NASA Reference Publication 1076

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NASA Reference Publication 1076 NASA Reference Publication 1076 Satellite Power System: Concept Development and Evaluation Program Volume 111 - Power Transmission and Reception Technical Summary and Assessment R. H. Dietz, G. D. Amdt, J. W. Seyl, L. Leopold, and J. S. Kelley Lyndon E. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1981 CONTENTS Section Page SUMMARY..... .......................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ......................... 3 11. OVERVIEW ........................... 5 A. SYSTEM ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES ............... 5 1. SOLAR POWER SATELLITE CONTRACTED EFFORTS ....... 6 2. IN-HOUSE NASA EFFORTS ................. 6 3. SYSTEM WORRSHOP .................... 6 a. Workshop Organization ............... 6 b. Review Panel Report: Summary ........... 7 B. SYSTEM OPTIONS ...................... 7 C. SYSTEM DEFINITION DRIVERS ................. 9 D. REFERENCE SYSTEM UPDATES AND STUDIES ........... 10 1. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE .................. 10 2. PHASE CONTROL .................... 13 3. POWER AMPLIFIERS ................... 13 4. RADIATING ELEMENTS .................. 13 5. ECTENNA ....................... 13 E. SOLID-STATE CONFIGURATIONS ................ 13 F. CRITICAL SUPPORTING INVESTIGATIONS ............ 14 G. CONCLUSIONS AND REMAINING ISSUES ............. 14 iii Section Page 111 . SYSTEM STUDIES ........................ 15 A . SYSTEM PERFORMANCE .................... 15 1. REFERENCE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS ............ 18 a . Phase Control to the Power Module (Tube) Level ....................... 18 b . Allowable Amplitude Jitter ............ 18 c . Metal-Matrix Waveguides .............. 20 d . Startup/Shutdown Procedure ............ 20 2 . COST SENSITIVITIES FOR THE REFERENCE SYSTEM EFFICIENCY CHAIN ................... 20 a . Klystron dc-rf Conversion Efficiency (85 Percent) ................... 22 b . Transmitting Antenna Efficiency (96.5 Percent) .................. 24 c . Rectenna Energy Collection Efficiency (88Percent) ................... 26 3 . ENVIRONMENT& CONSIDERATIONS ............. 30 a . Ionosphere .................... 30 b . Atmosphere .................... 31 c . Radiofrequency Interference ............ 31 4 . ALTERNATE SYSTEMS ................... 46 a . Smaller System Sizing Trade-offs ......... 47 b . Optimized Microwave Systems .2450 and 5800 Megahertz .................. 47 c . Magnetron. Laser. and Solid-state Configurations .................. 59 iv Section Page B . PHASE CONTROL ....................... 62 1. SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND CONCEPTS ........... 62 a . System Requirements ................ 62 b . System Concepts .................. 63 c . Conclusions and Remaining Issues ......... 64 2 . REFERENCE PHASE CONTROL SYSTEM ............ 67 a . Reference System Description ........... 67 b . Reference System Performance Evaluation ...... 74 c . End-to-End System Performance Evaluation ..... 80 3 . ALTERNATE PHASE CONTROL CONCEPTS ........... 87 a . Interferometer-Based Phase Control System ..... 87 b . Coherent Multiple-Tone Ground-Based Phase Control System .................. 90 4 . IONOSPHERfC/ATMOSPHERIC CONSIDERATIONS ........ 94 a . Ionospheric Effects on Single-Tone Pilot Beam ... 94 b . Three-Tone Pilot-Beam System for Mitigating Ionospheric Effects ................ 97 C . POWER AMPLIFIERS ..................... 102 1. INTRODUCTION ..................... 102 a . Conclusions .................... 102 b . Power Amplifier Remaining Issues ......... 103 2 . KLYSTRONS ....................... 104 a . Reference Description ............... 104 b . High-Efficiency Klystron Design Assessment .... 107 c . Life and Reliability Assessment .......... 111 d . High-Power Klystron Trade Studies ......... 114 V Section Page 3 . MAGNETRONS ...................... 114 a . Desirable Features of the Crossed-Field Microwave Generator ................ 117 b . Integration Into the Antenna Subarray ....... 119 c . Phase and Amplitude Tracking ........... 119 d . Noise Emission Properties ............. 121 e . Cathode Life of 50 Years ............. 123 4 . SOLID-STATE POWER AMPLIFIERS ............. 125 a . Device Technology for SPS During 1978 and 1979 ....................... 126 b . Amplifier Development Program ........... 131 c . Technology Forecast ................ 132 D . RADIATING ELEMENTS .................... 