Published online 16 March 2015 Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, Vol. 43, No. 7 3747–3763 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv194 Identification of U2AF(35)-dependent exons by RNA-Seq reveals a link between 3 splice-site organization and activity of U2AF-related proteins Jana Kralovicova1,†, Marcin Knut1,†, Nicholas C. P. Cross1,2 and Igor Vorechovsky1,*
1University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK and 2Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury SP2 8BJ, UK Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/43/7/3747/2414418 by guest on 23 September 2021 Received July 2, 2014; Revised February 18, 2015; Accepted February 24, 2015
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The auxiliary factor of U2 small nuclear RNA (U2AF) Eukaryotic genes contain intervening sequences or introns is a heterodimer consisting of 65- and 35-kD proteins that are removed from mRNA precursors by a large and that bind the polypyrimidine tract (PPT) and AG dinu- highly dynamic RNA–protein complex, termed the spliceo- some (1). The spliceosome consists of small nuclear ribonu- cleotides at the 3 splice site (3 ss). The gene encod- / / ing U2AF35 (U2AF1) is alternatively spliced, giving cleoproteins (snRNPs), including the U1, U2, U4 U5 U6 of the major U2 spliceosome and the U11, U12, U4atac / rise to two isoforms U2AF35a and U2AF35b. Here, we U6atac/U5 of the less abundant U12 spliceosome, and a knocked down U2AF35 and each isoform and char- large number of non-snRNP proteins (1). Spliceosomes as- acterized transcriptomes of HEK293 cells with vary- semble on each intron in an ordered manner, starting with ing U2AF35/U2AF65 and U2AF35a/b ratios. Deple- recognition of the 5 splice site (5 ss) by U1 snRNP or the tion of both isoforms preferentially modified alter- 3 ss by the U2 pathway (2), which involves binding of the U2 native RNA processing events without widespread auxiliary factor (U2AF) to the 3 ss region to facilitate U2 failure to recognize 3ss or constitutive exons. Over snRNP recruitment to the branch point (BP) (3,4). U2AF is a third of differentially used exons were terminal, a stable heterodimer composed of a U2AF2-encoded 65-kD resulting largely from the use of known alternative subunit (U2AF65), which contacts the polypyrimidine tract polyadenylation (APA) sites. Intronic APA sites ac- (PPT), and a U2AF1-encoded 35-kD subunit (U2AF35). tivated in depleted cultures were mostly proximal U2AF35 interacts with almost invariant AG dinucleotides at 3 ss and stabilizes U2AF65 binding to RNA (5–8). whereas tandem 3UTR APA was biased toward distal The U2AF1 gene is alternatively spliced, giving rise to sites. Exons upregulated in depleted cells were pre- conserved mRNA isoforms termed U2AF1a, U2AF1b and ceded by longer AG exclusion zones and PPTs than U2AF1c (9). In mice, U2AF1a is more abundant than downregulated or control exons and were largely ac- U2AF1b and contains a highly conserved 67-bp exon 3 in tivated by PUF60 and repressed by CAPER␣. The the mRNA whereas U2AF1b incorporates exon Ab of the U2AF(35) repression and activation was associated same size (9). The U2AF1c isoform includes both exons with a significant interchange in the average prob- that introduce a premature termination codon (PTC) in the abilities to form single-stranded RNA in the opti- mRNA, which is targeted by RNA surveillance (9). Both mal PPT and branch site locations and sequences U2AF35a and U2AF35b contain a central U2AF65 recog- further upstream. Although most differentially used nition domain of the UHM (U2AF homology motif) type exons were responsive to both U2AF subunits and flanked by two C3H-type zinc finger (ZF) domains anda C-terminal arginine/serine-rich (RS) region (10–13). Both their inclusion correlated with U2AF levels, a small U2AF35a and U2AF35b interact with U2AF65 and could number of transcripts exhibited distinct responses stimulate its binding to a PPT (9). During evolution, the to U2AF35a and U2AF35b, supporting the existence two U2AF35 proteins have been under high selection pres- of isoform-specific interactions. These results pro- sure, suggesting that they may play specific functions in ver- vide new insights into function of U2AF and U2AF35 tebrates and plants (9,14,15), but their putative functional in alternative RNA processing. differences in 3 ss selection are not known.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 2380 796425; Fax: +44 2380 794264; Email: [email protected] †The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors.