Large-Scale Photospheric Motions Determined from Granule Tracking and Helioseismology from SDO/HMI Data Th

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Large-Scale Photospheric Motions Determined from Granule Tracking and Helioseismology from SDO/HMI Data Th A&A 611, A92 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732014 Astronomy & © ESO 2018 Astrophysics Large-scale photospheric motions determined from granule tracking and helioseismology from SDO/HMI data Th. Roudier1, M. Švanda2,3, J. Ballot1, J. M. Malherbe4, and M. Rieutord1 1 Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, CNES, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astronomical Institute (v. v. i.), Czech Academy of Sciences, Fricovaˇ 298, 25165 Ondrejov,ˇ Czech Republic 3 Charles University, Astronomical Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, V Holešovickáchˇ 2, 18000 Prague 8, Czech Republic 4 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Section de Meudon, 92195 Meudon, France Received 28 September 2017 / Accepted 5 December 2017 ABSTRACT Context. Large-scale flows in the Sun play an important role in the dynamo process linked to the solar cycle. The important large-scale flows are the differential rotation and the meridional circulation with an amplitude of km s−1 and few m s−1, respectively. These flows also have a cycle-related components, namely the torsional oscillations. Aims. Our attempt is to determine large-scale plasma flows on the solar surface by deriving horizontal flow velocities using the techniques of solar granule tracking, dopplergrams, and time–distance helioseismology. Methods. Coherent structure tracking (CST) and time-distance helioseismology were used to investigate the solar differential rotation and meridional circulation at the solar surface on a 30-day HMI/SDO sequence. The influence of a large sunspot on these large-scale flows with a specific 7-day HMI/SDO sequence has been also studied. Results. The large-scale flows measured by the CST on the solar surface and the same flow determined from the same data with the helioseismology in the first 1 Mm below the surface are in good agreement in amplitude and direction. The torsional waves are also located at the same latitudes with amplitude of the same order. We are able to measure the meridional circulation correctly using the CST method with only 3 days of data and after averaging between ±15◦ in longitude. Conclusions. We conclude that the combination of CST and Doppler velocities allows us to detect properly the differential solar rotation and also smaller amplitude flows such as the meridional circulation and torsional waves. The results of our methods are in good agreement with helioseismic measurements. Key words. Sun: atmosphere – Sun: granulation – Sun: helioseismology – Sun: rotation 1. Introduction concentrated magnetic field, which serves as a proxy, is anchored in the underlying solar plasma; both the magnetic field and the Large-scale motions in the solar convection zone are important solar plasma interact strongly in the convective zone, where the elements to understand the evolution of solar magnetism. Vari- plasma β parameter, which is the ratio of the plasma pressure ous methods (Paternò 2010), based on helioseismology (Gizon to the magnetic pressure (β = 2µP=B2), is large. In this way, the & Rempel 2008; Komm et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2014), Doppler study of the movements of proxies is delicate (Sudar et al. 2017) velocities measurements (Duvall 1979; Hathaway 1987), solar because observational biases can lead to contradictory results, magnetic tracers (e.g. sunspots, sunspot groups, faculae, bright such as in the measurement of the meridional circulation, the points; see Hathaway & Upton 2014) or surface feature (e.g. amplitude of which is only about 10 m s−1. Helioseismology cur- supergranule) tracking (Švanda et al. 2008; Hathaway 2012; rently provides the best measurement inside the Sun up to near Löptien et al. 2017) are used to infer the large-scale solar the surface of the plasma flows [from 30 to 1 Mm] (Howe 2009; flows. Advantages and disadvantages of various techniques are Zhao 2016). discussed and summarized by Hathaway & Upton(2014). One of the attempts to determine plasma motions on the sur- In particular, magnetic features do not behave as ideal trac- face of the full-disc Sun was made by Švanda et al.(2008) and ers because of their interactions with the surrounding plasma in a recent work by Löptien et al.