The Readjuster Party and Black Organizational Politics in Post-Emancipation Virginia by David Golden

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Readjuster Party and Black Organizational Politics in Post-Emancipation Virginia by David Golden To End the “Color-Line”: The Readjuster Party and Black Organizational Politics in Post-Emancipation Virginia by David Golden Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In the Department of History at Brown University Thesis Advisor: Seth Rockman April 12, 2019 ii Dedication and Acknowledgements For my Opa, Arthur Zilversmit z”l, the first historian in my life Acknowledgements I want to express the deepest gratitude to all those who helped me reach this point: To my advisor, Professor Seth Rockman, for his guidance, dedication to my success, and incisive and thorough feedback which improved this thesis and my abilities as a historian immensely. I’m so glad to have worked with and learned from you. I would also like to thank Professor Naoko Shibusawa for her counsel throughout this entire process. Without her astute advice and encouragement, I would not have finished this project. I would also like to thank my History professors in general and especially Professor Robert Self, who guided me early in my time at Brown and in the Department. Professor Emily Owens’ teaching and research recommendations proved very helpful as I was beginning this project. I would also like to thank two professors from my first year when I attended Emory University, without whom I would not have written this thesis: to Professors Patrick Allitt and Daniel LaChance, I did not know I was a History student until I took your courses. Julia Rock, thank you for the time you dedicated in reading my thesis again (and again), for your invaluable edits, and for sharing in the travails of this lengthy project – we made it through this together. I am also grateful for the generous grant provided by the Brown University Department of History which allowed me to travel and research this summer at the David. M. Rubenstein Rare Book Library at Duke University. I owe a debt of gratitude to the archivists there as well. Finally, I’d like to thank my Oma, Charlotte Zilversmit, whose loving kindness has always sustained me. To my parents, Karen and Brad: I would not be here without you, thank for your unconditional love and support. To my siblings, Jess and Adam, it has been a great source of comfort to call you during my long nights of work to hear funny tales and speak to people I love. I thank my friends for their love, kindness, and encouragement. 1 Introduction A motley mix of poor Black and white voters, the Readjusters were a biracial electoral coalition that transformed Virginia politics between 1879 and 1883. In four short years of power, their accomplishments were notable. Carried into office by newly-enfranchised Black voters, the Readjusters expanded free public schools and ended a poll-tax that discriminated by race and class. In these new schools, Black men and women were hired as teachers and principals. Black men served on juries and Black politicians pushed the assembly to establish the first Black asylum and college in the state. The Readjusters also advocated for the laboring class with policies that included a lien law to protect workers’ pay over creditors, a tariff to product nascent industries, and a promise to regulate railroads.1 Sustained by Black voters and pushed forward by the Black politicians who joined the coalition, the party evolved over the years to become more supportive of Civil Rights and to expand the scope of the public goods it believed government should offer. However, after the party accomplished its central mission of lowering the state’s debt burden and expanding its public schools, the Readjusters lost the single issue that could unite Black and white Virginians alike.2 In 1883, their opponents returned to state-wide power in a bitterly racist campaign that conditioned the expansion of public services for the state’s poor on the enforcement of racial hierarchy. It proved a potent strategy, setting the stage for the politics of Jim Crow. 1 Jane Elizabeth Dailey, Before Jim Crow the Politics of Race in Postemancipation Virginia (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000), 82. 2 Here, and throughout, I will capitalize Black when referring to the people. I’m joining with Black scholars and publications in a long tradition of conferring capitalization as a matter of respect for and recognition of members of the African Diaspora. 