Town Directory, Part X-A, Series-11
~rof 'fiT if~~;n 1981 CENSUS OF INDIA 1981
seRIES-II MADHYA PRADESH
~q-~-3l PART - X-A
TOWN DIRECTORY
1110 ~o ~.. ~lf sr!tl~fi1ifi iifT ~fi 'ili1~IUI'11 ~ ff'Slr sr~'QI'
K. C. DUBEY of the Indian Adminittratl'yf St'''''iC~ Director of Censu!. Operation~ Madhya Pradesh
~,,;n 1981-5I~ lit""" 1981 CENSUS-PUBLICATION PLAN (1981 • ~olitlllt"'r .-.n~ ad'.", "(~ 1IIf·.~1 11" f"""t~ 'Ill" ,,~1f~er tM) (1981 Censu'l1 Publl;:atjon : Series 11 in all India Series wJII be pubU,hecllD tbe followl.8 parts)
'IIr('1'( ~ .. Sl'1!'iffi",
m;r I-ar 3iillioaf"", Rlftt-~ Part I-A Administration Report-Enumeration
'qTtI'I-i( s(Q,,~f"1i ~-mr~ Part I-B Administration Report-Tabulation
'fTlTll-1l' ~~~~ Part II-A General P.:lpulation Tables
"IT'T II-i( ~~~m;:.tvr Part II-B Prim'lry Census Abstract
"IT'TIU ~mm~ Part III General Economic Tables
"IT'TIV ~tJ;r4~~~ Part IV S::>cial and Cultural Tables
"IT'TV ~') ~fVrl.1T • Part V Migration Tables
'fTlTVI ~~ Part VI Fertility Table~
~rlT VII lAiT'it qar ~l!IiRf ~ tn:: ~fQrrt Part VII Tables on Hou;es and Disabled Populatioll 1{llT VIn ~~~ Part VIII Household Tables \1TlT IX ~~~"'~'"A'~ltn::~~ Part IX Sp.:cial Tables on Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes \1TlT X-~X... ¥ fit ;:prif I!i1' ~ fttnt 'Part X-B Survey Reports on Szlectcd Towns
\1TlT X~ "!if It{ IJt;ij 1(>') ~ ftq\t PartX-C Survey Reports on Selected Villages Y1Tt1 Xl ~ ~ m 1:!;f tr2~ ;;nflr ~ ~ 'f;r;;rmr 1fT flriIf f15f1fr.r Part XI Ethnographic notes and Special Studies on SchedUled Castes and SchcduJ,d TI il:'cs \1TlT-XII Part XII CeJ'lSUS A tJas if!n:-J 1982 IfiT ~~ ~~~ it;~1I'PffiA; ~ ~ Paper I of 1982 Primary Census Ab,tract for S;;heduled Ct\stcs and Scheduled Tribes
~~ ~;m:: it; ~ ! State GovermatDt Publications
'lfII'-XIII tr. 6'IT m. ~ ~ 45 mr Ifi't ~ ~ ~ Part XTII A & B Di.. trict Censu. Handbook f~r each of the 45 districts in the State. (qylf ~ ~ ~ C'I1iT srrqflRi' ~ 'fl"tlW) ~ (Village and Town Direetor)' and Primary Census Abstract)
(i)
f~~~,\, cONTE N,TS
~~. PAGE No
SHifofi1R vi FOREWORI)
SffiIAiIT vii PREFACE ij'~TlfiT W"T ~i'it of Abbreviations xi
"'~I ~ Chapter J Introduc tory 1
~Sl(ll(' II ~~
Cnpt~r III P;lysi:al and Location Aspect 10-21 {jSl(ll('IV ro;frlr fif{jSl(ll(' VI ammf9'G ;r~T ~ li" ;wrfi:ifi ~ ~;:lf WOIlfriT C:lapt.::r VI Civk and other Am~nities in Notified Slums 29-33
'l6!:l1lf VII ~, m«ifi, 11il"~ Q,Ci ~ ~if CilapterVn Medical, Educational, Recreational and Cultural Amenitiu 34-37
~~ vln ~, ~, ~Fr ~ar ~'fiR Chapter V:lIl Trade, Commerce. Industry and Bankini 38-60
Chapter IX Primary Census Abstract 61-62
f.r«or Statements 63-399
m<:ur I 5T~~ ~ ,r.l~ St.a.t.cm.:nt I Status and Growth History 64-115
~1!f II ~ lfiT 'II'rfuifi om ~~, 1979 Statement II Physical Aspects and Location of towns, 1979 116-145
~1!f III "1'I(qlf~"" f.ffi, 1978-79" Statement III Municipal Financ~. 1978·79 147-189
~.lV "1llfRifi ~ct ~ ~if Statclll;:nt IV Civic and other Amenities . 191-245
~ IV~ ~ ~ iI'fuI;ff it "1T"1'f f.rcr(iiI) (iv)
~VI ~;~I~"\1r12;~~ srrllffir;!; ~ mmr Townwbe Primary Census Abstract . 400-437
q~ Appendices 439-476
~~I qOI'lf;qI'i~I( ;:pRf ~ ~ App~ndiK I Location of Towns arrangeci in alphabetical order 439-445
~II \lR~ 3fr~ ~~~ ~ (1981) App~ndiK II Towns arrang.,I according to population size (1981) 446-452
~III ~ qfll;f( (1981) ~ ~ ~;:pI'( , ApPilndiK UI Towns arranged districtwhe according to pcpulatiol' l>ize (1981) 453-460
v~~ IV ~~~iflT(~~ Apl'"niiK IV Town~ showillJ outgrowths with population 461-465
~~V '(TVIf if ~ it m'N ~ Ap~=nJiK V Places of Tourist interest in the towns of the State 466-476
~ Maps 477-555 - _------....:.. ------_._-
IM'f~ TOWN DIRECTORX
------
(v) ;N 197 1 ~ ~ ~ SI'Ii'1lFI1 ~ >.:t.1!Im it; ~ ri am: ,,~ ~I:ll ~~ ~ \JIORl~T iP' ~ ;;fif 'Uil:r it Jf1rnf ;mT it; m it ,_-.r ~~ it; ~Rr it; ~ it ~ ~ ~ 1971 ltlT ;:pn: f.rifiIrifiT >.:t.l!RT it; ~-7 1!IT ~ 1m: -m'If ~ om: m~ ~ ~ ~ wIT, 1971 l!ft" ~ ~ ~lfT ~ , ;;p;ffN;~;r. ~ifj"f" it ~lTr ~ ~:q!f ~ 11ft ~T ;:pn: f.:rffir.:1'.11<1'1 ~ ;:pn:f.Rf!Il"IiT~fiI,tiiQ'" ~ ~ ~ it; ~, tRt ~ it ;rt lfT ~ ~ ~ iRraft l!ft" @1ft fur ~ 1 9 7 1 lIlT >.:t. tiI'<1'T SflIi1ftRr lift tit v.ft, 'liT 1¥. iTiff.t it; ft;rl1; ~~ ~ I ~,~ ~ ~ Q'fr ~ if'lf.t it; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ffl<: 31"1<: ~ W{ ~~, ~ ~ 'liT ~ it ~ 3. o.fT it;. -aT. ~, f.mr;j;, ~ m it; f.riQlOf it P..TT gt!;,1:!;'fi'~~it;~,~~~~ ~ .. "",q"1 aft. q'r. fa1, mNifi,~ Q'fr ~ mm . it o.fT ~. !ft. ~, ~ am lIlT ~ ~ I ~ 'lftlit:;r;rr if 1it1J'~;r ~ 'GlfI'fifi ~ ~ ~ ~ , m ClfT'm:, ~, ~ am ~~~~);flil~~~, ~fifitr ~ mfi:" it; ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ m:, f.r.:I"1!fflT 1Ift;:pn: ~ffiT it ~ f.r;lt ~:a-m- sr(vi) FOREWORD
Under the 1971 Census series publications, for data contained therein is amenable to a trend an the first time a state level town directory volume alaysis. The Statement VII of 1971 series of town was brought out as a source of basic data in respect directory relating to population by religion and sche of all ~he towns in the state. The town directory duled castes and scheduled tribes has bcen dropped volume 01 1971 series proved useful to the plan as its compilation is expected to take time. A new ners, administrators, research workers, academicians statement IV-A, howe,·er, endeavours to provide and others and. therefore. the state level town direc information on civic and other amenities in slums tory based all the 19""81 census is also propo":~ to in Class-I and Class-II towns. It i" hoped that this be publish(.d. The basic fraine of the tOWl. directory information will be useful for undertakin¥ new or of tt.e 1981 series remains more or less the same strengthcning the existing basic civk serVIces in the as in the ca~e of the 1971 serie... However, a few slums to meet one of the requirement, of the Mini modifications and innovations have been made to mum N~ed5 Programme. make it n.ore informative and useful. It is with ihis objective in ,iew that, besides a new statement a 3. The data for the town directory ha'S been com . detailed analytical note supported by a numbe~ of piled in the Census Directorate by Shri O. P. Tiwari, Investigator under the direction of Shri K.C. Dubey, inset tables based on data on th,~ primary census abstracts and infrastructure have been aJded. the Director of Census Operation'S Madhya Pradesh. His team of devoted workers led by Shri Ram Singh Deputy Director of Census Operations worked . 2. The volume is di'ided into two sections. Sec painstakingly for compilation of the volume. The tion A presents an analytical note, the town direct !ask of planning, .designing and coordination of pro ory covering 7 statements, to\Vn-wh~ primary cen Jcct has been Cl!rne..:l out by Dr. Na~. Deputv Regis sus abstract and a few appendices. Section B c.on rar General (Social Studies) of my Office. Dr. B.K. tains a number of important maps, including maps Roy. Deputy Registrar General (MAP), provided on land use pattern. Statements I to VI of the town the technical I!uidance in the preparation of the dir~tory p~ovide a wide range of demographic, eco maps. The draft manuscripts compiled in the Cen... nomIC, SOCIal and cultural data in respect of each sus Directorate have been 'lcrutinised in the Social town. These cover information on the location of Studies Division at the headquarters by Shri S.P. town~, civic admi~i~tration status, growth history, Jain Investigator under the able guidance of Shd phYSIcal aspec!s, CIVIC an~ other amenities, munioipal M.M. Dua, Senior Research Officer. I avail of this finances, medical, educatIOnal, recreaticnal and cul opportunitv to thank all my colleagues who ~onrri tural amenities besides trade, commerce industry' buted to this project. a!ld banking institutions, etc. These state~ents are .broa..:lly comp~~able to similar statements incluiled New Delhi, P. PADMANABHA, In the town dIrectory of the 1971 series and the 2 September, 1983. Rcgistrar General. India
(VI) 1 RGI/86-2 19 71 ~ ~ if J:I1!n1' iln: ~ ~ ~ ~ II. ~ ~ q;li l'!1rU 1 f.:rf1;rn- ~ ifiT 31f"Ji!'i" ~ ~ I . ~ ~ it ~V.~,~,~~~~I fire!:a fetqqfr ~it ~ ~lqQqifldi ~ wrm ~ ~ I ~ ~ 'flTi(!f it; ,if; f~ VI ~, ~, ~ n;T ~ ~ I ~(f: l.Ti:[ fzt'l"uIT fcrv~i(; Q If>T ~ I 5 ~ m ~ ~ t:;;IT (I) q-aj~ ~ ifiT ~1RW~~1 . ~ (2) ~ iii ~ ~ 'lfr ~ (3) ~ ,~ ~ ~ 4't t:f'f. ;sIT. ~'{r;;r, ..~~, ~ ~1~if~;it~rrtJ;ii'l:("~a'4T~ ~ ~ it '1iin:: ttfu11f f'filIT ~ I ~ ~ 'fiT ~ ~ 'fiT ~ rn ifiT ~~ ~ 52 ~ ~t . ~,rn :q- ~ qf<1iI41t% ~ fm if ~ t:f'f. an-.' ~{:f, 1ft cIT ~ ~ I ~ it if ~ m:fIrIlft ~ it ~ 31 ~ . ~ ~''fiT mN ~ W ~'I it·~·~;fi-llfu ~ ~, 01ITflr ~ ~ ~ ;;q.'fITlft if ~ ~ 3f(f; ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ if ~ ~ if >4't"Ulf fill: -a't~, .~ 'tIT ~ 52 trifi ~ ~ ~ I ,.ft AuT ~J ~ f.mr'fi, ~ ~ aft, oft. t:"f~ ~, a'4T ~~ ~ 'fi11f ~ ~ :"~"'lf(41 if '1\01<: ~ fif;trr ~ I dWtijj;fl'l ~ fit; ~ ~ if ;rnJi!I ~ 'it (~if; tmt iI't ~ ~ ;roFm SMltr if ~ m ili. ~.~, qfuso 'U\RT it ftvrn WIfr 'f1fif il\'t ~~ 'lIlIT 'fl': ~ ~ ~, ~it;~if;mT~~~~lit~ ~~ iff.!;~I~~~GI)~~~f'li"if1T'{ ~ *~~ ~ I~ Wift i1i'Sl~ij;fiRr~~!Iit~ 'fiT 1IT1f;;IT if ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ~ ij't-'Ifi(~l ( ~ oft. ~'IT, m 1Z'i. an-. i'fTIT, '3t(' ;m: I ~ ft;,~. ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ (~ ~lf.'T 'SI'IITlT) l!rr ~ m If'( ~ ~ sm'1" rn ij; ft;rt:!; ~!J'Ii" m;:rrU ~ I ~ ~ (VII) PREFACE
It was in tne Census of 1971 that a compilation An effort has also been made to make this publi of directory of the towns of the State was br0'!lght cation interesting and more meaningful by including out as an independent Volume for the first time. 42 land use maps in respect of Class I and Class II This was in addition to the District Census Hand towns. As in 1971, the State Town Directory Volume book in which data of every town in a district is will include land use pattern in respect of all Class given as also of villages. This .publication received I and Class II towns. This land use pattern maps immediate and interested attentIcn from the data covers 30 district headquarters and 12 other towns users. It has, therefore, been considered useful to whiCh come in the cla,ss I and ciass II size class. continue this compilation in tbe present Census also. While scanning through the data, it became ap parent that the field agencies perhaps could not There are 7 Statements in thi" Volume. These understand the real import of 'lome terms. Examples are :- would be found in the number of stadia, auditoria Statement I--Status and Growth History. and places of tourist interest reported by them. It is difficult to introduce personal knowledge in all Statement II-Physical Aspects and Location of cases and so the data is being presented in whatever towns. shape it has been reeeh-ed. Statement III-Municipal Finallce---1978-1979. A small write up has also been given just by way Statement IV-Civic and Other Amenities. of introducing the respective tables. It is considered that a more detailed and more analytical write up Statemenu IV A-Civic and Other Amenities in would have been definitely more useful. Census has Notified Slums. its own limitations in respect of time particularly Statement V-Medical, Educational, Recreational for a bird of passage like me. It was, therefore, and Cultural Facilities. never intended to go in for a probing and detailed write up and it is being left to scholars on urbaniza Statement VI-Trade, Commerce, Industry and ation, urban demography and urban suciology to Banking. undertake a really scholarly analysis and interpreta tion of this very useful data on urbanisation. The In addition to this the Primary Census write up herein presented is just a sketchy analyti Abstract of the town is also given. 5 Appendices cal note. have also been presented which show (1) Loca tion of towns arranged in alphabetical order (II) My colleagues Shri M.L. Sharma, Deputy Direct Towns arranged according to population size (Ill) or of Census Operations, Shri M.G. Mohril, Assist towns arranged districtwise according to population ant Director of Census Operations have worked size, (IV) towns showin~ their ~utgrowth with poP.u hard in the presentation of the mapuscript. Shri lation and (V) appendIx showmg places of tounst M.G. Mohril, Assistant Director has been particul interest in the towns. As many as 52 inset tables arly helpful in analysis of the data and in drafting are being provided with a view to facilitate the an the write-up. lowe a great deal of debt to them. In alysis of data contained in the tables and to high addition Shri Ram Singh, Deputy Director, Shri light the urbanization and other trends. In fact Vidyasagar, Assistant Director an.d Shri O.P. Tiwari, these inset tables are only 31 in number. However, Tabulation Officer and the team working under some of the inset tables have more than one part them have worked hard in ~he compilation of the and the total Le., tables with their parts raises the . number of inset tab1es to 52. . statements. Maps have been prepare,J in the carto graphic section of my office under the guidance of Shri KM. Dhawle, Senior Geographer. To each one It may be remembered that the data in this of them I am grateful. But for their efforts it would Volume is being presented for all the towns in the not have been possible to bring out this Volume in State arranged in alphabetical order for the State as this shape. . ;.. ~. ; a whole and not districtwise. The other point which may be kept in view is that whereas in the town I am extremely grateful to Shri P. P oldman abba, directory included in the District Censu.> HandbOOk, our Registrar General, and Shri N.G. Nag. Deputy, the Primary Census Abstra~t provide,> wardwise Registrar General (Social Studies) for giving us data in respect of each town, this Volume provides valuable guidance from time to time. data in respect of the towns as a whole and not ward wise. K. C. DUBEY,
(VII)
W'i' Ifi' SECTION A
f_~ f~ ~ ~ f.rifmir f~ ADalytical Note aDd Town Diredory Statements ---_.::_--:___- ...::==-_. -===
(LX)
;IfII"{' m~ if ~ ~al IIil ~ LIST OF o\BBREVIATIONS USED IN THE TOWN DIRECTORY
,Tlfft" $I' ITTfrlf tri srf~ I. Ci~ltl 4d,n;"il/rlllicl/1 SUlt".t
~~ 0) hI 11i.:ip11 Gnp rali!)n M. Corp
"'1 (11 I fq:jifil (ii) Mllli-;iJlll C lnl'1littee MC ~~ (iii) 8.i ltO'lrnt BJlucl CB ~~~ (i ... ) 'htilb I £r.;'1 Clmrnittee lIoiAC l1llf ~ (v) Gnm Panchayat GP
~;rn: '(vi) C~'ls~n T(.'wa CT f.rn Iffir mmr m~ \ ( .. ii) Sp};i!t! A.m. D.=ve!opment Authorit)' \ SAD A. I'ITl1'ft.. ~ "II' !f2I'YT~ 2. Civ;,. and Otller Amellitie\ men: (i) Sewe-r s ~ mftnrt (ii) Open Surface 'Drain OSD ~~ (iii) B.:n Surface Drain BSO ~~ (iv) Sylk Drains ·SO ~rmr (v) Cess POOl! Method CD ~n (vi) Pit Svstem Pt fiR'll: (vii) Head LllI\ds Hl:. it~. (xi) Sewera~'- s
..3. ""'.Drinking Water-, SII]1p/V ~~1IPr (i) Tu!)e well water/Hand plomp TW
(xi) (xii)
iffr 'liT qy;ft (ii) Tap Water T' ~tt ~ IfTift (iii) Well Wat.,r W ~ 'liT qrrrr (iv) Ta'1k Water TK m (v) OVl}rhead Tank OHT. ~ (vi) S.:rvi;e. reRervf'ir SR iIit (~ii) Riv:.r inliltrati an Gallery fG \ am:;for ~ ~ (viii) B)re well PUmping ~Y~lem OWP m~ (ix) Pressure Tank pr r.fimn ~al 4. M~di"Ql
~.