(2017) using local correla- (Paternò 2010). The use of proxies may induce measurement tion tracking (LCT; November 1986). These works detect reliable biases. For example, the velocities measured using sunspots or motion of features that are carried by an underlying larger scale faculae as tracers presumably reflect the properties of deeper velocity field. They also show that a detection of torsional layers and therefore do not give access to the actual surface waves and meridional circulation is possible by applying the plasma motions (Javaraiah 2013; Li et al. 2013). It is well LCT method to MDI/SOHO and HMI/SDO Dopplergrams and establish now that rotation deduced from motion of sunspots is continuum intensity data, respectively. Nevertheless, the LCT systematically faster than that deduced from spectroscopic obser- method is subject to limitations when applied to whole Sun data. vations (Hathaway & Upton 2014). This is partly because the This technique is sensitive to the distance to the centre initially Article published by EDP Sciences A92, page 1 of9 A&A 611, A92 (2018) because the properties (e.g. size and contrast) of the granules 2. SDO/HMI observations change because of projection effects; secondly, the so-called shrinking effect due to the apparent asymmetry of granulation 2.1. SDO/HMI observations depends on the viewing angle inclined from the vertical, in com- bination with the expansion of the granules, gives an apparent The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI; Scherrer et al. motion towards the disc centre (Löptien et al. 2016). 2012; Schou et al. 2012) on board the Solar Dynamics Obser- Moreover, the LCT is well known for underestimating the vatory (SDO) provides uninterrupted observations of the full amplitude of the velocities by a factor that depends on a partic- disc of the Sun. This provides a unique opportunity to map sur- ular application and may reach up to factor 2 or 3 (Verma et al. face flows on various spatial and temporal scales. We selected 2013). the SDO/HMI continuum intensity data from 16 August to We propose applying the coherent structure tracking (CST; 14 September 2010. This period was chosen due to its low solar Rieutord et al. 2007; Roudier et al. 2012) code to follow the activity and also to get very small variations of the B0 angle. The proper motions of solar granules in full-disc HMI/SDO data. By solar differential rotation and meridional circulation are deter- measuring the flow field on the solar surface over a long time mined from SDO/HMI continuum intensity and Doppler data period we obtain a representative description of solar plasma taken during this 30-day sequence. A second HMI/SDO time evolution. The CST allows us to get flow field from covering the sequence from 12 to 18 April 2016 was used to describe the spatial scales from 2.5 Mm up to nearly 85% of the solar radius. effects of the flows around a large sunspot to the solar rota- This method is complementary to helioseismic methods of flow tion and meridional circulation. Both sequences use the original cadence of 45 s and the original pixel size of 000: 5. The resolution determination, which describes the flows below the solar sur- 00 face. The CST is a granule tracking technique, which allows us to of the HMI instrument is 1: 0. estimate the field direction and amplitude (Rieutord et al. 2007). The LCT and Fourier local correlation tracking (FLCT; Welsch 2.2. Data analysis et al. 2004; Fisher & Welsch 2008) account for both granules and intergranules when cross-correlating continuum images to The flows were measured with two independent methods. estimate the direction and amplitude of the field. The princi- pal difference between the LCT (FLCT) and CST techniques 2.2.1. Granulation tracking by CST is that the LCT (FLCT) evaluates the similarity of image sub- frames at different positions in different times. These subframes The CST used the solar granules as passive scalars to follow solar are required to contain distinct features (granules, supergranule, plasma motions. In order to be suitable for the CST application, etc.), but these features are not uniquely identified. Thus the sub- the data series of the HMI intensitygrams must first be prepared. frame displacement is evaluated based on an overall similarity. All frames of the sequence were aligned such that the centre of The LCT (FLCT) thus provides a smooth differentiable estimate the solar disc lies exactly on the same pixel in CCD coordinates of the velocity field. In CST, the code identifies individual fea- and the radius of the solar disc was exactly the same for all the tures (granules) and tracks these individual features coherently frames. The reference values for the position of the disc centre through out the image sequence. The resulting velocity field is and the radius were obtained from the first image (obtained on 16 thus discontinuous and the differentiable extension is estimated August 2010 at 00:00:45 UT) of the 30-day series. Then we per- based on multi-resolution analysis. formed the granulation tracking using the CST code (Roudier In this paper, we describe a comparison between velocity et al. 2012) to reconstruct the projection of the photospheric fields on the full Sun obtained by various methods (CST, LCT, velocity field (vx; vy) in the plane of the sky (CCD plane) (Rincon FLCT, and time–distance helioseismology). A 30-day sequence et al. 2017). The application of CST to such a series leads to a of quiet Sun spanning from 16 August to 14 September 2010 is sequence of horizontal velocity field maps in the projection to selected.
