DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 9/Thursday, January 14, 2021/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 9/Thursday, January 14, 2021/Notices Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Notices 3181 and in site-specific analyses. To address mitigation. After reviewing the of changes to the management or public comments raised during the comments that the BLM received about modification to the boundaries of 129 supplemental EIS process, the BLM compensatory mitigation, the BLM Areas of Critical Environmental Concern convened a team of biologists and land determined that its environmental (ACECs). By this notice, the BLM is use planners to evaluate scientific analysis supporting the 2019 land use announcing the availability of the Draft literature provided to the agency. The plan amendments was sound. The LUPA/EIS. In order to comply with BLM found that the most up-to-date public has now had substantial Federal regulations, the BLM is also Greater Sage-Grouse science and other opportunities to consider and comment announcing a comment period on information has incrementally on the BLM’s approach to compensatory proposed changes to the ACECs within increased, and built upon, the mitigation at the land use planning the planning area. knowledgebase of Greater Sage-Grouse level, including the approach taken in DATES: To ensure that comments will be management evaluated by the BLM most the 2019 land use plan amendments. considered, the BLM must receive recently in its 2019 land use plan Based on the final supplemental EIS, written comments on the Draft LUPA/ amendments, but does not change the the BLM has determined that its decade- EIS within 90 days following the date scope or direction of the BLM’s long planning and NEPA processes have the Environmental Protection Agency management; however, new science sufficiently addressed Greater Sage- publishes its notice of the Draft LUPA/ does suggest adaptations to management Grouse habitat conservation and no new EIS in the Federal Register. The BLM may be warranted at site-specific scales. land use planning process to consider will announce future meetings and any (3) Cumulative Effects Analysis: The additional alternatives or new other public participation activities at BLM considered cumulative impacts on information is warranted. This least 15 days in advance through public a rangewide basis, organizing that determination is not a new planning notices, news releases, and/or mailings. analysis at the geographic scale of each decision. Instead, it is a determination ADDRESSES: The Desert Plan Western Association of Fish and not to amend the applicable land use Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA) Amendment Draft LUPA/EIS are plans. Thus, it is not subject to appeal available on the BLM ePlanning project management zone, in order to consider or protest. The BLM’s decision remains impacts at biologically meaningful website at https://go.usa.gov/x7hdj. as identified in the 2019 Approved Click the ‘‘Documents’’ link on the left scales. In the 2019 planning process, the Resource Management Plan Amendment BLM incorporated by reference side of the screen to find the electronic for Greater Sage-Grouse conservation in version of these materials. Hard copies cumulative effects analysis conducted Idaho. in the 2015 planning process and other of the Desert Plan Amendment Draft environmental impact statements. Since (Authority: 40 CFR 1505.2; 40 CFR 1506.6; LUPA and Draft EIS are also available References to the CEQ regulations are to the the nature and context of the cumulative for public inspection at the following regulations in effect prior to September 14, BLM locations: effects scenario has not appreciably 2020. The revised CEQ regulations effective changed since 2015, and the 2015 September 14, 2020, are not cited because California State Office, 2800 Cottage analysis covered the entire range of the this supplemental EIS process began prior to Way, Suite W–1623, Sacramento, CA Greater Sage-Grouse, the BLM’s that date.) 95825; California Desert District Office, 22835 consideration of cumulative effects in John F. Ruhs, the 2015 planning process adequately Calle San Juan De Los Lagos, Moreno BLM Idaho State Director. addresses most, if not all, of the Valley, CA 92553; planning decisions made through the [FR Doc. 2021–00662 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am] Barstow Field Office, 2601 Barstow 2019 planning process. BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P Road, Barstow, CA 92311; While the 2019 planning process El Centro Field Office, 1661 S. 4th largely incorporated by reference the Street, El Centro, CA 92243; analysis from the 2015 planning DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Needles Field Office, 1303 S. Highway 95, Needles, CA 92363; process, and updated it where needed to Bureau of Land Management account for current conditions, the 2020 Ridgecrest Field