Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Halmahera and Seram: Different Histories, but Similar Butterfly Faunas

Halmahera and Seram: Different Histories, but Similar Butterfly Faunas

Halmahera and Seram faunas 315 Halmahera and Seram: different histories, but similar butterfly faunas

Rienk de Jong Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Department of Entomology, P O Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands+ Email: jong@nnm+nl

Key words: historical , faunal similarity, Moluccas, Halmahera, Seram,

Abstract provinces of N and C , but excluding Kepulauan Sula, which biogeographically forms The islands of Halmahera and Seram in the Moluccas (east part of the region, and the Banda and ) have very different geological histories Their Gorong archipelagos& Halmahera is, at 17,400 present relative proximity is the result of a long westward km2, the larger island, but at 16,720 km2, Seram journey of Halmahera It is uncertain when the island emerged, and thus was first able to support a terrestrial is only slightly smaller& The greater part of fauna Seram emerged at c5 Ma at approximately its present Halmahera lies north of the equator& Seram is location On the basis of current geological scenarios, ex- situated well to the south, about 220 km from pected distribution patterns for terrestrial organisms are pro- the southern tip of Halmahera& The island of Obi posed These patterns are tested using information on spe- cies distribution, and phylogeny of butterflies lies at about one third of this distance from The butterfly faunas of Halmahera and Seram are re- Halmahera to Seram& Halmahera and Seram markably similar for faunas that have never been closer to share the same humid and hot climate, with an each other than today This is attributed to independent average yearly rainfall of 1,500-2,000 mm and colonization by the same from Sulawesi and particu- lowland temperatures varying between 25oC larly from  The different geological histories of o the two islands are not reflected in their butterfly faunas and 30 C& Monsoons and mountains affect the Two possible reasons for this are suggested: either the older rainfall, but it is still rather generally distributed fauna of Halmahera was wiped out by later colonists, or throughout the year& The natural vegetation is Halmahera only emerged as recently or even later than rain forest& There is still untouched forest left, Seram Endemism in the Moluccas is high (213% of the 385 spe- but, particularly in Halmahera, deforestation is cies) Distribution patterns of the endemic species indicate proceeding fast& There is a marked difference in that faunal exchange between the northern and southern height, the highest peak in Halmahera, Gunung islands of the Moluccas has been limited to less than 15% of Gamkunoro, reaching an altitude of 1635 m, the 82 endemic species This is a further indication that the while Gunung Binaiya, the highest mountain of similarity between Halmahera and Seram is not due to a direct exchange of species, but to independent invasions Seram, ascends to 3027 m& As a consequence, from outside by the same species Seram is more diverse in terms of habitat& Halmahera and Seram are situated more or less halfway between Sulawesi and New Introduction Guinea, but smaller islands to the east and west of Halmahera and Seram reduce their degree of Halmahera and Seram are the largest islands of isolation from these far larger islands& Between the east Indonesian province of Maluku (Fig&1)& the northeastern tip of Sulawesi and Halmahera, This province does not completely coincide a slightly larger distance than between with the old notion of Moluccas& Following Halmahera and Seram, there are only two tiny Vane-Wright and Peggie (1994) the Moluccas islands, Mayu and Tifore, whereas between have been taken here to include the sub- Halmahera and New Guinea, also a slightly

Biogeography and Geological Evolution of SE , pp 315-325 Edited by Robert Hall and Jeremy D Holloway © 1998 Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands 316 Rienk de Jong