2 Joining the Readjusters was not an obvious choice for Black Virginians. In March 1881, a group of Black legislators, activists, and labor leaders convened in Petersburg, Virginia to consider a coalition that would elevate a former Confederate army General, William Mahone, as the standard-bearer of this political insurgency.3 Black Virginians, unlike many of their peers in other Southern states, entered fusion politics from a position of strength: they held the balance of power in a divided legislature. After the 1879 Election, the Virginia legislature was split between the conservative Funders eager to slash public services in order to meet the state’s debt obligations and Mahone’s Readjusters who believed they could “re-adjust” the state’s debt obligations, lower taxes, and expand public services including the fledgling public-school system. Black lawmakers faced a choice and Virginia’s next US Senator hung in the balance, as might the governorship in the upcoming fall election. But of most importance to the Black politicians was the possibility of expanding their constituents’ hard-won and still-fresh freedom.4 The Petersburg delegates used their leverage wisely, extracting concessions from the Readjusters and forcing them to take a progressive position on Black civil rights. When their coalition won unified control of the state government in 1881, it endorsed free and fair voting, repealed the poll tax, abolished the whipping post, and distributed a fair share of the spoils of patronage to its Black members.5 At the Petersburg Convention, the delegates cast the lot of “the Colored People of Virginia” with the Readjuster party, expressing hope “that their interests will be better secured by aiding that party in its efforts to achieve and permanently settle the antagonism of races.” This was a moment of cautious optimism.6 3 Daniel Barclay Williams, A Sketch of the Life and Times of Capt.R. A. Paul. (Richmond, Va., [c1885]), 16, http://hdl.handle.net/2027/loc.ark:/13960/t76t0xz6g. 4 Dailey, Before Jim Crow the Politics of Race in Postemancipation Virginia, 46–47. 5 Williams, A Sketch of the Life and Times of Capt.R. A. Paul., 19; Dailey, Before Jim Crow the Politics of Race in Postemancipation Virginia, 46–47. 6 Williams, A Sketch of the Life and Times of Capt.R. A. Paul., 19. 3 Black politicians in Virginia held leverage because of their extensive political networks and success in getting their own people elected to the state assembly. Since 1865, they had done so as members of the Republican Party, whose leadership in Washington D.C. had stood for Emancipation and Black citizenship claims. No other national party had space for Black officeholders, but Republican partisan identity and organizational infrastructure was not particularly valuable to Black office-seekers in Virginia. Instead, they drew on political practices that had emerged in the time of slavery and extended into collective decision-making processes in the wake of emancipation and during the heady possibilities of Reconstruction. In the decisive election of 1879, fourteen Black legislators swept into office on the excitement generated by the campaign for free schools and the opportunity afforded when the debt issue split white voters’ loyalties. Their independent, personal political bases had helped them survive the diminishing support of the national Republican party and seize the electoral opportunity. Their bases also provided backstops of strength during negotiations with their coalition partners.7 The Black delegation elected that year was an able one, consisting of skilled men who owned land and possessed deep links to the kinship networks, beneficial organizations, churches, and secret societies that formed the basis of Black politics in this era.8 As Elsa Barkley Brown writes, these organizations reflected the politics of post-Emancipation Black communities where 7 There is some disagreement in the historical record concerning the identity of these men. Edward D. Bland, Johnson Collins, Shed Dungee, William D. Evans, Ross Hamilton, Neverson (or Nevison) Lewis, Robert Norton, Richard G. L. Paige, Archer Scott, and Henry D. Smith all served with either Littleton Evans or G. W. Cole comprising the eleventh. In the State Senate, Cephas L. Davis and Daniel Norton (brother of Robert) rounded out the Republican Delegation. Dailey, Before Jim Crow the Politics of Race in Postemancipation Virginia, 46–47; The first work to identify and write biographies of these men was Luther Porter Jackson, Negro Office-Holders in Virginia, 1865-1895 (Norfolk, Va: Guide Quality Press, 1945), https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015014725082. 8 Steven Hahn, A Nation under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration, 1st Harvard University Press paperback edition (Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005), 369; In his in-depth study of Readjuster Ross Hamilton’s career, Harold Forsythe calls this the “deep structure of African-American politics.” Harold S. Forsythe, “‘But My Friends Are Poor’: Ross Hamilton and Freedpeople’s Politics in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, 1869-1901,” The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 105, no. 4 (1997): 436. 4 “collective consciousness and collective responsibility” guided formal political participation. Black politics was directed towards the common good through “collective autonomy” rather than only the formal recognition of individual citizenship rights.9 These post-Emancipation organizations provided Black officials with their political base, and in turn Black politicians understood their own loyalty as belonging to these community institutions, not to any party apparatus.
