Measuring the Masses of Neutron Stars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Measuring the Masses of Neutron Stars Reports from Observers Measuring the Masses of Neutron Stars Lex Kaper1 Arjen van der Meer1 Marten van Kerkwijk Ed van den Heuvel1 Visualisation: B. Pounds 1 Astronomical Institute “Anton Panne- koek” and Centre for High Energy Astrophysics, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Department of Astronomy and Astro- physics, University of Toronto, Canada Until a few years ago the common un- derstanding was that neutron stars, the compact remnants of massive stars, have a canonical mass of about 1.4 MA. Recent observations with VLT/UVES support the view that the neutron stars in high-mass X-ray binaries display a relatively large spread in mass, ranging from the theoretical lower mass limit Figure 1: Artist’s impression of a high-mass X-ray of 1 MA up to over 2 MA. Such a mass ter of such a high density. As bosons do distribution provides important informa- not contribute to the fermi pressure1, their binary hosting a massive OB-type star and a compact X-ray source, a neutron star or a black tion on the formation mechanism of presence will tend to ‘soften’ the EOS. hole. neutron stars (i.e. the supernovae), and For a soft EOS, the maximum neutron star on the (unknown) behaviour of matter at mass will be low (~ 1.5 MA); for a high- 1807 with a mass of .1 ± 0. MA (Nice et supranuclear densities. er mass, the object would collapse into al. 005). These results favour a stiff EOS. a black hole. More than 100 candidate equations of state are proposed, but only A neutron star cannot be more massive The compact remnants of massive stars one EOS can be the correct one. Find- than 3. MA, a limit set by general re- ing one massive neutron star (M ≥ MA) lativity. It is likely that the maximum neu- A neutron star is the compact remnant would rule out the soft equations of state. tron-star mass is determined by the of a massive star (M ≥ 8 MA) with a cen- stiffness of the EOS, and is expected to tral density that can be as high as 5 to The measurement of neutron-star masses be about .5 MA. Neutron stars also 10 times the density of an atomic nucle- is thus important for our understand- have a minimum mass limit. The minimum us. Neutron stars can be detected as ing of the EOS of matter at supranuclear stable neutron-star mass is about 0.1 MA, radio sources (radio pulsars) or, when densities. In practice, this can only be although a more realistic minimum stems they accrete matter coming from a com- done for neutron stars in binary systems. from a neutron star’s origin in a super- panion star in a binary system, as X-ray The most accurate masses have been nova. Lepton-rich proto neutron stars are sources. derived for the binary radio pulsars. Until unbound if their masses are less than recently, all of these were consistent about 1 MA (Lattimer and Prakash 004). The global structure of a neutron star with a small mass range near 1.35 MA Whether or not neutron stars occupy the depends on the equation of state (EOS), (Thorsett and Chakrabarty 1999). An ex- full available mass range depends on the i.e. the relation between pressure ception is the X-ray pulsar Vela X-1 with formation mechanism, i.e. the supernova. and density in the neutron star interior a mass of 1.86 ± 0.16 MA (Barziv et al. (Lattimer and Prakash 004). So far, 001). This important result was obtained We focus here on the initially most mas- the physical properties of matter under following a nine-month spectroscopic sive binary systems, which consist of these extreme conditions can only be monitoring campaign with the ESO Coudé a massive OB-supergiant and a neutron studied on the basis of theoretical mod- Auxiliary Telescope and the CES spec- star (or a black hole). The main motiva- els. It is not yet possible to produce the trograph, covering 36 orbits of the binary tion to concentrate on these systems is required extremely high density in ac- system. Over the past year a few more that they are the most likely hosts of celerator experiments. Given an EOS, a massive neutron stars were discovered, massive neutron stars. About a dozen of mass-radius relation for the neutron e.g. the millisecond radio pulsar J0751+ these systems are known; five of them star and a corresponding maximum neu- tron-star mass can be derived. The 1 The repelling force that neutrons (fermions) exert About 80 % of the HMXBs are Be/X-ray binaries, ‘stiffness’ of the EOS depends e.g. on on each other so that a neutron star can sustain where the (transient) X-ray