DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Shakespeare's Rome Political Science 141 Classics 91 Tufts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Shakespeare's Rome Political Science 141 Classics 91 Tufts Shakespeare’s Rome Political Science 141 Classics 91 Tufts University Fall Semester 2010 This course will utilize Shakespeare’s poetry to examine a central question of political philosophy: how does the character of the regime affect the character of the individuals who compose it? In addition to considering Shakespeare’s views on the reasons for Rome’s greatness and on the causes of its decline, the course will examine ancient Rome as a model of civic participation, the demands of Roman virtue, the role of women in a martial regime, and the place of philosophy in the city. The study of Shakespeare’s works on Rome, in conjunction with Shakespeare’s classical sources, Plutarch and Livy, will lead to consideration of whether Shakespeare diverges from his classical sources to come to an independent judgment of Rome, and if so, why? Office Hours Vickie Sullivan Packard Hall 111 x72328 [email protected] Tuesday 11-12 Wednesday 1:30-2:30 Thursday, 11-12 Other times by appointment Required Books Livy, Early History of Rome Plutarch, Plutarch’s Lives, vols. 1 & 2 Shakespeare, Rape of Lucrece Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra Shakespeare, Coriolanus Shakespeare, Julius Caesar Books on Overnight Reserve at Tisch Blits, The End of the Ancient Republic Bloom, Shakespeare’s Politics Brower, Hero and Saint: Shakespeare and the Graeco-Roman Heroic Tradition Cantor, Shakespeare’s Rome: Republic and Empire Charney, Shakespeare’s Roman Plays Donaldson, The Rapes of Lucretia: A Myth and its Transformations Fustel de Coulanges, The Ancient City: A Study of the Religion, Laws, and Institutions of Greece and Rome Gelzer, Caesar: Politician and Statesman Huffman, Coriolanus in Context Kahn, Roman Shakespeare: Warriors, Wounds, and Women 1 Books on Overnight Reserve at Tisch (continued) Knight, The Imperial Theme: Further Interpretations of Shakespeare’s Tragedies Including the Roman Plays MacCallum, Shakespeare’s Roman Plays and Their Background Miles, Shakespeare and the Constant Romans Miola, Shakespeare’s Rome Phillips, The State in Shakespeare’s Greek and Roman Plays Platt, Rome and Romans According to Shakespeare Simmons, Shakespeare’s Pagan World: The Roman Tragedies Spencer, William Shakespeare: The Roman Plays Traversi, Shakespeare: The Roman Plays Requirements When we begin studying each of the four selected works by Shakespeare, I will distribute paper topics for a five-page paper on that particular work. Students are required to write two such papers, but are free to choose which two. Papers submitted after their due date will be penalized for each day they are over due. I will also distribute topics for the final paper. Proposals for the final paper are due on Thursday, November 18 and the final paper itself on Thursday, December 16. Again, late papers will be penalized, and no work will be accepted after the end of the semester. For any paper, students may elect to write on a topic different from the ones I have specified, provided that they consult with me prior to the time they begin writing in the case of a five-page paper, or prior to the due date for the proposal in the case of the final paper. An in-class writing assignment on Plutarch will be given on Thursday¸ October 28. Participation will be an integral part of the course. Final grades will be determined in the following manner: Attendance and participation 20% Two five-page papers 20% (each) In-class writing assignment 10% Final paper (10-15 pages) 30% Learning Objectives This is a course in the subfield of Political Theory and Philosophy within the discipline of Political Science. Courses in this subfield deal with the study of the history of ancient and modern political philosophy and its influence in shaping and understanding the Western political tradition; they also debate and discuss concepts such as justice, liberty, sovereignty, citizenship, oppression, tyranny, revolution, war and empire, and the relationship between religion and politics. You will encounter many of these themes in this course. 