Recommended publications
  • From the Heliosphere Into the Sun Programme Book Incuding All
    511th WE-Heraeus-Seminar From the Heliosphere into the Sun –SailingagainsttheWind– Programme book incuding all abstracts Physikzentrum Bad Honnef, Germany January 31 – February 3, 2012 http://www.mps.mpg.de/meetings/heliocorona/ From the Heliosphere into the Sun A meeting dedicated to the progress of our understanding of the solar wind and the corona in the light of the upcoming Solar Orbiter mission This meeting is dedicated to the processes in the solar wind and corona in the light of the upcoming Solar Orbiter mission. Over the last three decades there has been astonishing progress in our understanding of the solar corona and the inner heliosphere driven by remote-sensing and in-situ observations. This period of time has seen the first high-resolution X-ray and EUV observations of the corona and the first detailed measurements of the ion and electron velocity distribution functions in the inner heliosphere. Today we know that we have to treat the corona and the wind as one single object, which calls for a mission that is fully designed to investigate the interwoven processes all the way from the solar surface to the heliosphere. The meeting will provide a forum to review the advances over the last decades, relate them to our current understanding and to discuss future directions. We will concentrate one day on in- situ observations and related models of the inner heliosphere, and spend another day on remote sensing observations and modeling of the corona – always with an eye on the symbiotic nature of the two. On the third day we will direct our view towards the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Is the Corona Hotter Than It Has Any Right to Be?
    Why is the corona hotter than it has any right to be? Sam Van Kooten CU Boulder SHINE 2019 Student Day Thanks to Steve Cranmer for some slides Why the Sun is the way it is The Sun is magnetically active The Sun rotates differentially Rotation + plasma = magnetism Magnetism + rotation = solar activity That’s why the Sun is the way it is Temperature Profile of the Solar Atmosphere Photosphere (top of the convection zone) Chromosphere (forest of complex structures) Corona (magnetic domination & heating conundrum) Coronal Heating ● How do you achieve those temperatures? ● Step 1: Have energy ● Step 2: Move energy ● Step 3: Turn energy to heat ● Step 4: Retain heat ● Step 5: HOT Step 1: Have energy ● The photosphere’s kinetic energy is enough by orders of magnitude Photospheric granulation Photospheric granulation Step 2: Move energy “DC” field-line braiding → “nanoflares” “AC” MHD waves “Taylor relaxation” “IR” (twist wants to untwist, due to mag. tension) Step 3: Turn energy to heat ● Turbulence ¯\_( )_/¯ ツ Step 4: Retain heat ● Very hot → complete ionization → no blackbody radiation → very limited cooling ● Combined with low density, required heat isn’t too mind-boggling Step 5: HOT So what’s the “coronal heating problem”? Cranmer & Winebarger (2019) So what’s the “coronal heating problem”? ● The theory side is fine ● All coronal heating models occur at small scales in thin plasmas – Really hard to see! ● It’s an observational problem – Can’t observe heating happening – Can’t measure or rule out models So why is the corona hotter than it
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Dimensional Convective Velocity Fields in the Solar Photosphere
    Three-dimensional convective velocity fields in the solar photosphere 太陽光球大気における3次元対流速度場 Takayoshi OBA Doctor of Philosophy Department of Space and Astronautical Science, School of Physical sciences, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies) submitted 2018 January 10 3 Abstract The solar photosphere is well-defined as the solar surface layer, covered by enormous number of bright rice-grain-like spot called granule and the surrounding dark lane called intergranular lane, which is a visible manifestation of convection. A simple scenario of the granulation is as follows. Hot gas parcel rises to the surface owing to an upward buoyant force and forms a bright granule. The parcel decreases its temperature through the radiation emitted to the space and its density increases to satisfy the pressure balance with the surrounding. The resulting negative buoyant force works on the parcel to return back into the subsurface, forming a dark intergranular lane. The enormous amount of the kinetic energy deposited in the granulation is responsible for various kinds of astrophysical phenomena, e.g., heating the outer atmospheres (the chromosphere and the corona). To disentangle such granulation-driven phenomena, an essential step is to understand the three-dimensional convective structure by improving our current understanding, such as the above-mentioned simple scenario. Unfortunately, our current observational access is severely limited and is far from that objective, leaving open questions related to vertical and horizontal flows in the granula- tion, respectively. The first issue is several discrepancies in the vertical flows derived from the observation and numerical simulation. Past observational studies reported a typical magnitude relation, e.g., stronger upflow and weaker downflow, with typical amplitude of ≈ 1 km/s.