source accretes material how many bosons are present in mat- gravity. from the equatorial disc around a Be star. The Messenger 126 – December 006 7 Reports from Observers Kaper L. et al., Measuring the Masses of Neutron Stars contain an eclipsing X-ray pulsar. The The compact companion is the remnant spiral-in likely results in the removal of masses of all but one (Vela X-1) are con- of the initially most massive star in the the envelope of the Be companion, and sistent (within their errors) with a value system that exploded as a supernova. after the (second) supernova a bound of about 1.4 MA. However, most spectro- Due to a phase of mass transfer, the sec- (or disrupted) double neutron star re- scopic observations used for these mass ondary became the most massive star in mains, like the Hulse-Taylor binary pulsar determinations were carried out more the system before the primary supernova, PSR 1913+16 (or a neutron star – white than 0 years ago, before the advent of so that the system remained bound. A dwarf system, if the mass of the Be com- sensitive CCD detectors and 8-m-class consequence, however, is that HMXBs panion is less than 8 MA). In HMXBs with telescopes, which allow high-resolution are runaways due to the kick velocity an orbital period less than about a year spectroscopy of the optical companions. exerted by the supernova (Blaauw 1961). the compact object will enter the core of The uncertainties in the earlier radial When they run through space with super- the OB companion which will become velocity measurements are too large to sonic velocity, the interaction of the OB- a Thorne-Zytkow object, a red supergiant measure a significant spread in mass supergiant wind with the interstellar me- with a high mass loss rate. These ob- among these neutron stars, if present. dium can result in the formation of a bow jects have been predicted on evolutionary shock (see also The Messenger 89, 8). grounds, but have so far not been recog- nised as such. High-mass X-ray binaries The HMXB phase is relatively short for OB-supergiant systems, of the order of Table 1 lists the basic properties of the High-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) repre- 10 000 years. This corresponds to the HMXBs with OB-supergiant compan- sent an important phase in the evolution time required for the secondary to evolve ions in the Milky Way and the Magellanic of massive binaries. They are composed into a supergiant when the hydrogen in Clouds. Most sources contain an X-ray of a massive OB-type star and a com- the nucleus has been exhausted. As soon pulsar; the pulse period (i.e. rotation pe- pact object, either a neutron star or a as the secondary has become an OB- riod of the neutron star) is short and the 38 –1 black hole (Figure 1). The X-ray source is supergiant it develops a strong stellar X-ray luminosity high (LX ~ 10 erg s ) powered by accretion of material origi- wind. The accretion of wind material turns in systems undergoing Roche-lobe over- nating from the OB star, transported by the compact object into an observable flow due to the higher mass- and angular- the OB-star wind or by Roche-lobe over- X-ray source. Once the supergiant starts momentum accretion rate. The latter sys- flow. About a dozen HMXBs are known to overflow its Roche lobe, the mass tems also have circular orbits, while to host a massive OB-supergiant com- transfer rate increases further so that an the wind-fed systems have eccentricities panion (about 10 to over 40 MA), in a rela- accretion disc is formed around the com- up to e = 0.45 (GX301-, Kaper et al. 35 tively tight orbit (Porb several days) with pact object, turning it into a very strong 006) and an X-ray luminosity LX ~ 10 – an X-ray pulsar or black-hole companion X-ray source accreting at the Eddington 1036 erg s–1. (Table 1). Some of these X-ray binaries limit. Soon after, the increasing mass include a dense accretion disc and pro- transfer rate causes the system to enter duce relativistic jets. Recently, several a phase of common-envelope evolution Neutron stars versus black holes new sources have been discovered with swamping the X-ray source and finally the ESA gamma- and hard-X-ray observ- causing the compact object to spiral into In Figure the mass distribution of neu- atory INTEGRAL that show the character- the OB-supergiant. tron stars and black holes is shown, istics of a HMXB with an OB-supergiant based on measurements collected from companion hidden by large amounts From this stage on the evolution of the the literature (Stairs 004, McClintock of interstellar dust (e.g.
