DOCSLIB.ORG

Tadcaster Magnesian Limestone3d Borehole and Cross-Sections Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tadcaster Magnesian Limestone3d Borehole and Cross-Sections Study Tadcaster Magnesian Limestone 3-D Borehole Interpretation and Cross-sections Study Geology and Landscape (South) Report CR/06/256 N BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY AND LANDSCAPE (SOUTH) PROGRAMME IN CONFIDENCE REPORT CR/06/256N Tadcaster Magnesian Limestone 3-D Borehole Interpretation and Cross-sections Study The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s A H Cooper and R S Lawley Stationery Office. Ordnance Survey licence number Licence No:100017897/2007. & Licence No:100026380/2007 Study undertaken for the Environment Agency Keywords Report;Permian, Quaternary, 3D cross-sections, Tadcaster, Yorkshire, hydrogeology. Front cover 3-D model of the Permian strata and Quaternary deposits of the Tadcaster area. Bibliographical reference A H COOPER, R S LAWLEY. 2007. Tadcaster Magnesian Limestone 3-D Borehole Interpretation and Cross-sections Study. British Geological Survey In Confidence Report, CR/06/256. 59pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected] You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. © NERC 2007. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2007 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey offices Sales Desks at Nottingham, Edinburgh and London; see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG The London Information Office also maintains a reference 0115-936 3241 Fax 0115-936 3488 collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation. e-mail: [email protected] The Survey publishes an annual catalogue of its maps and other www.bgs.ac.uk publications; this catalogue is available from any of the BGS Sales Shop online at: www.geologyshop.com Desks. The British Geological Survey carries out the geological survey of Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the latter as an agency 0131-667 1000 Fax 0131-668 2683 service for the government of Northern Ireland), and of the e-mail: [email protected] surrounding continental shelf, as well as its basic research projects. It also undertakes programmes of British technical aid in geology in developing countries as arranged by the Department London Information Office at the Natural History Museum for International Development and other agencies. (Earth Galleries), Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2DE The British Geological Survey is a component body of the Natural Environment Research Council. 020-7589 4090 Fax 020-7584 8270 020-7942 5344/45 email: [email protected] Forde House, Park Five Business Centre, Harrier Way, Sowton, Exeter, Devon EX2 7HU 01392-445271 Fax 01392-445371 Geological Survey of Northern Ireland, Colby House, Stranmillis Court, Belfast, BT9 5BF 028-9038 8462 Fax 028-9038 8461 Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB 01491-838800 Fax 01491-692345 Sophia House, 28 Cathedral Road, Cardiff, CF11 9LJ 029–2066 0147 Fax 029–2066 0159 Parent Body Natural Environment Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon, Wiltshire SN2 1EU 01793-411500 Fax 01793-411501 www.nerc.ac.uk Foreword This report is the published product of a study by the British Geological Survey (BGS) for the Environment Agency (EA). Acknowledgements Dr Andrea Lancaster of the Environment Agency is thanked for her help with establishing and reviewing the project. Many BGS staff were involved in the lithological coding of boreholes; their work is gratefully acknowledged. Steve Thorpe is thanked for help with extracting borehole data parameters and reviewing the document. Special acknowledgement goes to Simon Price, Holger Kessler and Jon Ford for help and support in the use of GSI3-D. Use of Ordnance Survey Copyright data Maps in this report use Ordnance Survey material with the permission of the Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Environment Agency 100026380/ 2007; British Geological Survey 100017897/2007. Exclusion of Warranty This report is compiled in good faith by BGS from information obtained from its own researches and/or received from a number of different sources. The BGS and the Natural Environment Research Council give no warranties expressed or implied in relation to, and disclaim all responsibility for, the quality and/or accuracy of the information contained in this report, howsoever that information may have been obtained or received, or as to its suitability for any use. BGS and the Natural Environment Research Council accepts no liability whatsoever in respect of loss, damage, injury or death arising out of or in any way related to information contained in this report. The cross-sections and thematic maps are compiled from borehole information that varies considerably in distribution, age, quality, depth and content. The geological information has been compiled from these boreholes and digital map data at a scale of 1: 50,000. Use of the cross- section interpretations at scales larger than 1:50,000 is not recommended. The varied distribution of the borehole data means that in some places the sections are well constrained and in others the geological lines are considerably extrapolated. The cross-sections are the best interpretation that the geologist has been able to make from the existing information and new boreholes may require this interpretation to be modified. 1 Contents Foreword........................................................................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ 1 Use of Ordnance Survey Copyright data .................................................................................... 1 Exclusion of Warranty.................................................................................................................. 1 Contents.......................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary........................................................................................................................................ 6 1 Introduction and Scope of Study .......................................................................................... 7 2 Borehole Coding..................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Coding methodology ...................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Borehole elevation.......................................................................................................... 9 3 Cross-Section Construction and Correlation ...................................................................... 9 3.1 Cross-section construction Methodology ..................................................................... 10 3.2 Correlation.................................................................................................................... 10 4 Aquifer and aquitard thickness modelling ........................................................................ 12 4.1 Overview ...................................................................................................................... 12 4.2 Gridding details ............................................................................................................ 12 5 Bedrock Geology .................................................................................................................. 14 5.1 Carboniferous strata...................................................................................................... 16 5.2 Permian strata ............................................................................................................... 16 5.3 Yellow Sands Formation .............................................................................................. 17 5.4 Marl Slate Formation.................................................................................................... 17 5.5 Zechstein Group ........................................................................................................... 17 5.6 Cadeby Formation ........................................................................................................ 17 5.7 Hayton Anhydrite (or gypsum) Formation................................................................... 18 5.8 Edlington Formation..................................................................................................... 18 5.9 Brotherton Formation ................................................................................................... 18 5.10 Billingham Anhydrite (or gypsum) Formation............................................................. 19 5.11 Roxby Formation.........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 492 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    492 bus time schedule & line map 492 Tadcaster - Sherburn View In Website Mode The 492 bus line (Tadcaster - Sherburn) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Sherburn In Elmet <-> Tadcaster: 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM (2) Tadcaster <-> Sherburn In Elmet: 10:25 AM - 5:35 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 492 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 492 bus arriving. Direction: Sherburn In Elmet <-> Tadcaster 492 bus Time Schedule 18 stops Sherburn In Elmet <-> Tadcaster Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Sherburn Crossroads, Sherburn In Elmet 9 Low Street, Sherburn in Elmet Tuesday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Petrol Station, Sherburn In Elmet