    [Show full text]
  • Events in the Heliosphere Fjjtuuo- If During the Present Sunspot Cycle S
    A Simulation Study of Two Major "Events in the Heliosphere fJjtUUO- if During the Present Sunspot Cycle S.-I. Akasofu1, W. Fillius2, Wei Sun1*3, C. Fry1 and M. Dryer4 J-Geophysicai l Institute and Department of Space Physics and Atmospheric Sciences. University of Alaska-Fairbanks Fairbanks, Alaska 99701 ^University of California, San Diego La Jplla, California 92093 •> On leave from Institute of Geophysics * Academia Sinica . Beijing, China 4Space Environment Laboratory, NOAA Boulder, Colorado 80303 Abstract The two major disturbances in the heliosphere during the present sunspot cycle, the event of June - August, 1982 and the event of April - June, 1978, are simulated by the method developed by Hakamada and Akasofu (1982). Specifically, we attempt to simulate effects of six major flares from three active regions in June and July, 1982 and April and May, 1978. A comparison, of the results with the solar wind observations at Pioneer 12 (~ 0.8 au), • - • -• ISEE-3 (•* 1 au), Pioneer 11 (~ 7-13 au) and Pioneer 10 (~ 16-28 au) suggests that some major flares occurred behind the disk of the sun during the two periods. Our method provides qualitatively some information as to how such a series of intense solar flares can greatly disturb both the inner and outer heliospheres. A long lasting effect on cosmic rays is discussed in conjunction with the disturbed heliosphere. fNaS&-CB-1769«3) A SIHDLallCB S10DY OF THO N86-29756 MiJOB EVENTS IN TEE HELIOSPBEEE DDBING THE PRESENT SOHSP01 CYCLE (Alaska Oniv. Fairbanks.) 48 p CSCL 03B Dncla. £v 1. Introduction The months of June and July, 1982 and of April and May, 1978 were two of the* most active periods of the sun during the present solar cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sun's Dynamic Atmosphere
    Lecture 16 The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Jiong Qiu, MSU Physics Department Guiding Questions 1. What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere cool off farther away from the Sun’s center? 2. What intrinsic properties of the Sun are reflected in the photospheric observations of limb darkening and granulation? 3. What are major observational signatures in the dynamic chromosphere? 4. What might cause the heating of the upper atmosphere? Can Sound waves heat the upper atmosphere of the Sun? 5. Where does the solar wind come from? 15.1 Introduction The Sun’s atmosphere is composed of three major layers, the photosphere, chromosphere, and corona. The different layers have different temperatures, densities, and distinctive features, and are observed at different wavelengths. Structure of the Sun 15.2 Photosphere The photosphere is the thin (~500 km) bottom layer in the Sun’s atmosphere, where the atmosphere is optically thin, so that photons make their way out and travel unimpeded. Ex.1: the mean free path of photons in the photosphere and the radiative zone. The photosphere is seen in visible light continuum (so- called white light). Observable features on the photosphere include: • Limb darkening: from the disk center to the limb, the brightness fades. • Sun spots: dark areas of magnetic field concentration in low-mid latitudes. • Granulation: convection cells appearing as light patches divided by dark boundaries. Q: does the full moon exhibit limb darkening? Limb Darkening: limb darkening phenomenon indicates that temperature decreases with altitude in the photosphere. Modeling the limb darkening profile tells us the structure of the stellar atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • WENDELSTEIN Solar Observatory
    WENDELSTEIN Solar Observatory Daily drawings of solar features for the years 1947-1987 are available. These lovely images give a composite picture of various solar phenomena, including the solar coronal intensity, the bright Calcium plages, and the filaments and prominences, as well as sunspots. Many stations contributed data to this effort. For example, during the period April-June 1969, stations contributing Hydrogen-alpha images included Anacapri, Athens, Burbank, Catania, Freiburg, Haleakala, Kodaikanal, Sacramento Peak, Teheran, Tonantzintla, and Wendelstein. Those contributing Calcium K3 line images include Anacapri, Arcetri, Catania, Kodaikanal, Manila, Rome, and Wendelstein. Those contributing solar corona 530.3 nm data include Mt. Norikura, Pic du Midi, Sacramento Peak, and Wendelstein. North is at the top. East is on the left. A Stonyhurst disk with the correct Bo angle is used. The times of the different observations are indicated on the left side. Solar flare events are also listed, including begin and end times and position. Times that are underlined are certain. Times without underlines are uncertain. Coronal intensities are marked in numerical form every five degrees around the solar disk. On the disk’s edge, prominences appear in red. On the disk, the filaments are drawn in black, the calcium plage borders are drawn in blue, sunspots are in black, and something (?) is drawn in green. The sunspot Zurich classifications A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and J are indicated. To the right of the drawing are listed the positions and Zurich class of sunspots. .
