DOCSLIB.ORG

Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients Jay A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients Jay A T h e new england journal o f medicine Review article Medical Progress Infection in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients Jay A. Fishman, M.D. ncreasingly potent immunosuppressive agents have dramatically From the Transplant Infectious Disease reduced the incidence of rejection of transplanted organs while increasing pa- and Compromised Host Program, Massa- 1,2 chusetts General Hospital, and Harvard tients’ susceptibility to opportunistic infections and cancer. At the same time, Medical School, Boston. Address reprint I requests to Dr. Fishman at the Transplant patterns of opportunistic infections after transplantation have been altered by routine antimicrobial prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii (also called P. jirovecii) and cytomega- Infectious Disease and Compromised Host Program, Massachusetts General lovirus. These patterns have also been altered by the emergence of new clinical syn- Hospital, 55 Fruit St., GRJ 504, Boston, dromes (e.g., polyomavirus type BK nephropathy) and by infections due to organisms MA 02114, or at [email protected]. with antimicrobial resistance. New quantitative molecular and antigen-based micro- N Engl J Med 2007;357:2601-14. biologic assays detect previously unrecognized transplantation-associated pathogens Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. such as lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. These assays are used in the manage- ment of common infections such as those due to cytomegalovirus and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). In this article, I review general concepts in the management of trans- plantation-associated infections and discuss recent advances and challenges. GENERAL CONCEPTS It is more difficult to recognize infection in transplant recipients than it is in persons with normal immune function, since signs and symptoms of infection are often di- minished. In addition, noninfectious causes of fever, such as allograft rejection, may develop in transplant recipients. Antimicrobial therapy frequently has toxic effects that may involve interactions with immunosuppressive agents. The spectrum of po- tential pathogens is broad, and infection often progresses rapidly. Early and specific microbiologic diagnosis is essential for guiding treatment and minimizing nones- sential drug therapy. Invasive diagnostic procedures are often required for accurate and timely diagnosis. RISK OF INFECTION The risk of infection after transplantation changes over time, particularly with mod- ifications in immunosuppression. Unfortunately, no assays accurately measure a pa- tient’s risk of infection. Currently, therefore, the clinician assesses a recipient’s risk of infection while considering the risk of allograft rejection, the intensity of immuno- suppression, and other factors that may contribute to his or her susceptibility to in- fection. Prophylactic strategies are based on the patient’s known or likely exposures to infection according to the results of serologic testing and epidemiologic history. The risk of infection in the transplant recipient is a continuous function of the in- terplay between these factors. Epidemiologic Exposures Epidemiologic exposures can be divided into four overlapping categories: donor-derived infections, recipient-derived infections, nosocomial infections, and community infec- tions. n engl j med 357;25 www.nejm.org december 20, 2007 2601 T h e new england journal o f medicine Donor-Derived Infections and Screening Transplanted organs facilitate the transmission of A infections from organ donors. Mandatory report- ing of transplantation-associated infections has increased awareness of this problem. Most often, these infections (e.g., cytomegalovirus infection, tuberculosis, and Trypanosoma cruzi infection) are latent in transplanted tissues. Transmission may also be due to active donor infection such as vire- mia or bacteremia that was undiscovered at the time of organ procurement (Fig. 1A).3 Organ donors also may become infected with nosocomial organisms that are resistant to rou- tine surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, and they may transmit these organisms (e.g., vancomycin- B resistant enterococcus and azole-resistant candida species) to recipients.4-6 Clusters of infections derived from deceased donors have been described, including transplan- tation-associated West Nile virus infection, lym- phocytic choriomeningitis virus infection, rabies, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, and Chagas’ disease.3,7-10 In recent outbreaks of West Nile virus infection, lymphocytic choriomen- ingitis virus infection, and rabies, signs of infec- tious encephalitis in organs from deceased donors were masked by unrelated acute neurologic events and thus were not recognized. Figure 1. Effect of Donor-Derived Infection or Graft Nonspecific signs such as altered mental status Injury on the Risk of Infection after Transplantation. or abnormal results of liver-function tests may be Panel A is a chest radiograph showing pneumonia result- ing ICMfrom donor-derivedAUTHOR Fishman herpes simplex virusRET infection.AKE 1st the sole basis on which to investigate potential 2nd FeverREG and F pneumoniaFIGURE 1a&b developed of 5 in a kidney-transplant donor-related infections. In the normal host, in- CASE 3rd recipient 3 TITLEdays after a technically successful Revisedtransplanta- fections due to West Nile virus or lymphocytic tion,EMail and the patient had abnormalLine results4-C on liver-func- Enon SIZE choriomeningitis virus are generally self-limited. tion tests. BloodARTIST :andmst sputumH/T containedH/T herpes simplex FILL Combo 16p6 However, in organ-transplant recipients with these virus. This virus was also detected in donor serum by means of a polymerase-chain-reactionAUTHOR, PLEASE NOTE: assay. Recipients infections, rapid progression, permanent neuro- Figure has been redrawn and type has been reset. logic damage, and death are more common be- of the liver, heart, andPlease other check kidney carefully from. the same donor were symptomatic and were treated successfully with an- cause of the broad immunologic deficits that are tiviralJOB: therapy. 