Shoulder Instability. a Clinical and Mri-Based Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Is a Function Selection Patient Indication
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH Number 390, pp. 31–41 © 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Experience With an Absorbable, Transfixing Implant 03/25/2020 on BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3XGJiJSDa6kLdjliRzOOsR+bI3gZWJ99pv/KNUfPjA6Y= by https://journals.lww.com/clinorthop from Downloaded Stephen Fealy, MD; Mark C. Drakos, BA; Downloaded Answorth A. Allen, MD; and Russell F. Warren, MD from https://journals.lww.com/clinorthop by 3 BhDMf5ePHKav1zEoum1tQfN4a+kJLhEZgbsIHo4XMi0hCywCX1AWnYQp/IlQrHD3XGJiJSDa6kLdjliRzOOsR+bI3gZWJ99pv/KNUfPjA6Y= The use of arthroscopic means to address shoul- scribed in 1938. The essential lesion of shoul- der instability has provided a technically advan- der instability, as described by Bankart, is tageous way to approach Bankart lesions while thought by many to represent the most com- posing complex questions regarding the specific mon disorder underlying possible causes for indications for such an intervention. A successful shoulder instability.2,19,31 It represents a de- outcome with arthroscopic Bankart repair is a tachment of the labrum and its osseous inser- function of proper surgical indication and pa- tient selection. Several authors have evaluated tion from the anteroinferior glenoid. Reestab- the causes of failure and reasons for success with lishing the structural integrity of the soft tissue the Suretac device. The development of a bioab- to glenoid interface is the paramount objective sorbable repair device at the authors’ institution of the Bankart repair and has an essential role was precipitated by a desire to address and re- in surgery for shoulder stability. Although the pair Bankart lesions arthroscopically while traditional open Bankart repair remains the avoiding the frequent complications associated gold standard in treatment options, continued with the metal staple and the transglenoid suture development of arthroscopic techniques and technique. -
Coracoid Graft Union: a Quantitative Assessment by Computed Tomography in Primary and Revision Latarjet Procedure
ARTICLE IN PRESS J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2018) ■■, ■■–■■ www.elsevier.com/locate/ymse ORIGINAL ARTICLE Coracoid graft union: a quantitative assessment by computed tomography in primary and revision Latarjet procedure Mohammad Samim, MD, MRCSa, Kirstin M. Small,MDb,*, Laurence D. Higgins, MD, MBAc aDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA bDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA cBoston Shoulder Institute, Boston, MA, USA Background: The goal of the Latarjet procedure is restoration of shoulder stability enabled by accurate graft positioning and union. This study aimed to establish a reproducible method of quantitatively assess- ing coracoid graft osseous union percentage (OUP) using computed tomography (CT) scans and to determine the effect of other factors on the OUP. Materials and methods: Postoperative CT scans of 41 consecutive patients treated with the open Latarjet procedure (37% primary, 63% revision) for anterior glenohumeral instability were analyzed for the OUP, position of the graft, and screw type and angle. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently exam- ined the images 2 times, and intraobserver and interobserver reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Mean OUP was 66% (range, 0%-94%) using quantitate methods, with good intraobserver re- liability (ICC = 0.795) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.797). Nonunion and significant graft resorption was found in 2 patients. No significant difference was found in the mean OUP in the primary (63%) vs. revision Latarjet procedure (67%). Grafts were flush in 39%, medial in 36%, and lateral in 8%. The medial and neutral graft position was associated with slightly higher OUP (72% and 69%) compared with lateral (65%). -
Management of the First-Time Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation
CONCISE REVIEW CiSE Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow Vol. 21, No. 3, September, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.3.169 Management of the First-time Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Dislocation Sung Il Wang Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Insitute for Endocrine Sciences and Research Insitute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University–Biomedical Research Insitute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea Traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder is one of the most common directions of instability following a traumatic event. Although the incidence of shoulder dislocation is similar between young and elderly patients, most studies have traditionally focused on young pa- tients due to relatively high rates of recurrent dislocations in this population. However, shoulder dislocations in older patients also require careful evaluation and treatment selection because they can lead to persistent pain and disability due to rotator cuff tears and nerve injuries. This article provides an overview of the nature and pathology of acute primary anterior shoulder dislocation, widely accepted management modalities, and differences in treatment for young and elderly patients. (Clin Shoulder Elbow 2018;21(3):169-175) Key Words: Glenohumeral joint; Shoulder dislocation; Treatment Introduction the shoulder will invariably be damaged, rendering the joint un- stable. The glenohumeral joint has the greatest range of motion There are controversies over the best treatment for patients among all joints in the human body. To achieve increased with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation. Assessment of risk mobility, joint stability is sacrificed, making shoulder joint sus- factors for recurrence is essential when deciding on the treat- ceptible to dislocation. -