Recommended publications
  • The Smithfield Review, Volume 20, 2016
    In this issue — On 2 January 1869, Olin and Preston Institute officially became Preston and Olin Institute when Judge Robert M. Hudson of the 14th Circuit Court issued a charter Includes Ten Year Index for the school, designating the new name and giving it “collegiate powers.” — page 1 The On June 12, 1919, the VPI Board of Visitors unanimously elected Julian A. Burruss to succeed Joseph D. Eggleston as president of the Blacksburg, Virginia Smithfield Review institution. As Burruss began his tenure, veterans were returning from World War I, and America had begun to move toward a post-war world. Federal programs Studies in the history of the region west of the Blue Ridge for veterans gained wide support. The Nineteenth Amendment, giving women Volume 20, 2016 suffrage, gained ratification. — page 27 A Note from the Editors ........................................................................v According to Virginia Tech historian Duncan Lyle Kinnear, “he [Conrad] seemed Olin and Preston Institute and Preston and Olin Institute: The Early to have entered upon his task with great enthusiasm. Possessed as he was with a flair Years of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Part II for writing and a ‘tongue for speaking,’ this ex-confederate secret agent brought Clara B. Cox ..................................................................................1 a new dimension of excitement to the school and to the town of Blacksburg.” — page 47 Change Amidst Tradition: The First Two Years of the Burruss Administration at VPI “The Indian Road as agreed to at Lancaster, June the 30th, 1744. The present Faith Skiles .......................................................................................27 Waggon Road from Cohongoronto above Sherrando River, through the Counties of Frederick and Augusta .
    [Show full text]
  • Lorne Bair Rare Books, ABAA 661 Millwood Avenue, Ste 206 Winchester, Virginia USA 22601
    LORNE BAIR RARE BOOKS CATALOG 26 Lorne Bair Rare Books, ABAA 661 Millwood Avenue, Ste 206 Winchester, Virginia USA 22601 (540) 665-0855 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lornebair.com TERMS All items are offered subject to prior sale. Unless prior arrangements have been made, payment is expected with or- der and may be made by check, money order, credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover, American Express), or direct transfer of funds (wire transfer or Paypal). Institutions may be billed. Returns will be accepted for any reason within ten days of receipt. ALL ITEMS are guaranteed to be as described. Any restorations, sophistications, or alterations have been noted. Autograph and manuscript material is guaranteed without conditions or restrictions, and may be returned at any time if shown not to be authentic. DOMESTIC SHIPPING is by USPS Priority Mail at the rate of $9.50 for the first item and $3 for each additional item. Overseas shipping will vary depending upon destination and weight; quotations can be supplied. Alternative carriers may be arranged. WE ARE MEMBERS of the ABAA (Antiquarian Bookseller’s Association of America) and ILAB (International League of Antiquarian Book- sellers) and adhere to those organizations’ strict standards of professionalism and ethics. CONTENTS OF THIS CATALOG _________________ AFRICAN AMERICANA Items 1-35 RADICAL & PROLETARIAN LITERATURE Items 36-97 SOCIAL & PROLETARIAN LITERATURE Items 98-156 ART & PHOTOGRAPHY Items 157-201 INDEX & REFERENCES PART 1: AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY & LITERATURE 1. ANDREWS, Matthew Page Heyward Shepherd, Victim of Violence. [Harper’s Ferry?]: Heyward Shepherd Memorial Association, [1931]. First Edition. Slim 12mo (18.5cm.); original green printed card wrappers, yapp edges; 32pp.; photograph.
