Understanding Goods Movement in Canada: Trends and Best Practices
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Northern Assets: Transportation Infrastructure in Remote Communities
Report December 2011 Northern Assets: Transportation Infrastructure in Remote Communities ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION POLICY Northern Assets: Transportation Infrastructure in Remote Communities by Marta Bristow and Vijay Gill About The Conference Preface Board of Canada Transportation infrastructure plays an integral role in the socio-economic well-being of Northern commun- We are: ities in Canada. It improves commercial prospects, The foremost independent, not-for-profit, applied strengthens regional connections, provides access to key research organization in Canada. health and social services, and facilitates the flow of Objective and non-partisan. We do not lobby people and goods. Moreover, it benefits all Canadians for specific interests. through its contribution to national sovereignty, safety, Funded exclusively through the fees we charge and security. Yet the challenges of developing transpor- for services to the private and public sectors. tation infrastructure in Northern communities, separated Experts in running conferences but also at con- in many cases by vast distances, are particularly acute. ducting, publishing, and disseminating research; The negative effects of climate change, such as perma- helping people network; developing individual frost degradation, are exacerbating these challenges. leadership skills; and building organizational capacity. This report examines the role of Northern transportation Specialists in economic trends, as well infrastructure development in creating community links, as organizational performance and public enhancing commercial prospects, and facilitating eco- policy issues. nomic growth. It features a case study of Churchill, Not a government department or agency, Manitoba, to look at lessons learned and to analyze the although we are often hired to provide implications of transportation infrastructure develop- services for all levels of government. -
An Intelligent Transportation Systems (Its) Plan for Canada: En Route to Intelligent Mobility
Transport Transports TP 13501 E Canada Canada AN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS) PLAN FOR CANADA: EN ROUTE TO INTELLIGENT MOBILITY November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................1 1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................5 2. ADDRESSING TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES.............................................5 3. WHAT ARE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS?..............................7 4. BENEFITS OF ITS....................................................................................................9 5. AN ITS PLAN FOR CANADA - VISION AND SCOPE ..........................................12 6. MISSION: EN ROUTE TO INTELLIGENT MOBILITY .........................................14 7. OBJECTIVES .........................................................................................................14 8. PILLARS OF THE ITS PLAN.................................................................................17 9. MILESTONES.........................................................................................................27 10. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................30 APPENDIX A ........................................................................................................... i An ITS Plan for Canada: En Route to Intelligent Mobility An ITS Plan for Canada: En Route to Intelligent -
Manitoba Fiscal Performance Review
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS CASE: REDUCING DIRECT SUPPORT TO BUSINESS Manitoba Fiscal Performance Review Phase 2 Report Business Case – Reducing Direct Support to Business CONFIDENTIAL Notice This Phase 2 report (the “Report”) by KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) is provided to The Province of Manitoba’s Treasury Board represented by the Minister of Finance (“Manitoba”) pursuant to the consulting service agreement dated July 14, 2016 to conduct an independent fiscal performance review (the “Review”) of Core Government spending (except the Department of Health) for Manitoba. If this Report is received by anyone other than Manitoba, the recipient is placed on notice that the attached Report has been prepared solely for Manitoba for its own internal use and this Report and its contents may not be shared with or disclosed to anyone by the recipient without the express written consent of KPMG and Manitoba. KPMG does not accept any liability or responsibility to any third party who may use or place reliance on our Report. Our scope was limited to a review and observations over a relatively short timeframe. The intention of the Report is to develop business cases for select areas of opportunity. The procedures we performed were limited in nature and extent, and those procedures will not necessarily disclose all matters about departmental functions, policies and operations, or reveal errors in the underlying information. Our procedures consisted of inquiry, observation, comparison and analysis of Manitoba-provided information. In addition, we considered leading practices. Readers are cautioned that the potential cost improvements outlined in this Report are order of magnitude estimates only. Actual results achieved as a result of implementing opportunities are dependent upon Manitoba and department actions and variations may be material. -
END of an ERA Roger Gibbins Retires After 14 Years at the Helm of the Canada West Foundation
WINDOW ON THE 2012 MAY WEST www.cwf.ca western canadian policy matters END OF AN ERA Roger Gibbins retires after 14 years at the helm of the Canada West Foundation > Unlocking Manitoba’s Transportation Gateway > Reflections on a Dynamic and Prosperous West > Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel A Strong West in a Strong Canada The Canada West Foundation is the only think tank dedicated to being the objective voice for public policy issues of vital concern to western Canadians. Sometimes these issues are unique to the West, but more often they resonate right across Canada. We are resolutely nonpartisan. We let the research do the talking rather than rely on predetermined positions. Our goals are straightforward: better government policy; a prosperous West in a prosperous Canada; fair treatment of all regions in the federation; and a strong democracy based on open debate and meaningful citizen engagement. Over the past 40 years, our research and recommendations have advanced all four of these goals. We are a source of ideas and information. We are a facilitator of discussion and civic participation. We give the people of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba a voice. A voice for their aspirations, interests and concerns. As westerners, we understand the people and the places of the West. We know our history and how it influences our future. Whether it is the economy, energy, environment, education, healthcare, taxes, social services, urban issues, intergovernmental relations or any other policy area of importance to the West, we have researched it, commented on it, stimulated debate about it and recommended practical options for improving the policy response—all from a uniquely western point of view. -
City of Winnipeg 2020 Infrastructure Plan
City of Winnipeg 2020 Infrastructure Plan December 2019 Vision To be a vibrant and healthy city which places its highest priority in quality of life for all its citizens. Corporate Mission Working together to achieve affordable, responsive and innovative public service. Table of contents Introduction ............................................................. 4 Organizational Context • City Asset Management Plan ........................................... 5 • State of the Infrastructure Report ....................................... 6 • Unfunded Major Capital Projects Report ................................. 6 • Multi-Year Budget Process ............................................. 6 Investment Planning & Prioritization • Investment Planning Framework ........................................ 7 • Investment Prioritization ............................................... 7 • Weighted Benefit Criteria ............................................... 8 • Service Usage and Importance ......................................... 9 • Service Impact ....................................................... 9 • Cost Benefit Points Ratio & Ranking .................................... 10 • Potential Impact of Federal Infrastructure Funding Program .............. 10 Infrastructure Plan • Scope & Purpose .................................................... 11 • Infrastructure Plan Prioritized Investment Needs ........................ 12 • Summary ........................................................... 16 • Detailed Project Listing .............................................. -
The Prince Rupert Container Port and Its Impact on Northern British Columbia
