Copper River Delta Institute, P.O
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fishing in the Cordova Area
Southcentral Region Department of Fish and Game Fishing in the Cordova Area About Cordova Cordova is a small commercial fishing town (pop. 2,500) on the southeastern side of Prince William Sound, 52 air miles southeast of Valdez and 150 air miles southeast of Anchorage. The town can be reached only by air or by ferries. Check the Alaska Marine Highway website for more informa- tion about the ferries: www.dot.state.ak.us/amhs Alaska Natives originally settled the area around the Copper River Delta. The town of Cordova changed its name from Puerto Cordova in 1906 when the railroad was built to move copper ore. Commercial fishing has been a major industry The Scott River for Cordova since the 1940s, so please be careful around their boats and nets. The Division of Commercial Hotels, fishing charters, camping Fisheries offers a wealth of information on their website, For information about fishing charters, accommoda- including in-season harvest information at www.adfg. tions and other services in Cordova, contact the Chamber alaska.gov . of Commerce and Visitor’s Center at P.O. Box 99, Cordova, Bears are numerous in the Cordova area and anglers Alaska, 99574, (907) 424-7260 or cordovachamber.com. The should use caution when fishing salmon spawning areas. City of Cordova also runs an excellent website at www. Check the ADF&G website for the “Bear Facts” brochure, cityofcordova.net . or request one from the ADF&G Anchorage regional of- fice. Anglers who fillet fish along a river are encouraged to chop up the fish carcass and throw the pieces into fast Management of Alaska’s flowing water. -
Regulation Summary and Access for the Chitina
Regulation Summary & you have fished or not, and whether you harvested Recording & Marking Catch fish or not. ONLINE HARVEST REPORTING: Both tips of the tail must be removed and all salmon Access for the Chitina http://fish.alaska.gov/PU. Failure to report is in taken must be recorded on the permit immediately Subdistrict Personal violation of 5 AAC 77.015(c), and is subject to a $200 with the date fished and catch by species, prior fine and loss of future personal use fishing privileges. to leaving the fishing site and before fish are Use Salmon Fishery concealed from plain view (5 AAC 77.591 (d)). For the purposes of this fishery, immediately“ ” Where Is the Chitina Subdistrict? Online permits and harvest reporting: means before concealing the fish from plain view The fishery is restricted to the waters of the mainstem http://fish.alaska.gov/PU or transporting the salmon from the fishing site. Copper River between the downstream edge of the “Fishing site” means the location where the fish Fishery opening recordings: Chitina-McCarthy Bridge and ADF&G regulatory is removed from the water and becomes part of the markers located about 200 yards upstream of Haley Glennallen: (907) 822-5224 permit holder’s bag limit. Creek. All tributaries of the Copper River in this area, Fairbanks: (907) 459-7382 including the Chitina River, are closed to personal use Personal Use Harvested Fish Anchorage: (907) 267-2511 fishing(map on reverse). Personal use harvested fish (including eggs) cannot ADF&G Chitina dip net website: be bought, sold, traded or bartered. -
Classification of Natural and Semi-Natural Vegetation
To appear as Chapter 4 in J. Franklin and E. van der Maarel, eds. 2012. Vegetation Ecology. Second edition. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Classification of natural and semi‐natural vegetation Robert K. Peet and David W. Roberts 4.1 Introduction Vegetation classification has been an active field of scientific research since well before the origin of the word ecology and has remained so through to the present day. As with any field active for such a long period, the conceptual underpinnings as well as the methods employed, the products generated and the applications expected have evolved considerably. Our goal in this chapter is to provide an introductory guide to participation in the modern vegetation classification enterprise, as well as suggestions on how to use and interpret modern vegetation classifications. The historical development of classification and the associated evolution of community concepts is provided by van der Maarel & Franklin in Chapter 1, and Austin describes numerical methods for community analysis in Chapter 2. While we present some historical and conceptual context, our goal in this chapter is to help the reader learn how create, interpret and use modern vegetation classifications, particularly those based on large‐scale surveys. 4.1.1 Why classify? Early vegetation classification efforts were driven largely by a desire to understand the natural diversity of vegetation and the factors that create and sustain it. Vegetation classification is critical to basic scientific research as a tool for organizing and interpreting information and placing that information in context. To conduct or publish ecological research without reference to the type of community the work was conducted in is very much like depositing a specimen in a museum without providing a label. -