Office, 300 S. supplemental EIS process elaborated on [(LLCA930000.L13400000.DS0000.21X) Richmond Road, Ridgecrest, CA this information in greater detail and MO#450014117] 93555; updated the analysis to ensure that the Bakersfield Field Office, 3801 Pegasus Notice of Availability of the Draft BLM appropriately evaluated Drive, Bakersfield, CA 93308; and Desert Plan Amendment and Draft cumulative effects at biologically Bishop Field Office, 351 Pacu Lane, Environmental Impact Statement, meaningful scales. Suite 100, Bishop, CA 93514. (4) BLM’s Approach to Compensatory California You may submit written comments Mitigation: In the 2019 planning AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, related to the Desert Plan Amendment process, the BLM requested public Interior. by either of the following methods: • Website: https://go.usa.gov/x7hdj. comments on a number of issues, ACTION: Notice of availability. including the BLM’s approach to • Mail: Bureau of Land Management, compensatory mitigation. As part of the SUMMARY: In accordance with the California State Office, Attn: Desert Plan 2015 Approved Resource Management National Environmental Policy Act of Amendment, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite Plan Amendments, the BLM selected a 1969, as amended, the Bureau of Land W–1623, Sacramento, CA 95825. net conservation gain standard in its Management (BLM) has prepared a Draft FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: approach to compensatory mitigation, Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA) and Jeremiah Karuzas, Renewable Energy which the 2019 land use plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement Program Manager, telephone: 916–978– amendments modified to align with the (EIS), for an amendment to the 4644, email: [email protected]; address BLM’s 2018 policy on compensatory California Desert Conservation Area Bureau of Land Management, 2800 mitigation. Through the 2020 (CDCA) Plan and the Bakersfield and Cottage Way, W–1623, Sacramento, CA supplemental EIS process, the BLM Bishop Resource Management Plans 95825. Persons who use a requested further comments about the (RMPs). The Desert Plan Amendment telecommunications device for the deaf BLM’s approach to compensatory Draft LUPA/EIS includes consideration (TDD) may call the Federal Relay VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:43 Jan 13, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JAN1.SGM 14JAN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 3182 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Notices Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339 to recreational and off-highway vehicle the areas identified as CDNCL by contact Mr. Karuzas during normal access, mining access, and grazing; and approximately 2.2 million acres; and business hours. The FRS is available 24 • The impact that land-use result in an additional 450,000 acres of hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a designations, land-disturbance limits General Public Lands (GPL). Alternative message or question. You will receive a (‘‘disturbance caps’’), and visual- 1 would also modify or eliminate 68 reply during normal business hours. management classifications contained in Conservation Management Actions the plans may have on the deployment (CMAs), which would also change the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In of future communications manner in which disturbance caps are September 2016, the BLM issued a infrastructure. implemented, including elimination of Record of Decision (ROD) for the Desert The BLM used public scoping disturbance caps in CDNCL, as well as Renewable Energy Conservation Plan comments to help identify planning allowing renewable energy development (DRECP) LUPA, which amended the issues to formulate alternatives and in Special Recreation Management CDCA Plan, the Bishop RMP, and the frame the scope of analysis in the Draft Areas (SRMA). Bakersfield RMP in the Mojave and LUPA/EIS. Issues considered in the Alternative 2 would reduce the Colorado/Sonoran Desert regions of Draft LUPA/EIS are management actions number of ACECs to 100, and reduce the southern California. The 2016 ROD was associated with conservation areas, acreage of the ACECs by approximately intended to address the streamlining of biological resources (including special 1.5 million acres; reduce the areas renewable energy development, status species), cultural resources, identified as CDNCL by approximately conservation of desert resources, and to renewable energy, minerals, livestock 2.1 million acres; and result in an support multiple use and recreation on grazing, visual resources, air resources, additional approximate 274,000 acres of the nearly 11 million acres of BLM- water resources, and recreation. The General Public Lands (GPL). Alternative managed public land in the planning LUPA also considers decisions 2 would also modify or eliminate the area. In response to challenges that regarding ACECs, California Desert same 68 CMAs, which would also arose with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Elmer C. Aldrich
