DOCSLIB.ORG

Name of Contributor Date of Contributi on Amount Recipient Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Name of Contributor Date of Contributi on Amount Recipient Of Pursuant to the Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct, to which Carlyle is a signatory, Carlyle is required to disclose certain political contributions by its senior officers, their household members, and key employees (the “Disclosure Persons”). The required details of such political contributions by Carlyle’s Disclosure Persons over the last two years are set forth below. The address for each of the Disclosure Persons is c/o The Carlyle Group, 1001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 220 South, Washington, D.C., 20004‐2505. Date of Recipient of Name of Contributor Contributi Amount Office Federal/State/City/Locality Contribution on Rudy Giuliani Rodney Cohen 5/21/2007 $1,000 Presidential Committee, President Federal Managing Director Inc. Rodney Cohen Chris Dodd for 9/30/2007 $2,000 President Federal Managing Director President, Inc. Allan Holt 1/25/2008 $5,000 Straight Talk America President Federal Managing Director Daniel D’Aniello Dave Camp for House of Managing Director & 2/5/2008 $4,600 Federal Congress 2010 Representatives Co‐Founder Robert Stuckey Republican National 2/13/2008 $1,000 Federal Managing Director Committee Bruce Rosenblum Mark R. Warner, 2/28/2008 $2,300 Senator Federal Managing Director Friends of Mark Warner Robert Stuckey Republican National 4/10/2008 $2,500 Federal Managing Director Committee Olivier Sarkozy National Republican 4/25/2008 $5,000 Senator Federal Managing Director Senatorial Committee Note: The above disclosure includes all state and local contributions regardless of whether the recipient would be deemed an “Official” or “Public Pension Fund Official,” as defined in the Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct. TCG01042013 David Marchick Rahm Emanuel, Friends House of 4/30/2008 $1,000 Federal Managing Director of Rahm Emanuel Representatives William E. Conway, Jr. Rahm Emanuel, Friends House of Managing Director & 5/6/2008 $2,300 Federal of Rahm Emanuel Representatives Co‐Founder Barry Gold 5/13/2008 $2,300 Richard C. Shelby Senator Federal Managing Director William E. Conway, Jr. Managing Director & 5/13/2008 $2,300 Richard C. Shelby Senator Federal Co‐Founder Daniel D’Aniello Managing Director & 5/13/2008 $3,000 Richard C. Shelby Senator Federal Co‐Founder Olivier Sarkozy Mark R. Warner, 5/16/2008 $1,000 Senator Federal Managing Director Friends of Mark Warner Olivier Sarkozy Tom Udall, Udall for Us 5/20/2008 $1,000 Senator Federal Managing Director All Glenn Youngkin Frank R. Wolf, Friends House of 5/21/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director of Frank Wolf Representatives Chris Ullman 5/22/2008 $250 Richard C. Shelby Senator Federal Managing Director Jeff Ferguson 5/22/2008 $1,500 Richard C. Shelby Senator Federal Managing Director Bruce Rosenblum 5/22/2008 $2,300 Richard C. Shelby Senator Federal Managing Director Note: The above disclosure includes all state and local contributions regardless of whether the recipient would be deemed an “Official” or “Public Pension Fund Official,” as defined in the Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct. TCG01042013 Allan Holt 5/22/2008 $2,300 Richard C. Shelby Senator Federal Managing Director Peter Clare 6/1/2008 $10,000 McCain Victory 2008 President Federal Managing Director Glenn Youngkin 6/10/2008 $2,300 Richard C. Shelby Senator Federal Managing Director Lee Carson Cynthis Marie Lummis, House of 6/16/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director Lummis for Congress Representatives Edward Mathias Rahm Emanuel, Friends House of 6/30/2008 $250 Federal Managing Director of Rahm Emanuel Representatives Bruce Rosenblum Rahm Emanuel, Friends House of 6/30/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director of Rahm Emanuel Representatives Allan Holt Republican National 6/30/2008 $22,700 Federal Managing Director Committee Allan Holt Rahm Emanuel, Friends House of 6/30/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director of Rahm Emanuel Representatives Mitch McConnell, Jon Colby 7/10/2008 $500 McConnell Senate Senator Federal Managing Director Committee ‘14 William E. Conway, Jr. Mitch McConnell, Managing Director & 7/10/2008 $2,300 McConnell Senate Senator Federal Co‐Founder Committee ‘14 Daniel D’Aniello Mitch McConnell, Managing Director & 7/10/2008 $2,300 McConnell Senate Senator Federal Co‐Founder Committee ‘14 