.8 -4.5 -11.2 -4.2 ZTE 0763.HK 12.9 12.7 Neutral -2% $9,724 0.8 0.7 0.5 16.7 14.2 13.2 1.8 1.7 1.5 10.8 11.7 11.6 0992.HK 4.8 7.0 Outperform 46% $7,013 0.2 0.2 0.2 8.0 N/A 12.4 1.6 2.3 2.5 20.3 -4.0 20.3 Smartphone components Largan 3008.TW 3795.0 4100.0 Outperform 8% $15,709 8.3 9.6 7.1 21.1 22.1 16.0 8.0 7.4 5.5 38.1 33.4 34.4 Catcher 2474.TW 225.5 295.0 Outperform 31% $5,305 1.6 1.8 1.3 6.9 9.2 8.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 21.7 16.3 15.7 AAC 2018.HK 70.6 86.9 Outperform 23% $2,437 6.6 5.2 4.1 27.9 22.2 17.5 7.7 6.3 5.2 27.5 28.5 29.7 VPEC 2455.TW 48.5 46.5 Neutral -4% $278 3.1 3.8 3.3 15.1 17.6 15.7 2.5 4.9 4.8 16.5 27.9 30.7 TXC 3042.TW 40.8 45.0 Neutral 10% $390 1.2 1.2 1.0 13.5 12.5 11.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 8.7 9.7 10.4 Merry 2439.TW 122.5 120.0 Neutral -2% $700 1.7 1.3 1.1 35.3 16.5 15.0 3.9 3.7 3.4 11.0 22.6 22.8 Sunny Optical 2382.HK 34.1 44.6 Outperform 31% $4,642 3.2 2.3 2.0 48.4 32.3 24.1 9.6 7.8 6.3 19.9 24.3 26.0 Tongda 0698.HK 2.0 2.2 Neutral 8% $1,528 2.1 1.7 1.4 17.2 13.3 10.9 3.0 2.7 2.4 17.3 20.5 21.7 O-Film 002456.SZ 32.2 40.7 Neutral 27% $4,579 2.1 1.5 1.0 69.3 42.1 26.3 5.5 3.7 3.3 7.9 8.7 12.4 Truly 0732.HK 2.9 3.3 Neutral 13% $1,091 0.6 0.7 0.6 10.0 11.6 10.6 1.2 1.1 1.1 11.9 9.7 9.9 FIH Mobile 2038.HK 2.5 2.8 Neutral 12% $2,603 0.1 0.2 0.2 11.0 28.9 18.1 0.7 0.7 0.7 6.1 2.3 3.7 BYDE 1211.HK 41.4 77.0 Outperform 86% $939 2.0 1.4 1.2 36.3 21.9 27.0 3.2 2.3 2.2 8.7 10.4 8.1 Median 1.2 1.2 1.0 15.4 15.7 12.6 1.8 1.8 1.5 10.8 10.4 12.2 Mean 1.6 1.5 1.3 21.1 18.5 11.5 2.4 2.6 1.7 6.6 3.6 12.7 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Asia Semiconductor Sector 3 5 January 2017

Mature volumes, but still maturing content drivers In coordination with our global hardware team's industry smartphone update in December, we publish our annual smartphone outlook report for the Asia Semiconductor Sector. The revised estimates are for mild mid-high single digit unit growth and some stabilisation in blended pricing with a lift from iPhone 8 in 2H17 and a shift from entry level to replacement smartphone buyers in emerging markets. We remain selective on component and IC picks given some ongoing margin pressure and provide implications for the Asian supply chain. 2017 smartphones could see mild units but stabilising ASPs Our global hardware team revised its smartphone unit estimates for 2016 to 1.457bn (+1% YoY), down from prior 1.504bn (+5% YoY) which is based on IDC through nine months and reflects a slowdown in the high-end brands (Apple and Samsung) and may also be undercounting some of the smaller China smartphone brands. For 2017/2018, our team maintains near similar estimates, with decent growth from a lower base now at 1.555bn in 2017 (+7% YoY) and 1.681bn in 2018 (+8% YoY), up from prior +4% YoY growth estimates for both 2017/2018. Our team also projects ASP erosion moderating from -7% YoY in 2016 toward -3% YoY by 2018 due to a lift from iPhone and replacement upgrades. Content and specs provide some lift to the outlook Despite slowing smartphone unit growth, the leaders in the supply chain should continue to benefit from the continued innovation in handsets through spec upgrades. We highlight the specs which will be more widely adopted, including (1) fingerprint continuing fast penetration for non-Apple smartphones from 400mn in 2016 to 610mn in 2017, (2) OLED continuing to grow from 21% to 26% driven by Apple and Samsung though Chinese brands may be capped by supply constraints and could adopt more TDDI solutions to achieve thinner structure, (3) dual camera rising with CS assuming 10-15% but some Android camera module vendors seeing potential for 20-25% if China brands can secure supply, (4) LTE shifts toward CAT 7+, benefiting RF content, (5) memory densities maintain their upward pace, and (6) USB Type C sees more adoption, and VR gains some more adoption with Daydream and low-cost Chinese built models. Competitive pressure persists in mobile processors Despite the continuing consolidation in merchant mobile processors, the market remains a competitive challenge with Qualcomm still controlling the high-end merchant market but aggressively battling Mediatek in the entry to mainstream, with Spreadtrum still a factor in the 3G market. We believe Mediatek's share gains are slightly reversing through late 2016. We believe Mediatek only achieved the lower-end of guidance for 4Q16 and trim our sales estimate from -10% QoQ to -12% QoQ versus -7-15% QoQ guidance due to slower sales from India and a late-year slowdown in China. We also expect Mediatek to see a sales decline in 1Q17 that could rival traditional seasonality down 10-15% QoQ, and now cut our 1Q17 estimate from -1% to -12% QoQ off a lower 4Q base. Margins may stabilise in the mid-30% level although new chipsets offering cost reductions for the mass market tier would only launch from the middle of 2017 and cross over volume in 2H17. Stay selective positioning in the Asian supply chain We are somewhat muted on the smartphone outlook but see opportunities where content gains continue and margins are protected by innovation and competitive advantage, benefiting (1) foundry (TSMC, Win Semi), (2) back-end (Powertech, Chipbond), (3) IC design (Egis, FocalTech), (4) components (Sunny Optical, Lens Tech and AAC Acoustics).

Asia Semiconductor Sector 4 5 January 2017

2017 smartphones could see mild units but stabilising ASPs CS estimates +7%/+8% In our annual smartphone outlook published in December 2016, our global hardware team YoY smartphone unit revised its smartphone unit estimates to reflect a lower 2016, though it largely kept growth in 2017/18 2017/2018 intact and now projects a decent unit growth off a lower base. The revised estimates have 2016 at 1.457bn (+1% YoY), down from prior 1.504bn (+5% YoY) which is based on IDC through nine months and reflects a slowdown in the high-end brands (Apple and Samsung) and may also be undercounting some of the smaller China smartphone brands. For 2017/2018, our team maintains near similar estimates, with decent growth from a lower base now at 1.555bn in 2017 (+7% YoY) and 1.681bn in 2018 (+8% YoY), up from prior +4% YoY growth estimates for both 2017/2018.

Figure 10: Revising down our smartphone estimates from 2015-2017 (in millions, unless otherwise stated) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E New Estimate 304,681 494,447 725,476 1,019,432 1,303,395 1,437,414 1,457,378 1,555,406 1,681,478 YoY 62% 47% 41% 28% 10% 1% 7% 8% Old Estimate 304,681 494,447 725,476 1,019,432 1,303,395 1,438,029 1,503,503 1,559,379 1,614,111 YoY 62% 47% 41% 28% 10% 5% 4% 4% Revision (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -3.1% -0.3% 4.2% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

We expect a mild improvement in 2017 unit growth with the launch of iPhone 8 helping the high-end in 2H17 and also from emerging markets where 4G and overall smartphone penetration still has room to expand. Our team also projects ASP erosion moderating from -7% YoY in 2016 towards -3% YoY by 2018 as the iPhone enters another replacement cycle and some emerging markets move from new smartphone additions to upgrade smartphone replacements. The total revenue for the industry in this scenario would rebound from -6% YoY in 2016 to +1% in 2017 and +5% YoY in 2018.

Figure 11: Summary of Credit Suisse's smartphone estimates (in millions, unless otherwise stated) CS Global Model 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 16-18 CAGR Mobile subscribers 6,155 6,545 6,890 7,215 7,538 7,861 8,141 3.9% Smartphone subscribers 1,191 1,836 2,593 3,321 3,838 4,370 4,862 12.5% % penetration 19.3% 28.1% 37.6% 46.0% 50.9% 55.6% 59.7% 55.4% Net additions 430 645 757 729 517 531 493 Replacements 295 374 547 709 940 1,024 1,189 12.5% Replacement rate 2.6 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.7 Smartphone units 725 1,019 1,303 1,437 1,457 1,555 1,681 7.4% YoY 46.7% 40.5% 27.9% 10.3% 1.4% 6.7% 8.1% ASPs $329 $283 $249 $252 $233 $221 $215 -4.0% YoY -8.9% -14.0% -12.1% 1.2% -7.4% -5.0% -3.0% Revenue $238.6 $288.4 $324.2 $361.7 $339.4 $344.1 $360.9 3.1% Smartphone Revenue YoY 33.7% 20.9% 12.4% 11.6% -6.1% 1.4% 4.9%

Upside Penetration 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 16-18 CAGR Mobile subscribers 6,155 6,545 6,890 7,215 7,538 7,861 8,141 4.4% Smartphone subscribers 1,191 1,836 2,593 3,321 3,838 4,443 5,057 15.7% % penetration 19.3% 28.1% 37.6% 46.0% 50.9% 56.5% 62.1% 51.2% Net additions 430 645 757 729 517 605 614 Replacements 295 374 547 709 940 1,126 1,303 26.0% Replacement rate 2.6 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.4 Smartphone units 725 1,019 1,303 1,437 1,457 1,731 1,917 9.7% YoY 46.7% 40.5% 27.9% 10.3% 1.4% 18.7% 10.8% ASPs $329 $283 $249 $252 $233 $221 $215 -6.2% YoY -8.9% -14.0% -12.1% 1.2% -7.4% -5.0% -3.0% Revenue $238.6 $288.4 $324.2 $361.7 $339.4 $382.9 $411.4 2.9% YoY 33.7% 20.9% 12.4% 11.6% -6.1% 12.8% 7.4% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Asia Semiconductor Sector 5 5 January 2017

Smartphone units could grow 10% returning to 2014 replacement rates We would note that global smartphone units are slowing both due to higher penetration of smartphone users already and a deceleration in the replacement cycle, which has pushed out from two years in 2010 when demand was limited to high-end consumers to 3.5 years in 2016. The mix shift to emerging markets, less innovation in high-end smartphones and purchase of refurbished models has dampened the replacement cycle. While our baseline smartphone industry model projects a mild improvement in revenue as pricing pressure eases, rising penetration rates of smartphones in emerging markets outside China and a reacceleration in global replacement rates would provide shipments upside to our industry model. An improvement in In our upside case, we believe the smartphone demand could reaccelerate in 2017 to 19% replacement rates back growth based on a shorter replacement cycle at 3.4 years back to 2014 levels (vs. base to 2014 levels would case 3.7 years). New subscriber penetration is also a swing factor, with our global model maintain 10%+ YoY unit now assuming new additions slowing from ~750mn in 2014-2015 to 531mn in 2017 and growth 493mn in 2018 from a higher base though we would note it could add 100-200mn units to the global estimate if emerging market 3G/4G subscriber growth keeps global smartphone penetration growth at 5.5% a year. A revised scenario of reaccelerating replacement rate at 3.4 years and 600mn net additions would lift growth to +13%/+7% in 2017/18. Chipset shipments tracking a bit above the smartphone unit shipments Our analysis of chipset vendors also points to a more robust +4% YoY increase in smartphone chipset shipments in 2016 versus the +1% YoY smartphone growth, due to combination of small vendor undercounting, channel fill inventory and some unsold/obsolete final product. Asian vendors performed well in 2016, outgrowing again at +22% YoY growth, well above the industry on strong shipments growth from Mediatek into entry level LTE and Hi-Silicon into more of 's internal phones.

Figure 12: Asian chipset vendors' growth share now more moderate (in millions, unless otherwise stated) Global chipsets 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2016 share 15-17 CAGR Mediatek 10.0 109.8 223.2 356.4 395.4 500.1 530.1 32% 16% Mediatek share (%) 2% 14% 21% 26% 27% 32% 32% Spreadtrum 0.2 32.0 120.6 160.0 200.0 220.0 230.0 14% 7% Leadcore 3.0 5.0 12.0 16.0 15.0 13.0 11.0 1% -14% Hi-Silicon - - 2.6 15.4 48.2 70.0 85.0 5% 33% Asian suppliers 13.2 146.8 358.4 547.8 658.5 803.1 856.1 52% 14% YoY Growth 1010% 144% 53% 20% 22% 7% Share 2% 19% 34% 40% 44% 52% 52% Qualcomm (80% of MSM to SPs) 416.8 492.8 598.4 735.2 722.4 648.0 680.4 42% -3% Samsung (integrated) - - - 30.0 70.0 90.0 110.0 6% 25% Intel 85.5 51.4 26.1 21.0 15.0 5.0 - 0% -100% Broadcom 8.0 8.0 8.0 5.0 - - - 0% NM Marvell 37.9 48.0 42.8 40.0 20.0 - - 0% NM ST-Ericsson 50.0 40.0 20.0 - - - - 0% NM Overseas suppliers 598.1 640.3 695.3 831.2 827.4 743.0 790.4 48% -2% YoY Growth 7% 9% 20% 0% -10% 6% Share 98% 81% 66% 60% 56% 48% 48% Total Industry chipset sell-in 611.4 787.1 1,053.6 1,379.0 1,485.9 1,546.1 1,646.5 100% 5% YoY Growth 29% 34% 31% 8% 4% 6%

Industry Smartphone sell-in 494.4 725.5 1,019.4 1,303.7 1,437.4 1,457.4 1,555.4 94% 4% YoY Growth 47% 41% 28% 10% 1% 7% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Our bottoms up projects near similar +6% YoY growth in 2017, with Mediatek in our coverage more closely matching the industry as it gains some inroads into low-end Samsung phones but offset by some share loss to Qualcomm in 1H17 at the mid-high end

Asia Semiconductor Sector 6 5 January 2017

of the China market from brands launching super-regional models or satisfying China Mobile's CAT 7 LTE baseband requirement for their premium models. China units based on Emerging market focus shifts from China to other MIIT and China Mobile's projections may have developing markets topped 500mn units, setting up a tough Following strong 4G upgrades in China in 2016, that market should now mature from a compare for 2017 higher base. Our global model projects China at 447mn, although chipset shipments topped 500mn and carrier feedback also suggests a higher estimate. China Mobile recently indicated to its supply chain it sold 400mn units in 2016 and planned similar shipments in 2017, giving the market over 500mn units factoring in China Telecom and China Unicom paced over 100mn 4G subscriber additions. China's MIIT (Ministry of Industry and Information Technology) also indicated total smartphone shipments grew +13% YoY with LTE +18% YoY through November, also ahead of IDC and our global model based on those figures. Figure 13: China smartphone shipments up mid- teens Figure 14: China 4G additions +10% YoY in 2016 China smartphones (mn) YTD YoY % China 4G subscriber net adds YTD (Mn) Net adds YTD (%) 500 20% 400 100% 400 15% 360 90% 300 10% 320 80% 200 280 70% 100 5% 240 60% - 0% 200 50% (100) -5% 160 40% (200) -10% 120 30% (300) 80 20% (400) -15% 40 10% (500) -20% Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec - 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 2014 2015 2016 2014 YTD YoY 2015 YTD YoY 2016 YTD YoY 2014 2015 2016 2016 YTD YoY

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Source: Company data, Credit Suisse 4G penetration has one year left to ramp up in China, further room in other emerging markets Off a higher base, however, China growth should moderate in 2017. China subscriber penetration of 3G and 4G is now much higher and leaves less room for growth from new smartphone subscribers. Following last year's surge in 4G addition, we would note 3G+4G penetration in China has increased from 64% at the end of 2015 to 80% at the end of 2016 and we expect it will reach 98% by the end of 2017 (3G 20% and 4G 78%). The market LTE shipments have also now stabilised the past six months already at 90%+ of shipments, leaving less room now for 3G to 4G conversion of units in China. Figure 16: China has gained, though iPhone 8 could Figure 15: China 4G crosses over 3G this year repeat the modest gains seen with iPhone 6 in 4Q14 Subscriber base (mn) Penetration (%) Units: mn YoY (%) 1,500 100% 150 225% 1,350 90% 135 200% 1,200 80% 120 175% 1,050 70% 105 150% 900 60% 90 125% 750 50% 75 100% 60 75% 600 40% 45 50% 450 30% 30 25% 300 20% 15 0% 150 10%

- -25%

1Q12 1Q16 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 2Q16 3Q16 0 0% 1Q10 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2G subscriber base 3G subscriber base 4G subscriber base China ex-AAPL/SEC Samsung units Apple units YoY Ex-AAPL/SEC YoY 2G penetration 3G penetration 4G penetration

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Source: Company data, Credit Suisse

Asia Semiconductor Sector 7 5 January 2017

The China market (over 500mn units in 2016) was fueled by a 4G upgrade cycle that could be near complete in 2017. After that growth, the market will largely be replacements, and over 500mn units is already a reasonable 2.5-year replacement rate for the country's 1.3bn subscription plans, implying modest growth after the 4G upgrade cycle is complete. China brands dominate locally, though may partially reverse in 2H17

Figure 17: China’s smartphone market growth remain modest through 2017E (in millions, unless otherwise stated) China Smartphone Market 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 15-17 CAGR Samsung 14.6 37.1 65.5 50.9 33.4 27.6 25.0 -13% Apple 8.5 20.8 23.1 34.3 55.7 39.9 45.0 -10% / 25.2 7.9 2.9 2.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 -100% HTC 2.5 7.5 6.3 4.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 0% 5.1 4.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 NM Sony 0.0 0.9 1.5 2.2 0.7 0.2 0.2 -45% BlackBerry 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NM Traditional Tier One's 56.2 78.3 100.2 94.3 92.3 70.4 72.4 -11% YoY Growth 39% 28% -6% -2% -24% 3% Share 62% 37% 29% 22% 21% 16% 16% Huawei 9.9 18.5 32.4 41.3 62.9 71.7 73.1 8% 0.2 6.6 18.4 52.8 64.9 39.7 38.5 -23% Lenovo 3.7 23.5 41.6 47.3 21.8 5.2 6.4 -46% 0.2 3.0 11.5 25.9 35.3 71.9 74.3 VIVO 0.0 2.2 11.6 27.9 35.1 63.3 71.5 0.0 2.2 2.9 5.2 24.4 13.3 12.0 ZTE 10.2 19.4 21.8 20.6 19.4 14.4 14.4 -14% Coolpad 3.9 18.5 37.6 39.4 25.5 13.2 13.7 -27% Top Chinese Brands 28.1 94.0 177.8 260.4 289.3 292.6 303.8 2% YoY Growth 235.1% 89.1% 46.5% 11.1% 1.1% 3.8% Share 31.0% 43.9% 50.7% 62.0% 66.7% 65.4% 65.6% Other brands/whitebox 6.3 41.9 72.6 65.1 52.4 84.2 87.2 29% YoY Growth 561% 73% -10% -20% 61% 4% Share 7% 20% 21% 16% 12% 19% 19% China Smartphones 90.6 214.2 350.6 419.8 434.1 447.2 463.4 3% YoY Growth 136% 64% 20% 3% 3% 4% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

The China brands continue to take market share in the domestic China market. The global brand’s market share has declined from near 40% in 2012 to 16% in 2016 as local brands have established brands on the back of their strategy of offering quality at a reasonable price, undercutting by over half versus Samsung and Apple's high-end flagships. We estimate top Chinese brands are gaining share in the mid to high-end segment (Oppo, Vivo and Huawei) and Whitebox brands are improving in the low to mid-end market to now command over 80% share of the local China market. The key focus for the 2017 outlook though should be a slowdown or modest reversal in that trend if Apple can recapture a bit of share in China with iPhone 8 as it did with the iPhone 6 refresh with larger screen sizes. Growth shifts from China to emerging markets in 2017 China nearing full Figure 18: Emerging markets continue to outpace developed markets and China penetration, growth will 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 16-18 CAGR need to shift to other China 90.6 214.2 350.6 419.8 434.1 447.2 463.4 470.9 3% emerging markets YoY 151% 136% 64% 20% 3% 3% 4% 2% Rest of Asia Pacific 78.8 98.9 149.0 224.8 262.9 278.0 319.1 360.8 14% Latin America 32.0 53.5 97.8 135.6 143.2 140.3 143.7 159.7 7% CEMA 55.3 72.2 105.0 171.3 235.7 236.0 259.6 294.9 12% Other Emerging 166.0 224.6 351.8 531.7 641.7 654.4 722.4 815.4 12% YoY 62% 35% 57% 51% 21% 2% 10% 13% Developed 237.9 286.7 317.1 351.9 361.7 355.8 369.6 395.2 5% YoY 43% 21% 11% 11% 3% -2% 4% 7% Total industry 494.4 725.5 1,019.4 1,303.4 1,437.4 1,457.4 1,555.4 1,681.5 7% YoY 62% 47% 41% 28% 10% 1% 7% 8% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

We still see lower penetration supporting emerging markets growth continuing and maintain a 12% CAGR through 2018, owing to still rising penetration in India, the Middle East, Brazil and Africa. Emerging markets that are key targets for Chinese brands

Asia Semiconductor Sector 8 5 January 2017

exporting handsets should still grow faster, from 654mn in 2016 to 722mn in 2017 and 815mn by 2018. The key short-term risk to monitor though is India where the smartphone market in 2016 is only 130mn units vs. over 500mn in China despite near similar population, but being impacted in the near-term by demonetisation. China brands growing 7-11% including exports Emerging markets still While China smartphone brands growth is now slower in the domestic market, the export can grow at a faster rate channel still has some more penetration ahead. In China, smartphones are already 75% of due to lower 4G and device shipments and reaching a more stable level, keeping the market growth modest at overall smartphone 4% to 463mn units in 2017. On the other hand, the export channel for China brands into penetration other emerging market is still growth with smartphone shipments penetration still only at 64% with 10%+ room for further increase. We estimate the smartphone demand in other emerging market will witness a 12% CAGR from 654mn in 2016 to 815mn in 2018, lifting the combined emerging market unit opportunity growing at 7% CAGR through 2018.

Figure 19: Chinese penetration of devices faster than other emerging markets (in millions, unless otherwise stated) Penetration of devices 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E 16-18 CAGR China handsets 510.5 548.2 563.8 583.9 604.5 619.1 628.3 2% China smartphones 214.2 350.6 419.8 434.1 447.2 463.4 470.9 3% % of devices 42% 64% 74% 74% 74% 75% 75% Emerging mkt handsets 955.8 959.5 986.1 1,025.8 1,030.0 1,099.3 1,121.3 4% Emerging mkt smartphones 225.8 353.8 531.7 641.7 654.4 722.4 815.4 12% % of devices 24% 37% 54% 63% 64% 66% 73% Global handsets 1,907.1 1,944.8 1,983.6 2,046.3 2,074.0 2,158.8 2,194.5 3% Global smartphones 726.7 1,018.7 1,301.7 1,437.4 1,457.4 1,555.4 1,681.5 7% % of devices 38% 52% 66% 70% 70% 72% 77% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Though upside is limited for China brands in the domestic market, they have been shifting more focus to the high-growth emerging markets where demand for smartphone is more on the low to mid-end segment.

