September 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
CWSAC Report Update
U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields Commonwealth of Kentucky Washington, DC October 2008 Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields Commonwealth of Kentucky U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Washington, DC October 2008 Authority The American Battlefield Protection Program Act of 1996, as amended by the Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-359, 111 Stat. 3016, 17 December 2002), directs the Secretary of the Interior to update the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC) Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Acknowledgments NPS Project Team Paul Hawke, Project Leader; Kathleen Madigan, Survey Coordinator; Tanya Gossett, Reporting; Lisa Rupple and Shannon Davis, Preservation Specialists; Matthew Borders, Historian; Renee S. Novak and Gweneth Langdon, Interns. Battlefield Surveyor(s) Joseph E. Brent, Mudpuppy and Waterdog, Inc. Respondents Betty Cole, Barbourville Tourist and Recreation Commission; James Cass, Camp Wildcat Preservation Foundation; Tres Seymour, Battle for the Bridge Historic Preserve/Hart County Historical Society; Frank Fitzpatrick, Middle Creek National Battlefield Foundation, Inc.; Rob Rumpke, Battle of Richmond Association; Joan House, Kentucky Department of Parks; and William A. Penn. Cover: The Louisville-Nashville Railroad Bridge over the Green River, Munfordville, Kentucky. The stone piers are original to the 1850s. The battles of Munfordville and Rowlett’s Station were waged for control of the bridge and the railroad. Photograph by Joseph Brent. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... -
George Henry Thomas (July 31, 1816 – March 28, 1870)
George Henry Thomas (July 31, 1816 – March 28, 1870) "Rock of Chickamauga" "Sledge of Nashville" "Slow Trot Thomas" The City of Fort Thomas was named in honor of Major General George Henry Thomas, who ranks among the top Union Generals of the American Civil War. He was born of Welsh/English and French parents in Virginia on July 31, 1816, and was educated at Southampton Academy. Prior to his military service Thomas studied law and worked as a law deputy for his uncle, James Rochelle, the Clerk of the County Court before he received an appointment to West Point in 1836. He graduated 12th in his class of 42 in 1840 which William T. Sherman was a classmate. After receiving his commission as a 2nd Lieutenant in the 3rd Artillery Unit, he served the Army well for the next 30 years. He was made 1st Lieutenant for action against the Indians in Florida for his gallantry in action. In the Mexican War, he served under Braxton Bragg in the Artillery and was twice cited for gallantry—once at Monterey and the other at Buena Vista. From 1851-1854 was an instructor of artillery and cavalry at West Point, where he was promoted to Captain. Following his service at Ft. Yuma in the West, he became a Major and joined the 2nd Cavalry at Jefferson Barracks. The Colonel there was Albert Sidney Johnston and Robert E. Lee was the Lt. Colonel. Other officers in this regiment who were to become famous as Generals were George Stoneman, for the Union, and for the CSA, John B. -
GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, and the RECONSTRUCTION of CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented In
NEW CITIZENS: GERMAN IMMIGRANTS, AFRICAN AMERICANS, AND THE RECONSTRUCTION OF CITIZENSHIP, 1865-1877 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Alison Clark Efford, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Doctoral Examination Committee: Professor John L. Brooke, Adviser Approved by Professor Mitchell Snay ____________________________ Adviser Professor Michael L. Benedict Department of History Graduate Program Professor Kevin Boyle ABSTRACT This work explores how German immigrants influenced the reshaping of American citizenship following the Civil War and emancipation. It takes a new approach to old questions: How did African American men achieve citizenship rights under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments? Why were those rights only inconsistently protected for over a century? German Americans had a distinctive effect on the outcome of Reconstruction because they contributed a significant number of votes to the ruling Republican Party, they remained sensitive to European events, and most of all, they were acutely conscious of their own status as new American citizens. Drawing on the rich yet largely untapped supply of German-language periodicals and correspondence in Missouri, Ohio, and Washington, D.C., I recover the debate over citizenship within the German-American public sphere and evaluate its national ramifications. Partisan, religious, and class differences colored how immigrants approached African American rights. Yet for all the divisions among German Americans, their collective response to the Revolutions of 1848 and the Franco-Prussian War and German unification in 1870 and 1871 left its mark on the opportunities and disappointments of Reconstruction. -
Gen. George H. Thomas
Gen. George H. Thomas CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF THE UNION AND VICTIM OF GROSS HISTORICAL INJUSTICE (A Compendium Of Sources in Support Of The Argument) Robert N. Meiser Copyright © 2009 by Robert N. Meiser All rights reserved. Published in the United States of America by Robert N. Meiser 8700 Lothbury Court Fairfax VA 22031 Tel.: 703 560-5032 Email: [email protected] Library of Congress Control Number: 2008909604 This Compilation was originally published under the same title in 2003 on the internet. at AOTC.net. Cover Design by the author. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to acknowledge and thank Bob Redman for having read this Compilation and offered valuable comments and suggestions. Full responsibility for the contents nonetheless remains mine. I wish also to express my supreme admiration for the many scholars who have made this work possible. As noted, George Thomas placed trust in history to judge him fairly. Broadly speaking, history has thus far failed to discharge that trust. When it finally gets around to doing so, the scholars whose work has been compiled herein will have been the torch-bearers in that fine work, and it will have been their labors which will have contributed mightily. R.N.M. iii Table Of Contents BUT FOR THE SUCCESSFUL ATLANTA CAMPAIGN IT IS FAR FROM CERTAIN THAT THE UNION WOULD HAVE BEEN PRESERVED -------------------------------------------- 3 GEORGE THOMAS WAS THE PRINCIPAL FORCE BEHIND 3 THE SUCCESSFUL ATLANTA CAMPAIGN -------- 4 The Recorded, Undisputed Facts Of History ------------------- 4 4 The Testaments Of Scholars --------------------------------------- 21 4 The Nashville Experience After the Atlanta Campaign ------ 27 21 The Invalidity Of The Popular Counter Record 27 (with an explanation of the extent it was falsified, how it was falsified, and why) --------------------------- 33 v 33 33 PREFACE This compilation was first published on the internet in 2003. -
George Henry Thomas Was Appointed a Major General in the Regular Army
George Henry Thomas was appointed a major general in the During the Civil War, Rufus Ingalls was appointed a brevet major regular army and received a formal “Thanks of Congress” for his general in both the regular and volunteer Union forces. success in driving Confederate forces from Tennessee in 1864. (Library of Congress) (Library of Congress) P. G. T. (Pierre Gustave Toutant) Beauregard was one of only William Clarke Quantrill, in Confederate uniform, was not only seven “full” generals in the Confederate Army. a notorious Civil War guerrilla but a former civilian teamster, (National Archives) gambler, and camp cook with the Utah Expedition. (Kansas Historical Society.) APPENDIX A William P. MacKinnon ROOTED IN UTAH Civil War Strategy and Tactics, Generals and Guerrillas n addition to chapter 1, another way to illus- officers—Thomas and Ingalls—displayed Itrate the connection between the Utah and some nervousness over the “irregular” nature Civil Wars (and the impact of the former on of their communications; the more flamboy- the latter) is to probe the extent to which three ant Beauregard was unabashedly assertive. very prominent West Point–trained Civil War It may be helpful to provide a brief biogra- generals had earlier tried to influence pros- phy for each of these three officers, though it ecution of the Utah campaign. They did so will not do justice to their distinguished and by gratuitously sending long memos to their varied service careers. General George Henry military superiors or, in one case, to influen- Thomas (July 31, 1816–March 28, 1870) was tial politicians. These documents contained one of the Union army’s principal command- information about alternate approaches to the ers in the Western Theater and won Union Great Basin accompanied by strategic recom- victories across Kentucky and Tennessee. -
Bright Starry Banner: a Novel of the Civil War
Civil War Book Review Summer 2004 Article 14 Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War John Benson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Benson, John (2004) "Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 6 : Iss. 3 . Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol6/iss3/14 Benson: Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War Review Benson, John Summer 2004 Carter, Alden R. Bright Starry Banner: A Novel of the Civil War. Soho Press, Inc., $27.00 ISBN 1569473552 Way out west Battle of Stone's River retold Civil War history and fiction are rarely combined with any success. Alden R. Carter, attempts to venture where few have triumphed in Bright and Starry Banner and meets the same fate as countless other authors. Set in the shadows of the Stones River Campaign, Carter takes the reader into the minds of the Union and Confederate leaders who fought for victory in the west. Carter's principle character is Lieutenant Colonel Julius Garesche, the 41 year old chief of staff of the Union Army of the Cumberland, who begins the story with reluctant hopes as he begins service on the staff of Major General William S. Rosecrans, the army's newly appointed leader. Gradually we follow Garesche as he bears witness to a seesaw battle that develops into a stalemate, and with it, the continuing struggle. The Battle of Stones River, was fought around the Widow Smith House in Murfreesboro Tennessee from December 31, 1862 to January 2, 1863. -
Author Interview--David T. Dixon (Radical Warrior) Part 2
H-CivWar Author Interview--David T. Dixon (Radical Warrior) Part 2 Discussion published by Niels Eichhorn on Thursday, September 24, 2020 Hello H-CivWar Readers: Today we feature the second part of our interview with David T. Dixon to talk about his new book Radical Warrior: August Willich’s Journey from German Revolutionary to Union General, which came out with the University of Tennessee Press. Part 1 Obviously, I completely agree with your attitude about giving more attention to European experiences of European immigrants. At the same time, Willich seems torn in Europe. In part he is something of an ideologue but he does have his military background and much of his 1848 work is military. Do you think of him more as a soldier or as a political reformer in Europe, especially in 1848? DTD: Willich certainly had a difficult time breaking away for his military career, but by 1847 he was so utterly consumed with the plight of working class people and the disregard of their welfare by the monarchs of Europe, that he dedicated himself to radical political and social change for the rest of his life. I see him as a far-left activist who believed that violent revolution in Europe by an armed citizenry was the only feasible path to a more just and equitable society. So, in that sense, his military training and skills, combined with strong leadership talents, made him well-suited for the rebellion that took place in 1848 and 1849. So, he sounds very similar to Karl Marx. How did the two get along with each other? DTD: Not well. -
Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities
Urban Green Urban Green Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities Peter Harnik Washington | Covelo | London Copyright © 2010 The Trust for Public Land All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher: Island Press, Suite 300, 1718 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20009 ISLAND PRESS is a trademark of the Center for Resource Economics. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Harnik, Peter. Urban green : innovative parks for resurgent cities / Peter Harnik. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-1-59726-679-6 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-59726-679-5 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-1-59726-684-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-59726-684-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Urban parks—United States. 2. City planning—United States. 3. Open spaces—United States. 4. Urban renewal—United States. 5. Urban landscape architecture—United States. I. Title. SB482.A4H35 2010 712'.50973—dc22 2009043096 Printed using Times New Roman Text design and Typesetting by Paul Hotvedt, Blue Heron Typesetting Printed by Printed on recycled, acid-free paper Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Keywords: urban parks, park planning and design, urban redevelopment, community gardens, landfills, wetlands and stormwater sewage ponds, rail trails, green roofs, schoolyard parks, covered resevoirs, river and stream corridors, cemetary parks, boulevards and parkways, decked highways, removing parking To Andrew and Rebecca and their up-and-coming generation Contents Foreword by Michael R. -
November Meeting 2013 Richard B
Newsletter of the Civil War Round Table of Atlanta Founded 1949 November 2013 607th Meeting Leon McElveen, Editor Brian Wills to Receive the November Meeting 2013 Richard B. Harwell Award Reservations Are Required One of our own, Dr. Brian Steel Wills, will be on PLEASE MAIL IN YOUR DINNER hand in November to receive 2013 The Richard RESERVATION CHECK OF $33.00 PER Barksdale Harwell Award for his work, George PERSON TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS: Henry Thomas: As True as Steel. This award is presented annually by our Round Table for the David Floyd best book on a Civil War subject published the 4696 Kellogg Drive, SW preceding year. Lilburn, GA 30047- 4408 Brian is the Director of the Civil War Center and TO REACH DAVID NO LATER THAN NOON Professor of History at Kennesaw State ON THE FRIDAY PRECEDING THE MEETING University. He came to KSU after a long tenure at E-mail and telephone reservations will not the University of Virginia's College at Wise. He is be accepted the author of numerous works relating to the American Civil War, including a new biography - Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 Confederate General William Dorsey Pender: Time: Cocktails: ......... 5:30 pm The Hope of Glory. His other titles include: A Dinner: ............. 7:00 pm Battle From the Start: The Life of Nathan Bedford Forrest Reprinted as: The Confederacy's Place: Capital City Club - Downtown Greatest Cavalryman: Nathan Bedford Forrest. 7 John Portman Blvd. The War in Southeastern Virginia, (2001), and No Price: $33.00 per person Ordinary College: A History of The University of Virginia's College at Wise, (2004), Gone with the Program: Dr. -
