Practical Approach to GI Tract Problems GP CME 2014 Sat 2 and 3Pm 55 Mins
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Child/Adolescent
Gastroenterology 2016;150:1456–1468 Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Child/ Adolescent Jeffrey S. Hyams,1,* Carlo Di Lorenzo,2,* Miguel Saps,2 Robert J. Shulman,3 Annamaria Staiano,4 and Miranda van Tilburg5 1Division of Digestive Diseases, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Connecticut Children’sMedicalCenter,Hartford, Connecticut; 2Division of Digestive Diseases, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; 3Baylor College of Medicine, Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Translational Science, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy; and 5Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina Characterization of childhood and adolescent functional Rome III criteria emphasized that there should be “no evi- gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) has evolved during the 2- dence” for organic disease, which may have prompted a decade long Rome process now culminating in Rome IV. The focus on testing.1 In Rome IV, the phrase “no evidence of an era of diagnosing an FGID only when organic disease has inflammatory, anatomic, metabolic, or neoplastic process been excluded is waning, as we now have evidence to sup- that explain the subject’s symptoms” has been removed port symptom-based diagnosis. In child/adolescent Rome from diagnostic criteria. Instead, we include “after appro- IV, we extend this concept by removing the dictum that priate medical evaluation, the symptoms cannot be attrib- “ ” fi there was no evidence for organic disease in all de ni- uted to another medical condition.” This change permits “ tions and replacing it with after appropriate medical selective or no testing to support a positive diagnosis of an evaluation the symptoms cannot be attributed to another FGID. -
Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment—A Systematic Review
J. Med. Toxicol. (2017) 13:71–87 DOI 10.1007/s13181-016-0595-z REVIEW Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment—a Systematic Review Cecilia J. Sorensen1 & Kristen DeSanto2 & Laura Borgelt3 & Kristina T. Phillips4 & Andrew A. Monte1,5,6 Received: 26 September 2016 /Revised: 25 November 2016 /Accepted: 1 December 2016 /Published online: 20 December 2016 # American College of Medical Toxicology 2016 Abstract Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a removed, 1253 abstracts were reviewed and 183 were in- syndrome of cyclic vomiting associated with cannabis cluded. Fourteen diagnostic characteristics were identi- use. Our objective is to summarize the available evidence fied, and the frequency of major characteristics was as on CHS diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment. We follows: history of regular cannabis for any duration of performed a systematic review using MEDLINE, Ovid time (100%), cyclic nausea and vomiting (100%), resolu- MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane tion of symptoms after stopping cannabis (96.8%), com- Library from January 2000 through September 24, 2015. pulsive hot baths with symptom relief (92.3%), male pre- Articles eligible for inclusion were evaluated using the dominance (72.9%), abdominal pain (85.1%), and at least Grading and Recommendations Assessment, weekly cannabis use (97.4%). The pathophysiology of Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Data CHS remains unclear with a dearth of research dedicated were abstracted from the articles and case reports and to investigating its underlying mechanism. Supportive were combined in a cumulative synthesis. The frequency care with intravenous fluids, dopamine antagonists, topi- of identified diagnostic characteristics was calculated cal capsaicin cream, and avoidance of narcotic medica- from the cumulative synthesis and evidence for patho- tions has shown some benefit in the acute setting. -
Gastro-Esophageal Reflux in Children
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Gastro-Esophageal Reflux in Children Anna Rybak 1 ID , Marcella Pesce 1,2, Nikhil Thapar 1,3 and Osvaldo Borrelli 1,* 1 Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London WC1N 3JH, UK; [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (N.T.) 2 Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Napoli, Italy 3 Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44(0)20-7405-9200 (ext. 5971); Fax: +44(0)20-7813-8382 Received: 5 June 2017; Accepted: 14 July 2017; Published: 1 August 2017 Abstract: Gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) is common in infants and children and has a varied clinical presentation: from infants with innocent regurgitation to infants and children with severe esophageal and extra-esophageal complications that define pathological gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although the pathophysiology is similar to that of adults, symptoms of GERD in infants and children are often distinct from classic ones such as heartburn. The passage of gastric contents into the esophagus is a normal phenomenon occurring many times a day both in adults and children, but, in infants, several factors contribute to exacerbate this phenomenon, including a liquid milk-based diet, recumbent position and both structural and functional immaturity of the gastro-esophageal junction. This article focuses on the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of GERD that occurs in infants and children, based on available and current guidelines. -
Nutritional Approaches to Chronic Nausea and Vomiting
NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #168 NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #168 Carol Rees Parrish, M.S., R.D., Series Editor Nutritional Approaches to Chronic Nausea and Vomiting Nitin K. Ahuja In addition to a relative lack of definitive diagnostics and effective therapies, maintenance of adequate nutritional intake can represent a significant challenge for patients with chronic nausea and vomiting. The strength and specificity of available dietary recommendations vary by underlying diagnosis, each of which has a tendency to overlap with others. The relevance of particular clinical distinctions (e.g. gastric emptying delay) is not yet certain, in light of which it may be the case that dietary recommendations for one patient category can be selectively applied to others with similar benefits. This brief review will consider the existing evidence basis for nutritional approaches to a variety of non-structural causes of chronic nausea and/or vomiting, including gastroparesis, chronic nausea and vomiting syndrome, functional dyspepsia, cyclic vomiting syndrome, and rumination syndrome. INTRODUCTION or a variety of reasons, chronic nausea and there is keen interest in potentially mitigating dietary vomiting can be difficult complaints to manage strategies. Chronic nausea and vomiting also may Fclinically. In cases of severe or refractory limit the adequacy of nutritional intake, which can symptoms, quality of life can be markedly diminished, necessitate consideration of enteral or parenteral which often corresponds with significant healthcare feeding alternatives. While several options exist for resource utilization.1 Objective testing modalities pharmacologic and mechanical intervention among beyond endoscopy and scintigraphy are also limited, patients with chronic nausea and vomiting, this review leading to a sometimes frustrating lack of etiologic will focus on nutrition-based approaches to their specificity and often empiric patterns of therapeutic longitudinal support. -
Pathophysiology, Differential Diagnosis and Management of Rumination Syndrome Kathleen Blondeau, Veerle Boecxstaens, Nathalie Rommel, Jan Tack
Review article: pathophysiology, differential diagnosis and management of rumination syndrome Kathleen Blondeau, Veerle Boecxstaens, Nathalie Rommel, Jan Tack To cite this version: Kathleen Blondeau, Veerle Boecxstaens, Nathalie Rommel, Jan Tack. Review article: pathophysiol- ogy, differential diagnosis and management of rumination syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Wiley, 2011, 33 (7), pp.782. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04584.x. hal-00613928 HAL Id: hal-00613928 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00613928 Submitted on 8 Aug 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic Review article: pathophysiology, differential diagnosis and management of rumination syndrome ForJournal: Alimentary Peer Pharmacology Review & Therapeutics Manuscript ID: APT-1105-2010.R2 Wiley - Manuscript type: Review Article Date Submitted by the 09-Jan-2011 Author: Complete List of Authors: Blondeau, Kathleen; KULeuven, Lab G-I Physiopathology Boecxstaens, Veerle; University of Leuven, Center for Gastroenterological Research Rommel, Nathalie; University of Leuven, Center for Gastroenterological Research Tack, Jan; University Hospital, Center for Gastroenterological Research Functional GI diseases < Disease-based, Oesophagus < Organ- Keywords: based, Diagnostic tests < Topics, Motility < Topics Page 1 of 24 Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutic 1 2 3 EDITOR'S COMMENTS TO AUTHOR: 4 Please consider the points raised by the reviewers. -
Traumatic Stress and the Autonomic Brain‐Gut Connection in Development: Polyvagal Theory As an Integrative Framework for Psychosocial and Gastrointestinal Pathology
Received: 9 July 2018 | Revised: 12 February 2019 | Accepted: 23 February 2019 DOI: 10.1002/dev.21852 SPECIAL ISSUE Traumatic stress and the autonomic brain‐gut connection in development: Polyvagal Theory as an integrative framework for psychosocial and gastrointestinal pathology Jacek Kolacz1 | Katja K. Kovacic2 | Stephen W. Porges1,3 1Traumatic Stress Research Consortium at the Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Abstract Bloomington, Indiana A range of psychiatric disorders such as anxiety, depression, and post‐traumatic 2 Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, stress disorder frequently co‐occur with functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Hepatology & Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Risk of these pathologies is particularly high in those with a history of trauma, abuse, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA and chronic stress. These scientific findings and rising awareness within the health‐ 3Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, care profession give rise to a need for an integrative framework to understand the North Carolina developmental mechanisms that give rise to these observations. In this paper, we in‐ Correspondence troduce a plausible explanatory framework, based on the Polyvagal Theory (Porges, Jacek Kolacz, the Traumatic Stress Research Psychophysiology, 32, 301–318, 1995; Porges, International Journal of Psychophysiology, Consortium at the Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN. 42, 123–146, 2001; Porges, Biological Psychology, 74, 116–143, 2007), which de‐ Email: [email protected] scribes how evolution impacted the structure and function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The Polyvagal Theory provides organizing principles for understand‐ ing the development of adaptive diversity in homeostatic, threat‐response, and psy‐ chosocial functions that contribute to pathology. -
Cyclical Vomiting Syndrome (CVS) Is a Rare Condition Affecting ~3 in 100,000 Children, with Caucasian but No Sex Predominance