Figure 20: Chinese penetration of devices faster than other emerging markets (in millions, unless otherwise stated) Asian built smartphones 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 15-17 CAGR Top Chinese Brands 28.1 94.0 177.8 260.4 289.3 292.6 303.8 2% Smaller Chinese Brands 6.3 41.9 72.6 65.1 52.4 84.2 87.2 29% China shipments (mn units) 34.4 135.9 250.4 325.5 341.7 376.8 391.0 7% YoY Growth 295.2% 84.2% 30.0% 5.0% 10.3% 3.8% Share 39.0% 54.5% 50.5% 42.5% 39.4% 37.2% 36.4% Export shipments (mn units) 53.9 113.5 245.2 440.2 526.6 635.1 683.6 14% YoY Growth 111% 116% 80% 20% 21% 8% Share 61% 46% 49% 57% 61% 63% 64% Asian-built smartphones (mn) 88.3 249.4 495.6 765.7 868.3 1,011.9 1,074.6 11% YoY Growth 183% 99% 55% 13% 17% 6% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

We would note smartphone ASPs in emerging markets are slightly lower, around US$207 and US$125 in India (vs. US$238 for China), a segment which China smartphone brands have advantage over global peers. We would also note 4G penetration is lower in other emerging markets than China at still less than 50% of smartphones shipped now on 4G, keeping the growth from upgrade healthy. We estimate China brands could outgrow the smartphone market slightly at 6% in 2017 and will be able to gain market share modestly in the next few years with spec upgrades, subsidies from China telco operators and rising 4G penetration in tier-2 and 3 domestic cities and other emerging markets.

Asia Semiconductor Sector 9 5 January 2017

Figure 21: 4G penetration still lower in other EMs Figure 22: ASPs in other EMs lower than China Emerging market 4G penetration (%) Smartphone ASPs (US$) 100% 450 90% 400 80% 350 70% 300 60% 250 50% 40% 200 30% 150 20% 100 10% 50

0% 0

3Q13 2Q16 1Q13 2Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16

1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16

CEMA Latin America CEMA Latin America Rest of Asia/Pacific India Rest of Asia/Pacific India Emerging market excluding China China Emerging market excluding China Series6 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Source: Company data, Credit Suisse

China brand forecasts for We estimate the top China brands still have room for some share gains as they 2017 again led by consolidate share from whitebox and gain in export channels. We estimate the brands up Huawei, Oppo and Vivo 7% in 2017 and 11% 2018, with Huawei, Vivo, Oppo, Gionee and Tenco outperforming. The key factor in the assumption is the ability for Huawei, Oppo and Vivo to maintain their strong momentum. In 2016, these three vendors drove all of the +17% shipments growth of the entire China brand shipments from 778mn to 912mn. In 2017, Huawei is projecting to its suppliers 180-200mn (vs. our in-print 170mn), Oppo 140-150mn (vs. our 135mn) and Oppo also 130-140mn (vs. our in-print 130mn), accounting for more than 100% of the China brand shipments growth. Traditionally leadership has changed, with past leaders in China Xiaomi and Lenovo falling and which would trigger an inventory correction for components suppliers if another shift or slowdown dampens the leaders’ momentum.

Figure 23: China smartphone brands shipments—unit growth moderates China brand units (mn) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E 15-18 CAGR Huawei 15.6 27.2 52.0 77.0 107.0 140.0 170.0 185.0 20% Oppo 0.1 3.1 11.0 30.0 40.0 95.0 135.0 160.0 59% Xiaomi 0.4 7.2 18.7 61.1 72.5 52.0 55.0 60.0 -6% Vivo 0.0 2.5 11.2 30.0 36.0 75.0 130.0 145.0 59% ZTE 10.5 26.8 40.0 48.0 50.0 45.0 48.0 50.0 0% Lenovo 3.7 23.7 45.5 59.4 43.5 30.0 32.0 34.0 -8% Lenovo's Moto 21.0 22.5 24.0 NM TCL/Alcatel 0.3 6.5 17.5 39.6 40.8 33.0 35.0 37.0 -3% Coolpad 3.9 16.1 35.0 43.5 28.7 18.0 19.5 21.0 -10% Meizu 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.2 24.8 17.5 20.0 23.0 -2% Gionee 0.0 6.8 11.4 16.0 12.8 30.0 34.0 37.0 42% Tecno - 1.0 2.0 4.0 7.5 11.0 13.0 15.0 26% Hisense 0.3 3.4 8.3 11.7 6.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 -13% Tianyu / K-Touch 0.4 7.4 13.3 11.2 4.3 2.3 1.5 1.0 -39% Bird 0.0 0.3 2.1 2.5 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.8 -13% G-Five 0.0 0.0 2.0 5.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 -26% Others 51.5 103.3 193.1 278.9 302.0 336.2 259.0 293.0 -1% China brand units (mn) 87.9 237.2 466.1 723.1 777.6 911.9 979.5 1,090.0 12% Growth (YoY) 170% 96% 55% 8% 17% 7% 11% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Asia Semiconductor Sector 10 5 January 2017

Content and spec upgrades offer some room for optimism in a slow growth market Content drivers in Despite slowing smartphone unit growth, the leaders in the supply chain should continue smartphones should stay to benefit from the continued innovation in handsets through spec upgrades. We highlight on dual camera, the specs which will be more widely adopted into mainstream smartphones below. fingerprint, OLED displays, memory, USB ■ Fingerprint penetration continues its fast expansion. We estimate the penetration Type-C, CAT 7 advanced for smartphone with fingerprint sensors will increase to 40% in 2016E to 600mn units. modems and VR For the non-Apple smartphone devices, we estimate its fingerprint penetration was only 16% in 2015 but has increased to 30% in 2016 to 500mn+ units, thanks to the push by Samsung and Chinese brands. We estimate the fingerprint sensor adoption rate for non-Apple will further increase to 54% in 2017 (722mn) and 65% in 2018 (931mn).

Figure 24: Global smartphone fingerprint Figure 25: Non-Apple smartphone fingerprint penetration to reach 70% by 2018E penetration to reach 65% by 2018E

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

■ OLED continues its growth but likely supply constrained. Our Korea team forecasts base case of 21%/26% OLED penetration in global smartphones market mainly driven by Samsung and Apple. Our China tech component team also sees 20% of top 20 models in China feature with OLED panels and estimates 27/50mn OLED smartphone shipments from China OEMs in 2017/18. However, we expect the supply of OLED panel will remain tight through 2017 due to 90%+ OLED which is mainly for Apple and internal.

Figure 26: OLED penetration in global smartphones Figure 27: OLED on the rise in China smartphones

(mn unit) 100% 1,800 35% 90% 1,750 30% 80% 1,700 25% 70% 1,650 60% 1,600 20% 50% 1,550 15% 40% 1,500 10% 30% 1,450 20% 5% 1,400 10% 1,350 0% 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 0% 11/27/2015 1/15/2016 4/19/2016 6/24/2016 8/5/2016 11/4/2016

Total units (lhs) OLED penetration rate TFT AMOLED LTPS Retina

Source: Credit Suisse estimates Source: JD, Tmall, Credit Suisse

Asia Semiconductor Sector 11 5 January 2017

■ Dual camera penetration still rising. Our tech component team expects some upsides to CS 2017 penetration rate assumption of 10-15%, vs. 20%+ according to Android handset camera module vendors. We also see a trend for three cameras (dual-cam plus a single cam) to become the default setting for some Android phones in the next few years, and expect to see four-camera models (both front and back are dual-cams) in the China market in 2017. Several whitebox also at the China electronics shows are now sampling dual cam models. With the fast adoption of high-end specs such as 13MP+, OIS, and dual-cam, the complexity of manufacture increased a lot for supply chain, leading to lower yield and tight supply. CS analyst Sam Li still expects Sunny Optical to achieve 20%+ lens shipment growth in 2017.

Figure 29: Dual-cam lens to help Sunny shipments Figure 28: Dual camera model launches continue grow 20%+ in 2017E Vendor Model Launch time HTC One M8 2014-Mar 2016-Apr Huawei V8 2016-May Coolpad Cool 1 dual 2016-Aug 360 Q5 2016-Aug Apple iPhone 7 2016-Sep Xiaomi Mi 5S/5S Plus 2016-Sep ZTE Axon 7 Max 2016-Oct 2016-Nov Vivo XPlay6 2016-Nov

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

■ LTE shifts toward CAT 7+ speeds, lifting RF suppliers. China Mobile has been shifting the smartphone subsidies from low-end smartphones to smartphones above Rmb2,000 supporting CAT 7+ and carrier aggregation which enables faster data transmission and should move that down to lower price points, with Mediatek and Qualcomm both moving that baseband feature into the mainstream through 2017. We believe it will require more frequency bands being supported by smartphone, lifting the demand for RF filter and PA requirements. RF suppliers should benefit from growing adoption of CAT 7+ and higher RF content for complex frequency, taking revenue for a 12% CAGR in mobile applications over 2015-17.

Figure 30: 60% CAGR in CA-capable LTE cellular Figure 31: 52% of the LTE mobile device shipments device shipments in 2015-17 will be CA-capable in 2017 2,000 100% 1,800 90% 17% 34% 1,600 80% 45% 52% 1,400 70% 1,200 885 60% 1,000 600 50% 100%

mnunits 800 346 40% 83% 66% 600 30% 55% 48% 400 814 20% 669 740 517 200 345 10% 0 0% 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E

Non-CA LTE devices CA-enabled LTE devices Non-CA LTE devices CA-enabled LTE devices

Source: Navian, Credit Suisse Source: Navian, Credit Suisse

Asia Semiconductor Sector 12 5 January 2017

■ Memory specs still accelerating in Chinese smartphones. NAND supply remains tight due to the rising capacities in smartphones on rising proliferation of higher definition video footage and now adoption of dual camera plus competition from the higher densities in Apple's iPhone 7. We believe the actual capacity will catch up when smartphone production corrects in 1Q17 although NAND demand from Chinese smartphone makers should not decline as much as volumes even in 1Q2017 and the continued tight supply should keep NAND pricing firm.

Figure 32: Global smartphone NAND capacity Figure 33: China smartphone NAND also shifting to increasing on Apple's iPhone 7 close to 30GB

Global smartphone mix Average global smartphone NAND capacity (GB) China smartphone mix Average China smartphone NAND capacity (GB) 100% 30.0 100% 30.0 25.0 80% 25.0 80% 20.0 20.0 60% 60% 15.0 15.0 40% 40% 10.0 10.0 20% 20% 5.0 5.0 0% 0.0

0% 0.0

1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16

2Q12 1Q15 1Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 32/64/128/256/512MB 1GB 32/64/128/256/512MB 1GB 4GB 8GB 4GB 8GB 16GB 32GB 16GB 32GB 64GB 128GB 64GB 128GB Average NAND capacity (GB) Average NAND capacity (GB) Source: Credit Suisse estimates Source: JD, Tmall, Credit Suisse

■ USB Type C adoption starts to emerge. High-end smartphones have been gradually adopting USB Type-C as the port is half width and one-third the height vs. standard USB connector, allowing even smaller form factor. In addition, USB Type-C allows faster data transmission and power supply compared with standard USB connector. We estimate the smartphone shipments supported USB Type-C has increased from 7.5mn units in 1Q16 to 14.0mn 2Q16, representing 4% of penetration. China smartphone markers (e.g., Huawei, Xiaomi, Gionee, and LeEco) have been adopting the function in high-end smartphones. Samsung also has started to use the connector in its Galaxy Note 7 though the shipments is limited due to battery issue.

■ VR still niche but seeing standardisation with Google's Project Day Dream. Many China brands and whitebox vendors are also working on virtual reality where penetration is low but currently offers a land rush of hardware and content solutions looking to grab early mind share and volumes. Google's VR platform Daydream has potential to create a wide ecosystem for the mass market using a high-end smartphone at US$300+ as the main engine for the graphics and multimedia, substantially lowering the entry price. The vendor is mandating OLED Display for VR capable phones and high-end processor, noting the Snapdragon 800 series is the first Daydream ready processor. We expect that increasing requirements for supporting VR could potentially drive upgrade cycles on the SoC for next several years.