    [Show full text]
  • African American Reaction to Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation
    “God Is Settleing the Account”: African American Reaction to Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation HE WHITE MAN SEATED ACROSS THE ROOM was offering them a new life in a land of opportunity. Against the backdrop of TWashington’s sweaty August, in 1862, he told his five black guests from the District of Columbia about a temperate, welcoming place, with fine harbors, exotic flora and fauna, and vast reserves of minerals. “There is evidence of very rich coal mines,” he offered. Surely they—ministers, teachers, and a congressional messenger—could understand that whites (notwithstanding his own feelings) would never treat them as equals on American soil. “Your race are suffering, in my judgment, the greatest wrong inflicted on any people,” he told them. But he seemed more con- cerned with injuries to his own race: “See our present condition—the country engaged in war!—our white men cutting one another’s throats. But for your race among us, there could not be war.” He offered to finance their passage to a new home in a mountainous quarter of the Isthmus of Panama known as Chiriquí. The government had in hand a glowing report on everything from Chiriquí’s climate and coal to its value as a forward post of US influence in Central America. This article is adapted and expanded from our book Tasting Freedom: Octavius Catto and the Battle for Equality in Civil War America (Philadelphia, 2010). Other major sources include Eric Foner, The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery (New York, 2010); Kate Masur, “The African American Delegation to Abraham Lincoln: A Reappraisal,” Civil War History 56 (2010): 117–44; and numerous documents reviewed in C.
    [Show full text]
  • W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Agency and the Slaves' Civil War
    W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Agency and the Slaves' Civil War Kelly, B. (2016). W. E. B. Du Bois, Black Agency and the Slaves' Civil War. International Socialist Review, (100), 48-68. http://isreview.org/issue/100/w-e-b-du-bois-black-agency-and-slaves-civil-war Published in: International Socialist Review Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyleft 2016 The Author General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:27. Sep. 2021 W. E. B. Du Bois, Black agency and the slaves’ Civil War By Brian Kelly or most of the century and a half that has passed since the end of the US Civil War, the four mil- Flion African Americans held as slaves in the Confederate South were wrien out of any meaningful role in their own emancipation.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Women in Massachusetts, 1700-1783
    2014 Felicia Y. Thomas ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ENTANGLED WITH THE YOKE OF BONDAGE: BLACK WOMEN IN MASSACHUSETTS, 1700-1783 By FELICIA Y. THOMAS A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History written under the direction of Deborah Gray White and approved by ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Entangled With the Yoke of Bondage: Black Women in Massachusetts, 1700-1783 By FELICIA Y. THOMAS Dissertation Director: Deborah Gray White This dissertation expands our knowledge of four significant dimensions of black women’s experiences in eighteenth century New England: work, relationships, literacy and religion. This study contributes, then, to a deeper understanding of the kinds of work black women performed as well as their value, contributions, and skill as servile laborers; how black women created and maintained human ties within the context of multifaceted oppression, whether they married and had children, or not; how black women acquired the tools of literacy, which provided a basis for engagement with an interracial, international public sphere; and how black women’s access to and appropriation of Christianity bolstered their efforts to resist slavery’s dehumanizing effects. While enslaved females endured a common experience of race oppression with black men, gender oppression with white women, and class oppression with other compulsory workers, black women’s experiences were distinguished by the impact of the triple burden of gender, race, and class. This dissertation, while centered on the experience of black women, considers how their experience converges with and diverges from that of white women, black men, and other servile laborers.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins and Development of Legal Racial Exclusion In
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles American Ethnocracy: Origins and Development of Legal Racial Exclusion in Comparative Perspective, 1600s to 1900s A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Wesley Hiers 2013 © Copyright by Wesley Hiers 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION American Ethnocracy: Origins and Development of Legal Racial Exclusion in Comparative Perspective, 1600s to 1900s by Wesley Hiers Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Andreas Wimmer, Chair This dissertation directs sociology’s political-institutional turn to the puzzle of legal racial exclusion (LRE)—a social phenomenon wherein states classify their populations by race and assign unequal rights to dominants and subordinates on this basis. Spanning from colonial times to the civil rights era, this dissertation offers a long-run perspective on how political institutions—modes of imperial rule, party systems and coalitions, and legislative arrangements—have shaped the emergence, endurance, and demise of LRE. Chapter one uses a macro-comparative analysis to explain why LRE emerged in some former European settlement colonies but not others. The basic argument links the emergence of LRE in the independence era to colonial legacies of settler self-rule: where European settlers established autonomous, representative governments during the colonial period, LRE later developed. Focusing on the United States, the next three chapters then examine the political ii institutions and alliances that sustained LRE until the 1960s. Compared to other cases of LRE, the United States is the only one where LRE became an object of significant political contestation several decades before this exclusion was actually overcome.
