DOCSLIB.ORG

7.1 Birth Defects Code List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7.1 Birth Defects Code List 7.1 BIRTH DEFECTS CODE LIST Based on the British Pediatric Association (BPA) Classification of Diseases (1979) and the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) (1979) Code modifications developed by Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Public Health Service U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Atlanta, Georgia 30333 and Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch Epidemiology and Disease Surveillance Unit Texas Department of State Health Services 1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756 Revised July 31, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction To Birth Defect Diagnosis Coding ................................................................................................. 7 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 BPA coding system .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Description of the BPA code ............................................................................................................................ 8 Problems with the BPA coding system ............................................................................................................ 8 Instructions .......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Inclusion status .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Description of the birth defect ........................................................................................................................ 13 Coding the birth defect ................................................................................................................................... 14 Laterality ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Possible/Probable .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Congenital Anomalies ......................................................................................................................................... 15 740 Anencephalus and Similar Anomalies ............................................................................................... 15 740.0 Anencephalus .................................................................................................................................. 15 740.1 Craniorachischisis ........................................................................................................................... 15 740.2 Iniencephaly..................................................................................................................................... 15 741 Spina Bifida ........................................................................................................................................... 15 741.0 Spina Bifida with hydrocephalus ..................................................................................................... 15 741.9 Spina bifida without mention of hydrocephalus ............................................................................... 16 742 Other Congenital Anomalies of Nervous System .............................................................................. 17 742.0 Encephalocele- ................................................................................................................................ 17 742.1 Microcephalus ................................................................................................................................. 17 742.2 Reduction deformities of brain ......................................................................................................... 17 742.3 Congenital hydrocephalus ............................................................................................................... 18 742.4 Other specified anomalies of brain .................................................................................................. 18 742.5 Other specified anomalies of spinal cord ........................................................................................ 19 742.8 Other specified anomalies of nervous system ................................................................................ 19 742.9 Unspecified anomalies of brain, spinal cord and nervous systems ................................................ 20 743 Congenital Anomalies of Eye .............................................................................................................. 20 743.0 Anophthalmos .................................................................................................................................. 20 743.1 Microphthalmos ............................................................................................................................... 20 743.2 Buphthalmos .................................................................................................................................... 20 743.3 Congenital cataract and lens anomalies ......................................................................................... 20 743.4 Coloboma and other anomalies of anterior segments .................................................................... 21 743.5 Congenital anomalies of posterior segment .................................................................................... 21 743.6 Congenital anomalies of eyelids, lacrimal system, and orbit .......................................................... 21 743.8 Other specified anomalies of eye .................................................................................................... 22 743.9 Unspecified anomalies of eye ......................................................................................................... 23 744 Congenital Anomalies of Ear, Face, and Neck .................................................................................. 23 744.0 Anomalies of ear causing impairment of hearing ............................................................................ 23 744.1 Accessory auricle ............................................................................................................................ 