133 1. CONCLUSIONS AND REMAINING ISSUES ........... 133 2 . REFERENCE DESIGN DESCRIPTION ............. 134 3 . WAVEGUIDE PARAMETERS AND PERFORMANCE ......... 136 a . Subarray Tolerances ................ 136 b . Radiating-Element Tolerances ........... 138 c . Receiving-Technique Evaluation .......... 139 4 . VARIATIONS ON WAVEGUIDE TECHNIQUES .......... 141 a . Resonant Cavity Radiator ............. 141 b . Thin-Wall Slotted-Waveguide Array Fabrication ... 143 5 . HIGH-ACCURACY MEASmMENT mCHNIQUES ......... 144 vi Section Page E . RECTENNA ......................... 146 1. REFERENCE CONFIGURATION AND PERFORMANCE ........ 150 a . Scattering and Radiofrequency Interference .... 156 b . Rectenna System Optimization ........... 159 c . Rectenna Construction ............... 159 d . Direct-Current Power Combining .......... 159 e . Measured Rectenna Array Performance ........ 161 f . Lightning Protection ............... 162 2 . ALTERNATE CONCEPTS .................. 162 a . Medium-Gain Elements ......: ........ 163 b . High-Gain Elements ................ 163 c . Hogline Elements ................. 163 d . Waveguide Techniques ............... 164 e . Offshore Rectenna ................. 164 F . SOLID-STATE CONFIGURATIONS ................ 164 1. CONCLUSIONS ...................... 165 2 . REMAINING ISSUES ................... 166 3 . NOISE GENERATION ................... 167 4 . SEPARATE ANTENNA SYSTEM ................ 170 5 . SANDWICH SYSTEM .................... 177 a . Sandwich Concept ................. 180 b . Design Considerations ............... 180 c . Reference Phase Distribution ........... 188 vii Section Page IV. CRITICAL SUPPORTING INVESTIGATIONS .............. 193 A . DESIGN AND BJlEADBOARD EVALUATION OF THE SPS REFERENCE PHASE CONTROL SYSTEM ................... 193 B . FIBER OPTICS LINK ASSESSMENT ............... 200 C . S-BAND ACTIVE RETRODIRECTIVE ARRAY PHASE ERROR EVALUATION ........................ 204 1. PROCEDURE ....................... 204 2 . EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ................. 204 D . ANTENNA ELEMENT EVALUATION ................ 206 1. THEORY AND PROCEDURE ................. 206 2 . EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS SUMMARY ............. 211 E . SOLID-STATE ANTENNA POWER COMBINER ............ 211 1. PROGRAMSUMMARY .................... 212 2 . EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS ................. 217 F . SOLID-STATE AMPLIFIER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ......... 217 G . MAGNETRON TUBE ASSESSMENT ................. 218 H . MICROWAVE IONOSPHERIC INTERACTION EXPERIMENT ....... 223 V . SYSTEM CONCLUSIONS AND REMAINING ISSUES ............ 231 A . CONCLUSIONS ........................ 231 1. MICROWAVE POWER TRANSMISSION ............. 231 2 . SINGLE COMPARED TO MULTIPLE ANTENNAS ......... 231 3 . FREQUENCY ....................... 231 4 . MICROWAVE SYSTEM SIZING ................ 231 5 . TYPE OF TRANSMITTING ANTENNA ............. 231 viii Section Page 6 . TYPE OF RECEIVING ANTENNA ......... .... 232 7 . ANTENNA CONSTRUCTION AND SUBARRAY AL'INEMENT .. .. 232 8 . POWER BEAM STABILITY ........... .... 232 B . EMAINING ISSUES ............... .... 232 APPENDIX .WORKSHOP ON MICROWAVE POWER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM FOR THE SOLAR POWER SATELLITE. REVIEW PANEL FINAL REPORT ..... 235 REFERENCES ............................. 247 ix TABLES Table Page 111-1 CHARACTERISTICS AND ERROR PARAMETERS OF MODIFIED MICROWAVE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM .............. 21 111-2 COST AND MASS SUMMARY FOR REFERENCE SATELLITE SUBSYSTEMS DEPENDENT ON SOLAR ARRAY POWER .............. 23 111-3 LOSSES DUE TO POWER MODULE TOLERANCES ........... 27 111-4 ATTENUATION LOSSES FOR 5-GIGAWATT SYSTEMS ......... 32 111-5 SPS INTERFERENCE LEVEL AT TDRSS WITH 1' (700 KILOMETERS) SEPARATION ........................ 42 111-6 SPS-TO-SPS RFI FOR FOUR SCENARIOS ............. 43 111-7 SPS SUMMARY COSTS FOR 2.45-GIGAHERTZ OPERATION (a) Physical parameters .................. 51 (b) Costs ......................... 51 111-8 SPS SUMMARY COSTS FOR 5.8-GIGAHERTZ OPERATION (a) Physical parameters .................. 52 (b) Costs ......................... 52 111-9 SOLARSIM SUBROUTINE PACKAGE CAPABILITIES .......... 81 111-10 REFERENCE 70.6-KILOWATT KLYSTRON DESIGN CRITERIA ...... 106 111-11 ENERGY BALANCE IN REFERENCE FIVE-SEGMENT-COLLECTOR KLYSTRON DESIGN ..................... 109 111- 12 HARMONIC MEASUREMENTS ON REPRESENTATIVE TUBES ....... 124 111-13 CHARACTERISTICS OF FOUR SOLID-STATE DEVICES INVESTIGATED ....................... 