    [Show full text]
  • ESS 7 Lectures 3, 4,And 5 October 1, 3, and 6, 2008 The
    ESSESS 77 LecturesLectures 3,3, 4,and4,and 55 OctoberOctober 1,1, 3,3, andand 6,6, 20082008 TheThe SunSun One of 100 Billion Stars in Our Galaxy Looking at the Sun • The north and south poles are at opposite ends of the rotation axis. • Because of the 7° tilt of the axis we are able to see the north pole for half a year and the south pole for the other half. • West and east are reversed relative to terrestrial maps. When you view the Sun from the northern hemisphere of the Earth you must look south to see the Sun and west is to your right as in this picture. • The image was taken in Hα. The bright area near central meridian is an active region. The dark line is a filament Electromagnetic Radiation • There is a relationship between a wave’s frequency, wavelength and velocity. V=λf. • High frequency radiation has more energy than low frequency radiation. E=hf where h is the Planck -34 -1 constant=6.6261X10 Js • Age = 4.5 x 109 years • Mass = 1.99 x 1030 kg. • Radius = 696,000 km ( = 696 Mm) • Mean density = 1.4 x 103 kg m-3 ( = 1.4 g cm-3) • Mean distance from Earth (1 AU) = 150 x 106 km ( = 215 solar radii) • Surface gravity = 274 m s-2 • Escape velocity at surface = 618 km s-1 • Radiation emitted (luminosity) = 3.86 x 1026 W • Equatorial rotation period = 27 days (varies with latitude) • Mass loss rate = 109 kg s-1 • Effective black body temperature = 5785 K • Inclination of Sun's equator to plane of Earth's orbit = 7° • Composition: 90% H, 10% He, 0.1% other elements (C, N, 0,...) 31 December 2005 BLACK BODY RADIATION CURVE AT DIFFERENT
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1707.00411V1
    Solar Physics DOI: 10.1007/•••••-•••-•••-••••-• Long-term Variations in the Intensity of Plages and Networks as Observed in Kodaikanal Ca-K Digitized Data Muthu Priyal1 · Jagdev Singh2 · Ravindra B2 · Rathina S. K3 c Springer •••• Abstract In our previous article (Priyal et al., Solar Phys., 289, 127) we have discussed the details of observations and methodology adopted to analyze the Ca-K spectroheliograms obtained at Kodaikanal Observatory (KO) to study the variation of Ca-K plage areas, enhanced network (EN) and active network (AN) for the three solar cycles, namely 19, 20, and 21. Now, we have derived the areas of chromospheric features using KO Ca-K spectroheliograms to study the long term variations of solar cycles between 14 and 21. The comparison of the derived plage areas from the data obtained at KO observatory for the period 1906 – 1985 with that of MWO, NSO for the period 1965 – 2002, earlier measurements made by Tlatov, Pevtsov, and Singh (2009, Solar Phys., 255, 239) for KO data and the SIDC sunspot numbers shows a good correlation. Uniformity of the data obtained with the same instrument remaining with the same specifications provided a unique opportunity to study long term intensity variations in plages and network regions. Therefore, we have investigated the variation of intensity contrast of these features with time at a temporal resolution of 6-months assum- ing the quiet background chromosphere remains unchanged during the period of 1906 – 2005 and found that average intensity of AN, representing the changes in small scale activity over solar surface, varies with solar cycle being less during the minimum phase.
    [Show full text]
  • 1988Apj. . .330. .474P the Astrophysical Journal, 330:474-479
    .474P The Astrophysical Journal, 330:474-479,1988 July 1 © 1988. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. .330. 1988ApJ. NANOFLARES AND THE SOLAR X-RAY CORONA1 E. N. Parker Enrico Fermi Institute and Departments of Physics and Astronomy, University of Chicago Received 1987 October 12; accepted 1987 December 29 ABSTRACT Observations of the Sun with high time and spatial resolution in UV and X-rays show that the emission from small isolated magnetic bipoles is intermittent and impulsive, while the steadier emission from larger bipoles appears as the sum of many individual impulses. We refer to the basic unit of impulsive energy release as a nanoflare. The observations suggest, then, that the active X-ray corona of the Sun is to be understood as a swarm of nanoflares. This interpretation suggests that the X-ray corona is created by the dissipation at the many tangential dis- continuities arising spontaneously in the bipolar fields of the active regions of the Sun as a consequence of random continuous motion of the footpoints of the field in the photospheric convection. The quantitative characteristics of the process are inferred from the observed coronal heat input. Subject headings: hydromagnetics — Sun: corona — Sun: flares I. INTRODUCTION corona. Indeed, it is just that disinclination that allows them to The X-ray corona of the Sun is composed of tenuous wisps penetrate the chromosphere and transition region to reach the of hot gas enclosed in strong (102 G) bipolar magnetic fields. corona. Various ideas have been proposed to facilitate dissi- The high temperature (2-3 x 106 K) of the gas is maintained pation (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are 'Faculae'?