35725 Panel B is a computedISSUE: tomographic12-20-07 scan present after transplantation. showing a liver abscess at the site of an ischemic graft in- The screening of transplant donors for infec- jury. The patient had persistently and mildly abnormal tion is limited by the available technology and by liver-function tests (elevated alkaline phosphatase and to- the short period during which organs from de- tal bilirubin levels) after undergoing technically success- ful orthotopic liver transplantation with early graft isch- ceased donors can be used. At present, the routine emia. Three years later, fever and chills developed, and evaluation of donors for infectious disease gener- a heterogeneous 6-cm abscess (arrow) with intrahepatic ally relies on antibody detection with the use of biliary ductal dilatation was detected. Therapy included serologic tests for common infections (Fig. 2). percutaneous drainage and administration of antimicro- Since seroconversion may not occur during acute bial agents for organisms including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Candida glabrata. infections and the sensitivity of these tests is not 100%, some active infections remain undetected. Some organs that contain unidentified pathogens curement organizations. Augmented screening is will inevitably be implanted. Improved donor recommended on a regional basis for endemic or screening will require the use of more sensitive epidemic infections such as West Nile virus infec- (e.g., molecular) and rapid assays by organ-pro- tion, Chagas’ disease, and strongyloidiasis.11 2602 n engl j med 357;25 www.nejm.org december 20, 2007 Medical Progress Some documented infections, such as sepsis and HIV infection, preclude organ donation. Or- Donor Screening gans from donors with specified known infec- Epidemiologic history Serologic testing for VDRL, HIV, tions may be considered for specific recipients — CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV, HBV provided there is appropriate informed consent (HBsAg, anti-HBsAg), and HCV Microbiologic testing of blood — based on the urgency of the need for transplan- and urine Risk Assessment tation and the availability of effective antimicro- Chest radiography Higher risk of infection Known infections (appropriate Induction therapy with lympho- bial therapies. For example, some livers from do- therapy?) cyte depletion nors who were seropositive for Chagas’ disease Possible infections (e.g., encepha- Pulsed-dose corticosteroids litis, sepsis) Plasmapheresis have been used successfully with benznidazole Special serologic testing, nucleic High risk of rejection prophylaxis in regions where the disease is en- acid assays, or antigen detection Early graft rejection 12 based on epidemiologic factors Graft dysfunction demic. Similarly, although organs from donors and recent exposures (e.g., toxo- Active or latent infection in the infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and who plasma, West Nile virus, HIV, donor or recipient HCV) Technical complications had test results that were positive for antibodies Anastomotic leak against hepatitis B core antigen and negative for Bleeding antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen were Wound infection or poor Recipient Screening healing Prolonged intubation rejected in the past, they are currently used for Epidemiologic history Prolonged use of surgical, Vaccination history some recipients who have been vaccinated or who vascular, or urinary Serologic testing for VDRL, HIV, catheters were previously
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Organ Transplant Discrimination Against People with Disabilities Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series
    Organ Transplant Discrimination Against People with Disabilities Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series National Council on Disability September 25, 2019 National Council on Disability (NCD) 1331 F Street NW, Suite 850 Washington, DC 20004 Organ Transplant Discrimination Against People with Disabilities: Part of the Bioethics and Disability Series National Council on Disability, September 25, 2019 This report is also available in alternative formats. Please visit the National Council on Disability (NCD) website (www.ncd.gov) or contact NCD to request an alternative format using the following information: [email protected] Email 202-272-2004 Voice 202-272-2022 Fax The views contained in this report do not necessarily represent those of the Administration, as this and all NCD documents are not subject to the A-19 Executive Branch review process. National Council on Disability An independent federal agency making recommendations to the President and Congress to enhance the quality of life for all Americans with disabilities and their families. Letter of Transmittal September 25, 2019 The President The White House Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, On behalf of the National Council on Disability (NCD), I am pleased to submit Organ Transplants and Discrimination Against People with Disabilities, part of a five-report series on the intersection of disability and bioethics. This report, and the others in the series, focuses on how the historical and continued devaluation of the lives of people with disabilities by the medical community, legislators, researchers, and even health economists, perpetuates unequal access to medical care, including life- saving care. Organ transplants save lives. But for far too long, people with disabilities have been denied organ transplants as a result of unfounded assumptions about their quality of life and misconceptions about their ability to comply with post-operative care.