127 111-14 SPS SUBARRAY LOSSES AND DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES ...... 137 111-15 MEASUREMENT ERROR BUDGET .................. 147 111-16 ANTENNA RANGE MEASUREMENT ERROR SUBBUDGET ......... 148 111- 17 ERROR SUBBUDGET FOR RECEImR ELECTRONICS (a) Allowable SPS errors ................. 149 (b) State-of-the-art performance ............. 149 X Table Page 111- 18 APPROACHES FOR DECREASING RECTENNA HARMONIC RADIATION ........................ 158 111-19 COMPARISON OF WEIGHTS AND LOSSES FOR VARIOUS VOLTAGE-DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ............... 178 111-20 SOLID-STATE-SANDWICH CONCEPT COMPARISON OF 0- AND 10-DECIBEL ANTENNA POWER TAPER .............. 183 111-21 RECOMMENDED SOLID-STATE-SANDWICH CONCEPT CHARACTERISTICS ...................... 184 111-22 NOMINAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GaAs-SANDWICH CONCEPT ...... 185 IV- 1 ITERATIVE DE SIGN PROCEDURE FOR RADIATING-STICK PARAMETERS.
Recommended publications
  • 25. Antennas II
    25. Antennas II Radiation patterns Beyond the Hertzian dipole - superposition Directivity and antenna gain More complicated antennas Impedance matching Reminder: Hertzian dipole The Hertzian dipole is a linear d << antenna which is much shorter than the free-space wavelength: V(t) Far field: jk0 r j t 00Id e ˆ Er,, t j sin 4 r Radiation resistance: 2 d 2 RZ rad 3 0 2 where Z 000 377 is the impedance of free space. R Radiation efficiency: rad (typically is small because d << ) RRrad Ohmic Radiation patterns Antennas do not radiate power equally in all directions. For a linear dipole, no power is radiated along the antenna’s axis ( = 0). 222 2 I 00Idsin 0 ˆ 330 30 Sr, 22 32 cr 0 300 60 We’ve seen this picture before… 270 90 Such polar plots of far-field power vs. angle 240 120 210 150 are known as ‘radiation patterns’. 180 Note that this picture is only a 2D slice of a 3D pattern. E-plane pattern: the 2D slice displaying the plane which contains the electric field vectors. H-plane pattern: the 2D slice displaying the plane which contains the magnetic field vectors. Radiation patterns – Hertzian dipole z y E-plane radiation pattern y x 3D cutaway view H-plane radiation pattern Beyond the Hertzian dipole: longer antennas All of the results we’ve derived so far apply only in the situation where the antenna is short, i.e., d << . That assumption allowed us to say that the current in the antenna was independent of position along the antenna, depending only on time: I(t) = I0 cos(t) no z dependence! For longer antennas, this is no longer true.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.2% 130,000 155M Top 1% 154 5,300
    We are IntechOpen, the world’s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 5,300 130,000 155M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 154 TOP 1% 12.2% Countries delivered to most cited scientists Contributors from top 500 universities Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI) Interested in publishing with us? Contact [email protected] Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected. For more information visit www.intechopen.com Chapter 5 Electromagnetic Radiation Energy Harvesting – The Rectenna Based Approach Gabriel Abadal, Javier Alda and Jordi Agustí Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/57118 1. Introduction The energy available in the electromagnetic spectrum How much energy is available around us? Which use can we give to this energy? These are two questions to which answers had been changing over time. What would be our particular answer if a forefather or an ancestor would ask them to us? Some sources of energy like sun, wind or sea waves have been present unaltered since the prehistoric times and before to nowadays. Some others like oil and natural gas have been progressively reduced by the action of man. But it is interesting to notice that there are some other sources, which we can name as artificial sources, and that have emerged by man’s action, as a consequence of industrial and technological development. Such modern or artificial energy sources are directly connected to the energy harvesting technology since, for instance, most of the vibrations or temperature gradients are produced by machines and engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings
    Thursday & Friday, August 18-19 PROCEEDINGS PROGRAM & PROCEEDINGS COLORADO CENTER FOR ADVANCED CERAMICS 3rd Annual Meeting Estes Park, Colorado AUGUST 18-19, 2011 Organized by Prakash Periasamy Liangju Kuang Taylor Wilkinson Sarah McMurray Prakash Periasamy, Chair Liangju Kuang Taylor Wilkinson Sarah McMurray Welcome to the meeting, It is with a great pleasure I welcome you all for this year’s CCAC 2011 conference in a beautiful location, Estes Park – the home of the Rocky Mountain National Park. This is the 3rd edition of this conference. As an organizing chair, I’m very de- lighted to introduce major changes to the conference this year. For the first time, we expanded the conference to a two-day event, mainly to accommodate more active discussions between the participants. In addition we have introduced a tutorial on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). This Tutorial is one of a kind effort and is prepared and will be taught by graduate students to graduate students. In this tutorial a unique treatment is given to EIS and is targeted towards beginners and assuming no precedence of participant’s knowledge on this subject. All these wouldn’t be possible if not for the trust in us by our Center Director, Prof. Ivar Reimanis. During the early stages of conference planning, when this idea was proposed to him, he encouraged and supported our new ideas. I’m very thankful to REMRSEC (Renewable Energy Materials Research Science and Engineering Center), CFCC (Colorado Fuel Cell Center), GSA (Graduate Student Association, CSM) and NSF (National Science Foundation) for their generous financial support in sponsoring this conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanoantennas for Solar Energy Harvesting
    Nanoantennas for Solar Energy Harvesting Ahmed M A Sabaawi Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2015 TO my beloved wife, Nadia AND my loving sons, Omar , Mohammed, Yousif and Ibrahim. Acknowledgements After the end of my four-year journey in PhD study, I must begin my ac- knowledgement with thanking the almighty Allah for giving me the strength and the courage to be what I am now. I am using this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to many kind people around me who supported me throughout my PhD study. It would not have been possible to write this thesis without their help and support, to whom I would like to give particular mention here. First and foremost I wish to thank my first supervisor, Dr Charalampos Tsi- menidis, for his aspiring guidance and constructive criticism which paved my way during my study. From him, I received unlimited help and support and from him I learnt how to think positively and how to be a successful researcher. I would also like to show my greatest appreciation to my second supervisor, Prof Bayan Sharif, for his invaluable friendly advices on both aca- demic and personal level, for which I am extremely grateful. I am sincerely grateful to both of my supervisors for being supportive and helpful since the days I began working on my project. I express my warm thanks to my fellow postgraduate students at the school of Electrical and Electronics Engineering: Ibrahim, Sabah, Abdulrahman, Mohamad, Emad, Muayad, Salah, Sedki, Sangar and Oras for their endless support and for sharing their truthful and illuminating views on a number of issues related to the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Antenna Theory and Matching
    Antenna Theory and Matching Farrukh Inam Applications Engineer LPRF TI 1 Agenda • Antenna Basics • Antenna Parameters • Radio Range and Communication Link • Antenna Matching Example 2 What is an Antenna • Converts guided EM waves from a transmission line to spherical wave in free space or vice versa. • Matches the transmission line impedance to that of free space for maximum radiated power. • An important design consideration is matching the antenna to the transmission line (TL) and the RF source. The quality of match is specified in terms of VSWR or S11. • Standing waves are produced when RF power is not completely delivered to the antenna. In high power RF systems this might even cause arching or discharge in the transmission lines. • Resistive/dielectric losses are also undesirable as they decrease the efficiency of the antenna. 3 When does radiation occur • EM radiation occurs when charge is accelerated or decelerated (time-varying current element). • Stationary charge means zero current ⇒ no radiation. • If charge is moving with a uniform velocity ⇒ no radiation. • If charge is accelerated due to EMF or due to discontinuities, such as termination, bend, curvature ⇒ radiation occurs. 4 Commonly Used Antennas • PCB antennas – No extra cost – Size can be demanding at sub 433 MHz (but we have a good solution!) – Good performance at > 868 MHz • Whip antennas – Expensive solutions for high volume – Good performance – Hard to fit in many applications • Chip antennas – Medium cost – Good performance at 2.4 GHz – OK performance at 868-955