terms of shared taxa must be the result of long distance dispersal, and not of range fragmenta- tion& A fauna typically consists of species exhib- iting a spectrum of range sizes, from narrow endemics to wide-ranging or even cosmopolitan species& A study of the history of a fauna should address all elements of this fauna, and not just the narrow endemics& This will be elaborated further in the section below on Methods& Wallace (1869) claimed a predominantly New Guinea origin for the avifauna of the Moluccas, but later students (e+g+, Bowler and Taylor, 1993) stressed the strong Asian representation in the faunas of the Moluccas and New Guinea, and Gressitt (1982) estimated that 60- 95% of the Papuan fauna (depending on the group of under study) had Oriental ori- Fig1 Location of Halmahera and Seram in east Indonesia gins& The present paper is not concerned with such larger scale distributional histories, but in- vestigates only the biogeographic links in the butterfly faunas of Halmahera and Seram, and larger stretch of water than between Halmahera with Sulawesi and New Guinea& Even so, this and Seram, there are several islands, such as may help to understand the biogeographic his- Gebe, Gag and Waigeo& Seram is separated from tory of the whole of the Moluccas& New Guinea by about 140 km, but the distance to Sulawesi is considerably greater, about 550 km& There are, however, several islands be- Methods tween Seram and Sulawesi, including , and the Sula and Banggai archipelagos, which could In biogeographic studies of the last 15 years, an serve as stepping stones& approach has dominated in which the history of In spite of their relative isolation, Halmahera areas is considered the crucial factor in the dis- and Seram have remarkably similar butterfly fau- tribution of life& This approach originated from nas& Of the 200 species known from Halmahera the work of Croizat (e+g+, 1962)& The coupling of 58&5% are also found in Seram, while 52% of the phylogenetic data to geological history, the ba- 225 butterfly species of Seram is also found in sis of cladistic biogeography, has led to very Halmahera& Applying Jaccard’s coefficient of fruitful research, partly thanks to the develop- similarity (Krebs, 1989), the butterfly faunas of ment of computer hardware and software able Halmahera and Seram (total fauna 304 species) to evaluate large amounts of data (e+g+, the are exactly as similar (Sj = 0&39) as the butterfly COMPONENT program of Page, 1993)& In this faunas of Spain and Northwest Africa (total approach areas are considered related in terms fauna 243 species; data from Tennent, 1996, and of a shared biological history (as expressed in Vives Moreno, 1994), which are, however, only the phylogenies of the studied organisms)& It 15 km apart, and not 220 km like Halmahera and leads to a hypothesis of area history, which can Seram& Knowing that the two islands have very be corroborated or falsified by geological data& different geological histories, it is of interest to This approach, though robust, does not deal investigate the possible causes of this similarity& with faunas, but with informative taxa& In this The history of the areas is taken as a starting context, informative means that taxa may reflect point rather than something to be derived from the history of the areas where they occur& The the distribution of organisms& Thus, the present more widespread a taxon is, the less informative contribution is not concerned with the relation- it is in this sense& As a consequence, cladistic ship of areas, but with the history of existing biogeography may reveal and explain historical faunas and how this may have been affected by patterns of areas and distributions, but only part the history of the areas& Since the areas con- of the distributional history of the fauna as a cerned (Halmahera, Seram, Sulawesi and New whole, which indeed is a mixture of old and Guinea) have never been connected by land, new species, with old and new distributional similarities between any two of the areas in patterns& Halmahera and Seram butterfly faunas 317

There are some practical problems in the ap- ous arc during the Oligocene (Hall, 1998 this plication of the method, particularly in the de- volume)& tection and meaning of areas of endemism, and It is not certain from the literature when the in the synchrony of speciation patterns& By its islands of the Halmahera arc emerged& In a Late procedure, cladistic biogeography is an induc- Eocene reconstruction of the New Guinea-Bis- tive method& It leads to hypotheses which can marck region, Struckmeyer et al+ (1993) sup- only be tested by evidence from outside, e+g+, posed that in the Halmahera arc parts of geology& This can be a mutually beneficial enter- Halmahera, Waigeo and Gauttier were dry land& prise& However, if the geological history is well- At the time, the northern half of New Guinea established or if there are competing geological was little more than a number of allochthonous hypotheses, it may be more effective to apply a terranes carrying partly widely separate, sub- hypothetico-deductive method, meaning that on merged or emerged islands (see Boer, 1995, for the basis of geological knowledge, hypotheses a summary)& The terranes successively accreted of distributional patterns are formulated, which to the northern craton of the , then can be tested against actual patterns& Such starting with the terrane, about 25 Ma, patterns can, but need not, be phylogenetic, and while the Arfak terrane, supposed to have origi- no part of the fauna is excluded beforehand& nally been part of the Halmahera arc, only The author has