Management Discussion and Analysis for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Management Discussion and Analysis for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 Management Discussion and Analysis For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of financial condition and results of operations dated August 29, 2018 relates to unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2018 of MPX Bioceutical Corporation (formerly The Canadian Bioceutical Corporation) (“MPX” or the “Corporation”). This MD&A should be read together with the Corporation’s unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2018 together with the related notes as well as the audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017 together with the related notes. MPX’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) which requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amount of revenue and expenses incurred during the reporting period. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods. Certain statements in this MD&A may contain “forward-looking information”, within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including “safe harbour provisions” of the Securities Act (Ontario) with respect to the Corporation and its subsidiaries. Such statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the growth of the business, production and revenue expectations and the licensing of facilities. These statements are subject to certain risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included in the forward- looking statements. The words “believe”, “plan”, “intend”, “estimate”, “expect”, or “anticipate” and similar expressions as well as future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “should”, “would”, and “could” often identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. With respect to forward-looking statements contained in this MD&A, the Corporation has made assumptions and applied certain factors regarding, amongst other things, future cannabis pricing; cannabis cultivation yields; costs of inputs; its ability to market products successfully to its anticipated clients; reliance on key personnel and contracted relationships with 3rd parties; the regulatory environment in both the United States (the “U.S.” or the “United States”) and Canada; the application of federal, state and provincial laws; and the impact of increasing competition. These forward-looking statements are also subject to the risks and uncertainties discussed in the “Risks and Uncertainties” section and elsewhere in this MD&A and other risks detailed from time to time in the publicly-filed disclosure documents of the Corporation which are available at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions which could cause actual results to differ materially from the conclusions, forecasts or projections anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Because of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The Corporation’s forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this MD&A and, except as required by law, MPX undertakes no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or circumstances. Unless otherwise stated, all dollar amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars. This MD&A has been prepared in accordance with the MD&A disclosure requirements established under National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations (“NI 51-102”) of the Canadian Securities Administrators. Further MPX details and filings are available at www.sedar.com and on the Corporation’s website www.mpxbioceutical.com. CANNABIS INDUSTRY IN THE UNITED STATES MPX derives a substantial portion of its revenues from the cannabis industry pursuant to legislation in certain U.S. states, more than a majority of which have decriminalized under state law either medical or medical and adult-use marijuana, although marijuana remains illegal under U.S. federal law. MPX is directly and indirectly involved in the cannabis industry by virtue of its own involvement or that of its subsidiaries in the U.S. where state and local laws permit such activities. Currently, MPX and/or its subsidiaries are directly and indirectly engaged whether on its own accord or via management or other service arrangements as described herein, in the cultivation, manufacture/production, possession, use, sale or distribution of cannabis in the Arizona medical marijuana market and the medical and adult-use market in Nevada. MPX is also in the early stage of expanding its operations in Massachusetts and Maryland. MPX’s core business involves providing substantial management, staffing, procurement, advisory, financial, real estate rental, logistics and administrative services to cannabis businesses. See “Involvement in the United States Cannabis Industry”. The U.S. federal government regulates drugs through the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 811) (the “CSA”), which places controlled substances, including marijuana, in a schedule. Cannabis is classified as a Schedule I drug, Schedule I drugs are those deemed to have a high potential for abuse, no accepted medical use in the U.S. and a lack of accepted safety for the use of the drug under medical supervision. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has not approved cannabis as a safe and effective drug for any indication. While the FDA has not approved cannabis as a safe and effective drug, on June 25, 2018, the FDA approved a drug named Epidiolex, which is the first drug comprised of an active ingredient derived from marijuana. Epidiolex is used to treat rare, severe forms of epilepsy. Almost half of the states in the U.S. have enacted legislation to regulate the sale and use of medical and adult-use cannabis with various, limits, restrictions and protocol applicable in each state. Notwithstanding the permissive regulatory environment of medical cannabis at the state level, cannabis continues to be categorized as a controlled substance and as such, is in violation of federal law in the U.S. Despite the current state of the federal law and the CSA, certain states have legalized the adult-use of cannabis, including Nevada and Massachusetts, where the Corporation has ongoing and early-stage operations, respectively. See “Risk Factors” under the heading “Variation in State Regulations”. In the U.S., marijuana is largely regulated at the state level. State laws regulating cannabis are in direct conflict with the federal CSA, which makes cannabis use and possession federally illegal. Although certain states authorize medical or adult-use cannabis, under U.S. federal law, the possession, use, cultivation and transfer of cannabis or any related drug paraphernalia is illegal and any such acts, even by state licensed or registered entities, are subject to criminal prosecution under federal law. The Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution establishes that the Unites States Constitution and U.S. federal laws made pursuant to it are paramount and in case of conflict between federal and state law, the federal law shall apply. Notwithstanding the permissive regulatory environment of medical cannabis at the state level, cannabis continues to be categorized as a controlled substance under the CSA and as such, is in violation of federal law in the U.S. Despite the current state of the federal law and the CSA, certain states have legalized the recreational use of cannabis, including Massachusetts, where the Corporation is expanding its operations. On January 4, 2018, U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a memorandum to U.S. district attorneys which rescinded previous guidance from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) specific to cannabis enforcement in the U.S., including the Cole Memorandum (as defined herein). With the rescission of the Cole Memorandum, U.S. federal prosecutors have been given discretion in determining whether to prosecute cannabis related violations of U.S. federal law. See “Risk Factors” under the heading “U.S. Federal Regulation“. There is no guarantee that state laws legalizing and regulating the sale and use of cannabis will not be repealed, amended or overturned, or that local governmental authorities will not limit the applicability of state laws or restrict permissible activities within their respective jurisdictions. Unless and until the U.S. Congress amends the CSA with respect to medical and/or adult-use cannabis (and as to the timing or scope of any such potential amendments there can be no assurance), there is a risk that the federal authorities may more rigorously enforce current federal law. If the federal government begins to enforce federal laws relating to cannabis in states where the sale and use of cannabis is currently legal, or if existing applicable state laws are repealed, amended or overturned, MPX’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects would be materially affected. See “Risk Factors” under the heading “U.S. Federal Regulation”. 2 On June 26, 2018,
Recommended publications
  • The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on the Labor Supply of Older Adults: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 10489 The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on the Labor Supply of Older Adults: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study Lauren Hersch Nicholas Johanna Catherine Maclean JANUARY 2017 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 10489 The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on the Labor Supply of Older Adults: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study Lauren Hersch Nicholas Johns Hopkins University Johanna Catherine Maclean Temple University, NBER and IZA JANUARY 2017 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 10489 JANUARY 2017 ABSTRACT The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on the Labor Supply of Older Adults: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study* We study the effect of state medical marijuana laws on labor supply among older adults; the demographic group with the highest rates of many health conditions for which marijuana may be an effective treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • CRESCO LABS INC. November 30, 2018 LISTING STATEMENT