    PLANNING MILESTONES FOR THE PARK UNITS AND MAJOR PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS SYSTEM July 1, 2010 Planning Division California State Parks P. O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 PLANNING MILESTONES FOR THE PARK UNITS AND MAJOR PROPERTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARK SYSTEM July 1, 2010 OVERVIEW This document is a compendium providing selected information on the classified units and major unclassified properties which currently are or have in the past been associated with the California State Park System. The main purposes of this compendium are to provide, in a single source: 1. a record of the major milestones and achievements in unit-level land use and management planning which have been accomplished through the years by the Department, with the major accomplishments of the last year summarized in Chapter II; 2. a variety of other information useful to understanding the past history or current status of these units and properties, and of the evolution of unit-level land use and resource management planning in the Department; and 3. The definitive number and the specific identity of those basic classified units and major unclassified properties which constitute the official State Park System as of the date of this report’s publication. As of July 1, 2010, the California State Park System consists of 278 basic classified units and major unclassified properties. These are identified on Lists 1 and 2 in Chapter III. To have data current to July 1, 2010, this total will be the Department’s official figure until the next edition of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • MDRS Final Summary Report – Crew 78 Vincent Beaudry, Kathryn Denning, Judah Epstein, Dirk Geeroms, Balwant Rai, Grier Wilt
    MDRS final summary report – Crew 78 Vincent Beaudry, Kathryn Denning, Judah Epstein, Dirk Geeroms, Balwant Rai, Grier Wilt Introduction If interplanetary colonization is to be possible, humanity needs to learn as much as possible about how to rise to the challenges involved. One way to achieve this is, of course, through simulations. Our crew, the 78th in the Mars Desert Research Station simulation, was intensively international, composed of 2 Canadians (Kathryn Denning, Vincent Beaudry), 2 Americans (Judah Epstein, Grier Wilt), one Belgian (Dirk Geeroms) and one Indian (Balwant Rai). None of us had met before, and joining together to overcome language barriers and explore cultural differences provided us with an intense intercultural experience, surely akin to those which will be a part of future space exploration. As a group, we: developed our own knowledge of the challenges of space exploration; contributed to some ongoing MDRS research into extremophiles, environmental impact, and plant growth; furthered our individual projects in human physiology, long-distance teaching, and anthropology; acted as subjects for outside human factors researchers; and worked together to make life at the Hab go smoothly, including making some improvements to the Hab and to the EVA equipment. The Group Our crew was comprised of 6 individuals, with the following specialties: Vincent Beaudry was the commander, Judah Epstein the engineer and executive officer, Balwant Rai the scientist and health and security officer, Grier Wilt our biologist, Dirk Geeroms the teacher and astronomer, and Kathryn Denning our anthropologist and journalist. Although we all had our respective roles within this two weeks journey, we all enjoyed very much taking part in each others experiences and in the everyday tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Geodynamics and Global-Scale Hydrology on Mars
    R EPORTS ␪ 15. ccs represents the CO2 concentration at the chloro- component and calculate eq from a weighting of plast surface, which is the limit of CA activity and is 75:25 C4 grasses:trees to allow for the presence of thus assumed to represent the site of CO2-H2Oin trees in savanna-type habitats. Group 9 (C3 grassland leaves. ccs is typically a midway value between those and agriculture) we assume comprises 25:50:25 for in the liquid-air interfaces and the sites of CO2 trees:C3 grasses:C4 grasses; the C3 and C4 grasses assimilation inside leaves (14). include some C3 herbs and C4 grass species as crops. 16. Supplementary data are available on Science Online 31. G. Hoffmann et al., in preparation. at www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/291/5513/ 32. J. R. Ehleringer, T. E. Cerling, B. R. Helliker, Oecologia 2584/DC1. 112, 285 (1997). 17. M. D. Hatch, J. N. Burnell, Plant Physiol. 93, 825 33. G. J. Collatz, J. A. Berry, J. S. Clark, Oecologia 114, 441 (1990). (1998). 18. E. Utsoniyama, S. Muto, Physiol. Plant. 88, 413 34. J. Lloyd, G. D. Farquhar, Oecologia 99, 201 (1994). (1993). 