Paideia 111: Enduring Questions Summer Community Read Study Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paideia 111: Enduring Questions Summer Community Read Study Guide Paideia 111: Enduring Questions Summer Community Read Study Guide This Study Guide is designed to help you prepare for your first class in Paideia 111. For the ancient Greeks, paideia meant education, and that meant more than “learning stuff.” A true education helped the learner grow into a fully developed human being. The term reflects the idea that education should both lead people to the knowledge needed for a flourishing human life and it should cultivate good character. Paideia is preparation for committed membership in a democracy. By coming to Luther College, you have already dedicated yourself to a kind of paideia, since the Luther curriculum is based on the ideals of a liberal education, which similarly stress cultivating the whole person. Liberal education is devoted to broad intellectual development rather than narrow career training. In the liberal arts, students use multiple approaches to a subject in order to reach a deeper understanding of themselves and the world. Our version of paideia begins with Paideia 111 and 112 that lay the groundwork for a liberal education by helping you develop skills of careful analysis and well- reasoned, articulate response. We hope this will help you develop the skills to read and understand challenging texts, and express your views in a way that others will respect. Further, Paideia 111 and 112 invite you to seek wisdom in community by joining with others to explore enduring questions and to share your ideas through discussion and writing. “Paideia 111: Enduring Questions” is the required Fall Semester foundational course for all incoming first-year students at Luther College. The faculty teaching the course have selected important works that offer potential answers to the kinds of big questions humans have confronted in many times and many places. The first questions we will explore this year are: “What makes us human? What does it mean to be human? ” This seems deceptively simple, but consider the questions a bit. Does being human mean belonging to a specific species with certain physical characteristics? Might we be biologically a member of that species and not be “human”? To what extent is being human the result of nature or nurture? Are we, unlike other beings, “made in the image and likeness of God?” What about those who follow different social and religious practices than we do? What would it take to undermine our humanity? You might note that this litany of sub- questions reveals that our query can be answered biologically, cosmologically, and sociologically/psychologically. Your examination of the enduring question begins before you come to campus as you read the Luther community summer reading text. This year we have selected a classic dystopian novel, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Social theorist Erich Fromm, in his 1961 afterword to the novel, claimed that it raised the central political question of the modern era, “[C]an human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget that he is human?” (Plume Centennial Edition, 329) This central theme in the novel fits well with the Paideia goal of exploring enduring questions and we anticipate great discussions of what Orwell has to say on the subject. In 1903 George Orwell was born Eric Arthur Blair into the family of a British Imperial bureaucrat who was serving in India. His father was responsible for ensuring the quality of the opium being produced as part of the British imperial trade with China. However, most of Orwell’s life was spent in England, where he attended a series of elite boarding schools on scholarship. As a result of pressure from his family, Orwell spent five years as a member of the Burmese Indian Imperial Police before deciding to chuck it all to become a writer. This decision led to a period of living in deprived circumstances where he became intimately acquainted with what it meant to be poor in modern industrial society. He also spent time in his youth fighting with the anti-fascist forces in the Spanish Civil War. These experiences and his work as a cultural writer for the BBC Eastern Service during WWII contributed to his political outlook. He was fundamentally concerned with opposing social class prejudice and preventing the rise of totalitarian government in both communist and capitalist nations. By the time Nineteen Eighty-Four was published George Orwell Orwell was already an established writer of considerable popularity and acclaim. This novel clinched that status. The novel is set in what for Orwell was the near future, when the world had been divided into three geopolitical zones that