DOCSLIB.ORG

No. 18-956 Petitioner, V. Respondent. on Writ of Certiorari to the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
No. 18-956 Petitioner, V. Respondent. on Writ of Certiorari to the U.S No. 18-956 IN THE GOOGLE LLC, Petitioner, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit JOINT APPENDIX VOLUME 2 PAGES 342-725 Thomas C. Goldstein E. Joshua Rosenkranz GOLDSTEIN & RUSSELL, P.C. ORRICK, HERRINGTON & 7475 Wisconsin Ave. SUTCLIFFE LLP Suite 850 51 West 52nd Street Bethesda, MD 20814 New York, NY 10019 (202) 362-0636 (212) 506-5000 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel of Record for Petitioner Counsel of Record for Respondent PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI FILED JAN. 24, 2019 CERTIORARI GRANTED NOV. 15, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Docket Excerpts: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 13-1021 .................................. 1 Docket Excerpts: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 17-1118 .................................. 3 Docket Excerpts: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:10-cv-03561 .................................................... 5 Transcript of 2012 Jury Trial Proceedings (excerpts) ............................................................... 30 Final Charge to the Jury (Phase One) and Special Verdict Form, Dist. Ct. Docs. 1018 & 1018-1 (Apr. 30, 2012) ....................................... 72 Special Verdict Form, Dist. Ct. Doc. 1089 (May 7, 2012) ......................................................... 95 Trial Exhibit 7803, Deposition Clips of Henrik Stahl Played by Video During Trial (Jan. 14, 2016) (excerpts) ...................................... 98 Order re 62 Classes and Interfaces, Dist. Ct. Doc. 1839 (May 6, 2016) ...................................... 103 Joint Filing Regarding Agreed Statement Regarding Copyrightability (ECF No. 1788), Dist. Ct. Doc. 1846 (May 7, 2016) ....................... 105 Transcript of 2016 Jury Trial Proceedings (excerpts) ............................................................. 109 Final Charge to the Jury (Phase One) and Special Verdict Form, Dist. Ct. Doc. 1981 (May 26, 2016) .................................................... 267 ii Special Verdict Form, Dist. Ct. Doc. 1982 (May 26, 2016) .................................................... 295 Final Judgment, Dist. Ct. Doc. 1989 (June 8, 2016) ...................................................... 296 Transcript of 2012 Jury Trial Proceedings (further excerpts) ................................................ 297 Joint Response to Court’s Request for Chart of Elements in Accused Packages, Dist. Ct. Doc. 1124 (May 12, 2012) .................................... 333 Trial Exhibit 1072, Accused API Packages and Files in Android ................................................... 339 VOLUME 2 Transcript of 2016 Jury Trial Proceedings (further excerpts) ................................................ 342 Order in Limine re Oracle’s Motion re Dr. Roderic Cattell, Dist. Ct. Doc. 1879 (May 12, 2016) ..................................................... 470 Trial Exhibit 1, Google PowerPoint Presentation Titled Android GPS: Key Strategic Decisions Around Open Source (dated July 26, 2005) (excerpts) ............................................................. 472 Trial Exhibit 7, Emails re Sun Meeting (dated Oct. 11, 2005) ........................................... 475 Trial Exhibit 10, Email re Context for Discussion re Alternatives to Java (dated Aug. 6, 2010) ..... 478 Trial Exhibit 13, Emails re New Java World (dated Jan. 3, 2006) ............................................. 480 Trial Exhibit 14, Email re Sun Microsystems (dated Jan. 13, 2006) ........................................... 484 iii Trial Exhibit 15, Emails re EMG Deal Review Agenda and Slides - Feb 6, 2006 (dated Feb. 5, 2006) (excerpts) ............................ 486 Trial Exhibit 18, Emails re The open J2ME project (dated Mar. 24, 2006) (excerpts) ............. 492 Trial Exhibit 29, Emails re Android Presence at JavaOne (dated Mar. 24, 2008) ...................... 494 Trial Exhibit 31, Google PowerPoint presentation: “Android 101: An introduction to Android and Android Partnerships” (dated Dec. 2008) (excerpts) ............................................................. 497 Trial Exhibit 134, Email re Urgent stats needed (Jan. 31, 2006) (excerpts) .................................... 499 Trial Exhibit 158, Email re Materials on Google Open Handset OS, attaching Android PowerPoint presentation: “Android: Open Handset Platform” (dated Sept. 28, 2006) (excerpts) ............................................................. 