applied this approach before accreted to New Guinea at 2 Ma according to (e+g&, de Jong and Congdon, 1993; de Jong and Pigram and Davies, 1987 (cf& Hall, 1998 this vol- Treadaway, 1993; de Jong, 1997a), and it will be ume)& Accretion and uplift finally shaped followed here& present-day New Guinea but, at the time of ori- The overall question to be answered in this gin of Halmahera, New Guinea did not exist in contribution is: are the different geological his- its present form& What did exist were some tories of Halmahera and Seram reflected in dif- emergent islands of the Sepik terrane (Central ferent distributional patterns in the butterfly fau- New Guinea) to the southwest of the Halmahera nas of these islands? If not, what possible causes arc while the Kemum terrane, with a relatively could there be? Problems not addressed here in- large emergent part (according to Struckmeyer clude the origin of the faunas of Sulawesi and et al+, 1993) and the Misool terrane, with a small New Guinea& After a short explanation of the emergent part, were located far to the west& The geological histories of Halmahera and Seram, Kemum terrane forms the greater part of the the patterns to be tested are formulated& present-day Bird’s Head of New Guinea, situ- ated to the east of Misool& According to Rangin et al+ (1990) and others, Geological history of Halmahera and Seram at 10 Ma Halmahera lay approximately 800 km southeast of its present position& Between 8 and Halmahera consists of a younger western vol- 4 Ma it (or rather the still separated western and canic part and an eastern part& The two parts eastern parts) passed by the Bird’s Head& It collided between 3 and 1 Ma (Hall and Nichols, reached its present position recently, and is still 1990)& The oldest rocks in the basement of east- moving westward& During its entire life ern Halmahera are of Cretaceous or greater age Halmahera has never been close to any part of (see Hall et al& 1995, for a summary of the geol- Sulawesi; it has always been closer to, or associ- ogy of the Halmahera region)& The island origi- ated with, terranes that finally accreted with nated far east of its present position as part of an New Guinea& Furthermore, the east Philippine arc system bordering the Pacific plate& The islands have always been closer to Halmahera Halmahera islands have a stratigraphic record than to Sulawesi (see reconstructions in Hall, which indicates that for most of the Cenozoic 1996)& they were submerged although with a pro- The origin of Seram is still a matter of debate, longed, albeit discontinuous, volcanic arc his- although it is not doubted that its roots are Aus- tory and were at least locally emergent for short tralian& Some authors suppose that it formed a intervals (Hall, 1987; Hall et al&, 1995 and refer- microcontinent with Buru& This block probably ences therein)& The east Philippine islands (the rifted from the Australian continent, possibly east Philippine arc of Hall, 1996) also belonged from as far east as central to this arc system& Halmahera and surrounding (e+g+, Pigram and Panggabean, 1984), or from islands (e+g+, Waigeo, Biak, Yapen and parts of northwestern (e+g+, Daly et al+, 1991)& present-day northern New Guinea, such as the According to Hall (1996), Seram moved east- Gauttier Mountains) formed a broadly continu- ward relative to the Bird’s Head, from 12-4 Ma, 318 Rienk de Jong and northward to its present position relative to indirect clues& Supposing that some part of the Bird’s Head, from 4-0 Ma& Biogeographically (proto-)Halmahera has always remained sub- the uncertainties about the early evolution of aerial, a greater age and longer period of isola- Seram are not important& According to Audley- tion could have had the following effects on the Charles (1986, 1993), there was no land be- fauna of Halmahera relative to Seram: tween the coast of Australia-New Guinea and B1: Presence of older species& This can only be Sulawesi before the emergence& As checked in monophyletic groups with endemic shown by sedimentary rocks, Seram was be- representatives in Halmahera, Seram and at least neath the sea until about 6 Ma& Fortuin and de one other area& Smet (1991) estimate the time of emergence of B2: Higher endemism+ Apart from speciation Seram at 5 Ma& It emerged by uplift, and it has rate, degree of endemism depends on diversity never been connected to other land areas, a of habitats and degree of isolation, either in time deep marine trough separating it from New or in space& Since Seram has more diverse habi- Guinea and Misool& Nevertheless, New Guinea tats due to higher altitudes, it could be expected was the closest land area& According to the re- to have more endemics than Halmahera, if other constructions by Hall (1996), at 5 Ma Buru and things, including age and degree of isolation, the Sula archipelago, which at present form the were equal& If Halmahera has an equal or higher connecting link with Sulawesi, were still far to endemism than Seram, either it is older or it has the north of Seram& been more strongly isolated in space, or both& B3: Reduced similarity to New Guinea+ Due to speciation and extinction, not only in Patterns to be expected Halmahera but in New Guinea as well& This would also apply to Sulawesi if Halmahera had Based on different geological histories and dif- originated in its present position, which we ferent or similar ages for the terrestrial faunas of know it did not& Clearly this pattern only makes Halmahera and Seram, the following biogeo- sense if proto-Halmahera was close enough to graphic patterns can be expected& proto-New Guinea to exchange organisms&