    CRESCO LABS INC. November 30, 2018 LISTING STATEMENT - FORM 2A IN CONNECTION WITH THE LISTING OF THE SHARES OF CRESCO LABS INC., THE ENTITY FORMERLY KNOWN AS RANDSBURG INTERNATIONAL GOLD CORP., AFTER THE REVERSE TAKEOVER BY CRESCO LABS, LLC MARIJUANA IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. FEDERAL LAW AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF RELEVANT LAWS IS A SIGNIFICANT RISK. Cresco Labs Inc. indirectly holds all the voting interests and an approximate 53% equity interest in Cresco Labs, LLC, the entity through which all of the operating subsidiaries of Cresco Labs, LLC are held. Shareholders are cautioned that at this time, the outstanding Subordinate Voting Shares and Proportionate Voting Shares does not represent all of the equity interest in Cresco Labs, LLC. Cresco Labs Inc. derives a substantial portion of its revenues from the cannabis industry in certain states of the United States, which industry is illegal under United States federal law. Cresco Labs Inc. is indirectly involved (through its licensed subsidiaries) in the cannabis industry in the United States where local state laws permit such activities. Currently, its subsidiaries are directly engaged in the manufacturing, possession, use, sale or distribution of cannabis in the recreational and/or medicinal cannabis marketplace in the States of Illinois, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Nevada, Arizona and California and will begin such activities in New York, Massachusetts and Maryland in the near term. The United States federal government regulates drugs through the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 811 (the "CSA"), which places controlled substances, including cannabis, in a schedule. Cannabis is classified as a Schedule I drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Medical Cannabis & Housing
    Medical Marijuana & Housing Fact Sheet Medical Cannabis & Housing Medical Cannabis in Maryland: Overview ● In 2013, the Maryland General Assembly enacted the state’s first legislation creating a framework for the medicinal use of cannabis. Chapter 403 of the Acts of MD 2013 ● A “qualifying patient” may possess up to a 30-day supply of medical cannabis without being subject to arrest, prosecution, or any civil or administrative penalty. The Natalie LaPrade Medical Cannabis Commission will determine what constitutes a 30-day supply. Health-General Article 13–3313(a). ● On June 26, 2015, the Commission published proposed regulations governing the growth, sale, distribution, possession and use of medical cannabis. Maryland Register, Vol. 42, Issue 13, pages 812-45 (June 26, 2015). The comment period closed July 27, 2015, and final regulations are anticipated soon. At this time, medical cannabis is not available for sale or use in Maryland. Federal Law Concerning Marijuana Under the federal Controlled Substances Act, marijuana is categorized as a Schedule 1 drug that has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use in treatment in the United States; therefore, use and possession are illegal. 21 U.S.C. §812 Schedule 1(c)(17) ● Despite federal law, as of April 2015, at least 23 states, along with the District of Columbia and Guam, have passed laws exempting qualified users of medical marijuana from penalties imposed under state law, and created state medical marijuana programs. See Colorado Medical Marijuana Code, C.R.S. 12-43.3- 101 et seq.; Hawai’i Uniform Controlled Substances Act, Haw. Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Cannabis Comes in Many Forms Alternative Methods of Cannabinoid Delivery
    OUR LOGO Hamsa A universal symbol of Peace, Hope, Protection, and Healing. Treasured by Muslims, Christians, Jews and others, both the Hebrew word “hamesh” and the Arabic word hamsa have the same source, meaning “five”, hence the hand representing - Peace, Hope Protection and Healing OUR MISSION… to provide you with the best patient experience possible, in a professional, warm, and comfortable environment, offering the highest quality and largest variety of medicinal grade marijuana and marijuana concentrates, as well as books and accessories, at great prices. TAKOMA WELLNESS CENTER HOURS OF OPERATIONS Monday – Friday 1:00 pm – 7:00 pm Saturday CLOSED Sunday 11:30 am – 5:00 pm 2001 IOM Quality Chasm Report CANNABIS Cannabinoids: 3 Varieties Endocannabinoids (Di Marzo 1998): natural endogenous compounds binding cannabinoid receptors (e.g., anandamide and 2-AG Arachidonoylglycerol) whose functions are: “relax, eat, sleep, forget and protect” in human beings Phytocannabinoids (Pate 1994): terpenophenolic 21-C plant compounds found in the genus Cannabis (e.g., THC, CBD) Synthetic Cannabinoids (e.g., ajulemic acid) that also affect cannabinoid receptors. Dronabinol (e.g. Marinol) Russo, E.B. 2008. Cannabinoids in management of difficult to control pain. Therapeutics & Clinical Risk Management 4(1):245-259. Phytocannabinoids: Produced in Trichomes ➢THC and other cannabinoids are produced in the trichomes ➢Trichomes are predominant in the flowers and leaves of the female Cannabis plant Cannabis sativa plant Terpenes: Smells & Therapeutic Effects SATIVA Sativa plants are used most commonly to elevate a depressed mood. Primarily the effects of sativas are on the mind and emotion. They tend to more stimulating, uplifting, energizing, and creativity enhancing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Legalization: an Evolving Framework for BC Municipalities
    CANNABIS LEGALIZATION AN EVOLVING FRAMEWORK FOR BC MUNICIPALITIES February 2018 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1 BACKGROUND 7 Cannabis in Canada – A timeline ....................................................................... 7 Bill C-45, Cannabis Act ........................................................................................ 8 Jurisdictional responsibilities ........................................................................... 10 Current context ................................................................................................. 11 2 CANNABIS IN 2018 13 Definition .................................................................................................. 13 Consumption methods ............................................................................. 14 Chemical composition .............................................................................. 14 Cannabis users ......................................................................................... 15 Rationale for cannabis use ....................................................................... 16 Prevalence of cannabis use ...................................................................... 17 Perception of cannabis ............................................................................. 18 Cannabis impairment ............................................................................... 19 Risks .................................................................................................................... 21 Medical benefits
    [Show full text]
  • Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("Md&A")
    INDIVA LIMITED MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ("MD&A") FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ("MD&A") The following is a discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Indiva Limited ("Indiva" or the "Company") for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Company's condensed consolidated interim financial statements and accompanying notes for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 (the "Interim Financial Statements"). All amounts in the MD&A are in Canadian dollars unless indicated otherwise. The Company's accounting policies are in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The Company’s continuous disclosure documents are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Indiva does not engage in any U.S. marijuana-related activities as defined in CSA Staff Notice 51-352 (Revised) – Issuers with U.S. Marijuana-Related Activities dated February 8, 2018 (the "CSA Notice"). While the Company has partnered with U.S.-based companies, these entities are not engaged in the cultivation, possession or distribution of marijuana. Instead, the Company has partnered with U.S.-based companies which develop and licence intellectual property and copyright branding to the cannabis market, and do not engage in 'plant-touching' activities. The effective date of this MD&A is November 29, 2019. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This MD&A includes certain “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation that are based upon current expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and views of future events of management at the date hereof, and which involve risks and uncertainties associated with our business and the environment in which the business operates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on the Labor Supply of Older Adults: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hersch Nicholas, Lauren; Maclean, J. Catherine Working Paper The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on the Labor Supply of Older Adults: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study IZA Discussion Papers, No. 10489 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Hersch Nicholas, Lauren; Maclean, J. Catherine (2017) : The Effect of Medical Marijuana Laws on the Labor Supply of Older Adults: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 10489, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/161112 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No.
    [Show full text]
  • California Medical Marijuana Recommendation Arizona Disoensary
    California Medical Marijuana Recommendation Arizona Disoensary Fearsome and thickety Jim fixing while alchemical Pablo creep her Denys bafflingly and slotting sincerely. Virginian Elwood usually vets some limning or fared foolhardily. Mind-bending Allen slates or engage some rifle full, however stilted Thor compel bareknuckle or repress. Rhode island and strong sativas strains of the state drivers license dispensary in public on medical issue your california medical marijuana recommendation arizona disoensary will complete understanding that! When visiting Oregon, you need be careful not not exceed those limits. Privately held in arizona considers chronic pain relief, medical marijuana is right of. More information maintained in kentucky with health issues involving impaired or how you with federal law is flushed with california medical marijuana recommendation arizona disoensary back to? Do you find out our customers daily due to arizona medical marijuana. If talking to a paddle about medical cannabis feels a little overwhelming, there are services available to question you refer through it could ease. We apologize for qualified condition that medical marijuana regulations, but when it probably is successful appointment on more for california medical marijuana recommendation arizona disoensary of medical? An AZ MMJ card is a bell of ID patients present at medical dispensaries to. Fresh lick of secret box, the scent is nice rich strong. The regulation and patient, and everywhere legal medical condition or use the campaign manager for california medical marijuana recommendation arizona disoensary in the forum below to obtain marijuana with. Their privacy of patients is recognized recommendations, california medical marijuana recommendation arizona disoensary or the. Id please enter the california medical marijuana recommendation arizona disoensary does recognize california.