orphananesthesia Anaesthesia recommendations for patients suffering from Cyclical (or cyclic) vomiting syndrome Disease name: Cyclical (or cyclic) vomiting syndrome ICD 10: G43.A0 Synonyms: Cyclical vomiting, not intractable; persistent vomiting, cyclical; cyclic vomiting, psychogenic Cyclical vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a rare condition affecting ~3 in 100,000 children, with Caucasian but no sex predominance. It is generally a disorder of childhood with symptom onset in pre or early school age. Adult cases (onset in 3rd to 4th decade) are also reported. As patients are well in between episodes, there is usually a delay in diagnosis (2-3 years in children, longer in adults), with frequent emergency department presentations. It is a diagnosis of exclusion. Diagnostic criteria have been published by various bodies including the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, the Rome Foundation (Rome IV 2016 under functional gastrointestinal disorders) and also the International Classification of Headache Disorders (3rd edition beta version). This reflects the uncertainty about the pathophysiology of the syndrome, described variously as functional, psychiatric, neurological either epileptogenic or autonomic dysfunction, association with or triggered by cannabis use versus a migraine variant or as episodic symptoms associated with migraine. Medicine in progress Perhaps new knowledge Every patient is unique Perhaps the diagnostic is wrong Find more information on the disease, its centres of reference and patient organisations on Orphanet: www.orpha.net 1 Disease summary The pattern experienced by an individual is stereotypical: a prodrome including nausea, a hyperemesis/vomiting phase (typically 6-8 episodes per hour for a few days; associated with continuing nausea, headache and abdominal pain), recovery phase and an asymptomatic phase of a few to several weeks. -
The Guide to Eating Disorder Recovery in Nashville
Eating disorders have the highest mortality rate of any mental illness. The Guide To Without treatment, Eating Disorder up to 20 percent of people diagnosed Recovery In with a serious ED die. With treatment, Nashville however, the mortality rate falls to 2 to 3 percent. Introduction Eating disorders, also known as ED, are serious, often fatal illnesses that involve severe disruption in a person’s relationship with food. Behaviors, thoughts, emotions—all become disturbed when an ED begins to develop. Common EDs include anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder (BED). Eating disorders have the highest mortality rate of any mental illness. Without treatment, up to 20 percent of people diagnosed with a serious ED die. With treatment, however, the mortality rate falls to 2 to 3 percent. The causes of ED are not clear, though both biological and environmental factors play a role, as does the culture’s idealization of thinness. People who have experienced sexual abuse or trauma are more likely to develop an ED, while intellectual disabilities can contribute to the development of lesser known disorders like pica (where people eat non-food items) and rumination syndrome (where people regurgitate food). Anxiety, depression, and substance abuse are common among people with ED. While ED can affect people of all ages, racial and ethnic backgrounds, body weights, and genders, they have been found to be more common in developed countries than less developed countries. Some general statistics of ED: • At least 30 million people, of all ages and genders, suffer from ED in the U.S. • At least one person dies as a direct result of an ED every 62 minutes. -
11A. GI Manifestations of Psychologic Disorders
11A. GI Manifestations of Psychologic Disorders Meredith Hitch, MD Robert Rothbaum, MD I. Psychogenic Associations Many psychological disorders have associated gastrointestinal manifestations. While evaluating a child for chronic abdominal pain, it is important to consider psychologic as well as organic etiologies for the symptoms II. Mood Disorder and Anxiety—Chronic Abdominal Pain A. There is a vicious cycle involving chronic pain, depression, and anxiety, each provoking the other B. Anxiety disorder is found in 80% of children with recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) in some studies C. Depressive symptoms found in 40% of children with RAP D. Possible explanations 1. Pain evokes mood and anxiety disorders 2. Affective disorders cause or exacerbate pain 3. A common biological predisposition underlies both problems 4. Common characteristics of both include somatization, social stress, and poor coping E. Life stressors provoke 1. Physiologic stress response with increased ccorticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) 2. CRF causes ↑ intestinal motility, hyperalgesia, psychoemotional inflammatory responses F. Typical life stresses 1. Maternal separation 2. Conflicting maternal relationships 3. Abusive environments – sexual or physical 4. Traumatic events – death, major illness, geographic dislocation 5. Marital discord 6. Peer pressure 7. Perfectionism III. Pathologic Aerophagia—Abdominal Distension A. Symptoms: eructation, abdominal cramping, flatulence, chronic diarrhea B. Tympanitic abdomen with very hyperactive bowel sounds C. Plain abdominal film showing uniform gassy distension from esophagus to rectum, without air fluid levels D. Hallmarks: 1. Increasing abdominal distension throughout the day 2. Increased flatus at night E. Visable air swallowing is often subtle and hard to detect F. Signs of abuse or stress IV. Mental Retardation/Anxiety/Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)— Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome A. -
Delirium Pdf, Epub, Ebook