were in a perpetual state of war. It follows the trials of an ordinary citizen, Winston Smith, who is employed by the Ministry of Truth. In the course of the novel we discover that all mid-level citizens are under constant observation and the very history of the nation is rewritten on a daily basis to serve the needs of those in power. In the end even the resistant heroes of the novel—after repeated torture and brainwashing—submit to the ridiculous claims of the state and betray each other in the process. It seemed to the Paideia 111 and 112 planners that we, too, live in an era where our words can be monitored. We, too, live in a time of global conflicts and military solutions. For these reasons and others, the planners thought that a new look at Nineteen Eighty-Four might be enlightening. We hope that reading this novel will serve to begin the kind of questioning that is essential to a liberal arts education: What does it mean to be human? What rights do all human beings have? What is freedom? Can the powerless and oppressed really be free or realize their full humanity? How does power affect those who hold it? What kind of a society develops among people constantly preparing for or at war? You will meet with your Paideia section during orientation to discuss these and other questions raised by Nineteen Eighty-Four. Because orientation will be a very busy time, you need to complete your reading of Nineteen Eighty-Four before you arrive on campus Saturday, August 30. The book should provide a provocative summer reading experience and stimulate good conversations about our humanity. The Paideia faculty looks forward to talking to you about your response to Orwell’s story. About this Guide Below you will find questions that are based on the specific text of the novel. These questions are intended to help you focus on what might be discussed regarding the book. You are NOT expected to write out answers to all of these questions. They are intended to help you direct your reading and guide your thinking about the work. To use these questions most fruitfully • read them before you read the part of the book they cover and while you are reading keep the questions in the back of your mind; • underline key phrases or ideas in the narrative; • jot a brief note to yourself either at the end of a chapter or in the margin of the text when something strikes you as important; 2 Finally, these are NOT the only things you might notice or discuss about this novel. It is a very richly layered text. Keep track of whatever ideas come to you while you are reading by writing notes in a separate notebook or at the end of each section of the novel. Foreword by Thomas Pynchon and Afterword by Erich Fromm It is a good idea as you try to maximize your study in college to get into the habit of reading the supplementary materials in assigned books. In this case it will help you understand better what is going on in Nineteen Eight-four if you read the forward by Thomas Pynchon and the Afterword by Erich Fromm before you launch into the novel. Thomas Pynchon is a well-known author of post-modernist fiction. His Foreword, written for the 2003 edition of the novel, provides a great deal of detail about Orwell’s life and offers insights about the way in which the novel reveals Orwell’s commentary on his own society. 1. Create a list of the parallels Pynchon makes between Orwell’s life and the characters, plot and devices in the novel. Refer to this list as you read the novel to help you see the themes Orwell may be focusing our attention to. 2. Pynchon claims in his introduction that he is tired of a game that he calls “What didn’t Orwell get right?” Why does he find this a problem? What do you think might be useful in playing such a game? Erich Fromm was born in Germany a few years before Orwell. As a person of Jewish descent when the Nazi’s came to power, he fled first to Switzerland and then to New York City where he worked at Columbia University. Fromm is recognized as one of the leading humanists and social psychologists of the twentieth century. Fromm’s afterword was published in 1961, 12 years after the first publication of Nineteen Eighty-Four. This essay focuses on what Orwell might be trying to say in terms of the way human psychology can be altered by the social order in which people find themselves. 3. List the human emotional states that Fromm thinks are being created or destroyed by a post-World War II bureaucratic state. As you read think about the implication of this for the novel? For what it might mean to be human in such a social state? Are Orwell’s concerns (as Fromm describes them) about human nature justified? Book 1 Chapters I-III This section of the novel introduces us to the main characters and the repressive society in which they live.