    [Show full text]
  • BK Virus: Current Understanding of Pathogenicity and Clinical Disease in Transplantation
    This is a repository copy of BK virus: Current understanding of pathogenicity and clinical disease in transplantation. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/146942/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Chong, S, Antoni, M orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-7559, Macdonald, A orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-4693 et al. (3 more authors) (2019) BK virus: Current understanding of pathogenicity and clinical disease in transplantation. Reviews in Medical Virology, 29 (4). ARTN: e2044. ISSN 1052-9276 https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2044 © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Reviews in Medical Virology. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ BK virus: Current understanding of pathogenicity and clinical disease in transplantation Running head: BK Virus: current understanding in Transplantation Stephanie Chong1, Michelle Antoni2, Andrew Macdonald2, Matthew Reeves3, Mark Harber1 and Ciara N.
    [Show full text]
  • Merkel Cell Polyomavirus DNA in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Patients with Respiratory Disease
    Journal of Medical Virology 83:2220–2224 (2011) Merkel Cell Polyomavirus DNA in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Patients With Respiratory Disease Bahman Abedi Kiasari,1,3* Pamela J. Vallely,1 and Paul E. Klapper1,2 1Department of Virology, Genomic Epidemiology Research Group, School of Translational Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom 2Clinical Virology, Manchester Medical Microbiology Partnership, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom 3Human Viral Vaccine Department, Razi Vaccine & Serum Research Institute, Hesarak, Karaj, Iran Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) was identi- INTRODUCTION fied originally in association with a rare but aggressive skin cancer, Merkel cell carcinoma. In the past few years, a number of new human poly- The virus has since been found in the respirato- omaviruses, KI, WU, human polyomavirus 6 (HPyV6), ry tract of some patients with respiratory human polyomavirus 7 (HPyV7), trichodysplasia spi- disease. However, the role of MCPyV in the nulosa virus (TSV), human polyomavirus 9 (HPyV9), causation of respiratory disease has not been and Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) have been established. To determine the prevalence of discovered [Allander et al., 2007; Gaynor et al., 2007; MCPyV in 305 respiratory samples from Feng et al., 2008; Schowalter et al., 2010; van der immunocompetent and immunocompromised Meijden et al., 2010; Scuda et al., 2011]. MCPyV was patients and evaluate their contribution to re- discovered by digital transcriptome subtraction from a spiratory diseases, specimens were screened human skin cancer, Merkel cell carcinoma [Feng for MCPyV using single, multiplex, or real-time et al., 2008]. The finding of MCPyV in human Merkel PCR; co-infection with other viruses was exam- cell carcinoma suggests a role for this virus in the ined.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Organ Transplantation, 21 Hastings L.J
    Hastings Law Journal Volume 21 | Issue 1 Article 4 1-1969 The tS ory of Organ Transplantation J. Englebert Dunphy Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation J. Englebert Dunphy, The Story of Organ Transplantation, 21 Hastings L.J. 67 (1969). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol21/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. The Story of Organ Transplantation By J. ENGLEBERT DUNmHY, M.D.* THE successful transplantation of a heart from one human being to another, by Dr. Christian Barnard of South Africa, hias occasioned an intense renewal of public interest in organ transplantation. The back- ground of transplantation, and its present status, with a note on certain ethical aspects are reviewed here with the interest of the lay reader in mind. History of Transplants Transplantation of tissues was performed over 5000 years ago. Both the Egyptians and Hindus transplanted skin to replace noses destroyed by syphilis. Between 53 B.C. and 210 A.D., both Celsus and Galen carried out successful transplantation of tissues from one part of the body to another. While reports of transplantation of tissues from one person to another were also recorded, accurate documentation of success was not established. John Hunter, the father of scientific surgery, practiced transplan- tation experimentally and clinically in the 1760's. Hunter, assisted by a dentist, transplanted teeth for distinguished ladies, usually taking them from their unfortunate maidservants.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview on Human Polyomaviruses Developing Cancer