Canadian Political Science Review 2(4) December 2008 Transformation, Transportation or Speculation? The Prince Rupert Container Port and its Impact on Northern British Columbia Gary N. Wilson and Tracy Summerville (University of Northern British Columbia)1 Abstract2 Much of the discussion around the port development in Prince Rupert has focused on the positive impacts that the container port will have on the regional economy. As the opening quote suggests, the port is being hailed a piece of “transformational infrastructure”, creating numerous opportunities for economic diversification in northern British Columbia. In this sense, therefore, it is widely expected that the container port will help to move the northern economy beyond the type of traditional resource dependency outlined by scholars such as Harold Innis (Drache, 1995). This article argues, however, that there are at least two other potential outcomes or scenarios concerning the port’s development and its impact on northern British Columbia which call into question some of the assumptions made by the port’s proponents. First, the port might be a great success as a gateway to a transportation corridor that stretches across western Canada and into the United States, but have little or no positive impact on the northern British Columbia economy. Second, the port might not live up to the expectations that have been set nationally or locally neither as a transportation gateway nor as a piece of transformational infrastructure “The port has been described not only as transportation infrastructure, but as ‘transformational infrastructure’ because it’s going to transform northern BC’s economy.” (Vancouver Sun, January 14, 2005). -
Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C. -
Estimating the Marginal Effect of Pits and Quarries on Rural Residential Property Values in Wellington County, Ontario: a Hedonic Approach
Estimating the Marginal Effect of Pits and Quarries on Rural Residential Property Values in Wellington County, Ontario: A Hedonic Approach by Alison Grant A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Program Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Alison Grant, June, 2017 ABSTRACT Estimating the Marginal Effect of Pits and Quarries on Rural Residential Property Values in Wellington County, Ontario: A Hedonic Approach Alison Grant Advisor: Dr. Brady Deaton University of Guelph, 2017 Committee: Dr. Jessica Cao Dr. Richard Vyn “Aggregate” material – i.e., sand, gravel, clay, and bedrock – are extracted from pits and quarries throughout Ontario. Aggregates are the number one resource extracted (by value) and used by Ontarians, and approximately $1.2 billion of aggregate material was extracted in Ontario in the last year. While aggregate is a valued resource, the extraction of aggregate is often identified as a negative externality. Similar to other environmental disamenities mentioned in the literature – such as shale gas exploration sites, wind turbines and landfills – residents near aggregate extraction identify a host of events that can be categorized as negative externalities. Residential concerns include noise and visual disamenities, as well as environmental concerns, such as diminished water quality. In this study, I assess the potential impacts of aggregate sites. First, I briefly introduce the perceived impacts of aggregate sites by quoting residents’ concerns through newspaper articles and lobby group websites. I then utilize the hedonic model to test these claims made by residents: namely, the negative effect on property values. -
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AROUND INTERMODAL FACILITIES in CANADA William P
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AROUND INTERMODAL FACILITIES IN CANADA William P. Anderson and Sarah M. Dunphy, University of Windsor Introduction Freight distribution systems have changed significantly due in large part to the globalization of production. Expanding international trade has led to growth in both marine container shipments and air cargo. This has led, in turn, to development of new systems of surface transportation whereby goods in international trade move from their points of origins to marine ports and airports and then ultimately to their points of destination. These systems are characterized by the emergence of spatial clusters of logistics-intensive activities that serve a variety of functions. (For a review see Sheffi, 2012.) Some of these clusters have become engines of regional economic growth. Based on cases like Alliance Texas Global Logistics Hub and Centerpoint Intermodal Center in Illinois, each of which has close to 30,000 direct employees, many regional governments and develop- ment authorities have defined the establishment of clustered trans- portation and logistics activities as major components of regional economic plans. The proliferation of recent and ongoing feasibility studies points to the prominence of logistics clusters in development planning in the US and Canada (McMaster, 2009; Boile et al., 2009; De Cerreño et al., 2008; Harrison et al., 2005). This paper presents an initial exploration of the potential of logistics clusters as regional economic growth engines in Canada. It begins with a review of the “inland port” concept, whereby clusters develop around intermodal facilities connected to ocean ports. This is followed with a review of the main ocean ports and intermodal 1 Anderson & Dunphy facilities in Canada. -
Port Alberta Project Update