Note: The above disclosure includes all state and local contributions regardless of whether the recipient would be deemed an “Official” or “Public Pension Fund Official,” as defined in the Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct. TCG01042013 Greg Summe Bruce Lunsford, Friends 7/15/2008 $1,000 Senator Federal Managing Director of Bruce Lunsford Mitch McConnell, Glenn Youngkin 7/16/2008 $2,300 McConnell Senate Senator Federal Managing Director Committee ‘14 Mitch McConnell, Bruce Rosenblum 7/16/2008 $2,300 McConnell Senate Senator Federal Managing Director Committee ‘14 Peter Clare Richard E. Neal for House of 7/23/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director Congress Committee Representatives Peter Clare McConnell Senate 7/23/2008 $2,300 Senator Federal Managing Director Committee 2008 Harry Alverson House of 7/24/2008 $500 Richard Neal Federal Managing Director Representatives David Marchick House of 7/24/2008 $1,000 Richard Neal Federal Managing Director Representatives William E. Conway, Jr. House of Managing Director & 7/24/2008 $2,300 Richard Neal Federal Representatives Co‐Founder Olivier Sarkozy House of 7/24/2008 $500 Richard Neal Federal Managing Director Representatives Daniel D’Aniello House of Managing Director & 7/24/2008 $2,300 Richard Neal Federal Representatives Co‐Founder Bruce Rosenblum House of 7/30/2008 $2,300 Richard Neal Federal Managing Director Representatives Note: The above disclosure includes all state and local contributions regardless of whether the recipient would be deemed an “Official” or “Public Pension Fund Official,” as defined in the Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct. TCG01042013 Allan Holt House of 7/30/2008 $2,300 Richard Neal Federal Managing Director Representatives Mitch McConnell, Jon Colby 8/4/2008 $500 McConnell Senate Senator Federal Managing Director Committee ‘14 Jeff Ferguson House of 8/26/2008 $1,500 Richard Neal Federal Managing Director Representatives Robert Stuckey Republican National 9/4/2008 $2,500 Federal Managing Director Committee Rodney Cohen Democratic Senatorial 9/11/2008 $10,000 Senate Federal Managing Director Campaign Committee Allan Holt John E. Sununu, Team House of 9/16/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director Sununu Representatives Ray Whiteman Democratic Senatorial 9/17/2008 $5,000 Senator Federal Managing Director Campaign Committee Daniel D’Aniello National Senatorial Managing Director & 9/17/2008 $28,500 Senator Federal Republican Committee Co‐Founder Mary L. Landrieu, Bruce Rosenblum House of 9/17/2008 $2,300 Friends of Mary Federal Managing Director Representatives Landrieu Inc Bruce Rosenblum National Senatorial 9/17/2008 $2,300 Senator Federal Managing Director Republican Committee Allan Holt National Senatorial 9/17/2008 $27,600 Senator Federal Managing Director Republican Committee Note: The above disclosure includes all state and local contributions regardless of whether the recipient would be deemed an “Official” or “Public Pension Fund Official,” as defined in the Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct. TCG01042013 Bruce Rosenblum Kay R. Hagan, Hagan 9/19/2008 $2,300 Senator Federal Managing Director Senate Committee Inc John Harris 9/20/2008 $500 Jim Slatter Senator Federal Senior Advisor Bruce Rosenblum Jeffrey Alan Merkley, House of 9/20/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director Jeff Merkley for Oregon Representatives Leo Helmers Democratic Senatorial 9/22/2008 $3,000 Senator Federal Managing Director Campaign Committee William E. Conway, Jr. Democratic Senatorial Managing Director & 9/22/2008 $28,500 Senator Federal Campaign Committee Co‐Founder Bruce Rosenblum Mark Begich, Alaskans House of 9/22/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director for Begich Representatives Lindsey Graham, Allan Holt 9/22/2008 $2,300 Lindsey Graham for Senator Federal Managing Director Senate Peter Clare Democratic Senatorial 9/22/2008 $5,000 Senator Federal Managing Director Campaign Committee Olivier Sarkozy Democratic Senatorial 9/23/2008 $1,500 Senator Federal Managing Director Campaign Committee John Cornyn, Texans for Allan Holt 9/24/2008 $2,300 Senator John Cornyn Senator Federal Managing Director Inc. Allan Holt Robert W. Schaffer, Bob 9/24/2008 $2,300 Senator Federal Managing Director Schaffer for US Senate Note: The above disclosure includes all state and local contributions regardless of whether the recipient would be deemed an “Official” or “Public Pension Fund Official,” as defined in the Public