DOCSLIB.ORG

The Utilization of Robo-Advisors by Individual Investors: an Analysis Using Diffusion of Innovation and Information Search Frameworks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Utilization of Robo-Advisors by Individual Investors: an Analysis Using Diffusion of Innovation and Information Search Frameworks The Utilization of Robo-Advisors by Individual Investors: An Analysis Using Diffusion of Innovation and Information Search Frameworks Lu Fana and Swarn Chatterjeeb This study examines the roles of internal and external search characteristics and attitudinal factors in investors’ decisions to utilize robo-advisor-based platforms. Using the 2015 state-by-state National Financial Capability Study and Investor Survey, this study finds that the need to free up time, higher risk tolerance, higher subjective financial knowledge, and higher amounts of investable assets were positively associated with individual investors’ adoption of robo-advisors. Additionally, the results from the interaction model indicates that individuals under 65 with a higher risk tolerance and greater perceived investment knowledge were more likely to use robo-advisors. Implications of the key findings for scholars, practitioners, and industry leaders are included. Keywords: financial literacy, fintech, financial planning, information search, investment knowledge, robo-advisor ntense debates continue about the comparisons between However, it is notable that some robo-advisor features, robo-advisors and traditional human financial advi- including easy accessibility, automated operations and port- Isors. Robo-advisory services (also referred to as robos) folio management, portfolio recommendations, low human have become increasingly popular and have continued involvement, and the digitalized financial technology, may to increase in number since 2008. The economic recov- be attractive to different groups of users and contribute to ery from the recent financial crisis has paved the way the diversity of the financial planning and wealth manage- for financial technology (fintech) and financial digitaliza- ment industry in terms of service delivery and investment tion to make financial services and products more cost- digitalization. efficient and accessible for the majority of investors. The competition resulting from the emergence of robo- In general, robo-advisors are computer-automated invest- advisors has catalyzed a lower-fee environment and forced ment platforms. A typical user completes a question- many traditional financial services firms to consider revis- naire regarding the investment time horizon, goals, and ing their fee structures or integrating robo-advisory plat- risk tolerance. The robo-advisor then incorporates these forms into their offerings to remain competitive in the answers into a complex programmed algorithm to generate market. an optimal customized portfolio for the client. Currently, U.S.-based robo-advisors, such as Betterment, Wealthfront, Meanwhile, traditional human financial advisors face chal- Schwab Intelligent Portfolio, and others are being utilized lenges brought about by the increasing presence of robo- by early adopters, due to their lower cost compared to tra- advisor-based services. Successful traditional client-facing ditional human-involved financial advice systems (Rosen- financial advisors develop deep relationships with clients berg, 2018). over time, invest more time in providing services, and also utilize quality administrative and executive support to One key reason for the fast-growing robo-advisor plat- manage and operate their advisory firms (Kitces, 2018). forms is the comparatively lower costs associated with their aAssistant Professor, Department of Personal Financial Planning, University of Missouri, 239 Stanley Hall, Columbia, MO 65211. E-mail: [email protected] bRedwood Professor, Department of Financial Planning, Housing and Consumer Economics, University of Georgia, 205 Dawson Hall, Athens, GA 30602. E-mail: [email protected] Pdf_Folio:130 130 Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, Volume 31, Number 1, 2020, 130-145 © 2020 Association for Financial Counseling and Planning Education® http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/JFCP-18-00078 services. Using a dataset with 250 global robo-advisors, (b) annual management fees, (c) investment products and researchers showed that the average annual fee for tradi- asset allocation in the portfolio, (d) tax services, (e) goal- tional financial advisors was 0.7% of assets under manage- based planning, and (f) automation (Ludwig, 2018; Phoon ment; whereas by comparison, fewer than 20% of the robo- & Koh, 2017). Several U.S.-based robo-advisors have also advisory companies charged fees higher than 0.7%, and begun providing tax planning services to their clients along none of the robo-advisors that charged the higher fees were with sophisticated tax planning strategies such as ”tax loss located in the United States. Additionally, robo-advisor uti- harvesting” (Phoon & Koh, 2017). Tax-planning features lization has been associated with increased investment con- and goals-based investment advisory styles have also con- fidence among the participating investors (Phoon & Koh, tributed to robo-advisors’ popularity. 