DOCSLIB.ORG

672 15 SD03 Business Case Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
672 15 SD03 Business Case Template ENVIMSE500177 Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme Outline Business Case Version No: 1.2 Date: 13/06/2017 Crown Copyright Version No: 1.2 Date: 13/06/2017 Author: Jane Birks, Richard Harding, Scott Lawrance, Emma Formoy and CH2M. 1 FINANCIAL SCHEME OF DELEGATION (FSoD) APPROVALS 1. Project name Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme Project ref. Project Code ENVIMSE500177 Start date January 2014 Programme End date July 2027 Hub or Head South For FSOD use only Office Area name Thames FSoD reference Function FCRM FSoD Date 2. % time allocated to Role Name Post Title project Project Sponsor Julia Simpson Deputy Director - Thames 5% Project Director Joanna Larmour Project Director 80% Project Executive Richard Harding Project Executive 80% Project Manager Heather Taylor / Jane Birks Project Manager 100% 3. Risk Potential Assessment (RPA) Category Low Medium High 4. Delegation FSoD schedule Description National – up to Area – up to A1 Projects (includes FCRM revenue) £5m £5m A2 FCRM capital project within approved strategy £100m WLC Defra £10m A3 FCRM capital project outside of approved strategy £100m WLC Defra £5m A5 Consultancy project £500k £500k T2 Corporate Property Projects /acquisitions £5m £5m 5. FSoD value £k Form A FSoD reference F/1516/0122 4,164 Strategic Outline Case (SOC) FSoD reference N/A N/A Full Business Case (FBC) FSoD reference N/A N/A Whole Life Costs (WLC) of Project £286.92m Financial benefits (PV) £1,112.4m Non-financial benefits Yes 6. N/A Low Medium High Required level of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) 7. NPAS/LPRG chair Post title Assurance confirmation Date RED AMBER GREEN 8. FSoD approver(s) name Post title Emailed approval Date 9. Latest FSoD authorised cost Form G Form G value (£k) FSoD ref. (£k) 1 £865k F/1516/0435 5,029 2 £6,933k F/1617/0324 11,962 3 Crown Copyright Version No: 1.2 Date: 13/06/2017 Author: Jane Birks, Richard Harding, Scott Lawrance, Emma Formoy and CH2M. 2 10. For FSoD Coordinator use only: Crown Copyright Version No: 1.2 Date: 13/06/2017 Author: Jane Birks, Richard Harding, Scott Lawrance, Emma Formoy and CH2M. 3 Table of contents 1. Executive summary ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Strategic case ................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3. Economic case ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.4. Commercial case ............................................................................................................................ 17 1.5. Financial case ................................................................................................................................ 21 1.6. Management case .......................................................................................................................... 25 1.7. Recommendation ........................................................................................................................... 32 2. Strategic Case ....................................................................................................................................... 34 2.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 34 2.2. Business strategies ........................................................................................................................ 34 2.3. Environmental and other considerations ........................................................................................ 40 2.4. Investment objectives ..................................................................................................................... 41 2.5. Current arrangements .................................................................................................................... 43 2.6. Main benefits .................................................................................................................................. 47 2.7. Main risks ....................................................................................................................................... 49 2.8. Constraints ..................................................................................................................................... 52 2.9. Dependencies ................................................................................................................................ 53 3. Economic Case ..................................................................................................................................... 54 3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 54 3.2. Critical success factors (CSFs) ...................................................................................................... 54 3.3. Long list options ............................................................................................................................. 56 3.4. Short list options ............................................................................................................................. 61 3.5. Economic appraisal ........................................................................................................................ 79 3.6. Non-financial benefits appraisal ..................................................................................................... 88 3.7. Preferred option .............................................................................................................................. 88 3.8. Risk appraisal ................................................................................................................................. 88 3.9. Partnership funding calculator ........................................................................................................ 90 3.10. Impacts of climate change.............................................................................................................. 90 3.11. Sensitivity analysis ......................................................................................................................... 91 4. Commercial Case .................................................................................................................................. 94 4.1. Introduction and procurement strategy .......................................................................................... 94 4.2. Key contractual terms and risk allocation ....................................................................................... 97 4.3. Procurement route and timescales .............................................................................................. 103 4.4. Efficiencies, opportunities and commercial issues ....................................................................... 105 5. Financial Case ..................................................................................................................................... 108 5.