Yes, the Statue of Robert E.Lee Should Be Removed from the US Capitol
From: Helen Michie Sent time: 07/23/2020 08:19:34 AM To: [email protected] Yes, the statue of Robert E.Lee should be removed from the US Capitol. Helen Gettys Michie From: Diana Smith Sent time: 07/23/2020 10:43:57 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Comments on Lee Statue in Capitol I was shocked to learn that the man who led an Army against the United States of America; whose Army killed and maimed thousands of America soldiers; who fought to protect slave owning rights -- has a place of honor in the USA Capitol. His history is of treason and inhumanity and should not be glorified or memorialized anywhere, let alone the Capitol! Only the best, brightest, bravest patriots should be in the Capitol -- extolling the virtues of Americans, leadership, industry, humanity, and achievement. There is nothing to extoll about Lee. Let his story be told factually in books and not displayed fallaciously in the Capitol He is not an American. He is a traitor. Please remove him. Thank you Diana Smith From: Josh G Sent time: 07/23/2020 11:51:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Written Comment for Removal of Lee Statue and replace with Mildred and Richard Loving It's been said that funerals are for the living. So too are statues. Statues have meaning, they convey a message to the living. Who are we? What should we strive for? Where do we come from? Who do we want to be? The Robert E. Lee statue must come down. -
September 2014 General Orders Vol. 26 No. 1
Vol. 26 General Orders No. 1 Sept Jennings’ Brigade 2014 www.houstoncivilwar.com forces reached the environs of Atlanta. A SEPTEMBER 2014 MEETING Confederate captured the mood among his Thursday, September 18, 2014 comrades when he responded to an opposing picket’s inquires as to who commanded them The HESS Club now with the name “Sherman.” “How’s that?” the 5430 Westheimer Rd @ Westheimer Way startled bluecoat replied. “Well, when you move 6:00 Cash Bar we move,” he explained. 7:00 Dinner & Meeting The greater part of this forward movement E-Mail Reservation is Preferred; slowed as Union troops encountered formidable at [email protected] Confederate defense lines and a new Southern or call Don Zuckero at (281) 479-1232 commander, the pugilistic John Bell Hood. Hood by 6 PM on Monday Sept 15, 2014 quickly lived up to his reputation as a fighter with Dinner $28; Lecture Only $10 significant encounters at Peachtree Creek on July 20 and the battles of Atlanta and Ezra *** Reservations are Required *** Church on July 22 and 28 respectively. From FOR BOTH DINNER and LECTURE ONLY this point, Sherman determined that a greater object lesson might be achieved than simply defeating an opposing force or driving it from the The HCWRT Presents city. Atlanta, itself, and its residents, should be made to feel the hard hand of war. In the Brian Steel Wills, Ph.D. evening of August 7, he informed Henry Halleck, And his discourse on: “whether we get inside Atlanta or not it will be a used up community by the time we get done with Sherman Aims for Atlanta: 1864 it.” Over the next weeks, Sherman determined to make good on that promise. -
Leadership and Social Movements: the Forty-Eighters in the Civil War
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES LEADERSHIP AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS: THE FORTY-EIGHTERS IN THE CIVIL WAR Christian Dippel Stephan Heblich Working Paper 24656 http://www.nber.org/papers/w24656 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2018 We thank the editor and two referees for very helpful suggestions, as well as Daron Acemoglu, Sascha Becker, Toman Barsbai, Jean-Paul Carvalho, Dora Costa, James Feigenbaum, Raquel Fernandez, Paola Giuliano, Walter Kamphoefner, Michael Haines, Tarek Hassan, Saumitra Jha, Matthew Kahn, Naomi Lamoreaux, Gary Libecap, Zach Sauers, Jakob Schneebacher, Elisabeth Perlman, Nico Voigtländer, John Wallis, Romain Wacziarg, Gavin Wright, Guo Xu, and seminar participants at UCLA, U Calgary, Bristol, the NBER DAE and POL meetings, the EHA meetings, and the UCI IMBS conference for valuable comments. We thank David Cruse, Andrew Dale, Karene Daniel, Andrea di Miceli, Jake Kantor, Zach Lewis, Josh Mimura, Rose Niermeijer, Sebastian Ottinger, Anton Sobolev, Gwyneth Teo, and Alper Yesek for excellent research assistance. We thank Michael Haines for sharing data. We thank Yannick Dupraz and Andreas Ferrara for data-sharing and joint efforts in collecting the Civil War soldier and regiments data. We thank John Wallis and Jeremy Darrington for helpful advice in locating sub-county voting data for the period, although we ultimately could not use it. Dippel acknowledges financial support for this project from the UCLA Center of Global Management, the UCLA Price Center and the UCLA Burkle Center. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.