DOCSLIB.ORG

W. Green Professional Catalogue 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
W. Green Professional Catalogue 2011 THE W. GREEN PROFESSIONAL CATALOGUE 2011 W. Green & Son, 21 Alva St, Edinburgh, EH2 4PS Telephone: 0131 225 4879 Facsimile: 0131 225 2104 Email: [email protected] REUTERS/Eliseo Fernandez PLACE YOUR ORDER TODAY! W. GREEN P W. You can place your book and subscription order through the following: W. GREEN Online sweetandmaxwell.co.uk Trade customers R OF PROFESSIONAL CATALOGUE 2011 Tel: 0845 082 1032 / Fax: 020 7449 1133 E SSIO Email: [email protected] N Direct customers AL CATALOGU Book and Subscription Orders and Information Tel: 0845 600 9355 / Fax: 020 7393 8051 Email: [email protected] International E 2011 2011 Tel: +44 (0)1264 388560 Fax: +44 (0)20 7393 8077 Email: [email protected] W_Green_catalogue_2011:Layout 1 09/03/2011 11:28 Page i W. GREEN COMPLETE CATALOGUE 2011 W_Green_catalogue_2011:Layout 1 09/03/2011 11:28 Page iii WELCOME TO THE W. GREEN COMPLETE CATALOGUE 2011 iii Dear Professional Welcome to the W. Green Complete Catalogue for 2011. 2010 signified another year of turbulent conditions for many industries, but despite the challenging environment, Greens continued to push ahead, creating new products for Scotland’s legal professionals. Some of the 2010 highlights include the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010 published to coincide with the enforcement of the Act, authored by Fraser Davidson, David Bartos and Hew Dundas. 2010 also saw the publication of Professors Gerry Maher and Barry Rodger’s Civil Jurisdiction in the Scottish Courts, the first text on this subject since Duncan & Dykes in 1911. Further key publications include the 3rd edition of Neil Collar’s Planning, a 4th edition of Adoption of Children in Scotland and a 2nd edition of John Kerrigan’s popular Drafting for Succession. W. Green’s partnership with the Scottish Universities Law Institute continued with the December publication of Confidentiality, Personality and Privacy in the SULI series. 2011 is shaping up to be an important year for new W. Green books. Anton & Beaumont’s Private International Law, 3rd edition by Paul Beaumont and Peter McEleavy will publish in December. We are also pleased to announce new editions of Cohabitation; Scottish Trusts: A Drafting Guide and Gretton & Reid’s Conveyancing. Mirroring the current financial climate we also have new editions of Bankruptcy, The Law of Corporate Insolvency and a brand new title; Scottish Debt Recovery: A Practical Guide. 2010 was again a year of positive development for Westlaw UK Scots Law. The Novus platform was rolled out to users, greatly enhancing the system’s functionality, making it quicker and easier to find information. On the contents side, 2010 saw key additions of Session Cases ® PDFs dating back to 1898 as well as Scottish Criminal Law, our monthly criminal cases reports series. Westlaw UK Scots Law is an ever developing system and we continue to listen to customer needs to move forward throughout 2011 and beyond. Free demonstrations and trials of our online services, including Westlaw UK Scots Law and Westlaw UK, can be provided by our Westlaw team. Just call 0800 028 2200, email [email protected] or log on to www.westlaw.co.uk. In addition to product information you can find all the W. Green details you will need within these pages, including commissioning, editorial, marketing and customer services contacts. Finally I would like to say thank you to all our customers for their continued support throughout 2010. I and everyone at W. Green wish you a very successful 2011. Gilly Grant, Director [email protected] W_Green_catalogue_2011:Layout 1 09/03/2011 11:28 Page iv ABOUT W. GREEN | CONTACT INFORMATION iv COMMISSIONING W. Green & Son INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMERS The commissioning team evaluates proposals The Scottish Law Publisher for new products, working with authors to 21 Alva Street Orders and Information: develop their ideas and to help them to Edinburgh W. Green/Sweet & Maxwell manage the writing process. The team is also EH2 4PS Cheriton House happy to receive unsolicited manuscripts. North Way DX: 238 Edinburgh 1 Andover Contact our Publisher, Janet Campbell, if you LP: 48 Edinburgh 2 Hants UK, SP10 5BE have an idea for a new product, or complete a copy of our Publishing Proposal Form, Tel: (0131) 225 4879 Tel: Export Customers: +44 (0)1264 388560 which can be found on our website at Fax: (0131) 225 2104 Import Customers: +44 (0)1264 388570 www.wgreen.thomson.com. www.wgreen.co.uk Fax: +44 (0) 207 388077 (for orders only) Fax: +44 (0) 207 3938074 (for queries only) Orders, Distribution and Accounts: EDITORIAL Orders email: Our editorial department is highly Sweet & Maxwell sweetandmaxwell.international.orders experienced and our legal editors and law PO Box 2000 @thomson.com (for orders only) reporters are trained to deal with the Andover UK, SP10 