Pension Fund Reform Code of Conduct. TCG01042013 David Marchick House of 9/25/2008 $500 Joseph Crowley Federal Managing Director Representatives Lamar Alexander, Allan Holt 9/25/2008 $2,300 Alexander for Senate Senator Federal Managing Director 2014 Inc. Allan Holt Roger F. Wicker, Wicker 9/26/2008 $2,300 Senator Federal Managing Director for Senate Allan Holt Susan M. Collins, 9/26/2008 $2,300 Senator Federal Managing Director Collins for Senator Brooke Coburn Democratic Senatorial 9/28/2008 $1,500 Senator Federal Managing Director Campaign Committee Glenn Youngkin Mark Elmore, Mark House of 10/1/2008 $500 Federal Managing Director Elmore for Congress Representatives Bruce Rosenblum John E. Sununu, Team House of 10/1/2008 $2,300 Federal Managing Director Sununu Representatives John Neely Kennedy, Allan Holt 10/2/2008 $2,300 John Kennedy for US Senator Federal Managing Director Senate Inc. DNC Services Ray
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mcconnell Announces Senate Republican Committee Assignments for the 117Th Congress
    For Immediate Release, Wednesday, February 3, 2021 Contacts: David Popp, Doug Andres Robert Steurer, Stephanie Penn McConnell Announces Senate Republican Committee Assignments for the 117th Congress Praises Senators Crapo and Tim Scott for their work on the Committee on Committees WASHINGTON, D.C. – Following the 50-50 power-sharing agreement finalized earlier today, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced the Senate Republican Conference Committee Assignments for the 117th Congress. Leader McConnell once again selected Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID) to chair the Senate Republicans’ Committee on Committees, the panel responsible for committee assignments for the 117th Congress. This is the ninth consecutive Congress in which Senate leadership has asked Crapo to lead this important task among Senate Republicans. Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) assisted in the committee selection process as he did in the previous three Congresses. “I want to thank Mike and Tim for their work. They have both earned the trust of our colleagues in the Republican Conference by effectively leading these important negotiations in years past and this year was no different. Their trust and experience was especially important as we enter a power-sharing agreement with Democrats and prepare for equal representation on committees,” McConnell said. “I am very grateful for their work.” “I appreciate Leader McConnell’s continued trust in having me lead the important work of the Committee on Committees,” said Senator Crapo. “Americans elected an evenly-split Senate, and working together to achieve policy solutions will be critical in continuing to advance meaningful legislation impacting all Americans. Before the COVID-19 pandemic hit our nation, our economy was the strongest it has ever been.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Know the Candidates
    C M Y K C12 DAILY 01-29-08 MD RE C12 CMYK C12 Tuesday, January 29, 2008 R The Washington Post Last week’s survey Bee 10.4% asked: What is your Butterfly 35.1% favorite insect? Cockroach 8.4% More than 450 SAYS readers Ladybug 21.8% SURVEY responded: I don’t like bugs! 24.3% WEATHER has traveled around to be studied TODAY’S NEWS by paleontologists, the U.S. space SPEAK OUT agency and the National Geo- Hadrosaur’s Roaming graphic Society. THIS WEEK’S TOPIC Unlike most collections of Days Are Almost Over bones found in museums, this K Dakota the duckbilled dinosaur hadrosaur was found with fossil- Super Bowl Pick is going home to North Dakota. ized skin, ligaments, tendons and BY DIANE BONDAREFF — RUBIN MUSEUM OF ART VIA AP The New York Giants and the The 65-million-year-old fossil- possibly some internal organs, re- Wim Hof is head and shoulders above TODAY: Cloudy; New England Patriots meet other ice-bath record seekers. ized hadrosaur, found in North searchers said. rain likely. Sunday in Super Bowl XLII Dakota’s Badlands in 1999, will It was found by a high school (42). The Patriots have 18 wins be ready for display at the State student who spotted its bony tail Cold? Think Again HIGH LOW and no losses this season and Historical Society in Bismarck in while hiking on his uncle’s are trying to notch the longest early June. Since the discovery, it ranch. K Most people try to stay out of 50 38 perfect season in pro football the cold during winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Republicans' Mexican-American Presidential Candidate: Mitt Romney?