2 DATE AND TOPIC ASSIGNMENT Introduction to the Course Tuesday, September 7 Rome’s Beginnings Thursday, September 9 Livy, Book I, pp. 33-57. The Ouster of the Kings and the Beginning of the Republic Tuesday, September 14 Livy, Book I, pp. 57-101. (Livy unavailable in English until 1600. Livy’s story of Lucretia available to Shakespeare in The Pallance of Pleasure by William Painter [1566].) Augustine’s commentary. Thursday, September 16 Shakespeare’s Rape of Lucrece (1594). Tuesday, September 21 Shakespeare’s Rape of Lucrece, continued. Paper Due. Thursday, September 23 Plutarch’s Life of Coriolanus. Livy, Book II, pp. 140-51. (Plutarch available in English in North’s Lives of the Noble Grecians and Romanes [1579].) Tuesday, September 28 Shakespeare’s Coriolanus (ca. 1608). Thursday, September 30 Coriolanus, continued. Tuesday, October 5 Coriolanus, continued. Paper Due. The Decline of the Republic Thursday, October 7 Matthias Gelzer, Caesar: Politician and Statesman, chapters 1 & 2. Tuesday, October 12 Plutarch’s Life of Julius Caesar. 3 Thursday, October 14 Plutarch’s Life of Cato, pp. 270-6, 283-91, 298-306, 312-17. Tuesday, October 19 Plutarch’s Life of Brutus. Thursday, October 21 Plutarch’s Life of Cicero. Tuesday¸ October 26 Plutarch’s Life of Pompey, pp. 104-39. Thursday, October 28 In-class writing assignment. Tuesday, November 2 Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar (1599). Thursday, November 4 Julius Caesar, continued. Tuesday, November 9 Julius Caesar, continued. Tuesday, November 16 Julius Caesar, continued. Paper due. The Beginning of Imperial Rule Thursday, November 18 Plutarch’s Life of Antony. Proposal for final paper due. Tuesday, November 23 Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra (ca. 1607). Tuesday, November 30 Antony and Cleopatra, continued. Thursday, December 2 Antony and Cleopatra, continued. Tuesday, December 7 Antony and Cleopatra, continued. Paper due. Thursday, December 9 Conclusions Thursday, December 16 Final Paper Due at noon Department of Political Science 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Livy's View of the Roman National Character
    James Luce, December 5th, 1993 Livy's View of the Roman National Character As early as 1663, Francis Pope named his plantation, in what would later become Washington, DC, "Rome" and renamed Goose Creek "Tiber", a local hill "Capitolium", an example of the way in which the colonists would draw upon ancient Rome for names, architecture and ideas. The founding fathers often called America "the New Rome", a place where, as Charles Lee said to Patrick Henry, Roman republican ideals were being realized. The Roman historian Livy (Titus Livius, 59 BC-AD 17) lived at the juncture of the breakdown of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. His 142 book History of Rome from 753 to 9 BC (35 books now extant, the rest epitomes) was one of the most read Latin authors by early American colonists, partly because he wrote about the Roman national character and his unique view of how that character was formed. "National character" is no longer considered a valid term, nations may not really have specific national characters, but many think they do. The ancients believed states or peoples had a national character and that it arose one of 3 ways: 1) innate/racial: Aristotle believed that all non-Greeks were barbarous and suited to be slaves; Romans believed that Carthaginians were perfidious. 2) influence of geography/climate: e.g., that Northern tribes were vigorous but dumb 3) influence of institutions and national norms based on political and family life. The Greek historian Polybios believed that Roman institutions (e.g., division of government into senate, assemblies and magistrates, each with its own powers) made the Romans great, and the architects of the American constitution read this with especial care and interest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supernatural in Tacitus When Compared with His Predecessor Livy, Tacitus Has Been Said to Be Less Interested in the “Super
    The Supernatural in Tacitus When compared with his predecessor Livy, Tacitus has been said to be less interested in the “supernatural,” a rubric under which we include the prodigies and omens of traditional Roman religion; characters’ participation in forms of religious expression, both traditional and non-normative; and nebulous superhuman forces such as fate and fortune. In this panel, we seek to modify this perception by investigating aspects of the superhuman, religious, and/or inexplicable in Tacitus’ works that contribute in important ways to his historiographical project and to our view of Tacitus as an historian. As the most recent contribution on this topic shows (K. Shannon-Henderson, Religion and Memory in Tacitus’ Annals. Oxford, 2019), religion and its related fields are extremely important to Tacitus’ narrative technique, and ‘irrational’ elements such as fatum and fortuna are constantly at play in Tacitus’ works, particularly, but not exclusively, in his historical narratives. Each of the five papers that we have gathered for this panel addresses these topics from different angles, whether focusing more on the literary, historical, or linguistic elements of the Tacitean narrative under examination. Two papers focus on omens and other ways of predicting the future; two examine religious experiences of Tacitus’ characters; and one considers the role of fortuna in the world of the Dialogus. In the first paper, Contributor #1 examines the value of observing supernatural signs for decision-making in the Histories. In particular, s/he looks at the practical value of observing and interpreting supernatural signs as predictors of the future success or failure of military leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliny's "Vesuvius" Narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20)