Wednesday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Victoria Court, Sherburn in Elmet Thursday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Pasture Way, Sherburn In Elmet Friday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Moor Lane, Sherburn in Elmet Saturday 8:55 AM - 4:55 PM Oak Terrace, Sherburn In Elmet A162, Sherburn In Elmet Civil Parish Rainbow Nursery School, Barkston Ash 492 bus Info Oldgates Lane, Barkston Ash Direction: Sherburn In Elmet <-> Tadcaster Stops: 18 Headwell Lane, Saxton Trip Duration: 27 min Line Summary: Sherburn Crossroads, Sherburn In Scarthingwell Crescent, Saxton Elmet, Petrol Station, Sherburn In Elmet, Pasture Saxton Court, Saxton With Scarthingwell Civil Parish Way, Sherburn In Elmet, Oak Terrace, Sherburn In Elmet, Rainbow Nursery School, Barkston Ash, Rockingham Court, Towton Oldgates Lane, Barkston Ash, Headwell Lane, Rockingham Court, Towton Civil Parish Saxton, Scarthingwell
    [Show full text]
  • Land at the Old Quarry Monk Fryston Offers Invited
    Land at The Old Quarry Monk Fryston Offers Invited Land/Potential Development Site – Public Notice – We act on behalf of the Parish Council / vendors in the sale of this approximately 2/3 acre site within the development area of Monk Fryston. Any interested parties are invited to submit best and final offers (conditional or unconditional) in writing (in a sealed envelope marked ‘Quarry Land, Monk Fryston’ & your name) to the selling agents before the 1st June 2014. Stephensons Estate Agents, 43 Gowthorpe, Selby, YO8 4HE, telephone 01757 706707. • Potential Development Site • Subject to Planning Permission • Approximately 2/3 Acre • Sought After Village Selby 01757 706707 www.stephensons4property.co.uk Estate Agents Chartered Surveyors Auctioneers Land at The Old Quarry, Monk Fryston Potential development site (subject to planning permission). The site extends to approximately 2/3 acre and forms part of a former quarry, located in this much sought after village of Monk Fryston. With shared access off the Main Street/Leeds Road. The successful developer/purchaser may wish to consider the possibility of a further access off Lumby Lane/Abbeystone Way, which may be available via a third party (contact details can be provided by the selling agent). The site is conveniently located for easy vehicular access to the A1/M62 motorway network and commuting to many nearby regional centres such as York, Leeds, Doncaster and Hull etc. TO VIEW LOCAL AUTHORITY By appointment with the agents Selby office. Selby District Council Civic Centre LOCATION Portholme Road Located on the edge of this much sought after village of Monk Selby Fryston and being conveniently located for access to the A1/M62 YO8 4SB motorway network and commuting to many regional centres like Telephone 01757 705101 Leeds, Wakefield, Doncaster, Tadcaster, York and Selby etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire GREEN Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study
    Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Yorkshire GREEN Project Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study (YG-NSC-00001) National Grid National Grid House Warwick Technology Park Gallows Hill Warwick CV34 6DA Final - March 2021 Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Control Document Properties Organisation AECOM Ltd Author Alison Williams Approved by Michael Williams Title Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Document Reference YG-NSC-00001 Version History Date Version Status Description/Changes 02 March 2021 V8 Final version Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Page intentionally blank Yorkshire GREEN Project – Corridor and Preliminary Routeing and Siting Study Report Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview and Purpose 1 1.2 Background and Need 3 1.3 Description of the Project 3 1.4 Structure of this Report 7 1.5 The Project Team 7 2. APPROACH TO ROUTEING AND SITING 8 2.1 Overview of National Grid’s Approach 8 2.2 Route and Site Selection Process 11 2.3 Overview of Stages of Development 11 3. THE STUDY AREA 16 3.1 Introduction 16 3.2 York North Study Area 16 3.3 Tadcaster Study Area 17 3.4 Monk Fryston Study Area 17 4. YORK NORTH OPTIONS APPRAISAL 19 4.1 Approach to Appraisal 19 4.2 CSEC Siting Area Identification 19 4.3 Substation Siting Area Identification 19 4.4 Overhead Line Routeing Identification 20 4.5 Combination Options 20 4.6 Screening of York North Options 24 4.7 Options Appraisal Summary of Remaining York North Options 28 4.8 The Holford Rules and Horlock Rules 76 4.9 York North Preferred Option 76 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 1THE MEDIEVAL EFFIGY at ST HELEN's, ESCRICK Brian And