General Topographic origin and subsequent history

Different histories are supposed to lead to differ- The differences between Halmahera and Seram ent faunas& Conversely, do similar faunas have in history could have led to the following differ- similar histories? The similarity between faunas ent patterns: can be expressed in several ways& It is usually C1: There has not been much difference be- measured at the species level, but in addition tween Halmahera and Seram in the degree of there are other ways of measuring similarity& isolation from Sulawesi& When Seram emerged One way is similarity above the species level, as from the sea it was probably closer to Sulawesi will be explained below& The other way is by than Halmahera, then to the north of the Bird’s comparing what is here called distribution pro- Head, but Buru and the Sula islands were still so files, a breakdown of a regional fauna according far to the north that they could not function as to distribution patterns& It is an overall compari- stepping stones between Sulawesi and Seram& son from which some conclusions can readily When they reached that position, Halmahera be drawn& Faunas of historically different areas also reached its present position& Consequently, are supposed to have different distribution pro- the expected pattern is a comparable degree of files& In other words, Halmahera and Seram similarity between the faunas of Halmahera and would be predicted to have different profiles, Sulawesi on one hand, and between those of unless the early history of Halmahera has not Seram and Sulawesi on the other& left any traces, because of extinction or because C2: If Halmahera was subaerial from Eocene Halmahera was submerged (pattern A)& times and it received butterflies at such an early date, the butterfly fauna would not have been very different from the fauna found on other is- Age lands of the Halmahera arc, like Waigeo and Gauttier, and after emergence also Biak, Yapen In the absence of or other clues to (rela- and Arfak& An indication for the existence of tive or absolute) age, we must resort to more such a fauna would be distribution patterns in- Halmahera and Seram butterfly faunas 319 volving some of these areas and excluding other Table 1 Number of butterfly species in Halmahera and areas& Seram, with the numbers of these species also occurring in C3: Whatever the time of emergence, Sulawesi and/or New Guinea Halmahera has always been closer to New Guinea than to Sulawesi; consequently, it can be Sulawesi Halmahera Seram New Guinea expected that the similarity of the Halmahera fauna with the New Guinea fauna should be Hesperiidae 19 25 32 30 much greater than with the Sulawesi fauna& Papilionidae 10 20 17 13 C4: Since Seram emerged much closer to New Pieridae 12 23 30 12 Lycaenidae 34 54 72 60 Guinea than to other areas of dry land, it can be Nymphalidae 38 78 74 62 expected to carry a fauna that is much more similar to the fauna of New Guinea than to the Total 113 200 225 177 fauna of Sulawesi& C5: If the fauna of Seram actually came from New Guinea, the ties with New Guinea are older than with Sulawesi, since Buru and the Sula ar- chipelago could only act as stepping stones at a terns, and for each distribution pattern the per- much later date& Consequently, among the New centages of the species relative to the total Guinea links would be older species than number of species in Halmahera and Seram, re- among the Sulawesi links& This can only be spectively, are given& In Fig&2 the percentages of tested in cases of endemics in the three areas Tables 2 and 3 are represented graphically in a forming a monophyletic or paraphyletic group& distribution profile, which allows a quick com- Biogeographically it seems an unlikely pattern& parison of the faunas of Halmahera and Seram& C6: Halmahera and Seram have never been Although there are slight differences in the per- closer to each other than nowadays, and have centages, the profiles for the two islands are re- never been connected directly or indirectly& markably similar, suggesting a largely similar Similarity between the two islands can be ex- biogeographic history for the butterflies& It is pected to involve mainly widespread species (at also clear that a greater part of the faunas (55&6% least covering New Guinea, in addition to in Seram, 59&8% in Halmahera) is widespread, Halmahera and Seram), and species only occur- i+e+, involving at least three areas& This is to be ring in Halmahera and Seram are not to be ex- expected in islands that were colonized by long pected, unless by chance dispersal& distance dispersal over about the same length of The expected patterns are based on the sup- time& The profiles further show that the Sulawesi position that butterflies have existed in the area connection excluding New Guinea is much at least since the origin of Halmahera& The sup- weaker (Halmahera 26 species or 13&3%, Seram position may be self-evident, but the presence 27 species or 12&2%) than the New Guinea con- of the butterflies is not& The oldest butter- nection excluding Sulawesi (Halmahera 70 spe- fly remains are about 50 Ma old (de Jong, 1997b) cies or 35&3%, Seram 76 species or 33&7%)& It not but the butterflies as a taxon must be much only agrees with the supposition that Halmahera older& Undoubtedly, when (proto-) Halmahera and Seram have always been closer to New and surrounding islands emerged in the Terti- Guinea, but also shows that the degree of isola- ary, the butterflies as a group already existed, tion with respect to Sulawesi and New Guinea but the young islands may have been too iso- has been about the same for the two islands (see lated for the first butterflies to reach them at a above, expected general pattern)& very early date&

Similarity at the species level Patterns actually found Many coefficients are available to express the Distribution profile similarity of two regional faunas, or two samples in general (Krebs, 1989)& Applying Jaccard’s co- Table 1 gives the number of species per butter- efficient (proportion of shared species relative fly in Halmahera and Seram, and the to total number of species in the two areas) we number of species also occurring in Sulawesi find that the butterfly faunas of Halmahera and and New Guinea& In Tables 2 and 3 these num- Sulawesi, and those of Seram and Sulawesi are bers have been broken down to distribution pat- equally similar, in both cases Sj = 0&04& The same 320 Rienk de Jong

Table 2 Numbers and percentages of non-endemic butterfly Table 3 Numbers and percentages of non-endemic butterfly species of Halmahera, divided over the seven possible distri- species of Seram, divided over the seven possible distribution bution patterns For coding of distribution patterns, see Fig2 patterns For coding of distribution patterns, see Fig2

Halmahera 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Seram 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Hesperiidae 4 0 1 2 1 8 9 Hesperiidae 1 0 9 2 2 8 9 Papilionidae 2 2 1 2 1 4 3 Papilionidae 0 2 2 2 2 4 3 Pieridae 1 2 1 2 0 3 5 Pieridae 2 2 1 2 2 3 5 Lycaenidae 1 1 12 3 6 11 10 Lycaenidae 6 1 13 3 8 11 10 Nymphalidae 3 3 11 6 2 18 22 Nymphalidae 3 3 7 6 2 18 22 total 11 8 26 15 10 44 49 total 12 8 32 15 16 44 49 percentage 56 41 133 77 51 22 25 percentage 54 36 142 68 72 195 221