Recommended publications
  • Enotes.Com Inc
    1984 by George Orwell Copyright Notice ©2011 eNotes.com Inc. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution or information storage retrieval systems without the written permission of the publisher. All or part of the content in these eNotes comes from MAXnotes® for 1984, and is copyrighted by Research and Education Association (REA). No part of this content may be reproduced in any form without the permission of REA. ©1998-2002; ©2002 by Gale Cengage. Gale is a division of Cengage Learning. Gale and Gale Cengage are trademarks used herein under license. For complete copyright information on these eNotes please visit: http://www.enotes.com/1984/copyright eNotes: Table of Contents 1. 1984: Introduction 2. 1984: The Principles of Newspeak 3. 1984: Overview 4. 1984: George Orwell Biography 5. 1984: Summary 6. 1984: Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 1, Chapter 1 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 1, Chapter 2 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 1, Chapter 3 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 1, Chapters 4 and 5 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 1, Chapters 6 and 7 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 1, Chapter 8 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 1 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 2 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 3 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 4 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 5 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 6 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 7 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 8 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 9 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 2, Chapter 10 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 3, Chapter 1 Summary and Analysis 1984 1 ♦ Part 3, Chapter 2 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 3, Chapter 3 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 3, Chapters 4 and 5 Summary and Analysis ♦ Part 3, Chapter 6 Summary and Analysis 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Art: NEWSPEAK
    Communication NEWSPEAK - is not all that new! A couple of years ago, I went along to see Headlong’s 1 stage adaptation of George Orwell’s masterpiece ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ (at the Melbourne Festival); which started me thinking………. The way words shape people’s thinking can be very powerful. This power can be used for both good and bad and is an important element in effective communication. Oratory and rhetoric are generally seen as positive motivational and persuasive skills; propaganda as the ‘flip side’ focused on misleading and creating ‘false truths’. The question is, can project professionals learn to use these skills to enhance their stakeholder engagement activities; and is this ethical? My feeling is that the ability to persuade stakeholders to help you be successful is a positive skill and is ethical provided the skill is used for the greater good. Therefore, we can learn from the black arts of propaganda showcased in 1984 and turn them into assets to enhance our communication and stakeholder engagement activities; but only as long as the ‘dark side’ of this powerful capability is understood and avoided as well. Orwell is famous for two novels, Animal Farm published in 1945 and Nineteen Eighty-Four published in 1949. Both were focused on the evil of totalitarian regimes, but 1984 goes beyond politics to look at the process of manipulating the way people think, or more precisely, how to use language to stop people thinking. Paradoxically, ‘The Principles of Newspeak’ are defined in an appendix to 1984 (and therefore few people read it), but reading the appendix reframes the whole book 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Newspeak’ in Polish Translations of British and American Press Articles Under Communist Rule
    Research in Language, 2017, vol. 15:1 DOI: 10.1515/rela-2017-0003 PRINCIPLES OF ‘NEWSPEAK’ IN POLISH TRANSLATIONS OF BRITISH AND AMERICAN PRESS ARTICLES UNDER COMMUNIST RULE EDYTA ŹRAŁKA University of Silesia [email protected] Abstract The paper analyses selected Polish translations of British and American press articles published in the magazine Forum in the years 1965 – 1989. In communist Poland, all such texts were censored before publication, which forced the translators to avoid content and language that could be banned by censors and to adopt a specific style of expression known as Newspeak. The paper lists the linguistic phenomena in the target language that represent features typical of Newspeak and identifies manipulative procedures which led to their occurrence, using a corpus of 25 English texts and their Polish translations. Keywords: translation, manipulation, Newspeak, censorship, communist Poland 1. Introduction When the topic of Newspeak is raised in the context of the Polish language of speeches, slogans and publications of the communist times, what primarily comes to mind is ideological texts promoted in the mass media, praising the communist rule and socialist model of society. We normally ascribe the features of Newspeak to texts written in order to promote the communist authorities and their system of ruling by the followers of the system or according to imposed requirements, but in either case by authors living under the communist rule. We rarely realize that the language of Newspeak constituted an established system that had a considerable impact on the commonly used language, not only in texts originally written by authors who were following the requirements of the communist rule to allow publication of their works, but also – through translation – on contents coming from abroad and originally written by authors who had totally different attitudes and used a neutral, not ideologically- motivated, language.