    1THE MEDIEVAL EFFIGY AT ST HELEN’S, ESCRICK Brian and Moira Gittos Introduction Very little is known about the history of the military effigy preserved in the church of St. Helen, Escrick in the East Riding of Yorkshire. It was presumably transferred from the medieval church, close to Escrick Hall, to each of its two successors on the present site. However, since the Lascelles family, who held Escrick through the thirteenth and most of the fourteenth-century were patrons of nearby Thicket Priory (amongst other establishments), the possibility that it was brought to Escrick following the Dissolution cannot be discounted.1 For many years the effigy rested on the floor at the west end of the north aisle in a sadly mutilated state, with the lower part of the figure missing. It does not appear to have attracted the attention of pre-twentieth century antiquaries and the first detailed description of which we are aware is that of W. M. I’Anson in 1927.2 The effigy was then ‘Placed in a modern arched and canopied recess, specially made for its accommodation, in the exterior wall of the modern church....’. This recess can still be seen on the south side of the chancel. His accompanying drawing shows the effigy much as it is today and he dated it to c.1325. However, research by the present authors has indicated that the effigy is earlier in date. The revised dating has not met with universal approval and the significance of some of the armour details, particularly the method of attaching the scabbard to the sword belt has been the subject of vigorous debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Selby District Council Is Currently Preparing Its Core Strategy of the Local Development Framework (LDF)
    Meeting: PLANNING COMMITTEE Date: WEDNESDAY 2 MAY 2012 Time: 4.00PM Venue: COUNCIL CHAMBER To: Councillors J Cattanach, I Chilvers, J Crawford, J Deans (Chair), Mrs D Davies, D Mackay, J McCartney, Mrs E Metcalfe, C Pearson (Vice Chair), D Peart, Mrs S Ryder and S Shaw-Wright. Agenda 1. Apologies for absence 2. Disclosures of Interest Members of the Planning Committee should disclose personal or prejudicial interest(s) in any item on this agenda. 3. Chair’s Address to the Planning Committee 4. Minutes To confirm as a correct record the minutes of the proceedings of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 11 April 2012 (pages 3 to 7 attached). 5. Planning Applications Received Reports of Business Manager – Dylan Jones 5.1 2011-1226-HPA – Kyme Lodge, Newton Kyme, Tadcaster (pages 9 to 25 attached). 5.2 2011-0563-FUL – Land Adj Southlands House, Southlands Close, South Milford (pages 26 to 70). 6. Proposed Revocation of Planning Application Granted 6.1 2011-1006-FUL – Hill Top Farm, Back Lane, Acaster Selby, York (pages 71 to 90) Planning Committee 2 May 2012 1 Martin Connor Chief Executive Dates of next meetings 30 May 2012 11 July 2012 12 September 2012 10 October 2012 7 November 2012 12 December 2012 Enquiries relating to this agenda, please contact Democratic Services on: Tel: 01757 292037 Fax: 01757 292020 Email: [email protected] Planning Committee 2 May 2012 2 Minutes Planning Committee Venue: Council Chamber Date: 11 April 2012 Present: Councillors J Cattanach, I Chilvers, J Crawford, J Deans (Chair), Mrs D Davies, D Mackay, Mrs E Metcalfe, J McCartney, C Pearson, D Peart, Mrs S Ryder, and S Shaw-Wright Apologies for Absence: None Officers Present: Business Manager, Lead Officer - Planning, Planning Officer, Senior Solicitor and Democratic Services Officer Public: 6 members of the public Press: None 41.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-D Bedrock Geology Model of the Permo-Triassic of Yorkshire and East Midlands
    3-D Bedrock geology model of the Permo-Triassic of Yorkshire and East Midlands Geology and Landscape Southern Britain Programme Internal Report CR/06/091 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY AND LANDSCAPE SOUTHERN BRITAIN PROGRAMME INTERNAL REPORT CR/06/091 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the 3-D Bedrock geology model of Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/2006. the Permo-Triassic of Yorkshire Keywords and East Midlands Report; 3-D Model; Sherwood Sandstone Group; Mercia Mudstone Group; Sneinton Formation; Permian; Roxby Formation; Brotherton Ford, J., Napier, B., Cooper, A., Pharaoh, T., Vincent, C., Carney, Formation; Edlington Formation; J., Thorpe, S., Brayson, J. Cadeby Formation; Yellow Sands Formation; Basal Permian Breccia; Aquifer;. Front cover Model output showing faulted elevation grid for the base Sherwood Sandstone Group and the thickness of the Sherwood Sandstone Group Bibliographical reference FORD, J., NAPIER, B., COOPER, A., PHARAOH, T., VINCENT, C., CARNEY, J., THORPE, S., BRAYSON, J.. 2005. 3-D Bedrock geology model of the Permo-Triassic of Yorkshire and East Midlands. British Geological Survey Internal Report, CR/06/091. 39pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Geological Framework