(i) Hospit:d H mmrtT; (ii) Dispensary Q ~fi (iii) H~llth Centre He qft;m: ~" (iv) Fami!y Planning Centre Fe tt.ir.~ (v) T.B. CIi'1ic TB- ;rilm ~ (vi) NurSll"jf Home NH
~ (vii) Others () ftm~ 5. 'Edllcotiono I IItIf.. tli+l4~ (i) Arts CoJlege At ¥l~fc"iII+14 f.nn;r (ii) Science College S >t~f.. 'Ci 1+14 iIi+IT 11;1(' mrr.r (iii) Arts and St;ience College AS ¥lI'lOIAtll+l4 'I!;1t ~ (iv) Commerce College C tjiiIA'I+l4~ I!;;f ~ (v) Arts and Collll~rce College AC 11{IA"I+l4~, fcmr.r ~ ~ (vi) Arts, Commerce & Science Collell; ASC ¥l~fiI" I~-f.ml (vii) Law College L "UTt~ (viii) ShOlt Hand SH (xiii)
~~~ (Ix) Typo wntina' ri~~m"~ (x) Sharthan(: & Type writing l!hType
~,,~ 6. Communication,
~~ PH. (i) P~CC3 RQad
~~ (ii) Kuccli'a'Ruad KR ,,;tmpr, 8fIftr ~ 7. Re(:reati3nal tJlld Cultu,Dl ~~ (i) Public LibIiUY PI. 1fi'iAIiI'If (ii) Road ing R. Jom 1\8.
1 llGllll6--3 .... 1
1': l "f~,IJ"1[;H f"'lm !liT m{ ~ If,tl( tmf\'tIr ttor ~It 1. 6 I'fIR ~'-'!! «m .'f.T ffi·qt'!i~ lfi'UI'T iff'll t! f!'Ii ~?r, ~'1T~ ItfQl ~dt ili "'.%I' d'll: ~~ it. m ;rTel' 11;'Ii ~"'r l£h:.'IfI'QT ;;rf ~m- ~ f~1 (~) f.. f m"q- ~ if>' ifl'R ~~ ~ ~ ~ ;;W1l' crr~'-I ¢r 10m ij; iff!!' ~ STq;f iii) lfi ~i'lff ~ ~ Gil m;m ~, t;q; ":;ilimf~'l:f '!fir 'T.TiI' ;>;rtl' ~ I 1fr ~t 'I:l"I'iQT i I "f;;i'fr ~ ~ ;;jTUfil"tl' ~mnm if !Wfr>;r fl;rfq;rraT t 'l;I'T~ iq~ (~) 11,'iP ;:rr;;: f~"r <1IrTm1: 'l(l~:_ ~ ~"{ I't';fT:t !liT ,r.::r 'f.T"{Gf aT ~ lI'~ "O'inf if if~~ ~ (if~ ~) 'liT fCil'~ 1. 7 ;;:r~ <€'t iflf'i; fififu;f,r ~ if'l"U, ;;fl' fT!'fP~ 1::IJ 'fiT ~, ~ 'i'(Ij~ ~ 1.JOiTq ltT (i) 5000'9'..'ifOl{ :or;;~ 1f ~ ~;r: ~ ~ lIi'Ilfll'Rl cni'r Iffif I tT!iT ~ I ~~ it m'WI'furr ~'IiT'; 'I; f'l'l'W ~ G ifl'1it it; lfT« ~T (1 0 0 0 srf:.=r q'1f 1fn;r) I ~ 0l:ITW 1 ,5 1961 Q;'f.T!:/ '17~i 'tTl" 'fiT ;rfd' lI"rnt' "'W ~, ~ f'f1f~ "tR7T U' ~ "f'rriq'T 'f1T ~ ITr '3j';;,f1I1"'Frii ij;-f<'fq 75 lI'f..9':mFr'hrr ~ lIf ~ I it?r iIT,~,lI'!fa crr~ ;;rrU iii lI1i'~ it ~ ifflri!' it; -'r-;;n"1lT if ~ ~, ;rq. 1981 'r it ~ f;;!:11'~ m-.r f.-m fl; if arr~.* ~ffi' ~, W'fl1 ~ ;;If'"( ;;ift ~', il; ;:mr ili ;rWr ~ i{ ~9'fCff..ro 'lfq- ..,h: >iir[;;: l1JI".\'1:: f;f1 CHAPTER-I INTRODUCTION
. 1.1 One of the very first items or work that a URBAN AGGLOMERATION Census Director has. to undertake is the demarcation of p~aces as rural and urban. In all the Censuses 1.6 Apart from town/city the 1971 concept of urban throughout the world, Census data are presented for agg1omeraiion is also adopted for tne 1981 Census. rural and urban areas separately and Indian Census Very often large railway colonies, University cam is no exception. The distinction between J;ural and puses, port areas, military camps, etc. come up· out urban is not yet amellable to a single defination side the statutory limits of the city or town but ad which would b;: applicable to all countries. joining it. Such ureas may 110t by themselves qualify to be treated as towns but if they form a continuous 1.2 111ere can be many angles to look at the ques spread with the town, they are outgrowth~; ()f the tion of demarcating area' as urbC\ll. One could be town and d.!serve to be treated as urban. Such towns the demographic consideration. The other view could together with their outgrowths have· been treated as be to take the level of infrastructural development in one urban unit and callyd 'urban agglomeration'. An an ar~a in addition to demographic characteristics. llrban agglomeration may constitute. This consideration is rather difficult in application (a) A city with continuous outgrowth (the part uniformally all over the country firstly, because of the 'of outgrowth being outside the statutory complexity of the Indian situation and regional varia limits but falling within the boundaries of tion in the level of infrastructural facilities and the adjoining village or villages; secondly because application of such a test neces sarily involves expertise: Also, this test requires time (b) One town with similar outgrowths or two for study. Frankly speaking, such pleasurable pur or more adjoining towns with their out suits are unfortunately not in the lot of Census growths as in (a); or takers in our country. (c) A city and one or more adjoining towns wltn 1.3 The defination of an urban unit that j'as been the o~tgrowths all of which form a' con adopted in this Census is· the same as that adopted tinuous spread: in 1971 an.d th~ basic reason to retain the old defina 1.7 The State Town Directory covers all the towns, tion was to have a meaningful comparison with the the Statutorily notified as well as non-municipal or data of earlier Censuses and to provide the basis for Census toWns. There are 327 such towns in the analysis of trends of urbanisation in the State. State in this census. The amenities and other aspectH 1.4 .According to the defiQation adopted, urban are being presented in codes with a view to save space units at the present Census are :- which are being explained in the beginning of this Directory. It may be useful to remember that where (a) All places with a municipaHty, cOiporation an urban agglomeration includes two or more· inde or cantonment board or notified town area; pendent towns. t..lte names of the town constituting the urbun agglomeration have been indicated in thb :b) All other places which satisfied the follow alphabetical arrangements of towns within the State ~ng criteria: irrespective of whether they form agglomeration or not. Their names hav'e been repeated in the alpha (i) A minimum population of 5,000; betical order under the name of the agglomeration (ii) At least 75 per cent of the male working which naturally is named after the name of the main population engaged in non-agricultural town of the agglomeration. The particulars of the pursuits; and . . · constituent units of the agglomeration have not been furnished where they occur separately Dnd in such (iii) A q,ensity of population of at least 400 · ~ses. suitable e;xplanation has been provided by the per km.2 (1,000 per square 'mile). · SIde of the name of the town. .. '1.5 The urban. criterion of 1981 varies slightly 1.8. Some towns have outgrowths Which (io not honi that of 1961 and 1971 Censuses in· that the qualify to be tr~ated as town. hence as .,uch the parti- . males' working in activities such as fishin~, logging, CUhlr!;" for such outgrowths will nor be separately avail etc. were treated as engaged in nen-agricultural acti able. However, appendix IV shows the population of vity. and therefore, contributed to the 75· per cent. . the core town and populatiOn of outgrowths, separa- criterion in 1961 and 1971 Censllses, whereas in the · tely ..In the cas~ 9f towns haviT'lg such outgrowths an 1981 .Census these activities are t:-eated ·as on per as!erlS~ mark would be .. fO~d placed against their _with cultivation and Jlgricultural labour for the pur- · n~me . III the body of the statement to indicate that pose of this criterion.' . they have outgrowths whiCh are not sepante towns. 1 11lII1Itn
2. 1 ~ ~ if ~ it; 'Iflrfj lIfr ~ tt~I to .n ¥'lIT if II'rIf !l'flr if ..~ 11ft ~ ------_._-_. ------._------_.. __ ._---_._--_ .. _- ----._----_... __ ---_._ _._-----,-_._----ilII'~ ~ srftmr f;rI1p;mr
2 3 4 5 6 ------_._------_._---_._-_._-_I ... -----_. __ .-_._--_.--_._-- 1901 16,860,768 15,402,723 1,458,045 19.11 19,440,965 18,141,958 + 17. 78 1,299,007 + 10. 91 1921 19,171,750 17,731,538 -2.26 1,440,212 + 10.87 1931 21,355,657 19,583,786 + 10. 45 1,771,871 + 23. 03 1941 23,990,608 21,637,831 + 10. 49 2,352,777 +32.78 1951 ::8,071,637 22,938,700 +8.01 3,132,937 + 33.16 1961 32,373,408 27,745,174 +20.95 4,627,234 + 47. 70 1971 41,654,119 34,869,352 + 25. 68 6,784,767 + 46.63 1981 52, 178t844 41,592,385 + 19.28 10,586,459 + 56.09 ---_.. _------._--
.---- .. - "------_._------. ---- ~ ---_. __ --- ~"Oi' ._--....
~ srfa1Rr ~ 7 8 9 10 11
238,396,3" 212,544,454 25,851,873 212,093,390 226,151,757 +6.40 25,941,633 +0.3. 211,321,213 223,235,048 -1.29 28,088,167 +8.27 2711,977,13' 245,5:U,241 +9.98 33.455,989 + 19.12 318,660,880 274,507,283 + 11. 81 44,153,297 +31. 97 381,081,.,.0 298,844,381 +8.79 62,443,709 +41. 42 439.234,711 360,.298,168 +0.64 78,936,603 + 26.11 141,168,812 439,045,675 21.18 10,911,397 . +38.23 8l1li,184,6&2 125,457,355 19.68 159,737,357 +46.39
1 CHAPTER II
STATUS AND GROWIH mSTO~Y 2.1 In thb chapter It is proposed to discuss the 2.3 Economic ·history of a State reveals a close re status and growth history of towns in the State. It lationship between industrialization and urbanization is hoped that the study will help in having some idea because modem large-scale industries can not develop about the degree and pace of urbanization in Madhya unless the necessary infrastructure is· available. This Pradesh. is only possible in uroan centres and therefore, it may even be said tbat it is not possible to have indus 2.2 EConomic development of t:cgion, State or a trialisation without urbanisation. 'country is associated with the growth of urbanisation. In other words, an increasing level of urbanisation is 2.4 The growth of urbanisation iri Madhya Pradesh an important index of industrialisation or over-all "'ill be discemibk by a perusal of th~ inset tables economic development. Urbanisation facilitates the which are given in this chapter. To begin with, we may process of modernization, the spread of scierrce and have a lOOK at the growth of urban population in the of the attitude of economic rationality. It also brings State vis-a-vis India as a whole; this is shown in the about sociological transformation. foUowing tabl~ : TABLE 1 GROWTH OF POPULATION IN MADHYA PRADESH IN RELATION TO THE COUNTRY
STATE
Census year Total. PopulatiOn RURAL URBAN
Population Decadal percentage Total variation Population 1 2 3 4 5
1901 16,860,768 15,402,723 1,458,045 1911 19,440,965 18,141,958 +17.78 1,299,007 1921 19.171,750 17,73].538 -12.26 ],440,212 1931 21,355,657 19,583,786 +10.45 1.771,871 1941 23,990,608 21.637,831 +10.49 2,352,777 1951 26.071,637 22,938,700 + 6.01 3,132,937 1961 32,372,408 27.745,174 +20.95 4.627,234 1971 41,654,119 34.869,352 +25.68 6,784,767 1981 52,178.844 41.592,385 +19.28 10,586.459
ALL INDIA _-.. __ 0-"-- __ Total RURAL URBAN ])ecadal percentage Population population Dccadal percentage Population Decadal percentage variation variation variation
6 7 8 9 10 ·11 238,396,327 212,544,454 25,851,873 _10.91 252,093.390 226,151,751 . +6.40 25,941,633 +0.35 ·,10.87 251,32],213 223,235,046 .1.29 28,086.167 +8.27 +23.03 278,977,238 245,52] .249 +9.98 33.455,989 +19.12 +32.78 318,660,580 274,507,283 +11.81 44,153,297 +31.97 +33.16 361.088,090 298,644,381 +8.79 62,443.709 +41.42 +41.70 439,234,771 360,298,168 +0.64 78,93i:i,603 +26.14 +46.63 548.159,652 439,045.675 21.86 10,911,397 +38.23 +56.03 685,184.692 525,457,355 19.68 159,727,357 +46.39
2 2. 5 ~ rnafr III an ~ f'fi Vl1frIrr q;t « m t 2. 9 ~ it; srror ~ m~ ~cf ifTq!f ~f;j;rr 'lilu::irll" ~ ~ lfiT ~~ t:t't 'lTTW '1>i ;r;rn'li!fT ~) srf«~~;rr lSi srfmm ffIWaT ;tfr mvIt 1 !J lI'tfl' if; \TI;ft~ ({it if4f~!f ,ir-hililfr 'fir 'nrr. 1971 83.7. S8. 1 16.3 19.9 fi'{ii ,-fJr 'lIiq"~ 25. GS 'C{f -15.63 :!IT 1 1971-31· if <:i1T ~r 1981 79.7 76.7 20.3 23.3 mqrlll o;: ~roli ;;r::r;fliTr ~ 2: 12 m~uft if. 2 Ii!f -,;. it ;r:TIi "(ill Itt 'iT wr t'r ;r1Tit1f ;;r;r~'ll ifil srfd'n 1nThl t I ~ tfr. 1971 ij"Ii' ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1981 itll'~ ~ ~lJ 1fi1f ~ 'If ~ ~ 1 0 ~ ir it -.------..--.~-_----.-----.-.--- .. -- "l'rot it ~ f.... ifirT 46. 39 ~ 1I".-fifi q;1 srh it Uli) J"I' ";fr::fnr 1IfEr qfir~ 'f"r qlf 56. 03 ~lTTf,~p f.... m llTf( ~ I "if 1l:'r-lHlT 1",' ~';;;rfri 11"'1' ~ tfta trfi:r Nnr<:TT '*" ~ 'I>'t lir~ fr ~:r 'fi"~ '~~ II <:rf~ il";ft 'R~ ",,.orr 'fir lTld'lT:f W ~ w m~sK!!I if ;f.rthr fi:~fif 'fi'l''IHa" ~ "111,'1" ~ c.nlf;" I --~------... -.---.------2 3 4 2. 8 fcImr ;J ~ Cflt it ifrrU ilft Uli'i!' ~.~ ~ ~mfonr ._------srmmr f1F:m qfirifi ~ lIT ;;rr~m I ~~ f;rl'i{ mW if InTfllT '--"--' 'lm:i1I' 685,184,692 159,727,357 23.31 'FlIT t :- Jf~f'!i~ 62.784,171 21,933,534 35.03
i1I'TfifOl'il"ll 48,408,017 15,931. 313 3 !. J j ;rroilftum ;:rrr~l 11\'1' qi'il tflI'mI. 34,085,793 10.501.553' 31. 1') it ,f~ Iff 'li1IT ~~ 37,135,714 10,729,60S 21 ..'1) 2. 3 .q'lUiJ 16,788,915 4,647,757 27.68 I 1901 121 q~;flt tlmr 54,580,641 14.4JS,721 23.41 1911 118 --3 .Jf~ 1,420,953 375,460 23.42 1921 122 '+4 . vtasmr 53,549,673 12,487,576 23.32 1931 147 +25 ~~ 12,922,618 3,827,:187 21. 8S 1941 174 +27 5.987,389 1,260,403 1951 202 +28 '~lf~ 21. 05 191U 219 +17 .~ 34,261;862 7,210,508 21. 05 1971 250 + 31 1f51I'm 52,118,844 10,56S,459 2 J. 29 1911 327 + 77 m 25,453,680 4,771,275 18.74 ._-----_ 3