    Republicans’ Mexican-American Presidential Candidate: Mitt Romney? By Ted J. Chiappari and Angelo A. Paparelli* Four years ago, one of the challenges to President Barack Obama’s Constitutional eligibility for the presidency as a “natural born Citizen” was based on his ostensible dual citizenship at birth and the divided loyalties1 that can result from multiple citizenships. More recently, Mitt Romney’s Mexican heritage made it into the news because of Newt Gingrich’s claim that Romney was “anti- immigrant.”2 Reports of Mitt Romney’s eligibility for Mexican citizenship appeared around the same time.3 With the suspension of Rick Santorum’s presidential campaign and Newt Gingrich’s concession that Mitt Romney will probably be the Republican Party’s 2012 candidate, Romney and Obama are beginning in earnest to highlight their differences. Since both candidates are facing the potential liability of having a father born abroad (George Romney in Mexico and Barack Obama Sr. in Kenya) from whom eligibility for dual citizenship may flow, it is unlikely that either candidate will wish to highlight his opponent’s transnational ties. If they did, as unlikely as it may be, a brief reflection on the issue could result in a new appreciation of the intricacies of the U.S. citizenship laws. In the wake of the last presidential election, we explored the complexities of U.S. citizenship law in connection with the candidacies of both Senator John McCain – born in the Panama Canal Zone – and then President-Elect Obama.4 Given Mitt Romney’s birth in Detroit, no one is questioning that he is a “natural born Citizen” eligible to be President pursuant to Article II of the 1 Competing loyalties have long been a concern in policy and legal arguments against dual citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economist/Yougov Poll
    The Economist/YouGov Poll Sample 2000 General Population Respondents Conducted July 31 - August 4, 2015 Margin of Error ±2.9% 1. Some people seem to follow what’s going on in government and public affairs most of the time, whether there’s an election going on or not. Others aren’t that interested. Would you say you follow what’s going on in government and public affairs ... ? Most of the time . 45% Some of the time . 32% Only now and then . .13% Hardly at all . 9% Don’t know . .1% 2. Would you say things in this country today are... Generally headed in the right direction . 30% Off on the wrong track . 56% Not sure . 14% 3. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Joe Biden 14% 27% 15% 26% 17% Lincoln Chafee 2% 10% 12% 14% 62% Hillary Clinton 21% 23% 10% 39% 7% Martin O’Malley 3% 13% 14% 14% 56% Bernie Sanders 15% 15% 14% 21% 36% Jim Webb 3% 13% 14% 11% 58% 1 The Economist/YouGov Poll 4. Do you have a favorable or an unfavorable opinion of the following people? Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable know Jeb Bush 9% 25% 21% 28% 17% Ben Carson 14% 18% 12% 16% 40% Chris Christie 6% 22% 24% 27% 22% Ted Cruz 11% 20% 14% 26% 29% Carly Fiorina 9% 16% 12% 17% 45% Jim Gilmore 3% 8% 11% 12% 66% Lindsey Graham 4% 16% 19% 22% 39% Mike Huckabee 9% 22% 18% 25% 26% Bobby Jindal 7% 18% 14% 21% 40% John Kasich 6% 14% 13% 13% 53% George Pataki 2% 14% 17% 15% 52% Rand Paul 8% 26% 20% 19% 28% Rick Perry 7% 23% 15% 25% 30% Marco Rubio 11% 23% 15% 21% 30% Rick Santorum 6% 20% 16% 25% 33% Donald Trump 20% 16% 11% 44% 8% Scott Walker 14% 16% 10% 22% 37% 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton Maintains Lead in New Jersey Primary Races
    _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Contact: PATRICK MURRAY This poll was conducted by the 732-263-5858 (office) Monmouth University Polling Institute 732-979-6769 (cell) [email protected] 400 Cedar Avenue West Long Branch, NJ 07764 EMBARGOED to: www.monmouth.edu/polling Sunday, February 3, 2008, 5:00 am McCAIN PULLS AWAY; CLINTON MAINTAINS LEAD IN NEW JERSEY PRIMARY RACES GOP race solidifies; but still some volatility among Democrats With just days to go before Super Tuesday, it looks like the race for New Jersey’s presidential delegates is solidifying. According to the latest Monmouth University/Gannett New Jersey Poll , Hillary Clinton continues to lead Barack Obama – now by 14 points – among likely Democratic voters in New Jersey. On the Republican side, it appears that nearly all