    [Show full text]
  • 1984 Sparknotes Summary Book 2
    1984 SparkNotes Summary Book 2 Summary: Chapter I At work one morning, Winston walks toward the men’s room and notices the dark-haired girl with her arm in a sling. She falls, and when Winston helps her up, she passes him a note that reads “I love you.” Winston tries desperately to figure out the note’s meaning. He has long suspected that the dark-haired girl is a political spy monitoring his behavior, but now she claims to love him. Before Winston can fully comprehend this development, Parsons interrupts him with talk about his preparations for Hate Week. The note from the dark-haired girl makes Winston feel a sudden, powerful desire to live. After several days of nervous tension during which he does not speak to her, Winston manages to sit at the same lunchroom table as the girl. They look down as they converse to avoid being noticed, and plan a meeting in Victory Square where they will be able to hide from the telescreens amid the movement of the crowds. They meet in the square and witness a convoy of Eurasian prisoners being tormented by a venomous crowd. The girl gives Winston directions to a place where they can have their tryst, instructing him to take a train from Paddington Station to the countryside. They manage to hold hands briefly. Summary: Chapter II Executing their plan, Winston and the girl meet in the country. Though he has no idea what to expect, Winston no longer believes that the dark-haired girl is a spy. He worries that there might be microphones hidden in the bushes, but feels reassured by the dark-haired girl’s evident experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Doublespeak? Sustainability in the Arctic—A Text Mining Analysis of Norwegian Parliamentary Speeches
    sustainability Article Doublespeak? Sustainability in the Arctic—A Text Mining Analysis of Norwegian Parliamentary Speeches Mikko Moilanen * and Stein Østbye School of Business and Economics, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper contributes to the recent literature on sustainability in the Arctic as a political concept. Parliamentary proceedings have increasingly been recognized as an important source of information for eliciting political issues. In this paper, we use unsupervised text mining techniques to analyze parliamentary speeches for Norway from the period from 2009 to 2016 to answer whether political coalitions talk differently about sustainability in the Arctic depending on being in opposition or government. We find that the difference between being in government and opposition, controlling for political label (left-right), is far more important than the difference between left and right, con- trolling for role (opposition-government). The results suggest that in the trade-off between political preferences and election success, the balance is tilted in favour of the latter. Our interpretation is that opportunistic behavior seems to dominate partisan behavior in the politics related to sustainability in the Arctic. Keywords: text mining: sustainability; arctic; partisan theory Citation: Moilanen, M.; Østbye, S. Doublespeak? Sustainability in the 1. Introduction Arctic—A Text Mining Analysis of Do political parties talk differently about sustainability in the Arctic and differently Norwegian Parliamentary Speeches. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9397. https:// depending on being in opposition or government? In this paper we throw some light doi.org/10.3390/su13169397 on these questions using text-based quantitative analysis of parliamentary speeches for Norway from the period 2009 to 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 1984 Reading Schedule & Questions
    1984 Reading Schedule & Questions Due Date (Monday/Tuesday) Chapters Pages April 11th/12th Book 1: 2-5 Pg. 20-55 (35) April 18th/19th Book 1: 6-8 Pg. 55-87 (32) April 25th/26th Book 2: 1-4 Pg. 88-122 (34) May 2nd/3rd Book 2: 5-9 Pg. 122-151 (29) May 9th/10th Book 2: 9-10 Pg. 152-185 (33) May 16th/17th Book 3: 1-2 Pg. 186-215 (29) May 23rd/24th Book 3: 4-6 Pg. 215-245 (30) Reading quizzes and in-class discussions may only be made up if you had an excused absence. You will have one week to make them up. If your absence is unexcused, you will receive a zero for any missed quizzes and discussions. In addition to your reading, you will complete study guide questions to go with the assigned chapters. Those will be collected at the beginning of class for each due date. To receive full credit, answers must be written legibly and in complete sentences. If you are absent, they must be turned in the day you return to class. Book One, Chapter 1 1. What bothers Winston? What is wrong with his society? 2. What are the three slogans of the Inner Party? What are the four ministries? 3. How does the Two Minute Hate work? What happens to Winston during the chant? 4. What happens between O’Brien and Winston? 5. What is "thoughtcrime"? What are the Thought Police? 6. Who is Emmanuel Goldstein? Book One, Chapters 2-5 1. Who is Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1984 – Propaganda Poster Assignment
    1984 Propaganda Hello comrades. As a member of the Party, it is your task to communicate to the citizens of your great nation their responsibilities to our version of Big Brother. What is our version? Corporate greed? Political agendas? Government rule? Building a wall? Your Assignment: In groups of no more than six, create a propaganda poster for “The Party” from this day and age (the year you’re living in now). You and your comrades are working for the Ministry of Truth and are in charge of making posters for Hate Week. This is a big deal! You need to get the people to hate something as much as you can, or to love Big Brother and The Party. You may also choose to do corporate slogans. The Alternative: Same as above, except replace “The Party” with “The Resistance”. You work for the resistance in awakening the population to some truth about our world. Your task is to awaken the population to the things that control everything from our personal habits such as what we consume, to how we are expected to comport ourselves in the world. Your digital or paper poster should have: An illustration or graphic. If hand drawn, then great. If your own digital picture, fine. If from the internet, make sure you’ve doctored it, or created a collage of some sort. A message or slogan of the party or resistance The purpose of this poster is to present one concept that is valued or hated in our great civilization. This assignment tests your general understanding and comprehension of '1984' It is primarily focused on the general ideas and philosophies of how we are all controlled in some way, and the ways we can awaken to this (legally and with respect for other beliefs).