Shrubland Ecotones Proceedings RMRS-P-11 September1999 Abstract
Some pages in this file were created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. United States Department of Agriculture Proceedings: Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Shrubland Ecotones Proceedings RMRS-P-11 September1999 Abstract McArthur, E. Durant; Ostler, W. Kent; Wambolt, Carl L., comps. 1999. Proceedings: shrubland ecotones; 1998 August 12–14; Ephraim, UT. Proc. RMRS-P-11. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 299 p. The 51 papers in this proceedings include an introductory keynote paper on ecotones and hybrid zones and a final paper describing the mid-symposium field trip as well as collections of papers on ecotones and hybrid zones (15), population biology (6), community ecology (19), and community rehabilitation and restoration (9). All of the papers focus on wildland shrub ecosystems; 14 of the papers deal with one aspect or another of sagebrush (subgenus Tridentatae of Artemisia) ecosystems. The field trip consisted of descriptions of biology, ecology, and geology of a big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) hybrid zone between two subspecies (A. tridentata ssp. tridentata and A. t. ssp. vaseyana) in Salt Creek Canyon, Wasatch Mountains, Uinta National Forest, Utah, and the ecotonal or clinal vegetation gradient of the Great Basin Experimental Range, Manti-La Sal National Forest, Utah, together with its historical significance. The papers were presented at the 10th Wildland Shrub Symposium: Shrubland Ecotones, at Snow College, Ephraim, UT, August 12–14, 1998. Keywords: wildland shrubs, ecotone, hybrid zone, population biology, community ecology, restoration, rehabilitation. Acknowledgments The symposium, field trip, and subsequent publication of these proceedings were facilitated by many people and organizations. -
Chugach National Forest 2016 Visitor Guide
CHUGACH NATIONAL FOREST 2016 VISITOR GUIDE CAMPING WILDILFE VISITOR CENTERS page 10 page 12 page 15 Welcome Get Out and Explore! Hop on a train for a drive-free option into the Chugach National Forest, plan a multiple day trip to access remote to the Chugach National Forest! primitive campsites, attend the famous Cordova Shorebird Festival, or visit the world-class interactive exhibits Table of Contents at Begich, Boggs Visitor Center. There is something for everyone on the Chugach. From the Kenai Peninsula to The Chugach National Forest, one of two national forests in Alaska, serves as Prince William Sound, to the eastern shores of the Copper River Delta, the forest is full of special places. Overview ....................................3 the “backyard” for over half of Alaska’s residents and is a destination for visi- tors. The lands that now make up the Chugach National Forest are home to the People come from all over the world to experience the Chugach National Forest and Alaska’s wilderness. Not Eastern Kenai Peninsula .......5 Alaska Native peoples including the Ahtna, Chugach, Dena’ina, and Eyak. The only do we welcome international visitors, but residents from across the state travel to recreate on Chugach forest’s 5.4 million acres compares in size with the state of New Hampshire and National Forest lands. Whether you have an hour or several days there are options galore for exploring. We have Prince William Sound .............7 comprises a landscape that includes portions of the Kenai Peninsula, Prince Wil- listed just a few here to get you started. liam Sound, and the Copper River Delta. -
Alaska's Copper River: Humankind in a Changing World
United States Department of Agriculture Alaska’s Copper River: Forest Service Humankind in a Changing World Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-480 July 2000 Technical Editors Harriet H. Christensen is research social scientist (formerly director of the Copper River Delta Institute), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific North- west Research Station, 4043 Roosevelt Way, Seattle, WA 98105-6497; Louise Mastrantonio is a consultant, Portland, OR; John C. Gordon is Pinchot professor, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 205 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511; and Bernard T. Bormann is a research plant physiologist and ecologist and team leader, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331. See detailed map of the Copper River Delta in pocket on inside back cover. Alaska’s Copper River: Humankind in a Changing World Harriet H. Christensen, Louise Mastrantonio, John C. Gordon, and Bernard T. Bormann Technical Editors U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-480 July 2000 Abstract Christensen, Harriet H.; Mastrantonio, Louise; Gordon, John C.; Bormann, Bernard T., tech. eds. 2000. Alaska’s Copper River: humankind in a changing world. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-480. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 20 p. Opportunities for natural and social science research were assessed in the Copper River ecosystem including long-term, integrated studies of ecosystem structure and function. The ecosystem is one where change, often rapid, cataclysmic change, is the rule rather than the exception. -