502 Trial Exhibit 205, Emails re Potential Sun Google partnership in the Mobile Java and OS Space (dated Feb. 8, 2006) ............................ 504 Trial Exhibit 215, Email re Java Class Libraries (dated June 1, 2006) ............................................ 506 Trial Exhibit 370, Internal Google document: “Mobile Strategy Summit - Notes” (dated Nov. 4-5, 2010) (excerpts) ........................ 507 Trial Exhibit 610.1, Java 2 Platform Standard Edition Development Kit 5.0 Specification (license.html) (dated Aug. 25, 2004) ................... 511 iv Trial Exhibit 877, Joshua Bloch: Bumper-Sticker API design, http://www.infoq.com/articles/API- Design-Joshua-Bloch (dated Sept. 22, 2008) ...... 517 Trial Exhibit 951, Google Inc. GOOG Q3 2010 Earnings Call Transcript (dated Oct. 14, 2010) (excerpts) ............................................................. 523 Trial Exhibit 1056, Email re no doubt you saw… (dated Mar. 26, 2008) .......................................... 532 Trial Exhibit 2052, PowerPoint “Java in Wireless Business Review” (dated Mar. 16, 2009) (excerpts) ............................................................. 535 Trial Exhibit 2368, Email re Java (dated Nov. 7, 2007) ............................................ 538 Trial Exhibit 3211, Google’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2004 (dated Mar. 30, 2005) (excerpts) ......................... 539 Trial Exhibit 5046, Email re and what if we accepted the damn FOU restriction? (dated Apr. 17, 2008) ........................................... 553 Trial Exhibit 5048, Email re java open source (dated Nov. 28, 2006) .......................................... 557 Trial Exhibit 5114, Email re Latest material for CMCC’s VP Sha visit Wed morning (dated Mar. 28, 2007) (excerpts) .................................... 558 Trial Exhibit 5121, Wayback Machine: Google Web APIs (beta) - Terms and Conditions for Google Web API Service (dated May 14, 2005) ...................................................... 561 v Trial Exhibit 5250, Wayback Machine: Google AdWords API beta: Terms & Conditions (dated Jan. 25, 2005) ........................ 567 Trial Exhibit 5322, Email re Android announce at 3GSM (dated Oct. 23, 2006) (excerpts) .......... 584 Trial Exhibit 5562, Email re some materials from today (dated Mar. 27, 2007) (excerpts) ...... 589 Trial Exhibit 5585, Email and attachment re Docs for LG (dated July 7, 2006) (excerpts) ....... 594 Trial Exhibit 5586, Email re Draft deck for AT&T meeting (dated Sept. 11, 2008) (excerpts) ............................................................. 598 Trial Exhibit 6053, cnbc.com - Dauble “CNBC’s Jim Cramer Interviews Google Inc. Chairman & CEO Eric Schmidt” (dated Aug. 15, 2008) (excerpts) ............................................................. 602 Trial Exhibit 7326, JavaOne Tim Ellison presentation “Apache Harmony: An Open Innovation” (2010) (excerpts) .............................. 611 Trial Exhibit 7787, Deposition Clips of Larry Ellison Played by Video During Trial (Aug. 12, 2011) (excerpts) ................................... 613 Trial Exhibit 9201, Email re Oracle buys Sun (dated Apr. 20, 2009) ........................................... 616 Trial Exhibit 9214, Deposition Designations of Anwar Ghuloum Played by Video During Trial (Dec. 9, 2015) (excerpts) ............................. 627 vi Trial Exhibit 9223, Declarations That Are Subject to a Technical Constraint Imposed by the Java Programming Language Specification (3d ed.) (dated May 17, 2016) ....... 631 Oracle’s Brief Regarding Copyright Issues, Dist. Ct. Doc. 853 (Apr. 3, 2012) (excerpts) ........ 640 Transcript of 2016 Jury Trial Proceedings (further excerpts) ................................................ 641 Trial Exhibit 1026, Sun Community Source License between Sun Microsystems and Danger, Inc. (dated Aug. 26, 2003) (excerpts) .... 678 Trial Exhibit 7787, Deposition Clips of Larry Ellison Played by Video During Trial (Aug. 12, 2011) (further excerpts)....................... 693 Trial Exhibit 7788, Deposition Clips of Donald Smith Played by Video During Trial (Nov. 20, 2015) (excerpts).................................... 697 Trial Exhibit 1045, The Apache Software Foundation, Blogging in Action (dated Dec. 9, 2010) ........................................................ 703 Transcript of 2016 Jury Trial Proceedings (further excerpts) ................................................ 706 vii The following decisions have been omitted in printing the joint appendix because they appear in the appendix to the petition for certiorari, beginning on the following pages: Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Mar. 27, 2018) ................ 1a Order Denying Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for a New Trial of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Sept. 27, 2016) .................................................... 56a Order Denying Rule 50 Motions of the United States District Court for the Northern