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteen Eighty-Four
    Nineteen Eighty-Four This article is about the Orwell novel. For other uses, see 1984 (disambiguation). Nineteen Eighty-Four, sometimes published as 1984, is a dystopian novel by English author George Orwell pub- lished in 1949.[1][2] The novel is set in Airstrip One (for- merly known as Great Britain), a province of the super- state Oceania in a world of perpetual war, omnipresent government surveillance and public manipulation, dic- tated by a political system euphemistically named English Socialism (or Ingsoc in the government’s invented lan- guage, Newspeak) under the control of a privileged Inner Party elite, that persecutes individualism and independent thinking as "thoughtcrimes".[3] The tyranny is epitomised by Big Brother, the quasi- divine Party leader who enjoys an intense cult of per- sonality but who may not even exist. The Party “seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power.”[4] The protagonist of the novel, Winston Smith, is a member of the Outer Party, who works for the Ministry of Truth (or Minitrue), which is responsible for propaganda and historical revisionism. His job is to rewrite past newspa- per articles, so that the historical record always supports A 1947 draft manuscript of the first page of Nineteen Eighty- the party line.[5] Smith is a diligent and skillful worker Four, showing the editorial development. but he secretly hates the Party and dreams of rebellion against Big Brother. As literary political fiction and dystopian science-fiction, his unforgiving novel” in 1944, the implications of divid- Nineteen Eighty-Four is a classic novel in content, plot ing the world up into Zones of influence that had been con- and style.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism in Central Europe
    Organiser: Objectives of this book are: The Association for International Affairs (AMO) is a Czech non-govern- ■ To examine the factors that feed the contemporary populist facet of Central European politics. mental organization that conducts research, and hosts educational pro- ■ To critically analyze the concept of populism: Is populism an inherent feature of politics? grams in the fields of international affairs, foreign policy and security ■ To discuss the historical and ideological roots of Central European populism: What has influenced studies. AMO, established in 1995, the formation of populism in Central Europe? is currently one of the leading institu- With kind support of: tions of its kind in the Czech ■ To ask whether the features shared by the Central European states outweigh their differences and Republic. whether there is such phenomenon as "Central European populism". The Research Center of AMO pro- Václav Nekvapil and Maria Staszkiewicz (editors) vides independent expert analyses, supports discussions at various levels and provides solutions for these issues. EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND IN PRAGUE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC POPULISM IN CENTRAL EUROPE Populism in Central Europe Editors: Václav Nekvapil and Maria Staszkiewicz Compiled by: Vendula Peisertová, Jiří Bednář, Lauren Trigero, Adéla Jurečková, Jitka Jurková, Lenka Ryjáčková and Vlaďka Votavová Translations: Gwendolyn Albert (Eva van de Rakt: Opening Remarks; Marie Gailová: Populism in the Context of "the Roma Question"; Jiří Musil: Reflections on Czech Populism; Václav Nekvapil: Populism and the Role of Political Parties in the Czech Republic and Lukáš Benda: Populism in Contemporary Hungarian Politics) Designed by: Tomáš Barčík – design studio Printed by: BCS, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Language As Political Control: Newspeak Revisited
    Language as Political Control: Newspeak Revisited Jonathan Pool Department of Political Science University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 Bernard Grofman School of Social Sciences University of California, Irvine Irvine, California 92717 Prepared for delivery at the 1984 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Ass ociation, Washington, D. C., 30 August to 2 September, 1984. Copyright by the American Political Science Association. Pool & Grofman i Language as Political Control ABSTRACT Could a state make its citizens speak and write a language like Newspeak, described by Orwell in 1984? Would the use of su ch a language suppress the population's ability to-reason about politics? Newspeak is a language created by grafting the morphology of Esperanto onto the sy ntax, semantics, and style of