2017). Some features and functionalities offered by robo- advisors, such as automatic deposits, rebalancing, tax-loss Successful robo-advisor platforms provide automated port- harvesting, and asset allocation of the portfolio, and so forth. folio allocation techniques at a cost lower than the more simplify investment and portfolio management for users. In conventional human interaction-based investment advisory fact, according to a recent LendEDU report, almost half of services (Phoon & Koh, 2017). There are other benefits of millennials are intimidated when it comes to engaging with robo-advisory platforms as well. For example, Salo (2017) a human financial advisor (Brown, 2017). Therefore, robo- summarized that robo-advisors usually offer more consis- advisors are expected to play an even larger role in the future tent and neutral investment recommendations than those by effectively attracting potential new investors and, in the offered by human advisors, as human nature may cause process, increasing the general financial advisory service bias and inconsistency. Ease of use is another advantage inclusion, especially for segments of the population in their that robos provide over human advisors. First, most robos prime stage of wealth accumulation. require minimum information input and less frequent infor- mation update from clients. This format may be more con- However, limited research to date has investigated robo- venient for those who wish to save their time. Additionally, advisor adoption behavior. This study therefore addresses robos provide easy accessibility to users, meaning that users the need for a systematic framework to understand robo- can monitor and manage their portfolios via their computers advisor adoption and utilization among individuals and or mobile devices without any time or other limitations. households. The diffusion of innovation theory (Rogers, 1962) and the information search model (Beales, Mazis, There are, however, some factors preventing people Salop, & Staelin, 1981) provide theoretical support for the from adopting robo-advisors. For example, according to analysis of the new developments in financial technology- a research poll conducted by LendEDU, although it is based platforms and help understand the importance of believed that millennials are the targeted users of robo- information sources as they relate to the robo-advisor uti- advisors, the majority (more than 75.7%) reported not hav- lization decision-making process. ing worked with any type of robo-advisor. The biggest rea- son behind this was that most millennials had never heard Literature Review and Hypotheses of robos, followed by their fear that robo-advisors may Previous Research not be as efficient as human advisors in preventing poten- There have been various definitions of the term “robo- tial losses (Brown, 2017). In the same report, those who advisor.” For example, Sironi (2016) clearly defined robo- showed a favorable attitude toward robos believed that the advisors as “automated investment solutions which engage most important advantage stems from the easiness of initi- individuals with digital tools featuring advanced customer ating the investment process with robo-advisory platforms, experience,” and robo-advisors are “conveniently supported followed by their constant accessibility, cost-efficiency, by portfolio rebalancing techniques using trading algo- technology, and tax-efficiency. Moreover, LendEDU doc- rithms” (p. 8). Fein (2015) depicted robo-advisors as “a umented in another report that there might be some over- growing number of Internet-based investment advisory ser- optimism among millennial robo-advisor users (Hamory, vices aimed at retail investors” (p. 2). Investors typically 2018). Interestingly, almost half (42.25%) of participat- need to consider several factors when using financial advi- ing millennial investors expected robo-advisors to outper- sors,Pdf_Folio:131 including (a) minimum initial investment amount, form the market. Since most robos recommend portfolios Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, Volume 31, Number 1, 2020 131 consisting of Exchange-traded funds ETFs and use passive the portfolios generated by these robos, based on a moder- management, it is more likely that the portfolio would track ately risk-tolerant user, were focused on short-term returns or sometimes even underperform the market. It is also sur- (an average of 3–5 years) rather than long-term accumu- prising to see that most participants reported their invest- lations. Moreover, they also found that the average user’s ment horizon using robo-advisors as falling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Asset Securitization
    L-Sec Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Asset Securitization Comptroller’s Handbook November 1997 L Liquidity and Funds Management Asset Securitization Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background 1 Definition 2 A Brief History 2 Market Evolution 3 Benefits of Securitization 4 Securitization Process 6 Basic Structures of Asset-Backed Securities 6 Parties to the Transaction 7 Structuring the Transaction 12 Segregating the Assets 13 Creating Securitization Vehicles 15 Providing Credit Enhancement 19 Issuing Interests in the Asset Pool 23 The Mechanics of Cash Flow 25 Cash Flow Allocations 25 Risk Management 30 Impact of Securitization on Bank Issuers 30 Process Management 30 Risks and Controls 33 Reputation Risk 34 Strategic Risk 35 Credit Risk 37 Transaction Risk 43 Liquidity Risk 47 Compliance Risk 49 Other Issues 49 Risk-Based Capital 56 Comptroller’s Handbook i Asset Securitization Examination Objectives 61 Examination Procedures 62 Overview 62 Management Oversight 64 Risk Management 68 Management Information Systems 71 Accounting and Risk-Based Capital 73 Functions 77 Originations 77 Servicing 80 Other Roles 83 Overall Conclusions 86 References 89 ii Asset Securitization Introduction Background Asset securitization is helping to shape the future of traditional commercial banking. By using the securities markets to fund portions of the loan portfolio, banks can allocate capital more efficiently, access diverse and cost- effective funding sources, and better manage business risks. But securitization markets offer challenges as well as opportunity. Indeed, the successes of nonbank securitizers are forcing banks to adopt some of their practices. Competition from commercial paper underwriters and captive finance companies has taken a toll on banks’ market share and profitability in the prime credit and consumer loan businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification
    WORKING PAPER NO. 212 Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification Luigi Guiso and Tullio Jappelli January 2009 University of Naples Federico II University of Salerno Bocconi University, Milan CSEF - Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS – UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES 80126 NAPLES - ITALY Tel. and fax +39 081 675372 – e-mail: [email protected] WORKING PAPER NO. 212 Financial Literacy and Portfolio Diversification Luigi Guiso and Tullio Jappelli Abstract In this paper we focus on poor financial literacy as one potential factor explaining lack of portfolio diversification. We use the 2007 Unicredit Customers’ Survey, which has indicators of portfolio choice, financial literacy and many demographic characteristics of investors. We first propose test-based indicators of financial literacy and document the extent of portfolio under-diversification. We find that measures of financial literacy are strongly correlated with the degree of portfolio diversification. We also compare the test-based degree of financial literacy with investors’ self-assessment of their financial knowledge, and find only a weak relation between the two measures, an issue that has gained importance after the EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MIFID) has required financial institutions to rate investors’ financial sophistication through questionnaires. JEL classification: E2, D8, G1 Keywords: Financial literacy, Portfolio diversification. Acknowledgements: We are grateful to the Unicredit Group, and particularly to Daniele Fano and Laura Marzorati, for letting us contribute to the design and use of the UCS survey. European University Institute and CEPR. Università di Napoli Federico II, CSEF and CEPR. Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. The portfolio diversification puzzle 3. The data 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory
    Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports Arbitrage Pricing Theory Gur Huberman Zhenyu Wang Staff Report no. 216 August 2005 This paper presents preliminary findings and is being distributed to economists and other interested readers solely to stimulate discussion and elicit comments. The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily reflective of views at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Arbitrage Pricing Theory Gur Huberman and Zhenyu Wang Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, no. 216 August 2005 JEL classification: G12 Abstract Focusing on capital asset returns governed by a factor structure, the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) is a one-period model, in which preclusion of arbitrage over static portfolios of these assets leads to a linear relation between the expected return and its covariance with the factors. The APT, however, does not preclude arbitrage over dynamic portfolios. Consequently, applying the model to evaluate managed portfolios is contradictory to the no-arbitrage spirit of the model. An empirical test of the APT entails a procedure to identify features of the underlying factor structure rather than merely a collection of mean-variance efficient factor portfolios that satisfies the linear relation. Key words: arbitrage, asset pricing model, factor model Huberman: Columbia University Graduate School of Business (e-mail: [email protected]). Wang: Federal Reserve Bank of New York and University of Texas at Austin McCombs School of Business (e-mail: [email protected]). This review of the arbitrage pricing theory was written for the forthcoming second edition of The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by Lawrence Blume and Steven Durlauf (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
    [Show full text]
  • Building Efficient Hedge Fund Portfolios August 2017
    Building Efficient Hedge Fund Portfolios August 2017 Investors typically allocate assets to hedge funds to access return, risk and diversification characteristics they can’t get from other investments. The hedge fund universe includes a wide variety of strategies and styles that can help investors achieve this objective. Why then, do so many investors make significant allocations to hedge fund strategies that provide the least portfolio benefit? In this paper, we look to hedge fund data for evidence that investors appear to be missing out on the core benefits of hedge fund investing and we attempt to understand why. The. Basics Let’s start with the assumption that an investor’s asset allocation is fairly similar to the general investing population. That is, the portfolio is dominated by equities and equity‐like risk. Let’s also assume that an investor’s reason for allocating to hedge funds is to achieve a more efficient portfolio, i.e., higher return per unit of risk taken. In order to make a portfolio more efficient, any allocation to hedge funds must include some combination of the following (relative to the overall portfolio): Higher return Lower volatility Lower correlation The Goal Identify return streams that deliver any or all of the three characteristics listed above. In a perfect world, the best allocators would find return streams that accomplish all three of these goals ‐ higher return, lower volatility, and lower correlation. In the real world, that is quite difficult to do. There are always trade‐ offs. In some cases, allocators accept tradeoffs to increase the probability of achieving specific objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Portfolio Financing on Alpha Generation by H…
    The Impact of Portfolio Financing on Alpha Generation by Hedge Funds An S3 Asset Management Commentary by Robert Sloan, Managing Partner and Krishna Prasad, Partner S3 Asset Management 590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: 212-759-5222 www.S3asset.com September 2004 Building a successful hedge fund requires more than just the traditional three Ps of Pedigree, Performance and Philosophy. As hedge funds’ popularity increases, it is increasingly clear that Process needs to be considered the 4th P in alpha generation. Clearly, balance sheet management, also known as securities or portfolio financing, is a key element of “process” as it adds to alpha (the hedge fund manager’s excess rate of return as compared to a benchmark). Typically, hedge funds surrender their balance sheet to their prime broker and do not fully understand the financing alpha that they often leave on the table. The prime brokerage business is an oligopoly and the top three providers virtually control the pricing of securities financing. Hedge funds and their investors therefore need to pay close heed to the value provided by their prime broker as it has a direct impact on alpha and the on-going health of a fund. Abstract As investors seek absolute returns, hedge funds have grown exponentially over the past decade. In the quest for better performance, substantial premium is being placed on alpha generation skills. Now, more than ever before, there is a great degree of interest in deconstructing and better understanding the drivers of hedge fund alpha. Investors and hedge fund managers have focused on the relevance of asset allocation, stock selection, portfolio construction and trading costs on alpha.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Gold in Today's Global Multi-Asset Portfolio
    Gold October 2019 The Role of Gold in Today’s Global Multi-Asset Portfolio SPDR® Gold Strategy Team Investors have often used gold tactically in their portfolios, with an aim to help preserve wealth during market corrections, times of geopolitical stress or persistent dollar weakness. But given gold’s historically low or negative correlation with most other asset classes (See Figures 2 and 3), we believe that in addition to gold’s tactical benefits, its function as a core diversifying asset may demonstrate that gold can potentially play a more long-term strategic role in an investor’s portfolio. In fact, research has shown that the modern multi-asset portfolio may be more efficient with a strategic allocation to gold playing a crucial role as a potential core diversifier.1 In this paper, we examine how including gold in a hypothetical multi-asset portfolio that also includes global stocks, various classes of fixed income, real estate, private equity, and commodities may improve its risk-return characteristics. We found that holding between 2% and 10% of SPDR® Gold Shares (GLD®) between January 1, 20052 and September 30, 2019 may have improved the hypothetical portfolio’s cumulative returns and Sharpe ratio and lowered its maximum drawdown, as compared to a portfolio without any gold-backed investments. See Figure 7 for asset weightings of hypothetical portfolios. Gold as an Investable Since 1971, when President Nixon removed the US dollar from the gold standard, the price of gold Asset: From IPO to ETF has increased from $43.28/oz. to $1,485.30/oz at the end of September 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Factor Models and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
    Multi-Factor Models and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) Econ 471/571, F19 - Bollerslev APT 1 Introduction The empirical failures of the CAPM is not really that surprising ,! We had to make a number of strong and pretty unrealistic assumptions to arrive at the CAPM ,! All investors are rational, only care about mean and variance, have the same expectations, ... ,! Also, identifying and measuring the return on the market portfolio of all risky assets is difficult, if not impossible (Roll Critique) In this lecture series we will study an alternative approach to asset pricing called the Arbitrage Pricing Theory, or APT ,! The APT was originally developed in 1976 by Stephen A. Ross ,! The APT starts out by specifying a number of “systematic” risk factors ,! The only risk factor in the CAPM is the “market” Econ 471/571, F19 - Bollerslev APT 2 Introduction: Multiple Risk Factors Stocks in the same industry tend to move more closely together than stocks in different industries ,! European Banks (some old data): Source: BARRA Econ 471/571, F19 - Bollerslev APT 3 Introduction: Multiple Risk Factors Other common factors might also affect stocks within the same industry ,! The size effect at work within the banking industry (some old data): Source: BARRA ,! How does this compare to the CAPM tests that we just talked about? Econ 471/571, F19 - Bollerslev APT 4 Multiple Factors and the CAPM Suppose that there are only two fundamental sources of systematic risks, “technology” and “interest rate” risks Suppose that the return on asset i follows the
    [Show full text]
  • Hedge Funds: Finding the Right Allocation
    Hedge Funds: Finding the Right Allocation Some hedge funds have garnered outstanding returns in recent years, but it’s crucial to consider a number of key factors before deciding how much to invest HEDGE FUNDS REPRESENT A NEW FRONTIER FOR going to go up—the longs—but also sell short the stocks much of the broad investing public. Recent newspaper he thinks are going to go down. And hedge fund man- headlines have trumpeted their spectacular successes agers can access a variety of financial instruments, like and equally spectacular failures. So the question invest- stock and bond index futures and options, and other ment managers hear most frequently from their clients financial derivatives such as swaps, caps and floors, and comes as no surprise: How much should I invest in currency forwards. They also have the ability to tap into hedge funds? some unique investment strategies in which performance may have little to do with the general ups and downs of In order to answer that question, it’s imperative to sepa- the markets. rate the facts from the hype. There’s no question that hedge fund investments have grown tremendously, from For example, a number of hedge funds seek out returns $200 billion in 1995 to $1.1 trillion just 10 years later.1 by betting on events. Merger arbitrage funds focus on They’ve attracted investors from across the wealth spec- the outcome of mergers following this logic: Shares of trum—from professional investors like large university stocks about to be acquired can trade at a discount to endowments and pension plans to some of the world’s the offer price, reflecting the risk that the deal won’t go wealthiest families and, more and more, the so-called through.
    [Show full text]
  • Achieving Portfolio Diversification for Individuals with Low Financial
    sustainability Article Achieving Portfolio Diversification for Individuals with Low Financial Sustainability Yongjae Lee 1 , Woo Chang Kim 2 and Jang Ho Kim 3,* 1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Korea; [email protected] 2 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Korea; [email protected] 3 Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 August 2020; Accepted: 26 August 2020; Published: 30 August 2020 Abstract: While many individuals make investments to gain financial stability, most individual investors hold under-diversified portfolios that consist of only a few financial assets. Lack of diversification is alarming especially for average individuals because it may result in massive drawdowns in their portfolio returns. In this study, we analyze if it is theoretically feasible to construct fully risk-diversified portfolios even for the small accounts of not-so-rich individuals. In this regard, we formulate an investment size constrained mean-variance portfolio selection problem and investigate the relationship between the investment amount and diversification effect. Keywords: portfolio size; portfolio diversification; individual investor; financial sustainability 1. Introduction Achieving financial sustainability is a basic goal for everyone and it has become a shared concern globally due to increasing life expectancy. Low financial sustainability may refer to individuals with low financial wealth, as well as investors with a lack of financial literacy. Especially for individuals with limited wealth, financial sustainability after retirement is a real concern because of uncertainty in pension plans arising from relatively early retirement age and change in the demographic structure (see, for example, [1,2]).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Portfolio Size on the Financial Performance of Portfolios of Investment Firms in Kenya
