Bramley and Stanningley Ward Health profile overview for Bramley and Stanningley ward Population: 24,925 Bramley and Stanningley ward has a GP registered Comparison of ward Leeds age structures July 2018. population of 24,925 with the majority of the ward Mid range Most deprived 5th Least deprived 5th population living in the mid range of deprivation. In Leeds terms the ward is ranked near the top of the 100-104 Males: 12,307 Females: 12,618 Leeds range by deprivation score . 90-94 80-84 The age profile of this ward is similar to Leeds, but 70-74 with slightly fewer young adults. 60-64 50-54 This profile presents a high level summary of health 40-44 related data sets for the Bramley and Stanningley 30-34 ward. 20-24 10-14 All wards are ranked to display variation across Leeds 0-4 and this one is outlined in red. 6% 3% 0% 3% 6% Leeds overall is shown as a horizontal black line, Deprived Deprivation in this ward Leeds** (or the most deprived fifth**) is an orange dashed Proportions of this population within each deprivation 'quintile' horizontal. The MSOAs that make up this ward are overlaid or fifth of Leeds* (Leeds therefore has equal proportions of 20%) as red circles and often range widely. July 2018. 42% Most of the data is provided for the new wards as 33% redesigned in 2018, however 'obese smokers', and 'child 25% obesity' are for the previous wards and the best match is used in these cases. *Most deprived fifth, or quintile of 0% 0% Leeds - divides Leeds into five areas from most to least Most Least deprived. **Deprived Leeds: areas of Leeds within the 10% deprived deprived fifth most deprived in England. fifth** GP recorded ethnicity, top 5 in ward % Ward % Leeds All wards by deprivation White British 87.3% 70% Wards are scored taking into account the numbers of people and the levels of deprivation where they live, the higher the score Other White Background 6.1% 10% the more deprived the ward population. Black African 1.5% 3% Gipton and Harehills Other Ethnic Background 1.2% 2% Burmantofts and Richmond Hill Hunslet and Riverside Indian or British Indian 0.5% 3% Killingbeck and Seacroft Middleton Park (July 2018, does not contain unknowns, blanks etc) Armley Beeston and Holbeck % Ward % Leeds Chapel Allerton Pupil ethnicity, top 5 in ward Ward Bramley and Stanningley Farnley and Wortley White British 3,313 82% 65% Kirkstall Little London and Woodhouse Any other white background 200 5% 5% Temple Newsam Cross Gates and Whinmoor Black African 106 3% 5% Morley South Pudsey White and Black Caribbean 76 2% 2% Headingley and Hyde Park Rothwell Any other mixed background 66 2% 2% Weetwood Ardsley and Robin Hood Kippax and Methley Morley North Pupil language, top 5 in ward Ward % Ward % Leeds Roundhay Otley and Yeadon English 3,682 91% 79% Calverley and Farsley Alwoodley Polish 88 2% 2% Moortown Garforth and Swillington Other than English 84 2% 1% Horsforth Guiseley and Rawdon Portuguese 29 1% 1% Adel and Wharfedale Wetherby Russian 14 0% 0% Harewood (Pupil data from January 2018 School Census) 0 20 40 60 Health and Wellbeing profile 30/11/18 Page 1 of 4 Bramley and Stanningley Ward Child obesity - reception classes and year 6 classes Rates of children who are overweight or obese as provided by the National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP). The data shows children by ward of residence as a proportion of all children in the ward. The wards are ranked in descending order of deprivation and this ward is outlined in red. Reception Year 6 40% 40% 35% 35% Overweight 30% 30% 25% 25% Very overweight 20% 20% 15% 15% 10% 10% This ward 5% 5% 0% 0% Because the wards are ranked by deprivation it is possible to see a fall in rates from left to right - the least deprived wards tend to have lower rates of child deprivation. Looked after children Progress8 180 Beeston, Cottingley and Middleton 160 Garforth 140 Leodis 120 Rothwell 100 Morley 2Gether 80 Count Headingley - Kirkstall 60 Brigshaw 40 Horsforth 20 Otley/Pool/Bramhope 0 Farnley Templenewsam Halton Number of looked after children in wards from 2016-17. Aireborough ESNW Those living within the most deprived 5th of Leeds* are Bramley shown in orange. 14 of the 641 looked after children who EPOS are resident inside the most deprived 5th of Leeds are Inner East within this ward. ARM Seacroft Manston The wards are shown ranked by deprivation and despite Pudsey variations in population sizes the general picture shows Lantern Learning Trust larger counts in more deprived areas. J.E.S.S ACES Job seekers allowance -0.8 -0.5 -0.3 0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1,000 Score 1 to 13 weeks 800 13 to 52 weeks Progress8 scores for Leeds Childrens Clusters in 52+ weeks 600 descending order (2016-17). Those that overlap significantly with this Ward are highlighted. Count 400 200 A School Cluster’s Progress8 score is usually between -1 and +1. A score of +1 means that pupils 0 attending schools in that cluster achieve one grade Counts of adults receiving Job Seekers