Muuglines the Manitoba UNIX User Group Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Plasma on Mobile Devices
Plasma on Mobile devices Application Ecosystem MC Bhushan Shah KDE Developer Agenda ● Initial development of the Plasma Mobile ● Basic architecture details ● Advantages to KDE community ● Application ecosystem and development ● Future for Plasma Mobile ● Challenges Introduction ● KDE developer and sysadmin ● Plasma Mobile maintainer and lead developer ● Employed by Bluesystems GmbH ● From Vadodara, India KDE ● Previously known as the K Desktop Environment ● Now community, which creates free software for end users ● Several products including Plasma, KDE Frameworks, KDE applications. Plasma Mobile ● Announced in the July 2015 ● Vision of providing completely free and open-source mobile platform which respects user’s privacy and freedom. ● Initial prototype on the LG Nexus 5. Initial Development ● LGE Nexus 5 as reference device ● Ubuntu Touch 15.04 (vivid) as base system ● Makes use of the Android binary blobs / drivers ● Can also run on the desktop system for development Basic architecture details ● KWin wayland as compositor ● DRM/GBM or hwcomposer backends ● plasmashell and mobile shell package ● QtQuickControls2 and Kirigami for application development Advantages to KDE community ● Several performance improvements ● Better touch input support in applications and shell ● Improvements in Wayland support ● More modular and re-usable user interfaces Application ecosystem and development ● QtQuickControls2 and Kirigami as toolkit ● CMake/QMake as a buildsystem ● Various bundle formats as well as native distribution packaging for the distribution -
Download Android Os for Phone Open Source Mobile OS Alternatives to Android
download android os for phone Open Source Mobile OS Alternatives To Android. It’s no exaggeration to say that open source operating systems rule the world of mobile devices. Android is still an open-source project, after all. But, due to the bundle of proprietary software that comes along with Android on consumer devices, many people don’t consider it an open source operating system. So, what are the alternatives to Android? iOS? Maybe, but I am primarily interested in open-source alternatives to Android. I am going to list not one, not two, but several alternatives, Linux-based mobile OSes . Top Open Source alternatives to Android (and iOS) Let’s see what open source mobile operating systems are available. Just to mention, the list is not in any hierarchical or chronological order . 1. Plasma Mobile. A few years back, KDE announced its open source mobile OS, Plasma Mobile. Plasma Mobile is the mobile version of the desktop Plasma user interface, and aims to provide convergence for KDE users. It is being actively developed, and you can even find PinePhone running on Manjaro ARM while using KDE Plasma Mobile UI if you want to get your hands on a smartphone. 2. postmarketOS. PostmarketOS (pmOS for short) is a touch-optimized, pre-configured Alpine Linux with its own packages, which can be installed on smartphones. The idea is to enable a 10-year life cycle for smartphones. You probably already know that, after a few years, Android and iOS stop providing updates for older smartphones. At the same time, you can run Linux on older computers easily. -
Open Hardware: Pureos and Arduino
Published on Tux Machines (http://www.tuxmachines.org) Home > content > Open Hardware: PureOS and Arduino Open Hardware: PureOS and Arduino By Rianne Schestowitz Created 07/01/2021 - 7:39am Submitted by Rianne Schestowitz on Thursday 7th of January 2021 07:39:57 AM Filed under Hardware [1] PureOS: freedom, privacy, and security [2] A recent blog post from Purism?the company that developed PureOS to run on its security- focused hardware?celebrates three years of FSF endorsement of the Linux distribution. While this endorsement is an achievement that is not as highly valued by our communities as one might think, the work done to obtain and maintain that endorsement is useful even to those who disdain the FSF or disagree with its definition of what makes a distribution "free". While Purism and PureOS have been on our radar for a few years now, it seems worth a look at where things have gone with the distribution?and the company behind it. The blog post notes that PureOS and Purism "sit on a three-legged stool of Freedom, Privacy and Security". The three are intertwined, of course, since PureOS consisting of only free software allows users to ensure there are no antifeatures being slipped into the OS or applications that would impact their privacy or security. Beyond that, free software is an excellent defense against various software supply-chain attacks; in addition the scrutiny of the code afforded to free software, it can also be built in a manner that provides more security... [...] As might be guessed, security and privacy features do not come for free?or even inexpensively. -