Asia Semiconductor Sector 13 5 January 2017

Competitive pressure persists in mobile processors The mobile processor space has largely consolidated around merchant suppliers Mediatek, Qualcomm and Spreadtrum along with in-house solutions from Samsung, Huawei and Apple (still outsources baseband), with Xiaomi also investing in Leadcore. Despite the consolidation on the merchant side, the market remains a competitive challenge with Qualcomm still controlling the high-end merchant market but aggressively battling Mediatek in the entry to mainstream, with Spreadtrum still a factor in the 3G market.

Figure 34: Qualcomm taking a modest lead, with a recent lift from China Mobile's CAT 7 requirement Spreadtrum Mediatek Qualcomm SC9830/9832 Helio P10 / P20 Helio X10 Helio X20 Helio X25 / X30 Snapdragon 61x / 625 Snapdragon 65x Snapdragon 808 Snapdragon 810 Snapdragon 820 / 835 Infocus Bingo 21 Archos Diamond 2+ Creo Mark 1 360 N4 Elephone P9000 Zenfone Max Asus Zenfone 3 Acer Jade 2 Gigaset ME pro Asus ZenFone 3 Intex Cloud String Elephone M3 Elephone Vowney Alcatel Flash 3 LeEco L2 HTC One A9 Asus Zen Pad Z8 Acer Jade Primo HTC Butterfly 3 HP Elite x3 Lephone W7 Gionee S6 Pro Gionee E8 Elephone P 9000 LeEco Le 2S Coolpad Cool1 Blackberry Vienna Huawei HTC M10 Lephone W9 Gionee S8 HTC One E9+ InFocus M888 Meizu M3 Lenovo Lemon 3 NuAns NEO Lenovo Vibe X3 LeTV 1S Pro HTC Nexus Micromax Canvas Mega 2 Gionee W909 HTC One M9+ LeEco Le2 Meizu Pro 6 Lenovo Phab Plus Oppo R9 Plus LG Angler LeEco Cool 1 Lenovo Zuk Z2 Micromax Unite 4 Pro Imoo M1000 HTC One ME Meizu MX6 Vernee Apollo Lenovo Vibo K5/Plus X LG G4 Microsoft Lumia 950 XL LeTV Le Max Pro Philips S326 InFocus S1 HTC One X9 QIKU N4 Micromax YU Yureka Gionee Elife S6 LG Motorola 2 LG G Flex 3 Rockcel Quartzo LEAGOO Elite 1 Letv 1S Smartcong Flagship Xiaomi Pro Jide Remix Pro LG V10 Motorola LG G5 J2 Lenovo K5 Note Lumigon T3 Vernee Apollo Lite Meizu Pro 7 LeEco Le 2 Microsoft Lumix 950 OnePlus Two LG V20 Samsung Z2 LG X Power with Sprint Meitu V4 Xiaomi Redmi 4 Sony Xperia XZ Motorola Active Moto X 2016 Xolo Era 1X Meitu M6 Meizu MX5 ZOPO Speed 8 Max Nextbit Ember Robin Sharp AQUOS ZETA Nexus 6P Meizu MX6 Sharp Aquos Z2 Sony Xperia M4 Vivo X7 Qiku Flagship One Plus 3 Meizu Blue Charm 2 Plus TCL IDOL 4/4S Vodafone Plat 7 Samsung Galaxy N5 edge Vivo Xshot 3s Oppo Find 9 Motorola X 2016 PPTV PP King 7s Vivo X6SPlus Xiaomi Mi Max Sony Xperia W+ Xiaomi Note Oppo R9 Asus Zen Fone 3 Xiaomi 4C ZTE Axon Perf. Sony Xperia C6 Sony Xperia Z4 Compact Huawei Nova Plus ZTE nubia Z9 Vivo Xplay 5 TCL 750 Xiaomi Redmi Note2 Huawei G9 Plus Xiaomi mi5 Umi Super Model Xiaomi Redmi Note3 ZTE Nubia Z11 Yu Yunicorn ZTE Nubia NX541 Xiaomi Mi 6 Meizu Note 6

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse

Mediatek's market share MediaTek did well through most of 2016 in China and emerging markets up to the mid- now around 49%, though high-end with Helio, but has not cracked the flagship portion of the market. Our tracker of slipping slightly in late design wins the past couple quarters shows Qualcomm edging MediaTek 84 to 60, though 2016 the difference is largely from the 17 design wins secured by Qualcomm’s flagship Snapdragon 820/821 processor. Qualcomm prices this product over US$50, well above MediaTek’s top-end US$25-30 pricing and commands a number of premium brands with this series (Samsung, LG, Motorola, LG, Sony, Vivo, Xiaomi, ZTE, Lenovo, LeTV, Asus).

Figure 35: Chipsets by vendor—Mediatek shareholding relatively stable Chipsets to China brands 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 2018E 15-18 CAGR Mediatek 223.2 356.4 395.4 500.1 530.1 546.5 11% Mediatek share (%) 45% 47% 46% 49% 49% 49% Spreadtrum 120.6 160.0 200.0 220.0 230.0 245.0 7% Leadcore 12.0 16.0 15.0 13.0 11.0 11.0 -10% Hi-Silicon 2.6 15.4 48.2 70.0 85.0 92.5 24% Asian suppliers 358.4 547.8 658.5 803.1 856.1 895.0 11% YoY Growth 144% 53% 20% 22% 7% 5% Share 72% 72% 76% 79% 80% 80% Qualcomm 116.7 187.9 184.8 203.8 218.5 230.3 8% Intel 0.0 0.0 10.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 NM Broadcom 7.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NM Marvell 13.0 25.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NM ST-Ericsson 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NM Overseas suppliers 137.2 217.9 209.8 208.8 218.5 230.3 3% YoY Growth 34% 59% -4% 0% 5% 5% Share 28% 28% 24% 21% 20% 20% Chipset incl MTK/SPRD tier-1 495.6 765.7 868.3 1,011.9 1,074.6 1,125.3 9% YoY Growth 99% 55% 13% 17% 6% 5% Mediatek tier-one's 4.5 14.3 31.6 35.0 65.0 75.0 33% Spreadtrum tier-one's (Samsung) 25.0 28.3 59.0 65.0 30.0 20.0 -30% Chipset total to China brands 466.1 723.1 777.6 911.9 979.5 1,030.3 10% YoY Growth 96% 55% 8% 17% 7% 5% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Asia Semiconductor Sector 14 5 January 2017

Mediatek's gains into Samsung to offset modest China share loss We estimate Mediatek’s share in the China built smartphone market increased from 45% to 49% from 2013 through 2016 with a good push into the mainstream LTE market, although is now getting capped from further gains and even slightly reversing through late 2016. The company lost some share late in 2016 into early 2017 in China's upper tiers of the market to Qualcomm due to lack of CAT 7 modem and a slight leg on qualification of super-regional models which Qualcomm is pushing with its global pass program. Mediatek's customer mix has been split between Tier one Chinese (~50% of shipments), Smaller Tier 2 brands (40% of shipments) and a gradually increasing mix of Tier One's. The company's China business lately has been a victim of vendor shifts in the market, with Mediatek having less than 30% of Huawei and Vivo's volume and could fall under 50% of Oppo's volume but higher share at now slower growing customers including Lenovo, Xiaomi, Meizu, TCL, ZTE and Coolpad. To offset these losses, Mediatek is at least finally shipping to Samsung's entry level J-series models which could help it track the industry's +5-10% shipment growth to maintain overall share.

Figure 36: Mediatek's customer base still led by the Chinese customers 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E 2017E 15-17 CAGR 2016 % of sales Sony 0.0 1.0 1.9 6.0 9.0 9.9 10.4 7% 2.0% LG 0.2 0.8 1.9 5.9 8.0 8.8 9.2 7% 1.8% HTC 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 6.0 7.4 6.7 6% 1.5% Samsung 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 30.0 NM 0.3% Motorola 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 6.5 7.8 128% 1.3% Others 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.8 2% 0.2% International brands 0.4 2.2 4.5 14.3 25.3 35.0 65.0 60% 7.0% YoY growth 447% 103% 219% 78% 38% 86% International brands 4% 2% 2% 4% 6% 7% 12% Huawei 1.6 9.5 15.6 27.0 32.1 42.0 34.0 3% 8.4% Oppo 0.0 2.3 7.7 21.0 28.0 61.8 60.8 47% 12.3% Vivo 0.0 1.0 4.5 12.0 14.4 33.8 39.0 65% 6.7% Lenovo 2.6 21.3 31.9 41.6 30.5 24.0 25.6 -8% 4.8% Xiaomi 0.0 0.0 2.8 18.3 29.0 33.8 33.0 7% 6.8% Meizu 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.2 21.1 15.8 18.0 -8% 3.1% TCL/Alcatel 0.0 2.3 8.8 27.7 24.5 23.1 21.0 -7% 4.6% ZTE 1.1 8.0 16.0 21.6 20.0 18.0 19.2 -2% 3.6% Coolpad 0.8 4.8 10.5 13.1 10.0 6.3 6.8 -18% 1.3% Chinese Tier One 7.1 51.3 100.7 187.4 209.6 258.5 257.4 11% 51.7% YoY growth 623% 96% 86% 12% 23% 0% Chinese Tier One 71% 47% 45% 53% 53% 52% 49% Asustek 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 3.0 9.7 11.6 95% 1.9% Micromax 0.0 1.2 5.6 10.8 12.1 10.6 12.7 3% 2.1% Gionee 0.0 4.7 8.0 11.2 10.2 25.5 27.2 63% 5.1% Hisense 0.2 2.5 5.8 8.2 4.2 4.0 3.2 -13% 0.8% Tecno 0.0 0.7 1.4 2.8 5.6 8.8 10.4 36% 1.8% Tianyu / K-Touch 0.3 5.6 9.3 7.8 3.4 1.8 1.2 -41% 0.4% Karbonn 0.0 0.5 3.3 3.3 2.1 0.6 0.6 -44% 0.1% Spice 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.1 1.3 0.2 0.2 -64% 0.0% Others 1.9 41.0 84.2 108.7 118.6 145.5 140.5 9% 29.1% Tier Two 2.5 56.3 118.1 154.7 160.5 206.6 207.7 14% 41.3% YoY growth 2121% 110% 31% 4% 29% 0% Chinese Tier Two 25% 51% 53% 43% 41% 41% 39% Total 10.0 109.8 223.2 356.4 395.4 500.1 530.1 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Mediatek's roadmap could maintain its position through the year Mediatek's roadmap Mediatek has not quite closed the gap with its high-end products to Qualcomm with its should sustain its Helio family. The lack of CAT 7 modem and its supply constraints through mid-2016 have position with new cost it some market share in 4Q16 into early 1Q17. We do believe the roadmap can stem products that can ramp further share loss by 2H17, however as Mediatek will introduce Helio X30 (10nm) and P25 up by 2H17 (16nm) in late 1Q17 and follow with 2H17 upgrades with CAT 12 for the Helio and CAT 7 for the mainstream at better cost structure. Better modem share and incremental Samsung should keep the company in-line to market growth and offset moderating China shipments and exposure to some of the mid-tier vendors in China not performing as well. M&A by its top competitor lowers its mobile exposure from 90% to 60%, also slightly lowering competitive intensity in smartphones.