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 108 5.2. Financial summary ....................................................................................................................... 108 5.3. Funding approach ........................................................................................................................ 112 5.4. Secured contributions towards the scheme ................................................................................. 113 5.5. Balance sheet and affordability position ....................................................................................... 115 6. Management Case .............................................................................................................................. 117 6.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 117 6.2. Project management .................................................................................................................... 117 6.3. Change management and project control .................................................................................... 123 6.4. Risk management ........................................................................................................................ 126 6.5. Communications and stakeholder engagement ........................................................................... 127 6.6. Planning and consents ................................................................................................................. 131 6.7. Early works and preparatory works .............................................................................................. 132 6.8. Benefits realisation ....................................................................................................................... 132 6.9. Contract management .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From South Hinksey Parish Plan Progress Report, April 2006
    from www.southhinksey.co.uk South Hinksey Parish Plan Progress Report, April 2006 Action 1: Reduce A34 Probably the most requested action. This is constantly under road noise. discussion, with little success so far. Action 2: Improve safety The Parish Council now participate in the local transport group at slip-roads to with the police and neighbouring councils. The Chair of our A34 Parish Council has been very active in putting forward our concerns. Action 3: Reduce traffic New road markings on the Hill have not really solved the speed on Hinksey problem. Cats-eyes in the road have simply created a new Hill noise problem as large vehicles have to rumble over them. Action 4: Reduce the risk The Flood group has made progress with action taken by the of flooding railway authority to clear drain blockages and clearance of ditches and underground pipes in the village. In the last very heavy downpour there was no flooding in the village. Unfortunately the proposed bund around the village has been abandoned because the Environment Agency could not justify the high expenditure. Action 5: Improve and We have managed to get limited road repairs done in the repair roads, pavements village. Cutting back of overhanging hedges and removal of and footpaths litter particularly on Hinksey Hill has also been done. More pavement and road repairs are needed. Action 6: Improve parking Parking in the village has actually become more of a problem in the village since the pub car park has been fenced off. We are still working on this. Action 7: Upgrade bridge Network Rail have agreed to construct a "Wheelie ramp" on to New Hinksey to the Devil’s Backbone bridge improve cycle access Action 8: Create new We are working with Sustrans, the national cycle network, on cycling and walking establishing new cycle trails throughout the parish.
    [Show full text]
  • NR05 Oxford TWAO
    OFFICIAL Rule 10(2)(d) Transport and Works Act 1992 The Transport and Works (Applications and Objections Procedure) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order 202X Report summarising consultations undertaken 1 Introduction 1.1 Network Rail Infrastructure Limited ('Network Rail') is making an application to the Secretary of State for Transport for an order under the Transport and Works Act 1992. The proposed order is termed the Network Rail (Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements (Land Only)) Order ('the Order'). 1.2 The purpose of the Order is to facilitate improved capacity and capability on the “Oxford Corridor” (Didcot North Junction to Aynho Junction) to meet the Strategic Business Plan objections for capacity enhancement and journey time improvements. As well as enhancements to rail infrastructure, improvements to highways are being undertaken as part of the works. Together, these form part of Oxford Station Phase 2 Improvements ('the Project'). 1.3 The Project forms part of a package of rail enhancement schemes which deliver significant economic and strategic benefits to the wider Oxford area and the country. The enhanced infrastructure in the Oxford area will provide benefits for both freight and passenger services, as well as enable further schemes in this strategically important rail corridor including the introduction of East West Rail services in 2024. 1.4 The works comprised in the Project can be summarised as follows: • Creation of a new ‘through platform’ with improved passenger facilities. • A new station entrance on the western side of the railway. • Replacement of Botley Road Bridge with improvements to the highway, cycle and footways.
    [Show full text]
  • Ttu Mac001 000057.Pdf (19.52Mb)
    (Vlatthew flrnold. From the pn/ture in tlic Oriel Coll. Coniinon liooni, O.vford. Jhc Oxford poems 0[ attfiew ("Jk SAoUi: S'ips\i' ani "Jli\j«'vs.'') Illustrated, t© which are added w ith the storv of Ruskin's Roa(d makers. with Glides t© the Country the p©em5 iljystrate. Portrait, Ordnance Map, and 76 Photographs. by HENRY W. TAUNT, F.R.G.S. Photographer to the Oxford Architectural anid Historical Society. and Author of the well-knoi^rn Guides to the Thames. &c., 8cc. OXFORD: Henry W, Taunl ^ Co ALI. RIGHTS REStHVED. xji^i. TAONT & CO. ART PRINTERS. OXFORD The best of thanks is ren(iered by the Author to his many kind friends, -who by their information and assistance, have materially contributed to the successful completion of this little ^rork. To Mr. James Parker, -who has translated Edwi's Charter and besides has added notes of the greatest value, to Mr. Herbert Hurst for his details and additions and placing his collections in our hands; to Messrs Macmillan for the very courteous manner in which they smoothed the way for the use of Arnold's poems; to the Provost of Oriel Coll, for Arnold's portrait; to Mr. Madan of the Bodleian, for suggestions and notes, to the owners and occupiers of the various lands over which •we traversed to obtain some of the scenes; to the Vicar of New Hinksey for details, and to all who have helped with kindly advice, our best and many thanks are given. It is a pleasure when a ^ivork of this kind is being compiled to find so many kind friends ready to help.