6. General Manager of Planning and Port Alberta Project Development Department. As well, the 2 City contributed financially to support Update the vital research and management of the initiative. Recommendation: The Port Alberta Steering Committee That the April 13, 2011, Planning and directed the activities of Port Alberta Development Department report from 2008 to mid 2010. The Steering 2011PGM007 be received for Committee was comprised of key information. stakeholder organizations including: Report Summary • Edmonton Airports • Edmonton Chamber of Commerce; This report provides an update regarding the incorporation and • City of Edmonton advancement of Port Alberta initiative • Edmonton Economic Development since the May 25, 2010, Executive Corporation Committee meeting. • Western Economic Diversification Canada Report • Government of Alberta (Enterprise Background and Finance and Alberta Transportation) Port Alberta is a transportation hub and • Leduc County regional inland port initiative that • City of Leduc represents a key strategic opportunity • Leduc-Nisku Economic Development as the Greater Edmonton Region’s link Authority to the global economy. Concept Development Port Alberta has developed from its initial concept to increase air cargo and In 2009 Port Alberta completed its inter-modal capacity at the Edmonton research, communications and International Airport, to a functioning determinations on corporate structure industry-led organization with a broader and governance. regional mandate. Three major research modules set out In November 2010 a new Board of the value propositions for Port Alberta industry members was established and and set out an implementation strategy Port Alberta was incorporated as a not- to develop the concept. for-profit company under the Alberta Companies Act on December 2, 2010. -
Windsor-Essex Parkway
Backgrounder The Windsor-Essex Parkway The Windsor-Essex Parkway is part of a long-term transportation solution to improve the movement of goods and people between the Windsor-Detroit border – a vital gateway and key to Ontario’s economic well-being. Project Features The Windsor-Essex Parkway will continue Ontario’s Highway 401 through the municipalities of Tecumseh, LaSalle and Windsor. The Parkway’s design consists of a six- lane below-grade freeway which is an extension of Highway 401, a four-lane service road network which is an extension of Highway 3 and naturalized green space that will distance adjacent residents from the border-bound traffic travelling on the freeway. The Parkway is a once-in-a-generation undertaking. It is unprecedented in its community enhancement features for any highway, anywhere in Ontario and will include: • 11 tunnels covering 1.8 kilometres of freeway • extensive landscaping throughout the corridor • the use of proven techniques to reduce noise levels • special measures to protect wildlife. Vision Upon completion, the 11 kilometre Parkway will ease the movement of goods and people to and from the Windsor-Detroit border, separate local and international traffic, and eliminate stop-and-go traffic in residential areas. With more than 300 acres of green space, 20 kilometres of recreational trails and new community connections, residents in Windsor-Essex will enjoy an improved quality of life. Delivery method The Parkway is the first Ontario road project to be delivered using an alternative financing and procurement (AFP) model – a public-private partnership delivery method. In December 2010, the province signed a fixed-price contract with the Windsor Essex Mobility Group (WEMG) to design, build, finance and to provide long-term maintenance of the Windsor- Essex Parkway. -
Transportation Needs
Chapter 2 – Transportation Needs 407 TRANSITWAY – WEST OF BRANT STREET TO WEST OF HURONTARIO STREET MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION 2.6.4. Sensitivity Analysis 2-20 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.7. Systems Planning – Summary of Findings 2-21 2. TRANSPORTATION NEEDS 2-1 2.1. Introduction 2-1 2.1.1. Background 2-1 2.1.2. Scope of Systems Planning 2-1 2.1.3. Study Corridor 2-1 2.1.4. Approach 2-2 2.1.5. Overview of the Chapter 2-2 2.2. Existing Conditions and Past Trends 2-2 2.2.1. Current Land Use 2-2 2.2.2. Transportation System 2-3 2.2.3. Historic Travel Trends 2-4 2.2.4. Current Demands and System Performance 2-5 2.3. Future Conditions 2-7 2.3.1. Land Use Changes 2-7 2.3.2. Transportation Network Changes 2-8 2.3.3. Changes in Travel Patterns 2-9 2.3.4. Future Demand and System Performance 2-10 2.4. Service Concept 2-13 2.4.1. Operating Characteristics 2-13 2.4.2. Conceptual Operating and Service Strategy 2-13 2.5. Vehicle Maintenance and Storage support 2-14 2.5.1. Facility Need 2-14 2.5.2. West Yard – Capacity Assessment 2-15 2.5.3. West Yard – Location 2-15 2.6. Transitway Ridership Forecasts 2-15 2.6.1. Strategic Forecasts 2-15 2.6.2. Station Evaluation 2-17 2.6.3. Revised Forecasts 2-18 DRAFT 2-0 . Update ridership forecasts to the 2041 horizon; 2.