of former Rudy Giuliani’s supporters have transferred their affections to John McCain, who now holds a commanding 32 point lead over his nearest rival Mitt Romney. The Democratic race is now down to a two-person contest, 50% of likely Democratic primary voters in New Jersey indicate they will vote for New York senator Hillary Clinton to 36% for Illinois senator Barack Obama. Another 14% remain undecided. Former North Carolina senator John Edward’s departure from the race does not seem to have benefited one candidate over the other. On the other hand, former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani’s withdrawal from the GOP race after his third-place finish in Florida has been a boon for Arizona senator John McCain. McCain now leads the four-man field in New Jersey with 55% of likely primary voters, to 23% for former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, 7% for former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, and 3% for Texas congressman Ron Paul.
    [Show full text]
  • Ref. BOR-12H, Page 1 of 19 U.S
    Harry Reid Harry Mason Reid (/riːd/; born December 2, 1939) is a retired Harry Reid American attorney and politician who served as a United States Senator from Nevada from 1987 to 2017. He led the Senate's Democratic Conference from 2005 to 2017 and was the Senate Majority Leader from 2007 to 2015. Reid began his public career as the city attorney for Henderson, Nevada before winning election to the Nevada Assembly in 1968. Reid's former boxing coach, Mike O'Callaghan, chose Reid as his running mate in the 1970 Nevada gubernatorial election, and Reid served as Lieutenant Governor of Nevada from 1971 to 1975. After being defeated in races for the United States Senate and the position of mayor of Las Vegas, Reid served as chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission from 1977 to 1981. From 1983 to 1987, Reid represented Nevada's 1st district in the United States House of Representatives. Senate Majority Leader Reid won election to the United States Senate in 1986 and served in In office the Senate from 1987 to 2017. He served as the Senate Democratic January 3, 2007 – January 3, 2015 Whip from 1999 to 2005 before succeeding Tom Daschle as Senate Deputy Dick Durbin Minority Leader. The Democrats won control of the Senate after the 2006 United States Senate elections, and Reid became the Preceded by Bill Frist Senate Majority Leader in 2007. He held that position for the last Succeeded by Mitch McConnell two years of George W. Bush's presidency and the first six years of Senate Minority Leader Barack Obama's presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Inserting Peer Review in the American Presidential Nomination Process
    Effective Public Management APRIL 2017 Re-inserting peer review in the American presidential nomination process Elaine C. Kamarck INTRODUCTION ost Americans today view the ability to participate in a primary election for the nominee of a political party as a “right” akin to the basic right to vote in the presidential election Mitself. No one alive today can remember an era when presidential primaries did not exist, and very few living Americans can remember when primaries were only one part of the nominating process—and usually an unimportant one at that. Elaine C. Kamarck is a Senior Fellow in the Governance Studies Most Americans would be surprised to know that one of our great presidents was nominated by a program as well as the Director of the Center small cabal of Congressmen before he went on to win the 1800 election. That would be Thomas for Effective Public Jefferson. Or that another famous president was nominated by a convention consisting of 1,154 Management at the Brookings Institution. “superdelegates” before he went on to win the 1932 election. That would be Franklin Delano She is a member of the Democratic National Roosevelt. Or that another famous president insisted that he would not seek the Republican nomi- Committee’s Unity nation but was drafted by his party’s leaders anyway and won the 1952 election. That would be Reform Commission and has served as a Dwight D. Eisenhower. superdelegate in the last five presidential elections. For most of American history, ordinary citizens not only did not participate in the nomination process, they did not expect to participate.
