Ocean Circulation at the Last Glacial Maximum: 3 a Combined Modeling and Magnetic Proxy-Based Study
PALEOCEANOGRAPHY, VOL. 22, XXXXXX, doi:10.1029/2006PA001281, 2007 Click Here for Full Article
2 Ocean circulation at the Last Glacial Maximum: 3 A combined modeling and magnetic proxy-based study
1 1 2 4 S. J. Watkins, B. A. Maher, and G. R. Bigg 5 Received 10 February 2006; revised 20 October 2006; accepted 16 November 2006; published XX Month 2007.
6 [1] Formation of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) is an important component of the ocean thermohaline 7 circulation, but debate exists over the ocean circulation state during glacial stages. Some geological and 8 modeling studies suggest decreased NADW and increased formation of Southern Ocean deep water during the 9 Last Glacial Maximum (LGM); others indicate similar, or higher, rates of NADW advection. Here we test three 10 different potential LGM ocean states by comparing the modeled iceberg trajectories each produces with 11 magnetically mapped patterns and sources of LGM ice-rafted debris (IRD). The three LGM states are 12 characterized by vigorous NADW formation; deepwater production in the Southern Ocean; and a third, 13 ‘‘intermediate’’ state, with Southern Ocean deepwater formation but also some North Atlantic intermediate water 14 formation. Cluster analysis of sediment magnetic properties was used to characterize North Atlantic IRD 15 patterns and sources, which match most closely iceberg trajectories arising from some combination of the 16 ‘‘southern sinking’’ and ‘‘intermediate’’ ocean circulation states. The magnetic data indicate two major IRD 17 sources, Fennoscandia and Greenland/Iceland, and one minor source, the St. Lawrence region. The model and 18 magnetic data suggest that the LGM North Atlantic circulation was dominated by a cyclonic central North 19 Atlantic gyre, separated from the North Atlantic Current, which was displaced south of 42N. 21 Citation: Watkins, S. J., B. A. Maher, and G. R. Bigg (2007), Ocean circulation at the Last Glacial Maximum: A combined modeling 22 and magnetic proxy-based study, Paleoceanography, 22, XXXXXX, doi:10.1029/2006PA001281.
24 1. Introduction 1996; Hewitt et al., 2003]. The third state is characterized 47 by production of intermediate depth water (with a more 48 25 [2] Understanding the circulation of the North Atlantic is limited distribution) in the North Atlantic, while the deep 49 26 crucial given the key role the ocean plays in controlling the ocean basins are dominated by water formed in the Southern 50 27 global oceanic and atmospheric circulation through the Ocean [e.g., Boyle and Keigwin, 1987; Sarnthein et al., 51 28 thermohaline circulation (THC) and the transfer of heat 1994, 1995; Beveridge et al., 1995; Seidov and Haupt, 52 29 from the equator to the poles. Evidence, both from ocean 1997; Ganopolski et al., 1998; Shin et al., 2003]. The loca- 53 30 general circulation models and marine sediment studies, tion of formation of intermediate depth water is debated, 54 31 suggests the strength of the THC may have varied through but is suggested to have shifted southward to 50–60N 55 32 time and possibly undergone complete shutdown, altering [e.g., Duplessy et al., 1980; Sarnthein et al., 1995; Seidov et 56 33 global ocean circulation (see, e.g., review