Asia Semiconductor Sector 15 5 January 2017

Figure 37: Helio shipment grows modestly in 2017 Figure 38: Helio lifting blended ASPs mildly Revenue (NT$bn) Helio % of Mediatek sales Smartphone shipment (mn units) Smartphone ASP (US$) $50 40% 90.0 $30 $45 35% 80.0 $27 $40 70.0 $24 30% $35 60.0 $21 $18 $30 25% 50.0 $15 40.0 $25 20% $12 30.0 $20 15% $9 $15 20.0 $6 10% 10.0 $10 $3 0.0 $0 $5 5% 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16E 1Q17E 2Q17E 3Q17E 4Q17E $0 0% 3G units 4G Mainstream units 4G Helio units 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16E 1Q17E 2Q17E 3Q17E 4Q17E Blended SP ASP 4G Helio ASP 4G Mainstream ASP 3G 4G Mainstream 4G Helio 4G Helio 3G ASP Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Mediatek management acknowledges its Helio refresh in 2Q17 will not likely yet improve margins although hopes better cost structure can start to improve margins in 2H17. We have remained more conservative in our model due to uncertain price reaction from its competitors and also similar refreshes coming from Qualcomm from top to bottom for its product family.

Figure 39: Mediatek smartphone roadmap 2015 2016 2017 1H 2H 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

X20 X25 X

- X30 X10 MT6797 MT6797T MT6795 LTE Cat 10 Deca, Dual A72 + Octa (1H17) Deca, Dual A72 + A53, 64bit big.LITTLE, 64-bit Octa, 2.2GHz, Helio Octa A53, 64bit 20nm, 25MP, H.265 28nm HPM, Cat4 Decacore, 64bit big.LITTLE, 4K2K 30fps video, LTE big.LITTLE, 10nm, 20nm, Cat-6, R11 Cat-6, 2x20 40MP, H.265 4K2K CA+C2K SRLTE 30fps video Octa, 1.3- P10 10nm, Deca cores, 4G 1.5GHz, 8 A53, MT6755 up to A73, 2.2 GHz 64 bit, 28nm Next P1 LP, Cat4+ Octa A53, 28nm P20 LP, 2.0 GHz, 21MP, MT6753 1080p30 video FHD Octa A53, 64bit, P25 Next P2 LTE + C2K SoC (1920x1080), LTE MT6750/T Cat6, big.LITTLE, Mainstream Mainstream R11 Cat6 2x20 CA 16nm 16nm, Octa core, + C2K SRLTE Octa A53, 28nm HPM, 1.5 GHz, 16nm, Octa A53, 16MP, HD Display, LTE Cat6 24MP, Dual A53 MT6735 2xCA + C2K SRLTE camera, Cat 6 LTE + C2K SoC MT6738 Quad A53, 1.3GHz, 13MP, 28nm Octa A53, 1.5 GHz, 28nm, LP, 64 bit, FHD (1920x1080), LTE 13MP, HD Display, LTE Cat6 R9 Cat4/HSPA+ (42/11)/TD, CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A MT6737 MT675x

Entry Entry 4G MT6735P/M Quad A53, 1.3 -1.5 GHz, LTE + C2K SoC 28nm, 13MP, HD Display, Under planning LTE Cat6 2xCA + C2K Quad A53, 1.0GHz, HD (P) / qHD SRLTE (M), 8MP, qHD, 28nm LP, 64 bit, LTE R9 Cat4+ CDMA2000 Quad A7, 1.3GHz, MT6580 HD720, HSPA+ (21/5.76)/EDGE MT673x MT6570 Under planning

Dual A7, 1.3GHz, qHD, Entry Entry 3G HSPA+ (21/5.76)/EDGESource: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse Qualcomm's high-end and mass market innovation keeps the pressure on Mediatek Qualcomm's refresh and Qualcomm targets to maintain its high-end lead for Snapdragon 800 and match up solutions for super- competitively with MediaTek on the mid-tier Snapdragon 400 and 600 platforms. We regional and global believe the company is planning MSM8997/MSM8998 in early 2017 using Samsung’s models should keep 10nm process and using at CAT 12/CAT 16 modems to stay ahead of MediaTek shifting to competitive pressure CAT 10 in 1H17. high

Asia Semiconductor Sector 16 5 January 2017

In the Snapdragon 600 tier, Qualcomm is moving back from 14nm to 28nm HPM, likely motivated by cost and availability of multiple sources including Samsung and TSMC. The product would be optimised for emerging markets mid-high-end and with CAT 7 modem still meeting China Mobile’s target for that modem standard in its Rmb2,000+ smartphones. In the Snapdragon 400 tier, Qualcomm would also offer a CAT 7 modem with its MSM8940 built on a low-cost 28nm LP process capable of multi-sourcing across Samsung, TSMC, UMC, GlobalFoundries and SMIC. This product would be positioned against MediaTek’s older MT6753 chipset (mainstream octa-core). For the low-end of the market, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 200 series 8908/8909 would offer a quad core option against MediaTek’s MT6735/MT6737. Qualcomm also has improved tools for its reference design including Global Pass to speed time to market gap and a comprehensive online database of qualified suppliers.

Figure 40: Qualcomm smartphone roadmap advancing in 2H16 and 1H17 2015 2016 2017 1H 2H 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 64-bit, X16 8994/ S810 8976/ S620 8996/ S820 LTE CA 450Mbps, 8998 10FF modem, Kryo, 20nm SoC 28nm HPM 14FF Hydra 64 bit Cat 16, 4k 60fps LTE CA X10 Cat 9, Octa, 4 A72 + 4 A53, 64-bit, X12

S800 TD, 64-bit big.LITTLE, 1.4 GHz, LTE modem, 8997

CA, 4K, X8 CAT 7 Cat 12, Kryo, 10FF Premium Premium 8992/ S808 QHD 2.5K 20nm SoC 8976 Pro LTE CA X10 Cat 28nm HPM 9, TD, 64-bit X9 LTE modem, Cat 7, S618 8956/ QHD, 4A72 + 4 A53 28nm HPM 8953/ S625 Octa, 8 A53,, 64-bit, 8952/ S617 14nm FF X9 Cat 7, CA, FHD 28nm LP Hexa, 2 A72 + 4

A53, X8 CAT 7, CA, Mainstream 1.2 GHz, 4K

Qualcomm S600 Qualcomm Octa, 8 A53, 1.5 GHz, X8 Cat 7, CA, FHD

8929/ S425 8937 / S430 28nm LP 28nm LP S4xxx / 8940 Octa A53, 1.4 GHz, 64- Octa, 8 A53, 1.7 GHz, 28nm LP S4xxx / 8920 X9 LTE modem, Cat 7, bit, Cat 4, FHD 64-bit, X6 modem Cat 28nm LP FHD, 4 A53 + 4 A53 4, FHD X9 LTE modem, Cat 7,

FHD, 4 A53 + 4 A53 Entry Entry S400 S412 / 8917 28nm LP

Quad, 4 A53, 1.4 GHz, 64-bit, X6 Cat 4, FHD Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

8909/ S215 LTE CA Cat4, TD, 28nm LP Quad A7 1.1 GHz

8908/ S210 TD-SCDMA

Low 28nm LP S200 Dual A7 1.1 GHz

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Spreadtrum continues to take share and keep 3G competitive, although 4G is not yet a meaningful rival Spreadtrum launched its Spreadtrum’s major traction has been with WCDMA the past couple years in the entry higher-end LTE solution level channels with its quad core WCDMA SC7731 built on TSMC’s 28nm. Most whitebox at MWC but is not yet suppliers offer the Spreadtrum solution as a stable offering at US$1-2 cheaper than shipping in meaningful comparable MediaTek solutions. For 4G, however, Spreadtrum has only had modest volume traction. The company has been shipping its SC9832 4G quad core entry level solution into a handful of China and India brands (Intex, Lava, InFocus, LePhone) at US$50-100 retail prices but most smartphone vendors do not yet feel comfortable designing in the chipset beyond their entry level 4G tablets.

Asia Semiconductor Sector 17 5 January 2017

Figure 41: Spreadtrum launching a 16nm TSMC chip in 2H16, Planning an Intel based chip in 1H17 Spreadtrum Spreadtrum Spreadtrum Spreadtrum Spreadtrum Spreadtrum Spreadtrum Chipset SC9620 2-chip Shark SC8831G SC7731G SC9832 SC9860 SC98xx Technology 40nm SMIC 40nm SMIC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 16nm TSMC 14nm Intel Multi-core Quad Quad Quad Quad Quad Octa Octa CPU Modem Only A7 A7 A7 A7 A53 x86 Network 4G 4G 4G 3G 4G 4G 4G Frequency 1.0GHz 1.2GHz 1.4GHz 1.5GHz 1.5GHz >2.0GHz >2.0GHz GPU Mali-400 Mali-400 Mali-400 Mali-400 MP2 Mali-400 Mali-T880 TBD Sampling 3Q14 1Q14 3Q14 1Q15 4Q15 3Q16 1Q17 Ramp 4Q14 2Q15 1Q15 2Q15 2Q16 4Q16 2Q17 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse

Spreadtrum had announced plans back in Mobile World Congress for a 4G upgrade with its SC9860 Whale 2 octa-core 4G platform. The chip on paper looked like a formidable rival to Mediatek's Helio series, sporting an 8 core ARM A53 architecture clocked over 2.0GHz and manufactured on TSMC’s 16nm. Despite an announcement in 1Q16 that the chip was in mass production and would ship in models in 2Q16, we have not yet seen the chip in the market. We also believe Spreadtrum is planning a 14nm chip at Intel in 1H17 after its SC9860, shifting from TSMC as part of the equity stake Intel took in Tsinghua Unigroup. Intel has cancelled its internal SoFIA project but would still see some potential if this chip sees better commercial success. Spreadtrum management had been targeting to grow their baseband shipment from 530 mn in 2015 (about 230 mn smartphones) to 600 mn units in 2016 with 120 mn for LTE smartphones. With the market shifting to 4G faster, we believe the company fell short and may have only shipped 30 mn units. The company may end up closer to 220 mn smartphones, slightly below the market growth although could still have more market impact in 2017 if its new LTE chips can finally ramp into high volume production. Captive chipsets also carving out some market share Samsung and HiSilicon The improving competitiveness of captive chipsets from Huawei and Samsung has also have improved their taken a piece of business from the merchant market. Samsung integrated its modem and competitiveness to take processor into a high-end Exynos that now splits flagship sockets with Qualcomm and is some share at their rolling out into the mid-tier of Samsung's product line. Long term, Samsung is looking to parent companies get to 50% internal sourcing of its Exynos chipset, with Qualcomm and Mediatek or Spreadtrum splitting the rest. For 2017 models, Mediatek has taken some of the low-end J-series previously designed by Spreadtrum due to its more mature 4G solution.

Figure 42: Captive chipsets improving in performance and integration HiSilicon HiSilicon HiSilicon HiSilicon HiSilicon HiSilicon Samsung Samsung Samsung Leadcore LTE chipsets Kirin 930 Kirin 935 Kirin 940 Kirin 950 Kirin 960 Kirin 970 Exynos 7420 Exynos 7580 Exynos 8890 LC1860 Technology 28nm HPC 28nm HPC 16nm 16nm 16nm 10nm 14nm LPE 28nm 14nm LPP 28nm Multi-core Octa core Octa core Octa core Octa core Octa core Octa core Octa core Octa core Octa core Hexa core 4 Cortex A53 + 4 Cortex A53 + 4 Cortex A53 + 4 Cortex A53 + 4 Cortex A53 + Mongoose + CPU 8 Cortex A53 8 Cortex A53 8 Cortex A53 6 Cortex A7 4 Cortex A72 4 Cortex A72 4 Cortex A73 4 Cortex A73 4 Cortex A57 A53 TD/FDD-LTE TD/FDD-LTE TD/FDD-LTE TD/FDD-LTE TD/FDD-LTE TD/FDD-LTE TD/FDD-LTE TD/FDD-LTE TD/FDD-LTE Network 2-chip LTE W/TD-SCDMA W/TD-SCDMA W/TD-SCDMA W/TD-SCDMA W/TD-SCDMA W/TD-SCDMA W/TD-SCDMA W/TD-SCDMA W/TD-SCDMA

Modem CAT 6 CAT 6 CAT 6 CAT 6 CAT 12 CAT 12

Frequency 1.8GHz 1.8GHz 2.2GHz 2.4GHz 2.4GHz 2.8GHz 2.1GHz 1.6GHz 2.3GHz 2GHz GPU Mali T628 Mali T628 Mali T860 Mali T880 Mali G71 Mali G71 Mali T760 Mali T720 Mali T880 Mali T628 Ramp 2Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 4Q16 1Q17 2Q15 2Q15 1Q16 2Q15 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse

Competition from merchant solutions is also rising in the China brands with Huawei now giving over half of its allocation to HiSilicon on its mid-high-end 4G smartphones. HiSilicon is competitive with CAT 10 modem and octa-core processor built on TSMC's new 16nm FinFet process so capable of meeting specifications for Huawei's flagship smartphones.