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL March 2016 Florida GOP Primary Study
    Suffolk University Florida Likely Republican Voters FINAL March 2016 Florida GOP Primary Study GeoCode (N=500) n % North --------------------------------------------------------------- 128 25.60 South ----------------------------------------------------------------- 98 19.60 East ---------------------------------------------------------------- 127 25.40 West ---------------------------------------------------------------- 147 29.40 *********************************************************************************************************** Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. Would you be willing to spend five minutes answering some questions? 1. Gender {BY OBSERVATION} (N=500) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 253 50.60 Female ------------------------------------------------------------ 247 49.40 2. How likely are you to vote in the Republican Presidential Primary next week – very likely, somewhat likely, 50-50, not very likely, not at all likely, or have you already voted? (N=500) n % Very likely --------------------------------------------------------- 451 90.20 Already voted ------------------------------------------------------ 49 9.80 3. Are you currently registered as a Democrat, Republican, Independent, something else or are you not registered to vote? (N=500) n % Republican ------------------------------------------------------- 500 100.00 4. What is your age category? (N=500) n %
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Presidential Eligibility
    Fordham Law Review Volume 85 Issue 3 Article 5 2016 Rethinking Presidential Eligibility Eugene D. Mazo George Mason University Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Election Law Commons, Law and Society Commons, President/Executive Department Commons, and the Public Law and Legal Theory Commons Recommended Citation Eugene D. Mazo, Rethinking Presidential Eligibility, 85 Fordham L. Rev. 1045 (2016). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol85/iss3/5 This Colloquium is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RETHINKING PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY Eugene D. Mazo* Many aspiring American Presidents have had their candidacies challenged for failing to meet the Constitution’s eligibility requirements. Although none of these challenges have ever been successful, they have sapped campaigns of valuable resources and posed a threat to several ambitious men. This Article examines several notable presidential eligibility challenges and explains why they have often been unsuccessful. The literature on presidential eligibility traditionally has focused on the Eligibility Clause, which enumerates the age, residency, and citizenship requirements that a President must satisfy before taking office. By contrast, very little of it examines how a challenge to one’s candidacy impacts a presidential campaign. This Article seeks to fill this gap. It also offers a modest proposal: Congress should pass legislation defining exactly who is eligible to be President and also implement procedural rules that would expedite presidential eligibility cases for review to the Supreme Court.