of Rahmstorf al., 1996; Seidov and Haupt, 1997]. The strength of this 57 34 [2002] or Seidov et al. [2001]). Much debate currently exists intermediate water formation is also unclear; proxy data 58 35 over the circulation of the North Atlantic during the Last reconstructions and modeling studies suggest anything 59 36 Glacial Maximum (LGM). Three conflicting theories have from very little reduction to a 50% reduction compared to 60 37 emerged from both modeling and geological proxy-based the present day [LeGrand and Wunsch, 1995; Seidov et al., 61 38 studies. The first theory suggests there was very little or no 1996; Seidov and Haupt, 1997; Marchaletal., 2000; 62 39 production of deep water in the North Atlantic, with much Scha¨fer-Neth and Paul, 2000; McManus et al., 2004]. 63 40 greater influence and penetration of deep water formed in [3] One way of testing these three circulation states is 64 41 the Southern Ocean [e.g., Oppo and Fairbanks, 1987; through identification of the spatial distribution of iceberg- 65 42 Michel et al., 1995; Kim et al., 2003; Keigwin, 2004; rafted debris (IRD) in the North Atlantic, the bergs having 66 43 Robinson et al., 2005]. The second circulation state identi- been transported by dominant surface water currents during 67 44 fies production at the LGM of North Atlantic Deep Water the LGM. So far, while there have been studies of IRD 68 45 (NADW) at a similar location and with similar (or possibly associated with past glacial stages [e.g., Ruddiman, 1977; 69 46 stronger) formation rates to the present day [e.g., Yu et al., Fillon et al., 1981; Smythe et al., 1985; Balsam and McCoy, 70 1987; Cremer et al., 1992], relatively few studies of 71 Atlantic-wide IRD patterns have been reported for the 72 1 Centre for Environmental Magnetism and Palaeomagnetism, Lancaster LGM. The most complete study to date of LGM IRD in 73 Environment Centre, Geography Department, Lancaster University, the North Atlantic is provided by Robinson et al. [1995], 74 Lancaster, UK. 2Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. who identified differences between sediment magnetic sus- 75 ceptibility values at the LGM and in the Holocene, in order 76 Copyright 2007 by the American Geophysical Union. to identify regions of increased ice rafting. 77 0883-8305/07/2006PA001281$12.00
XXXXXX 1of20 XXXXXX WATKINS ET AL.: LGM OCEAN CIRCULATION XXXXXX t1.1 Table 1. Contrasting Characteristics of the Ocean Circulation for the Three Model Statesa t1.2 NSS SSS ISS Thermohaline circulation Vigorous formation of NADW (56 Sv), deep water produced in Southern formation of intermediate water in very little southern-sourced deep water Ocean (12 Sv), very weak production North Atlantic (10 Sv) and deep water t1.3 of North Atlantic intermediate water in Southern Ocean (2 Sv) East Greenland Current Southward flowing EGC, northward southward extension of EGC no southward EGC north of 65N; extension of NAC southward extension of EGC south t1.4 of 60N t1.5 North Atlantic Current Strong, easterly NAC weaker, more zonal NAC Weaker, more zonal NAC t1.6 Flow at European coast northeasterly flow along European coast northeasterly flow along European coast Flow toward European coast t1.7 aAbbreviations are NADW, North Atlantic Deep Water; EGC, East Greenland Current; and NAC, North Atlantic Current.