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20) Citation for published version: Berry, D 2008, Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20). in F Cairns (ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar . vol. 13, Francis Cairns Publications Ltd, pp. 297-313. Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Early version, also known as pre-print Published In: Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar Publisher Rights Statement: ©Berry, D. (2008). Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20). In F. Cairns (Ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar . (pp. 297-313). Francis Cairns Publications Ltd. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 LETTERS FROM AN ADVOCATE: Pliny’s ‘Vesuvius’ Narratives (Epp. 6.16, 6.20)* D.H. BERRY University of Edinburgh To us in the modern era, the most memorable letters of Pliny the Younger are Epp. 6.16 and 6.20, addressed to Cornelius Tacitus.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Livy and Tacitus
    Xavier University Exhibit Honors Bachelor of Arts Undergraduate 2021-5 Women in Livy and Tacitus STEPHEN ALEXANDER PREVOZNIK Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Recommended Citation PREVOZNIK, STEPHEN ALEXANDER, "Women in Livy and Tacitus" (2021). Honors Bachelor of Arts. 46. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab/46 This Capstone/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Bachelor of Arts by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Women in Livy and Tacitus By Stephen Prevoznik Prevoznik 1 Introduction Livy and Tacitus are both influential and important Roman authors. They have written two of the most influential histories of Rome. Livy covers from the founding of Rome until the Reign of Augustus. Tacitus focuses on the early empire, writing from the end of Augustus’ reign through Nero. This sets up a nice symmetry, as Tacitus picks up where Livy stops. Much has been written about the men they include, but the women also play an important role. This essay plans to outline how the women in each work are used by the authors to attain their goals. In doing so, each author’s aim is exposed. Livy: Women as Exempla Livy’s most famous work, Ab Urbe Condita, is meant to be read as a guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Influence of Art: the Effect of the Statues of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia on Valerius
    Under the Influence of Art: The Effect of the Statues of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia on Valerius Maximus’ Facta et Dicta Memorabilia In his work, Facta et Dicta Memorabilia, Valerius Maximus stated in the praefatio of his chapter “De Fortitudine” that he will discuss the great deeds of Romulus, but cannot do so without bringing up one example first; someone whose similarly great deeds helped save Rome (3.2.1-2). This great man is Horatius Cocles. Valerius Maximus noted that he must next talk about another hero, Cloelia, after Horatius Cocles because they fight the same enemy, at the same time, at the same place, and both perform facta memorabilia to save Rome (3.2.2-3). Valerius Maximus mentioned Horatius Cocles and Cloelia together, as if they are a joined pair that cannot be separated. Yet there is another legendary figure, Mucius Scaevola, who also fights the same enemy, at the same time, and also performs facta memorabilia to save Rome. It is strange both that Valerius Maximus seemed compelled to unite Cloelia with the mention of Horatius Cocles, and also that he did not include Mucius Scaevola. Instead, Scaevola’s story is at the beginning of the next chapter (3.3.1). Traditionally these three heroes, Horatius Cocles, Cloelia, and Mucius Scaevola, were mentioned together by historians such as Livy and Dionysius of Halicarnassus, whose works predate Valerius Maximus’ (Ab Urbe Condita 2.10-13, Roman Antiquities 5.23-35). Valerius Maximus was able to split up the triad, despite the tradition, without receiving flack because it had already been done by Virgil in the Aeneid, where he described the dual images of Cocles and Cloelia on Aeneas’ shield, but Scaevola is absent (8.646-651).