Allowance in August higher in each qualification than other similar 2018. pupils nationally. A score of -1 means they achieve one grade lower. The wards are ranked by levels of deprivation and despite variations in population size and structure, there is a clear reduction in numbers as deprivation falls. Health and Wellbeing profile 30/11/18 Page 2 of 4 Bramley and Stanningley Ward GP data. Quarterly data collection, July 2018 (DSR per 100,000) These charts show all 33 wards in rank order by directly standardised rate (DSR). DSR removes the effect that differing age structures have on data, and allow comparison of 'young' and 'old' areas. GP data can only reflect those patients who visit their doctor. Certain groups within the population are known to present late, or not at all, therefore it is important to remember that GP data is not the whole of the picture. This data includes all Leeds GP registered patients who live within the ward. Obesity here is the rate within the population who have a recorded BMI. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 10,000 Asthma (under 16s) 5,000 CHD 8,000 4,000 6,000 Ward 6,400 3,000 Ward 4,226 4,000 2,000 Leeds 6,286 Leeds 3,791 2,000 1,000 Deprived fifth * 6,207 Deprived fifth 4,661 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 35,000 30,000 Adult obesity (BMI>30) 4,000 Cancer 25,000 3,000 20,000 Ward 28,245 Ward 3,949 15,000 2,000 10,000 Leeds 23,696 Leeds 4,032 1,000 5,000 Deprived fifth 27,868 Deprived fifth 3,630 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 12,000 5,000 COPD 10,000 Diabetes 4,000 8,000 3,000 Ward 3,921 6,000 Ward 6,873 2,000 4,000 Leeds 2,591 Leeds 6,225 1,000 2,000 Deprived fifth 4,561 Deprived fifth 9,150 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 30,000 3,000 25,000 Common mental health issues 2,500 Severe mental health issues 20,000 2,000 (18+) 15,000 Ward 24,780 1,500 Ward 1,721 10,000 1,000 Leeds 22,184 Leeds 1,309 5,000 500 Deprived fifth 21,898 Deprived fifth 1,943 0 0 40,000 0 20 40 60 80 100 35,000 Smoking If the ranked wards are significantly above or below 30,000 the Leeds rate then they are coloured red or green (16+) 25,000 accordingly, otherwise they are shown as white to 20,000 Ward 23,821 15,000 indicate they are not significantly different to 10,000 Leeds 18,319 Leeds. 5,000 Deprived fifth 27,516 0 Obese smokers (adults for whom both records were updated within 12 months) 350 Women Men These charts show the number of 300 obese smokers in this ward, by gender 250 and deprivation levels. Patients living in the most 200 Most deprived fifth deprived fifth of Leeds* are shown in orange. Count 150 Mid ranges There have always been large numbers in 100 more deprived areas. Women (who are more likely 50 Least deprived fifth to be clinically obese) outnumber men in this 0 group. Health and Wellbeing profile 30/11/18 Page 3 of 4 Bramley and Stanningley Ward Life expectancy at birth, 2014-16 ranked wards 0 20 40 60 80 100 (years) Males Females 0 20 40 60 80 100 90y 90y Ward 78.2 83.0 80y 80y Leeds resident 79.1 82.7 70y 70y Deprived Leeds** 74.4 79.0 60y 60y Male Female Life expectancy at birth, 2014-16. Ranked by deprivation 90y Most deprived Least dep. Most deprived Least dep. 90y The relationship between deprivation and life expectancy is well established and can be seen clearly here. The most 80y 80y deprived wards are shown first, deprivation falls from left 70y 70y to right. 60y 60y Wards are ranked by deprivation scores calculated using mid 2007 Male Female population locations and IMD 2015 scores. All cause mortality - under 75s, 2012-16 ranked wards 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 (DSR per 100,000) All Males Females 1000 1000 800 800 Ward 470 543 397 600 600 Highest MSOAs in ward 620 675 570 400 400 Lowest MSOAs in ward 345 368 252 200 200 Leeds resident 356 427 286 0 0 All Male Female Deprived fifth 562 668 449 DSR - Directly Standardised Rate removes the effect that age structures have on data, allows comparison of 'young' and 'old' areas Cancer mortality - under 75s, 2012-16 ranked wards (DSR per 100,000) All Males Females 300 300 250 250 Ward 191 212 172 200 200 Highest MSOAs in area 232 277 204 150 150 100 100 Lowest MSOAs in area 136 153 117 50 50 Leeds resident 147 164 133 0 0 All Male Female Deprived fifth 203 225 181 Circulatory disease mortality - under 75s, 2012-16 ranked wards (DSR per 100,000) All Males Females 250 250 200 200 Ward 115 156 74 150 150 Highest MSOAs in area 151 221 96 100 100 Lowest MSOAs in area 56 55 56 50 50 Leeds resident 82 113 52 0 0 All Male Female Deprived fifth 141 188 94 Respiratory disease mortality - under 75s, 2012-16 ranked wards (DSR per 100,000) All Males Females 140 140 120 120 Ward 49 45 53 100 100 80 80 Highest MSOAs in area 95 95 94 60 60 Lowest MSOAs in area 22 21 15 40 40 20 20 Leeds resident 32 35 29 0 0 All Male Female Deprived fifth 64 73 55 **Deprived Leeds: areas of Leeds within the 10% most deprived in England, using the Index of Multiple Deprivation.