    [Show full text]
  • Enough Is Enough! Stop Oxford Flooding(4)+Caveat
    Enough is Enough! Stop Oxford Flooding Caveat and disclaimer: this article is written in good faith as our best understanding at the time of writing, March 2014. However very little is decided for sure, and things can and will change, the scheme may never even happen, so nothing said here should be taken as gospel or relied on for taking important decisions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Oxford Flood Alliance has been campaigning since 2007 to reduce Oxford’s flood risk. We have had real success but have always known that more would need to be done. Here are the reasons why we strongly support the proposed “Western Conveyance” What follows is based on our best understanding at present. There are several years of planning ahead before work on the ground begins. Something needs to be done to reduce Oxford’s flooding Oxford has suffered increasingly frequent flooding in recent years, a problem which is only likely to increase in future. There are serious effects on individuals, families, businesses, the universities, railways and roads, and the sewerage system. Oxford and Oxfordshire’s economy is damaged, along with its reputation as a place to work and to do business. Action needs to be taken to rid Oxford of this threat once and for all. We support the proposed Western Conveyance (also known as the Oxford Relief River, ORR). This is a scheme devised by the Environment Agency and the subject of public consultation in 2009. If various bodies can together in partnership raise the necessary £123 million, it is likely to be given the go ahead next month.
    [Show full text]
  • Kennington Lawns Local Information Handbook
    GREEN = factual corrections PH 5 Nov 2019 Kennington Lawns Local Information Handbook Welcome to The Lawns On behalf of the Radley Parish Council, we would like to welcome you to The Lawns; we hope you will be very happy in your new home. While The Lawns sits in the Parish of Radley, it is closely connected with both Radley and Kennington. These villages are vibrant and busy communities and we hope you will want to join in as much as possible. This booklet has been produced to give you some idea of the activities and opportunities in the villages as well as a short directory of those services that can be difficult to locate when first moving into a new community. More detail of the activities listed in this booklet can be found on the individual Parish Council websites (www.radleyvillage.org.uk and www.kennington- pc.gov.uk). To keep informed about events and news, also look at the Kennington Chronicle (available in the Kennington Library and online www.kenningtonchronicle.org.uk), the monthly Radley News (available in Radley Village Shop), and the Kennington Connected and Radley Village Facebook groups. The Parish Council is here to represent their village as well as help where we can; so please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or need any advice. CONTENTS Getting involved Going out and about - joining in - library - keeping active - shops and services - supporting your community - eating out - travel and transport Schools Keeping healthy and safe Churches and faith groups Map 1 Getting involved – joining in The villages are vibrant, busy communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Lipscomb Seckham
    Samuel Lipscomb Seckham By PETER HOWELL l TIL recently the name of Samuel Lipscomb Seckham was fairly widely U known in Oxford as that of the architect of Park Town. A few other facts, such as that he was City Surveyor, were known to the cognoscenti. No-one, however, had been able to discover anything significant about his background, let alone what happened to him after he built the Oxford Corn Exchange in 1861-2. In '970 a fortunate chance led to the establishment of contact with Dr. Ann Silver, a great-granddaughter of Seckham, and as a result it has been po ible to piece together the outline ofhis varied career.' He was born on 25 October ,827,' He took his names from his grandparents, Samuel Seckham (1761-1820) and Susan Lipscomb (d. 18'5 aged 48).3 His father, William ('797-,859), kept livery stables at 20 Magdalen Street, Oxford,. and prospered sufficiently to retire and farm at Kidlington.5 The family came from Devon, where it is aid that Seccombes have occupied Seccombe Farm at Germans­ week, near Okehampton, since Saxon limes. Seccombes are still living there, farming. It is thought that Seckllam is the earlier spelling, but tombstones at Germansweek show several different versions. 6 It is not known how the family reached Oxford, but Samuel Lipscomb Seckham's great-grandmother Elizabeth was buried at St. Mary Magdalen in 1805.7 His mother was Harriett Wickens (1800-1859). Her grandfather and father were both called James, which makes it difficult to sort out which is which among the various James W;ckens' recorded in I The fortunate chance occurred when Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening Statement on the Determination of the Need for a Strategic Environmental Assessment