35. M. Trolier, J. W. C. White, J. R. Lawrence, W. S. 19. A. Makino et al., Plant Physiol. 100, 1737 (1992) Broecker, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 25897 (1996). 20. G. A. Mills, H. C. Urey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 62, 1019 36. R. A. Houghton, Tellus 51B, 298 (1999). (1940). 37. R. H. Waring, W. H. Schlesinger, Forest Ecosystems 21. J. S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Hydrologic Region Colorado River California’s Groundwater Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Chemehuevi Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-43 • County: San Bernardino • Surface Area: 273,000 acres (427 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This basin underlies Chemehuevi Valley in eastern San Bernardino County. The basin is bounded by Havasu Lake on the east and by nonwater-bearing rocks of the Sacramento Mountains on the north, of the Chemehuevi Mountains on the northeast, of the Whipple Mountains on the southeast, of the Turtle Mountains on the west and south (Bishop 1963). The valley is drained by Chemehuevi Wash to Havasu Lake. Annual average precipitation ranges from about 4 to 6 inches. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Groundwater in the basin is found in alluvium and the Bouse Formation. Alluvium. Holocene age younger alluvium, which is found in washes and the floodplain of the Colorado River, is composed of sand, silt and gravel (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). Older alluvium consists of unconsolidated, fine- to coarse-grained sand, pebbles, and boulders with variable amounts of silt and clay. Bouse Formation. The Pliocene age Bouse Formation is composed of a basal limestone bed overlain by interbedded clay, silt, and sand. Thickness of the formation reaches 254 feet (Metzger and Loeltz 1973). The formation is underlain by locally derived fanglomerate and overlain by alluviums of the Colorado River and its tributaries. Restrictive Structures An unnamed fault crosses a portion of the southern side of the basin (Bishop 1963), but it is not known whether or not this fault impedes groundwater flow in the basin.
    [Show full text]
  • O Lunar and Planetary Institute Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System RADAR ALTIMETRY of the LARGE ?.LARTIAN CRATERS
    RADAR ALTIMETRY OF THE LARGE MARTIAN CRATERS, L. E. Roth, G. S. Downs, and R. S. Saunders, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91103; G. Schubert, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024. The Goldstone Mars data (1,2) have been used to obtain detailed morpho- metric information on martian craters. Some qualitative results of this effort have been reported previously (3). Radar profiles of a total of 131 impact craters have been recognized. (The following symbols are used in the subsequent discussion: Ri (km) is crater depth and Dr (km) is rim-crest diameter (4)). The craters range in size from Dr " 20 km to Dr " 500 km, and are all located within a subequatorial belt of the cratered highlands, bounded by approximate latitudes of -14' and -21'. This belt constitutes about 8% of the total surface area of the planet. The current data coverage does not exceed approximately 25% of the area of the belt, i.e., about 2% of the area of the planet. Radar profiles of large craters with the visually flat floors show sub- dued crater rims (rarely higher than 300-400 meters), usually shallow interior walls, and little structural detail in the interior and the exterior walls. In contrast, the floors of the same craters often display topographic relief greater than the error in the range measurement. The largest craters (Dr > 125 km) show differing degrees of the floor level adjustment. The two extreme cases are the craters Bakhuysen (Dr = 140 km, (-23.0°, 344.0')) whose floor is almost 2500 m below the surrounding terrain, in sharp contrast with Denning (Dr = 140 km, (-17.8O, 326.5O)) whose floor is almost at the same level as the surrounding terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Emily Bradshaw Marino 2017
    Copyright by Emily Bradshaw Marino 2017 The Thesis Committee for Emily Bradshaw Marino Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Isolating Lithologic Controls on Landscape Morphology in the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico and Texas APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Joel Johnson Paola Passalacqua David Mohrig Isolating Lithologic Controls on Landscape Morphology in the Guadalupe Mountains, New Mexico and Texas by Emily Bradshaw Marino, B.S. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin May 2017 Dedication To my loving parents, Thomas and Lucy Bradshaw, who have always supported me and encouraged me to follow my dreams. Acknowledgements First, I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to my advisor, Joel Johnson, for his guidance, support, and patience throughout my time at the Jackson School. I would also like to thank my committee members, David Mohrig and Paola Passalacqua for their assistance with writing this thesis. I am grateful for the opportunities I have been given during my time at the University of Texas and I value the efforts of all the faculty and staff I have had the pleasure of working with. I am beholden to the Jackson School of Geosciences for providing support for my studies and fostering an environment of world class research and scientific study. Though my time in the field was short, I am very appreciative of the funding I received to help with my field studies and would like to thank the Jackson School and the Surface and Hydrologic Processes committee for the seed grant award.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the 27Th Annual Wildflower Hotline, Brought to You by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a Non-Profit Plant Nursery, Seed
    Welcome back to the 28th Annual Wildflower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store and education center, dedicated to the preservation of wildflowers and California native plants. The glory of spring has really kicked into high gear as many deserts, canyons, parks, and natural areas are ablaze of color – so get out there and enjoy the beauty of California wildflowers. This week we begin at the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in Palm Desert, where the Randall Henderson and Art Smith Trails are ablaze with beavertail cactus (Opuntia basilaris), Arizona lupine (Lupinus arizonicus), little gold poppy (Eschscholzia minutiflora), chuparosa (Justicia californica), brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), desert lavender (Hyptis emoryi), wild heliotrope (Phacelia distans), and apricot mallow (Sphaeralcea ambigua). If you are heading to Palm Springs for the weekend, take a trip along Palm Canyon Dr. where the roadside is radiant with sand verbena (Abronia villosa), Fremont pincushion (Chaenactis fremontii), desert dandelion (Malacothrix glabrata), forget-me-not (Cryptantha sp.), Spanish needle (Palafoxia arida), Arizona Lupine (Lupinus arizonicus), and creosote bush (Larrea tridentata). While in the area check out Tahquitz Canyon, in the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, off West Mesquite Ave., which is still decorated with desert dandelion (Malacothrix glabrata), pymy golden poppy (Eschscholzia minutiflora), white fiesta flower (Pholistoma membranaceum), California sun cup (Camissonia californica), brown-eyed primrose (Camissonia claviformis), and more. NOTE: This is a 2-mile loop trail that requires some scrambling over rocks. Just north of I-10, off Varner Road, Edom Hill is a carpet of color with Arizona lupine (Lupinus arizonicus), sand verbena (Abronia villosa), Fremont pincushion (Chaenactis fremontii), and croton (Croton californicus), along with a sprinkling of desert sunflower (Geraea canescens) and dyebush (Psorothamnus emoryi).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Building Descriptions and Climate Zones
    Appendix D Building Descriptions and Climate Zones APPENDIX D: Building Descriptions The purpose of the Building Descriptions is to assist the user in selecting an appropriate type of building when using the Air Conditioning estimating tools. The selected building type should be the one that most closely matches the actual project. These summaries provide the user with the inputs for the typical buildings. Minor variations from these inputs will occur based on differences in building vintage and climate zone. The Building Descriptions are referenced from the 2004-2005 Database for Energy Efficiency Resources (DEER) Update Study. It should be noted that the user is required to provide certain inputs for the user’s specific building (e.g. actual conditioned area, city, operating hours, economy cycle, new AC system and new AC system efficiency). The remaining inputs are approximations of the building and are deemed acceptable to the user. If none of the typical building models are determined to be a fair approximation then the user has the option to use the Custom Building approach. The Custom Building option instructs the user how to initiate the Engage Software. The Engage Software is a stand-alone, DOE2 based modeling program. July 16, 2013 D-1 Version 5.0 Prototype Source Activity Area Type Area % Area Simulation Model Notes 1. Assembly DEER Auditorium 33,235 97.8 Thermal Zoning: One zone per activity area. Office 765 2.2 Total 34,000 Model Configuration: Matches 1994 DEER prototype HVAC Systems: The prototype uses Rooftop DX systems, which are changed to Rooftop HP systems for the heat pump efficiency measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Society of Southern California Collection -- Charles Puck Collection of Negatives and Photographs: Finding Aid