    The Journal of Medical Research 2020; 6(4): 125-127 Review Article An overview on human polyomaviruses developing cancer in JMR 2020; 6(4): 125-127 humans July- August ISSN: 2395-7565 Mohammad Salim1, Mohammad Shahid Masroor2, Shagufta parween3, I.P. Prajapati1 © 2020, All rights reserved 1 Sanjay Gandhi Smriti Govt. Autonomous P.G. College, Sidhi, (affiliated to APS University, Rewa), Madhya Pradesh- www.medicinearticle.com 486661, India Received: 22-06-2020 2 People’s College of Dental Sciences & Research Center, People's University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh- 462037, Accepted: 14-07-2020 India 3 All India Institute of Medical sciences (AIIMS), Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh-462020, India Abstract The family Polyomaviridae included about a dozen of human polyomaviruses (HPyVs), of which MCPyV, SV-40, JCV and BKV viruses have been reported to cause cancer in human. Merkel cell carcinoma is a very aggressive type of skin cancer caused by the MCPyV5. Similarly, while SV-40 and JCV viruses developed brain tumor cancer, the BK virus has been linked to renal transplantations and nephropathy producing urinary bladder tumor and prostate cancer in human. In this paper we have tried to summarize the recent information gained in the field of human polyomaviruses causing cancer in human. Keywords: Human polyomaviruses, Cancer, Virus. INTRODUCTION Viruses are among the few causes of cancer contributing to a variety of malignancies. In 1966, when Peyton Rous was awarded a Nobel prize in physiology and medicine for his discovery of Rous chicken sarcoma virus as a cause of cancer, a renewed interest came in the field of microbial origin of cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Viruses in Transplantation - Not Always Enemies
    Viruses in transplantation - not always enemies Virome and transplantation ECCMID 2018 - Madrid Prof. Laurent Kaiser Head Division of Infectious Diseases Laboratory of Virology Geneva Center for Emerging Viral Diseases University Hospital of Geneva ESCMID eLibrary © by author Conflict of interest None ESCMID eLibrary © by author The human virome: definition? Repertoire of viruses found on the surface of/inside any body fluid/tissue • Eukaryotic DNA and RNA viruses • Prokaryotic DNA and RNA viruses (phages) 25 • The “main” viral community (up to 10 bacteriophages in humans) Haynes M. 2011, Metagenomic of the human body • Endogenous viral elements integrated into host chromosomes (8% of the human genome) • NGS is shaping the definition Rascovan N et al. Annu Rev Microbiol 2016;70:125-41 Popgeorgiev N et al. Intervirology 2013;56:395-412 Norman JM et al. Cell 2015;160:447-60 ESCMID eLibraryFoxman EF et al. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011;9:254-64 © by author Viruses routinely known to cause diseases (non exhaustive) Upper resp./oropharyngeal HSV 1 Influenza CNS Mumps virus Rhinovirus JC virus RSV Eye Herpes viruses Parainfluenza HSV Measles Coronavirus Adenovirus LCM virus Cytomegalovirus Flaviviruses Rabies HHV6 Poliovirus Heart Lower respiratory HTLV-1 Coxsackie B virus Rhinoviruses Parainfluenza virus HIV Coronaviruses Respiratory syncytial virus Parainfluenza virus Adenovirus Respiratory syncytial virus Coronaviruses Gastro-intestinal Influenza virus type A and B Human Bocavirus 1 Adenovirus Hepatitis virus type A, B, C, D, E Those that cause
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of New Therapies for Human Herpesvirus 6
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect The development of new therapies for human herpesvirus 6 2 1 Mark N Prichard and Richard J Whitley Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infections are typically mild and data from viruses are generally analyzed together and in rare cases can result in encephalitis. A common theme reported simply as HHV-6 infections. Here, we will among all the herpesviruses, however, is the reactivation upon specify the specific virus where possible and will simply immune suppression. HHV-6 commonly reactivates in use the HHV-6 designation where it is not. Primary transplant recipients. No therapies are approved currently for infection with HHV-6B has been shown to be the cause the treatment of these infections, although small studies and of exanthem subitum (roseola) in infants [4], and can also individual case reports have reported intermittent success with result in an infectious mononucleosis-like illness in adults drugs such as cidofovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet. In addition [5]. Infections caused by HHV-6A and HHV-7 have not to the current experimental therapies, many other compounds been well characterized and are typically reported in the have been reported to inhibit HHV-6 in cell culture with varying transplant setting [6,7]. Serologic studies indicated that degrees of efficacy. Recent advances in the development of most people become infected with HHV-6 by the age of new small molecule inhibitors of HHV-6 will be reviewed with two, most likely through saliva transmission [8]. The regard to their efficacy and spectrum of antiviral activity. The receptors for HHV-6A and HHV-6B have been identified potential for new therapies for HHV-6 infections will also be as CD46 and CD134, respectively [9,10].