    THE EFFECT OF PORTFOLIO SIZE ON THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF PORTFOLIOS OF INVESTMENT FIRMS IN KENYA PRESENTED BY MBOGO PETER KIMANI: D61/61748/2010 A Research Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Business Administration (MBA), School of Business, University of Nairobi. AUGUST 2012 DECLARATION This research project is my original work and has not been submitted for the award of a degree in any other university. Signed: …………..……………………………….. Date: ………………………… Mbogo Peter Kimani Reg. No.: D61 /61748/2010 This research project has been submitted for examination with my approval as university supervisor. Signed: …………………………………………… Date: ………………………… Dr. Josiah Aduda Lecturer, Department of Finance and Accounting ii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my wife and my children for their support during its preparation. Your patience and encouragement as I stayed away for long, either in class throughout the weekends, or in the field was really touching. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A major research project like this is never the work of anyone alone. The contributions of many different people, in their different ways, have made this possible. First, I would like to thank God for the wisdom and perseverance that HE has bestowed upon me during this research project, and indeed, throughout my life. Second, I offer my sincerest gratitude to my supervisors; Dr. Josiah Aduda and Mr. Mirie Mwangi who have supported me throughout this research project with their patience and knowledge whilst allowing me the room to work in my own way. I appreciate the odd hours we spent discussing the reports. I wish to thank the respondents who participated in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Securitization Process
    Asset-Backed Securities The Securitization Process Prof. Ian Giddy Stern School of Business New York University Asset-Backed Securities q The basic idea q What’s needed? q The technique q Applications q Typical sequence Copyright ©2001 Ian H. Giddy globalsecuritization.com The Securitization Process3 Securitization of Assets q Securitization is the transformation of an illiquid asset into a security. q For example, a group of consumer loans can be transformed into a publically-issued debt security. q A security is tradable, and therefore more liquid than the underlying loan or receivables. Securitization of assets can lower risk, add liquidity, and improve economic efficiency. q Sometimes,assets are worth more off the balance sheet than on it. Copyright ©2001 Ian H. Giddy globalsecuritization.com The Securitization Process4 What is the Technique for Creating Asset-Backed Securities? q A lender originates loans, such as to a homeowner or corporation. q The securitization structure is added. The bank or firm sells or assigns certain assets, such as consumer receivables, to a special purpose vehicle. q The structure is legally insulated from management q Credit enhancement and rating agency reviews q The SPV issues debt, dividing up the benefits (and risks) among investors on a pro-rata basis Copyright ©2001 Ian H. Giddy globalsecuritization.com The Securitization Process5 Securitization: The Basic Structure SPONSORING COMPANY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SALE OR ASSIGNMENT SPECIAL PURPOSE VEHICLE ISSUES ACCOUNTS ASSET-BACKED RECEIVABLE CERTIFICATES Copyright ©2001 Ian H. Giddy globalsecuritization.com The Securitization Process6 The Process IsIs the the company company ready?ready? AreAre the the assets assets suitable?suitable? WhatWhat pool? pool? WhatWhat legal legal structure?structure? WhatWhat credit credit enhancement?enhancement? Copyright ©2001 Ian H.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Guide to Asset Allocation
    GUIDE TO ASSET ALLOCATION THE VALUE OF PROFESSIONAL ADVICE Determining your financial goals—a comfortable retirement, a college education for the kids, a new home—may not be too complicated, but developing an appropriate asset allocation plan designed to help you meet those goals can be. Working with a financial professional can help. They offer market knowledge and planning expertise, and will take into account your individual investment needs to create an investment strategy tailored to your specific investment goals and risk tolerance. Chances are your financial professional will also want to review your portfolio with you regularly to determine if adjustments are needed to keep your asset allocation plan on target or make changes as your life goals/circumstances change. A FEW WORDS ABOUT ASSET ALLOCATION While an asset allocation plan can be a valuable tool to help reduce overall volatility, diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against a loss. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Typically, the greater the potential return, the more risk involved. Generally, investors should be comfortable with some fluctuation in the value of their investments, especially over the short term. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions. Small-capitalization stocks can be more volatile than large-capitalization stocks. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as the prices of bonds in a fund adjust to a rise in interest rates, that fund’s share price may decline. Foreign investing carries additional risks such as currency and market volatility and political or social instability; risks which are heightened in emerging markets.
    [Show full text]