2.S It. wJlI be seen nom the abQ\'~ table that the 2.9 It is not proposed to discuss table number 1 in proportion of rural and urban population t,? tot.:tl as much detail. as to cover the decadal percentage population in Madhya Prade:;h and India dupng the variation of·the rural ~d urban components since the last 8 decades is as below : beginning of this century. This aspect may better be " TABLE I-A covered by more competent workers who will also Census year Proportion of ;ural and urban population have longer time at their disposal. We may confine in M.P. and India ours~lves to a period of last 30 years. RURAL URBAN 2.10 The decadal percentage variation shows a Madhya India Madhya India rather erratic '6ehaviour in the 'sense that it is not Pradesh Pradesh directly correlated with the number of towns added 1901 91.4 69.2 8.6 10.8 in a' certain census year. What is ,perhaps more likely 1911 93.3 89.7 6.7 10.3 to a combination of two or more factors like the size 1921 92.5 88.8 7.5 11.2 of the 'New' population !lidded to urban migration 1931 91.7 !.l8.0 8.3 12.0 etc. ' . 1941 90.2 86.1 9.8 13.9 1951 88.0 82.7 12.0 17.3 ,1961 85.7 82.0 14.3 18.0 2.11 In the decade 1951-61 the uroan decadal 1971 83.7 88.1 16.3 19.9 percentage variation was +47;70. The number of new 1981 79.7 76.7 20.3 23.3 towns added in 1961 to those of 1951 was 17. In , .. '_.,-- ,_._-'_- ,,-.'------, ,-'--_._-- -_ ----- 1971 thIrty-one towns were added to the 1961 num 2.6' It will be immediately observed from this that ber but the decadalvariation was only 46.63 i.e. 1.07 l\·1adhya Pradesh is less urbanised than India as a points less. In the decade, 1961--7J the decenial whole. Speaking very crudely, till about 1941 Madhya growth of rural and urban population of Madhya Pradesh was more than 40 years behind the country Pradesh was 25.68 and 46.63 respectively, the 1971- as far as the proportion of urban populati~n to total 81 deceniiil growth faTe of the rural and urban popu population was concerned. The gulf WR5. btldged very lation of the State is 19.28 and 56.03 respectively. fast in the decade 19'41-51 and the gap was brought Thus, the growth rate of rural population has fall~n by down to twenty years. That is to say, Madhya Pra !l.4. ~hereas the growth rate of urban population has desh had an urban component in 1951 equal to the Increased by 9.40. In other words the rate of dec all India urban' component of 1931. This gap was rease of the decadal variation of rural popUlation has maintained till 1971 but in 1981 it seems to have been 24.92 per cent whereas the rate of increa<:e of been much narrowed down and has come to about the decadaI percentage v'ariation for urban popUlation ten years. Madhya Pradesh is today about ten years for the same. period has been by 20.15 per cent. behind India as a whole in the urban component in its population. 2.12 .Ta~le No.2 shows the proportion of urban populatIon .]n each State. and Union territory arranged 2.7 The above remarks can be appreciated better by I? descendIng order of percentages of urban popula- a look at' the decadal percentage variation of the ur tIon. ' ban po?ulation in Madhya Pradesh and all India. Since 1961 Madhya PradeSh is continuously register TABU! No.:2 ing larger, decadal variation in the 1l,rban, population } roportion 0/ Urban Population in each State than all India. In the dec'ade 1971.;_81 the decadal (Arranged in descending order of percentage~ of urban percentage variation in all India has been 46.39 poDulation) whereas Madhya Pradesh has speeded faster and has - -jndia/Sfatr;---- -TOi8i'-~ban registered the decadal percentage variation, of 56.03. Percentage This greater speed in urbanization is slowly filling population population of urban the gap and if it is maintained, the state will have population an urban complexion similar to that displayed by all to total India. population '----~-- 2 3 4 , 2.8 The decadal percentage variation will be dear - iNDIA--:------·68S,184,692 ]S9,727,357' --.. by an al'praisal of the number of towns at the various 23.31 census year. This is shown in the table below :- I. Mabarashtra 62,784,171 21,993,S94 TABLE I-B 2. Tamil Nadu 35.03 4~.408,O17 , 5,951,875 32;95 ----, ----.--:~-:------J. Gujarat 34,085,799 Census year Number Increase 10,601,653 31.10 4. Kamatak 37,135,714 of Or decrea'e 10,729,606 28.89 towns in the 5. Punjab 16,788,9IS 4,647,757, 27.68 number 6. West Bengal 54,580,647 of towns' 14,446,721 76,47 1: Maoipur 1,420,953, 37S.460 ' 26.42 1901 121 8. A'ndhra Prade~h S3.S49,673 1911 118 _:l 12,487,576 23.32 9. Haryana . 12,922,618 1921 122 +4 3,827.387 21.88 ]9J] 147 +2S 10. Jammu & Kash- 1941 174 +27 mir 5,987,389 1,260,403 195"1 21. OS "202 +28 11. Rajasthan . 34,261,862 7,21(),508, 19M 219 +17 12. Madhya Praclesh 21.05 1971 250 +31 52,178,844 10,586,459' , ·20.29 1981 ..... '27, 13. Kerala 25,453,680 ,+77 .. , .•... "-,_,,,_ 4,771,,275 74 .. - ---_._---_ ------_------.18 .. --_ _------_ .. _------4
-- .---~--- -_.. ------_" - ----_._ ----- J 3 ------2. 3 irffI~ 1,335,819 241,333 18.07 3. ~ ('1'.,. 0) J 1,453 ~ .!f~ 110,862,013 19,899,11 5 17.95 4. q'~:(lf .,. Iff"") 5,860 fuf.n:1f 316,385 51,884 16. 15 5. ~ ('1,J."J;. Ill1Jl') 9,728 ~ 774,930 120,234 1 S. 52 6. 'l'ror (;r. 'fI'.) 11,336 ~ 69914,734 8,718,990 12.47 7. ~(:r.'fI'.) 13,572 ~ 26,370,271 3,110,287 11.79 8. iiI'~ (w.If.) 5,079 ~T 2,053,058 225,568 10.99 9. ~~ (V.~. Q) 5,464 19,896,843 2,047,186 10.29 !tl"" 10. ~ (V.,. 11M) 7,237 ~m 4,280,818 325,971 7.61 11. ~ (",.lIT.) nmq 13,295 12. ;n'QJ mtrt .(VI. tt. ) t6,181 ~ 451,610 422,841 93.63 13. oroi\' (lIT. of. ) 13,346 f~ 6,220,406 5,768,200 92.73 14. ilIft (tr .tt.) 8,423 ~ 604,471 316,047 52.28 IS. ~ (If.~. 0-) 5,719 \ll'lft'iR 40,249 18,629 46.28 1 6. """'''* (Ill. tt. ) 5,995 tiMT~~~'A 1,086,730 351,808 32.37 17. f'lJl:l1'(,.;:;rt (~r) 18,870 ~u;t 18. f~ (\'iI'.:r.) 6,078 f.A>1am:m 19. fit~ (If.,. a) 9,880 188,741 49,634 26.30 ~ 20. r.n:~ (;r.lIT.) 7,553 ~11' 493,757 121,814 25.67 21. 'Iif-m ('q .~.mr) i 9,140 ~u;tlfm: 22. ;ri;r.rr ('t1. t. q) 15,591 t~ 103,676 6,914 6.67 23. ~ (trm) 22,328 ~. 631,839 41,428 6.56 24. ~ lim (VI. tt. ) 5,577 2.13 ~tl '!I'~ ~ ~ ~ 'lIT ~lflaT ~ Ai ~ ~ 25. ~ (v .t.~) 6,628 11; ~ it ;r1fU1I' ~ 11; lttEr it 'IS!!' smr lIir 22 ~~ 26. ~T (lIT .of. ) 8,911 it 121rt ro;r til 971 it 1{6!f !P.!II' ipr '3' r ~If,{ 11; 2 1 l:l'flrl . 27. ~ (;r.IfT.) 13,490 it 11~ ~ lfT I 1frof 11; ~ ;;r;niv!n 11; 23. 31 srf~ 28. ir.IT (VI' .of.) 7,107 Iti\' ~ it 1tiI1' smrlliT 20. 29 ~ ;ft~ t I \'iI'~t a''Ii ~t 29. "1(11014"4 (1t. t. b) 8,309 ~ ~T~~ql 'iii' sm t 1I'S!I'lRofI', ~ ~ ~ t ~ oqfir,.; ;ft~ t nr viEr m tllfT ~ i ~w ;fr~ t I 3 o. fiferm;fr (lIT. of. ) 7,423 lfSl~!II' 'Il"t ~ ilrtT « ~ft;r.rr flf~ «,.;d'I" t fit; :a:~ Vilf ffi";r 31. tiroft (;r. 'fI'. ) 13,055 r (m-r) )0,969 2. 1 6 1981 'til' ~1f'IAT if 81 m;ff ~ ;f1J1: ii; ." if 38. ~ (vr .of.) a-fkqfifet f'1i'!fT t(1fT t if!U ~~ ~ V~lf:et fm -rm t, ~ 41,698 m~ui'r 3 u;t 4 it I{m!fl' lfll'r ~ I 39. orJm (lI' ., . .w;r) 9.536 mtvft 3 40. ~~T'¥ ('1"'.".) 8.468 41. t;rl1:a- (q.,.!il.) 1181 III\' 1IAIIGIIIl if ~ ...m 11ft ,t"4 9,731 42. ;nt~q;)~ ('t.,;.a.) 9,105 'lIi1f "I'm: 'iii' "I'Ilf u;t srff'ff« ~lI' 43.• f.f~ (J.f.,.W. ) 6,949 PIT U. .~lTil( (v.,.!il.) 6,959 2 3 45. ~jr'ih (If.,.~.) 6,483 I. m.r ('I' .~. mr) 7,593 .46. ~ ( ... 'I'r.) 17,279 2. ..,...rorlfl~ ('If .ll. ~h) 6,211 47. ~ (mer) 9,181 4
~ } -I 3
14. Meghalaya 1,3.15.1'19 :!~1, 133 IS.(i7~ 3. Amllrpatun (NAC) 11,453 ,15. Uttar Prade,h 110,R62,OI3 19,599,1 15 17.95 4. Am3rw3r3 (NAC) 6.1160 1I) .15 16. Sikkim 316.3R5 51,OR4 5. Anuppur (NAn. 9,7211 17. Nagaland 774.930 120.234 15.52 6. Arang(M) 11,336 JR. Bihar 69.914.73~ 8.718.990 12.47 7. Bagbahara (M) 13,572 19. Oris,a 26,370,271 3.110.287 11.79 :W. Tripura 2.053,058 225,56R 10.99 8. Bagh (GP) . 5,079 21. Assam 19,R96.R43 2,0~7, 186 10.29 9. Baikunthpur (NAC) 5,464 22. Himachal I)l'ade~h 4,2RO,81S 325,971 7.(,1 10. Badod (NAn 7,237 l'lIion Territoric\ 1 I. Bamor 1M) 1~,295 I. Chandigarh 451,610 422,R41 93.63 12. Bansag3r(GP) 6,181 2. Delhi 6,220,40(, 5,768,220 92.73 13. Bargi (GP) 13,346 .l. Pondicherry 60-*,471 3J6,047 52.28 14. Badi (M) 8,423 4. Lakshdecp 40,249 I R,629 46.28 15. Barigarh I~AC) 5,719 5. Goa, Daman & 5,995 Diu I,OR6,730 351.R08 32.37 16. Bharbeli IGP) 6. Andaman & 17. Bt-ilai Kalan (SADA) 18,870 :'('. ~fl Nicobar Islands 18~.741 .~9.634 111. BbiJakhcdi (eT) 6,078 7. Mi1.oram 493,757 121,814 : '.67 ] 9. Bijuri (NAC) 9.880 1:. Dadra & Nagar Haveli 10.',676 6,914 6.67 20. Bir,ingpuT 1M) 7,553 9. Arunachal Pradesh 631,839 -1-1,.es 6.56 21. Chandia (NAC) 9,140 22. Chandla (NAC) 5,591 2.13 It may be seen from this table that in respect of the proportion of urban popUlation to total popu 2~. CTlaroda (SADA) 22,328 lation Madhya Pradesh ranks in 12th pesition out of 24. Chaurai Khas (GP) 5,577 the 22 States. It is interesting to note that in 1971 6.62R Madhya Pradesh was occupying the, 11 th plaC'e among :!5. Daboh (NAC) 21 States of the country at that tim·e. Wilh its 20.29 26. Damua (GP) 8,911 per cent urban component in the populaikn !\fadh) a 27. Dhamnod (M) 13,490 Pradesh is below the all India average of 23.31. As far 7,107 a" its immediate neil!hbours are concerncd. Madhva 28. Dllana (GJ» Pradesh is far below Maharashtra and Gujarat anrl" a 29. Dharamjaigarh INACI 11,309 little below Andhra Pradesh and Raiasthan. However. 30. Dighwani (GP) . 7,429 'Madhya !'t',h:esh can still take ,nnsolation that the ·,ther three J,eighbouring statcll, Utmr Pradesh, Bihar 31. Gormi (M) . 13,055 and Orissa-are placed below it. 32. Govindgarh (NAC) 7,115 2.14 It may incidentlly be mentioned that in res 33. Hanumana (NAn 8,182 pect of its share of India's urban population Madhya 11,713 Pradesh was occupying rank 8th in 1971; it has 34. Harsud (NAC) climbed up to rank 7 now. 35. Jaithari (M) 13.115 9,241 2.15 One of the reasons for the raj)id grc" th of 36. Jaitwara (NAC) urban population has bcen increase in the numher (If 37. Jamul (SADA) 10,969 places recognised as towns in each ;)lJccceding Cen 4,698 suses. 311. Jatachhapar (GP) 39. Jatar:.! (NAC) 9,536 2.16 Tn 1981 Census tIle following 81 places were 40. Jeerapur(NAC) 8,468
added as towns and 1 town wa~ dechssified. These are 41. Kailara~ (!'IlAC) 9,731 shown in table 3 and 4 : -l2. Kantarhod (NAC) 9,105 TABLE 3 43. Khaniyadhana (NAC, 6,949 New Towns added ;11 1911 I CellSIIJ - -_ .. -- 44. Khargarur (NAn 6,959 SI. Name with Status of the town Population 6,483 No. 45. Khujncr (NAC) . 17,279 1. Akoda (NAn 7,593 46. Kondagaon (1\-1) • :!. Alamapllr ("'AC) 6,211 -l7. Kumhari (SAD A) 9,181 1 RGIl86-4 5
2. 1 7 4 f.:!; 2 3 ~ufr ~ tit") it ~ ~ ~ fw:rr orffi ~ iRr~ m ,j'lf"'<:,!'J 'OfT f.Ii' 19 i 1 it 'i.~ ~ ", 'l1)qT~ ;pr;: 48. ;;moo" (",. ~. ~. ) 8,6S7 if Ilfl:iffif50. "Ifrir~ ('II' .~.'ll. ) 8,845 2. 1 8 -m:1Ifr 5 ~ f-.r~~ ;f¥r!l' "",!:Tl§'.IT n;.i ~'IiT pr 51. lfm"Tr ('11'.~.~l.) 8,71 S '3r;f;:iw ~ srf"l'!1ffi' ::rnT!l'T 'IJ'1.IT ~ I f1('~iT it QF.rn"!' '1';' tl'C'::t "DT 52. ~ ('OI".,.aT.) 8,930 if ~illT if1.fT ~ I 53. If'l'iffi ('-t. ~.Ill. ) 6,312 54. 1ft (V.~.aT.) 10,185 55. ~ (q.~.Ill.) 13,242 56. ~ ('II' .~.~l.) 8,760 57. ~.g (to.iIT.) 16,847 if'l't"r"-l :;r;:rn'rn ~"" GJif 5S. ~ (q .~.~.) 7,589 Wm~ 59,'ifflfft (q.,.~.) 5,380 if'I'(~ 60. ~~5,IRO 30. -.;:r.t~ 8,01,384 1,04,916 13.09 2.17 In respect of tab1e No. 4 it mav bc stated 3 2 l!y way of dariftcation that Bmragarh and Govind 48. Lakhnadon (NAC) 8,687 pura which were taken as sepal'ate towns in 1971 49. Laundi (NAC) 8,772 have since been mcrged in Bhopal. Similarly, the two 8,845 towns ~,,;cith Jhaa.rakband and South Jh~}?;Iakhand of 50. Madhogarh (NAC) 1971 have since become one single town. 51. Majhauli (NAC) . 8,718 52. Maksi (NAC) 8,930 ~.18 Table 5 shows the district-wise u~ban popu 53. Mangawan (NAC) 6,312 lation and its proportion to total population. The 54. Mau (NAC) 10,185 districts have been arranged in descending order of 55. Mauganj (NAC) . 13,242 per.centage 'Jf pt1pulation. 8,670 56. Mihona (NAC) . TABLE 5 57. Morar Cantt. (CB) 16,847 D:str;::twi~~ Pr"p )I'!i.>n of Urban p.,pulation in Descending 58. Mundi (NAC) 7,589 59. Naigarhi (NAC) 5,380 Name of District Total Urban Percentagc 7,212 Population Population of Urban 60. Nasrullaganj (GP) Population 61. Naya Bardwar (NAC) . 3,722 to total Population 62. Niwari (NAC) 10,462 63. Obedullaganj (GP) 7,454 1 2 3 64. Pllchore (NAC) . 9,287 4 65. palcra (NAC) 7,936 1. Bhopal 8,94,739 6,81,853 76 21 8,059 66. pathalgaon (NAC) 2. Indore 14,09,473 9,29,428 65.94 5;163 67. piploda (NAC) . 3. GwalioT 11,07,879 6,09,411 55.01 68. Prithvipur (NAC) 12,163 4. Jabalpur 2,198,743 9,90,492 45.05 69. Rampur-Baghelan (NAC) 9,907 5. Ujjain 1[,17,002 4,18,672 37.48 6. J)urg 18,90,467 6,01,104 31. 80 70. Ranipw'a (CT) 5,065 7. Ratlam 7,82,729 2,40,492 30. n 71. Ratanpur (NAC) 13,140 8. Sagar 13,23,132 3,68;605 ·27.8(j 72. Saroi TIlcrmall'ower Station (NAt:) 46,514 9. East-Nimar 11,53,580 3;09,200 26.80 10. Hoshangabad 10,03,939 2;52,084 251L II . ChhindW'ara 12,33,131 2,61.167 . 21.18- 73. Semaria (NAC) 5,956 12. Mandsaur 12,63,399 2,55,9':'6 20.26 13. Datia 3,11,893 60,991· BUS 74. Scondha (NAC) 11,605 14. Dcwas 7,95,309 1,48,767 18.70 75. Shahgarh (GP) 8,498 15. Shahdol 1.3,45,125 2,39,616 17.81 8 11,578 76. Shahpur (East Nim r) (M) 16. R,a.ipur 30,79,476 5,29,225 17.18 7,935 77. Shahpur (NAC) . 17. Bhind 9,73,816 1,66,212 17.07 (Mandla) 18. Vidisha 7,133,098 .1,32,905 16.g7 7,373 78. Shabpura (NAC) 19. Satna 11 ,53,387 1,86,737 16.19 20. Chhatarpul' 8,86,660 1,38,081 15.57 79. Sinuour (NAC) . 5,367 21. Betul 9,25,387 1,41,736 15.32 80. Soyat Kalan (NAC) 8,899 22. Shajapur 8,40,247 1,24,76S 14.85 81. Udaipura (NAC) 7,618 --- --_ .. _."_-' .. -....• _--_ .. __ ._---_._----- 23. West-Nimar 16,30,943 2,41,176 14.79 24. Darnoh 7,21,453 1,04,025 14.42 TABLE 4 25. Guna 10,01,985 1,41,599 14.13 Towns Dcdas~ificd ill 19~1 CCIJ~u:, .:!6. Uilaspur 29,53,366 4,08,784 13.84 _. ------"------_.. _-_.' ---_ .. _._- .------.. ------.--_. __ . __ ._--_. 27. Morena 13,03,213 1,78,250 13.68 Name with Status of the town Population ....•. -.-...... _- .. ------_._ 28. Narsimhapur 6,50,445 98,1.27 f3.55 ---.---~.------.. ----.. -.-- ._---- __ _ 2 29. S.:hore 6,57,381 87,482 13.31 - .-' _- _. __ .------_._._. --_. ""-" ....•.. --._. -_._--- -_ ...... I. Dungaria Chhapara(NM) 5,180 30. Rajgal'h 8,01,384 1,04,916 1_3 .. 09 ...... _..... _.. _... _----_._------_. ------_._- -.....- '--'-"--'-" __ . _._. ----_.. _.. _-- _._. ------2 :I 4 2 :1 4 -.. --....----- .. ---. ..."_'" .. -_ ... _._ .. __ .. 43. JfI1S~ 1(1,:!7,39,' 73,179 7.05 3 I. -:fifI 12,07,5SJ 1,57,659 13.05 ·j'l. ~ 1 S~ -I :!,85·1 1,11,706 6.06 32. fl1Tl'ffer 8,65,930 1,11,147 12.83 45. ~,orr f).BO,·167 t 9,65.~ I. BS 1,:J 2.!)S (J I:!. 57 :1:1. U~ 1 (1,3 7,469
3-1. ;::r.i;rt~ 11. (17,501 1, ·1 I,:! 5 2 12.35 2. 19 ~<=r Of;rmr if; ~,!'Trn it ;rlTr')"q 11 ;rmr it 'ifl:ir 35. "t'j'EfOij.'fI' 7_.:16, 981 89,410 12. 13 il'im '1't!T "1'1'm'f f7tm m a;'if l?frr q;:: ~ I ~r fll~ if <.~ 7.10;542 7(1,73 (l fl.95 36. ;::nffi;r 'fit ;::r~nH;fr f~ ~ a~ ~<:fu<:!r ~~ 'fiT fJfl.'lT'fi<: f-.j~ :i" ;rlf(;- m;::"ftG
1971 tfq'( 1981 ~i'(T if ~. ~r;:: ~ ~f~
-_.. _----- ..... _--_. 1971 'flf'l 1971 it WcrT~~ 1981ii~'i 1981 lIfT 'OA'- ~'fli'if; ;wU ~ 1f.T m'I\T>: li' 4,767 100.00 327 1 0,586459 100.00 lI'')-;r ...... __ .. _...... __ ._---_.-- .. _._.- .. , ... _-'" _.... -.
~T 7(~) 2. 21 ~i·..:ofl 6 ~ if; a[l"f.ll: if. 'q~m<: 1 ~ 7 1 ~ J 9 S I lfiT ;;r;\'1 '" i{ I if ;rrro If.T Rm:1J'f Dhar LO,37,469 1,32,980 11.57 total population, it is the newly carv::d out di;,ITict of 34. Rajnandgaoll 11 ,67,501 1,44,252 J 2 35 Bhopal which occupy the top most position. It is in 35. Tikamgarh 7,36,981 89,410 12.l3 "his dis'i.J.ict that the State ca~i.t~ll is located and his 36. Raisen 7,10,542 70,73() 9.95 together with Berasia town, contrib~tes to 76.21 per ccnt urban component in the district population. 37. Balaghat 11,47,RI0 99,802 8.69 38. Surguja 16,33,476 1,41,968 h 69 However, it may be noted that ill terms of sheer sizc of urban population, it is Jabalpur district which 39. Raigal'h 1.4,43,197 1,21 ,t3.~ 8 39 7,95,168 66,257 8 33 comes upper most. Indore district occupies 2nd rank 40. Jhabua both in respect of size of urban population and also 41. Panna 5,W,978 42,041 7 78 the proportion of urban population in the total }:'opu 42. Sconi 8,09,713 62,704 7.74 Jation. 43. Mamila [0,37,394 73,179 7.05 2.20 Table No. 6 shows distribution of towns by population size 1917 and 1981 Censuses.