applies to the similarity of the butterfly faunas of the average Sulawesi species& Thus, the greater Halmahera and New Guinea on one hand, and similarity of the Moluccan islands to New that of Seram and New Guinea on the other, in Guinea than to Sulawesi appears to be the result both cases the coefficient being Sj = 0&08& Thus not only of the richer New Guinea fauna but of we find that the butterfly faunas of Halmahera the shorter distance& This is in agreement with and Seram are (a) equally similar to the faunas expected patterns C3 and C4& of Sulawesi and New Guinea respectively (con- tra expected pattern B3, but in agreement with expected pattern C1), and (b) have a much Similarity above the species level greater similarity to New Guinea than to Sulawesi& The latter finding is not surprising Similarity at the species level may be reduced by since the New Guinea fauna is much richer (es- extinction and speciation after the dispersal timated to be at least 800 species) than the event& Since Halmahera and Seram have en- Sulawesi fauna (470 species)& However, New demic species, it is clear that speciation has oc- Guinea is a very large island and many of its curred in the islands& Finding their sister species species occur further away from Halmahera than either in New Guinea or Sulawesi would strengthen the ties with these areas& For this we need phylogenetic studies& Phylogenetic infor- mation on the endemics is available for very few 25 species only& These cases will be discussed& In Halmahera some other cases an approximation can be 20 Seram made by checking the overall distribution of the

percentages ; if it occurs only either east or west of the 15 Moluccas, we can be reasonably sure that the sister species of the relevant endemic also oc-

10 curs only east or west of the islands& These will be discussed here as well&

5 Wallace, 1859& The spe- cies occurs on Halmahera, Bacan, , and & The occurrence on Sanana 0 in the Sula archipelago, from where only a sin- 1234567 distribution type gle female is known, needs checking (Collins and Morris, 1985), but is almost certainly errone- Fig2 Distribution profiles for Halmahera and Seram The ous (Vane-Wright, pers& comm&, 1997)& The distribution types are numbered 1-7, meaning Halmahera or taxon is on the verge of specific distinctness Seram with: 1, Sulawesi; 2, Seram, respectively Halmahera; from O+ priamus (Linnaeus, 1758) (S Moluccas 3, New Guinea; 4, Sulawesi and Seram, respectively and New Guinea), and the two, together with O+ Halmahera; 5, Sulawesi and New Guinea; 6, New Guinea aesacus (Ney, 1903) (Obi) and O+ urvillianus and Seram, respectively Halmahera; 7, Halmahera, Seram, Sulawesi and New Guinea The frequency of the distribu- (Guérin-Méneville, 1830) (Bismarck archi- tion types is given as percentages of the fauna of Halmahera pelago, Bougainville, ), can be and Seram, respectively, without endemics considered to form a superspecies (Parsons, Halmahera and Seram butterfly faunas 321

1996)& Thus, biogeographically, O+ croesus is Halmahera) as sister, or the two taxa are linked with New Guinea (directly or through S conspecific& Its or their sister is G+ weiskei Ribbe, Moluccas), and not with Sulawesi& 1900 from southeastern New Guinea (or the Troides criton (C& and R& Felder, 1860)& Ac- whole of New Guinea; Collins and Morris 1985)& cording to Tsukada and Nishiyama (1980), T+ These taxa combined have as sister G+ criton (Halmahera, Bacan, Obi) forms an unre- macleayanum Leach, 1814 from E Australia, solved trichotomy with T+ plato Wallace, 1865 , Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island () and T+ haliphron (Boisduval, 1836) (extinct now, Holloway, pers& comm& 1997; re- (Sumba to Tanimbar, S Sulawesi)& Together they cently also known from New Guinea; Collins form an unresolved trichotomy with T+ riedeli and Morris, 1985), and sister to all these taxa is (Kirsch, 1885) (Tanimbar) and T+ vandepolli G+ gelon Boisduval, 1859 from New Caledonia& (Snellen, 1890) (, )& Although with Hypochrysops+ The genus includes 57 species the present distribution area of this group of in 20 species groups (Sands, 1986)& Except one species we must assume extinction in the species, H+ coelisparsus Butler, 1883, in S Thai- greater part of Sulawesi to understand how T+ land, Malaysia, Sumatra and some smaller is- criton could ever reach the northern Moluccas, lands, and a yet undescribed species from the absence of any related species in New Sulawesi, the genus is restricted to the Australian Guinea indicates that the link is to the west and region (including the Moluccas)& Six species are not to the east& endemic to the Moluccas& H+ chrysanthis C& deiphobus Linnaeus, 1758& According Felder, 1865, endemic to Seram and Ambon, to Tsukada and Nishiyama (1980) this wide- forms a species group together with H+ spread Moluccan endemic forms part of an unre- coelisparsus and an Australian species, and thus solved monophyletic group of seven species, has links to the west and to the east& All other distributed throughout the Oriental region, in- Moluccan species have only links to the east, cluding Sulawesi and the Lesser Sunda Islands except that further knowledge of the Sulawesi as far east as Timor& No relatives occur in New species may disturb this pattern& Guinea& Luthrodes+ This genus contains, in addition to Papilio heringi Niepelt, 1924& Hancock the Moluccan endemic, L+ buruana Holland, (1983) believes this endemic of Halmahera to be 1900 (Obi, Seram, Buru), only a single species in a natural hybrid between P+ tydeus (C& and R& New Guinea and surrounding islands, and in Felder, 1860) and P+ fuscus Goeze, 1779, Timor& whereas Racheli and Haugum (1983) reassessed Philiris+ A large genus of 63 species, mainly its specific status in accordance with Tsukada endemics of New Guinea, but one species is re- and Nishiyama (1980)& If considered a proper stricted to Seram and Ambon, and another to species, it belongs to a supposedly mono- Obi and S Moluccas; there are no species west phyletic group of eight species with a distribu- of the Moluccas& tion from the Moluccas eastward& In this case it Ariadne+ The Moluccas form the easternmost is clearly one of the New Guinea links of locality for this genus, which contains 10 spe- Halmahera& cies& The single Moluccan endemic, A+ obscura Papilio gambrisius Cramer, 1777 (S Mol- Felder, 1865, is found on Halmahera, Bacan and uccas), and P+ tydeus C& and R& Felder, 1860 (N Buru& Moluccas)& Hancock (1983) showed the two Mynes+ Another genus of 10 species, but this species (Fig&3) to be sister species& Together one does not occur west of the Moluccas (with they have as a sister species P+ aegeus Donovan, the exception of one species in Flores and 1805, which is distributed from New Guinea and Timor)& One Moluccan endemic, M+ plateni satellite islands to Australia and the Pacific& The Staudinger, 1877, occurs on Bacan and three species together have as sister group two Halmahera& species from the Solomon Islands and Admiralty Sumalia+ An Oriental genus of five species& Island, respectively& They all belong to the Although the genus does not occur in Sulawesi, aegeus group of nine species, which together the Moluccan endemic, S+ staudingeri Ribbe, have an eastern distribution; the Moluccas and 1898, from Seram and Ambon can have only islands around Tanimbar being the western out- western links& posts& Taenaris+ A typical genus (25 species) of the Graphium stresemanni Rothschild, 1916& This Papuan sub-region, with only a single species species is either an endemic of Seram, with G+ (T+ horsfieldii Swainson, 1820) in the Oriental batjanensis Okano, 1984 (Bacan and, probably, region (Malaysia, Java, , )& The 322 Rienk de Jong