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms for Organ Donation and Transplantation
    Glossary of Terms for Organ Donation and Transplantation Technical Terms for Donation and Transplantation Appropriate Term Inappropriate Term “recover” organs “harvest” organs “recovery” of organs “harvesting” of organs “donation” of organs “harvesting” of organs “mechanical” or “ventilator” support “life” support “donated organs and tissues” “body parts” “deceased” donor “cadaveric” donor “deceased” donation “cadaveric” donation “registered as a donor” “signed a donor card” (antiquated) Blood Type One of four groups (A, B, AB or O) into which blood is classified. Blood types are based on differences in molecules (proteins and carbohydrates) on the surface of red blood cells. Candidate A person registered on the organ transplant waiting list. Criteria (Medical Criteria) A set of clinical or biologic standards or conditions that must be met. Deceased Donor A patient who has been declared dead using either the brain death or cardiac death criteria and from whom at least one solid organ or some amount of tissue is recovered for the purpose of organ transplantation. Donor A deceased donor from whom at least one organ or some amount of tissue is recovered for the purpose of transplantation. A living donor is one who donates an organ or segment of an organ (such as a kidney or portion of their liver) for the intent of transplantation. Living Donation Situation in which a living person gives an organ or a portion of an organ for use in a transplant. A kidney, portion of a liver, lung or intestine may be donated. Living Donor A living person who donates an organ for transplantation, such as a kidney or a segment of the lung, liver or intestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Significance of BK Polyomavirus in Long-Term Survivors After Adult
    biology Article Significance of BK Polyomavirus in Long-Term Survivors after Adult Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Thomas Neumann 1 , Nandette Peters 1, Jennifer Kranz 2,3, Desiree L. Dräger 4, Florian H. Heidel 1 , William Krüger 1,* and Laila Schneidewind 4,* 1 Department of Hematology/Oncology, University Medical Center Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany; [email protected] (T.N.); [email protected] (N.P.); [email protected] (F.H.H.) 2 Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin-Luther-University, 06120 Halle/Saale, Germany; [email protected] 3 Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital gGmbH, 52249 Eschweiler, Germany 4 Department of Urology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18055 Rostock, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (W.K.); [email protected] (L.S.); Tel.: +49-3834-86-22007 (W.K.); +49-381-494-7850 (L.S.) Simple Summary: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment option for several hematological diseases. Data about health status and late complications of long-term survivors of this therapy are limited, so we conducted a prospective study. This analysis focusses on kidney function and urological complications. Interestingly, the BK polyomavirus plays an important role in this patient population and can lead to severe impairment of kidney function. This was only previously described in the acute situation following transplantation. Further studies should address causal Citation: Neumann, T.; Peters, N.; therapy development for this severe viral infection. Kranz, J.; Dräger, D.L.; Heidel, F.H.; Krüger, W.; Schneidewind, L.