78 [4] Here we extend Robinson et al.’s [1995] study, by from 61 different sites. The total iceberg flux is then scaled 124 79 using two different approaches to identify iceberg trajectories up by relating the calculated annual mass flux from each 125 80 and IRD, and hence dominant ocean circulation, patterns. release site [Bigg and Wadley, 2001] to the flux deriving 126 81 First, we use iceberg trajectory modeling within three from the limited suite of icebergs released at each site. At the 127 82 different modeled LGM ocean circulation states, in order end of each time step, the new position, velocity, dimensions 128 83 to identify the links between surface currents and possible and mass of each iceberg are calculated. If an iceberg 129 84 loci of deep water formation. Second, to reconstruct ocean collides with the coastline, it is removed from the model. 130 85 surface currents, we use a suite of magnetic measurements If, near the coast, the iceberg moves into an area where the 131 86 to characterize magnetically IRD in LGM sediments from water is shallower than its draft, it becomes grounded and 132 87 deep-sea cores spread across the North Atlantic and neigh- continues to melt until it can refloat and move away. 133 88 boring seas, comparing the sediment magnetic signatures [6] Annual mean forcing fields from an atmospheric 134 89 with a range of circum-Atlantic potential sediment source general circulation model (AGCM) and ocean general 135 90 materials [Watkins and Maher, 2003]. On the basis that circulation model (OGCM) are used to drive the iceberg 136 91 iceberg drift and melting reflect ocean surface currents model. Here three LGM circulation states, with very different 137 92 across the North Atlantic at the LGM, and that we can circulation characteristics aiming to represent to some 138 93 identify magnetically the distributions and generalized degree the three different North Atlantic paleoceanographic 139 94 sources of LGM IRD, we can compare the modeled and views of LGM circulation discussed above, were obtained 140 95 our inferred IRD patterns to thence enable identification of using two modeling approaches. The main features of these 141 96 the most probable LGM ocean circulation state. three circulation states are shown in Table 1. In the first 142 approach, LGM AGCM fields from Hall et al. [1996] are 143 97 2. Methods used to drive indirectly an OGCM [Bigg et al., 1998]. The 144 resulting oceanic forcing fields (4 longitude by 3 latitude 145 98 2.1. Iceberg Modeling resolution and 19 vertical levels) are then used as relaxation 146 99 [5] In the modeling approach, an iceberg model is used to constraints in a robust mode model to produce finer reso- 147 100 investigate the effect of surface circulation patterns on lution (1 1 and 19 vertical levels) fields for use with the 148 101 iceberg drift, a model previously validated in reproductions iceberg model. Global sea levels at the LGM were 120 m 149 102 of present-day iceberg distributions in both the Arctic [Bigg lower than present day [Fairbanks, 1989]; thus an LGM 150 103 et al., 1996] and Antarctic [Gladstone et al., 2001]. Brief coastline was determined from the Peltier [1994] ice sheet 151 104 details are given below (a fuller discussion is given by Bigg topography. Topography is taken from the ETOPO [1986] 152 105 et al., 1996, 1997; Gladstone, 2001 and Gladstone et al., 50 50 depth and elevation data set. This OGCM was forced 153 106 2001]. The model, including both dynamical and thermody- into two differing, stable LGM circulation states. The model 154 107 namical processes, is driven by gridded atmospheric (tem- naturally falls into a first state, the ‘‘northern sinking state’’ 155 108 perature and wind) and oceanic (temperature, surface current (NSS), with strong North Atlantic overturning. The second 156 109 and sea ice) forcing fields and aims to reproduce the main state, the ‘‘southern sinking state’’ (SSS) with little convec- 157 110 features of iceberg trajectories in the North Atlantic, tion in the North Atlantic, is obtained by adding a fresh- 158 1 111 although it is well known that ocean currents provide the water anomaly of 1 mm d over the North Atlantic, N of 159 112 dominant forcing for iceberg trajectories [e.g., Smith and 42N, for 500 years. 