Fig3 Phylogeny and distribution of the Papilio aegeus group (after Hancock, 1983) five Moluccan species belong to three species Moluccas (at least for those which occur in groups (Stichel, 1912), which have only repre- Halmahera or Seram), four show exclusively sentatives to the east of the Moluccas& western links, while 21 indicate a relationship Suniana& The three species in this genus are with New Guinea& Halmahera and Seram differ restricted to the Australian region, with one spe- slightly in the proportions: west-east scores 3-10 cies extending to Timor, and another to Sumba& for Halmahera, and 3-12 for Seram, but the num- One species, S+ subfasciata Rothschild 1915, is bers are too low to attach much meaning to& In endemic to Seram and Ambon& The second some cases, like Papilio gambrisius/tydeus, di- Moluccan species, S+ sunias Felder, 1860, is rect links between Halmahera and Seram are found in the N Moluccas, and as far east and apparent& These results reinforce the conclu- south as Fiji and New South Wales in Australia& sions based on similarity at the species level& For The genus is sister to another genus, all other endemics there is currently no clue as Ocybadistes, with similar distribution (de Jong, to the geographic link& 1990)& In addition to the genera dealt with here, there are other widespread genera which do not Patterns of endemism occur east of the Moluccas, but lack endemic species in the Moluccas, e+g+, Erionota, Iraota, Most of the 82 endemic Moluccan species occur Discolampa, Lethe& Similarly, there are a in two or more islands& The distribution is not number of eastern genera which do not occur random& Dividing the Moluccas into northern west of the Moluccas, but lack endemic species and southern groups of islands along a line be- in the Moluccas, e+g+, Netrocoryne, Hypochloro- tween Seram and Obi (as done by Vane-Wright sis, Praetaxilia, Eutraeropis, Apaturina, Teller- and Peggie, 1994), we find that 34 of the endem- vo+ The relevant species have been included in ics occur only in the northern islands, 47 only on the similarity assessments of the regional fau- the southern islands, and 12 species (14&6%) on nas& both sides of the dividing line& Moreover, four of In summary, of the endemic species of the the 12 widespread endemics occur north of the Halmahera and Seram butterfly faunas 323 line only in Obi, the southernmost island of the are potential sources for this kind of informa- northern group& The pattern of endemism, thus, tion, since they all have endemics in Halmahera, supports the division of the Moluccas into a Seram and New Guinea& Up to now, however, northern and a southern group& This agrees well the great morphological similarity in these gen- with the finding that the distribution pattern of era has frustrated attempts to analyse these taxa the Moluccan endemics is non-random& Appar- phylogenetically& ently, faunal interchange has been easier within the northern islands and within the southern is- lands, than it has been between these two island Halmahera arc pattern groups& Only five (13&9%) of the 36 endemic This pattern could either involve species or Moluccan species in Halmahera are restricted to monophyletic groups of species restricted to the this island& For Seram these figures are 6 (13&6%) former islands of the Halmahera arc (see ex- of the 44 endemic Moluccan species& Since there pected pattern C2)& As discussed in the previous are only eight endemics occurring in both paragraph, phylogenetic information is still too Halmahera and Seram, Halmahera has 28 meagre to be of much help& The author knows endemics not occurring in Seram, and Seram has of only one species with such a distribution, 36 endemics not occurring in Halmahera& This Euploea morosa Butler, 1866, which is found in strengthens the impression that the line between the northern Moluccas, Misool, Biak and Obi and Seram dividing the Moluccas into north- Numfoor& With eleven other Euploea species, ern and southern islands, is not imaginary& It is this species forms an almost completely unre- in agreement with expected pattern C6& solved monophyletic group (Ackery and Vane- Even if we suppose that all endemics occur- Wright, 1984)& The existence of only one species ring in Halmahera, except those also occurring (among the 196 species of Halmahera) showing in Seram, actually originated in Halmahera, and this pattern is considered insufficient evidence do the same for Seram, then Seram is still a for support& The nominate of richer centre of origin for endemics than Erysichton palmyra Felder, 1860 is found in the Halmahera& This agrees with the expected pat- N and S Moluccas, Numfoor and Biak, but the tern for faunas of comparable age, but differing species as a whole is widespread in the Papuan in diversity of habitats (see expected pattern and Australian regions, and its sub-specific dif- B2), and not with an older age for the ferentiation needs re-examination& Halmahera fauna&