    [Show full text]
  • STEVEN HAHN Personal Home Address: 420 East 80Th Street, Apt. 9B New York, New York 10075 (610) 716-3656 [email protected] Education
    1 STEVEN HAHN Personal Home Address: 420 East 80th Street, Apt. 9B New York, New York 10075 (610) 716-3656 [email protected] Education Ph.D., History, Yale University, 1979 M.Phil., History, Yale University, 1976 M.A., History, Yale University, 1975 B.A., University of Rochester, 1973 Employment Professor of History, New York University, July 2016-- Roy F. and Jeannette P. Nichols Professor in American History, University of Pennsylvania, July 2003–June 2016 Professor of History, Northwestern University, July 1998-June 2003 Professor of History, University of California, San Diego, July 1987-June 1998 Associate Professor of History, University of California, San Diego, July 1983-June 1987 Visiting Associate Editor, Freedmen and Southern Society Project, University of Maryland, 1983-84 Assistant Professor of History, University of California, San Diego, July 1981-June 1983 Assistant Professor of History, University of Delaware, September 1979- June 1981 Lecturer in Yale College, Spring 1976, Spring 1979 Academic Honors - Scholarship Rogers Distinguished Fellow in Nineteenth Century History, Huntington Library, San Marino CA, 2016-17 National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowship, 2012 Elected to the Pulitzer Prize Board, 2011-- Appointed Pitt Professor, University of Cambridge, 2011-12 (declined) Nathan I. Huggins Lecturer, Harvard University, 2007 Lawrence Stone Visiting Professorship, Princeton University, 2006 Pulitzer Prize in History, 2004, for A Nation under Our Feet Bancroft Prize in American History, 2004, for A Nation under Our Feet
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. VLR Listed: 12/12/2019 1. Name of Property NRHP Listed: 3/19/2020 Historic name: Courtland Historic District Other names/site number: VDHR Architectural Inventory Number: 201-5001 Name of related multiple property listing: __N/A____________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: City or town: _Courtland_ State: VA County: Southampton Not For Publication: N/A Vicinity: N/A ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural
    [Show full text]
  • Pulitzer Prize-Winning History Books (PDF)
    PULITZER PRIZE WINNING HISTORY BOOKS The Past 50 Years 2013 Embers of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America's Vietnam by Fredrik Logevall 2012 Malcolm X : A Life of Reinvention by Manning Marable 2011 The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery by Eric Foner 2010 Lords of Finance: The Bankers Who Broke the World by Liaquat Ahamed 2009 The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family by Annette Gordon- Reed 2008 "What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848" by Daniel Walker Logevall 2007 The Race Beat: The Press, the Civil Rights Struggle, and the Awakening of a Nation by Gene Roberts and Hank Klibanoff 2006 Polio: An American Story by David M. Oshinsky 2005 Washington's Crossing by David Hackett Fischer 2004 A Nation Under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration by Steven Hahn 2003 An Army at Dawn: The War in North Africa, 1942-1943 by Rick Atkinson 2002 The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America by Louis Menand 2001 Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation by Joseph J. Ellis 2000 Freedom From Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945 by David M. Kennedy 1999 Gotham : A History of New York City to 1898 by Edwin G. Burrows and Mike Wallace 1998 Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate Over Science and Religion by Edward J. Larson 1997 Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution by Jack N. Rakove 1996 William Cooper's Town: Power and Persuasion on the Frontier of the Early American Republic by Alan Taylor 1995 No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The Home Front in World War II by Doris Kearns Goodwin 1994 (No Award) 1993 The Radicalism of the American Revolution by Gordon S.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy of American Development, 1860-1900 (Spring 2005)
    Political Economy of American Development, 1860-1900 (Spring 2005) Government 611 Tuesday, 4:30-6:30 Richard Bensel White B 04 Course Description This course will trace the political economy of national state formation from the last decades of the antebellum period, through the Civil War and Reconstruction eras, and conclude with the transition to a more industrial society during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Utilizing a broad survey of the literature on these periods, the course will investigate: (1) the connection between slavery and the emergence of southern separatism; (2) the impact of conflict between the plantation South and industrializing North on American state formation; (3) the failure of post-Civil War attempts to remold the southern political economy; (4) the role of finance capital markets in industrial and western agrarian expansion and the consequent emergence of monetary issues in national politics; (5) the political economic basis of possible developmental trajectories other than the high-tariff, gold-standard one actually followed; and (6) the failure of intense conflict between labor and capital on the factory floor to move into national politics. Course Requirements: Students can choose between two options. Both options commit you to organize and lead the opening discussion for at least two of the sessions (usually a 30-35 minute responsibility). Option one also requires a 72 hour take-home examination, conducted as if it were a small version of a Ph.D. qualifying examination. In place of the exam, option two commits you to lead discussion in two additional sessions as well as prepare a research paper of (to be negotiated) length.