TABLE 6
lJisld" lIIiol! f~rU'\IlS by plJ{,lIiati,m ~·i:e 19i f (lId 1981 C'ell.HIs.·s
-- .----..... -.----.------~------.----.----- ... ------.-- Sile ('lass ()f l-)\\'Il NUlllher ()if 1971 Per..:elluge of NUlllht:rof 1981 ~p~:::-e-:~~ ~f- tl.)WnSi'l !,()Ipnlatiol1 populatioll!\f towns in p()~lulatinl1 Impulation(lf 1971 thiscateg(~IV 191i1 this.::at<:g;'ry nf I,)\vns tr) Ill' to \'0 11' In to ta I url:>a n t·.lta I ur ba n population pOl'ulalbn ------.. _-_------.. -- -~_.;;--.----. ------._------_.... _-_---- ... _.. _-- -.. _-- Z 3 4 5 6 7 -----~--.------.... ----.-----~--- ... --... -- .. ~ ------_... ------_--_._-- 1 (1,00,000 & .; ) II 27,85,788 41.06 14 4~,! 3,431 43.53 II (50,001)-99,999) !4 8,47,0:!.~ 12.48 27 18,54,995 17.52 LII (20,000- 49,1199) 43 1,382,786 20.3S 4!l IS,li ,098 14.2!l IV (10,000- 19,999) 74 998,525 14.7-:' 119 J 6,9S,468 16. G4 V (5,a03-9,999) % 723,829 10.67 114 389,551 8.40 VI Bd!'\\' 5,OOfl 12 46,8J6 9.69 ') 18,916 0.18
______• ______.._ - .... ------_____ i. ______
2.21 Table No. 6 shows the distribution of towns TABLE 7(A) by population size in the 1971 and 1981 Censuses. Distribution of Statutory and NOIl-Sta.tutory Town, by size c1a~s 14. class I towns contain a nearly half 43.58 per cent of the total urban population of the States. III fact Size cirss of towns Total Numb..:r of Numbe~ of 75.38 per cent of the urban population i!; contained number towns having non-muni- only in 89 c.lass I-III towns. In other words 1,4 of the of towns statutory cipaI Census bodies and total number of towns, contribute to more than 314 Projcc t of popUlation. It is interesting to find that 43 class towns HI towns in 1971 contributed to 20.38 per cent of the 2 3 1971 urban population where 48 class III towns in 4 1981 contain only 14.28 per cent of the total popula r . 14 13 I tion. The loss here is perhaps taken o\··er by class II H 27 25 2 III towns which have improved their cont~nt from 1 2.48 48 ·n 5 IV to 17.52 per cent. 11 ~I 110 9 V. 114 83 31 \[ . 5 t _ .. _------_.. _ 4 2.22 Table _7 (A) shows the distributinll of stalt:f:PfY Total rn 27.~ and nOI1-·;tatutllJ'y t(}WIl<; hy "i7(' c1:J,~ 1
2. 23 8 -i. 1 lf~ if 'f111: f'flfl'l', iflf(qrfu"'fiT, 9;fftpJfif\'f alii!' 2. 26 lfi[ ~ Ofr ~m~ ~ I ~Ij- I if; a;1mflT'Ii qfCT'Ii ~ar ~ ~ ~iji" ~ q<."i Iii'! arf!l''f4~ ~ f'li o:rm ~tJfr ~ i'f"ifif it 3,275 '!if !:.t'\l 'J'lf 'flf{ 'Vir<:T ;;r!'l .T!(f~f lli~firlf, llSr'nif) q;'f; if1f'J iflTU 'fIT>: iflf~- if;;:itit~ ~f!l"- I 2.83 II '¥iT q" l!iT msll1 f.f1T1l '1I'R:r'PT Clli ~ficra 3.16 Iffir In 3.00 ------IV 7.55 2 3 5 G 7 V 12.88 ------V[ 39.37 - .... --_-_ .. _. __ .•...-._._------...... -._-'----- I 14 6 7 l(m.tr) II 27 23 2 2 ( Hlm, urii' ) rf'r.m. f~'iI'q;ft~'Ii Dynamics .ofIndia's Population ( ., III 48 39 3 ;)- 1~,2; Growth it if""l if; i{f~ it f\'l"laa- ~"'l1'I1:Q it lIT~~ ifm R1 3 ~(lffiT~ ._------!tt~T q"'{ mr ~q ('SI'fu 'flj fiI;. t:j)' • '1\1_) it~) 2 3
I 14 3,527 I 14 885 II 27 J, 15 2 H 27 862 III 4~ :;,n5 111 48 884 IV 119 1,:l:!2 1V 119 899 V 114 776 V 114 894 vr 5 2~4 VI fi4 R;;7 .. _-- . 327 2,175 ,~ ifIr(r:r :127 Stl3 - - --_-_ .. _-_. 7
2.23 84.1 per cent of the towns havt' statutOJY toury body fall in size class V. Class VI towns con- body like the Corporation, Municipal Committee, sists of the civil station of Panchmari, tourist centre Notified Area Committee. Cantonment Board etc. of Khajuraho, the mining towns of Panara and Jatach- Bhilainagar the Steel township is the town in size hapar md the new township of Naya Baradwar. dass I whieh does not have any Statutory body. The '} 24 Table (7)(b) whiCh is given below clarifies largest number of towns which do not have any statu- the situation of civic status of towns. TARLE 7 (n> To,,',. IJI' Cirk Sf!lllis ------.--. , .. _-_._--- Size class o.f town Total NU.nberd towns ha"in~ N(.of ---._---_ .... _------....--.------._-_ .. _------t'lwn~ Municipal Mlmici~al Can!'" 1'1. N!l'tified Oltlcrs cOrrpor~. tjilll cllll'mittee ment lloard c~lmmHtee ----.--_.-.--.. -.- '---. -----2·-----3 -----4- 5 ·-6----7-.. ·-·-.... ·-·-···-.. ·-----,,·----- ";'1' '---' .--.- .. -·-·------·-1'4----"6----.,-.------.---..1(!('1-)------.----. " II 27 23 2 2(lSADA-CT) 111 48 39 t l S(!-SADA- 2eT-ZGP) .LV 119 N9 1 20 9(2-SAOA--2CT-5GP) V 114 33 t 49 31 (I-SADA-4CT-26G p) VI S . . . . . • 1 -1(2-SADA-.2GPI Total -'- :n7 .------6'.-" --'1''9'1--'-'--- -·-S-·--.. ------jj--S2(tO-(:T-i..:::·SAf-.A..:j·s2.25 Nearly 70 per cent of the towns having statu P. C. Si'nna in his Dynamics of India's Population tory bodies have municipal committee. A little more Growth has this to say about the towns. "In India, than 114 (26.5 per cent) are covered by Notified the concept of planned urban development is of recent Town Area Committe. Six Class I towns have Muni origin, our eities and towns were not planned, most cipal Corporation. It may be remembered that this of them were built without a thought, hastily, greedily status pertain to 1980. and tastelessly, the net con~equenCe of the absence (Subsequently the State Government have pleased of a positive attitude on the subject of "tll"banization to notify, many more corporation<;). in India has been a unregulated, imbalanced growth TABLE 8 of urban popUlation without corresponding resource allocations for urban be·dies and without the essential D~n5ity by si7.e class of t"V:ns, 1981 Cen~u~ ---.------"------_ ....._------physical and social infrastructure to meet the need Class of town Number of Density of the growing population. We have ')0 neglected the towns (po!-,ulation becol11l! per sq. cities and towns that they have dungeons of Km.) filth and squalor and its is to tt.cse places that the village folk are lured". I 14 3.527 H 27 3,152 TIT 48 3,275 2.28 The picture of density is really appealing. As IV 119 1,322 it is, the picture is probably more than hideous aUowed V 114 776 to grow on unheeded and unrelieved. It will ultimately VI 5 254 and inevitably term as ugly. As in some of the big Total 327 2,173 . cities which are nothing but a bubb1in.~ mass of hu manity. 2.26 It may be seen that the highe~t lEnsity is shown 2.29 Table 9 below shows the Ilex-ratio bv size by the towns of size class I. This is exactly us it class of towns : should be but surprisingly that the size class ITT towns which show the next highest density (3,275 persons' per sq. Km. as against 3,tS2 persons per. sq. Krn: TABLE 9 in size class II) ; the density then I!oes on decrea~ing Sex Ratio by Si7e Class of Town, 1981 Census as we go down from size class IV- to VI. Looked at ----.' - .. ---_... _._- _- '-_" ---.- --_ from another angle the density picture exhibited by Class of town Number of Sex Ratio class I-lIT towns is not one whieh could be said (Number of .. to be satisfactory. One sq. Km. means 10,000 sq. females meters of land. It means that the Lebensraum per per urban individual in these size c1asses is as below_ thousand _.' .. --- males) Size class Land avail able per 2 3 per'lon J 14 (in so. 885 meters) r.... ; II 27 862 m 48 T 884 2.83 IV 119 899 TI 3.16 m 300 V 114 894 TV 7.55 VI 5 857 V I') 811 VJ 39.37 State Urban 327 883 8
_ ... --._------2. :10 "3"'T'l"f. 'TRofr >t. : "T'T Ti9lT 'fll{ nr::rr "f,~t W'H f"rlll1'"wr ~ 1Il if, ;rorif it ,P'T if; "s;' fr.rIfl'\.'lN ir." 'f'J'f7 it I 91i" JI 'lfl { ~ 'lIlT vr if, ;:rlp't it W'f 'liT"; iT 'Ii" ~ I ::.rlf l V n;:t v if; 'frPi it --_--- _-_ .. __ ._--- __ .
~ ~ orfi.l'!: r. I ]. 'frlJfl1rrT<: ql 7. il''f ~ :.1-1 .::;. -. ~ ~. ~;:rp:~ 'f'f'l'I' :::;..:J j 2. 3 1 ~: ;;llft7.f ~ffi ~ mi{rur Iii"," :rr i· .;r.r"l'p. 712 t I ~ "6l!Tif ~ "fffirit f'F Ifill I'll 0 7 1 ~'F m~, it :8"iiT 5. .rTfi "hir 73S ~ it "fiTffi~ ~PT ~ ire! ~ I 1 97 I it :w, fi~, 1ft tJ7.IT Ii. ~ I W. f.fiTrr 'f'ffr;r ~ if f~'IT'f 1') I) 1 it 9 ;~ 7 it I !):n ;ft flfllS 7-t5 ~ ~i2 ~r llliT ~I I!I·i1 ~ 1951 it fl;qfiJ it '!is ,!l'Tf<: gm 7 'lmR ""If~ 754 ~ rn'10. ,!w.~ "nf"f':n: ii5
: u;T1l'linT mif qfro-ff 1f'T Tt 2 f.rmr ~rril if;T ~"I; trTif ~ I q;!flffi, ~l; 'tiC, ~m ~, irorr .. ~ ~ ~ ..1"," ~ ~ 'lifl:llT 'filf f~'ffif 'fiT i{rif 'fiT H11J1· 9fl0 : f"u~ t1r"T if ~=r ~ ttcr 1911 flAil 913 q~ W'1~rrr: iflf1J it 1fri'[ ~ I 1941 970 882 967 907 1951 2. 3 5 ~f~1:f ~ ;;lRflf alilf 'for fi:rlfr.'!:qP-r S S 3 ~ O'fl orrllflfM 9S:1 866 1961 : if 1 0 j(; 1971 9U 86S ~ I mil" if it.~ "fT': 'fI11:'ilm"r, R:;;~"~.PT,~Tf, J:!h:~ 1981 941 SS3 QJr ~ ~ ~ 'Ii')- mr ~t ;;ft ~!fT ~ m!;f:T ~ ~ ,!Wr ;JlT~ i" ~ iIill~"{f lJ,Cf ~T ;:rrUlJ 1l1;;{ it ~ 'fiT ~ 'fiT ~r"l'r. W-~ ~ I 1 9 Slit Silrlf orr>: .1ilf w;.fi snif.w. ~cm;; *'" ~:i[T 'FT ~ ~ ~~ ~ m f~ it ~mr merf ~ 'ref ~ ~F.i. ~i:T i 'lir<:ur ~"" qq 2.33 f~ 'fir trRn:1IT ~qiHit it 'Iili ~ ~1 trRel" I 'FT f:r ~~.:r i ~ it wrta !f!l!' ~ffir ~. ~ rar Cantt. Gwalior 775 is found to be stabili"cd itself.. As.- against Bansagar and Bargi are project towns" ar their ~n.,. .... this the six ratio in the urban areas declined !1;OJIl. itial stage of construction inhabited by most!y Jlll,, 937 in 190] to 872 in 1931. 1941 and ]951 regIster rant labourers and workers leaving behmd th~lr faDll ed improvement and thete was a short decline in 1961. lies at their old places of residence. Pachmarhl, Jabal S:nce then the posItion appears to be towards im~ pur Cantonment, Sagar Cantonment, Dhana, Morar proving. For facility of comparison the sex ratio for Cantonment have defence units and as such the rea the total popUlation of the state ~nd tl-Je urban com Son for v,?ry low. sex-r!ltio ~re .not far .to se~k: Man ponents thereof is shoWn in the inset below :- town is sItuated 10 Bh10d dlstnct and It exhibIts the TABLE 9(1) traditional pattern of very low sex ratio of that area. The very low sex ratio in Sidhi town seems to be due Census Sex. Ratio to the of the region. where Year peculiarity Baghe1kh~d menfolk move out for work of urban areas leavmg be Total Urban P()pulation Population hind their families in villages. The sex tatio for the urban areas of the 2 3 2.35 State as a whole works out to 883 with a range of variation" 1901 990 937 from 534 the lowest in Bansagar town to 1016 beiq " 1911 986 913 the highest in Bharbeli town. There are only four 1921 974 871! towns \iz.; Bharbeli, Tilda Newra, Bagbahara and J931 973 872 Chhuikhandan, in the State where females outnum "1941 970 882 ber males. Of these Tilda Newara and Chhuikhadan 1951 967 907 are old towns while Baglahara and Bharbeli are new 1961 953 866 towns added for the first time in 1981. All these towns 1971 941 868 exhibit the traditional pattern of high sex-ratio of 19~1 941 883 the Chhatisgarh and Balaghat tract in which ~hev ue 2.32 The behaviour of sex ratio in urban centres , situated. makes an interesting study. Big urban centres and in dustrial and mining towns are generally, characterised 2.36 Mention must be made of size class VI. Nor by low sex ratio. Similarly the project towns also ex mallv speaking the sex ratio should not be so low in hibit low sex ratio. But when these big urban cen this size class because this class is .iust extension of tres cross their initial stage of development, the sex the rural situation. In Madhya Pradesh, however, ratio tends to stabilise and improve. It will be useful there are onlv 5 towns in this size class and they are to illustrate this by taking Bhilajnagar as the example. Kha.iuraho, Pachmarhi, Panara, Jatachhapar and The steel town of Bhilainagar started coming laP from Naya Baradwar. Khajuraho is the internationally 1957 and in ] 961 it was in the initial stage of deve famous archaeological centre of .~at tourist interest lopment. By 1971 it was settled township. The sex. and it is in the same situation today as a project town ratio in BhiIainagar in 1961 was 486. In 1971 it im exhibiting a sex ratio of 797. Panara and Jatachhapar proved to 785 and has reached the figure of R53 in are coal mining towns and in coal mines it is likely 1981. that it represents a situation where the menfolk have moved in but the families hav~ yet to come. Panara town has shown sex ratio of 894 whereas Jatachhappar 2.33 This behaviour of sex ratio is not difficult to has shown sex ratio of 840. It is three towns in size appreciate. When an industrial town or a project town class which have brought down tbe sex: ratio of tbh or any other urban centre starts developing, it is the class to 857. The fourth town of the size class, Naya menfolk who move there first living in temporary Baradwar has sex ratio of 891 which is higher than structures without their families. In course of time the State avera~e for the urban areas. So as far as quartl'r;; get built uP and residential colonies are es the low sex ratio of size class VI is concerned it i. tab.lished and then families also shift to the township. main Iy .l!overned bv the proiect like situation of Kha ThIS normal feature gov'erns the ,,~~ ratio in such iuraho, Panara and Jatachhapar those of the five towns. Cantonments also exhibit 1JW sex ratio for towns of this size class. ' ohvious reasons. The first 10 towns of the State show 2,37 Table No, 10 given below show the average ing lowest sex l:ltio are shown in the statern~nt given number of Households per census hOuse by size class "elow:- of towns. 1 RGIJRf\~'1 9
~'" 10 :! 3 ~ ~ "" ~ smr "lA'I'n 'AlA a.le mmT llif Qn- 119 1, US 1911~ IV( IO,O()O-19,~199) V( 5.000-9999) 114 1. 05 5I'fu' ~ 1fofiTif VI( 5000 ~ lfolf) 5 1 ,115 ~ 'ff«r-q "') ...... -- ._ .. ~ ~ 327 1. 03