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Hazard Analysis KVH Industries Carlsbad, CA
    Radiation Hazard Analysis KVH Industries Carlsbad, CA This analysis predicts the radiation levels around a proposed earth station complex, comprised of one (reflector) type antennas. This report is developed in accordance with the prediction methods contained in OET Bulletin No. 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, pp 26-30. The maximum level of non-ionizing radiation to which employees may be exposed is limited to a power density level of 5 milliwatts per square centimeter (5 mW/cm2) averaged over any 6 minute period in a controlled environment and the maximum level of non-ionizing radiation to which the general public is exposed is limited to a power density level of 1 milliwatt per square centimeter (1 mW/cm2) averaged over any 30 minute period in a uncontrolled environment. Note that the worse-case radiation hazards exist along the beam axis. Under normal circumstances, it is highly unlikely that the antenna axis will be aligned with any occupied area since that would represent a blockage to the desired signals, thus rendering the link unusable. Earth Station Technical Parameter Table Antenna Actual Diameter 1 meters Antenna Surface Area 0.8 sq. meters Antenna Isotropic Gain 34.5 dBi Number of Identical Adjacent Antennas 1 Nominal Antenna Efficiency (ε) 67.50% Nominal Frequency 6.138 GHz Nominal Wavelength (λ) 0.0489 meters Maximum Transmit Power / Carrier 22.0 Watts Number of Carriers 1 Total Transmit Power 22.0 Watts W/G Loss from Transmitter to Feed 1.0 dB Total Feed Input Power 17.48 Watts Near Field Limit Rnf = D²/4λ =5.12 meters Far Field Limit Rff = 0.6 D²/λ = 12.28 meters Transition Region Rnf to Rff In the following sections, the power density in the above regions, as well as other critically important areas will be calculated and evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Nano-Rectenna Project
    The nano Rectenna Project Design and Applications of UWB Nano-Antenna Arrays Zeev Iluz, Yuval Yifat, Doron Bar-Lev, Michal Eitan, Yoni Kantarovsky, Yoav Blau, Yael Hanein, Koby Scheuer, and Amir Boag School of Electrical Engineering Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 1 The nano Rectenna Project Tel Aviv University Largest of the 7 universities in Israel with ~ 28000 students 3 The nano Rectenna Project Why Nanoantennas? Field Field Field Design Coupling localization enhancement detection flexibility from near to • Breaks the diffraction • Up to 40dB power • Phase • Wavelength far field limit (10-50nm enhancement sensitive scaling* – Hybrid • Efficient resolution) - Imaging • Increased detectors detectors surface • Smaller effective phenomena photodetectors (less absorption cross detection dark current, faster section • Load dependence response) - Detection • Enhancing response – • Increasing resolution nonlinear optics sensing, active - information antennas processing * P. Bharadwaj, B. Deutsch & L. Novotny, "Optical Antennas", Adv. Opt. Photon. 1, 438-483 (2009). Plasmonics and nano-antenna projects Broadband antennas Rectennas Particle trapping D A E B F G Nonlinear optics Sensors Holography 5 The nano Rectenna Project UWB Antennas and Rectennas • Motivation • Rectenna concept • Dual-Vivaldi design • Fabrication • Performance evaluation • Rectifying devices • Conclusion and Applications 6 The nano Rectenna Project Motivation for Solar Energy Harvesting • Technology = Power Quadrillion BTU Quadrillion BTU Quadrillion Contemporary
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Antennas for Harvesting Solar Radiation Energy Waleed Tariq Sethi
    Optical antennas for harvesting solar radiation energy Waleed Tariq Sethi To cite this version: Waleed Tariq Sethi. Optical antennas for harvesting solar radiation energy. Electronics. Université Rennes 1, 2018. English. NNT : 2018REN1S129. tel-02295386 HAL Id: tel-02295386 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02295386 Submitted on 24 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THÈSE / UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1 sous le sceau de l’Université Bretagne Loire pour le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1 Mention : Traitement de Signal et Télécommunications Ecole doctorale MathSTIC présentée par Waleed Tariq Sethi préparée à l’unité de recherche IETR (UMR 6164) (Institut d’Electronique et de Télécommunications de Rennes UFR Informatique et Electronique Thèse soutenue à Rennes le 16 Février 2018 Optical antennas devant le jury composé de : for harvesting solar Guillaume Ducournau IEMN Université Lille 1 / Polytech'Lille, France / radiation energy rapporteur Paola Russo Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona, Italy / rapporteur Olivier