    [Show full text]
  • Pliny, the Eruption of Vesuvius
    CSCP Support Materials: Notes and Commentary Eduqas GCSE Latin Component 3A Latin Literature (Narratives) Pliny, The Eruption of Vesuvius For examination in 2020 and 2021 PUBLISHED BY THE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL CLASSICS PROJECT Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PQ, UK http://www.CambridgeSCP.com © University of Cambridge School Classics Project, 2019 Copyright In the case of this publication, the CSCP is waiving normal copyright provisions in that copies of this material may be made free of charge and without specific permission so long as they are for educational or personal use within the school or institution which downloads the publication. All other forms of copying (for example, for inclusion in another publication) are subject to specific permission from the Project. Image Acknowledgments Image on pg. 9 ‘Vesuvius Looms’ courtesy of Paull Young [http://www.flickr.com/photos/paullyoung/429923584/in/photostream/] Images on pg. 15 courtesy of Big Albert [https://www.flickr.com/photos/52948047@N05/24356049443] and Andrea Schaffer from Sydney, Australia [CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)] Image on pg. 26 courtesy of Wellcome Images [CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)] All other images taken from Cambridge Latin Course resources. First published 2019 version date: 14/08/2019 Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Pliny the Younger ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Hogg, Emotion and Greekness
    Histos Supplement ( ) – EMOTION AND GREEKNESS IN DIONYSIUS OF HALICARNASSUS’ ACCOUNT OF THE EXILE OF CORIOLANUS * Dan Hogg Abstract : Dionysius’ account of Coriolanus’ exile is rarely treated on its own terms, normally being deprecated as inferior to Livy or Plutarch’s version of the same. On the contrary, Dionysius’ account is a powerful illustration of his method in combining Roman source-material with Greek literary heritage. In particular, Dionysius uses epic and technical elements of stage language to draw out the psychological tensions at play in the story. This account, therefore, not only helps us get closer to Dionysius’ vision of Romanness, as Greek-inflected and distinct from Livy’s; it also problematises tough, Roman masculinity, suggesting that Dionysius is a more subtle observer of Rome than is usually imagined. Keywords: Coriolanus, family, mother, Livy, tragic history, Dionysius of Halicarnassus his paper considers Dionysius’ narration of Coriolanus’ encounter with his mother ( .@–), Twith especial regard to Dionysius’ presentation of their emotional relationship, and the ways in which this * I would like to thank all those who commented on versions at various stages, starting with Chris Pelling, who supervised the DPhil of which a version of this formed a part; Katherine Clarke and Stephen Oakley, who examined the DPhil; Julietta Steinhauer; the audience in Lampeter; the editors and anonymous reviewer of Histos ; and Alexander Meeus, for organising the conference where this was presented, and then performing his role as editor so generously. All references to Dionysius are to the Antiquitates Romanae , unless otherwise noted. Dan Hogg relationship drives the plot of Dionysius’ story.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Position and Symbolism of Ancient Rome's Vestal Virgin
    Western Oregon University Digital Commons@WOU Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) Department of History 2010 The oP wer of Virginity: The olitP ical Position and Symbolism of Ancient Rome’s Vestal Virgin Kathryn Ann Wagner Western Oregon University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Wagner, Kathryn Ann, "The oP wer of Virginity: The oP litical Position and Symbolism of Ancient Rome’s Vestal Virgin" (2010). Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History). 80. https://digitalcommons.wou.edu/his/80 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Digital Commons@WOU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Theses, Papers and Projects (History) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@WOU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I The Power of Virginity: The Political Position and Symbolism of Ancient Rome's Vestal Virgin By Kathryn Ann Wagner HST 499: Senior Seminar Spring 2010 Western Oregon University Primary Reader: Professor Benedict Lowe Secondary Reader: Professor Narasingha Sil Course Instructor: Professor John Rector II The Power of Virginity By: Kathryn Ann Wagner I The Vestal virgin has forever been an image of a woman draped in white priestly garments, carrying herself with an air of purity and near divinity. The Vestal's image is one that has captured the imagination of writers, painters, sculptures and scholars for centuries. However this near divine woman is more than what she appears.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliny Does Not Write History (Ep
    A Curious Case: Pliny Does Not Write History (Ep. 5.8) Jonathan J. Price Pliny the Younger admired historians and historical writing. In his letters he praises History‘s virtues, values a freedman who can read history well, and above all, feels unbounded esteem for his friend Tacitus, who had gained fame while still alive for his published historical researches.1 Pliny‘s most elaborate appreciation of historiography is contained in Ep. 5.8, a letter of 105-106 CE2 addressed to Titinius Capito, who had urged Pliny to write history himself. Pliny responds to Capito by lauding history-writing as the surest means to fame and affirming his desire to take up the task, but his convoluted and confusing explanation of the reasons for his delay amount to a decisive rejection of ever writing history. The letter has been variously understood as a serious contemplation on historiography, a document of angst about his status in Rome‘s literary world, a bid to make himself the subject of history, an urbane ‗polite refusal‘ to write history.3 This paper, offered in honor of my friend and colleague Hannah Cotton,4 will argue that the letter is a subtle but demonstrative rejection of history-writing which both reflects and comments on the state of Roman historiography in Pliny‘s generation. Pliny‘s correspondent, the equestrian Cn. Octavius Titinius Capito, was a generous literary patron and the host of a well-known salon, apparently an arbiter of taste in Rome in the early second century CE.5 After a military career, he served as procurator ab * I would like to thank Werner Eck for helpful criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Polybius and Livy on the Allies in the Roman Army