Clinical Guidelines
CLINICAL GUIDELINES Joint Services Guidelines Version 1.0.2019 Clinical guidelines for medical necessity review of comprehensive musculoskeletal management services. © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. Regence: Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 Large Joint Services CMM-311: Knee Replacement/Arthroplasty 3 CMM-312: Knee Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures 14 CMM-313: Hip Replacement/Arthroplasty 35 CMM-314: Hip Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures 46 CMM-315: Shoulder Surgery-Arthroscopic and Open Procedures 47 CMM-318: Shoulder Arthroplasty/ Replacement/ Resurfacing/ Revision/ Arthrodesis 62 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Page 2 of 69 400 Buckwalter Place Boulevard, Bluffton, SC 29910 (800) 918-8924 www.eviCore.com Regence: Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 CMM-311: Knee Replacement/Arthroplasty CMM-311.1: Definition 4 CMM-311.2: General Guidelines 5 CMM-311.3: Indications and Non-Indications 5 CMM-311.4 Experimental, Investigational, or Unproven 9 CMM-311.5: Procedure (CPT®) Codes 10 CMM-311.6: References 10 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Page 3 of 69 400 Buckwalter Place Boulevard, Bluffton, SC 29910 (800) 918-8924 www.eviCore.com Regence: Comprehensive Musculoskeletal Management Guidelines V1.0.2019 CMM-311.1: Definition -
Epidemiology of Paediatric Shoulder Dislocation: a Nationwide Study in Italy from 2001 to 2014
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Epidemiology of Paediatric Shoulder Dislocation: A Nationwide Study in Italy from 2001 to 2014 Umile Giuseppe Longo 1,* , Giuseppe Salvatore 1, Joel Locher 1, Laura Ruzzini 2, Vincenzo Candela 1, Alessandra Berton 1, Giovanna Stelitano 1, Emiliano Schena 3 and Vincenzo Denaro 1 1 Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (G.S.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (V.C.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (G.S.); [email protected] (V.D.) 2 Department of Orthopedics, Children’s Hospital Bambino Gesù, Via Torre di Palidoro, Palidoro, 00165 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 3 Unit of Measurements and Biomedical Instrumentation, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Rome, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-06-225411613; Fax: +39-06-225411638 Received: 10 March 2020; Accepted: 17 April 2020; Published: 20 April 2020 Abstract: Limited knowledge is accessible concerning the tendencies of hospitalization for skeletally immature patients with episodes of shoulder dislocation. Our research aim was to evaluate annual hospitalizations for shoulder dislocation in paediatric patients in Italy from 2001 to 2014, on the basis of the official data source as hospitalization reports. The second purpose was to investigate geographical diversification in hospitalization for shoulder dislocation in regions of Italy. The last aim was to make statistical predictions of the number of shoulder dislocation hospitalization volumes and rates in skeletally immature patients based on data from 2001 to 2014. -
The Only Online Procedures Training and Reference Solution
Procedures Consult Enhances Patient Safety and Reduces Medical Errors from Elsevier, world’s leading provider of medical information resources. Complete list of procedures Internal Medicine Module Lumbar Epidural Injections Arthrocentesis: Elbow* Abdominal Paracentesis Lumbar Laminectomy Arthrocentesis: Knee* Arterial Blood Gas Sampling Mini incision – total hip Arthrocentesis: MCP* Arterial Cannulation Mini incision – total knee Arthrocentesis: MTP* Arthrocentesis: Ankle Minimally Invasive Plating of Pilon Fractures Arthrocentesis: Shoulder* Arthrocentesis: Elbow Open repair chronic rotator cuff tear Arthrocentesis: Wrist* Arthrocentesis: Knee ORIF distal fibular fracture (lateral malleolus) Balloon Tamponade of Gastroesophageal Varcies Arthrocentesis: MCP ORIF distal radial fracture (Colles or Smith fx) Basic Airway Management* Arthrocentesis: MTP ORIF femoral fracture Basics of Wound Management Arthrocentesis: Shoulder Osteochondral Allograft Cardioversion* Arthrocentesis: Wrist Osteochondral Autograft Coaptation Splint* Basic Airway Management Osteochondral Cartilage Repair Compartment Syndrome Evaluation Cardioversion Osteotomies for Hallux Valgus Correction Cricothyrotomy Percutaneous Fixation of Proximal Slipped Capital Central Venous Catheterization: Femoral Approach Defibrillation* Femoral Epiphysis Central Venous Catheterization: Internal Dental Nerve Blocks Plateing of humeral shaft fractures Jugular Approach Digital Nerve Block Posterior spinal instrumentation – scoliosis Central Venous Catheterization: Subclavian Approach -
History of Surgical Intervention of Anterior Shoulder Instability