2 3 2" 3 & l:1'f Jfr~) {nJ. ~if f~fu' f~r 'ift ~i « ~ ~ ~ ~r;;n mr'~I~;r;r l!'f, ~>i ~ f", f~ ifiIl I \(F% ~ ~ 'lffuif,') 14 1. 03 ~'5I'ftf 100 ~~ lrmol 'R I 03 ~ 105 'I'fun;: t I ~~ II, (~0IOOO-99,999 '1.7 1. 04 "ffiii it ~ l'I'rofi 1fiJ: ~I.ff ~ f.r. 'U'i'l if, '11J7:h ~tiJ it 'I'f' ~ 'for HI '( 20,0 '!i1:ffi' 2. :1. . ~~ ~.il'.~~~.~ ~I ...... _-_ .. ... 32. ~vtlTrw. ~~') ~o-1 1 f~'1T ~1!iIfr<:rIfT ;il ar1mt qqT (1'4'1 ifAlfA' 1382.S 32. -1 20.0 33. 1!iT ~ 8'1 ~ 1447.5 :I:!. 1 IS.3 34- ~m-~~ 1241.0 41. 1 7.5 ~11 35 'll'lIttliT 14::0.6 :.t I. 7 17. I 36 fEJ~ Am ,!!lmm if 1M It- ~;{ 1090.1 30.6 18. :l 37. ~ 1495.9 :10.8 18.5 38. ~?: ~~a:~ 1672.6 :JO.8 18.5 39. a~ em 1404.8 30.2 17.4 40. (f'r.lfl'. ) ~ 1327.8 32.6 21. 2 41. 1:~ 1627.0 33.5 21.5 ------42.'t.~ 1 2. 3. -1. 1332.0 32.6 21. 2 43. rT 1276.9 32.6 21. 2 44. ~~ 1388.2 1. ILW 712.1 32.5 18.8 32.6 21. 2 45. ~ 1534.1 2.~ 705.1 32.5 18.8 31.2 18.9 3.~ 900.2 32.5 18.8 4.~ 793.8 32.5 18.8 50 ~') 869.1 38.0 5.8 m f,;mr ~~"'I.ff'1flii 6. '1..... 1219.8 31.8 17. I if f.I'.U;.!.~1I< ~il:rr tfl!T t:- 7.~ 1000.1 39.2 5.7 8. 9'Ef1:'!'= 1067.5 32.6 18. I ------_._--- 9. 'NT 1213.5 32.1 IS.7 f;;r ..... Jj,I:I~i;f'ii 10. mm: 1393.9 30.9 19.5 it ;{'I'll ~ m 11. ~~ 1173.0 30.9 19.5 ------_._------12.~ 1137. 1 32.1 18.7 701--800 13. UCfT 1167.7 40.0 7.8 SOl-900 3 14.~ 1314.7 31. 4 18.0 901-1000 15. ~ 1076.-1 32.3 18.3 4 1001--1100 16.~ 755.7 31. 5 18.6 8 1101-1200 17.~~ 975.6 31. !I HI.2 5 18.~ 894.9 38.7 1201-1300 7.8 6 19.~ 1047.6 32.9 18.4 1301--1400 6 20.~ 1047.3 31. 3 17.5 1401-1500 5 21. II~ 776.8 45.0 9.0 1501-1600 22.8R 929.7 31. 3 17.5 1601+ 23.~ 1053.4 31. 3 17.5 2 ----_ .. _------._-._---_.-_ -. 24.~ 886.3 33.6 19.6 25. n~ 960.7 33.6 19.6 45 '--- -_-._ .-. --._- - -_"'-'- 26.~~ 1994.6 32.9 18.4 27. Am 1159.7 31. 5 I 11.5 3. 3 ~if1:11J' U I!ft it'1!IiI' {r qm ~err ~;j; t'f1f<'l1R 'l''¥fl'tJ' it 28.~ 120S.9 31. 5 18.5 !q'~ "'" ~ ~, :a';n:-1.~ it h f1Ivt Of"ll: itil' ~ if; ~ 2~~ 1421. 3 31. 5 18.5 ~ icR it;m:ar fi;t'« 'If&'t ~ 'fiT ~I q t~ 'fi~r :omIT ~, 30.~i'I' 1245.1 31. 5 18.5 fiJ'ffi' 1!'3lI'r.fIif if ar_;q:Pf ifI!If m't(!' m ifrorr ;{in: ~ 1 fola~ if'4'T 31. ~ 112S.7 30.7 17.9
"_"~. ;;ril go: ROIl I!{;n ;;r.r10 CHAPTER-:lII PHYSICAL AND LOCAHONAL ASPECTS
.. -. ._------.. 3.1 The analysis made in 'this chapter is ~sed an ------_ _--_._- 2 3 4 st&temcnt 11 .which -presents the ;data relath~g to .physi cal and location a) aspects as in 1979. Hoshangabad ' 1382 S 32 3 2') 0 Jabalpur Tabk No. 11 giv-en below shows the average -rain 1447.5 32 1 18 3 fall and ttemperature -ut district -head-quarters -'town. Nt rsimhapur f241 0 41 8 7.5 Mandla 1420 6 31 _7 17.1 ··'J;·ABLE It Chhindwara 1094 I 30 6 18 2 Rainfall and temperature. at district-headquarters.towl\ Seoni 1495 9 JO.8 III 5 .B;l"lgha~ 167.!.6 30 8 HIS Name of the district Average Temperture \ CI Ambikapur 14048 30.2 17.4 headquarters town annual ,Bilaspur rainfall Maximu'n Mini'1l.utn 1327.8 32.6 21.2 (M.M.) Raiprh. 16270 33.5 21. 5 Rajnandgaol1 13320 32.6 21. 2 2 3 4 Durg 12769 32.6 21.2 Morena 712.1 32.S 18.8 Rail'ur 1388 2 32 6 21. 2 Bhind 705.1 32.5 IS.S JagdaJpur 1534 1 31.2 18.9 GwaJior. 900.2 32.5 18_8 Datia 793.8 32.5 18.8 Rainfall Shivpuri. 8Gt.7 38.0 5.8 Confining ·ourselves - first only to ;distdct .head Guna 1219.8 31. S _17. L quarters towns; the 45 such -towns ·fall in the -different Tikamgarh 1001. 1 39.2 5.7 rainfall mq:ges as shown below Chhatarpur 1067.5 32.6 18. I Panna 1213.S 32 1 18.7 Rainfall range (m.m." Number Sagar 1393.9 30.9 19.5 or District Head 1t73.0 30.9 19.5 Damoh quarters Satna 1137.1 32.1 18.7 towns Rewa 1167.7 400 7.8 1 2 Shahdol 13147 31. 4 18,0 Sidhi 10764 32 3 18.3 701-800 . 5 MandSilur 755.7 31. 5 18.6 801-900 . 3 901-1000 4 Radant 975.6 31.9 19.2 .1001-1100 8 Ujjain 894.9 38.7 7.8 1101-1200 5 Shajapur 1047.6 32 9 18.4 .1201-1300 6 Dewas 1047.3 31. 3 17.5 1301-1400 6 5 Jhabua 776.8 45.0 9.0 1401-1500 1501-}(j()() J 929.7 31.3 17.5 Dhar 1600+ 2 Indore 1053.4 31. 3 17.5 TOTAL 45 Kharsone ·886.3 33.6 19.6 l{halld..... a 960. 7 33.6 19.6 3.3 A glance at statement 11 would show that on Rajgarh . 1994.6 32.9 18.4 the whOle OwaJior Division ucei'Y'es the'leafl rainfall. Vidisha 1.159.7 31. 5 18.5 The northerly situated'Bhind town, being ,-situated on B.hopal l208.9 31. 5 18.5 an extension ·of what could 'be called the aad zone Sehore 1412.3 3LS IS.5 of Central India. receives the least rainfall of all the Raisen 1245. 1 31. 5 ISS district ,headquarters. -In Bhind and the adjoining Morena district, the environment has been .merciles Betul L128 7 30.7 17.9 sly disturb~~ and forest and vegetation has been 10 11
.,. ~ t, mrr.r srqT~ ~lf if; ~-m'!t ~ ql; 1ft ~ lfT.luft 801-900 if 't" ~ if .'ifai;rf.til:l"r ~ ~ tl ~ "'" ~, 'fI'tm;r flr . 1ft . it ((f.I" iffiif iOfl"f<;rlR ":.rt 1201-1400 it ~ffi" ~ I ~ 'T ~ if ~ffi" ~I m ~ ~.loift 1301-1400 1300 it m ~ I 5 firm ~l§!J1";;pff it t ~~ if ijiI"6" ;yilf ffi fir. liT. it ~ ffi" ~ I at)' fip ~ i'f'IfU ifir 19. 57 srfa-QT'f t I ~if~ I tn: ~ ~ f~. 'liT m ~ f.rf'f'l ~r ~lf'IT ~ f~ ;oft ~f§ if'('1{ 5 5 iflf~ lf~ o.lai'r 1001-1 100 f'l".;jf. if VRr t I fiPl';pf ijlf1f ~ ';I,"tT ~ lfit t ~~I f'fo ¥fl, ~iI" l:RIJ'i!; iI1:TiR: W ~~ 16.82 t I w~ ifT~ 47 'III<: ~ srRffi 14.31 t, o.lvff l:0{l-1-110P it~J tJ"1IT ~ I ~ ~ ~ if l:R11l ~ ~ ~ 1101-1200 f1f.~. if vffi" ~ I 36 'fiR: f'>r;r;pf _ il"ffiftr iIX'IiIT:.lfVr:rT it ;;rra- ~ mercilessly destroyed and this has obviously resulted also ~imi1arJy placd a~ [tlr as :.:cdpt of rainfall h con not only in affecting tcmprature but has also mate cerned. Though here also much mere \'woded Betul rially affected rainfall. is placed along !oide the much dcforc'ited, Vidisba. Rai<;cn and Bhopal receive<; lIiglw,t rainfall in the 3.4 Morena, the neighbouring district headquarters headquarters town of Bhopal Divi.,ion with Raisen town receives just 7 m.m. more rainfaU. In respect of stealing the march over tllC Stale capital. ' natural environment and !>parscness of vegitation Datia is just a shade better than Bhind and Morena, and perhaps principally because of this the region 3.9 HD!>hangabad on lh;: b.mk; of th~ ~aIlnada at received a little higher rainfall which is reflected in the foot of the Vindhva Ran~.! is placed along with Datia's 793.8 m.m. Shivpuri and Gwalior towns are the district headquarters of the 3 di'!;tricts of Chhattis more lucky and come in the range of 801-900 m.m. garh "iz; Raipur, Ra.i'la.nJl~:1(·n and Bilaspur and it Thus of the 6 headquarters, 5 fall in the two lowest receives larger rainfall than paddy distrit head ranges. Guna town is the luekie"t of the district quarters of Bilaspur and Rajnadgaon and its receipt headquarters of Gwalior Divi<;ion and receive'l the is iust less than 6 m.m. than Raipur. Of the Jistrict respectable rainfall of 1220 m.m. or so. head quarters of Bhopal Division, Sehore receives the largest rainfall of 1,412.3 m.m. 3.5 Three distriot headquarter3 town of Sagar Division and three of th\! adjoining Rewa Division 3.10 Of the 6 di.;trict headquarter'! of Jabalpur ('{)! come in th~ rainfall range of 1 -1200 wherea!> two divi~ion, mention has alre :d" been made of Chhind towns of Sagar Division (panna and Sagar) and one w&ra in the preceding paragraph. Narsimhapur is town of Rewa Division (Shaheol) go into the next two placed with Raisen, Bh.)pal and Durg and it receives ranges comprising 1201-1.1C'0. Of the district head almost the same rainfall as R3i~en, Seoni, Mandla and CJuarters in these two rlivi,ions, Sagar and Shahdol re Jabalpur towns have received rainfall of over 1400 m.m. ceive the highest rainf1l11, Sagar receiving more than and for reasons which arc not very clear it i'l Seoni ShahdoI.. Incidentally, Panna, Sagar anu Sha!tllol have which has received the lea"t rainfall of these 3. Bala larger vegetation cover. ghat. the south-eastern district heaclql.Y.lrlers of Jabal 3.6 The district headquarters towns of Ujiain and pur Division receives th righcst rainfall not ~nly in Indore Division seem to be quite content with remain this divisi<'n but in the whole state and alongwith ing in the ranges below 1100. Of these Mandsaur Raigal'h which it leaves behind bv ahout 45 m.m. is town receives the lea'lt (755.7 m.m.) minfall with olaced with it in thp. h,~hci't ran~l! of 1601 m.nt. Jhabua iust a few paces ahead with 776.8 m.m. Jagdalpur, the s(luthern-mo,t di"trict headquarters of Uijain and Khargone fall in ~he ne'(t higher range the State receives rainfall of about 1534 m.m. of 801-900 m.m. with Khargone being just a little less than Ujjain. The other six district 3.11 What applieo; tC' thL' dlc;trict htadquartcro; town headquarters of these two divisions climb up to applies to the towns of the dio;trict for thev fan in the the next two higher rangeo;-Dh3r, Khandwa and same rainfall range Or nearby range. The p;eneral Ratlam the range 901-1100 m.m. and Dewas, Shaja picturc is as below '--. pur and Jndore in the range 1001· t 100 m.m. Curi --- -- ously enough Dews and Shajapur receive about the Rainfall range N"u,lb er Proportions same rainfall. Even otherwio;e they look so much of town~ alike geomorophologically and ecologically. 1 2 1 3.7 The principal town in tbi'l region is Todore the throbbing commercial and industrial centre of the State. 701-800 3'l 11 01 801~900 27 826 Not \ ery long, its pleasantly 0=001 night3 had earned 901-1000 29 8 87 the reputation of Shat-e-Malwa. May be the most 1001-1100 55 16 82 copious rainfall it receives among all the other dis 11 01-1200 47 14 37 trict headquarters in these two divi<;icns had some 1201-1300 27 8 26 thing to do with this apart its 10ca1joJl en the pla 1301-1400 64 19 57 teau-land of Malwa. 1401-1500 24 7 34 1501-1600 9 2 75 3.8 25 district headquarters get covered in these 1601+ 9 2.75 .,' ranges and once we touch u;:on the district head Total 327 10000 quarters of Bhopal, Hoshan,!!al'ad, Jabalpur, Bilaspur, Raipur and Bastar Divisions, they all fall in the ranges over 1001 m.m. The distrkt headquarter'! of Bhooal Division falls in the 3 ranges of 1001-1100, 1101- 3.12 Largest number of towns (64) fall in the rain 1200 an(1 1201-1300. Of the 5 district headquarters range 1301-1400 m.m. These make 19.57 per cent of Rajgarh receives the Iea"t rainfall. Ii is curious to of the total number of towns. These are followed by 55 'lee Chhindwara, which used to be covered bV in tree towns which fall in tht! ra:nfall range 1001-1100 m.m. not very long ago, now ora.:kete,i with Raigarh in the Their proportion comes 10 16.82. fhtn come 47 rainfal1 range of 1001-11 )0, Il\cidentallv Chhind towns (14.37 per cent) which fall in the rainfall wara receives the same rainfall d'l RaiJ!arh. 1f veJ!e rang~ 1101-1200 m.m. The 36 town., making a pro tatiot1 is c,omething to do with the rainfall then, the' p'ortion of 11.01 fall in the lowest rainfall range of position of Chhindwara vis-a-vis Raigarh is not very 701-800 m.m. These are followed' by 29 towns falling clear to under~t[lnrl. fl\'h,l cm(l Vi~i'lha towns are in tho:: rainfall range of 901-lO00 m.m. and 27 towns 12
11"0 I--!IIHI !lOI-·101l11 lonl-1100 1101-121Hl ------. ------_ .... _------~(7) t~(2) ~~ (I) ::::~(6) tt;n(I) f\tq(lo) ~r(3) 1f~(I) ~(9) ~(I) ~(3) ~;rr(I) ~ (4) Jf'I'IT (2) ,"", (1) ~(2) ~~(9) '3'~(I) ~"r~"r (1) Jfr'l"~ ( 1 ) ~. (2) ~(I) ~(2) ~(1) ~l~( I) ~(2) ~(2) ~I~ (I) ~(5) mAT (7) ~ (2) m(2) '!JT< ( 4) ~~(5) ~m-(9) ~~(2) rrfiF;p{T ~ ( 3) ~(1) ~l; (3) ~(2) Ri~ (I) ~1' ~(2) 'l~"r~(S) ~(2) ~(4) an: (7) ~_(2) 'IfTrn'«f ( I ) ~(3) ~tt (I) TJ"f f~Jfr~ ( 4) ~ffrn( I) f;rf~( 3) '(11 "qr f"l'1l'f': f.mJrr(I) i¥l'(I) ~(3) (:!) J(_1:otr ( I ) ~(IR) i~ (4) ~trmmnr' ( 2) f;r~( I) .i'llOfi"''''' (3) ~qrp(l) ------:16 27 29 55 47 ------120ld300 1301-1400 14a)-lS00 I 501-)600 160 I + tt;n (3)l JITII'~ ( R) it~ (2) ;m:nm: (2) ~mm~(2) 64 !I .... 3. 13 l'fit l.fit ,;,fr.~riY;H ~'!rr ~ fro ~':-ll if; R ~if'T if it' 7 tjirf;"i'If'>: if Jf~i:t, : ,,~ 'for ;,!~'l'f '~~r if )r1 ;~ I f$i! sit!>: if :;;:ri:t ~" ,,'f&"'f: ,,!lJTlf<'t"r if tigiT1i~If~ it lif!:7'li lflfT lfrffr ~ ..h ~ it it'f1 '6 ~'i ~rm- ~.ft<: ifI!rt ~Jfr 901-1000 if~Mr ~Il.fi'i ;q'~ ~ fif, fll'.lfr. ~fUif' ifI!rt lfr'f~ t. I "("T~r--;if<{rlT:if' if '3'lirfl ",rlfi=r ;:rqfj IIhi f'1't if r:::iTF -';1' ~h il'i; ".1' ~-~ ~~);: ,::pr'" ;;flTrl.fT orr h-'f~:l"ifi lflri ifrft t 1f'~f'fi "it."r. lJ:~r 'i;'R: rritifJ if 'PIT~....n ;fi'ff ~ fif, l.f~r 'l'>: t;F;ii '{tlt 'Iii ,!~!J 'li1 7 1Jf' ~:;;;ji '{ol"il'U ~ I ifrffl' ~ I f~f'g" if 'l.:j'i I (l ;:r,p; f"i'~"flf ~i ·~... r if ~ I tanfur·n:: flr~ if tiI',fH>: .n-:- 11;,1'7 if;: rr if' il"r- ·~uft if f;;'JiI'i"fl1 -.{uf, ~ !II'ffl ~ 31')": f"'l~ • :; ~:i"-f if ~ :l Of~ 0f'1f1 ,:r'r ~ I 1'§ifI:'!">: nriiT ~ ~>: if "Ilirir tiftilfi lfTrt ~"rrit t 'it .~I ~1fllf': 70 1-I!O 0 "[lifT 3 'if.-< ,,~i ~,f; IH 1-900 if amr ~. I qqT- .ltT.- 1101-1200 if IIHr ~I "'SI'f if; 2 ;:r;r1' :HIf'i' af'1T rom~ ~"'fol ;(. 'I~f f;;r.,.., iliff "1'rlll'l"~ f;l.ff~ ~ ~, 6 'fl('~f ~ Jf "'11' 'If:11''l: 'f'ri-~.Jfr 1101-1200 f'f.'fl. 3ft>: 120 1-l3()O flr.1l'T. 12 each falling in the range of 801-900 m.m. and 1201- State. 9 tnwns each lie in the two upper mo<,t Tal"f~ll 13CO m.m. These respectively constitute 8.87,8.26 ranges. 1501-1600 m.m. and 1600. TheSe each ~ and 8.26 per cent. As we go up in the rainfall 2.75 per cent. The details of these towns is given range, the number of towns deere·ases. Thcre arc 24 towns in the range 1401-1400 m.m. rainfall and in the table below. The figures in parenthesis indi these constitute 7.34 per cent of towns in the cate the number of towns in the district. --_._------_----- 701-800 801·900 901·1000 1001-1100 1101-1200 Morena(7) Gwalior(2) Guna(1) Tikamgarh(6) Guna(}) Bhind(10) Shivpuri(3) Mandsaur(l ) Chhatarpur(9) C!t hatarpur(l) Gwalior(3) Guna(l) Ratlam(4) Satna(2) panna(1) Datia(2) Mandsaur(9) Uiiain(J) Sidhi(l) Sagar(1) Shivpuri(2) Uiiain(l) Shajapur(2) Ujjain(l) D amoh(l) Mandsaur(2) Shajapur(2) Jhabua(1) Shajapur(S) Satna(7) RatIam(2) Dhar(2) Dhar(4) Dewas(5) Rewa(9) Uiiain(2) West-Nimar(3) Indorc(l) lndore(3) Dewas(2) Jhabua(l) East-Nimar(2) West-Nimar(8) Rajgarh(2) Jhabua(4) Dha.r(2) Rajgarh(2) East-Nimar(4) Bhopal(l) Rajgarh(3) Tndore(l) Vidisha(l) Sehore(1) Vidislla(3) West·Nimar(2) Morena(I) Betul(1) Raisen(3) Chhindwara(18) Betul(4) Hoshangabad(2) Bilaspur(1 ) RajnaDdgaon(3) Raipur(l)
36 27 29 5S 47
-.------~-.- ---- 1201-1300 1301·1400 1401-1500 1501-1600 1600t ------Guna(J) Sagar(S) Sehore(2) Balaghat(2) Hoshangabad(2) panna(l) Damoh(l) JabaJpur(7) BiJaspur(2) Balaghat(2) Sagar(2) Shahdol(15) Mandla(3) Raipur(2) Raigarh(S) Damoh(l) Uiiain(l) Seoni(2) Bastar(J) Rajgarh(1) Dewas(1) Surglija(4) BhopaJ(l) Raisen(1) BiIaspur(4) 9 Sehore(1) Hoshangabad(9) Raigarh(1) Raisen(2) Jabalpur(2) Raipur(l) Jabalpur(6) Narsimhapur(1 ) Narsimhapur(3) Mandla(t) 24 . Durg(6) BaJaghat(1) --- Surguja(4) 27 BiIaspur(6) Rajnandgaon(2) Durg(4) Raipur(6) Bastar(l) ----- 64 ------. -.. -.----.-~-_--.----.------3.13 It will be seen fJ:om this that of the 8 towns is most happily situated. Of the 6 towns, Ashoknagar of Morena 7 towns fall in the lowest rainfall range but receives the least rainfall which is less than that of Sheopur reCeives much higher rainfall than these and Gwalior. Mungaoli receives more than Ash(lknagar goes into the t:ainfall range 901-1000. It may be remembered that Sheopur area is the most wooded and just 6 m.m._ more than Gwalior. Chac,haura area in Morena district and it can be matter of Binaganj receives more tItan the abl)'ll~ mentioned surmise if Sheopur town gets any benefit from the towns, wherc~ Chanderi, Guna and Ragbogarh green surroundings. AU·the 10 towns of Bhind are in receive the same rainfall. . the lowest rainf~ll range. In Gwalior district Gwalior and Morar Cantonm<'-I\t receive a little more rainfall 3.14 AU the six towns of Tikamgarh district faIl in than the other 3 towns which lie 'in the lowest rainfall the rainfall a range 1001-1100 m.m. Of the 10 towns range. Both the towns of Datia district are in the lowest range and 5 towni of Shhpuri are distributed of Chhatarpur 9 towns fall in the same range. In by 2 and 3 in the, rainfall range 701-800 and 801- Chhatarpur district Bijawar receives the highest rain 900, respectively. In Ow-aliar division Guna district fall and falls in thc range 1101-1200. The two towns lRGI/86-6 13
it ilr~ ~ I ~lflT~ it 1137. 1 it; ~!!ITif 'H: .qm' i{ 1213. 5 fl:r.;fj 5 'fln:~, ~ !;!~ ~ f.ri ~ i{ m ifiIf qqf ~ffi ~ alP: _Il'i *(\'f ~, mIf1: f;;rllr it; 1 1 ifJlii it « ~~~T i{ iI'T fSMr 1 1 0 1~ i{ ~r6' ~ I ;:;r ~fifi 'IjrlT 8 '1'11<: crq\' q.arr 1 3 0 1- 1 400 fll.If')'. it 1200 flf.lft. if llT't ~, oriff'fo' 'Tlfq~ li1'l:: q"l1'~ ~eAije tiP.!' ~ I ~;ri{ « 7 it 1 3 9 -l flf.1ft. qql m;fr ~,oriffifi ~cro it 224 i f;r.lf(. qql mo:a' ~ f..-~ it ~ 'l'{i vf'l1 <:r~ll' 'H it ~iffr Ifiil'it lfiIf t.JiT 701-800 f;r.i1I'., 9 l!i't<-iT qosIT ~'1[f 130 1-1 400 flf.lfr iT ~ r9' ~ I #:s';r 'l; 4 '1'11''.:1 'flfl:: qfit ~~Jfr SO 1-900 flf.1I'1'. 3(n: 1 iflfl:: qqf ~ar')' 90 I-} 000 it~, 3 ifl1',!; em ~'Ift 1401-1500 fl'f.+JT. it crl.fT fsuitD" it lJiT« fll'lI'T it -q'r~ ~ r li~q:T'l: 'l; "'If~:r "flf<1 it ITiT;ff~ ~ Oir~ ~'t Wl'IT 1 S i{I1<: em iPfTlf ar~'f 'filf 'If."fi ~Tft ~ aftl:: n€r f;r~; 'llJiT ~ lir?!' ~, ;:;rtfif\' Wlf ~: 1001-1100 it i:T~f I ~ ~ffi' ~'i§ ahrf~y :a-mr ~m ~ 4 CMT ·~iJfr 901-1000 I'i:pft. it '4ir't ~ r ~"~if f..-~ ;r, ....+i'r iflTi.~"t ifEfT ~ I flJ:f;:j'f if; qqf 'llufr 801-900 f;r.lfr. it, ~lJ~r 901-1000 flf.m. a~ ci'rlJl::T G);fiifi!1: ';{U ;rl::j[ ~ 'I:I';;~T qr:;l .~.Jfr 1401-1500 i{ ,"T(l~1 ~ ') 01-1200 f;r.m. it m=rr ~ I lII'rorr'!'l:: it; 9 iflf>: t'IjT 80 I- iITffi"ilTe f..-iiI' iT l!iil'ft iflT'l:: it nfr 'fill' qq'r ~ci'r ~ ;:;rorf.JS' 'filf qql ~ ~ I ~qflJ flf'r if; l\ir9'lffif it 'T;rS' iifa-li qqi ~"tffi' ~ I iIT;;rr'iJTe f;r~ ~ qroflJ3.17 qql 'if; 1l'T1f'?r i{ ::R'T'!q'T ~ 6 if!f>:r it ~, m~T :fr f~fa 3. 20 'I'~'!..-r if; 8 iflf>: erqf qfllf1if 1301-1400 fl:r.1ft. ~ 'I:I';;'iJT ;r.ff ~, or;rfi.fi q-G1'Tfq~, ~Tifl1~, :;;).;rc aftl:: tnti1T ..;;~ 1401-1500 fll'.lfr. it ;r~I'I'\-'nT:rl:: ~a- s~ ~I fHrlJ~ i{ 13 "fll'~ ~ W-frn- iT ~ I ;;r.~:r ~p q'lr 'Pf '!:T~if ~ ~f1>:rjj':r: ;:rq-r m'!tlT til' -1 O!R ~;:rii ~ '(itffi ~~ 'PIf qfl'l' ~T ~ I !Til: erqf ~ 1 1 0 1- iffTTl ;r, ~ iT 'fil)'T OTT ... ~ ~ I m-'.: 'if; ... 1fO:ff 8 "flT>.: aifffJf 3 1200 f1:r. 1ft. it u.rm ~ r 6 iflT< 'f1'rt:or.Jft 1301-1400 fl'f.lfr. qqi ~fir,lf"f iT 'l:l'rlt ~ I ~;'fit 'l1:1l"1U ~ l'f~Tq;: it ;r.ri\' lfiIf ~ it ~ Ofl~ 4 if'R qqf..wr 1401-1500 fl:r.m. it ;v.ra- ~ I ~ ~, ~;rrn. afI;: on:m'!'l::-~T:jfIf~ it ~;rl!t ~'ft 'DP-.1'fo ll'r5T ern ifr;ft 2 iflT'~ if'IT iIT~QT'l; 3{F: 'l'l!i<:il qql ~aft 1501-1600 fir.1ft. Ii' ~, or.m;crl"'-f, mll''IT't, ~ ~ ~~:ft 'fliT '~iJfr '101-1000 fl:r.Il'T. VP.r ~ I ,~ if; 6 'f1f'U it, rnlf'l'f tarT ;j')'. iT mm ~ ;;r.tf'P ~ if'R ~;;if::tlf qq-f q"n. it ;o;rra- ~ I 1001-1100 flf.1ft. it ~A ~ I te:ll: it 'I1R aft'!: Il'~mq ~ nftl''fi crcfi ~ ~ I 'If'!''lflf f;r'lTW if; 1 3 iflJ'~ at!,:"!'&!' 3 cro '~farI'{1 if vr'r f ari<: iI'~!fT;fr ;rr;rr '!f'-lf'r mif-'T~ il'f!:i!f; lII'I~l'!: >.rIfT ~aft SO 1-900 it ~'-TT Il:'!;~'t, !iserf, ;f'lTifi!1: aiR qqf .: ~ 1301-1400 fl:r.1I'T. it '&'Ti:t f I ~. . 3. 1 S <:f lfiT~ f.;r'r 'if; S iflTn it ~ ;::rr~ if' mrit ~fg'f. 1205 ;r, 10 i{I1<: 2 ~T it ;i~ g~~-G '1'11<: 1201-1300 fJf.1ft. it flf.qT. q/{f Q)fI' ~ I U.;:lf iflT') it ~ 2iflT>: qqT ~ ~01-900 ~ 4 "fll'< 1301-1400 f;r.Jft. it .... Tff ~ I 'l::T~ f..-~;r, 10 'fln: flf.lft. it, 2 'f1J''; 1001-1100flf.l'ff. it <'I'': it f: iii' ",,",~;;frq it tmrr ~ I if,- 6 'l'1li'f it fl"'l'fu it I i{1fU it ">:Tm ~, ~tf;t1i'i{ ~'"F..T ~ ~ ~ 3. 22 irm it 4 iflT1: ~, ~ « if\'f'l;~ i{ lfof« ifilf 13 q -t flf ffi '~T 1101-1200 flr.tft. it (3 'f1R') 1201-1300 flr.lft. 'IT. qqr ~ ~ ~ 3 rt'1R : if; q'-!,T'( .'{<: fl:f ~I ~".f'T it .::wr 1501-160Q flr.J["t. it ma- . ~ I 13
of Patna-Ajaigarh and Panna fall in the ranges 1101- most fortull.ah~. Th~se to'\ns arc :;iluatctl in the rain 1209 m.m. and 1201-1300 m.m. respectively. Panna fall ranges JlOI-J200 m.m. (.t wwm.) 12UJ .. J~·OO receives 1213.S m.m. as against 1137.1 of Ajaigarh. m.m. (2 towns) and 1301-1400m.m. (1 town), Betul Sagar district has 11 towns of which RehH receives has 5 towns but curiously enm!gh Multai rccl.!ives U11! the least rainfall but which is higher than what least rainfall ~nd li\!s in th.: rainfal1 rangl!s JOOl- Ajaigarh of Panna r,~c.::ivl!'>. Khurai, Garhakota lying 1100 whereas the other 4 towns are located in the in th~ treeless plains area fall on the rainfall·.rarige rainfall range 11 0 1-1200. Hoshangabad district pre. 1201-1300 m.m. whereas the other 8 towns fall in sents quite a variety; Harda and Ranipur~ receive the the range 1301-14'00 m.m. Of these 7 receive the least minfall Jying jll the tninfalJ rar:gc J 111 J.l2'}!} same rainfall of 1394 m.m. while Deori receives m.m. Whe::-;;:a., Pachmarhi and Pachll1a~hi Canton the least rainfalJ. ment receive th: highest rainfall not only in the district but in th.:- who!:; State (2244 m.m). th\!sc are 3.15 The three towns of Darnall fall in the three the hill lowns and the summer capital of the State. rainfall ranges Qf 1101-1200 m.m., 1201-1300 m.m. The other 9 town.:> fall in the r .. inhll! runge 1301- •, and 1301-1400 of t.h~·;c Damoh receives the least raIG 1400 m.m . faIl and Patharia the bighest 3.1 9 15 towns of Jabaipur disllict are rJislribuh:d in 3 rainfall rangeJ 6 in 120:-1300 m,lll. 2 in ! jOt- 3.16 The towns of UJjain division are in the lower rainfa,l ranges. Th,! 12 towns of Mandsaur fall in 1400 m.m. and "1 in 1401-150U m.m. Whl!fl!aS 4 the ranges 701-800 (2 towns); 801-900 (9 towns) and towns of Narsimhapur lie iri 2 ranges-3 in 12U1-1300 and 1, Kareli-in the raInfall range 1301-1400 m.m. 901-1OUO m.m. (1 town). Garoth is the town receiv ing highest rainfall in the towns of Manusaur. Of Of the 4 towns of Mandla, 3 lie in the range 1401~ the 6 towns of RatIam, Jaora and Piploda· receive 1500 m.m. and Dindori, receiving the kast rainfall lies in the ~ower ranges 1301-14lJO Chhind~ much less rainfall than the other 4 lowest range or m.m. and wara slides down in the scale and hel'c all the 18 towns whereas tile other 4 lie in the range 901~lOOO m.m; lie in the rainfall !luge 100l-UrO. This (catw(' is a In Ujjain district, Khachrod and B~dnagar receive the little intrigu.ing for, generally speaking, Chhindwura least rainfa1l. ill towns of the district WhC.~·l; are 1 each in the rangc~ 8Gl-9DO m.m. 901-1000 m.m. and J 001-1100 . m.m. The 9 are not so fortunately located as t:o receive cqually good rainfall. Both the towns of SeoJlj are quite towns of Shaja0lr lie in the ranges 801~1100 m.m. happily located in the rainfall rarlgc t.10 1- : 50(1. In Here Soyat and Susner receive the least rainfall Kalin It 3!;t among the towns of the district. In Dl!was district Balaghat Kat.an.gi town rl'ceives the rainfall Khategaon revei-ves the highest whereas Balagnii and Bharbeli receive quite high rain rainfall. .. fall of 1672 m.m. or so. Waras(;oni :md Tirodi lowns 3.17 .Of the 6 towns of Jhaoua, Jhabua is the 1c:.d!'t of BaUighat district lie in the range 1501-1600 m.m. fortunate, Whereas, Pdlawad, Ranapur, Jobat and 3.20 'fhl.) 8 town.> {"If Surguja district are equally Thandla are the more fortunate ones. Alirajpur oould divided in the two ranges 1301-1400 m.m .. and he said lying bclwe.:n Jhabua and thes,; -1 towns as 1401-1500 m.m. In Bilaspur there are 13 towns and Ifar as a rainfall is concerned. AIl the eight towns of these MUllg-eii receives the least rainfall. It is of Dlwr lie ill the 3 lower rainfall rang~s. Here !>ituatcd iJl the range llOL-1200. 6 towns are locat Dharampuri and Manawar receive the least rainfall, ed in range 1301-1400 m.m. and 4 towns in range Bandawar and S"ardarpllr-Rajgarh receive a little more 1401-1500 m.m. whereas 2-Naya Baradwar and while Bagh, Dhamnoo, Dbar and Kuksbi He in tbe Sakti-are situated in the rainfall range 1501-1600 range 901-1000 m.m. Of towns of Indore, Sawer receive m.m. Of the 6 towns of Raigarh, Sarangarh located the least la~nh!l, Dl.:palpur a l~.·I~ I';ore. whcr\!as, in the arid treeless plains, receives the least rainfall Indore MIlt}W and Mhc\vgaoD lie in the minfall and is situated in the range 1401-1500 ro.m. Whereas range iOm-l!OiJ; Indore receiving more than Hho\V tbe rest of the towns are sitl1ated in the highest and Mhowgaon, 13 towns of We.st-Nimar.lie ill th~ 3 rainfall range. lower rainfall range and Barwam and Ra1Pur recelve the least rainfall. 6 towns of East Nimar lie in the 3.21 In Ihi1)ur division, Rajna·ndgaon di!.tIlct range 801-lOC~), whl.. Burhanpur 3Jld ~hahpur in though situated in the .p~lldy-growiJ?g high rainfaU the range 901-900 and Ha!ISud, Khandwa, Nepanagar belt is not so fortl1l1ate III resp'Cct of Its towns. Of the and Mundi lying in the range 901-1000 m.m. 5 towns, 3 are located in the ranj!;.! 1101-1200 m.m. whereas 2 W ov.. r to the rang~ 13(l1-}t10{) nun. 3.18 Of the 8 towns of Rajgarh district, Biaora the 10 to~ns of Dnrg arc distributed in two receives the highest rainfall of 1205 m.m. The other ranges-6 in 1201-1300 m.~. and ~ i~ 1301-14flO ~.m. towns are situated in the rainfall ran~~.' 801-900 Of the 10 towns of Ralpuf dlsWct Sarmpalt TI' m.m. (2 towns), 100l-lIOO m.m. (2 towns) 1101- -~ives the least rainfall of 1188 mm. of the rest. tt 1200 m.m. (3 towns). In . the 4 towns Of. Vidisha towns situated in the ranges 1301··1400 mm. 1 m district. Sironj receives the least rainfall Wilde other 1401-100 m.m. and 2-Maha.;amund arid Bagbahara three lie in the range llOl-1200mm. Of the;: towns of are situated in the range 1501-1600. Bh'opal di.strict. Bhopal rcceivt,~ m(lrc than "'d;:.l~a. In Sehore district Ashta receives the )cast ralll. 3.22 III Bastar, there are 4 towns of these Kanker Whereas, Seherc a~d NarsuHangani !:I~<.3.23';;riI'f.J;' ~'ii iR'fi ifi'f aiR: oi'iIrt att{ ~ 61;'fi ~ ili Si1ITif 3. Z 7 Cfl'I1"lf.1I' ~ #firn' "'iftmir 'liT ~ !iliflfiI (1m Fm' ~ ~ ~. ~ m Q,'Ii em; ifit' am: ~ m:q; ~ ~1ifI GIl ~m- ~ I i'l'fi ~ if; <:I41r4,Wa1 .foiTij!ATff~ 17. 7%~ 35°1-40° i.i. it ~ if Q t ~ 3. 4%~ 40.°1-45° 3. 25 :f1J'U it; 11>"1 'liT ~Itr.f,l'f f.Nfii1~ 'li<:ir it i itq ~ ;;iT fIf; 11'~ ~ I m't<'fr qi;rllft it; 'iiII'. ~ ~«if; snrrOJ' ~ I "1 I ij' 'R eft crm»r SMTfifff rn ~ ~ ~ lIiT<'fr fir¥r m 1JTif (29° 7ij. ~.) If1l.tt 25.0m 25.1-30 30.1-35 35.1-40 40.1-45
____ ". ---- 1 2 3 4 5 6
i. fillffil'i'- 1 1. ~r-8 1. ~;r-3 1. in'~T-5
2.~-2 2. f'll'q"-lO 2. tm:-'l 2. ~~-5 3. 1liIf~-3 3. t.ro-9: 3. If''{,,-1 3 4.~-2 4. 'UlI';~-1 ------5. ~-6 5.~-6] 11 6. Wer
3.23 Wh'!l\:as there, may be some unc;t~rt~inty re redish sandy soils and exposed laterites (Bhantha garding the relationship between fesest and altitude land) over large areas. on tbe one sid_e. and rainfall on the other, there appears to be :Q,O such doubt· regarding, relation bet 3.26 The. forest and particularly the dense semi ween forest and altitude on the one side and tempera evergreen forests play a definite role in modifying ture on the other. The temperature figures of the temprature. Large sheets of water also controls the towns may pres~nt a better perspective when viewed temprature and in this respect the great Bhopal lake from this angle. and the Gandhi Sagar dam infiiience the tempratme of Bhopal and Gandhi Sagar towns.
3.24 Madhya Pradesh is a sprawling State. Its northern and southern boundaries are separatell by . 3.27 One intri~ing feature of temperature statis about 500-600 kms. of direct distance while the tics may be mentIoned. The newspaper reports in northern exttcme-Ambah town-and the suut.hern the years through the decades under review often 'extreme Kirandul are f.1~parated by over J ,100 kms. indicated highest temperatures in Raigarh town and The effect of latitude is thus definitely seen in the those who have experience oJ. summer of Raioarh0 towns of the State, and the northern parts are to~ will bear this out. Similarly coldest nights in colder t.han th~ southern area. WInter months have been experienced in Raisen town. The temperature statistics given in this volume do not bear this. The possible explanation could per _ 3.25 Elevation play important rart hl regulating haps b~ that these statistics have been based on the temperatw:;; of the towns. This is \'!\"ident from average daily· temperature. Gaurella and Pachmarhi registering lower tempera tures, the town'> situa_ted in the middle southern por- tion like B~:ul, Sconi, Chhi:ldwra are cooler than the 3.28 The 326 towns (data for one town i e towns situatetd in the northern and north western part. ~~rwani is not available) of the State get c1assifi~d The geological and wH c0nditions also govern the lllto only four ranges in respect of maximum tempe- temperature. TQ_wns situated on predominently black rature. About 88.0 peT cent of the town get in- soil tend to have more amenable temperature than eluded in the range 30°. 1-35° Centigrade. 7.7 per those situat~d in the region with sandy soils. The cent of the towns fall in the range 35·. 1-40° centi- later show more extreme. 111e reason for this is quite, grade. ~hereaso3A pe~ cent go in the temperature obvious. The black clayey soil has greater moisture range 40. 1-45 rentngrade. The lowest maximum retentivity and thus modifies temperature variation temper'atU!re is r~rded by the summer capital of the to a great extent. It may be seen that temperature of State, Pachmarhl, the queen of the hill station and the towns situated at the -!\Aalwa plateau the contiguous Panchmarhi cantonment. Gaurella sit- does not rise very high, While areas in the uated at the foot of the Maika! range and below north in Gwalt.:>r· and erstwhile Vindhya Pradt'sh Amarkantak also records a law maximum tempera- region, even though they are situated in high~'r lati- ture of 29.7°C. The two insets given below show the tudes become much hotter. The towns of Chha!tis" num~er .of t!>wns in the four temperature ranges and garh plain become very hot due to lower elevation, the dlstnctwlse number of towns so included :- DISTRIBUTION OF TOWNS BY DIFFERENr RANGES OF MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE
No. of towns ------NIL 3 281 25 11 NIL ._------._._-326 ------DISTRIcr WISE DISTRmunoN OF TOWNS IN DIFFERENT MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE Below 25.1-30 30.1-35 35.1-40 40.1-4-5 45+-- 25.0 -----~~~------~--~~------~------~------1 2 3 4 5 6 .. -_---.~ ... --_.__ .. _ .-.-.-'_ -. -- _"_-'_' Nil 1. BiIaspur 1 1. Morena 8 1. Ujjain 3 I. Jhabua S Nil, 2. Hoshangabad 2 2. Bhind to 2.Dhar 1 2. Jabalpur 5 3. Gwalior 5 3. Rewa 9 3. Narsimhapur I 3 4. Datia 2 4. Raigarh 1 5. Guna 6 S. Tikamgarh 6 II 6. Chhatarpur 10 6. Shivpuri 5 7. panna 2 8. Sagar 11 2S g. Dll1l1oh 3 ._--_.. _------_--_._._------_ 2 4 5 6 ----_._------_.--•.. -._ ...•... _._ .._ ..•.....•... _...... -.. - ...... _ ...... _.. _... _.... _.. _ ...... _ •.•...... _•.. _.. _- ... _.- ...- ...... - "-"'_... -.-..... _---- I O. ~;rr.-9 II. ~:gT.;r~ 15 12. ~frtft-l 13. ;i~l<:-12
14. <:~-6 15. ~-31
16. ~~-9 17. ~-S'
18. m~-l 19. m<:-7 20. ~"t<:-5 21. qf~T fi{~-12 22· 'K""T f~.-6 23· <:l"OI~"_8; 24. fa;fl(m~8 25· "'fftrre-z' 26· «~-4i 27. ~ftf~-6~ 28· ~-5 2 9· ~1l'ilrrcr~-11' 30. G\;(~-i01l 31. i{~f~-3J
32. 1£~-14 33. f~~T-lS-~. 34. flf. 287
3. 2 9 ~ \lTq1iJi{ «~ 2 4 7 l:fT 75. 6 srfumr;:mJ 'liT l!;'Ii ~r 3. 30 ai!f( f<{1f 'flf fiA'(OI' « Ifi{ ~ ~ fiI; ~I f*r ~ ~ l5'.1-200 «.iI.ij;atCl1fflqmr~ I 42~~ 20.1+it ij; iftR1' it ilT'f1Wf 'liT «.t ~ ~J ~ ~ ~ if 2 3 4 5 6 _.... _.. ------. --~---.~ -- .. --~---- _----_._._-_ .. __ . __ ... _-_--_. __ .. _------_--_.. _--_._----- 10. Satna 9 11. Shahold 15 12. Sidhi 1 13. Mandsaur 1.2 14. Ratlant 6 15. Ujjain 3 16. Shajapur 9 17. Dewas 8 18. Jhabua 1 19. Dhar 7 20. Indore 5 21. West Nimar 12 22. East Nimar 6 23. Rajgarh 8 24. Vidish3. 4 25. Bhopal 2 26. Sehore 4 27. Raisen 6 28. Hetul 5 29. Hoshangabad 11 30. Jabalpur 10 3\. Narsimhapur 3 32. Mandla 4 33. Chhindwara 18 34. Seoni 2 35. Balaghat 5 36. Surguja 8 37. Bilaspur 12 38. Raigarh 5 39. Rajnandgaon 5 40. Durg 10 41. Raipur 10 42. Bastar 4
287
3.29 In regard to the minimum temperature 247' towns thereof hardly experience any winter. As or 75.6 per cent of the towns cluster up i~ the ranges against this the towns of Shivpllri, Tikamgarh and 15.1.-20C. Forty two towns go into the range Rewa districts and also those of Jhabua experience 20.1-1C constituting 12.9 per cent. Thirtytwo towns quite a severe winter. constituting 9.8 per cent of the total number of towns are located . iIi ~he .. minimum. temperature range 5.1-10.0 and only five towns (1.5 per cent) ~. 30 It will be seen. fr()~ > the description given occupy the maximum temperature range 10·. 1.15.0°. a~ove t~at the towns of Ihabua district experience The towns situated in the eastern part of Madhya variation in temperature. Perhaps this may be ac Pradesh in, Bil;lspur, RaigadJ, Rajnal1dgaon and counted for the merciless destruction of forests in Raipur . district's all fall in minimum temperature this district. range of 20°. 1 +. Only Jashpurnagar of Raigarh does not fall in this line and records a minimum tempera 3.31 The number of towns districtwh·e for mini ture of 7.4°. The a1:love mentioned districts and the mum temperature range is given below :-
DISTRmUTlON OF TOWNS BY DIFFERENT RANGES OF MINIMUM TEMPERATURE _.. _--::----- Range of Minimum Temperature Number of towns (in centigrade) - ._------_._------_.. _------_.. _----_.... ------_._._-_._--_ .. _-_ ._-_ .. _-_ ..... _------Below 5 Nil 5.1-10.0 32 10.0-15 S 15.1- 20 247 20,1+ 42
Total 326 16
f~ il'rTlfr;1' ~'t fcrf~ sMarll'f it nri!r~ 1 ~s ~ 8 ~ 12 'l~ 9 ~ ~ 8 orm 4 m;.m- 1m: 7 lftIr 247
------
10 Ar 1I'T. 11.2Sflli 1I'T. 26. soAr 11'). 51. 100 f'tl'.1I'I'. - .:_-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ------~------I 1· II III - IV --0 V -- VI -~------
-----,,__------'------16
NUMBER OF TOWNS,'DISTRfCT-WISE BY D1FFERENT R4.NGES OF MINIMUM TE\fPER"-TURE ------5.1-10 10.1-15 15.1-20 20.1·-!------'-_- .. .-... .- .-.. .. ._ .. ,,_ - ...... __ ... _ ...... _.___..,_._- Raigarh 1 JJba1pur 5 .Morcn'l 8 BiliLspur 12 Shivpuri 5 Bhind 10 R:,igarh 5 Rewa 9 Gwalior 5 R'ijnandg'lOn S Tikamgarh 6 Datia 2 Ourg 10 Ujjain 4 Guna 6 Raipur 10 Jhabua 5 Chhatarpur ]0 --- Dhar Panna 2 ,., NarsirnhapuT Sagar II ---- Darnoh 3 32 Satna 9 Shahdol 15 Sidhi Mand;aur 12 Ratlam 6 Ujjain 2 Shajapur 9 Dewas 8 Jhabul! 1 Dhar 7 Indore .5 West Nirnar 12 East Nimar 6 Raigarh 8 Vidisha 4 Bhopal ~ Sehore 4 Raisen 6 Betul 5 Hoshangabad B Jabal pur 10 Narsimhapur 3 Mandla 4 Chhindwara ]8 Seoni 2 Balaghat '5 Surguja 8 Bilaspur 1 BastaI' 4 ---- 247
- ---"'---"--~----"-'-'~------'- .... _-_. __ ._--- _.. --_, -- _._. --, .. _._-_.,-_ .. ----_ -_.__ .'-:---_._-... _._ .. _-...... ------_ .. _.. _--_._------3.32 The number of t'owns nearest from cities by road arranged according to size class and in different distance range is as indicated in the following table :-- TABLE 12 (A) Distallce 0/ Towl1s from the lIearest city Name of city ---.-.--- .---- .. -. ----Ci~ss of·------TotaTN~-~----·-·-- -N~_;;b~r ~ft~_;.;~ whi~h ar;~ithin distance of towns of towns ------..,.. 10 11-25 26-50 51-100 101 !t Kms. Kms. Kms. Kms. above -_.. __ .. _.. -_._---___ ... _.. _----- 2 3 4 5 6 7 Allahabad 1 U III IV V Vl
Total 1 RGJ/8f>.···7 17
2 3 4 5 6 7 ------_ ------_._--_. __ .. _------_.-- -_._- 2_ f'lll';;nf IPI<: I 2 II III IV 4 2 t V VI
S 3 3 I II 3 2 III R 2 IV 14 2_ 2 1(1 V 14 ,; 7 VI ----.. ---.-.~.-.. ---... ------.------'---.~------._------_-_.. 40 4 12 24 ------_.__ ._------_._------_------... -----~---.---;-- 4. f;r~ I II 2 2 III 2 1, N 8 2 2 V s 7 VI 1 ' ' .. _---- .... _-_ .. __ . 21 3 12 I II III 1 IV V VI ._------_._----_.__ .. _--_._--_._-----_._------3 ------6 1ft I II III IV V VI
6 2 2 -----_.--_--_.-.. - -- ,,_- ---_._---'.- _----._._.__ ---... ..------._----_ ----_._- --_.- -__ .------~--- 1 II 3 Ul :I IV 8 5 V 5 4 1'" VI
19 10 4 ----.------~-.--- ~------....,...:._~ ....___,.---. -_. __ -----_-..,..._- __ ... -----;,""'_-'- _---- I II 2 [[J 6 :J 3 IV U -1 9 V 1 S 3 5 9 VI
49 2 10 17
______--- .-~---...... ----.---.---.------.---.------~-.-----~------.-.-I!!----.------~-~.:'--.--'..._- ______. .2 J 4 5 678
~. BhHainlllat r Z 11 I m I IV 4 V VI
Total 8 3 ..t 3
3. Bhopal I II 3 .2 1Il 8 .2 IS IV 14- 2 to V 14 7 VJ J I
Total 40 4 12 14
4. BUaspur I IT 2 m 2 I IV 8 2 2 .J V 8 7 VI 1 '._-- -.__ ."--"'-' - .. '.-- '-_----'---'-- .--_-_._-_..• ------_'.'.- ----_._--_._-----_._- '_'--'-- Total 21 3 4 12
5. Burhanpur . 1 1 .. 1 II HI 1 TV V VI _-_._----_._.. _-----_.. _------_... _------_._---- Tota) 3
6. Durg 1 1 n' 1· m 1 IV V 3 2 V[
Total 6 1 2 2
7. ·~;'\ali ..H I II 3 III 3 ::! IV ~ , \' 5 4 \'! ------.------TlIta) 19 1 1 3 10 -4 -----_.------_------I -., Jl ... 1 m G 3 j JV 13 9 V 18 3 "5 9 VI
fota) 40 2 4 21 ... ---. '_', -.. -._. --- ._._._. -. -..... --"-_------_ ... __ ._------_ ... _. _------18
---~----- 2 3 4 5 6 7 . 8 ._-_._---.. I 1 II 3 1 ill 8 2 4 IV 16 2 1 12 V 11 5 5 VI
39 1 2 4 9 23 --_._---._------.,__.-.~ .. -----.------_----, ------"_---_' ------.. ----.-~- ---- _.. -_._---- 10. tmfr I 1 II 2 III 1 IV Ii 4 1 3 V 13 8 5 VI 1 -_ .. _._------_._-- --_._. __ ._.-.- .. _------_._- 26 1 11 10
11.~ I II III IV 2 VI ------_...... ,------,------_. ----~------.r------.-- 3' --...-~------~---- 12.~ I II 2 III 3 1 2 IV 5 1 4 V 9 9 VI 2 2 _lIIl ___,.- ______---____'______.-e-.-!'~---
~ 21 2 19 ,_------_._--_,...... -. -.--.-~------._-- 13, ~~ I II :2 1 III 3 2 1 IV 12 2 4 6 V 2 I VI --_._---_.- ---_ _,._------.--.- _._----- 20 :.I 10 ------_._---_._-----:------I II III IV 1 V 1 VI ------~------2 ------_._------_._-----_.. _------_._--. 15.~ I II 2 III I IV 6 6 V 6 -1 VI .------~------15 1 ______._. ______.---;---_____ of"-___- ______._. --- 18 ------2 3 4 5 6 7 . 8 r 1 3 I "III t; 4 IY 1(, 2 12 V II 5 VI ---,.------_.. __ ----_._ ------_._----- Total 19 4 9 _. _____. ______-c_ -----.. ____.. ______~ __ ~-_--_--
10. JhS'hj 1 11 2 lIT IV 8 4 3 V 13 8 5 VI I 1
26 -1 It 10 ._----_.- .. --_ .. _------_._.. __ .. _._------_ .... -...... _-_. __ .. _ 11. Kh3.n-iwa II III TV V VI ------__ ._------_._--_- 3 ______Total o ___4 • ______
I:!. Nagpnf I II :! 2 HI 3 2 IV 5 4 V ') 9 VI 2 2 ------:-~------Total ____21 -.0 ____ -_ .. -.. _- _____" ___ . ______2 19 _
13. Raipur I ] 11 2 I ll1 3 2 I IV 12. 2 4 6 V 2 1 1 -_._-_.__._._------VI -----_. _._._-_-._-_._- ._-.--- Total 211 .~ 8 10 _,_---_._-.- .... _-,,-_. __ .__ ...... ---_._-- .. _--_":- .. _------_._-_. 14. bl1Chi IJ ill IV 1 I V 1 VI ---.. --~------_._ ---.------.. ------,
15. Ratlam I II .., III 1 IV 6 f, V 6 4 VI
TlIt:tl 15 JJ 19 ------_.------_. ---- ._---_------.-.--- --_._------1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ------... ------_._------_._------_---- _... _------I II III 3 2 IV 8 1 ::I 4 V 13 2· 5 5 VI ------.--~- 25 2 7 '9 7 ------_._ ----_-_ .. _------.... --- I 2 II III 4 2 IV 8 4 3 V 3 VI ------.. _--- 18 1. 4 7 5 ------~r_------It!.~ I 2 2 II I In 3 2 IV 6 5 V 7 3 3 VI ------_._------/- -. -~- ---,-- 19 3 3 ------__ .-- -__ .. "- , fflW 12· (an) t..m ~ ~ ifIn: lIlT rU -_--._-----_.------_... _--_ .. __ ._------._------,------'------rU it; 'IT~;hr 'foro ttfr ~!ii'.lT
10 f.t;.1ft 11-25 fij;. m. 26-50 f.!i.~. 51-100 f~~ ~_ 101 fiI;'. ~r. ~~!IlN4i 3 ------_._--_._------2 4 5 6 3 .1 2 2 4 3 2
1 l' 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 2 4 If"'-T
~tf~ 2 4 4 lfI'iT~ 5 2
.~ 2 2 5 '{Icn 2 3 3 ~~ 'l 7 2 19
1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 16. Rew!l. J 11 1 1 If[ 3 2 IV ~ 3 4 V 13 '- 5 I \,1 ----. ------4------.,._.,.Total 25 ------_.---2 --..,------7 9 --- 7 17. Sagdr T 2 2 II 1 1 TIl 4 2 1 IV \ 8 4 3 1 V 3 1 1 VI
Tata] 18 i 4 7 5 _----- ~------... ------18. Ujj:!.in I , 1J 1 TIl 3 ) 2 IV 6 1 5 \' 7 1 3 3 VI _-- --_.------_ -_...... _--_. ------_.. _ ------,------Total 19 3 ------13
T -'BLE l2(B)
D;vtrlllce a/T(lwlI /ram the Dirflief IIra~'q("'''r.rs
N1n:' O!f Djstri~t Hcu,iL1ulllrters lo\\n Number of t~1wn~ withiu , ---.------10 Km~. 11-25 :!6-S0 51-100 lOl- Km~. Km<;. l< ms. kms. and abo"e ._------.. ------.. ~------3 4 5 6 ------~------.------_- ---- 'i.:lrena 3 2
Bhind 1 2 4 Gwalior. 2 Dalla 1 ')hi\ puri . 2 1
(",UIU 2 likamgarh 3 Chhatarpur 4
Pall'l:} Sagar 4 Dam:th Satna
R,!I\a • I 3 Shahd"l . 7 2 20
2 3 4 5 6"
,-
3 6
2 2
2 3
2 J
2 3
1 1 2 2
1 "'
2 2
4 6
\ 4
5 3 fcrfurr 3 3 ;fr(to:
~;:r 4
oi~ 2 2 3 ~ 3 5 3 ~ 2 2 5 ';'(~,!1: 2 'Ii-nrT 2
~ 12 5 f«-ft " " "I
~ 2
"fMjifl~~
~1: 2
~
2
_ --_ ..__ .. _._._-_.- ... _------.- _
3. 33 'i~ lffi:Vft "" till: ,~ ~ffi ~ ~ ~, ~ $Il€t t'l 152 lfl 46. 5 ~ ~ 'I!~ "" 101 fi!;.~. ~ 'liT "J~, ~, ~ 11>1' .n~ Qf;p.f 'fR ij.!I.f.i4ifi ~~ qftrfi ~ on: ~~ ~ I ~ 8 ~ ~U ~ III fifi.lIft. ifI') <'flIrT ~~ «I"r::'I' UT~ i:\-1ands!lhajapur 2 4
D~w:.s 2 3
Jhabua 2 .! Dhar S l IndcHc 2 2 Khargone 4 6 Khandwa 4 Rajgarh . 5 3 Vidisha 3 Bhopal
Raisen 4
P.~tul 2 2 H,lshangabad . 3 1 5 3 Jabalpur 2 2 5 5 1 Nf1.rsimhapllr 2 M:tndla 2 Chhilldwar.l 1 12 5 Sconi Balaghat 2
Ambikapur 5 Bilaspur 2 1 3 4 3 R.aigarh • 1 2 2
R.~jnandgaon 1 2 1 Durg 2 3 2 3 Raipur 2 6 1 Jagdalpur 1 2 ------3.33 It will be seen from this table that Bhopal, Uttar Pradesh. 152 or 46.5 per cent of the towns the state capital, Indore, the throbbing industrial are situated at distance of 101 kms. lUld above from and commercial heart of the State, and JabaJpur, the cities. Only 8 towns are situated within 10 kms. the bubbling railway and defence production comp from city. Cities are usually like baniyan trees plex serve as the centres, round which largest cluster not allowing urban centres to develop of towns of the state are located. In fact 36.4 per cent of the towns cluster around these three cities at near themselves. That more towns tend to develop various distance as shown in the table. 15.3 per cent by themsel"es and away from the influence or of the towns fall in th" ~"1.fluence range of the State, impact zone of the cities is clear from tIle following the largest number coming under Jhansi city of inset ;- 1 R.GD86-1 ::!1
------~------10%.m. 11-2S%.l{t . 26- 50 % .l{T . 51-100W.l{t • 101 f~.l{ . +
2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 4 14 4 3 45 13 S 11)8 33 0 1~2 -16 5
------_ -- -_- ..
3.34 1971 if ~ lfTlfT tl'7fr fif; ~ ~ ftt.I~ 250 If'I'if ~ ~T ;;rr Wfi"fI' ~ f.!; ~;r if1rU ij; 5 ~ if 9" ~ 59 ~ ;m: 100 fiI; lit. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ if ~ ~m ~ 26 for; 1ft. ~ ritI!i if lI",if ~ I q",\iI' ~ ft'ffu' ~ f.ti 327 ~l if 9" 46 5 ~ ~ I l'I1I<: 101 f.ti.;fr. ~ ~ if\T ~ P}ai'f if ",~ t I ~ 33. 0 "5IfumI ;m: f;;m ~WIi ~ 51-100 fir;.liT. ~ iU ~ ~ ft'«T ~ I ~ ..rr ~lf t f1I; f;;rm ~ ..rr ~ ~ ~ I W
wmit 13(W) 4.~~ ;m: 11ft ~ it Ill' IJ:tt ~~,~--5,768
1. "!~- (I ) (2) ~1:(Rlf, mf-8,897 1 fiI;.;fr. 0I!i 2~ 5fit;.m. 28 2 ~iR"-16,R47 69" 10fil;.1fi". 14 119" lsfiI;.1{r. 11 11' ISf.li.1fr. 16~ 25fit;.m. ' 29 269".m:~ 114 16~ 2sfit;.m
196 21
7lJllm'>(Jr OIId PrlJportion of Tolt/ns sitl/ate:! Itithin tl,e niflQllce Rallge from thf City ----,_,..-_ .. - - ...... -__..._----- ...... ------.... -- 101+ ------K 11-25 26-50 51-100 No. of Percentage No. of Pcrc.entage No. 01 Percemace Nl.ol P.:r.::entag~ Na.OIf Percentage towns [0,\-n5 to I\n, t()Wn~ tOWJl!l ------_._------~--45 13.8 108 33-0 152 46.5 8 2.4 14 43 ------_....-._._...... ,__....,._-----_.....,,------3.34 In 1971 it was observed that about 59 per TADLf 13 ('\) TOWNS NOT CONNEcrED BY RAIL cent of the then existing 250 towns came in the dlS tance range 100 kms. and above. As things are Distan.;e fc.)m .he nearest lall head today 46.5 per cent of the 327 towns are in tbe dis------Up t() 1 km. . __ "tance range 101 kms. and above. Whereas, 33.0 per 1 tG S kms. 28 cent of the towns are situated in the distance range 6 to 10 krus. • 14 11 to IS kms. • 11 51-100 kms. from the district headquarters. It Olay 16 to 25 kms.. 29 be rememberei that the district headquarters them 26 and alxt ... e • 114 selves are also included. Actually speaking they 196 should be excluded from the consideration which It may be seen that 58·2 per cent of these town would mean there are only 8 towns which are in the are situatetd at a distance of 26 kms. and above from distance range 10 kms. of the dbtrict headquart'ers. the nearest railway station. In fact such towns arc contiguous stretch and have TAB If' 13(B) been considered as separate town on account of r.)W.~3 N')f C')N"fECTED BY BU3 R.OUTE different status i.e. municipality, corporation and DlStance fr.,m the Na.m~. statusand populati(Jn of nearest busroate the ttlwn IN.. t connected by cantonment. These are Morar and Sagar Cantt. bus route) Madhogarh, Betul Bazar, Jabl:llpur Cantomnent, 2 BharbeIi, Sirgiti and Bbiiainagar. Up to! 1 kn,. :z to 5 kms. 1. Jabalpuc Gantt.(CB)-61,02 6 2. Pa.chm:uhi C.llltt.(CB) -9,546 3.35 131 towns of the State (40.1%) are con 3. Sagar Centt.(CB) -32,709 nected by railway and the rest 196 towns i.e. 59.9 4. Ordanance factory Areas, Katnl(CT) -5,768 per cent are not connected by the ruilway so far. 6 t.J 10 kms. (I) N..::w KatRi R.1.1Iway Fortunately, all towns are connected by bus service. ]"l;ti'):l Ar':l,(Cl') Katni 8897 These 196 towns which are not connected by rail 11 to IS kms. (it) Morar Gantt. (CD) 16847 senice arc situated from the nearest railway station 16 tl' 25 kms, as shown in tbe following inset table. ?b klns olnd ab<:tv~ 4. 1 ~ III it ~ 1978-79 tF f<;rt!; ~ 11mlIT ~ 2 3 4 ~ « ~;;ffim' ~ t: 1 ~ fiiIcrw it 42 ;mJ « ~"'f9'er ~ ~ ;f; f.re'N ~ mnaf ~ ~ lffiVl' ~ ~ ~ 10 Rroit >;!T'f ~-~ ~ ~ 'l"I!' t 1 ~ 285 'fIrif ~ ~ f.I;tn' tf1I1 ~ 1 f.Im: ';j'T{ ~ I -lit I'I11'U iiii' ,~ fir'fll' 9~a'fl' ~I( ~ it; flftfl'1f ~ ;iT .~.1Ii.4.I'f 1979 it !Il'lf ;riff it '" t ~~I 2 l4Ilf~~ 'SfTCi'I~ f.fro; t(l:t ~ I 3 ~ q'~-"I'fnf~ ;pn: 1ffiI. ~~ ~ 1 '1 . 2 3 4 4 lmr ~-~ mta "l'(t I 1 qf(li'l\J(~' ';f1R ~~ firro: ';j'T{ 1 ~~i!(f~1 5 IIf €r-'lir~ if1tff~ifi f.rOW1'l1 II ~~ qf(.i)\J(~1 ~ Q~ if.TIf otit !fi( ~ ~ I ~ f.tlm' ~ ~ I ift .~.ifi' .-;rr;i 1979 it III qfi(li)""~1 ~ m.--~ 6 ~ ~~.~~I ~~I '1f1:r ~--m~ ~ I 2 ~~I~(~~~) iiRPm,Rnr I lTTir q''ifTIrn'....1iITri. aJlTIT;{f
3 VPT q''ifImf~ !Ilt:ff ;ft.~.IIi. 1979 it ~ ;r(f f1t;Q; t(l:t I Qil
4 ~'r22 CHAPTER-IV FINANCE OF LOCAL BODIES
4.1 Statement III contains data regarding finance be incorporated in this statement as the same are of lucal bodies for the year 1978-79. Financial data not available hence the analysis is limited to 285 of the local bodies in respect of 42 towns could nut towns.
LIST OF TOWNS FOR WHICH THE DATA OF LOCAL BODY FINANCE COULD NOT BE AVAILABLD .------_------Size clas S Qf SI. NQ. in the Name of To.wn Reason towns respective class ....-----.------...... ------2 3 4 ------.------.. ------~------.-.------.. - I 1 Bhllainagar A project township with no urban bod}. II R"1.jhlra Jhara.lda.lli A praje::t township with nl) urban body.
III 1 Cha.roda A prJljeci township with n'l urban body. 2 Khamuia Administration oftownship is under Central Govunment (Minis- try ~r Defence). 3 Kurasia Gram Panchay:it-Data not received. 4 M~hasamulld DMa not received from thc municipal committee. IV 1 Ahiwara D3ta not received. 2 Bhila Kalan SADA-No urban body functioning. 3 ChikhaliKalan G.P.-Data not received. 4 Jamul S\.DA-N.:. civic body functioning. 5 Kirandul A project township with no urban boc y 6 Kym~re CT-No civi;: body functioning. 7 Pali N -\.C-,stablished in June, 1979 8 Pasan N'\C-established in June, 1979 9 Prithvipur GP. in 1978-79 Record depOsited with D.P.W O. hence data not supplied. 10 Tirodi G.P.-D:lta not received v 1 Anuppur NAC-establhhtd in June, 1979 2 Badkuhi G.P. Data not received 3 B3.n~agar G.P. Project t'llwnship Data not available. 4 Bhamodi G.P. Data not received. 5 Bhilakhedi CT- No civic body functiOning 6 Bijuri NAC-estabIished in March, 1979 7 Butaria G.P.Data not available 8 Chandamc:ta OP-Da.ta n'ltavallable. 9 Daboh NA~stablishcd in 1979 :0 !)ig!llwa:::li OP-Da.ta. llotavailable. 11 Hanumana NAC-establ.Ghcd in May 1979 12 Iklehra GP- Da.ta not rtceived. 13 Jaitwara NAC established In 1979 14 Khaniyadhana NAC-The rocorc was found in PQlice custody at tho time of p~rsonal visit. 15 KumhlIi SADA-No civic body functioning. 16 Mangawan NAC-established i111979. 17 Naigarhl NAC-established 111 1979. 18 New Ka tni Rly. In. Area CT-No civic bady functioning. 19 Ordnance Fa.ctory area, Katni CI'-No civic body functioning.
22 23
1 2 3 4 2 3 4 ------20 mm: ~~""I'~~ 23 ~ ;j't.~.lti. 1979 it ~ SI'I'------~------
wmn 14 ~ ~ 11ft srfir .nita snfl:R 1{1i _
-----,-----
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ ~fil1l1l' 6 63.25 20.04 43.21 59.49 6 51 29.73 9.12 1. 70 12.45 ~~ 7 48.47 27.54 20.93 46.63 5.07 29.24 4.73 3.63 12.96 l:[ltr 13 63.24 22.99 40.25 59.73 6.52 29.10 8.57 2.26 13.28 Ci1i" lIlif 26 51.{;8 23.79 27.79 51. 17 8.54 13.53 12.56 2.34 14.20 ~q'f~ 23 49.81 23.38 26.43 48.07 9.08 13.26 9.68 1. 77 14.28 ~it l 2 59.01 32.43 26.58 {)0.05 2.14 24 06 8.57 10.23 , 15.05 «In 72.91 17.44 55.47 95.29 8.85 I. 37 73.78 Ill. 30 IPf .... 1(q I f(ijifil 38 43.88 23.65 20.33' 43.97 8.88 13.07 7.91 1. 48 113.03 ;:r~ 3 3.27 2.27 2.55 3.74 1. 01 0.58 1. 81 0.06 0.28 «l' orr 1 81.97 56.89 25.08 92.33 2.74 25.44 14.70 9 33 40.12 ;;it 'fr 1 0.76 0.30 0.46 1. 78 0.14 0.03 1. 36 0.01 0.23 ~it 1 20.21 12.09 8.12 163.54 62.39 43.89 5.35 28.19 23.86 l:[N 44 41. 00 22.36 18.64 43.50 8.91 12.78 7.14 1. 89 12.72 ~ ~~ 88 40.27 24.06 16.21 38.47 8.41 11.69 6.13 0.98 II. 26 ;:rT.~.lti. 17 20.20 10.10 10.09 18.50 4.34 4.96 3.68 0.03 5.48 ~oiT 1 41. 25 1. 12 42.13 41. 97 13.16 24.43 4.06 0.03 1. 29 ;;iTtft 3 5.52 2.83 2.69 5.59 1. 67 1. 42 0.93 1. 58 lI'\1r 109 36.64 21. 36 15.28 34.93 7.73 10.64 5.73 0.82 10.11 ~ ~~ 33 41.01 22.54 18.47 39.70 10.35 6.47 6.45 0.30 16.13 ill .~.'Ii. 36 15.07 7.• 68 7.39 15.63 3.86 1.~~_. 3.26 0.35 6.27 «l'ir 1 140.10 20.17. l19,93 -i.4D.I0 7.25 5.19; .. ,47.36 7.,13 73.17 iIIli ;;it tft 18 !L 07 4:"9'9 4.0S /8.60 2.00 1. 44 , 1. 76 0;55 2.85 .. li'itf, " 88 '25~ 77 _. -13.14 U.63, '25.44 6.09 . j.63 4.87 0.46 10.39 'Pi ifT.I1;.'li • 1 48.84 30.54 12.30 42.10 14.70 12.89 14.51 ;;iTtft - 1 2.06 0.09 1.97 2.29 0.09 0.26 1. 94 ~l .z 131.7S 11.4.9 18.2-4 180.G8 26.04 6.4P 81. 88 1.52 65.05 lfFr 4 99.91 40.87 59.04 90.84 15.27, 2.B8 39.19 0.66 32.84 _.,'1....
------_._-_._------':"'"._----_---_._---_ .. _ .. _._------~------._-.------2 3 4 -----_._--._------.. ------20 Pichhore The record was reported to be in police custody at the time of p~rsQnal visit.
21 R~mpar-Baghelal\ NAC-established in 1979 22 Ranipura Cf-No civic body fUllctioning. 23 S~m!ria. NAC-estabHshed in 1979 24 Sirgiti GP-Data nQlt received. 25 Sirmour NAC-established in 1979. VI 1 Jatachhapar Gl'-Data not received. ------,-~-----.------~--~~------4.1 P·~r ;lpit'l re;~ipt; and expen1iture of the l'l~al bo:ties by siZ!J chus of t')wn is!I;s indicated in the fGllClwing table .-
TA'BLE--14
Per Capita Receipt amI expenditure by Size-Class 0/ Towns ---_-----_-_-._..• _------.------.. _------Size Civic N(). PER CAPITA Class Status of ------.------.. --._------_.__ -- OIftOlwns towns RECEIPTS (Rs. ,00 ) EXPENDITUFE (Rs. ,00) ----- .. ---.. -----.. ------... _---.. _---.. _---- Total Receipts Rf.lccipt Total General Expenditure Public Expendi- Fxpen- receipts through from eC'tpendi- A4. 3 f.tim I:(lIi f.rlrfur ~for; fit; ..,y III u:t ..,y V ~ if11<.1..n- ~ wq" SR~ ~ 'Ii ijlf~ if ~Wrerrrt mM ~ f.rlr.r:IT crrr !rfcr Clffiffl oll"lf ~lf fTlJ ~ fu GI:If.Rr mlf ~ ~4a ~ I ~ 'f'f V ~ "fro if" ~ ~a" ;cr VI 16. 81 3. 16 43.14 0.73 36.14 f.:n:;:r .)uft i if1n:f 'tT ~ lI"QIlf q1f ~ if1n:f 'fi"T W:lfu If':t 9;lq!I!T mll"; W{iJ ~ 1IR ~ it"f it ...aRt f.n:;r T mJl"r.!f SfWT"A' t1;ci ~ lI";::T it 'R ~ ~ tm flmr~ q'1ff ~ ~1'f11: if1n:f if mtr ~ ~ C1fli t('i 9;lTlf ~ . 'fi"lI"' pr o!Tl:I' . f""'i111f11~ ~: . . . . . ;;r;r ~ (AT W~T 'l<: f.!;it Clf!f T 'I;j"~ ~lf"I'I'lf mat t I ' O!R" ~ 'I;f~'mI' if ~ if; ~ it ~T a"~ mqr;:q- Sf!!ITIiR I + 3. 51 .rr.r. mt t tt'I' ~ilIT ~ ~ I .!!flr if; ~ff. it ~)ofr 'l;j"it ~ I Cff1filll'ftr ~ ffi'JT~ ~mft ~ Ft> 4. 5 srfu oqf.;q 0!(tI' ~ ft ~ ~ur ~'!.ar1 IIi')' ~ffi' 4.3 It would he hazardou,; to make any conclusive 1 3 4 :: (, stntem"'t about thl' tinancial condition of lhe Jo~a? bodies of Ille 1\.1\>11:; on tht: hu:;is of tigur;::; relating to a <;JJ1gl..: year. Wlmlever comments are g.iven here III 20.47 29.32 \6.41 4.53 29.25 may therefore be reviewed keeping this ]imitation in IV 22.12 :9.88 16.32 2.3(i 29.30 mind. It would be seen from above table that c:xcept 23.93 14.2.8 19.10 1.81 40.87 16}::J 3.16 4J.IJ 0.73 36.14 in da~s III and da"s V towns, the !ot.ll per capi:a ""J expenditure is within total per capita receipt of local All body in each size class of town. However, in case of Cla~ses 15.13 38.32 17.ln 3.75 25.69 class V Town the margin is too fine. In size class III per capita expendituf\! is higher than the receipt and thus shows the rather precarious financial position in 4.6 It may be observed from the table that in size which the local bodies of this size c\a<;s, ar'~ placed class 1 towns there is relati.vely less proportion of in. It is the size class I consisting of 6 corpoartions expenditure on general administration and expendi and 7 numicipalities and the size class VI consisting ture on miscellaneous or other items and roughly half of 1 .NAC;, 2 SADA and 1 Gram Panchayat are most the expenditure on public health and convenience. hUp'ptly situated. Tn ether words the uppermost and When we go to the towns of size class II we find that the lowermost size olass, are much more favourable the proportion of expenditure on public health is and happily situated than th'! mid:1!e size class. and reduced and there is increase under other heads. Go- between thcm it is the lowermost siZe class which is . ing further 10 size· class III th·z proportion on general most happily situated sharing the surplus of 9.10. administration and miscellaneous convenience increa Excess of receipt over expenditure in the different scs sti'l further. 1n size class lV whereas expenditure size class of towns is as shown below on public health show It smaH increase in propor -- ._-- _... tion the proportionate. expenditur.e on general ad Sllec! .. ss ()ftown~ Excess of receipt ministration giles up wher.:as that on public institu o\'er tions get reduced. e,pend iture Class f + 3.76 Clas~ rr -!- 0.41 In size class V the proportion goes still higher and Class III - 2.30 so does the expenditure on all other sources (Miscel Class IV _1- 1.71 Class V 2- 0.33 laneous). Tn fact the trend of expenditure from class Class vr -!- 9.10 size I to class size V shows that the proportion of expenditure on general administration and that of 4.5 The analysis of the per capita expenditure show interesting features. In the table below fhe propor public institutions are, broadly speaking, inversely tionate per capita expenditure under dilfcrcll t heads proportional. That is to say as we go down in size has been indicated. class the proportion of expenditure On general ad PROPORTIONATE PER CAPITA EXPENDITURE ministration and other miscellaneous heads increases UNDER DIFFERENT HEADS BY SrZE-CLASS OF and that on public institutions registers regular dec TOWNS rease. The statement also shows the proportionate 2 3 4 5 6 expenditure on public works is the least in size class _. I and highcst in size class VI. This can be easily under Sizc (JcOI.:ral Public Public Public Others class adminis- health works institu- stood. because it is only . the less developed and of tration ilnd tiClns growing towns that spend more on public works than t(1wns cllnven- t'he already developed class J town:s. The above is ience -- __ a very short and cursory avalysis of the figures. • J 10.90 48.69 14.35 3.80 22.2 Again it needs to be remembered that the figures are II 16.90 26.61 24.70 4.41 27.3 --_-_.-_ - .. _.- only for one year i.e. 1978-79.
1 RGJl86-9 5. 1 ~.-f.p:;:r ~ ;rrofr ~ f.fmr rnr ~ ;tT~ 1971 it ~ ~ ~ lr ~ t I : \lrmfur ~ I 19 i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ rn IV, V .u,;f VI ir. ~ \If.r "Il9" 'fiT< 1fflj 'fi"T ~ ..n- ~ 1"'1<1 ~ ~ ~'fi" ~ if -ft .~ m qil~~ ~ ~ 'f'j 'f:t ~ oqit ~ I ~ if .;prff ~T .~ .~ if~ ~ ~ ,!f4 qA m if ~~lS
.. ;ni_, ~ R t ~ ~l ..., ,,~
.. _- _.. _... - .. _--_ ..... __ .. "'_-- ---.... _. __ ... - .... __ .. _-_. -_. __ ..... _.- ._ .. _-_ .•. _...... _', - _ ...... _..... _.. _--- -.. - ._--_._-,---_.. _._ ... _ •... -.------3ffu1:fofi~~.1ff. if) (f.f.".lii. if)
. 2 345 6 7 ------_.... _----_._ .. _-----_ .. _----_ .... ------, .1 169.91 36.54 206.45 0.47 0.01 0.57 II 133.04 51. 70 184.74 0.42 0.16 0.58 III 141.28 89.21 230.49 0.42 0.27 0.89 IV 60.24 53.39 113.63 0.46 0.41 0.87 V 30.79 31.58 70.37 0.50 0.41 0.91 VI 63. 13 14.10 77.23 2.48 0.56 3.04 "_'___ .' • ___ ._. ______, •• _. ______--. __ •••• _ •• _._•• _ ••• _ •• __• _____ ._ • __ •• ____n ___ • _ ••••• ___ ._. ___._._ •• __ • ______• _____• ______.. rim 100.74 48.31 141.05 '._ ..... __ .___ ... _.. _.. _... __ .... _._...... _. __ .. ______. __ .. _____ ..... __. __ ._.0.46 __ ._ ..... _. ___ .. 0.21____ ._. ____0.67 .. .1-,
5.4 ~~ij;~~;;m:im q<: ~ "I'Tift ~ I _._----_-_. __ .. __ ._-_._--- -~-- -~._.-- -~.
5. 5 ~m'{ ffi;r i!1TU if ~ ~ Q1IT IR~ .!fit . --.-_ .. '--'-""'--"------_._--_.--._ snta ~1 rn t I mI': m ~~ ~ ;tT vrofr 15 it I ~ ~"I~pmtl IV 2 ~
11 3 ~