Free Software As Commons
FREE SOFTWARE AS COMMONS BETWEEN INFORMATIONAL CAPITALISM AND A NEW MODE OF PRODUCTION By Emrah Irzık Submitted to Central European University Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Professor Jakob Rigi CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2015 Statement I hereby state that the thesis contains no material accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. The thesis contains no materials previously written and/or published by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgment is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Emrah Irzık Budapest, November 2015 CEU eTD Collection Abstract Free Software is a particular way of organizing the production and distribution of software that offers a solid alternative to the intellectual property regime by constituting an open commons: non-proprietary, created and held in common by all. Considering that in contemporary capitalism a significant amount of wealth is created through the application of intellectual effort to existing knowledge to produce new, higher compositions of knowledge that can be privately monetized as intellectual property, the challenge that Free Software might present to capitalism is bound to have important transformational potential. This potential needs to be studied both on an empirical level, in its partial and concrete manifestations in actual projects, and investigated more theoretically, to see if Free Software can be characterized as a nascent, new mode of production. This dissertation aims to contribute to the theorization of the relation between Free Software as a commons and the tenets of informational capitalism by means of an analytical study that is supported by an ethnography of a particular instance of Free Software as a project and a community. -
Debian \ Amber \ Arco-Debian \ Arc-Live \ Aslinux \ Beatrix
Debian \ Amber \ Arco-Debian \ Arc-Live \ ASLinux \ BeatriX \ BlackRhino \ BlankON \ Bluewall \ BOSS \ Canaima \ Clonezilla Live \ Conducit \ Corel \ Xandros \ DeadCD \ Olive \ DeMuDi \ \ 64Studio (64 Studio) \ DoudouLinux \ DRBL \ Elive \ Epidemic \ Estrella Roja \ Euronode \ GALPon MiniNo \ Gibraltar \ GNUGuitarINUX \ gnuLiNex \ \ Lihuen \ grml \ Guadalinex \ Impi \ Inquisitor \ Linux Mint Debian \ LliureX \ K-DEMar \ kademar \ Knoppix \ \ B2D \ \ Bioknoppix \ \ Damn Small Linux \ \ \ Hikarunix \ \ \ DSL-N \ \ \ Damn Vulnerable Linux \ \ Danix \ \ Feather \ \ INSERT \ \ Joatha \ \ Kaella \ \ Kanotix \ \ \ Auditor Security Linux \ \ \ Backtrack \ \ \ Parsix \ \ Kurumin \ \ \ Dizinha \ \ \ \ NeoDizinha \ \ \ \ Patinho Faminto \ \ \ Kalango \ \ \ Poseidon \ \ MAX \ \ Medialinux \ \ Mediainlinux \ \ ArtistX \ \ Morphix \ \ \ Aquamorph \ \ \ Dreamlinux \ \ \ Hiwix \ \ \ Hiweed \ \ \ \ Deepin \ \ \ ZoneCD \ \ Musix \ \ ParallelKnoppix \ \ Quantian \ \ Shabdix \ \ Symphony OS \ \ Whoppix \ \ WHAX \ LEAF \ Libranet \ Librassoc \ Lindows \ Linspire \ \ Freespire \ Liquid Lemur \ Matriux \ MEPIS \ SimplyMEPIS \ \ antiX \ \ \ Swift \ Metamorphose \ miniwoody \ Bonzai \ MoLinux \ \ Tirwal \ NepaLinux \ Nova \ Omoikane (Arma) \ OpenMediaVault \ OS2005 \ Maemo \ Meego Harmattan \ PelicanHPC \ Progeny \ Progress \ Proxmox \ PureOS \ Red Ribbon \ Resulinux \ Rxart \ SalineOS \ Semplice \ sidux \ aptosid \ \ siduction \ Skolelinux \ Snowlinux \ srvRX live \ Storm \ Tails \ ThinClientOS \ Trisquel \ Tuquito \ Ubuntu \ \ A/V \ \ AV \ \ Airinux \ \ Arabian -
2022 Brand Association List