J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2016) 25, e139–e150 www.elsevier.com/locate/ymse History of surgical intervention of anterior shoulder instability David M. Levy,MD*, Brian J. Cole, MD, MBA, Bernard R. Bach Jr, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Background: Anterior glenohumeral instability most commonly affects younger patients and has shown high recurrence rates with nonoperative management. The treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability has undergone significant evolution over the 20th and 21 centuries. Methods: This article presents a retrospective comprehensive review of the history of different operative techniques for shoulder stabilization. Results: Bankart first described an anatomic suture repair of the inferior glenohumeral ligament and anteroinferior labrum in 1923. Multiple surgeons have since described anatomic and nonanatomic repairs, and many of the early principles of shoulder stabilization have remained even as the techniques have changed. Some methods, such as the Magnusson-Stack procedure, Putti-Platt procedure, arthroscopic stapling, and transosseous suture fixation, have been almost completely abandoned. Other strategies, such as the Bankart repair, capsular shift, and remplissage, have persisted for decades and have been adapted for arthroscopic use. Discussion: The future of anterior shoulder stabilization will continue to evolve with even newer prac- tices, such as the arthroscopic Latarjet transfer. Further research and clinical experience will dictate which future innovations are ultimately embraced. Level of evidence: Review Article © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Keywords: Anterior glenohumeral instability; dislocation; subluxation; shoulder stabilization; arthroscopic; Bankart Because of its relative lack of bony limitations and ex- Hovelius et al60 in a prospective study of 229 primary dis- tensive range of motion, the shoulder is the most commonly locations treated nonoperatively. -
The Spectrum of Lesions and Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Stabilization of Acute Anterior Shoulder Instability
DOI 10.3349/ymj.2010.51.3.421 Original Article pISSN: 0513-5796, eISSN: 1976-2437 Yonsei Med J 51(3): 421-426, 2010 The Spectrum of Lesions and Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Stabilization of Acute Anterior Shoulder Instability Doo Sup Kim, Yeo Seung Yoon, and Sung Min Kwon Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea. Received: June 11, 2009 Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate and analyze accom-panying Revised: August 1, 2009 lesions including injury types of anteroinferior labrum lesion in young and active Accepted: August 6, 2009 patients who suffered traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation for the first time. Corresponding author: Dr. Doo Sup Kim, Meterials and Methods: The study used magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, to 40 patients with acute anterior shoulder dislocation from April 2004 to April Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University, 2008, and of those, 36 with abnormal MRA finding were treated with arthroscopy. 162 Ilsan-dong, Wonju 220-701, Korea. Results: There was a total of 25 cases of anteroinferior glenoid labrum lesions. A Tel: 82-33-741-1357, Fax: 82-33-746-7326 superior labrum anterior-posterior lesion (SLAP) lesion was observed in 8 cases. E-mail: [email protected] For bony lesions, 22 cases of Hill-sachs lesions, 4 cases of lesions in greater ∙The authors have no financial conflicts of tuberosity fracture of humerus, and 4 cases of loose body were found. For lesions interest. involving rotator cuff, partial articular side rupture was found in 2 cases and 2 cases were found to have a complete rupture. -
Imaging of the Shoulder Bankart Lesion and Its Variants
REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.3126/njr.v9i1.24816 Imaging of the Shoulder Bankart Lesion and its Variants Leow KS1, Low SF2, PehWCG1 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Yishun Central, Singapore, Republic of Singapore 2Department of Radiology, Kuala Lumpur Sports Medicine Centre, Jalan Dungun, Bukit Damansara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Received: March 08, 2019 Accepted: April 15, 2019 Published: June 30, 2019 Cite this paper: Leow KS, Low SF, PehWCG. Imaging of the Shoulder Bankart Lesion and its Variants. Nepalese Journal of Radiology 2019;9(13):33-39. https://doi.org/10.3126/njr.v9i1.24816 ABSTRACT The glenoid labrum is an important soft tissue structure that provides stability to the shoulder joint. When the labrum is injured, affected patients may present with chronic shoulder instability and future recurrent dislocation. The Bankart lesion is the most common labral injury, and is often accompanied by a Hill-Sachs lesion of the humerus. Various imaging techniques are available for detection of the Bankart lesion and its variants, such as anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion and Perthes lesion. Direct magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography is currently the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of the various types of labral tears. As normal anatomical variants of glenoid labrum are not uncommonly encountered, familiarity with appearances of this potential pitfall helps avoid misdiagnosis. Key words: Anterior Labroligamentous Periosteal Sleeve Avulsion, Glenohumeral Joint Dislocation, Hill-Sachs Lesion, MR Arthrography, Perthes Lesion, Shoulder Dislocation INTRODUCTION The shoulder joint is one of the more commonly injured joints in the body, with its inherently large range of mobility predisposing it to risk of dislocation and development of chronic instability. -
Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Classification of Pathologies of Anteroinferior Labroligamentous Structures Using MR Arthrography
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Orthopedics Volume 2013, Article ID 473194, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/473194 Clinical Study Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: Classification of Pathologies of Anteroinferior Labroligamentous Structures Using MR Arthrography Serhat Mutlu,1 Mahir MahJroLullari,2 Olcay Güler,3 Bekir Yavuz Uçar,4 Harun Mutlu,5 Güner Sönmez,6 and Hakan Mutlu6 1 Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Education and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey 2 Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey 3 Nisa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey 4 Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkey 5 Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey 6 Gulhane¨ Military Medical Academy Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey Correspondence should be addressed to Serhat Mutlu; [email protected] Received 24 June 2013; Accepted 13 September 2013 Academic Editor: Panagiotis Korovessis Copyright © 2013 Serhat Mutlu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We examined labroligamentous structures in unstable anteroinferior glenohumeral joints using MR arthrography (MRA) to demonstrate that not all instabilities are Bankart lesions. We aimed to show that other surgical protocols besides classic Bankart repair are appropriate for labroligamentous lesions. The study included 35 patients (33 males and 2 females; mean age: 30.2; range: 18 to 57 years). MRA was performed in all patients. The lesions underlying patients’ instability such as Bankart, anterior labral periosteal sleeve avulsion (ALPSA), and Perthes lesions were diagnosed by two radiologists. MRA yielded 16 diagnoses of Bankart lesions, 5 of ALPSA lesions, and 14 of Perthes lesions. -
FNB MOCK TEST 3 Answers & Explanations
FNB MOCK TEST 3 Answers & Explanations Q. 1 What is true about arthritic hip joint? A. The abductor lever arm is lengthened B. the ratio of the lever arm of the body weight to that of the abductors is increased C. The body weight lever arm is lengthened D. The abductor lever arm remains unchanged The abductor lever arm is shortened in arthritis and other hip disorders in which part or all of the head is lost or the neck is shortened. In an arthritic hip, although the length of the body weight lever arm does not change the ratio of the lever arm of the body weight to that of the abductors may be 4 : 1. The lengths of the two lever arms can be surgically changed to make their ratio approach 1 : 1. Theoretically, this reduces the total load on the hip by 30%. Answer: B Q. 2 After total hip arthroplasty which factor will cause more stress shielding in the proximal femur around the stem? A. Stem of low modulus of elasticity B. Titanium stem compared to Cobalt-Chromium (COCR) stem C. Cylindrical distal fitting stem compared to tapered stem D. Small diameter stem Stress transfer to the femur is desirable because it provides a physiologic stimulus for maintaining bone mass and preventing disuse osteoporosis. Factors affecting stress shielding are: -Modulus of elasticity: A decrease in the modulus of elasticity of a stem decreases the stress in the stem and increases stresses to the surrounding bone. This is true of stems made of metals with a lower modulus of elasticity, such as a titanium alloy, if the cross sectional diameter is relatively small. -
The Open Modified Bankart Procedure 1065
Upper limb The open modified Bankart procedure OUTCOME AT FOLLOW-UP OF 10 TO 15 YEARS T. D. Berendes, We report the outcome of a modified Bankart procedure using suture anchors in 31 patients R. Wolterbeek, (31 shoulders) with a mean follow-up of 11 years (10 to 15). The mean age of the patients P. Pilot, was 28 years (16 to 39). At follow-up, the mean Rowe score was 90 points (66 to 98) and the H. Verburg, Constant score was 96 points (85 to 100). A total of 26 shoulders (84%) had a good or R. L. te Slaa excellent result. The rate of recurrence varied between 6.7% and 9.7% and depended on how recurrence was defined. Two patients had a significant new injury at one and nine From The Reinier de years, respectively after operation. The overall rate of instability (including subluxations) Graaf Groep, Delft, varied between 12.9% and 22.6%. All patients returned to work, with 29 (94%) resuming The Netherlands their pre-operative occupation and level of activity. Mild radiological osteoarthritis was seen in nine shoulders (29%) and severe osteoarthritis in one. We conclude that the open modified Bankart procedure is a reliable surgical technique with good long-term results. The common form of instability of the shoulder lisation of the shoulder between November is traumatic anterior dislocation,1 and operative 1989 and December 1993 were reviewed at a treatment is classified as anatomical or non-ana- mean follow-up of 11 years (10 to 15). None tomical. The former was first described by had multi-directional instability or previous Bankart2 in 1938 and involves reconstruction of operative procedures on the shoulder.