160 113 Banke, 1983; Bigg et al., 1997]. A number of melting [7] A third state, the ‘‘intermediate sinking state’’ (ISS) is 161 114 processes are parameterized: wave erosion, basal melting produced using a different OGCM [Wadley and Bigg, 2002; 162 115 and sidewall convection, solar and sensible heating, and Wadley et al., 2002]. Instead of a regular latitude-longitude 163 116 sublimation. Most of these processes increase with water grid, the model uses a curvilinear grid, with the model grid’s 164 117 temperature, but wave erosion becomes dominant away from North Pole in Greenland. This gives a coarse resolution in the 165 118 polar regions [Bigg et al., 1997]. The model is initialized far field but in the northern Atlantic the resolution is roughly 166 119 with icebergs of different sizes released from a number of 1–2. Thus the modeled forcing fields were interpolated back 167 120 circum–North Atlantic sources. Iceberg sizes and release to a regular latitude-longitude grid (1 1) for use in the 168 121 sites depend on the calving flux, here estimated from a mass iceberg model. The LGM simulation was produced by 169 122 balance analysis of LGM northern hemisphere ice sheets adjusting the present-day fluxes with LGM minus present- 170 123 [Bigg and Wadley, 2001]. In total, 419 icebergs are released day difference fields of wind stress, freshwater flux and 171
2of20 XXXXXX WATKINS ET AL.: LGM OCEAN CIRCULATION XXXXXX
172 surface air temperature (from the AGCM of Dong and make detailed comparison with the magnetic ‘‘fingerprints’’ 229 173 Valdes [1998]), with an additional freshwater flux of of both our LGM and present-day sediment samples, in 230 174 1mmd 1, added between 60 and 75N. This was done to order to constrain their sources where robustly possible 231 175 produce an ocean circulation, particularly in the Atlantic, [Watkins and Maher, 2003]. Samples from potential sedi- 232 176 most compatible with proxy records of sea surface temper- ment source areas were collected from: north African soils; 233 177 ature, oxygen isotopic records and intermediate depth European and American loess; Icelandic basalts and volca- 234 178 sinking pathways for ‘‘deep’’ water formed in the northern nic ash; Devonian and Triassic red beds from Spitsbergen 235 179 Atlantic. Thus, in this state, North Atlantic convection and East Greenland, respectively; Caribbean carbonates 236 180 occurs to intermediate depths in the central west North containing bacterial magnetite; granites from north Bylot 237 181 Atlantic, around 50–60N. Island; and a range of other lithologies from the circum- 238 182 [8] This third state is the one that would be expected to Atlantic area (see section 3.2 and Watkins and Maher 239 183 be, a priori, the best representation of the LGM ocean. The [2003]). Present-day regions of high iceberg flux and 240 184 NSS state illustrates a case of an extreme overturning, per- melting are strongly associated with distinctive source and 241 185 haps compatible with the short periods of sudden warmings sediment magnetic properties [Watkins and Maher, 2003], 242 186 experienced during glacial periods, while the SSS state often characterized by the presence of strongly magnetic, 243 187 illustrates the response of the ocean to a major and sustained magnetically coarse-grained, detrital components. Strongly 244 188 freshwater input to the North Atlantic. While none of the magnetic material, e.g., originating from the Mid-Atlantic 245 189 three states will correspond precisely to any real glacial Ridge, may also be transported and/or scoured by bottom 246 190 ocean state, particularly as these runs do not have an active water currents, e.g., in the South Iceland Basin by Iceland- 247 191 sea ice model, they cover the range of likely circulations Scotland Overflow water [e.g., Kissel et al., 1999]. How- 248 192 seen in the ocean during a glacial period. One can, also, ask ever, statistically significant changes in sediment magnetic 249 193 whether the 1 resolution ocean fields used to force the mineralogy along the path of deep water currents suggest 250 194 iceberg trajectory model are sufficiently detailed to produce that other detrital inputs additionally contribute within these 251 195 realistic trajectories, particularly in view of the importance linear depositional zones at the present day [Watkins and 252 196 of coastal boundary currents in advecting bergs away from Maher, 2003]. Other deep sea processes may also lead to 253 197 calving sites. Despite the limitations in ocean representa- differential settling and/or removal of fine-grained IRD. 254 198 tion, such resolution has been shown to be sufficient in [10] A suite of susceptibility and remanence measure- 255 199 present-day simulations for the North Atlantic to reproduce ments was applied to all samples with the aim of charac- 256 200 realistic geographic envelopes of iceberg trajectories [Bigg terizing their magnetic mineralogy, concentration and 257 201 et al., 1996]. The pattern