    21/2/12 GeolFrameworkPaper_postreview_v2acceptchanges_editorcomments New insights from 3D geological models at analogue CO2 storage sites in Lincolnshire and eastern Scotland, UK. Alison Monaghan1*, Jonathan Ford2, Antoni Milodowski2, David McInroy1, Timothy Pharaoh2, Jeremy Rushton2, Mike Browne1, Anthony Cooper2, Andrew Hulbert2 and Bruce Napier2 1 British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3LA, UK. 2 British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK. * Corresponding author (email [email protected] (Approx.15,600 words in total, 25 figures) SUMMARY: Subsurface 3D geological models of aquifer and seal rock systems from two contrasting analogue sites have been created as the first step in an investigation into methodologies for geological storage of carbon dioxide in saline aquifers. Development of the models illustrates the utility of an integrated approach using digital techniques and expert geological knowledge to further geological understanding. The models visualize a faulted, gently dipping Permo-Triassic succession in Lincolnshire and a complex faulted and folded Devono-Carboniferous succession in eastern Scotland. The Permo-Triassic is present in the Lincolnshire model to depths of -2 km OD, and includes the aquifers of the Sherwood Sandstone and Rotliegendes groups. Model-derived thickness maps test and refine Permian palaeogeography, such as the location of a carbonate reef and its associated seaward slope, and the identification of aeolian dunes. Analysis of borehole core samples established average 2D porosity values for the Rotliegendes (16%) and Sherwood Sandstone (20%) groups, and the Zechstein (5%) and Mercia Mudstone (<10%) groups, which are favourable for aquifer and seal units respectively. Core sample analysis has revealed a complex but well understood diagenetic history.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleet List - January 2018
    FOI 1117.2017-18 Fleet List - January 2018 Reg Make Model Operator Based YJ65DFD BMW 330 PP, RPG RICHMOND YJ15HCA BMW 330 PP, RPG RICHMOND YJ65DFC BMW 330 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXW BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG HARROGATE BHR YJ64AYG BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG HARROGATE BHR YJ65DFP BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG MALTON YJ15HDD BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG MALTON YJ64AYF BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG MALTON NX14AWU BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG MALTON YJ16HGG BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG SKIPTON YJ15HCG BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG SKIPTON NX14AYB BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG TADCASTER YJ64AXN BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ15HCY BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ64AYM BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ15HDC BMW 330 X-Drive PP, RPG, RCT TADCASTER YJ12BFM BMW 530 PP, RPG MALTON YJ59OHW BMW 530 Training Department THIRSK VALE HOUSE NX14AXK BMW R1200 PP, RPG RICHMOND YJ16HFZ BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXM BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXF BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXG BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXH BMW R1200 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AXJ BMW R1200 PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ66BSO BMW RT1200 Training Department THIRSK VALE HOUSE YJ15HDE BMW X5 PP, RPG HARROGATE BHR YJ65DDL BMW X5 PP, RPG HARROGATE BHR YJ64AYU BMW X5 PP, RPG MALTON NX14AXV BMW X5 PP, RPG RICHMOND YJ15HCP BMW X5 PP, RPG TADCASTER NX14AYA BMW X5 PP, RPG TADCASTER YJ64AYB BMW X5 PP, RPG THIRSK VALE HOUSE NX14AYC BMW X5 Training Department THIRSK VALE HOUSE KW66YEY DUCATI Multisrada 1200 M/Cy PP, RPG, Bikesafe TADCASTER YK10AUM FORD CONNECT York MILL HOUSE (NTH STR) LV59YTN FORD
    [Show full text]
  • Ref Parish GU-02 BOOSBECK PCC GU-04 BROTTON PCC GU-06