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Radiation Properties of the Antenna As a Function of Space Coordinates
    LECTURE 4: Fundamental Antenna Parameters (Radiation pattern. Pattern beamwidths. Radiation intensity. Directivity. Gain. Antenna efficiency and radiation efficiency. Frequency bandwidth. Input impedance and radiation resistance. Antenna equivalent area. Relationship between directivity and area.) The antenna parameters describe the antenna performance with respect to space distribution of the radiated energy, power efficiency, matching to the feed circuitry, etc. Many of these parameters are interrelated. There are several parameters not described here, such as antenna temperature and noise characteristics. They will be discussed later in conjunction with radiowave propagation and system performance. 1. Radiation pattern The radiation pattern (RP) (or antenna pattern) is the representation of the radiation properties of the antenna as a function of space coordinates. The RP is measured in the far-field region, where the spatial (angular) distribution of the radiated power does not depend on the distance. One can measure and plot the field intensity, e.g. ∼ E ()θ ,ϕ , or the received power 2 E ()θϕ, 2 ∼ =η H ()θ ,ϕ η The trace of the spatial variation of the received/radiated power at a constant radius from the antenna is called the power pattern. The trace of the spatial variation of the electric (magnetic) field at a constant radius from the antenna is called the amplitude field pattern. Usually, the pattern describes the normalized field (power) values with respect to the maximum value. Note: The power pattern and the amplitude field pattern are the same when computed and plotted in dB. 1 The pattern can be a 3-D plot (both θ and ϕ vary), or a 2-D plot.
    [Show full text]
  • ISOTROPIC RADIATOR in General, Isotropic Radiator Is a Hypothetical
    Lecture 8 Antenna And Wave Propagation Isotropic Antenna ISOTROPIC RADIATOR In general, isotropic radiator is a hypothetical or fictitious radiator. The isotropic radiator is defined as a radiator which radiates energy in all directions uniformly. It is also called isotropic source. As it radiates uniformly in all directions. Basically isotropic radiator is a lossless ideal radiator or antenna. Generally all the practical antennas are compared with the characteristics of the isotropic radiator. The isotropic antenna or radiator is used as reference antenna. Practically all antennas show directional properties i.e. directivity property. That means none of the antennas radiate energy in all directions uniformly. Hence practically isotropic radiator cannot exist. Figure 1: Isotropic radiator Consider that an isotropic radiator is placed at the center of sphere of radius (r). Then all the power radiated by the isotropic radiator passes over the surface area of the sphere given by (4πr) assuming zero absorption of the power. Then at any point on the surface, the Poynting vector W gives the power radiated per unit area in any direction. But radiated power travels in the radial direction. Thus the magnitude of the Poynting vector W will be equal to radial component as the components in θ and ∅ directions are zero i.e. 푊휃=푊∅=0. Type equation here.Hence we can write, Technical College / communication Dept. 1 By: Ghufran M. Hatem Lecture 8 Antenna And Wave Propagation Isotropic Antenna |푊| = 푊푟 The total power radiated is given by, 2 푃푟푎푑 = ∮ 푊 푑푠 = ∮ 푊푟 푑푠 = 푊° ∮ 푑푠 = 4휋푟 푊° Where 푊° = 푃푎푣푔 = Average power density component ∮ 푑푠 = 4휋푟2=surface of sphere 푃 푃 = 푟푎푑 푎푣푔 4휋푟2 Where, P푟푎푑 = Total power radiated in watts r = Radius of sphere in meters 2 푃푎푣푔 =Radial component of average power density in W/m Electric Field of Isotropic Antenna The Point source is located at the origin point O, then the power density at the point Q is given as 푃푟푎푑 2 W 푃 = 4휋푟 … … … … … (1) 푎푣푔 m2 The power density is related to the electric and magnetic field 2 1 ∗ 퐸 1 2 푊 = 푅푒|퐸.