    [Show full text]
  • State Delegations
    STATE DELEGATIONS Number before names designates Congressional district. Senate Republicans in roman; Senate Democrats in italic; Senate Independents in SMALL CAPS; House Democrats in roman; House Republicans in italic; House Libertarians in SMALL CAPS; Resident Commissioner and Delegates in boldface. ALABAMA SENATORS 3. Mike Rogers Richard C. Shelby 4. Robert B. Aderholt Doug Jones 5. Mo Brooks REPRESENTATIVES 6. Gary J. Palmer [Democrat 1, Republicans 6] 7. Terri A. Sewell 1. Bradley Byrne 2. Martha Roby ALASKA SENATORS REPRESENTATIVE Lisa Murkowski [Republican 1] Dan Sullivan At Large – Don Young ARIZONA SENATORS 3. Rau´l M. Grijalva Kyrsten Sinema 4. Paul A. Gosar Martha McSally 5. Andy Biggs REPRESENTATIVES 6. David Schweikert [Democrats 5, Republicans 4] 7. Ruben Gallego 1. Tom O’Halleran 8. Debbie Lesko 2. Ann Kirkpatrick 9. Greg Stanton ARKANSAS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES John Boozman [Republicans 4] Tom Cotton 1. Eric A. ‘‘Rick’’ Crawford 2. J. French Hill 3. Steve Womack 4. Bruce Westerman CALIFORNIA SENATORS 1. Doug LaMalfa Dianne Feinstein 2. Jared Huffman Kamala D. Harris 3. John Garamendi 4. Tom McClintock REPRESENTATIVES 5. Mike Thompson [Democrats 45, Republicans 7, 6. Doris O. Matsui Vacant 1] 7. Ami Bera 309 310 Congressional Directory 8. Paul Cook 31. Pete Aguilar 9. Jerry McNerney 32. Grace F. Napolitano 10. Josh Harder 33. Ted Lieu 11. Mark DeSaulnier 34. Jimmy Gomez 12. Nancy Pelosi 35. Norma J. Torres 13. Barbara Lee 36. Raul Ruiz 14. Jackie Speier 37. Karen Bass 15. Eric Swalwell 38. Linda T. Sa´nchez 16. Jim Costa 39. Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr. 17. Ro Khanna 40. Lucille Roybal-Allard 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Palin the Entertainer Vs
    Sarah Palin the Entertainer vs. Sarah Palin the Politician Lincoln Mitchell, Harriman Institute, Columbia University Posted: 06/ 7/11 10:26 AM ET In recent days most of the energy in the Republican nominating contest has been take up by Sarah Palin's bus tour. Palin, who moves more seamlessly between entertainment and politics than any politician in recent memory, may, like her erstwhile New York City pizza companion, Donald Trump, soon realize that running for president is likely to be an unsuccessful and not particularly lucrative endeavor. For now, however, she has become the main story in the GOP primary, disrupting Mitt Romney's official announcement, drawing attention away from Herman Cain's recent rise in the polls, and reducing Rick Santorum's announcement of his intentions to seek the Republican nomination to a non- story for all but the most devoted followers of Dan Savage. There have, of course, been politicians who have moved between entertainment and politics in the past. Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sonny Bono, for example, were all extremely successful entertainers before moving into politics. For these three men, the film or music industry was their first career, out of which they transitioned before running for office. Once in office, they all focused their attention on being president, governor or congressman, not on the next move as entertainers. Palin is different. For her the line between entertainment and politics is so vague that it is legitimately difficult to know whether she is beginning a run for the White House or simply seeking to keep her name in the spotlight as other candidates begin to vie for the right wing voters with whom she is so popular.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for a Disputed Presidential Election: an Exercise in Election Risk Assessment and Management
    Preparing for a Disputed Presidential Election: An Exercise in Election Risk Assessment and Management Edward B. Foley* This Article considers the possibility that a major dispute over the outcome of the 2020 presidential election could arise, even without foreign interference or some other extraordinary event, but rather just from the ordinary process of counting ballots. Building upon previous research on the “blue shift” phenomenon, whereby adjustments in vote tallies during the canvassing of returns tends to advantage Democratic candidates, it is easy to imagine a dispute arising if this kind of “blue shift” were consequential in the presidential race. Using examples from both Pennsylvania and Arizona, two states susceptible to significant “blue shifts” in previous elections, the article shows how the dispute could reach Congress, where it potentially might metastasize into a full-fledged constitutional crisis. The most frightening scenario is where the dispute remains unresolved on January 20, 2021, the date for the inauguration of the new presidential term, and the military is uncertain as to who is entitled to receive the nuclear codes as commander-in-chief. In order to avoid this risk, Congress should amend the relevant statute, 3 U.S.C. § 15. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 310 I. FROM NOVEMBER 3, 2020 THROUGH DECEMBER 14, 2020 ....... 315 A. What Could Happen ..................................................... 315 B. Analysis .......................................................................
    [Show full text]