differences, if not the detail, in magnetic grain size (domain state). Prior to measurement, 258 202 iceberg trajectories between the three ocean states should wet samples were dried at 40C, gently disaggregated and 259 203 therefore be robust. It is also worth remembering that packed into plastic sample holders, with sample weights 260 204 knowledge of the LGM ocean circulation can never be measured to allow for correction of magnetic measurements 261 205 better than the imprecise estimate of the atmospheric forcing to a dry mass-specific basis. We use the sediment magnetic 262 206 produced by much coarser atmospheric circulation models. properties as a tracer, or ‘‘fingerprint,’’ not as an indicator of 263 207 either magnetic concentration or sediment volume. Indeed, 264 208 2.2. Sediment Proxy Data in order to remove variations caused by changes in magnetic 265 209 [9] To determine LGM iceberg distributions, magnetic concentration (because of possible biogenic dilution and/or 266 210 susceptibility and a suite of room temperature remanences variations in sedimentation rates), interparametric ratios 267 211 were used to characterize and trace IRD in deep-sea sedi- were calculated from the susceptibility values (measured 268 212 ments right across the North Atlantic. In total, 154 North at low and high frequencies) and the anhysteretic and 269 213 Atlantic deep-sea sediment samples were obtained, from remanent magnetizations [see, e.g., Maher et al., 1999] 270 18 214 cores with existing chronologies based on d O records and for a summary of magnetic parameters and their application 271 14 215 C dating. All the sampled core sections fall within the to environmental contexts). Geographic plots of the data 272 216 LGM interval of 18–24 cal kyr B.P. and the sample lying were generated using ArcMap, each sample point being 273 18 217 centrally within the LGM interval of stable d O values was represented by a shaded area of 5 radius. 274 1 218 used in each case (see auxiliary material). The magnetic [11] To identify independently the presence of coarse 275 219 methods used follow those used to characterize modern day clastic particles (>150 mm), i.e., unambiguously diagnostic 276 220 North Atlantic sediments and sources [Watkins and Maher, of IRD origin, within our deep sea samples, we applied 277 221 2003]; details are given in the auxiliary material. The sediment dispersion and wet sieving to a representative 278 222 magnetic signature of a sample reflects its magnetic miner- geographic subset, comprising 46 samples (24 pelagic and 279 223 alogy and magnetic grain size. (Magnetic grain size should 22 hemipelagic sites). While such coarse particles might be 280 224 not be confused with clastic particle size; for example, large diagnostic of IRD origin [e.g., Andrews et al., 1998; Bond et 281 225 clastic particles might contain fine, magnetically single al., 1997], most IRD is composed of particles <150 mm [e.g., 282 226 domain magnetic grains - 0.05 mm in magnetite). We pre- Prins et al., 2002; Farmer et al., 2003]. Hence, to char- 283 227 viously measured the magnetic properties of a number of acterize the sediments robustly, magnetic measurements were 284 228 potential source samples all around the North Atlantic, to made of bulk samples, not the coarse-grained fractions. 285 [12] Given the reasonably large, multiparameter magnetic 286 data set produced from the sediment samples, two multi- 287 1Auxiliary material data sets are available at ftp://ftp.agu.org/apend/pa/ variate methods were used to analyze the data subsequently, 288 2006pa001281. Other auxiliary material files are in the HTML.
3of20 XXXXXX WATKINS ET AL.: LGM OCEAN CIRCULATION XXXXXX
in order to try to discriminate between possible sediment 289 groupings and therefore sources, and also identify any 290 mixing between sources. Fuzzy c means clustering and 291 nonlinear mapping, using the program of Vriend et al. 292 [1988], were used, so that samples are not forced to belong 293 to an individual cluster; instead, their degree of affinity with 294 each identified cluster is calculated. Fuzzy clustering was 295 run using four, independent, nonconcentration-dependent 296 magnetic parameters in order to differentiate sediments 297 based on the magnetic ‘‘signatures’’ of their constituent 298 magnetic grains: (1) the high field remanence (the HIRM, as 299 a percentage of the saturation remanence, SIRM), to identify 300 the presence of high-coercivity minerals, such as haematite 301 and goethite; (2) frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibil- 302 ity (cfd), to identify, where present, ultrafine-grained (<