Conclusions Phylogenetic patterns Despite distance and different histories, The little information available on the Halmahera and Seram have remarkably similar phylogeny of endemic species has already been butterfly faunas& This can be attributed to similar discussed above& The only case known in which positions relative to New Guinea and Sulawesi, a monophyletic group of three endemic species which acted as source areas& New Guinea, with can be distinguished, one in Halmahera, one in a much larger fauna than Sulawesi, contributed Seram, and the third in New Guinea (with possi- many more species& As shown by the pattern of ble extensions further south and east), is Papilio endemism within the Moluccan islands, direct gambrisius-tydeus-aegeus& Since the two exchange between the northern and southern Moluccan species are sister species, they have Moluccas apparently played a minor role& In the the same age& A comparable case could be butterfly fauna there are no traces evident of the Graphium stresemanni-batjanensis-weiskei, de- older history of Halmahera, but a number of pending on taxonomic decisions and exact dis- possibly informative genera have not yet been tributions& Therefore, there is no phylogenetic analysed phylogenetically& As far as available evidence of an older age for the Halmahera evidence goes, we can only conclude that endemics relative to the Seram endemics (see Halmahera remained submerged for most of its expected pattern B1)& Similarly, there is no evi- life and did not emerge before Seram, or traces dence for older connections between Seram and of an older butterfly fauna have been wiped out New Guinea than between Seram and Sulawesi by later immigrants& In both cases, the butterfly (see expected pattern C5)& The genera Delias, fauna of Halmahera, like that of Seram, is Arhopala, Hypochrysops, Jamides and Taenaris younger than that of New Guinea or Sulawesi& 324 Rienk de Jong