Floristic-Phytosociological Approach, Potential Natural Vegetation, and Survival of Prejudice
173-182-Ladislav Mucina_Maquetación 1 14/01/11 11:04 Página 173 LAZAROA 31: 173-182. 2010 doi:10.5209/rev_LAZA.2010.v31.13 ISSN: 0210-9778 Floristic-phytosociological approach, potential natural vegetation, and survival of prejudice Ladislav Mucina (*) Abstract: Mucina, L. 2010. Floristic-phytosociological approach, potential natural vegetation, and survival of prejudice. Lazaroa 31: 173-182 (2010). Carrión & Fernandez (2009; further C&F) in a recent commentary on a paper published in Journal of Biogeography criticised an obvious mismatch between the predictions about the patterns of potential natural vegetation (PNV) made by phytosociologists, and those underpinned by pollen data. C&F used this stage to take a broad sway on phytosociology in general (stopping only very short of denying it status of science), blaming power of tradition and influence of personal cult for ignoring scientific evidence. In my response I show that C&F have misinterpreted the concept of PNV, rendering their comparisons irrelevant. C&F obviously overslept the progress descriptive vegetation science made in recent decades, relegating their heavy criticism of phytosociology into the realm of prejudice. Keywords: descriptive vegetation science, phytosociology, personality, potential natural vegetation, reconstructed natural vegetation, Spain, vegetation mapping Resumen: Mucina, L. 2010. Supervivencia de prejuicios en el concepto de vegetación potencial natural, y en las aproxi- maciones florística-fitosociológica. Lazaroa 31: 173-182 (2010). Carrión y Fernández (2009; C&F) en un comentario recientemente publicado en Journal of Biogeography han criticado la falta de relación entre las predicciones que sobre modelos de vegetación natural potencial (PNV) han hecho los fitoso- ciólogos, y aquellas sostenidas por datos polínicos, utilizando este hecho para hacer una crítica amplia y general de la fi- tosociología, negándola, aunque de forma breve, el estatus de ciencia. -
Fisheries Proposal FP21-14 DRAFT Staff Analysis
FP21-14 Executive Summary General Description Proposal FP21-14 requests that the Board prohibit use of onboard devices that indicate bathymetry and/or fish locations (fish finders) while fishing from boats or other watercraft in the Upper Copper River. Submitted by: Kirk Wilson. Proposed Regulation §_____.27(e)(11) Prince William Sound Area (xi) The following apply to Upper Copper River District subsistence salmon fishing permits: *** (H) While you are fishing from a boat or other watercraft, you may not have onboard any device that indicates bathymetry and/or fish locations (i.e. fish finders). OSM Preliminary Conclusion Oppose Southcentral Alaska Subsistence Regional Advisory Council Rec- ommendation Interagency Staff Committee Comments ADF&G Comments Written Public Comments 5 Support DRAFT STAFF ANALYSIS FP21-14 ISSUES Proposal FP21-14, submitted by Kirk Wilson of Glennallen, requests that the Federal Subsistence Board (Board) prohibit use of onboard devices that indicate bathymetry and/or fish locations (fish finders) while fishing from boats or other watercraft in the Upper Copper River. DISCUSSION The proponent states that the use of electronic devices that indicate bathymetry and/or fish locations (i.e. fish finders) is contributing to unsustainable harvest practices on the Upper Copper River. According to the proponent, these devices enable fishers to locate and target specific holding areas in the river, which may serve as pooling areas for sensitive stock. It is the proponent’s belief that if we do not address this issue, we -
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Chugach National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Chugach National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. -
Phytosociological Analysis and Species Diversity of Herbaceous Layer in Rashad and Alabassia Localities, South Kordofan State, Sudan
Volume 8, Number 2, June .2015 ISSN 1995-6673 JJBS Pages 151 - 157 Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences Phytosociological Analysis and Species Diversity of Herbaceous Layer in Rashad and Alabassia Localities, South Kordofan State, Sudan Ismail M. Ismail1* and Alawia A. ELawad2 1 Forestry Research Centre, Agricultural Research Corporation, P.O. Box 7089; 2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, AlNeelain University, Khartoum, P.O. Box 12702, Sudan. Received: January 23, 2015 Revised: March 8, 2015 Accepted: March 17, 2015 Abstract The objective of the present study is to analyze the phytosociological characteristics and the diversity patterns of herbaceous plants in Rashad and Alabassia localities. The study was conducted in selected 14 vegetation sites. Important Value Index (IVI) was used to estimate the phytosociological characteristics, the Shannon index to measure the plant diversity and the Pielou index for species evenness. During the study period, a total of 48 species, representing 42 genera from 20 families, were recorded. The phytosociological characteristics revealed that Tetrapogon cenchriformis dominated herbaceous species in sites 1, 7, 10, 11 with IVI values 139.3, 113, 70.3 and 95.8, respectively, followed by Spermacoce pusilla dominating sites 3, 4, 5 and 6 with IVI values 65.1, 50.4, 104.2 and 133.5, respectively. The distribution pattern revealed that 87.5% species showed aggregated distribution, while 12.5% were randomly distributed. The highest density was 110 plants/m2 recorded in site 4. Species richness varied through different sites; the highest number of species was 19, recorded in site 2. The highest values of Shannon diversity index and evenness index were in site 12. -
West Copper River Delta Landscape Assessment Cordova Ranger District Chugach National Forest 03/18/2003 Updated 04/19/2007
West Copper River Delta Landscape Assessment Cordova Ranger District Chugach National Forest 03/18/2003 updated 04/19/2007 Copper River Delta – circa 1932 – photo courtesy of Perry Davis Team: Susan Kesti - Team Leader, writer-editor, vegetation Milo Burcham – Wildlife resources, Subsistence Bruce Campbell – Lands, Special Uses Dean Davidson – Soils, Geology Rob DeVelice – Succession, Ecology Carol Huber – Minerals, Geology, Mining Tim Joyce – Fish subsistence Dirk Lang – Fisheries Bill MacFarlane – Hydrology, Water Quality Dixon Sherman – Recreation Linda Yarborough – Heritage Resources Table of Contents Executive Summary...........................................................................................vi Chapter 1 – Introduction ....................................................................................1 Purpose.............................................................................................................1 The Analysis Area .............................................................................................1 Legislative History .............................................................................................3 Relationship to the revised Chugach Land and Resource Management Plan...4 Chapter 2 – Analysis Area Description .............................................................7 Physical Characteristics ....................................................................................7 Location .........................................................................................................7 -
Geobotany Studies
Geobotany Studies Basics, Methods and Case Studies Editor Franco Pedrotti University of Camerino Via Pontoni 5 62032 Camerino Italy Editorial Board: S. Bartha, Va´cra´tot, Hungary F. Bioret, University of Brest, France E. O. Box, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA A. Cˇ arni, Slovenian Academy of Sciences, Ljubljana (Slovenia) K. Fujiwara, Yokohama City University, Japan D. Gafta, “Babes-Bolyai” University Cluj-Napoca (Romania) J. Loidi, University of Bilbao, Spain L. Mucina, University of Perth, Australia S. Pignatti, Universita degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, Italy R. Pott, University of Hannover, Germany A. Vela´squez, Centro de Investigacion en Scie´ncias Ambientales, Morelia, Mexico R. Venanzoni, University of Perugia, Italy For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/10526 About the Series The series includes outstanding monographs and collections of papers on a given topic in the following fields: Phytogeography, Phytosociology, Plant Community Ecology, Biocoenology, Vegetation Science, Eco-informatics, Landscape Ecology, Vegetation Mapping, Plant Conservation Biology and Plant Diversity. Contributions are expected to reflect the latest theoretical and methodological developments or to present new applications at broad spatial or temporal scales that could reinforce our understanding of ecological processes acting at the phytocoenosis and landscape level. Case studies based on large data sets are also considered, provided that they support refinement of habitat classification, conservation of plant diversity, or