    [Show full text]
  • COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT of HISTORY Fall 2012 Monday, 4:10-6 Pm Professor E
    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY Fall 2012 Monday, 4:10-6 pm Professor E. Foner Office Hours: Tuesday, 2-4 pm email: ef17 HISTORY W4518x SLAVERY AND EMANCIPATION IN THE UNITED STATES This course examines the central turning point of American history and a few influential examples of the historical literature that has sought to understand it. For each week, one student will be assigned to prepare four or five discussion questions for the class. These should be sent by email to participants and the instructor at least one day before the class meeting. In addition, each student will write a 15-20-page historiographical essay examining the literature on a problem or question related to the era covered by the course. The paper is due on Friday, December 14. The readings below are all required. All books are available in paperback except Delbanco’s. The books are available at Book Culture on 112th Street east of Broadway. Copies of the articles are available online via the library website. All books are also available in the Reserve Room in Butler. September 10: The Origins of Slavery Ira Berlin, Many Thousands Gone: The First Two Centuries of Slavery in North America September 17: No Class September 24: Master and Slave Eugene D. Genovese, Roll, Jordan, Roll, Books 1, 2, 4 October 1: Slavery and the Nation Adam Rothman, Slave Country October 8: The Old South at the Local Level Melvin P. Ely, Israel on the Appomattox October 15: The Politics of Slavery Manisha Sinha, The Counter Revolution of Slavery: Politics and Ideology in Antebellum South Carolina October 22: The Antislavery Crusade Andrew Delbanco, The Abolitionist Imagination Gary Kornblith, “Rethinking the Coming of the Civil War: A Counter- factual Exercise,” Journal of American History, June 2003, 76-105 Michael E.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanities Through the Ages
    Edition 17| Number 1 | November 2015 E ras Humanities Through the Ages American Civil War 150th Anniversary Supplement Editorial “A House Divided”: Understanding Southerners’ Dislike for Abraham Lincoln Darren Dobson “The Course Pursued by the President”: Michigan Sol- diers Respond to the Emancipation Proclamation (1863) David P. Hopkins, Jr ‘Burying the Shackles’: The impact of racial violence on free black labour in the Reconstructed South (1865- 1877) Cecily Tiernan Reviews Table of Contents American Civil War Supplement Editorial ii “A House Divided”: Understanding Southerners’ Dislike for Abraham 120-137 Lincoln Darren Dobson “The Course Pursued by the President”: Michigan Soldiers Respond to 138-152 the Emancipation Proclamation (1863) David P. Hopkins, Jr ‘Burying the Shackles’: The impact of racial violence on free black 153-167 labour in the Reconstructed South (1865-1877) Cecily Tiernan Reviews 168-171 Editorial The American Civil War was one of the defining events that shaped the history of the United States, and the echoes of its outcome still reverberate today. Over four years, from 1861 until 1865, more than 625,000 lives were lost, over one million casualties were suffered, and few American families, black or white, remained untouched by war. As well as the devastating human cost, the war ravaged the South, leaving its infrastructure in tatters. The war, however, brought the end of the vile institution of slavery, and over four million African Americans became free. It is with great pleasure that Eras brings you this special American Civil War 150th Anniversary supplement. We have three articles which, while appearing unconnected, indicate a progression of how the end of slavery shaped the thoughts and actions of Americans from both the North and the South.
    [Show full text]