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Webroot Brightcloud® SDK for C and C++ Sdks Apache License 2.0
    Webroot BrightCloud® SDK For C and C++ SDKs Apache License 2.0 • Apache Portable Runtime Utilities (APR-util) Copyright © 2008-2018, The Apache Software Foundation • Apache Portable Runtime Utilities 1.2.12 (APR-util) Copyright © 2008-2018, The Apache Software Foundation • X Delta 3.0.3 Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 [email protected] Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004 http://www.apache.org/licenses/ TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION 1. Definitions. “License” shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. “Licensor” shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by the copyright owner that is granting the License. “Legal Entity” shall mean the union of the acting entity and all other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, “control” means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity. “You” (or “Your”) shall mean an individual or Legal Entity exercising permissions granted by this License. “Source” form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, including but not limited to software source code, documentation source, and configuration files. “Object” form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical transformation or translation of a Source form, including but not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, and conversions to other media types.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Volume 13 (PDF)
    Volume 13, Summer 2019 Copyright Ó 2019 Assistive Technology Industry Association ISSN 1938-7261 Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits | i The Role of Research in Influencing Assistive Technology Products, Policy, and Practice Volume 13, Summer 2019 Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits The Role of Research in Influencing Assistive Technology Products, Policy, and Practice Volume 13, Summer 2019 Editor in Chief Focused Issue Editor Jennifer L. Flagg Kathleen M. Murphy Center on KT4TT, University oF BuFFalo American Institutes For Research Publication Managers Associate Editors Victoria A. Holder Kate Herndon Tools For LiFe, Georgia Institute oF Technology American Printing House For the Blind Elizabeth A. Persaud Carolyn P. Phillips Tools For LiFe, Georgia Insitute oF Technology Tools For LiFe, Georgia Institute oF Technology Caroline Van Howe Copy Editor Assistive Technology Industry Association Beverly Nau Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits (ATOB) is a collaborative peer-reviewed publication of the Assistive Technology Industry Association (ATIA). Editing policies oF this issue are based on the Publication Manual oF the American Psychological Association (6th edition) and may be Found online at www.atia.org/atob/editorialpolicy. The content does not reflect the position or policy of ATIA and no official endorsement should be inferred. Editorial Board Members and Managing Editors David Banes Beth Poss Managing Director, David Banes Access and Administrator, Montgomery County Schools, Inclusion Services Maryland Russell T. Cross Ben SatterField Director of Clinical Operations, Prentke Romich Research Consultant, Center for AT Company Excellence, Tools For LiFe at Georgia Institute oF Technology Anya Evmenova Associate Professor, Division of Special Judith Schoonover Education and disAbility Research, George Occupational Therapist and AT Consultant, Mason University Sterling, Virginia American Occupational Therapy Association, Lori Geist Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing and Deploying IBM Rational HATS® Applications on Apache Geronimo Server
    Testing and Deploying IBM Rational HATS® 8.5 Applications on Apache Geronimo Server 3.1 Royal Cyber Inc. Modernized e-business solutions Testing and Deploying IBM Rational HATS® Applications on Apache Geronimo Server Overview This white paper explains how to run, test and deploy IBM Host Access Transformation Service® (HATS) web application on Apache Geronimo Application server. Part 1 - Introduction In the 'Introduction' part the overview of the White Paper is provided. Basic introduction to the IBM Host Access Transformation Service (HATS) and Apache Geronimo Server are provided in this part. Part 2 - Deploying and Installing Apache Geronimo Server In the 'Deploying and Installing Geronimo Server' part, the entire process of deploying the Geronimo Server is explained. Along with that using IBM HATS projects in the Geronimo Server are also explained Part 3 - Benefits In the 'Benefits' part, the overall benefits of the combination IBM HATS-Apache Geronimo Server are discussed. Testing and Deploying IBM Rational HATS® Applications on Apache Geronimo Server PART 1- INTRODUCTION Application server is a very important component in the overall scheme of the web systems as it provides platform for launching or executing applications. It manages all the involved resources like Hardware, OS, Network, etc. It is not just mere hosting of the application, an application server acts as a stage for the deployment and development of Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs), Web services, etc. In short, Application server interacts between the front end (end users) and system resources at backend. There are various Application servers available in market both paid and unpaid. However, for working with IBM HATS, Apache's Geronimo server is one of the top Application server choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Android (Operating System) 1 Android (Operating System)
    Android (operating system) 1 Android (operating system) Android Home screen displayed by Samsung Nexus S with Google running Android 2.3 "Gingerbread" Company / developer Google Inc., Open Handset Alliance [1] Programmed in C (core), C++ (some third-party libraries), Java (UI) Working state Current [2] Source model Free and open source software (3.0 is currently in closed development) Initial release 21 October 2008 Latest stable release Tablets: [3] 3.0.1 (Honeycomb) Phones: [3] 2.3.3 (Gingerbread) / 24 February 2011 [4] Supported platforms ARM, MIPS, Power, x86 Kernel type Monolithic, modified Linux kernel Default user interface Graphical [5] License Apache 2.0, Linux kernel patches are under GPL v2 Official website [www.android.com www.android.com] Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and key applications.[6] [7] Google Inc. purchased the initial developer of the software, Android Inc., in 2005.[8] Android's mobile operating system is based on a modified version of the Linux kernel. Google and other members of the Open Handset Alliance collaborated on Android's development and release.[9] [10] The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) is tasked with the maintenance and further development of Android.[11] The Android operating system is the world's best-selling Smartphone platform.[12] [13] Android has a large community of developers writing applications ("apps") that extend the functionality of the devices. There are currently over 150,000 apps available for Android.[14] [15] Android Market is the online app store run by Google, though apps can also be downloaded from third-party sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Technique: HTTP the Java Way
    Technique: HTTP the Java way An article from Android in Practice EARLY ACCESS EDITION Charlie Collins, Michael D. Galpin, and Matthias Kaeppler MEAP Release: July 2010 Softbound print: Spring 2011 | 500 pages ISBN: 9781935182924 This article is taken from the book Android in Practice. The authors demonstrate how to send simple HTTP requests to a Web server using Java’s standard HTTP networking facilities. Tweet this button! (instructions here) Get 35% off any version of Android in Practice with the checkout code fcc35. Offer is only valid through www.manning.com. The standard Java class library already has a solution for HTTP messaging. An open-source implementation of these classes is bundled with Android’s class library, which is based on Apache Harmony. It’s simple and bare- bones in its structure and, while it supports features like proxy servers, cookies (to some degree), and SSL, the one thing that it lacks more than anything else is a class interface and component structure that doesn’t leave you bathed in tears. Still, more elaborate HTTP solutions are often wrappers around the standard Java interfaces and, if you don’t need all the abstraction provided, for example, by Apache HttpClient interfaces, the stock Java classes may not only be sufficient, they also perform much better thanks to a much slimmer, more low-level implementation. Problem You must perform simple networking tasks via HTTP (such as downloading a file) and you want to avoid the performance penalty imposed by the higher-level, much larger, and more complex Apache HttpClient implementation. Solution If you ever find yourself in this situation, you probably want to do HTTP conversations through a java.net.HttpURLConnection.
    [Show full text]
  • A Middleware Framework for Application-Aware and User-Specific Energy Optimization in Smart Mobile Devices
    Pervasive and Mobile Computing 20 (2015) 47–63 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pervasive and Mobile Computing journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pmc A middleware framework for application-aware and user-specific energy optimization in smart mobile devices Sudeep Pasricha a,∗, Brad K. Donohoo b, Chris Ohlsen c a Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA b U.S. Department of the Air Force, Roy, UT 84067, UT 84067, USA c Woodward, Inc., Fort Collins, CO 80525, USA article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Mobile battery-operated devices are becoming an essential instrument for business, com- Received 5 August 2014 munication, and social interaction. In addition to the demand for an acceptable level of per- Received in revised form 22 December 2014 formance and a comprehensive set of features, users often desire extended battery lifetime. Accepted 7 January 2015 In fact, limited battery lifetime is one of the biggest obstacles facing the current utility and Available online 14 January 2015 future growth of increasingly sophisticated ``smart'' mobile devices. This paper proposes a novel application-aware and user-interaction aware energy optimization middleware Keywords: framework (AURA) for pervasive mobile devices. AURA optimizes CPU and screen back- Energy optimization Smart mobile systems light energy consumption while maintaining a minimum acceptable level of performance. Pervasive computing The proposed framework employs a novel Bayesian application classifier and management Machine learning strategies based on Markov Decision Processes and Q-Learning to achieve energy savings. Middleware Real-world user evaluation studies on Google Android based HTC Dream and Google Nexus One smartphones running the AURA framework demonstrate promising results, with up to 29% energy savings compared to the baseline device manager, and up to 5×savings over prior work on CPU and backlight energy co-optimization.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Platform System of Medical Documents Protection Through Digital Signatures
    CROSS-PLATFORM SYSTEM OF MEDICAL DOCUMENTS PROTECTION THROUGH DIGITAL SIGNATURES Fernando Guilherme Ferreira Sousa Project/Dissertation developed under supervising of José Magalhães Cruz (PhD) in Glintt - Healthcare Solutions, S.A. 1. Motivation documents, which are then sent to the server and, consequently, validated and stored in the database. Due to the extreme information sensibility in the Subsequent to this process, each time a document is health area, it is really necessary to be absolutely sure opened to be viewed, for example, a check is made of about who performs certain medical transactions. It a possible change to the same document, in order to must have permission and authority to do so, i.e. be ensure that recurrently its integrity. Through really the right person to do this transaction. In areas cryptography-based security methods of public keys, involving health treatments, marking of exams or it is verified if someone tampered the document or even surgeries and new prescriptions, there must be made it invalid in some way. an extremely effective control to verify effectively that all transactions must be properly carried out, Each platform that the doctor use should read his without any type of deception or illegality. digital certificate, which is contained in a Smart Card and is installed on the machine, once inserted in a One of the biggest motivations is that the patient, in suitable card reader. Then, the digital signature is the future, might be aware that there is a control in performed with the certificate’s associated private the preparation of their medical documents. All key, which certificates the medical document.
    [Show full text]
  • A Java Security Scanner for Eclipse
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2005 JeSS – a Java Security Scanner for Eclipse Russell Spitler Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the Databases and Information Systems Commons, Other Computer Engineering Commons, Programming Languages and Compilers Commons, and the Systems Architecture Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Spitler, Russell, "JeSS – a Java Security Scanner for Eclipse" (2005). Honors Theses. Paper 567. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/567 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. JeSS – a Java Security Scanner for Eclipse Russell Spitler Senior Honors Thesis Spring 2005 Colby College Department of Computer Science Advisor: Dale Skrien Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Secure Coding and Java Security 2.1 – Secure Coding 3 2.2 – Java Security 7 Chapter 3 Java Security Holes 3.1 – Don’t depend on initialization 13 3.2 – Make everything final 14 3.3 – Make your code unserializable and undeserializable 16 3.4 – Make your class non-Cloneable 19 3.5 – Don’t rely on
    [Show full text]
  • SUSE® LINUX Enterprise Jeos 11 Novell® Software License Agreement
    NOTICE: This document includes the SUSE Linux Enterprise JeOS 11 Novell Software License Agreement followed by other license agreements. By indicating your acceptance of these terms, including by use, you are agreeing to the terms and conditions of each these agreements. SUSE® LINUX Enterprise JeOS 11 Novell® Software License Agreement PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY. BY INSTALLING OR OTHERWISE USING THE SOFTWARE (INCLUDING ITS COMPONENTS), YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH THESE TERMS, DO NOT DOWNLOAD, INSTALL OR USE THE SOFTWARE. RIGHTS AND LICENSES This Novell Software License Agreement ("Agreement") is a legal agreement between You (an entity or a person) and Novell, Inc. ("Novell"). The software product identified in the title of this Agreement, together with any media and accompanying documentation, is referred to in this Agreement as the "Software." The Software is protected by the copyright laws and treaties of the United States ("U.S.") and other countries and is subject to the terms of this Agreement. Any update or support release to the Software that You may download or receive that is not accompanied by a license agreement expressly superseding this Agreement is Software and governed by this Agreement; You must have a valid license for the version and quantity of the Software being updated or supported in order to install or use any such update or support release. The Software is a modular operating system comprised of numerous components that may be accompanied by separate license terms. The Software is a collective work of Novell; although Novell does not own the copyright to every component of the Software, Novell owns the collective work copyright for the Software.
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge the Design And
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A SMALL TO MEDIUM RESTAURANT BUSINESS WEB APPLICATION A graduate project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science By Edward Gerhardstein May 2011 The graduate project of Edward Gerhardstein is approved: John Noga , Ph.D. Date Robert McIlhenny , Ph.D. Date Jeff Wiegley , Ph.D., Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Table of Contents Signature page ii Abstract vi 1 Overview of Pizza Application 1 2 Open Source Licenses Servers 2 2.1 Open Source License Definition . .2 2.2 Ubuntu . .2 2.3 Apache Tomcat . .2 2.4 MySQL . .4 3 Selected Concepts and Terminologies 6 3.1 Model-View-Controller (MVC) . .6 3.2 JavaScript . .7 3.3 Ajax . .7 3.4 XML . .7 3.5 DTD . .7 3.6 XML Schema . .7 3.7 CSS . .8 4 J2EE Concepts 9 4.1 J2EE Overview . .9 4.2 JavaBean . .9 4.3 Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) . .9 4.4 Other J2EE APIs and Technologies . .9 4.5 Servlets . 10 4.6 JavaServer Pages (JSP) . 11 4.6.1 Scriptlet . 11 5 Apache Struts Framework 13 5.1 Apache Struts Overview . 13 5.2 ActionServlet . 13 5.3 Struts Config . 13 6 Pizza Application Overview 15 6.1 Design Layout . 15 6.2 Workflow . 15 6.3 JSP Page formats - Index.jsp/Templates . 17 6.4 JSP Page Divisions . 18 7 ClockIn/Clockout and Logon Functionality 21 7.1 ClockIn/Clockout Functionality . 21 iii 7.2 Logon Functionality . 21 8 Administrator Functionality 24 8.1 Administrator Functionality Description .
    [Show full text]
  • History and Evolution of the Android OS
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector CHAPTER 1 History and Evolution of the Android OS I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this. —Steve Jobs, Apple Inc. Android, Inc. started with a clear mission by its creators. According to Andy Rubin, one of Android’s founders, Android Inc. was to develop “smarter mobile devices that are more aware of its owner’s location and preferences.” Rubin further stated, “If people are smart, that information starts getting aggregated into consumer products.” The year was 2003 and the location was Palo Alto, California. This was the year Android was born. While Android, Inc. started operations secretly, today the entire world knows about Android. It is no secret that Android is an operating system (OS) for modern day smartphones, tablets, and soon-to-be laptops, but what exactly does that mean? What did Android used to look like? How has it gotten where it is today? All of these questions and more will be answered in this brief chapter. Origins Android first appeared on the technology radar in 2005 when Google, the multibillion- dollar technology company, purchased Android, Inc. At the time, not much was known about Android and what Google intended on doing with it. Information was sparse until 2007, when Google announced the world’s first truly open platform for mobile devices. The First Distribution of Android On November 5, 2007, a press release from the Open Handset Alliance set the stage for the future of the Android platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Unravel Data Systems Version 4.5
    UNRAVEL DATA SYSTEMS VERSION 4.5 Component name Component version name License names jQuery 1.8.2 MIT License Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 Apache License 2.0 Tachyon Project POM 0.8.2 Apache License 2.0 Apache Directory LDAP API Model 1.0.0-M20 Apache License 2.0 apache/incubator-heron 0.16.5.1 Apache License 2.0 Maven Plugin API 3.0.4 Apache License 2.0 ApacheDS Authentication Interceptor 2.0.0-M15 Apache License 2.0 Apache Directory LDAP API Extras ACI 1.0.0-M20 Apache License 2.0 Apache HttpComponents Core 4.3.3 Apache License 2.0 Spark Project Tags 2.0.0-preview Apache License 2.0 Curator Testing 3.3.0 Apache License 2.0 Apache HttpComponents Core 4.4.5 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Apache License 2.0 classworlds 2.4 Apache License 2.0 abego TreeLayout Core 1.0.1 BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License jackson-core 2.8.6 Apache License 2.0 Lucene Join 6.6.1 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons CLI 1.3-cloudera-pre-r1439998 Apache License 2.0 hive-apache 0.5 Apache License 2.0 scala-parser-combinators 1.0.4 BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License com.springsource.javax.xml.bind 2.1.7 Common Development and Distribution License 1.0 SnakeYAML 1.15 Apache License 2.0 JUnit 4.12 Common Public License 1.0 ApacheDS Protocol Kerberos 2.0.0-M12 Apache License 2.0 Apache Groovy 2.4.6 Apache License 2.0 JGraphT - Core 1.2.0 (GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later AND Eclipse Public License 1.0) chill-java 0.5.0 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons Logging 1.2 Apache License 2.0 OpenCensus 0.12.3 Apache License 2.0 ApacheDS Protocol
    [Show full text]