9AH particular needs of legal texts. Our legal email: editors project manage the process by Customer Services: sweetandmaxwell.international.queries editing legal material and co-ordinating Tel: 0845 600 9355 @thomson.com (for queries only) indexers, tablers, typesetters and printers. Fax: 020 7393 8051 Our experienced team of law reporters email: produce Scots Law Times and Greens sweetandmaxwell.customer.services@ OTHER SWEET & MAXWELL GROUP Weekly Digest, as well as a suite of specialist thomson.com UK ADDRESSES: law reports. Trade Customers Only: Sweet & Maxwell Group Contact our Head of Editorial Operations, Tel: 0845 082 1032 Cheriton House Rebecca Standing, if you require further Fax: 020 7393 8051 North Way information about any aspect of our email: Andover editorial and production processes. [email protected] Hants SP10 5BE DX: 120 950 Andover 5 MARKETING Trade Sales Representation In Scotland: W. Green aims to involve its authors closely Barbara Gerken Sweet & Maxwell (Yorkshire) in the promotion of their work by seeking 2 Spring Terrace The Hatchery advice from authors on all marketing Goodshawfold Hall Bank Lane opportunities. The remit of our Marketing Loveclough Mytholmroyd Department also includes market research, Rossendale Hebden Bridge sales forecasting, subscription renewal Lancashire West Yorkshire activities, website development, public BB4 8QR HX7 5HQ relations, book jacket design and, of course, Tel/fax: 01706 222899 the promotion of all our products and Mobile: 07771 506897 DX: 715966 Hebden Bridge 2 services. Tel: 01422 888000 Fax: 01422 888001 Contact our Market Manager, Alan Bett, for further information about any marketing Thomson Reuters Professional issues, including sponsorship and advertising. (Ireland) Limited 43 Fitzwilliam Place Dublin 2 SALES Ireland We have an experienced sales team working on both our print and online products. Tel: 00 353 1 662 5301 Fax: 00 353 1 662 5302 Sarah Keating is the Sales Manager working with customers in Scotland. Sarah is happy to answer questions and place orders for all products including Westlaw UK Scots Law and is available by calling 020 739 37493 or on email at [email protected] W_Green_catalogue_2011:Layout 1 09/03/2011 11:28 Page v ORDERING INFORMATION AND CUSTOMER CARE v At W. Green we consider effective customer price list at the time of despatch of the UPDATING SERVICES care to be of paramount importance. We product/service, as published on our website have a dedicated team of advisors on hand unless the order is subject to a specific offer Supplements and New Editions to deal with your queries, or assist with in which case special terms may apply. Many titles have cumulative updating ordering products / services. supplements issued regularly. The customer service contact details are: TERMS OF TRADING To set up a Standing Order to receive All orders are accepted subject to our supplements or new editions immediately Customer Services Terms of Trading (available from on publication, please contact our customer W. Green / Sweet & Maxwell www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk or on request) services department. You will be charged for 100 Avenue Road and relevant Service Terms (for our CD and each product supplied under the Standing Swiss Cottage online services) which are available with the Order. You may cancel your Standing Order LONDON product/service (if not supplied to the at any time by writing to us at Sweet and NW3 3PF customer prior to placing the order) or are Maxwell, PO Box 1000, Andover, SP10 9AF DX: 38861 Swiss Cottage available on request to W. Green (tel: 0131 stating the Standing Order you wish to Telephone: 0845 603 8346 225 4879). cancel. Fax: 020 7393 8051 Email: sweetandmaxwell.customer.services@ Bound Volume Service (BVS) thomson.com SATISFACTION GUARANTEE For an additional charge we can supply you Where applicable you benefit from a 30-day with a hardbound and indexed volume CD Product Helpline satisfaction guarantee. containing all the journal issues in a Telephone support for purchasers of our subscription year — and you don’t have to CD products is available, Monday–Friday, Our customer promise means that if you are return our original issues. The BVS is 9.00am–5.30pm. For assistance, please not totally satisfied with the goods you have excellent value for money and an easy way contact: ordered you are protected under our 30-day to avoid misplaced individual parts. Telephone: 020 7393 7266 satisfaction guarantee. As long as the goods Fax: 020 7393 7945 are returned within 30 days of the date of Binders are also available for some the invoice, in good resaleable condition periodicals for a small additional cost, For information regarding additional user and according to our returns procedure, enabling subscribers to file and protect licenses, please contact the customer service your order will be cancelled and you will their loose issues. number above or your local Direct Sales owe nothing or will be refunded the price Executive. of the goods. Applicable in the UK and For further information and price details Europe only.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wednesday, 1 September 2021 PE1857: Regulate the Role of Curator Ad Litem Note by the Clerk