Last updated: 9/9/21 Brand Association List Below is the list of brands used in the 2022 Tier Assignment Schedule for Washington’s Electronic Product Recycling Program. Brands are associated with the responsible manufacturer. The manufacturers listed are those Ecology has identified as the brand owners of electronic products covered by this program (computers, monitors, laptops, televisions, portable DVD players, and tablets). Is Your Registration Up to Date? • Manufacturers who own additional brands of covered electronic products not currently registered must add those brands to their registration. • Brand owners of covered electronic products that are not on this list must register as a new participant. • Access your registration by going to our webpage for manufacturers and clicking “Submit my annual registration.” If you have questions, please contact Christine Haun at [email protected]. Brand Manufacturer 4th Dimension Computer 4th Dimension Computer Abacus Abacus Office Machines Accuvision QubicaAMF Acer Acer America Corp ADEK ADEK Industrial Computers ADT ADT LLC dba ADT Security Services AEEZO AEEZO AFUNTA Afunta LLC AG Neovo AG Neovo Technology Corp Ainol Shen Zhen Ainol Electronics Co.,Ltd alcatel TCT Mobile, Inc Alcatel one touch TCT Mobile, Inc Alden 3MD Inc. Alienware Dell Computer Corp ALLDAYMALL iGaming Amazon Kindle Amazon.com Services LLC Amazon Kindle Fire Amazon.com Services LLC American Dynamics Sensormatic Electronics LLC Angel Computer Systems Angel Computer Systems Inc AOC Envision Peripherals Inc AOpen Acer America Corp Last updated: 9/9/21 AORUS Gigabyte aoson Shenzhen Luckystar Technology Co., Ltd Apeman APEMAN APEMAN APEMAN APM Localtel Communications Apple Apple ARM Electronics Tri-Ed / Northern Video Distribution Aspect Hitachi America, LTD Digital Solutions Division Aspire Acer America Corp Astro Queo Inspira Technologies LLC Astro Tab Inspira Technologies LLC ASUS Asus Computer International ATOAH SINGREEN INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION LTD ATYME Atyme Corporation, Inc. -
Master Thesis Innovation Dynamics in Open Source Software
Master thesis Innovation dynamics in open source software Author: Name: Remco Bloemen Student number: 0109150 Email: [email protected] Telephone: +316 11 88 66 71 Supervisors and advisors: Name: prof. dr. Stefan Kuhlmann Email: [email protected] Telephone: +31 53 489 3353 Office: Ravelijn RA 4410 (STEPS) Name: dr. Chintan Amrit Email: [email protected] Telephone: +31 53 489 4064 Office: Ravelijn RA 3410 (IEBIS) Name: dr. Gonzalo Ord´o~nez{Matamoros Email: [email protected] Telephone: +31 53 489 3348 Office: Ravelijn RA 4333 (STEPS) 1 Abstract Open source software development is a major driver of software innovation, yet it has thus far received little attention from innovation research. One of the reasons is that conventional methods such as survey based studies or patent co-citation analysis do not work in the open source communities. In this thesis it will be shown that open source development is very accessible to study, due to its open nature, but it requires special tools. In particular, this thesis introduces the method of dependency graph analysis to study open source software devel- opment on the grandest scale. A proof of concept application of this method is done and has delivered many significant and interesting results. Contents 1 Open source software 6 1.1 The open source licenses . 8 1.2 Commercial involvement in open source . 9 1.3 Opens source development . 10 1.4 The intellectual property debates . 12 1.4.1 The software patent debate . 13 1.4.2 The open source blind spot . 15 1.5 Litterature search on network analysis in software development . -
Purism's FSP Reverse Engineering Effort Might Be Stalled
ARTICLES & REVIEWS NEWS ARCHIVE FORUMS PREMIUM CATEGORIES Custom Search Search Latest Linux News Purism's FSP Reverse Engineering Effort Might Be Stalled Radeon EQAA Anti-Aliasing Support Merged To Mesa 18.2 Purism's FSP Reverse Engineering Effort Might Be Stalled Purism's Librem 15 v2 Laptop Now Written by Michael Larabel in Hardware on 11 May 2018 at 09:18 AM EDT. 2 Comments Supported By Mainline Coreboot Purism has been working on reverse-engineering the Intel Firmware Support AMD Kaveri Gets A Big Performance Boost Package (FSP) module but it looks like that work may have taken a turn. With Mesa 18.2 & AMDGPU DRM Red Hat Summit 2018 Wraps Up With A Phoronix reader tipped us off this morning that the Intel FSP reverse- Containers/Virtualization Still Being Hot engineering information made public by Purism has now been retracted. The