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf2p30028s No online items Historical Society of Southern California Collection -- Charles Puck Collection of Negatives and Photographs: Finding Aid Finding aid prepared by Jennifer Watts. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Photo Archives 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © August 1999 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Historical Society of Southern photCL 400 volume 2 & volume 3 1 California Collection -- Charles Puck Collection of Negatives a... Overview of the Collection Title: Historical Society of Southern California Collection -- Charles Puck Collection of Negatives and Photographs Dates (inclusive): 1864-1963 Bulk dates: 1920s-1950s Collection Number: photCL 400 volume 2 & volume 3 Creator: Puck, Charles, 1882-1968 Extent: 11,400 photographs in 42 boxes (30.29 linear feet) Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Photo Archives 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: The Puck Collection consists of more than 11,000 photographs and negatives both taken and collected by Los Angeles resident and local history enthusiast Charles Puck (1882-1968), which he donated to the Historical Society of Southern California over more than twenty years in the mid-20th century. The photographs date from 1864 to 1963 (bulk 1920s-1950s) and depict buildings, monuments, civic happenings, modes of transportation, flora and fauna, and anything else that captured his particular interests. Puck compiled several scrapbooks on topics such as adobes and buildings of Los Angeles, illustrating them with his photographs and annotating them with historical anecdotes and personal recollections.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Lunar and Martian Nomenclature
    APPENDIX I LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE LUNAR AND MARTIAN NOMENCLATURE A large number of names of craters and other features on the Moon and Mars, were accepted by the IAU General Assemblies X (Moscow, 1958), XI (Berkeley, 1961), XII (Hamburg, 1964), XIV (Brighton, 1970), and XV (Sydney, 1973). The names were suggested by the appropriate IAU Commissions (16 and 17). In particular the Lunar names accepted at the XIVth and XVth General Assemblies were recommended by the 'Working Group on Lunar Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr D. H. Menzel. The Martian names were suggested by the 'Working Group on Martian Nomenclature' under the Chairmanship of Dr G. de Vaucouleurs. At the XVth General Assembly a new 'Working Group on Planetary System Nomenclature' was formed (Chairman: Dr P. M. Millman) comprising various Task Groups, one for each particular subject. For further references see: [AU Trans. X, 259-263, 1960; XIB, 236-238, 1962; Xlffi, 203-204, 1966; xnffi, 99-105, 1968; XIVB, 63, 129, 139, 1971; Space Sci. Rev. 12, 136-186, 1971. Because at the recent General Assemblies some small changes, or corrections, were made, the complete list of Lunar and Martian Topographic Features is published here. Table 1 Lunar Craters Abbe 58S,174E Balboa 19N,83W Abbot 6N,55E Baldet 54S, 151W Abel 34S,85E Balmer 20S,70E Abul Wafa 2N,ll7E Banachiewicz 5N,80E Adams 32S,69E Banting 26N,16E Aitken 17S,173E Barbier 248, 158E AI-Biruni 18N,93E Barnard 30S,86E Alden 24S, lllE Barringer 29S,151W Aldrin I.4N,22.1E Bartels 24N,90W Alekhin 68S,131W Becquerei
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Distribution of the Elf Owl in California
    STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ELF OWL IN CALIFORNIA MARY D. HALTERMAN, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Chico, California95929 STEPHEN A. LAYMON, Departmentof Forestryand ResourceManagement, 145 Mulford Hall, Universityof California, Berkeley, California94720 MARY J. WHITFIELD, Department of BiologicalSciences, California State University,Chico, California95929 In California,the Elf Owl (Micrathenewhitneyi) has been found only in riparianhabitats and scatteredstands of Saguaro(Carnegiea gigantea) along the lower Colorado River and at a few desert oases (Grinnell and Miller 1944). Although the specieshas never been numerousin California, there hasapparently been a populationdecline. Surveys in 1978 and 1979 located 11 and 6 pairsof Elf Owls, respectively,at two locationsalong the lower Col- orado River (Cardiff1978, 1979). Cardiff's(1978) completerecord of the 28 Elf Owl sightingsmade in California prior to 1978 identified eight locations where the specieshas been found. We gathered10 additionalrecords made since 1979 (Table 1). All recent records were for either Soto Ranch or near Water Wheel Camp. Since 1979, habitatdestruction has continued, resulting in the loss of much of the remainingcottonwood-willow and mesquite bosques(C. Hunter and B. Andersonpers. comm.). This lossis due to the proliferationof tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis),agricultural clearing, bank stabilizationprojects, urbanization, and recentsustained flooding (Laymon and Halterman1987). This lossand itspotential effect on Elf Owlsprompted thissurvey
    [Show full text]