    CPPPC/S6/21/2/8 Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee 2nd Meeting, 2021 (Session 6) Wednesday, 1 September 2021 PE1857: Regulate the role of curator ad litem Note by the Clerk Petitioners Stephen Leighton Petition Calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government summary to regulate the curator ad litem and ensure historical claims of malpractice of curators ad litem in Scotland are investigated. Webpage https://petitions.parliament.scot/petitions/PE1857 Introduction 1. This is a new petition that was lodged on 18 February 2021. 2. A SPICe briefing has been prepared to inform the Committee’s consideration of the petition and can be found at Annexe A. 3. While not a formal requirement, petitioners have the option to collect signatures and comments on their petition. On this occasion, the petitioner elected not to collect this information. 4. The Session 5 Public Petitions Committee agreed to seek advanced views from the Scottish Government on all new petitions before they are formally considered. A response has been received from the Scottish Government and is included at Annexe B of this paper. 5. A submission has also been received from the petitioner and this is included at Annexe C. 1 CPPPC/S6/21/2/8 Scottish Government submission 6. The Scottish Government submission highlights that under the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) 2000 Act (AWI), the Sheriff has wide and flexible powers to deal with matters that come before the court in relation to the affairs of an adult with incapacity. This includes the power to appoint a curator ad litem in court proceedings where the adults with incapacity may not wish, or be able to appear in court themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Contact Proceedings for Children Affected by Domestic Abuse
    Child Contact Proceedings for Children Affected by Domestic Abuse A report to Scotland’s Commissioner for Children and Young People Fiona Morrison and E. Kay M. Tisdall, Centre for Research on Families and Relationships, University of Edinburgh Fiona Jones and Alison Reid, cl@n childlaw March 2013 Contents Commissioner’s Foreword v Acknowledgments vi 1 Introduction 1 Methodology 2 Definition of ‘domestic abuse’ 3 About this report Further information 4 2 International obligations: UNCRC and ECHR 5 2.1 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 5 2.2 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) 6 3 Legislative framework for disputed contact 8 3.1 Family actions: court orders in relation to parental responsibilities and rights 9 3.1.1 Best interests of the child in family actions 9 3.1.2 Views of the child in family actions 10 3.2 Children’s hearings proceedings: the current framework under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 14 3.2.1 Best interests of the child in children’s hearings proceedings 14 3.2.2 Views of the child in children’s hearings proceedings 16 3.3 Children’s hearings proceedings: the future framework under the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 19 3.3.1 Best interests of the child in children’s hearings proceedings – the future 19 3.3.2 Views of the child in children’s hearings proceedings – the future 19 3.4 Adoption and permanence orders 22 3.4.1 Best interests of the child in adoption and permanence orders 22 3.4.2 Views of the child in adoption and permanence orders
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Evaluation of the Rights, Status and Capacity of Distinct Categories of Individuals in Underdeveloped and Emerging Areas of Law
    A Critical Evaluation of the Rights, Status and Capacity of Distinct Categories of Individuals in Underdeveloped and Emerging Areas of Law Lesley-Anne Barnes Macfarlane LLB (Hons), Dip LP, PGCE, LLM A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Edinburgh Napier University, for the award of Doctor of Philosophy May 2014 1 Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisors, Dr Richard Whitecross and Dr Sandra Watson, for giving me their time, guidance and assistance in the writing up of my PhD Critical Appraisal of published works. I am indebted to my parents, Irene and Dennis, for a lifetime of love and support. Many thanks are also due to my family and friends for their ongoing care and companionship. In particular, I am very grateful to Professors Elaine E Sutherland and John P Grant for reading through and commenting on my section on Traditional Legal Research Methods. My deepest thanks are owed to my husband, Ross, who never fails in his love, encouragement and practical kindness. I confirm that the published work submitted has not been submitted for another award. ………………………………………… Lesley-Anne Barnes Macfarlane Citations and references have been drafted with reference to the University’s Research Degree Reference Guide 2 CONTENTS VOLUME I Abstract: PhD by Published Works Page 8 List of Evidence in Support of Thesis Page 9 Thesis Introduction Page 10 (I) An Era of Change in the Individual’s Rights, Status and Capacity in Scots Law (II) Conceptual Framework of Critical Analysis: Rights,