    DIOCESE OF YORK - ARCHDEACONRY OF CLEVELAND GUISBOROUGH DEANERY PARISH and reference number Ref Parish GU-02 BOOSBECK PCC GU-04 BROTTON PCC GU-06 CARLIN HOW ST HELEN'S PCC GU-08 COATHAM & DORMANSTOWN PCC GU-12 EASINGTON PCC GU-14 GUISBOROUGH PCC GU-18 KIRKLEATHAM PCC GU-22 LIVERTON PCC GU-24 LOFTUS PCC GU-26 MARSKE IN CLEVELAND PCC GU-30 NEW MARSKE PCC GU-34 REDCAR PCC GU-36 SALTBURN PCC GU-38 SKELTON IN CLEVELAND PCC GU-44 WILTON PCC ST CUTHBERTS DIOCESE OF YORK - ARCHDEACONRY OF CLEVELAND MIDDLESBROUGH DEANERY PARISH and reference number Ref Parish MD-02 ACKLAM WEST PCC MD-06 ESTON PCC MD-10 GRANGETOWN PCC MD-12 MARTON IN CLEVELAND PCC MD-14 MIDDLESBROUGH ALL SAINTS PCC MD-15 HEMLINGTON PCC MD-16 MIDDLESBROUGH ST AGNES PCC MD-18 ST BARNABAS LINTHORPE PCC MD-20 MIDDLESBROUGH ST OSWALD & ST CHAD PCC MD-22 MIDDLESBROUGH ST COLUMBA MD-28 MIDDLESBROUGH ST JOHN PCC MD-30 MIDDLESBROUGH ST MARTIN PCC MD-38 MIDDLESBROUGH ST THOMAS PCC MD-40 M'BROUGH THE ASCENSION PCC MD-42 ORMESBY PCC MD-46 NORTH ORMESBY PCC MD-48 SOUTH BANK PCC MD-50 THORNABY NORTH PCC MD-52 THORNABY SOUTH PCC DIOCESE OF YORK - ARCHDEACONRY OF CLEVELAND MOWBRAY DEANERY PARISH and reference number Ref Parish MW-02 BAGBY PCC MW-04 BALDERSBY PCC MW-06 BROMPTON [N'ALLERTON] PCC MW-08 CARLTON MINIOTT PCC MW-10 COWESBY PCC MW-12 DALTON PCC MW-16 EAST HARLSEY PCC MW-18 FELIXKIRK PCC MW-20 INGLEBY ARNCLIFFE PCC MW-22 KILBURN PCC MW-24 KIRBY KNOWLE PCC MW-26 KIRBY SIGSTON PCC MW-28 LEAKE PCC MW-30 NORTHALLERTON PCC MW-32 OSMOTHERLEY PCC MW-34 ROUNTON EAST & WEST PCC MW-36 SILTONS PCC
    [Show full text]
  • Prefix-18001 Email: [email protected]
    West Offices Station Rise York, Y01 6GA Y01 6GA Tel: 01904 555870 RNID typetalk: prefix-18001 Email: [email protected] Website: www.valeofyorkccg.nhs.uk 29th April 2016 Dear RE: Smoking Cessation Prescribing We appreciate practices have received various communications from the CCG, City of York Council and North Yorkshire County Council regarding the provision of smoking cessation services, in particular prescribing related to those products. This is an update on the latest position of the 3 Local Authorities. Public Health within the Local Authority are legally required and responsible for smoking cessation services within their localities. For Vale of York CCG we have the added complication of 3 Local Authorities: City of York Council, North Yorkshire County Council and East Riding of Yorkshire Council. NHS Vale of York CCG does not have the responsibility to commission smoking cessation services and hence has no authority on the service. The 3 Local Authorities have separate commissioning positions on smoking cessation services as follows: City of York Council Beech Grove Medical Practice Clifton Medical Practice Dalton Terrace Surgery East Parade Medical Practice Elvington Medical Practice Front Street Surgery Gillygate Surgery NHS Vale of York Clinical Commissioning Group Chair: Keith Ramsay Chief Clinical Officer: Dr Mark Hayes Haxby Group Practice Jorvik Medical Practice My Health Group Petergate Surgery Priory Medical Group The Old School Medical Practice The Surgery at 32 Clifton Unity Health York Medical Group Jorvik Gillygate Practice East Parade CYC have stopped commissioning the Specialist Stop Smoking Service. From 1st April 2016 only specific groups of patients can be referred into the new service: Pregnant women.
    [Show full text]
  • Garforth and Church Fenton
    High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | LA16 LA16: Garforth and Church Fenton High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H27 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report LA16: Garforth and Church Fenton H27 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • ABERFORD STAC 8/ 275/ 22: Thomson Vs. Shilleto 1620-1621
    ABERFORD STAC 8/ 275/ 22: Thomson vs. Shilleto 1620-1621 Aberford, a village and parish on the Great North Road (now the A1) about 12 miles east of Leeds, was described by John Leland in the early 1540s as “only a poor roadside place on Watling Street”.1 Located near the confluence of the Cock Beck and the smaller River Crow, the village had a fulling mill in the early 14th century and relied on pin making in the early modern period. According to Richard Braithwait’s Barnabees Journal (1638), Aberford’s “’beginning came from buying drink with pinning’” and the people appeared to be “’Poor … and very needy/ Yet of liquor too too greedy’”.2 The Court of Star Chamber extended is jurisdiction over cases of defamation on the grounds that it was dangerous to the peace and security of the state. Libels directed against the monarch, magistrates, or other public figures represented a clear threat to the state, it was argued, because “they incited to sedition”.3 As Sir Edward Coke noted in his Reports, “Let all men take heede how they complayne in wordes against any magistrate, for they are gods”.4 The alleged libel of which Thomas Shilleto complains falls into this category, for the complaint depends upon verses that denigrate him in his capacity as High Constable of Barkston Ash and, as a result, discredit him in the eyes of other officers of justice. The places where Shilleto claims that the libel was published--Sherburn in Elmet, South Milford, Ferrybridge, Knottingley, and Pontefract--are all within 13 miles of Aberford, Pontefract being the furthest from that village.
    [Show full text]