Asia Semiconductor Sector 18 5 January 2017

We also believe Leadcore, invested by Xiaomi, is also growing more capable with its offerings. The company has been shipping in an entry-level quad core processor into Xiaomi smartphones but plans a move to 14nm FinFet for a high-end LTE-Advanced chipset in 2017. Staying conservative on Mediatek, trends staying soft near term We expect Mediatek to lose share and struggle early in the year but has prospects for a turnaround with new products by 2Q17 through 2H17. The company is still lagging on the modem through 1Q17 and facing slowdown from some of its struggling China customers (Xiaomi, Meizu, LeEco, TCL, Coolpad) and impact from the pause in India demand following its demonetisation shift in 4Q. We do see some prospects for improvement with new CAT 10 Helio X30 chipset and Helio P35 in late 1Q17 and new cost down chips for the entry tier in 2H17. The company is also shipping its mid-end chips to Samsung’s J/A series, adding 4% unit growth in 2017 and offsetting the ASPs decline on competition.

Figure 43: Mediatek 4Q16-1Q17 and 2016-2018 estimates CS vs. Street 4Q16 1Q17 2016 2017 2018 (NT$ mn) CS CS(old) Street Guidance CS CS(old) Street CS CS(old) Street CS CS(old) Street CS CS(old) Street Sales $68,807 $70,351 $69,911 NT$66.6-72.9bn $60,607 $69,572 $63,576 $275,643 $277,187 $276,864 $300,832 $307,327 $297,404 $320,701 $320,981 $303,325 Chg -12.2% -10.3% -10.8% -7.0%-15.1% QoQ -11.9% -1.1% -9.1% 29.3% 30.0% 29.8% 9.1% 10.9% 7.4% 6.6% 4.4% 9.6% GM% 34.9% 35.1% 35.0% 33.5-36.5% 35.1% 35.0% 34.7% 35.7% 35.8% 35.7% 35.0% 35.0% 35.3% 35.1% 35.3% 36.2% OpM% 6.1% 6.1% 6.6% 4-11% 3.4% 6.6% 6.6% 8.5% 8.4% 8.7% 8.4% 8.4% 9.0% 8.8% 8.7% 9.7% Net Inc. 4,416 4,412 6,163 FX: 31.5 2,600 4,697 5,549 22,668 22,664 24,760 25,010 25,013 28,430 27,358 26,573 29,057 EPS (NT$) $2.83 $2.82 $3.90 $1.66 $3.00 $3.43 $14.50 $14.50 $15.68 $16.00 $16.00 $17.95 $17.50 $17.00 $18.29 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse 4Q16 now at the lower-half of guidance, 1Q17 should see a seasonal decline, with some incremental impact from India demonetization Mediatek may come in at We believe Mediatek only achieved the lower-end of guidance for 4Q16 and trim our sales the lower half of estimate from -10% QoQ to -12% QoQ versus -7-15% QoQ guidance due to slower sales guidance and guide a from India and a late year slowdown in China. We also expect Mediatek to see a sales soft 1Q17 decline in 1Q17 that could rival traditional seasonality down 10-15% QoQ and now cut our 1Q17 estimate from -1% to -12% QoQ off a lower 4Q base. The company will be impacted by some short-term market share loss to Qualcomm due to its lag on the high-end modem and also an impact from the slowdown in India following the currency demonetisation, which has prompted the Indian Cellular Association to report a short-term 50% drop in sales. We estimate India annual smartphone shipments at 120mn units and Mediatek about 50% market share, contributing ~60mn annualised units or about 12% of its smartphone shipment run rate and 10% of smartphone revenue.

Figure 44: Mediatek operating assumptions

NT$mn unless noted 2013 2014 2015 2016F Prior 2017F Prior 2018F 2019F 3G Smartphones (mn) 223.2 324.5 236.8 168.2 172.2 139.8 153.9 127.2 107.0 4G Smartphones (mn) 0.0 31.8 158.6 331.9 336.0 390.3 433.0 419.3 459.2 Smartphones (mn) 223.2 356.4 395.4 500.1 508.3 530.1 586.9 546.5 566.2 Tablets (mn) 21.9 41.3 44.1 41.9 42.5 38.5 40.7 35.4 32.1 Feature phones (mn) 354.0 300.0 257.0 255.0 255.0 238.6 222.0 209.3 172.7 Total Sales 135,968 213,062 213,255 275,642 277,186 300,832 307,327 320,701 333,255 GM % 44.0% 48.8% 43.2% 35.7% 35.7% 35.0% 35.0% 35.1% 35.3% Op M% 18.6% 22.2% 12.1% 8.5% 8.4% 8.4% 8.4% 8.8% 8.9% EPS $20.13 $29.67 $16.74 $14.50 $14.50 $16.00 $16.00 $17.50 $18.25 EPS growth 57.1% 47.4% -43.6% -13.4% -13.4% 10.3% 10.4% 9.4% 4.2% Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Asia Semiconductor Sector 19 5 January 2017

Margins could finally stabilize at lower levels for Mediatek Mediatek's GMs stayed in the mid-30% range through 2H16 and we don't expect a meaningful improvement until 2H17 as the company's high-end chipsets will optimise for performance rather than cost, keeping up the risk on margin pressure. The non- smartphone business though at least (connectivity, set-tops, digital TV) is providing some buffer at margins above the corporate average. New chipsets offering cost reductions for the mass market tier would only launch from the middle of 2017 and cross over volume of the older chips in 2H17. The long wait for cost down chips in the entry tier gives Spreadtrum several more quarters to improve performance and competitiveness of its chips as an entry tier alternative.

Figure 45: Mediatek 4G ramping at lower margins Figure 46: Mediatek's stock pressured by lower GMs Sales (NT$mn) GM (%) Mediatek Stock GM / OpMs (%) 50,000 70% Price (NT$) 45,000 63% $700 70% 40,000 56% $600 60% 35,000 49% 30,000 42% $500 50% 25,000 35% $400 40% 20,000 28% 15,000 21% $300 30% 10,000 14% $200 20% 5,000 7% $100 10% 0 0%

$0 0%

1Q06 3Q06 1Q07 3Q07 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q11 3Q11 1Q12 3Q12 1Q13 3Q13 1Q14 3Q14 1Q15 3Q15 1Q16 3Q16

1Q17E 3Q17E

1Q03 4Q15 2Q02 4Q03 3Q04 2Q05 1Q06 4Q06 3Q07 2Q08 1Q09 4Q09 3Q10 2Q11 1Q12 4Q12 3Q13 2Q14 1Q15 3Q16 2G sales 3G (WCDMA+TD) sales LTE sales 3Q01 3G GM % LTE GM % Corporate GM % Share price Corporate GM % Corporate OpM % Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Asia Semiconductor Sector 20 5 January 2017

Stay selective positioning in the Asian supply chain In the Asian tech coverage, we are more cautious on the overall smartphone opportunity but would invest in companies where content or market share gains are still coming through and margins are protective through innovation or competitive advantage. We highlight implications for the major subsectors. Top picks in the chain ■ Foundry – Growth centered on iPhone 8 and new applications. We expect foundry are TSMC, Win Semi, outgrowth both on the advanced technology where TSMC is leading with higher share Egis, AAC and Sunny in mobile and graphics and also from Chinese foundries capitalising on the stepped-up Optical domestic semiconductor development. We are a bit sensitive on a pullback for SMIC following its strong performance in 2H16 so prefer Hua Hong at a discount valuation to 1x P/B with profitable 8" business model. We would get more constructive on Vanguard on a further pullback which brings valuation back to reasonable levels appropriate for its mild growth. The foundries are seeing rising depreciation in the next few years as higher capital intensity the past few years is still triggering increases, with a moderate ~10% increase for TSMC and likely very high ~30% increase for SMIC. Despite the higher depreciation burden, the foundries have kept capacity tight to maintain decent pricing and also avoid hits to GM from low utilisation. ■ IC Design: Neutral on MediaTek - Defending share at the expense of margin. IC design remains a competitive space with global players Qualcomm competing against Asian suppliers MediaTek and Spreadtrum and semi-captive Asian suppliers HiSilicon, Samsung and Leadcore. Mediatek will continue to improve its product portfolio in Helio series to gain back market share from Qualcomm in 4G and Spreadtrum in 3G. The company will also ship 30mn chips for Samsung's J/A series smartphones in 2017. Though Mediatek will gradually improve the cost structure through upgrading its modem in 2H17, we would note the company’s high-end chips will be optimised for performance rather than cost while chipsets offering cost reductions for the mass market tier would only launch from the middle of 2017, keeping pressure on margins at least through 1H17. We maintain our conservative outlook and remain NEUTRAL with a target price of NT$225 as the company doesn't yet control its destiny on pricing and margins due to fierce competition. ■ Back-end: Improving profitability offsets the slowing growth. The major back-end suppliers saw a modest improvement in revenue in the core package and test business in 2016 following the inventory correction in 2015 while SiP business declined as suppliers were balancing growth and profitability. We expect growth may continue to be mild in 2017 as suppliers are selective on system in package module work to manage profitability and are not yet ready for high volume fan-out solutions. 2017 should be the year for trials in fan-out packaging for the mobile customers, with 2018 the year for volume deployments, though fortunately we do not see TSMC extending into advanced packaging beyond its InFO package for Apple in 2017. ■ Display-related ICs: FocalTech, Chipbond and Egis. In the display-related IC space, we prefer FocalTech and Chipbond, as we think they are better positioned to benefit from the rising penetration of in-cell TDDI. For FocalTech, we estimate its in-cell IDC/TDDI shipments can triple in 2017 (60 mn units vs ~20mn in 2016), thanks to more design wins at panel makers. Besides the IDC for LTPS-based FHD panels, we expect its a-Si HD in-cell IDC with six masks (vs current 8-9 masks) to ramp up from 2H17. We believe the increasing revenue mix of IDC should help its GM to further improve in 2017. For Chipbond, the in-cell TDDI trend will benefit DDI backend as the integration of touch and driver IC still adopts their gold bumping packaging process but with larger chip size (more wafers) and longer testing time. We estimate Chipbond can enjoy 10- 40% better ASP for TDDI vs conventional driver IC. We also like Egis as the fingerprint sensor solution provider, as we think it will ride the fingerprint sensor proliferation in the next few years. We also expect Egis to penetrate into Chinese smartphone makers from 2Q17, after successfully ramping up its shipment to Samsung.