    Screening Statement on the determination of the need for a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in accordance with the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 and European Directive 2001/42/EC for the North Hinksey Neighbourhood Development Plan 07/06/2018 SUMMARY In this screening opinion, Vale of White Horse District Council (the ‘Council’) determines that North Hinksey Neighbourhood Development Plan (North Hinksey NDP) does not require a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) or Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) appropriate assessment. INTRODUCTION 1. North Hinksey Parish Council has requested that Vale of White Horse (VoWH) District Council ‘screen’ the North Hinksey Neighbourhood Plan, to determine whether there is a requirement for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and HRA appropriate assessment. This report presents the Council’s Screening Opinion. BACKGROUND 2. One of the basic conditions that a Neighbourhood Plan (NP) must be tested against is whether the making of the NP is compatible with European Union obligations, including requirements under the SEA Directive. The aim of the SEA Directive is: “to contribute to the integration of environmental considerations into the preparation and adoption of plans and programmes with a view to promoting sustainable development, by ensuring that an environmental assessment is carried out of certain plans and programmes which are likely to have significant effects on the environment.” 3. In order to decide whether a proposed NP is likely to have significant environmental effects, and hence requires SEA, it should be ‘screened’ at an early stage, i.e. once the plan remit and objectives have been formulated. 4. Screening is ‘Stage A’ in Government’s six stage approach to SEA for NPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Know Your River
    Would you like to find out more about us, or about your environment? Then call us on 08708 506 506 (Mon-Fri 8-6) A user’s guide to the email River Thames enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk or visit our website www.environment-agency.gov.uk incident hotline getting to know 0800 80 70 60 (24hrs) floodline 0845 988 1188 your river Environment first: This publication is printed on paper made from 100 per cent previously used waste. By-products from making the pulp and paper are used for composting and fertiliser, for making cement and for generating energy. GETH0309BPGK-E-P Welcome to the River Thames safe for the millions of people who use it, from anglers and naturalists to boaters, We are the Environment Agency, navigation authority for the River Thames walkers and cyclists. This leaflet is an essential guide to helping the wide variety from Lechlade to Teddington. We care for the river, keeping it clean, healthy and of users enjoy their activities in harmony. To help us maintain this harmony, please To encourage better understanding amongst river users, there are nine River User Groups (RUGs) read about activities other than your own covering the length of the river from Cricklade to to help you appreciate the needs of others. Tower Bridge. Members represent various river users, from clubs and sporting associations to commercial businesses. If you belong to a club that uses the river, encourage it to join the appropriate group. Contact your local waterway office for details. Find out more about the River Thames at www.visitthames.co.uk Before you go..
    [Show full text]
  • Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way for Oxfordshire Relevant Date: 21St February 2006 Colour SHEET SP 50 NW
    Definitive Map of Public Rights of Way for Oxfordshire Relevant Date: 21st February 2006 Colour SHEET SP 50 NW 50 51 52 53 54 201/10 55 Bayswater Brook Pond 10 Church 10 Farm Parish Church of St Thomas of Canterbury Drain 201/9 201/9 Church Farm Cherwell River 201/12 Vicarage 7092 320/52 201/10 201/13 Cherwell Farm 201/11 0085 Pond Hill Farm 201/3 8784 Cottages Summertown House Woodstock Close Flats Hill Farm 2679 The Bungalow River Cherw Hill Farm Drew House Eaton Collects Court ell Hill Farm 6275 2276 Harris Court Drain Cherwell 294/9 Lodge Drain The Paddox Mulberry Court Drain MILL LANE Catholic Church Of St Gregory And West Grove St Augustine Manor View Avery Court Thamesdown Wood View 201/13 Bayswater Brook HawkswellHouse 201/11 Drain River Cherwell North Oxford Prep School for Boys Telephone Exchange Cavendish Court Pilgrims Oxford and Cranescourt Girls School Ma rtin Court NORTHERN BY-PASS ROAD Hobson Court Elsfield CP Church Hall Hawkswood PH Hill View Farm 1830 4331 6530 294/9 St Michaeland All Angels' Church 320/51 Field Barn Cottage 201/13 North Oxford 7124 Grove House Club Newcombe Court House Charles Ponsonby Dudley Court Woodstock Court Parkway House MILL LANE Summertown Prama River Cherwell House United Reformed Church Bradlands 2115 201/15 Garage MARSTON PARK WAY Manor House Northern House School and Clinic LODGE Robert Library Saunders CUMBERLEGE 294/1 House CLOSE Central Cumberlege Kitchen Oxfam House 294/14 CLOSE House Depot St Edward's School WomensService Royal Headquarters Voluntary Parmoor Court Summer Fields St