Purism Shows Off Latest GNOME Mobile past several months Purism has been working on reverse-engineering the Shell Mockups For The Librem 5 Intel FSP to free the system further to run on only open-source code rather than still having GNOME 3.28.2 Released With GJS Garbage the Intel binary-only module paired with Coreboot. Their big focus this year has been on Collection Fix To Address The Big Memory figuring out the actual silicon initialization code inside the FSP. Purism's Youness Alaoui was Leak very close to finding out this information at the start of April and he wrote a lengthy blog post outlining his reverse-engineering work. Radeon Pro Software 18.Q2 Released For Linux But as we were informed this morning by a sharp-eyed reader, that post has now been Rust 1.26 Continues With Speed removed: Improvements, Adds Support For 128-Bit Integers 2018-04-23 update: after receiving a courtesy request from Intel’s Director of Software Infrastructure, we have decided to remove this post’s technical contents X.Org Server 1.20 "Avocado Toast" Released while we investigate our options. -
Ethereum Homestead Documentation Release 0.1
Ethereum Homestead Documentation Release 0.1 Ethereum community Oct 08, 2017 Contents 1 Contenido 3 1.1 Introduccion.............................................3 1.1.1 ¿Que es Ethereum?.....................................3 1.1.1.1 Una red blockchain de siguiente Generacion...................3 1.1.1.2 La Maquina Virtual de Ethereum o “EVM”....................4 1.1.1.3 ¿Como funciona Ethereum?............................4 1.1.2 How to use this guide?...................................6 1.1.2.1 Using Ethereum: The Basics...........................6 1.1.3 The Homestead Release..................................6 1.1.3.1 Milestones of the Ethereum development roadmap................6 1.1.3.2 Homestead hard fork changes...........................7 1.1.4 Web 3: A platform for decentralized apps.........................8 1.1.4.1 Smart contracts..................................8 1.1.4.2 DAO........................................8 1.1.5 History of Ethereum....................................9 1.1.5.1 Inception......................................9 1.1.5.2 The Ethereum Foundation and the ether presale.................9 1.1.5.3 ETH/DEV and Ethereum development......................9 1.1.5.4 The Ethereum Frontier launch........................... 10 1.1.6 Community......................................... 11 1.1.6.1 Reddit....................................... 11 1.1.6.2 Stack Exchange.................................. 12 1.1.6.3 Gitter Rooms................................... 12 1.1.6.4 Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs)..................... 12 1.1.6.5 Meetups...................................... 13 1.1.6.6 Obsolete...................................... 13 1.1.7 The Ethereum Foundation................................. 13 1.1.7.1 Ethereum Foundation’s faces to the community................. 13 1.1.8 Contributors......................................... 14 1.2 Clientes Ethereum.......................................... 16 1.2.1 Choosing a client...................................... 16 1.2.1.1 Why are there multiple Ethereum clients?................... -
The Intel Management Engine: an Attack on Computer Users' Freedom by Denis Gnutoo Carikli
A statement by FSF President Richard Stallman on the Intel Management Engine (ME): "Meltdown and Spectre are errors. Grave errors, to be sure, but not evidently malicious. Everyone makes mistakes. Intel has done far worse with its CPUs than make a mistake. It has built in an intentional back door called the Management Engine. Important as these bugs are, don©t let Intel©s mistakes distract you from Intel©s deliberate attack!" The Intel Management Engine: an attack on computer users© freedom By Denis GNUtoo Carikli With security issues like the Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities (https://www.cnet.com/news/meltdown-spectre-intel-ceo-no-recall-chip-processor/) discovered in Intel chips in early 2018, it became more important than ever to talk about the necessity of software freedom in these deeply embedded technologies. Serious as though these bugs may be, we cannot let them distract us from the broader issues: Intel considers the Intel Management Engine a feature, while it©s nothing more than a threat to user freedom. Thanks to Denis GNUtoo Carikli, we have a new basis for that conversation in this article. The Intel Management Engine is a tool that ships with Intel chipsets, purportedly to ease the job of system administrators. But in reality, it is another restriction on user freedoms, imposed by a company, and used to control your computing. Carikli offers a moderately technical explanation of what©s happening with Management Engine, the ways in which it restricts rather than empowers users, and how it violates the four freedoms of free software. Carikli may be best known for his work on the Replicant project (https://www.replicant.us/), which he co-founded with Aaron Williamson, Bradley Kuhn, and Grazlano Sorbaioli. -
A New Generation of Linux-Only
Newsdesk THIS ISSUE: Linux-exclusive PCs Linus Torvalds has doubts Microsoft protects Linux severs Steam on Chromebooks HARDWARE SYSTEMS A new generation of Dell Linux-only PCs CREDIT: It’s the year of Linux on some desktops – perhaps this whole FOSS thing will catch on! omething unusual is happening in the output supporting 4K at world of computing: companies big and 60Hz it’s ideal for use as a S small are releasing PCs with Linux media centre system, but running on them. Crucially, in these cases a Linux would run well as either a The Dell XPS 13 Developer operating systems being the only OS option. mini-destop or mini-server. Edition is an Ubuntu-only model. This shows an operational change in the Juno Computers, based both in the UK and marketplace, demonstrating that companies are the US, has made us aware of its all-new gaming not only confident that Linux-only models can laptop, the Neptune 15, that can be bought either sell in enough volume to make money, but that with Ubuntu 20.04 pre-installed, or no OS at all3. they’re happy to support those devices. It’s one It’s powered by the latest Intel Core i7-10875H thing to offer variations of existing Windows eight-core processor and runs a high-end Nvidia models, but quite another to only build a model GeForce RTX 2060 GPU with 6GB of GDDR6. At that offers Linux. £1,650 it’s one powerful – if expensive – system. We reported in LXF265 that Lenovo has We could argue that this trend, in part, extended its Ubuntu certification, making it able coincides with figures that show during the to offer Ubuntu pre-installed on a wider range of its Workstation offerings. -
Debian: 19 Years and Counting
Debian: 19 years and counting Stefano Zacchiroli Debian Project Leader 25 June 2012 Debian for Scientific Facilities Days European Synchrotron Radiation Facility Grenoble, France Stefano Zacchiroli (Debian) Debian: 19 years and counting ESRF, Grenoble 1 / 29 Outline 1 Debian and Wheezy 2 Specialties 3 Derivatives 4 Contribute Stefano Zacchiroli (Debian) Debian: 19 years and counting ESRF, Grenoble 2 / 29 Prelude — the notion of “distribution” distributions are meant to ease software management key notion: the abstraction of package offer coherent collections of software killer application: package managers Stefano Zacchiroli (Debian) Debian: 19 years and counting ESRF, Grenoble 3 / 29 Outline 1 Debian and Wheezy 2 Specialties 3 Derivatives 4 Contribute Stefano Zacchiroli (Debian) Debian: 19 years and counting ESRF, Grenoble 4 / 29 Debian: once upon a time Fellow Linuxers, This is just to announce the imminent completion of a brand-new Linux release, which I’m calling the Debian Linux Release. [. ] Ian A Murdock, 16/08/1993 comp.os.linux.development make GNU/Linux competitive with commercial OS easy to install built collaboratively by software experts 1st major distro developed “openly in the spirit of GNU” FSF-supported for a while Stefano Zacchiroli (Debian) Debian: 19 years and counting ESRF, Grenoble 5 / 29 Debian: the operating system flagship product: Debian stable binary distribution Source packages Binary packages 30000 completely Free (DFSG) 25000 released every 24 months (≈) 20000 15000 a dozen architectures 10000 archive-wide security support 5000 0 (3-3.5 years) 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.0 3.1 4.0 5.0 6.0 renowned for one of the largest GNU/Linux ports, stability, packaging system, porting platforms old hardware support, documentation, smooth upgrades, i18n/l10n, the testing suite, runs anywhere, technical policy, package choice, .