Recommended publications
  • Negreiros Lecture II
    General Relativity and Neutron Stars - II Rodrigo Negreiros – UFF - Brazil Outline • Compact Stars • Spherically Symmetric • Rotating Compact Stars • Magnetized Compact Stars References for this lecture Compact Stars • Relativistic stars with inner structure • We need to solve Einstein’s equation for the interior as well as the exterior Compact Stars - Spherical • We begin by writing the following metric • Which leads to the following components of the Riemman curvature tensor Compact Stars - Spherical • The Ricci tensor components are calculated as • Ricci scalar is given by Compact Stars - Spherical • Now we can calculate Einstein’s equation as 휇 • Where we used a perfect fluid as sources ( 푇휈 = 푑푖푎푔(휖, 푃, 푃, 푃)) Compact Stars - Spherical • Einstein’s equation define the space-time curvature • We must also enforce energy-momentum conservation • This implies that • Where the four velocity is given by • After some algebra we get Compact Stars - Spherical • Making use of Euler’s equation we get • Thus • Which we can rewrite as Compact Stars - Spherical • Now we introduce • Which allow us to integrate one of Einstein’s equation, leading to • After some shuffling of Einstein’s equation we can write Summary so far... Metric Energy-Momentum Tensor Einstein’s equation Tolmann-Oppenheimer-Volkoff eq. Relativistic Hydrostatic Equilibrium Mass continuity Stellar structure calculation Microscopic Ewuation of State Macroscopic Composition Structure Recapitulando … “Feed” with diferente microscopic models Microscopic Ewuation of State Macroscopic Composition Structure Compare predicted properties with Observed data. Rotating Compact Stars • During its evolution, compact stars may acquire high rotational frequencies (possibly up to 500 hz) • Rotation breaks spherical symmetry, increasing the degrees of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Pulsars
    High-energy astrophysics Explore the PUL SAR menagerie Astronomers are discovering many strange properties of compact stellar objects called pulsars. Here’s how they fit together. by Victoria M. Kaspi f you browse through an astronomy book published 25 years ago, you’d likely assume that astronomers understood extremely dense objects called neutron stars fairly well. The spectacular Crab Nebula’s central body has been a “poster child” for these objects for years. This specific neutron star is a pulsar that I rotates roughly 30 times per second, emitting regular appar- ent pulsations in Earth’s direction through a sort of “light- house” effect as the star rotates. While these textbook descriptions aren’t incorrect, research over roughly the past decade has shown that the picture they portray is fundamentally incomplete. Astrono- mers know that the simple scenario where neutron stars are all born “Crab-like” is not true. Experts in the field could not have imagined the variety of neutron stars they’ve recently observed. We’ve found that bizarre objects repre- sent a significant fraction of the neutron star population. With names like magnetars, anomalous X-ray pulsars, soft gamma repeaters, rotating radio transients, and compact Long the pulsar poster child, central objects, these bodies bear properties radically differ- the Crab Nebula’s central object is a fast-spinning neutron star ent from those of the Crab pulsar. Just how large a fraction that emits jets of radiation at its they represent is still hotly debated, but it’s at least 10 per- magnetic axis. Astronomers cent and maybe even the majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars
    Chandra X-Ray Observatory X-Ray Astronomy Field Guide Neutron Stars Ordinary matter, or the stuff we and everything around us is made of, consists largely of empty space. Even a rock is mostly empty space. This is because matter is made of atoms. An atom is a cloud of electrons orbiting around a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons. The nucleus contains more than 99.9 percent of the mass of an atom, yet it has a diameter of only 1/100,000 that of the electron cloud. The electrons themselves take up little space, but the pattern of their orbit defines the size of the atom, which is therefore 99.9999999999999% Chandra Image of Vela Pulsar open space! (NASA/PSU/G.Pavlov et al. What we perceive as painfully solid when we bump against a rock is really a hurly-burly of electrons moving through empty space so fast that we can't see—or feel—the emptiness. What would matter look like if it weren't empty, if we could crush the electron cloud down to the size of the nucleus? Suppose we could generate a force strong enough to crush all the emptiness out of a rock roughly the size of a football stadium. The rock would be squeezed down to the size of a grain of sand and would still weigh 4 million tons! Such extreme forces occur in nature when the central part of a massive star collapses to form a neutron star. The atoms are crushed completely, and the electrons are jammed inside the protons to form a star composed almost entirely of neutrons.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure Pulsar Multifunction Spectroscopy Service Complete Cased Hole Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Saturation Monitoring from A