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Statutes
    Table of Statutes Commonwealth Constitution: 297 s 9: 296 Ch III: 5, 14, 15, 234, 363, 370, 372, 391, s 10: 296 397, 398, 404-406, 410 s 11: 296 s 1: 391, 422, 436 s 12: 17 s 7: 417, 422, 423, 425, 428, 429, 432, s 13: 296 436, 441 s 14: 296 s 8: 436 s 15: 17, 18, 296 s 15: 180, 193 s 15(1): 6 s 16: 436 Australia (Request and Consent) Act s 24: 416, 417, 422-425, 428, 429, 432, 1985: 296 436, 441 Australian Capital Territory (Self-Gov- s 29: 422 ernment) 1988 s 30: 422, 436 s 22: 66 s 49: 317 Broadcasting Act 1942 s 51: 65 Pt IIID: 426 s 51(xxix): 233 Builders Labourers Federation (Cancel- s 51(xxxi): 380 lation of Registration) Act 1986: 367, s 51(xxxv): 426 370 s 51(xxxvii): 3 Builders Labourers Federation (Cancel- s 51(xxxviii): 3, 281, 285, 287, 288 lation of Registration – Conse- s 53: 191 quential Provisions) Act 1986: 367 s 57: 185, 192 s 7: 368 s 61: 391 Builders Labourers Federation Legis- s 71: 14, 384, 391, 396, 397, 399 lation Amendment Act 1990: 389 s 73: 384 Commonwealth Electoral Act 1902: 422 s 74: 273 Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904: s 77(iii): 14, 384, 396, 399, 405 367 s 80: 380 Constitution Alteration (State Debts) Act s 90: 66, 67 1929: 142 s 92: 380 Customs Act 1901: 66 s 105A: 142, 144, 148 Financial Agreements (Commonwealth s 105A(3): 144 Liability) Act 1932: 143 s 105A(5): 144 Financial Agreements Enforcement Act s 106: 78, 79, 234, 352, 371, 432, 440 1932: 143, 146, 152, 157 s 107: 356, 357 Pt II: 144 s 116: 380 Financial Agreements (State Legislation) s 117: 380 Act 1932: 148 s 128: 18, 115-117, 429, 434
    [Show full text]
  • Defamation Act 2013 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 05 September 2021
    Changes to legislation: Defamation Act 2013 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 05 September 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Defamation Act 2013 2013 CHAPTER 26 An Act to amend the law of defamation. [25th April 2013] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Requirement of serious harm 1 Serious harm (1) A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant. (2) For the purposes of this section, harm to the reputation of a body that trades for profit is not “serious harm” unless it has caused or is likely to cause the body serious financial loss. Commencement Information I1 S. 1 in force at 1.1.2014 by S.I. 2013/3027, art. 2 Defences 2 Truth (1) It is a defence to an action for defamation for the defendant to show that the imputation conveyed by the statement complained of is substantially true. (2) Subsection (3) applies in an action for defamation if the statement complained of conveys two or more distinct imputations. 2 Defamation Act 2013 (c. 26) Document Generated: 2021-09-05 Changes to legislation: Defamation Act 2013 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 05 September 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Notes for Safeguarders on Court
    PRACTICE NOTES FOR SAFEGUARDERS ON COURT Part I PRACTICE POSITIONS including statements of practice expected from Safeguarders. Part II INFORMATION including relevant law, structures and roles relevant to court. Part III PRACTICE including step-by-step process and potential contributions. January 2019 PRACTICE NOTE FOR SAFEGUARDERS ON COURT FOREWORD Court proceedings are involved in the Children’s Hearings System to allow challenge to grounds or decisions that justify compulsory intervention in a child and a family’s life. The court is a different context to that of a Children’s Hearing. There is often a lot at stake for children and their families and it can be difficult to understand and participate in what are more formal processes. The Safeguarder has an important role to play in keeping the child at the centre and safeguarding the interests of the child during the child’s involvement in this part of the hearings system. The Safeguarder is the only role tasked exclusively with this focus. It is important that Safeguarders are able to perform their role to the highest of standards and in doing so, never lose sight of the individual child and their needs whilst these proceedings are ongoing. Practice Notes supplement the Practice Standards for Safeguarders by providing further clarity on the expectations of Safeguarder practice and conduct. 2 PRACTICE NOTE FOR SAFEGUARDERS ON COURT Contents PRACTICE NOTE ON COURT – PART I - PRACTICE POSITIONS ............................................................. 6 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFTING MATTERS! SECOND EDITION PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents
    SHAPING THE LAW OF SCOTLAND DRAFTING MATTERS! SECOND EDITION PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents Contents Introductory matters Foreword by the Lord Advocate, James Wolffe QC viii Preface to the second edition by Andy Beattie, Chief Parliamentary Counsel x Why drafting matters by Andy Beattie, Chief Parliamentary Counsel xi Background xiii Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO) xiii About this manual: status and use xiii Part 1: Drafting technique 1 Language 1 Plain language 1 Punctuation 1 Gender neutrality 2 Choice of language 2 Particular words and expressions 3 Style 7 Conjunctions 7 Paragraphing 8 Periods of time 9 Dates 11 Numbers and symbols 12 Letter labels (Tag letters (‘A’)) 13 Form and key components of Bills 15 Form and content of Scottish Parliament Bills 15 Presiding Officer’s recommendations as to style and content 15 Order of final provisions 17 Long title 18 Short title 19 Commencement provisions 19 Powers to make subordinate legislation 21 Form of subordinate legislation 23 Ancillary provision 24 Technicalities 26 Citation of enactments 26 Cross-references 26 Definitions 27 i PARLIAMENTARY COUNSEL OFFICE Contents Numbering 31 Schedules 33 Amendments and repeals 35 Textual amendments 35 Non-textual amendments 38 Formal headings and framework 38 Repeals 39 Specific legal expressions and terms 42 Referring to a Bill in another Bill 42 Referring to bodies corporate 42 Referring to the Scottish Ministers (individually and collectively) 42 Mode of trial 44 Referring to ‘charge’ and ‘proceedings’ 45 Types of court 45 Sheriffs and sheriff courts 45 Justice of the peace courts and relevant judicial officers 47 Part 2: Guidance on specific topics I.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland) Bill
    FACULTY OF ADVOCATES Response from the Faculty of Advocates The Children (Scotland) Bill The Faculty of Advocates, as the independent referral bar in Scotland, is pleased to offer its comments on the Children (Scotland) Bill. Part I of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995 was designed to provide a framework for parental responsibilities and parental rights, and for court orders about those responsibilities and rights. The proposed amendments change the nature of the law to introduce prescriptive provisions in respect of some aspects of a case, affording the decision maker less flexibility and narrowing the area in which discretion may be exercised. This is liable to promote disputes regarding what the legislation means, which may have the result of prolonging litigation, delaying resolution and thereby detracting from the best interests of the child. It is acknowledged that provisions with wide discretion can also have this effect. Voice of the child 1 The Faculty is supportive of the views of the child being heard and all appropriate methods being explored to enable that to happen. We note that the presumption that a child of 12 years or more is of sufficient age and maturity to form a view remains in the proposed section 11ZB(4), which appears to be inconsistent with the removal of the presumption elsewhere. The wording elsewhere in relation to the views of the child makes it mandatory for the judge to give a child the opportunity to express a view unless the judge is satisfied that the child is not capable of forming a view. The introduction of an express test of “capacity” is liable to result in additional litigation and promote the use of expert evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Sullivan: New Approaches in Australia, New Zealand and England
    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2002 Rethinking Sullivan: New Approaches in Australia, New Zealand and England Susanna Frederick Fischer The Catholic University, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Susanna Frederick Fischer, Rethinking Sullivan: New Approaches in Australia, New Zealand and England, 34 GEO. WASH. INT’L L. REV. 101 (2002). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RETHINKING SULLIVAN: NEW APPROACHES IN AUSTRALIA, NEW ZEALAND, AND ENGLAND SUSANNA FREDERICK FISCHER* "This is a difficult problem. No answer is perfect." - Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in Reynolds v. Times Newspapers1 SUMMARY This Article employs a comparative analysis of some important recent Commonwealth libel cases to analyze what has gone wrong with U.S. defa- mation law since New York Times v. Sullivan and to suggest a new direc- tion for its reform. In Lange v. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Lange v. Atkinson, and Reynolds v. Times Newspapers, the highest courts of the Australian, New Zealand, and English legal systems were con- fronted with the same challengefaced by the U.S. Supreme Court in New York Times v. Sullivan. They had to decide the proper constitutionalbal- ance between protection of reputation and protection of free expression in defamation actions brought by public officials over statements of fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Offenders (Scotland) Act 2019