    [Show full text]
  • Ianthus Capital Holdings, Inc
    iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 Management’s Discussion and Analysis For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (In thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless stated otherwise) Company Overview iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”, or “ICH”, or “iAnthus”) is one of the largest Multi-State Operators (MSOs) in the United States, providing investors with diversified exposure to the regulated cannabis industry. We develop, own and operate, what we believe to be, the best-in-class licensed cannabis cultivation, processing and dispensary facilities and we offer our innovative branded cannabis products in the United States. Through our subsidiaries, we currently own and/or operate 21 dispensaries and 13 cultivation/processing facilities throughout the eastern and western regions of the United States and distribute our cannabis products to over 100 dispensaries. Under our existing licenses, interests and contractual arrangements, we have the capacity to own and/or operate up to 68 dispensaries and up to 15 cultivation/processing facilities, and manufacture and distribute our cannabis products in 11 states with an aggregate population of approximately 121 million. Our multi-state operations encompass the full spectrum of medical and adult-use cannabis enterprises, including cultivation, processing, product development, wholesale-distribution and retail. Our cannabis products include flower and trim, products containing cannabis flower and trim (such as pre-rolls), cannabis infused products, and products containing cannabis extracts (such as vape cartridges, concentrates, wax products, oils, tinctures, topical creams and edibles). We are an innovative leader in the burgeoning regulated cannabis industry in the United States and we are committed to creating a distinctive customer retail experience at our branded stores nationally and a portfolio of branded cannabis products recognized both in the United States and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Cannabis Around the World Mag.Indd
    A HANDBOOK GUIDE ANALYZING MEDICAL CANNABIS REGIMES, AND THEIR IMPACTS. CONTENTS QUALITY ISSUES 2 Introduction ISSUE 1: Quality Issues 3 PRODUCT QUALITY • Issue 1: Product quality 4 Comparing• Issue Overseas 2: Contaminants Jurisdictions 5 and/or raw cannabis. At the most expensive end of the spectrum are the pharmaceutical GMP (Good AManufacturing key consideration Practice) that allstandards, jurisdictions as adhered face is de�ining to by GW an Pharma,acceptable the quality manufacturers standard forof Sativex;cannabis the products Dutch company Bedrocan; and top tier Canadian manufacturers who have recently attained or are pursuing these • Scoring System 6 of time and money to attain. It is the standard most closely aligned with our current pharmaceutical model. A patchwork of state successes, hampered by federal law. standards,However, the such impact as Tilray, on the CanniMed cost to patients and Canopy is immense. Growth. The GMP standard requires a signi�icant investment The United States: 7 At the other end of the scale, as an early legaliser of medical cannabis, California initially had no product standards for its medical regime, allowing dangerous pesticides and plant growth regulators to be used. • California: First to reform 8 However, decent product standards were recently enacted via the adult use law in California. • Alabama: CBD only 9 As a compromise solution, Canada has set up a regime known as GPP (Good Production Practices) [1], where products are made to a high standard. Under GPP, variation between batches based on the potency of the • Arizona: Massive patient uptake 10 costs, as batches that vary in potency no longer need to be discarded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Cannabis Company, Inc
    THE SUPREME CANNABIS COMPANY, INC. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 Date: February 12, 2019 THE SUPREME CANNABIS COMPANY, INC. Management’s Discussion and Analysis The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with The Supreme Cannabis Company, Inc. (the “Company” or “Supreme”) condensed interim consolidated financial statements and notes for the three and six months ended December 31, 2018 (the “Financial Statements”). The Financial Statements, together with this MD&A are intended to provide investors with a reasonable basis for assessing the financial performance of Supreme as well as forward-looking statements relating to future performance. The financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). All amounts are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. This MD&A contains disclosures up to February 12, 2019. Forward-Looking Statements This MD&A contains certain information that may constitute “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) which are based upon the Company’s current internal expectations, estimates, projections, assumptions and beliefs. Such statements can, in some cases, be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "expect," "likely", "may," "will," "should," "intend," "anticipate," "potential," "proposed," "estimate" and other similar words, including negative and grammatical variations thereof, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” happen, or by discussions of strategy. Forward-looking statements include estimates, plans, expectations, opinions, forecasts, projections, targets, guidance, or other statements that are not statements of fact. The forward-looking statements included in this MD&A are made only as of the date of this MD&A.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Information Form
    CRONOS GROUP INC. ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM For the year ended December 31, 2018 DATED: March 25, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL MATTERS ............................................................................................................................................... 3 FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION ............................................................................................................... 3 CORPORATE STRUCTURE .................................................................................................................................... 6 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ............................................................................................... 7 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ..................................................................................................................... 13 ALTRIA STRATEGIC INVESTMENT ................................................................................................................. 39 RISK FACTORS ....................................................................................................................................................... 43 DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS ..................................................................................................................... 76 CAPITAL STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................................... 76 MARKET FOR SECURITIES ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]