Asia Semiconductor Sector 21 5 January 2017

■ Compound / RF Semiconductors: Win Semi. In the Taiwan compound semiconductor space, we think Win Semi is well positioned to capture the growth led by rising penetration of carrier aggregation (CA) and WiFi spec upgrade, and could also become the main foundry partner for QualComm’s RF chips from 2H17. It is also diversifying into opto business, which offers better margins and should see more contribution from 2H17. ■ China Components Sector – content gainers better off. We expect upstream (semi and key components) to outperform downstream (assembly and OEMs) in 2017, and prefer key component upgrades especially dual-cam (Sunny Optical), glass (Lens Tech) and acoustics/RF (AAC Acoustics). We see the fast adoption of dual-cam could totally offset any pressure in shipments or GMs, so remain confident in our Sunny Optical estimates. For AAC, the company stated it already collected most of receivables from LeTV, the rest will be collected in six months, and doesn't see any necessity for write-offs. In addition, its RF mechanical business development at other clients (OPPO, Oneplus, Huawei, and Samsung) are well on-track. Figure 47: Key Asian suppliers in smartphones (in millions, unless otherwise stated)

Supply chain Key suppliers Foundry: TSMC, SMIC Back-end: Chipbond, King Yuan, JCET, Tiansui Huatian Asian fabless: MediaTek, Silicon Motion, Egis, Goodix, Focaltech Overseas fabless and IP: eMemory, Skyworks Compound / RF Semiconductors: Win Semi, Visual Photonics, AWSC, ACX, Murata Semiconductor Distribution: WPG PCBs: Kinsus, Unimicron Optical Lens: Largan, Sunny Optical Acoustics/Haptics: AAC Acoustics, Goertek, Alps Devices: Lenovo, Samsung, ZTE Display/Touch components: TPK, O-Film, Truly, AUO, Novatek, Himax, FocalTech Carriers: China Unicom, China Mobile, China Telecom

Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Asia Semiconductor Sector 22 5 January 2017

Companies Mentioned (Price as of 03-Jan-2017) AAC Technologies Holdings Inc (2018.HK, HK$70.55) Apple Inc (AAPL.OQ, $116.15) BlackBerry (BBRY.OQ, $6.96) China Mobile Limited (0941.HK, HK$82.0) China Telecom (0728.HK, HK$3.61) China Unicom Hong Kong Ltd (0762.HK, HK$9.13) Coolpad Group Limited (2369.HK, HK$0.79) Egis Technology Inc. (6462.TWO, NT$253.5) Ericsson (ERICb.ST, Skr53.3) Gionee Communication (Unlisted) Google (GOOAV.OQ^D14) HTC Corp (2498.TW, NT$79.2) Hi Silicon (Unlisted) Hua Hong Semiconductor Limited (1347.HK, HK$8.71) Intel Corp. (INTC.OQ, $36.6) LG Display Co Ltd. (034220.KS, W31,750) Largan Precision (3008.TW, NT$3795.0) Leadcore (Unlisted) Lenovo Group Ltd (0992.HK, HK$4.79) MediaTek Inc. (2454.TW, NT$218.0, NEUTRAL, TP NT$225.0) Meizu (Unlisted) Micromax (Unlisted) Motorola Solutions (MSI.N, $83.6) Nokia (NOKIA.HE, €4.57) Powertech Technology (6239.TW, NT$86.6) QUALCOMM Inc. (QCOM.OQ, $65.4) (005930.KS, W1,824,000) Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (0981.HK, HK$11.58) Sony (6758.T, ¥3,275) Spreadtrum Communication (SPRD.OQ^L13) Sunny Optical Technology Group Co.Limited (2382.HK, HK$34.05) Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (2330.TW, NT$183.0) Vanguard International Semiconductor (5347.TWO, NT$55.9) Win Semiconductors Corp (3105.TWO, NT$89.5) Xiaomi (Unlisted) ZTE Corporation (0763.HK, HK$12.94)

Disclosure Appendix Analyst Certification I, Randy Abrams, CFA, certify that (1) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about all of the subject companies and securities and (2) no part of my compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report.

3-Year Price and Rating History for MediaTek Inc. (2454.TW)

2454.TW Closing Price Target Price Date (NT$) (NT$) Rating 06-Jan-14 431.50 500.00 O 08-Apr-14 460.00 540.00 01-May-14 472.00 570.00 07-Oct-14 455.50 540.00 10-Feb-15 454.00 520.00 29-Mar-15 419.00 425.00 N 27-Apr-15 410.50 405.00 15-Jun-15 409.00 430.00 03-Aug-15 299.00 300.00 02-Nov-15 270.00 250.00 OUTPERFORM NEUTRAL 11-Jan-16 209.00 230.00 18-Apr-16 234.50 250.00 02-May-16 230.00 225.00 * Asterisk signifies initiation or assumption of coverage. The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received Compensation that is based upon various factors including Credit Suisse's total revenues, a portion of which are generated by Credit Suisse's investment banking activities As of December 10, 2012 Analysts’ stock rating are defined as follows: Outperform (O) : The stock’s total return is expected to outperform the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months. Neutral (N) : The stock’s total return is expected to be in line with the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months. Underperform (U) : The stock’s total return is expected to underperform the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months. *Relevant benchmark by region: As of 10th December 2012, Japanese ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector, with Outperforms representing the most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. As of 2nd October 2012, U.S. and Canadian as well as European ra tings are based on a stock’s total

Asia Semiconductor Sector 23 5 January 2017 return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector, with Outperforms representing the most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. For Latin American and non-Japan Asia stocks, ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark; prior to 2nd October 2012 U.S. and Canadian ratings were based on (1) a stock’s absolute total return potential to its current share price and (2) the relative attractiveness of a stock’s total return potential within an analyst’s coverage universe. For Australian and New Zealand stocks, the expected total return (ETR) calculation includes 12-month rolling dividend yield. An Outperform rating is assigned where an ETR is greater than or equal to 7.5%; Underperform where an ETR less than or equal to 5%. A Neutral may be assigned where the ETR is between -5% and 15%. The overlapping rating range allows analysts to assign a rating that puts ETR in the context of associated risks. Prior to 18 May 2015, ETR ranges for Outperform and Underperform ratings did not overlap with Neutral thresholds between 15% and 7.5%, which was in operation from 7 July 2011. Restricted (R) : In certain circumstances, Credit Suisse policy and/or applicable law and regulations preclude certain types of communications, including an investment recommendation, during the course of Credit Suisse's engagement in an investment banking transaction and in certain other circumstances. Not Rated (NR) : Credit Suisse Equity Research does not have an investment rating or view on the stock or any other securities related to the company at this time. Not Covered (NC) : Credit Suisse Equity Research does not provide ongoing coverage of the company or offer an investment rating or investment view on the equity security of the company or related products. Volatility Indicator [V] : A stock is defined as volatile if the stock price has moved up or down by 20% or more in a month in at least 8 of the past 24 months or the analyst expects significant volatility going forward. Analysts’ sector weightings are distinct from analysts’ stock ratings and are based on the analyst’s expectations for the fundamentals and/or valuation of the sector* relative to the group’s historic fundamentals and/or valuation: Overweight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is favorable over the next 12 months. Market Weight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is neutral over the next 12 months. Underweight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is cautious over the next 12 months. *An analyst’s coverage sector consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector. An analyst may cover multiple sectors. Credit Suisse's distribution of stock ratings (and banking clients) is:

Global Ratings Distribution Rating Versus universe (%) Of which banking clients (%) Outperform/Buy* 44% (64% banking clients) Neutral/Hold* 38% (59% banking clients) Underperform/Sell* 15% (53% banking clients) Restricted 3% *For purposes of the NYSE and NASD ratings distribution disclosure requirements, our stock ratings of Outperform, Neutral, and Underperform most closely correspond to Buy, Hold, and Sell, respectively; however, the meanings are not the same, as our stock ratings are determined on a relative basis. (Please refer to definitions above.) An investor's decision to buy or sell a security should be based on investment objectives, current holdings, and other individual factors. Important Global Disclosures Credit Suisse’s research reports are made available to clients through our proprietary research portal on CS PLUS. Credit Suisse research products may also be made available through third-party vendors or alternate electronic means as a convenience. Certain research products are only made available through CS PLUS. The services provided by Credit Suisse’s analysts to clients may depend on a specific client’s preferences regarding the frequency and manner of receiving communications, the client’s risk profile and investment, the size and scope of the overall client relationship with the Firm, as well as legal and regulatory constraints. To access all of Credit Suisse’s research that you are entitled to receive in the most timely manner, please contact your sales representative or go to https://plus.credit-suisse.com . Credit Suisse’s policy is to update research reports as it deems appropriate, based on developments with the subject company, the sector or the market that may have a material impact on the research views or opinions stated herein. Credit Suisse's policy is only to publish investment research that is impartial, independent, clear, fair and not misleading. For more detail please refer to Credit Suisse's Policies for Managing Conflicts of Interest in connection with Investment Research: http://www.csfb.com/research-and- analytics/disclaimer/managing_conflicts_disclaimer.html . Credit Suisse's policy is only to publish investment research that is impartial, independent, clear, fair and not misleading. For more detail please refer to Credit Suisse's Policies for Managing Conflicts of Interest in connection with Investment Research:

Target Price and Rating Valuation Methodology and Risks: (12 months) for MediaTek Inc. (2454.TW) Method: Our target price of NT$225 for Mediatek is based on 14x 2017E EPS (earnings per share), in-line with global peers. We have a conservative outlook as the company does yet control its destiny on pricing and margins due to fierce competition and thus have a NEUTRAL rating on Mediatek. Risk: Risks that could cause the share price to diverge from our NT$225 target price and cause us to change our NEUTRAL rating for Mediatek include the impact of competitive products and pricing, timely design acceptance by its customers, timely introduction of new technologies, ability to ramp new products into volume, industry-wide shifts in supply and demand for semiconductor products, industry overcapacity, availability of manufacturing capacity, and financial stability in end markets.

Please refer to the firm's disclosure website at https://rave.credit-suisse.com/disclosures for the definitions of abbreviations typically used in the target price method and risk sections. See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names

Asia Semiconductor Sector 24 5 January 2017

The subject company (2330.TW, 3105.TWO, AAPL.OQ, 005930.KS, QCOM.OQ, INTC.OQ, NOKIA.HE, 2498.TW, MSI.N, 6758.T, BBRY.OQ, 0992.HK, 0763.HK, 034220.KS) currently is, or was during the 12-month period preceding the date of distribution of this report, a client of Credit Suisse. Credit Suisse provided investment banking services to the subject company (AAPL.OQ, 005930.KS, QCOM.OQ, INTC.OQ, MSI.N, BBRY.OQ, 0992.HK, 034220.KS) within the past 12 months. Credit Suisse has received investment banking related compensation from the subject company (AAPL.OQ, 005930.KS, QCOM.OQ, INTC.OQ, MSI.N, BBRY.OQ, 0992.HK, 034220.KS) within the past 12 months Credit Suisse expects to receive or intends to seek investment banking related compensation from the subject company (2454.TW, 2330.TW, 2382.HK, 6239.TW, 6462.TWO, 2018.HK, 3105.TWO, AAPL.OQ, 005930.KS, QCOM.OQ, INTC.OQ, 0762.HK, 0728.HK, NOKIA.HE, 2498.TW, MSI.N, 6758.T, BBRY.OQ, 0992.HK, 0763.HK, 034220.KS, 3008.TW, 0981.HK) within the next 3 months. As of the end of the preceding month, Credit Suisse beneficially own 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of (2454.TW, 2330.TW, 6239.TW, 6462.TWO, 0762.HK, 0728.HK, 2498.TW, 0992.HK, 0981.HK). Credit Suisse beneficially holds >0.5% long position of the total issued share capital of the subject company (005930.KS, 0728.HK, 034220.KS, 3008.TW). Credit Suisse has a material conflict of interest with the subject company (QCOM.OQ) . Credit Suisse is Financial Advisor to NXP Semiconductors (NXPI.OQ) on their sale to Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM.OQ). Credit Suisse has a material conflict of interest with the subject company (INTC.OQ) . Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC is acting as financial advisor to Intel Corp (INTL) on its announced proposed acquisition of LSI’s Axxia Networking Business from Avago Technologies Limited (AVGO). For other important disclosures concerning companies featured in this report, including price charts, please visit the website at https://rave.credit- suisse.com/disclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683. For date and time of production, dissemination and history of recommendation for the subject company(ies) featured in this report, disseminated within the past 12 months, please refer to the link: https://rave.credit-suisse.com/disclosures/view/report?i=276689&v=-72gqlpxatshaqveluec802u87 . Important Regional Disclosures Singapore recipients should contact Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch for any matters arising from this research report. The analyst(s) involved in the preparation of this report may participate in events hosted by the subject company, including site visits. Credit Suisse does not accept or permit analysts to accept payment or reimbursement for travel expenses associated with these events. Restrictions on certain Canadian securities are indicated by the following abbreviations: NVS--Non-Voting shares; RVS--Restricted Voting Shares; SVS--Subordinate Voting Shares. Individuals receiving this report from a Canadian investment dealer that is not affiliated with Credit Suisse should be advised that this report may not contain regulatory disclosures the non-affiliated Canadian investment dealer would be required to make if this were its own report. For Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.'s policies and procedures regarding the dissemination of equity research, please visit https://www.credit- suisse.com/sites/disclaimers-ib/en/canada-research-policy.html. The following disclosed European company/ies have estimates that comply with IFRS: (ERICb.ST, NOKIA.HE). Credit Suisse has acted as lead manager or syndicate member in a public offering of securities for the subject company (AAPL.OQ, 0992.HK) within the past 3 years. Principal is not guaranteed in the case of equities because equity prices are variable. Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at any time after that. Taiwanese Disclosures: This research report is for reference only. Investors should carefully consider their own investment risk. Investment results are the responsibility of the individual investor. Reports may not be reprinted without permission of CS. Reports written by Taiwan based analysts on non-Taiwan listed companies are not considered recommendations to buy or sell securities under Taiwan Stock Exchange Operational Regulations Governing Securities Firms Recommending Trades in Securities to Customers. This research report is authored by: Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch ...... Randy Abrams, CFA ; Haas Liu To the extent this is a report authored in whole or in part by a non-U.S. analyst and is made available in the U.S., the following are important disclosures regarding any non-U.S. analyst contributors: The non-U.S. research analysts listed below (if any) are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. The non-U.S. research analysts listed below may not be associated persons of CSSU and therefore may not be subject to the NASD Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account. Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch ...... Randy Abrams, CFA ; Haas Liu For Credit Suisse disclosure information on other companies mentioned in this report, please visit the website at https://rave.credit- suisse.com/disclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683.