DELIRIUM PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Lauren Oliver | 441 pages | 02 Jul 2012 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780061726835 | English | New York, NY, United States Delirium PDF Book We're gonna stop you right there Literally How to use a word that literally drives some pe Accessed May 1, The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. Share this Rating Title: Delirium 5. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. Get Word of the Day daily email! Delirium is common in the intensive care unit ICU , especially in older adults. Examples of organizations that may provide helpful information include the Caregiver Action Network and the National Institute on Aging. Delirium and acute confusional states: Prevention, treatment, and prognosis. The most important predisposing factors are: [17]. General Hospital Psychiatry. The American Delirium Society is a community of professionals dedicated to improving delirium care. Arousal Erectile dysfunction Female sexual arousal disorder. Rapid changes in emotion. In press. National Institute on Aging. Neurotic , stress -related and somatoform Adjustment Adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Mayo Clinic does not endorse companies or products. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. August Kids Definition of delirium. Delirium , also known as acute confusional state , is an organically caused decline from a previous baseline mental functioning that develops over a short period of time, typically hours to days. Healthcare Improvement Scotland. September Known causes of delirium include: Alcohol or illegal drug toxicity, overdose or withdrawal. Delirium Writer Don't let the two negative low ball reviews scare you away. Electroencephalography EEG allows for continuous capture of global brain function and brain connectivity, and is useful in understanding real-time physiologic changes during delirium. -
Recurrent Abdominal Pain and Vomiting
A SELF-TEST IM BOARD REVIEW ON A CME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVE: Readers will be aware of narcotic bowel syndrome as a consequence CLINICAL CREDIT of prolonged narcotic use. CASE MARKUS AGITO, MD MAGED RIZK, MD Department of Internal Medicine, Quality Improvement Officer, Digestive Akron General Medical Center, Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic; Assistant Akron, OH Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH Recurrent abdominal pain and vomiting 32-year-old man presents to the emer- Based on the information available, which A gency department with excruciating is the least likely cause of his symptoms? abdominal pain associated with multiple epi- 1 sodes of vomiting for the past 2 days. He re- □ Acute pancreatitis ports no fevers, headaches, diarrhea, constipa- □ Cyclic vomiting syndrome tion, hematochezia, melena, musculoskeletal □ Acute intermittent porphyria symptoms, or weight loss. His abdominal pain □ Gastroparesis is generalized and crampy. It does not radiate Acute pancreatitis and has no precipitating factors. The pain is Acute pancreatitis is the least likely cause of relieved only with intravenous narcotics. his symptoms. It is commonly caused by gall- stones, alcohol, hypertriglyceridemia, and cer- See related editorial, page 441 tain drugs.1 The associated abdominal pain is usually epigastric, radiates to the back, and is He does not smoke, drink alcohol, or use accompanied by nausea or vomiting, or both. illicit drugs. He has no known drug or food The onset of pain is sudden and rapidly increas- allergies. He says that his current condition es in severity within 30 minutes. CT shows en- causes him emotional stress that affects his largement of the pancreas with diffuse edema, A year ago, performance at work. -
Status of Brain Imaging in Gastroparesis
Review Status of Brain Imaging in Gastroparesis Zorisadday Gonzalez * and Richard W. McCallum Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Neurogastroenterology and GI Motility, Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 4800 Alberta Ave., El Paso, TX 79905, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 March 2020; Accepted: 7 April 2020; Published: 9 April 2020 Abstract: The pathophysiology of nausea and vomiting in gastroparesis is complicated and multifaceted involving the collaboration of both the peripheral and central nervous systems. Most treatment strategies and studies performed in gastroparesis have focused largely on the peripheral effects of this disease, while our understanding of the central nervous system mechanisms of nausea in this entity is still evolving. The ability to view the brain with different neuroimaging techniques has enabled significant advances in our understanding of the central emetic reflex response. However, not enough studies have been performed to further explore the brain–gut mechanisms involved in nausea and vomiting in patients with gastroparesis. The purpose of this review article is to assess the current status of brain imaging and summarize the theories about our present understanding on the central mechanisms involved in nausea and vomiting (N/V) in patients with gastroparesis. Gaining a better understanding of the complex brain circuits involved in the pathogenesis of gastroparesis will allow for the development of better antiemetic prophylactic and treatment strategies. Keywords: gastroparesis; brain imaging; functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI); positron emission tomography (PET) scan; central nervous system (CNS) 1. Introduction Gastroparesis is a chronic heterogeneous motor disorder with variable clinical manifestations including episodic nausea, vomiting, retching, post-prandial fullness, early satiety, and/or upper abdominal pain in the absence of mechanical obstruction [1].