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 15 Cumulative Effects 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-150000 Revision A01
    OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 15 Cumulative Effects 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-150000 Revision A01 Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 15: Cumulative Effects Document Reference 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-150000 Author Jacobs Date June 2021 Revision Number A01 OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 15 Cumulative Effects 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-150000 Revision A01 Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 15: Cumulative Effects Document Version Control Version Date Author Reviewer Approver A01 Jun 2021 M. Skeete H. Kemm A. Naik Report for: Authored by: Network Rail Jacobs SN1 1180 Eskdale Rd Station Road Winnersh Swindon Reading SN11DG RG41 5TU © Copyright 2021 . The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Network Rail. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of Network Rail, and for the exclusive use of Network Rail, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Network Rail. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. OFFICIAL Network Rail Oxford Corridor Phase 2 Capacity Improvement Scheme Environmental Impact Assessment – Environmental Statement: Chapter 15 Cumulative Effects 163390-JAC-REP-EEN-150000 Revision A01 Contents 15.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RIVER THAMES a Complete Guide to Boating Holidays on the UK’S Most Famous River the River Thames a COMPLETE GUIDE
    THE RIVER THAMES A complete guide to boating holidays on the UK’s most famous river The River Thames A COMPLETE GUIDE And there’s even more! Over 70 pages of inspiration There’s so much to see and do on the Thames, we simply can’t fit everything in to one guide. 6 - 7 Benson or Chertsey? WINING AND DINING So, to discover even more and Which base to choose 56 - 59 Eating out to find further details about the 60 Gastropubs sights and attractions already SO MUCH TO SEE AND DISCOVER 61 - 63 Fine dining featured here, visit us at 8 - 11 Oxford leboat.co.uk/thames 12 - 15 Windsor & Eton THE PRACTICALITIES OF BOATING 16 - 19 Houses & gardens 64 - 65 Our boats 20 - 21 Cliveden 66 - 67 Mooring and marinas 22 - 23 Hampton Court 68 - 69 Locks 24 - 27 Small towns and villages 70 - 71 Our illustrated map – plan your trip 28 - 29 The Runnymede memorials 72 Fuel, water and waste 30 - 33 London 73 Rules and boating etiquette 74 River conditions SOMETHING FOR EVERY INTEREST 34 - 35 Did you know? 36 - 41 Family fun 42 - 43 Birdlife 44 - 45 Parks 46 - 47 Shopping Where memories are made… 48 - 49 Horse racing & horse riding With over 40 years of experience, Le Boat prides itself on the range and 50 - 51 Fishing quality of our boats and the service we provide – it’s what sets us apart The Thames at your fingertips 52 - 53 Golf from the rest and ensures you enjoy a comfortable and hassle free Download our app to explore the 54 - 55 Something for him break.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme Document
    Non-technical Summary of the Environmental Statement March 2018 Prepared by CH2M on behalf of the Environment Agency Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme Non-technical Summary of the Environmental Statement i Quality Assurance Project name Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme Project 1B1S reference Date March 2018 Version number 2 Author Corinna Morgan Approvals Name Signature Title [complete using Date Version 497-10 as guidance] Stuart Hedgecott SH Principal 1 Environmental Scientist Phil Marsh PM Project Manager 22.02.18 1 2 EIA Quality Mark This Environmental Statement, and the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) carried out to identify the significant environmental effects of the proposed development, was undertaken in line with the EIA Quality Mark Commitments. The EIA Quality Mark is a voluntary scheme, operated by the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA), through which EIA activity is independently reviewed, on an annual basis, to ensure it delivers excellence in the following areas: EIA Management EIA Team Capabilities EIA Regulatory Compliance EIA Context & Influence EIA Content EIA Presentation Improving EIA practice To find out more about the EIA Quality Mark please visit: www.iema.net/qmark Oxford Flood Alleviation Scheme Non-technical Summary of the Environmental Statement ii Non-Technical Summary 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Background We, the Environment Agency, together with our local partners, are proposing a flood alleviation scheme (‘the Scheme’) to manage the flood risk to Oxford over the next 100 years. The Scheme will involve lowering parts of the floodplain to create a new channel for holding water, modifying existing rivers and streams, and building new flood walls and embankments in some areas (see Figure 1a and 1b).
    [Show full text]