    Status: Point in time view as at 11/10/2019. This version of this Act contains provisions that are not valid for this point in time. Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Management of Offenders (Scotland) Act 2019. (See end of Document for details) Management of Offenders (Scotland) Act 2019 2019 asp 14 The Bill for this Act of the Scottish Parliament was passed by the Parliament on 25th June 2019 and received Royal Assent on 30th July 2019 An Act of the Scottish Parliament to make provision for electronic monitoring of offenders and as to certain other restrictive measures imposable on offenders; to make provision about periods and processes as regards disclosure of convictions by offenders; and to make provision concerning particular aspects of the system governing parole of offenders. PART 1 ELECTRONIC MONITORING ETC. VALID FROM 01/10/2020 Monitoring in criminal proceedings PROSPECTIVE 1 Requirement when disposing of case (1) When making a person subject to a disposal listed in section 3(2), a court may additionally require the person to submit to monitoring by means of an approved device. (2) Section 8(1) describes what an approved device is in relation to a requirement under subsection (1). (3) A requirement under subsection (1) means that the person— (a) is to be monitored by a person designated under section 11(1)(a), and (b) is bound by the obligations set out in section 12(2) and (3). 2 Management of Offenders (Scotland) Act 2019 asp 14 PART 1 – Electronic monitoring etc.
    [Show full text]
  • An Opportunity Lost: the United Kingdom's Failed Reform of Defamation Law
    Federal Communications Law Journal Volume 49 Issue 3 Article 4 4-1997 An Opportunity Lost: The United Kingdom's Failed Reform of Defamation Law Douglas W. Vick University of Stirling Linda Macpherson Heriot-Watt University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the European Law Commons Recommended Citation Vick, Douglas W. and Macpherson, Linda (1997) "An Opportunity Lost: The United Kingdom's Failed Reform of Defamation Law," Federal Communications Law Journal: Vol. 49 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/fclj/vol49/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Federal Communications Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Opportunity Lost: The United Kingdom's Failed Reform of Defamation Law Douglas W. Vick* Linda Macpherson** INTRODUCTION ..................................... 621 I. BACKGROUND OF THE ACT ....................... 624 I. THE DEFAMATION ACT 1996 ...................... 629 A. The New Defenses ......................... 630 B. The ProceduralReforms ..................... 636 C. Waiving ParliamentaryPrivilege ............... 643 III. AN OPPORTUNITY LOST ......................... 646 CONCLUSION ....................................... 652 INTRODUCTION The law of defamation in the United Kingdom remains
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Intermediary Liability in Defamation: Proposals for Statutory Reform
    INTERNET INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY IN DEFAMATION: PROPOSALS FOR STATUTORY REFORM Defamation Law in the Internet Age July 2017 Commissioned by the Law Commission of Ontario Prepared by Emily Laidlaw, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Calgary Faculty of Law Hilary Young, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of New Brunswick, Faculty of Law The LCO commissioned this paper to provide background research for its Defamation Law in the Internet Age project. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the LCO. Internet Intermediary Liability in Defamation: Proposals for Statutory Reform Emily Laidlaw, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of Calgary Faculty of Law Hilary Young, Ph.D., Associate Professor, University of New Brunswick Faculty of Law Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ..………………………………………………………………………….. ……………………………………. 1 II. THE COMMON LAW OF PUBLICATION IN DEFAMATION ……….…………………………………….……….. 3 A. Introduction to Publication ……………………………………………………………………………….……… 3 B. Innocent Dissemination ………………………………………………………………………………………..…. 4 C. Publication by Omission……………………………………………………………………………………………..7 D. Conclusion on the common law of publication ………………..…………………………………..….. 9 III. THE LAW OF PUBLICATION AS APPLIED TO INTERNET INTERMEDIARIES ………..…..…………….. 10 A. Introduction ..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 B. The Common Law ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 1. United States ………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 11 2. United Kingdom …………………………………………………………………………………………..14 3. Australia
    [Show full text]