    POLYBIUS AND LIVY ON THE ALLIES IN THE ROMAN ARMY Paul Erdkamp* From the fourth or third century until the beginning of the rst century bc, Rome’s armies were also the armies of her allies. The socii and nomen Latinum raised at least half of the soldiers that fought wars for Rome. The Italic allies were clearly distinguished from the non-Italic troops, such as Cretan archers or Numidian horsemen, by the fact that they were governed by the formula togatorum. This can be concluded from their ‘de nition’ in the lex agraria from 111 bc: socii nominisve Latini quibus ex formula togatorum milites in terra Italia imperare solent. The formula togatorum is seen as a de ning element, distinguishing the Latin and Italic peoples from Rome’s overseas allies. Although in the second century bc a con- sciousness of Italy as a political and cultural unity gradually emerged, it was still referred to as a military alliance of Roman citizens and allies at the end of that century.1 The beginnings of this system remain in the dark, due to the inadequacies of our sources. The foedus Cassianum between Rome and the Latin League (traditionally dated to 493 bc) supposedly established a federal army under Roman command, but next to nothing is known about its functioning. The participation of the allied peoples was based on the treaties between their communities and Rome. The position of the Latin colonies was slightly different, because their obligations were probably based on the lex coloniae governing each Latin colony.2 We may assume that the role of the allies was re-de ned * I wish to thank John Rich, Luuk de Ligt and Simon Northwood for their many valuable comments.
    [Show full text]
  • OVID and LIVY the Relationship Between Ovid and Livy in the Fasti
    CHAPTER SIX OVID AND LIVY The relationship between Ovid and Livy in the Fasti is not as varied and complex as that between Ovid and Virgil, but it is still important and well worth studying. Such a study reveals more about Ovid’s engagement with preceding literature and about his narrative techniques in the poem, and the Livian perspective sharpens the focus and is vital for informed appreciation of all thirty-one narratives in the poem on Rome’s origins and early years,1 of four of them in particular. Research has already been done on the poet’s allusions to the historian, establishing numerous similarities and some minor differences in indi- vidual passages,2 but this will be the first analysis to address major issues and present a broad picture, discussing departures from Livy at length. Overall it seems that in the Fasti Ovid is reclaiming these myths and legends for verse and is responding to Livy the sober, moralistic historian (as a tempting target) and to Livy the accomplished story-teller (as a challenge). So Ovid puts the poetry and marvel back into these tales (with poetic language, figures and word order, with divine interventions and so on), eschews Livy’s manner (the solemnity, judicious caution, full and detailed treatment, ethical pur- pose, annalistic narrative and so forth) and also tries to improve on Livy’s stories as stories (making them livelier, snappier, darker etc., and sometimes mischievously out-Livying Livy). The resulting product has little historical value and is certainly open to censure as sheer entertainment, manifestly fanciful and fab- ricated, and lacking any real depth or breadth of vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography Jennifer Gerrish University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Gerrish, Jennifer, "Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 511. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/511 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sallust's Histories and Triumviral Historiography Abstract This dissertation explores echoes of the triumviral period in Sallust's Histories and demonstrates how, through analogical historiography, Sallust presents himself as a new type of historian whose "exempla" are flawed and morally ambiguous, and who rejects the notion of a triumphant, ascendant Rome perpetuated by the triumvirs. Just as Sallust's unusual prose style is calculated to shake his reader out of complacency and force critical engagement with the reading process, his analogical historiography requires the reader to work through multiple layers of interpretation to reach the core arguments. In the De Legibus, Cicero lamented the lack of great Roman historians, and frequently implied that he might take up the task himself. He had a clear sense of what history ought to be : encomiastic and exemplary, reflecting a conception of Roman history as a triumphant story populated by glorious protagonists. In Sallust's view, however, the novel political circumstances of the triumviral period called for a new type of historiography. To create a portrait of moral clarity is, Sallust suggests, ineffective, because Romans have been too corrupted by ambitio and avaritia to follow the good examples of the past.
    [Show full text]