Asia Semiconductor Sector 25 5 January 2017

This report is produced by subsidiaries and affiliates of Credit Suisse operating under its Global Markets Division. For more information on our structure, please use the following link: https://www.credit-suisse.com/who-we-are This report may contain material that is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Credit Suisse or its affiliates ("CS") to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to CS. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of CS. All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of CS or its affiliates.The information, tools and material presented in this report are provided to you for information purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. CS may not have taken any steps to ensure that the securities referred to in this report are suitable for any particular investor. CS will not treat recipients of this report as its customers by virtue of their receiving this report. The investments and services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment services. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances, or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation to you. CS does not advise on the tax consequences of investments and you are advised to contact an independent tax adviser. Please note in particular that the bases and levels of taxation may change. Information and opinions presented in this report have been obtained or derived from sources believed by CS to be reliable, but CS makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. CS accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that such liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to CS. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. CS may have issued, and may in the future issue, other communications that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those communications reflect the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and CS is under no obligation to ensure that such other communications are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report. Some investments referred to in this report will be offered solely by a single entity and in the case of some investments solely by CS, or an associate of CS or CS may be the only market maker in such investments. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgment at its original date of publication by CS and are subject to change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. The value of securities and financial instruments is subject to exchange rate fluctuation that may have a positive or adverse effect on the price or income of such securities or financial instruments. Investors in securities such as ADR's, the values of which are influenced by currency volatility, effectively assume this risk. Structured securities are complex instruments, typically involve a high degree of risk and are intended for sale only to sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. The market value of any structured security may be affected by changes in economic, financial and political factors (including, but not limited to, spot and forward interest and exchange rates), time to maturity, market conditions and volatility, and the credit quality of any issuer or reference issuer. Any investor interested in purchasing a structured product should conduct their own investigation and analysis of the product and consult with their own professional advisers as to the risks involved in making such a purchase. Some investments discussed in this report may have a high level of volatility. High volatility investments may experience sudden and large falls in their value causing losses when that investment is realised. Those losses may equal your original investment. Indeed, in the case of some investments the potential losses may exceed the amount of initial investment and, in such circumstances, you may be required to pay more money to support those losses. Income yields from investments may fluctuate and, in consequence, initial capital paid to make the investment may be used as part of that income yield. Some investments may not be readily realisable and it may be difficult to sell or realise those investments, similarly it may prove difficult for you to obtain reliable information about the value, or risks, to which such an investment is exposed. This report may provide the addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, websites. Except to the extent to which the report refers to website material of CS, CS has not reviewed any such site and takes no responsibility for the content contained therein. Such address or hyperlink (including addresses or hyperlinks to CS's own website material) is provided solely for your convenience and information and the content of any such website does not in any way form part of this document. Accessing such website or following such link through this report or CS's website shall be at your own risk. This report is issued and distributed in European Union (except Switzerland): by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, One Cabot Square, London E14 4QJ, England, which is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. Germany: Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited Niederlassung Frankfurt am Main regulated by the Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht ("BaFin"). United States and Canada: Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC; Switzerland: Credit Suisse AG; Brazil: Banco de Investimentos Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A or its affiliates; Mexico: Banco Credit Suisse (México), S.A. (transactions related to the securities mentioned in this report will only be effected in compliance with applicable regulation); Japan: by Credit Suisse Securities (Japan) Limited, Financial Instruments Firm, Director-General of Kanto Local Finance Bureau ( Kinsho) No. 66, a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan, Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; Hong Kong: Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited; Australia: Credit Suisse Equities (Australia) Limited; Thailand: Credit Suisse Securities (Thailand) Limited, regulated by the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand, having registered address at 990 Abdulrahim Place, 27th Floor, Unit 2701, Rama IV Road, Silom, Bangrak, Bangkok10500, Thailand, Tel. +66 2614 6000; Malaysia: Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd; Singapore: Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch; India: Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited (CIN no.U67120MH1996PTC104392) regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India as Research Analyst (registration no. INH 000001030) and as Stock Broker (registration no. INB230970637; INF230970637; INB010970631; INF010970631), having registered address at 9th Floor, Ceejay House, Dr.A.B. Road, Worli, Mumbai - 18, India, T- +91-22 6777 3777; South Korea: Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, Seoul Branch; Taiwan: Credit Suisse AG Taipei Securities Branch; Indonesia: PT Credit Suisse Securities Indonesia; Philippines:Credit Suisse Securities (Philippines ) Inc., and elsewhere in the world by the relevant authorised affiliate of the above. Additional Regional Disclaimers Hong Kong: Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited ("CSHK") is licensed and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong under the laws of Hong Kong, which differ from Australian laws. CSHKL does not hold an Australian financial services licence (AFSL) and is exempt from the requirement to hold an AFSL under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) under Class Order 03/1103 published by the ASIC in respect of financial services provided to Australian wholesale clients (within the meaning of section 761G of the Act). Research on Taiwanese securities produced by Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch has been prepared by a registered Senior Business Person. Australia (to the extent services are offered in Australia): Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited (“CSSEL”) and Credit Suisse International (“CSI”) are authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and the Prudential Regulation Authority under UK laws, which differ from Australian Laws. CSSEL and CSI do not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (“AFSL”) and are exempt from the requirement to hold an AFSL under the Corporations Act (Cth) 2001 (“Corporations Act”) under Class Order 03/1099 published by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”), in respect of the financial services provided to Australian wholesale clients (within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act). This material is not for distribution to retail clients and is directed exclusively at Credit Suisse's professional clients and eligible counterparties as defined by the FCA, and wholesale clients as defined under section 761G of the Corporations Act. Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited (“CSHK”) is licensed and regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong under the laws of Hong Kong, which differ from Australian laws. CSHKL does not hold an AFSL and is exempt from the requirement to hold an AFSL under the Corporations Act under Class Order 03/1103 published by the ASIC in respect of financial services provided to Australian wholesale clients (within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act). Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (CSSU) and Credit Suisse Asset Management LLC (CSAM LLC) are licensed and regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission of the United States under the laws of the United States, which differ from Australian laws. CSSU and CSAM LLC do not hold an AFSL and is exempt from the requirement to hold an AFSL under the Corporations Act under Class Order 03/1100 published by the ASIC in respect of financial services provided to Australian wholesale clients (within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act). Malaysia: Research provided to residents of Malaysia is authorised by the Head of Research for Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, to whom they should direct any queries on +603 2723 2020. Singapore: This report has been prepared and issued for distribution in Singapore to institutional investors, accredited investors and expert investors (each as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations) only, and is also distributed by Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch to overseas investors (as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations). Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch may distribute reports produced by its foreign entities or affiliates pursuant to an arrangement under Regulation 32C of the Financial Advisers Regulations. Singapore recipients should contact Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch at +65-6212-2000 for matters arising from, or in connection with, this report. By virtue of your status as an institutional investor, accredited investor, expert investor or overseas investor, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch is exempted from complying with certain compliance requirements under the Financial Advisers Act, Chapter 110 of Singapore (the “FAA”), the Financial Advisers Regulations and the relevant Notices and Guidelines issued thereunder, in respect of any financial advisory service which Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch may provide to you. UAE: This information is being distributed by Credit Suisse AG (DIFC Branch), duly licensed and regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (“DFSA”). Related financial services or products are only made available to Professional Clients or Market Counterparties, as defined by the DFSA, and are not intended for any other persons. Credit Suisse AG (DIFC Branch) is located on Level 9 East, The Gate Building, DIFC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. EU: This report has been produced by subsidiaries and affiliates of Credit Suisse operating under its Global Markets Division This research may not conform to Canadian disclosure requirements. In jurisdictions where CS is not already registered or licensed to trade in securities, transactions will only be effected in accordance with applicable securities legislation, which will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may require that the trade be made in accordance with applicable exemptions from registration or licensing requirements. Non-US customers wishing to effect a transaction should contact a CS entity in their local jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. US customers wishing to effect a transaction should do so only by contacting a representative at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in the US. Please note that this research was originally prepared and issued by CS for distribution to their market professional and institutional investor customers. Recipients who are not market professional or institutional investor customers of CS should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment decision based on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents. This research may relate to investments or services of a person outside of the UK or to other matters which are not authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority or in respect of which the protections of the Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority for private customers and/or the UK compensation scheme may not be available, and further details as to where this may be the case are available upon request in respect of this report. CS may provide various services to US municipal entities or obligated persons ("municipalities"), including suggesting individual transactions or trades and entering into such transactions. Any services CS provides to municipalities are not viewed as "advice" within the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. CS is providing any such services and related information solely on an arm's length basis and not as an advisor or fiduciary to the municipality. In connection with the provision of the any such services, there is no agreement, direct or indirect, between any municipality (including the officials,management, employees or agents thereof) and CS for CS to provide advice to the municipality. Municipalities should consult with their financial, accounting and legal advisors regarding any such services provided by CS. In addition, CS is not acting for direct or indirect compensation to solicit the municipality on behalf of an unaffiliated broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, or investment adviser for the purpose of obtaining or retaining an engagement by the municipality for or in connection with Municipal Financial Products, the issuance of municipal securities, or of an investment adviser to provide investment advisory services to or on behalf of the municipality. If this report is being distributed by a financial institution other than Credit Suisse AG, or its affiliates, that financial institution is solely responsible for distribution. Clients of that institution should contact that institution to effect a transaction in the securities mentioned in this report or require further information. This report does not constitute investment advice by Credit Suisse to the clients of the distributing financial institution, and neither Credit Suisse AG, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors and employees accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from their use of this report or its content. Principal is not guaranteed. Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at any time after that. Copyright © 2017 CREDIT SUISSE AG and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Investment principal on bonds can be eroded depending on sale price or market price. In addition, there are bonds on which investment principal can be eroded due to changes in redemption amounts. Care is required when investing in such instruments. When you purchase non-listed Japanese fixed income securities (Japanese government bonds, Japanese municipal bonds, Japanese government guaranteed bonds, Japanese corporate bonds) from CS as a seller, you will be requested to pay the purchase price only.

Asia Semiconductor Sector 26