    New Solar Physics with Solar-B Mission ASP Conference Series, Vol. 369, 2007 K. Shibata, S. Nagata, and T. Sakurai What are ‘Faculae’? Thomas E. Berger, Alan M. Title, Theodore D. Tarbell Lockheed Martin Solar and Astophysics Laboratory, Bldg. 252, 3251 Hanover St., Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA Luc Rouppe van der Voort Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, Norway Mats G. L¨ofdahl, G¨oran B. Scharmer Institute for Solar Physics of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, AlbaNova University Center, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden Abstract. We present very high resolution filtergram and magnetogram ob- servations of solar faculae taken at the Swedish 1-meter Solar Telescope (SST) on La Palma. Three datasets with average line-of-sight angles of 16, 34, and 53 degrees are analyzed. The average radial extent of faculae is at least 400 km. In addition we find that contrast versus magnetic flux density is nearly constant for faculae at a given disk position. These facts and the high resolution images and movies reveal that faculae are not the interiors of small flux tubes - they are granules seen through the transparency caused by groups of magnetic ele- ments or micropores “in front of” the granules. Previous results which show a strong dependency of facular contrast on magnetic flux density were caused by bin-averaging of lower resolution data leading to a mixture of the signal from bright facular walls and the associated intergranular lanes and micropores. The findings are relevant to studies of total solar irradiance (TSI) that use facular contrast as a function of disk position and magnetic field in order to model the increase in TSI with increasing sunspot activity.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do We See on the Face of the Sun? Lecture 3: the Solar Atmosphere the Sun’S Atmosphere
    What do we see on the face of the Sun? Lecture 3: The solar atmosphere The Sun’s atmosphere Solar atmosphere is generally subdivided into multiple layers. From bottom to top: photosphere, chromosphere, transition region, corona, heliosphere In its simplest form it is modelled as a single component, plane-parallel atmosphere Density drops exponentially: (for isothermal atmosphere). T=6000K Hρ≈ 100km Density of Sun’s atmosphere is rather low – Mass of the solar atmosphere ≈ mass of the Indian ocean (≈ mass of the photosphere) – Mass of the chromosphere ≈ mass of the Earth’s atmosphere Stratification of average quiet solar atmosphere: 1-D model Typical values of physical parameters Temperature Number Pressure K Density dyne/cm2 cm-3 Photosphere 4000 - 6000 1015 – 1017 103 – 105 Chromosphere 6000 – 50000 1011 – 1015 10-1 – 103 Transition 50000-106 109 – 1011 0.1 region Corona 106 – 5 106 107 – 109 <0.1 How good is the 1-D approximation? 1-D models reproduce extremely well large parts of the spectrum obtained at low spatial resolution However, high resolution images of the Sun at basically all wavelengths show that its atmosphere has a complex structure Therefore: 1-D models may well describe averaged quantities relatively well, although they probably do not describe any particular part of the real Sun The following images illustrate inhomogeneity of the Sun and how the structures change with the wavelength and source of radiation Photosphere Lower chromosphere Upper chromosphere Corona Cartoon of quiet Sun atmosphere Photosphere The photosphere Photosphere extends between solar surface and temperature minimum (400-600 km) It is the source of most of the solar radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Signatures of Nanoflare Activity. I. Monte Carlo Simulations and Parameter Space Exploration
    Statistical Signatures of Nanoflare Activity. I. Monte Carlo Simulations and Parameter Space Exploration Jess, D., Dillon, C., Kirk, M., Reale, F., Mathioudakis, M., Grant, S., Christian, D., Keys, P., Sayamanthula, K., & Houston, S. (2019). Statistical Signatures of Nanoflare Activity. I. Monte Carlo Simulations and Parameter Space Exploration. The Astrophysical Journal, 871, [133]. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaf8ae Published in: The Astrophysical Journal Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2018 American Astronomical Society. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:04. Oct. 2021 DRAFT VERSION DECEMBER 15, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Statistical Signatures of Nanoflare Activity. I. Monte Carlo Simulations and Parameter Space Exploration D.
    [Show full text]