bureaucratic English. The derivation and inflection of words are very regular, simple, and productive; words are etymo­ logically disassociated and easy to pronounce; meanings are controlled; synonyms are eliminated; and cliches and monotonous speech are legitimized. The evidence largely supports the belief that a language like Newspeak could be successfully ad opted for or by a speech community. Communities have accepted such language reforms with little coercion when proposed by states, voluntary associations, and individuals. Preliminary evidence does not, however, support the belief that a language like Newspeak would impair the capacity for political reasoning. Persons using a language with features of Newspeak maintain their ability to resist verbal manipulation. When such a language is officialized, it also reduces ethnic and elite-mass linguistic gaps. In important ways, Newspeak represents a new linguistic technology of political equality and liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • Dystopian Language and Thought: the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Applied to Created Forms of English
    DePauw University Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University Student research Student Work 2014 Dystopian Language and Thought: The aS pir- Whorf Hypothesis Applied to Created Forms of English Kristen Fairchild Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.depauw.edu/studentresearch Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Fairchild, Kristen, "Dystopian Language and Thought: The aS pir-Whorf Hypothesis Applied to Created Forms of English" (2014). Student research. Paper 7. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Work at Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly and Creative Work from DePauw University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Dystopian Language and Thought: The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Applied to Created Forms of English Kristen Fairchild DePauw University Honor Scholar 401-402: Senior Thesis April 11, 2014 2 3 Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge and thank my three committee members for their guidance and encouragement through this process. Additionally, a special thanks to my advisor, Istvan Csicsery-Ronay Ph.D, for all his extra time and support. 4 5 Introduction The genre of science fiction is a haven for the creation of new worlds, universes, and projections of the future. Many versions of the future represent dystopian societies. While the word dystopia often evokes images of hellish landscapes or militarized super-cities, the word dystopia simply implies “a dis-placement of our reality.”1 Dystopias usually originate from social or political conditions of the present.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of Orwell's Oligarchic Collectivism As an Economic System
    E U I W 0 R K I N G P A P E R N° 85/161 I i A CRITIQUE OF ORWELL'S OLIGARCHIC COLLECTIVISM AS AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM by ~ Domenico Mario NUT! 320 EUI 320 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUT~ DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS 8UI E U I W 0 R K I N G P A P E R N° 85/161 A CRITIQUE OF ORWELL'S OLIGARCHIC COLLECTIVISM AS AN ECONOMIC SYSTEM by ~ Domenico Mario NUT! Forthcoming in: Coexistence: A Review of East-West and Development Issues, 1985. BADIA FIESOLANA, SAN DOMENICO DI FIESOLE All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any fo~ without permission of the authors. (C) Domenico Mario Nuti Printed in Italy in April 1985 European University Institute Badia Fiesolana 50016 SAN DOMENICO (Fi) Italy. Summary This paper assesses the consistency, efficiency and viability of the economic system implicit and explicit in Orwell's Nineteen Eighty­ Four. The first section illustrates the main features of Orwell's model: (its geopolitics, the convergence to a single system, ownership, planning, markets and prices, information, statistics, resources, technology, trade, public policy, permanent warfare) and its internal dynamics. The second section provides a critique, based on the implausibility of the whole if not of the parts of the model, the uni-dimensionality and indivisibility of Orwell's notion of power, the informational inefficiency of the system, the unwarranted extension of the results of the model to a three-players game between the superstates, technological regress, the lack of micro­ foundations, the economic position of .Puter Party.members, the dehumani­ sation of the working class.
    [Show full text]