    [Show full text]
  • BK Virus Qualitative/Quantitative Real-Time PCR
    BK Virus Qualitative/Quantitative Real-Time PCR BK Virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus which causes a mild to Testing Schedule: asymptomatic respiratory infection and establishes latency Testing for BK Virus is performed Mon-Fri on first shift, in renal cells and lymphocytes. Upon immunosuppression, and once on weekends (first shift). For testing outside of reactivation can cause a variety of conditions, including this schedule, call the lab at 513-636-9820. TAT: 1-3 days hematuria, hemorrhagic cystitis, ureteric stenosis, interstitial nephritis, pneumonitis, encephalitis, retinitis, CPT Codes: and various tumors. Renal transplant patients are the Qualitative: 87798 highest at-risk group for BKV reactivation with renal Quantitative: 87799 dysfunction and potential graft loss. Shedding of large Contact Information: quantities of the virus in urine is common and does not Cincinnati Children’s Division of Pathology always indicate pathogenesis. A better measure of the Molecular and Genomic Pathology Services potential for nephropathy is viral load monitoring in the Phone: 513-636-9820 blood. Plasma is the preferred specimen for detection Fax: 513-803-2941 of viremia, and an elevated viremia in conjunction with Email: [email protected] high urine levels is often indicative of renal nephropathy. Website: cincinnatichildrens.org/pathology Real-time PCR provides a rapid and sensitive method For pricing or billing questions, call 513-636-9264. to determine the presence of target-specific amplifiable Shipping Address: nucleic acids in all samples intended for PCR1-3. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center For more information, call the lab at 513-636-9820. Lab Processing, B4.127 Attn: Molecular and Genomic Pathology Services (MGPS) 3333 Burnet Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporal Virus Serological Profiling of Kidney Graft Recipients Using Virscan
    Temporal virus serological profiling of kidney graft recipients using VirScan Pierre Isnarda,b,1, Tomasz Kulac,d,1, Véronique Avettand Fenoele,f, Dany Anglicheaua,b,f, Fabiola Terzia, Christophe Legendrea,b,f, Stephen J. Elledgec,d, and Guillaume Canauda,b,f,2 aINSERM U1151, Institut Necker Enfants Malades, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 75015 Paris, France; bService de Néphrologie Transplantation Adultes, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 75015 Paris, France; cDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; dDepartment of Genetics, Harvard University Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; eLaboratoire de Virologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 75015 Paris, France; and fUniversité Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, 75006 Paris, France Contributed by Stephen J. Elledge, April 7, 2019 (sent for review December 13, 2018; reviewed by Jae-Hyung Chang and Stephen R. Quake) At this time, pretransplant viral screening of donors and recipients is human virome, that is, all viruses known to infect humans, using a based on serological status and limited to certain viruses. After synthetic peptide array (7). VirScan is based on immunoprecipita- transplantation, patient follow-up is based on a monitoring strategy tion combined with next-generation sequencing of a bacteriophage using ELISA or PCR. Such approaches exclude other emerging viruses library containing peptides representing viruses known to infect that can affect the transplant outcome. Recently, a multiplex un- humans. The VirScan library displays viral peptides, each 56 amino biased array, VirScan, was developed. This tool allows the detection acids in length, from 206 species of viruses, corresponding to 1,000 of antibodies against viruses, using a synthetic human virome, with different strains known to infect humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Metagenomics in the Clinical Realm: Lessons Learned from a Swiss-Wide Ring Trial
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Viral Metagenomics in the Clinical Realm: Lessons Learned from a Swiss-Wide Ring Trial 1, 2, 2 2, Thomas Junier *, Michael Huber * , Stefan Schmutz , Verena Kufner y, 2, 3, 3, 4, Osvaldo Zagordi y, Stefan Neuenschwander y, Alban Ramette y , Jakub Kubacki y , 4, 5, 6, 6, Claudia Bachofen y, Weihong Qi y, Florian Laubscher y, Samuel Cordey y , 6, 7, 8 1,9 8, Laurent Kaiser y, Christian Beuret y, Valérie Barbié , Jacques Fellay and Aitana Lebrand * 1 Global Health Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Lausanne) & SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 2 Institute of Medical Virology, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland 3 Institute for Infectious Diseases, University of Bern, 3001 Bern, Switzerland 4 Institute of Virology, VetSuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland 5 Functional Genomics Center Zurich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich) & University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland 6 Laboratory of Virology, University Hospitals of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland; University of Geneva Medical School, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland 7 Biology Department, Spiez Laboratory, 3700 Spiez, Switzerland 8 Clinical Bioinformatics, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland 9 Precision Medicine Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected] (T.J.); [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (A.L.) These authors contributed equally. y Received: 30 July 2019; Accepted: 24 August 2019; Published: 28 August 2019 Abstract: Shotgun metagenomics using next generation sequencing (NGS) is a promising technique to analyze both DNA and RNA microbial material from patient samples.
    [Show full text]