    [Show full text]
  • Antenna Sources Radiate Energy Equally in All Directions
    ISOTROPIC RADIATOR Figure-1: The Sun is considered an isotropic radiator. Some antenna sources radiate energy equally in all directions. The energy radiated measured at any fixed distance and from any angle will be approximately the same. An isotropic radiator is a ‘theoretical’ point source of waves, which exhibits the same magnitude or properties when measured in all directions. It has no preferred direction of radiation. It radiates uniformly in all directions over a sphere centered on the source. It is a reference radiator with which other sources are compared. Isotropic radiators obey Lambert's law. Antenna Theory In antenna theory, the isotropic radiator is a theoretical radiator having a directivity of ‘0 dBi” (dB relative to isotropic), which means that the radiator equally transmits (or receives) electromagnetic radiation from any arbitrary direction. In reality, a coherent isotropic radiator cannot exist, as the isotropic radiator, with a radiation pattern (as expressed in spherical coordinates) of 1 (note that this function is independent of the spherical angles and would violate the Helmholtz Wave Equation, as derived from Maxwell's Equations.) Although the Sun and other stars radiate equally in all directions, their radiation pattern does not violate Maxwell's equations, because radiation from a star is incoherent. Even though an isotropic radiator cannot exist in practice, antenna directivity is usually compared to the directivity of an isotropic radiator, because the gain (which is closely related to directivity) relative to an isotropic radiator is useful in the Friis transmission equation. The smallest directivity a radiator can have relative to an isotropic radiator, is a Hertzian Dipole, which has +2.14 dBi.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement and Simulation of Reflector Antenna L.J.Foged , M.A
    Measurement and Simulation of Reflector Antenna L.J.Foged , M.A. Saporetti , M. Sierra-Castanner , E. Jorgensen , T. Voigt , F. Calvano , D. Tallini Abstract— Well-established procedures are consolidated to II. MEASUREMENT CAMPAIGN determine the associated measurement uncertainty for a given antenna and measurements scenario [1-2]. Similar criteria for Comparative measurements based on high accuracy establishing uncertainties in numerical modelling of the same reference antennas and involving different antenna antenna are still to be established. In this paper, we investigate measurement systems are important instruments in the the achievable agreement between antenna measurement and evaluation, benchmarking and calibration of the measurement simulation when external error sources are minimized. The test facilities. Regular inter comparisons are also an important object, is a reflector fed by a wideband dual ridge horn (SR40-A instrument for traceability and quality maintenance. These and SH4000). The highly stable reference antenna has been activities promote and document the measurement confidence selected to minimize uncertainty related to finite manufacturing and material parameter accuracy. Two frequencies, 10.7GHz level among the participants and are an important prerequisite and 18GHz have been selected for detailed investigation. for official or unofficial certification of the facilities. Different European facility comparison campaigns, have The antenna has been measured in two reference spherical near-field measurement facilities as a preparatory activity for a been completed during the last years in the framework of Facility Comparison Campaign on this antenna in the frame of a different European Activities: Antenna Measurement Activity EurAAP/WG5 activity. A full CAD model, in step compatible of the Antenna Centre of Excellence-VT UE Frame Program; format, has been provided and the antenna has been simulated COST ASSIST, IC0603 and COST-VISTA, IC1102.
    [Show full text]