Consequently, exchange will have been largely fauna of the as exemplified by Coladenia unidirectional, i+e+, into the Moluccas, although Moore, 1881 (, Hesperiidae) Cladistics 12: 323-348 at a later stage exchange in the opposite direc- de Jong, R 1997b Fossil butterflies in phylogenetic per- tion may have taken place& With regard to the spective Entomologica Scandinavica: in press regional links of the faunas of the northern and de Jong, R and Congdon, T C E 1993 The montane but- southern Moluccas the conclusions generally terflies of the eastern Afrotropics In Biogeography and agree with those of Vane-Wright and Peggie ecology of the rain forests of eastern Africa Edited by J C Lovett and S K Wasser Cambridge University Press, (1994) who studied the butterflies of the whole Cambridge of the Moluccan islands with a different objec- de Jong, R and Treadaway, C G 1993 The Hesperiidae tive, and applied a slightly different approach& (Lepidoptera) of the Philippines Zoologische Verhande- lingen 288: 1-115 Fortuin, A R and de Smet, M E M 1991 Rates and magni- tudes of late Cenozoic vertical movements in the Indone- Acknowledgements sian Banda Arc and the distinction of eustatic effects Special Publications of the International Association of The author is grateful to the organisers of the Sedimentology 12: 79-89 meeting on the Biogeography and Geological Gressitt, J L 1982 Zoogeographic summary In Biogeogra- Evolution of SE Asia in London, March 6-7, 1996, phy and ecology of New Guinea Edited by J L Gressitt Junk, The Hague for the opportunity to read a paper there and to Hall, R 1987 Plate boundary evolution in the Halmahera have it published in the present volume& He region, Indonesia Tectonophysics 144: 337-352 wants to acknowledge the long-standing co-op- Hall, R 1996 Reconstructing Cenozoic SE Asia In Tectonic eration with R& I& Vane-Wright in the study of SE Evolution of  Edited by R Hall and D Blundell Geological Society Special Publication, 106: Asian butterflies, and he thanks R& I& Vane- 153-184 Wright and N& Møller Andersen for fruitful com- Hall, R 1998 The plate tectonics of Cenozoic SE Asia and ments on the manuscript& the distribution of land and sea In Biogeography and Geological Evolution of SE Asia Edited by R Hall and J D Holloway (this volume) Hall, R and Nichols, G J 1990 Terrane amalgamation in References the margin Tectonophysics 181: 207-222 Hall, R, Ali, J R Anderson, C D and Baker, S J 1995 Ackery, P R and Vane-Wright, R I 1984 Milkweed butter- Origin and motion history of the Philippine Sea Plate flies, their cladistics and biology British Museum (Natu- Tectonophysics 251: 229-250 ral History), London Hancock, D L 1983 Princeps aegeus (Donovan) and its Audley-Charles, M G 1986 Timor-Tanimbar Trough: the allies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): systematics, phylog- foreland basin of the evolving Banda orogen Special eny and biogeography Australian Journal of Zoology 31: Publications: International Association of Sedimentolo- 771-197 gists 8: 91-102 Krebs, C J 1989 Ecological Methodology Harper and Row, Audley-Charles, M G 1993 Geological evidence bearing New York upon the emergence of Seram, an island colo- Page, R D M 1993 COMPONENT, version 20 Computer nizable by land plants and animals In Natural History of program and manual Natural History Museum, London Seram Edited by I D Edwards, A A Macdonald and J Parsons, M J 1996 Gondwanan evolution of the troidine Proctor Intercept Ltd, Andover swallowtails (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae): cladistic reap- Boer, A J de 1995 Islands and cicadas adrift in the West- praisals using mainly immature stage characters, with fo- Pacific Biogeographic patterns related to plate tectonics cus on the birdwings Ornithoptera Boisduval Bulletin Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 138: 169-244 Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History 15: 43-118 Bowler, J and Taylor, J 1993 The avifauna of Seram In Pigram, C J and P J Davies 1987 Terranes and the accre- Natural History of Seram Edited by I D Edwards, A A tion history of the New Guinea orogen BMR Journal of Macdonald and J Proctor Intercept Ltd, Andover Australian Geology and Geophysics 10: 193-212 Collins, N M and Morris, M G 1985 Threatened Swallow- Pigram, C J and H Panggabean, 1984 Rifting of the north- tail Butterflies of the World IUCN, Gland and Cam- ern margin of the Australian continent and the origin of bridge some microcontinents in eastern Indonesia Tectono- Croizat, L 1962 Space, Time and Form, the biological syn- physics 107: 331-353 thesis Published by the author, Caracas Racheli, T and Haugum, J 1983 On the status of Papilio Daly, M C, Cooper, M A, Wilson, I, Smith, D G and heringi Niepelt, 1924 Papilio International 1: 37-45 Hooper, B G D 1991 Cenozoic plate tectonics and ba- Rangin, G, Jolivet, L and Pubellier, M 1990 A simple mod- sin evolution in Indonesia Marine and Petroleum Geolo- el for the tectonic evolution of the southeast Asia and gy 8: 1-21 Indonesia region for the past 43 my Bulletin de la So- de Jong, R 1990 Some aspects of the biogeography of the ciété géologique de France 8 (6): 889-905 Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of Sulawesi In Sands, D P A 1986 A revision of the genus Hypochrysops and the Rain Forests of South (Walla- C and R Felder Entomonograph 7  E J Brill/Scandina- cea) Edited by W J Knight, and J D Holloway RESL, vian Science Press, Leiden, Copenhagen London Stichel, H 1912 Amathusiidae In Das Tierreich Vol 34 de Jong, R 1997a The continental Asian element in the Edited by F E Schulze R Friedlènder und Sohn, Berlin Halmahera and Seram butterfly faunas 325

Struckmeyer, H I M, Young, M and Pigram, C J 1993 E Tsukada Plapac Co, Ltd, Tokyo (Japanese edition; Mesozoic to Cainozoic plate tectonic and palaeographic English edition 1982) evolution of the New Guinea region In Petroleum Ex- Vane-Wright, R I and Peggie, D 1994 The butterflies of ploration and Development in Papua New Guinea Pro- Northern and Central Maluku: diversity, endemism, bio- ceedings of the Second PNG Petroleum Convention, Port geography, and conservation priorities Tropical Biodi- Moresby 1993 pp 261-290 Edited by G J and Z Car- versity 2: 212-230 man Vives Moreno, A 1994 Catalogo sistematico y sinonimico Tennent, J 1996 The Butterflies of Morocco, Algeria and de los lepidopteros de la Peninsula Iberica y Baleares Tunisia Gem Publishing Company, Brightwell cum (Insecta: Lepidoptera) (Segunda Parte) Ministerio di Ag- Sotwell, Wallingford ricultura, Madrid Tsukada, E and Nishiyama, Y 1980 Papilionidae In But- Wallace, A R 1869  MacMillan, terflies of the South East Asian Islands Vol I Edited by London 326 Rienk de Jong