    Pulsar Multifunction spectroscopy service Introducing environment-independent, stand-alone cased hole formation evaluation and saturation monitoring 1 APPLICATIONS FEATURES AND BENEFITS ■ Stand-alone formation evaluation for diagnosis of bypassed ■ Environment-independent reservoir saturation monitoring ■ High-performance pulsed neutron generator (PNG) hydrocarbons, depleted reservoirs, and gas zones in any formation water salinity ● Optimized pulsing scheme with multiple square and short ● Differentiation of gas-filled porosity from very low porosity ● Production fluid profile determination for any well pulses for clean separation in measuring both inelastic and formations by using neutron porosity and fast neutron cross inclination: horizontal, deviated, and vertical capture gamma rays 8 section (FNXS) measurements ● Detection of water entry and flow behind casing ● High neutron output of 3.5 × 10 neutron/s for greater ■ measurement precision Petrophysical evaluation with greater accuracy by accounting ● Gravel-pack quality determination by using for grain density and mineral properties in neutron porosity elemental spectroscopy ■ State-of-the-art detectors ■ Total organic carbon (TOC) quantified as the difference ■ Metals for mining exploration ● Near and far detectors: cerium-doped lanthanum bromide between the measured total carbon and inorganic carbon ■ High-resolution determination of reservoir quality (RQ) (LaBr3:Ce) ■ Oil volume from TOC and completion quality (CQ) for formation evaluation ● Deep detector: yttrium aluminum perovskite
    [Show full text]
  • Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop
    Oshkosh Scholar Page 43 Studying Complex Star-Forming Fields: Rosette Nebula and Monoceros Loop Chris Hathaway and Anthony Kuchera, co-authors Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva, Physics and Astronomy, faculty adviser Christopher Hathaway obtained a B.S. in physics in 2007 and is currently pursuing his masters in physics education at UW Oshkosh. He collaborated with Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva on his senior research project and presented their findings at theAmerican Astronomical Society meeting (2008), the Celebration of Scholarship at UW Oshkosh (2009), and the National Conference on Undergraduate Research in La Crosse, Wisconsin (2009). Anthony Kuchera graduated from UW Oshkosh in May 2008 with a B.S. in physics. He collaborated with Dr. Kaltcheva from fall 2006 through graduation. He presented his astronomy-related research at Posters in the Rotunda (2007 and 2008), the Wisconsin Space Conference (2007), the UW System Symposium for Undergraduate Research and Creative Activity (2007 and 2008), and the American Astronomical Society’s 211th meeting (2008). In December 2009 he earned an M.S. in physics from Florida State University where he is currently working toward a Ph.D. in experimental nuclear physics. Dr. Nadia Kaltcheva is a professor of physics and astronomy. She received her Ph.D. from the University of Sofia in Bulgaria. She joined the UW Oshkosh Physics and Astronomy Department in 2001. Her research interests are in the field of stellar photometry and its application to the study of Galactic star-forming fields and the spiral structure of the Milky Way. Abstract An investigation that presents a new analysis of the structure of the Northern Monoceros field was recently completed at the Department of Physics andAstronomy at UW Oshkosh.
    [Show full text]
  • The Star Newsletter
    THE HOT STAR NEWSLETTER ? An electronic publication dedicated to A, B, O, Of, LBV and Wolf-Rayet stars and related phenomena in galaxies ? No. 70 2002 July-August http://www.astro.ugto.mx/∼eenens/hot/ editor: Philippe Eenens http://www.star.ucl.ac.uk/∼hsn/index.html [email protected] ftp://saturn.sron.nl/pub/karelh/uploads/wrbib/ Contents of this newsletter Call for Data . 1 Abstracts of 12 accepted papers . 2 Abstracts of 2 submitted papers . 10 Abstracts of 6 proceedings papers . 11 Jobs .......................................................................13 Meetings ...................................................................14 Call for Data The multiplicity of 9 Sgr G. Rauw and H. Sana Institut d’Astrophysique, Universit´ede Li`ege,All´eedu 6 Aoˆut, BˆatB5c, B-4000 Li`ege(Sart Tilman), Belgium e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] The non-thermal radio emission observed for a number of O and WR stars implies the presence of a small population of relativistic electrons in the winds of these objects. Electrons could be accelerated to relativistic velocities either in the shock region of a colliding wind binary (Eichler & Usov 1993, ApJ 402, 271) or in the shocks due to intrinsic wind instabilities of a single star (Chen & White 1994, Ap&SS 221, 259). Dougherty & Williams (2000, MNRAS 319, 1005) pointed out that 7 out of 9 WR stars with non-thermal radio emission are in fact binary systems. This result clearly supports the colliding wind scenario. In the present issue of the Hot Star Newsletter, we announce the results of a multi-wavelength campaign on the O4 V star 9 Sgr (= HD 164794; see the abstract by Rauw et al.).
    [Show full text]
  • R-Process Elements from Magnetorotational Hypernovae
    r-Process elements from magnetorotational hypernovae D. Yong1,2*, C. Kobayashi3,2, G. S. Da Costa1,2, M. S. Bessell1, A. Chiti4, A. Frebel4, K. Lind5, A. D. Mackey1,2, T. Nordlander1,2, M. Asplund6, A. R. Casey7,2, A. F. Marino8, S. J. Murphy9,1 & B. P. Schmidt1 1Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2611, Australia 2ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), Australia 3Centre for Astrophysics Research, Department of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB, UK 4Department of Physics and Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 5Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 6Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany 7School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia 8Istituto NaZionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico di Arcetri, Largo Enrico Fermi, 5, 50125, Firenze, Italy 9School of Science, The University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia Neutron-star mergers were recently confirmed as sites of rapid-neutron-capture (r-process) nucleosynthesis1–3. However, in Galactic chemical evolution models, neutron-star mergers alone cannot reproduce the observed element abundance patterns of extremely metal-poor stars, which indicates the existence of other sites of r-process nucleosynthesis4–6. These sites may be investigated by studying the element abundance patterns of chemically primitive stars in the halo of the Milky Way, because these objects retain the nucleosynthetic signatures of the earliest generation of stars7–13.
    [Show full text]
  • The Young Stellar Population of IC 1613 III
    A&A 551, A74 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219977 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics The young stellar population of IC 1613 III. New O-type stars unveiled by GTC-OSIRIS,, M. Garcia1,2 and A. Herrero1,2 1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/Vía Láctea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, Avda. Astrofísico Francisco Sánchez, s/n, 38071 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Received 9 July 2012 / Accepted 16 November 2012 ABSTRACT Context. Very low-metallicity massive stars are key to understanding the reionization epoch. Radiation-driven winds, chief agents in the evolution of massive stars, are consequently an important ingredient in our models of the early-Universe. Recent findings hint that the winds of massive stars with poorer metallicity than the SMC may be stronger than predicted by theory. Besides calling the paradigm of radiation-driven winds into question, this result would affect the calculated ionizing radiation and mechanical feedback of massive stars, as well as the role these objects play at different stages of the Universe. Aims. The field needs a systematic study of the winds of a large sample of very metal-poor massive stars. The sampling of spectral types is particularly poor in the very early types. This paper’s goal is to increase the list of known O-type stars in the dwarf irregular galaxy IC 1613, whose metallicity is lower than the SMC’s roughly by a factor 2. Methods. Using the reddening-free Q pseudo-colour, evolutionary masses, and GALEX photometry, we built a list of very likely O-type stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(INTEGRAL 2010)091
    A candidate former companion star to the Magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216 in the massive Galactic cluster Westerlund 1 PoS(INTEGRAL 2010)091 P.J. Kavanagh 1 School of Physical Sciences and NCPST, Dublin City University Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] E.J.A. Meurs School of Cosmic Physics, DIAS, and School of Physical Sciences, DCU Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] L. Norci School of Physical Sciences and NCPST, Dublin City University Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] Besides carrying the distinction of being the most massive young star cluster in our Galaxy, Westerlund 1 contains the notable Magnetar CXOU J164710.2-455216. While this is the only collapsed stellar remnant known for this cluster, a further ~10² Supernovae may have occurred on the basis of the cluster Initial Mass Function, possibly all leaving Black Holes. We identify a candidate former companion to the Magnetar in view of its high proper motion directed away from the Magnetar region, viz. the Luminous Blue Variable W243. We discuss the properties of W243 and how they pertain to the former Magnetar companion hypothesis. Binary evolution arguments are employed to derive a progenitor mass for the Magnetar of 24-25 M Sun , just within the progenitor mass range for Neutron Star birth. We also draw attention to another candidate to be member of a former massive binary. 8th INTEGRAL Workshop “The Restless Gamma-ray Universe” Dublin, Ireland September 27-30, 2010 1 Speaker Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Article in PDF Format
    A&A 601, A29 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629685 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics Delay-time distribution of core-collapse supernovae with late events resulting from binary interaction E. Zapartas1, S. E. de Mink1, R. G. Izzard2, S.-C. Yoon3, C. Badenes4, Y. Götberg1, A. de Koter1; 5, C. J. Neijssel1, M. Renzo1, A. Schootemeijer6, and T. S. Shrotriya6 1 Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: [E.Zapartas;S.E.deMink]@uva.nl 2 Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 3 Astronomy Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, 151–747 Seoul, Korea 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy & Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Center (PITT-PACC), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA 5 Institute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, 3001 Leuven, Belgium 6 Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany Received 11 September 2016 / Accepted 1 January 2017 ABSTRACT Most massive stars, the progenitors of core-collapse supernovae, are in close binary systems and may interact with their companion through mass transfer or merging. We undertake a population synthesis study to compute the delay-time distribution of core-collapse supernovae, that is, the supernova rate versus time following a starburst, taking into account binary interactions. We test the systematic robustness of our results by running various simulations to account for the uncertainties in our standard assumptions. We find that +9 a significant fraction, 15−8%, of core-collapse supernovae are “late”, that is, they occur 50–200 Myr after birth, when all massive single stars have already exploded.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotating Wolf-Rayet Stars in a Post RSG/LBV Phase an Evolutionary Channel Towards Long-Duration Grbs?
    A&A 547, A83 (2012) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118664 & c ESO 2012 Astrophysics Rotating Wolf-Rayet stars in a post RSG/LBV phase An evolutionary channel towards long-duration GRBs? G. Gräfener1,J.S.Vink1, T. J. Harries2, and N. Langer3 1 Armagh Observatory, College Hill, Armagh BT61 9DG, UK 2 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Exeter, Stocker Rd, Exeter EX4 4QL, UK 3 Argelander-Institut für Astronomie der Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, Germany Received 16 December 2011 / Accepted 3 October 2012 ABSTRACT Context. Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars with fast rotating cores are thought to be the direct progenitors of long-duration gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs). A well accepted evolutionary channel towards LGRBs is chemically-homogeneous evolution at low metallicities, which completely avoids a red supergiant (RSG), or luminous blue variable (LBV) phase. On the other hand, strong absorption features with velocities of several hundred km s−1 have been found in some LGRB afterglow spectra (GRB 020813 and GRB 021004), which have been attributed to dense circumstellar (CS) material that has been ejected in a previous RSG or LBV phase, and is interacting with a fast WR-type stellar wind. Aims. Here we investigate the properties of Galactic WR stars and their environment to identify similar evolutionary channels that may lead to the formation of LGRBs. Methods. We compile available information on the spectropolarimetric properties of 29 WR stars, the presence of CS ejecta for 172 WR stars, and the CS velocities in the environment of 34 WR stars in the Galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3 - Minimum Mass Model of Solar Nebula
    Lecture 3 - Minimum mass model of solar nebula o Topics to be covered: o Composition and condensation o Surface density profile o Minimum mass of solar nebula PY4A01 Solar System Science Minimum Mass Solar Nebula (MMSN) o MMSN is not a nebula, but a protoplanetary disc. Protoplanetary disk Nebula o Gives minimum mass of solid material to build the 8 planets. PY4A01 Solar System Science Minimum mass of the solar nebula o Can make approximation of minimum amount of solar nebula material that must have been present to form planets. Know: 1. Current masses, composition, location and radii of the planets. 2. Cosmic elemental abundances. 3. Condensation temperatures of material. o Given % of material that condenses, can calculate minimum mass of original nebula from which the planets formed. • Figure from Page 115 of “Physics & Chemistry of the Solar System” by Lewis o Steps 1-8: metals & rock, steps 9-13: ices PY4A01 Solar System Science Nebula composition o Assume solar/cosmic abundances: Representative Main nebular Fraction of elements Low-T material nebular mass H, He Gas 98.4 % H2, He C, N, O Volatiles (ices) 1.2 % H2O, CH4, NH3 Si, Mg, Fe Refractories 0.3 % (metals, silicates) PY4A01 Solar System Science Minimum mass for terrestrial planets o Mercury:~5.43 g cm-3 => complete condensation of Fe (~0.285% Mnebula). 0.285% Mnebula = 100 % Mmercury => Mnebula = (100/ 0.285) Mmercury = 350 Mmercury o Venus: ~5.24 g cm-3 => condensation from Fe and silicates (~0.37% Mnebula). =>(100% / 0.37% ) Mvenus = 270 Mvenus o Earth/Mars: 0.43% of material condensed at cooler temperatures.
    [Show full text]