23 744.2 Other specified anomalies of ear ..................................................................................................... 23 744.3 Unspecified anomalies of ear .......................................................................................................... 24 744.4 Branchial cleft, cyst, or fistula; preauricular sinus ........................................................................... 24 2 Rev. 7/31/2019 744.5 Webbing of neck .............................................................................................................................. 25 744.8 Other specified anomalies of face and neck ................................................................................... 25 744.9 Unspecified anomalies of face and neck ......................................................................................... 25 745 Bulbus Cordis Anomalies and Anomalies of Cardiac Septal Closure ............................................ 26 745.0 Common truncus (See 747.200 for pseudotruncus) ....................................................................... 26 745.1 Transposition of great vessels ......................................................................................................... 26 745.2 Tetralogy of Fallot ............................................................................................................................ 27 745.3 Single ventricle ................................................................................................................................ 27 745.4 Ventricular septal defect .................................................................................................................. 27 745.5 Ostium secundum type atrial septal defect ..................................................................................... 27 745.6 Endocardial cushion defects ........................................................................................................... 28 745.7 Cor biloculare .................................................................................................................................. 28 745.8 Other specified defects of septal closure ........................................................................................ 28 745.9 Unspecified defect of septal closure ................................................................................................ 29 746 Other Congenital Anomalies of Heart ................................................................................................. 29 746.0 Anomalies of pulmonary valve........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mimics, Miscalls, and Misses in Pancreatic Disease Koenraad J
    Mimics, Miscalls, and Misses in Pancreatic Disease Koenraad J. Mortelé1 The radiologist plays a pivotal role in the detection and This chapter will summarize, review, and illustrate the characterization of pancreatic disorders. Unfortunately, the most common and important mimics, miscalls, and misses in accuracy of rendered diagnoses is not infrequently plagued by pancreatic imaging and thereby improve diagnostic accuracy a combination of “overcalls” of normal pancreatic anomalies of diagnoses rendered when interpreting radiologic studies of and variants; “miscalls” of specific and sometimes pathog- the pancreas. nomonic pancreatic entities; and “misses” of subtle, uncom- mon, or inadequately imaged pancreatic abnormalities. Ba- Normal Pancreatic Anatomy sic understanding of the normal and variant anatomy of the The Gland pancreas, knowledge of state-of-the-art pancreatic imaging The coarsely lobulated pancreas, typically measuring ap- techniques, and familiarity with the most commonly made mis- proximately 15–20 cm in length, is located in the retroperito- diagnoses and misses in pancreatic imaging is mandatory to neal anterior pararenal space and can be divided in four parts: avoid this group of errors. head and uncinate process, neck, body, and tail [4]. The head, neck, and body are retroperitoneal in location whereas the Mimics of pancreatic disease, caused by developmental tail extends into the peritoneal space. The pancreatic head is variants and anomalies, are commonly encountered on imag- defined as being to the right of the superior mesenteric vein ing studies [1–3]. To differentiate these benign “nontouch” en- (SMV). The uncinate process is the prolongation of the medi- tities from true pancreatic conditions, radiologists should be al and caudal parts of the head; it has a triangular shape with a familiar with them, the imaging techniques available to study straight or concave anteromedial border.
    [Show full text]
  • 446 NQF #0773: Operative Mortality Stratified by the Five STS-EACTS Mortality Categories
    Measure #446 (NQF 0733): Operative Mortality Stratified by the Five STS-EACTS Mortality Categories – National Quality Strategy Domain: Patient Safety 2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY MEASURE TYPE: Outcome DESCRIPTION: Percent of patients undergoing index pediatric and/or congenital heart surgery who die, including both 1) all deaths occurring during the hospitalization in which the procedure was performed, even if after 30 days (including patients transferred to other acute care facilities), and 2) those deaths occurring after discharge from the hospital, but within 30 days of the procedure, stratified by the five STAT Mortality Levels, a multi-institutional validated complexity stratification tool INSTRUCTIONS: This measure is to be reported for all pediatric and/or congenital heart patients each time a surgery is performed during the performance period. This measure is intended to reflect the quality of services provided for patients with congenital heart disease. This measure may be reported by eligible clinicians who perform the quality actions described in the measure based on the services provided and the measure-specific denominator coding. Measure Reporting: The listed denominator criteria is used to identify the intended patient population. The numerator quality-data codes included in this specification are used to submit the quality actions allowed by the measure. All measure-specific coding should be reported on the claim(s) representing the eligible encounter. THERE ARE TWO REPORTING CRITERIA FOR THIS MEASURE:
    [Show full text]
  • Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita
    American Research Journal of Pediatrics Volume 2, Issue 1, pp: 1-5 Research Article Open Access Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita – Case Report Faton Krasniqi1, Shpetim Salihu1, Isabere Krasniqi3, Edmond Pistulli2* 1University Clinical Center of Kosova- Neonatology Clinic, Prishtina 2Faculty of Technical Medical Sciences, University of Medicine, Tirana-Albania 3Main Head Family Center, Prishtina-Kosovo *[email protected] Abstract: Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita is a rare disorder that accompanies with multiple joint been reported from Asia, Africa and Europe. Incidence is about 1:3000 to 1:10.000 of all live newborns. The contractures, which can occur at delivery and are non progressive. It affects both sexes. Most of the cases have causes, for now are unknown. However, this disorder can be provoked from neuropathic and myopathic diseases or some another cause that decreases the mobility of fetal joints. Great joints of both extremities are more attacked. The muscles of the extremities that are attacked can be hypoplastic. Also, the IQ of these children multiplex congenita, that has been resuscitated in delivery room and endotracheal intubation was needed. can be affected. We have presented a newborn female, born in term, by normal delivery, with arthrogryposis In utero, there has been a suspicion from the gynecologists at the end of pregnancy, for esophageal atresia. After delivery, all the needed consults and examinations have been realized. After three weeks in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, the baby has been discharged in a better general condition, with recommendations to further consultations with orthopedics, physiatrician and pediatrician-neurologists. Key words: arthrogryposis, multiple contractures of joints, congenital defect Introduction Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita refers to a heterogeneous group of congenital defects that manifests with multiple joint contractures (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Situs Inversus Totalis with Aortopulmonary Shunt: a Case Report in an Ethiopian
    Ethiop. J. Health Biomed Sci., 2009. Vol.2, No.1 CASE REPORT SITUS INVERSUS TOTALIS WITH AORTOPULMONARY SHUNT: A CASE REPORT IN AN ETHIOPIAN Ermias Diro1 SUMMARY I report a patient who presented with long standing dyspnea without physical signs of congestive heart failure and finally diag- nosed to have situs inversus totalis with aortopulmonary window. Situs inversus totalis refers to a mirror image reversal of the normal position of the internal organs. The recognition of concomitant congenital anomalies such as in the heart or other or- gans is extremely important as it may disturb surgical procedures for concomitant diseases. This is a very rare condition and a coexisting aortopulmonary window was not described before to the best of my knowledge. their normal positions. Situs inversus with dextrocar- dia is termed situs inversus totalis because the car- INTRODUCTION diac position as well as the atrial chambers and ab- dominal viscera are mirror images of the normal anatomy (3). The purpose of this case report is to describe and discuss a rare situation with an important clinical Typically, patients with situs inversus have a normal significance. life expectancy except in the rare instances of cardiac anomalies, depending on the severity of the defect. Situs describes the position of the cardiac atria and Patients with Kartagners syndrome, a triad of situs viscera. Situs solitus is the normal position, and situs inversus, sinusitis and bronchiectasis, have a normal inversus is the mirror image of situs solitus. Cardiac life expectancy if the bronchiectasis is treated ade- situs is determined by the atrial location. In situs in- quately.
    [Show full text]
  • Complications of Splenectomy 2020; 4(2): 218-222 Received: 08-02-2020 Dr
    International Journal of Surgery Science 2020; 4(2): 218-222 E-ISSN: 2616-3470 P-ISSN: 2616-3462 © Surgery Science Complications of splenectomy www.surgeryscience.com 2020; 4(2): 218-222 Received: 08-02-2020 Dr. Ketan Vagholkar Accepted: 10-03-2020 Dr. Ketan Vagholkar DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2020.v4.i2d.420 Professor, Department of Surgery. DY Patil University School of Abstract Medicine Navi Mumbai, Spleen is an important organ of the reticuloendothelial system. It plays a crucial role in the immunological Maharashtra, India system of the body. Understanding the consequences and diagnosis of hyposlenic and asplenic states is essential. Splenectomy is performed for a variety of indications ranging from haematological conditions to trauma. Complications of splenectomy include surgical as well as immunological. Overwhelming post splenectomy infection is one of the most dreaded complication with high mortality. The physiological basis of immunological function of the spleen, hyposplenism and complications of splenectomy are presented in this paper. Keywords: Post splenectomy, complications, hyposplenia, OPSI Introduction Spleen is a very important constituent organ of the reticuloendothelial system. The organ is crucial in regulating immune homeostasis through its ability to link innate and adoptive immunity in the process of protecting against infection. Hyposplenism is impairment of splenic function. It is usually acquired and caused by severe haematological and immunological disorders. Asplenia refers to the absence of the spleen which is rarely congenital but predominantly post-surgical (splenectomy). The most important complication of asplenic state is infectious complications [1]. These infections have high mortality. In addition to infectious complications, splenectomy can lead to a series of other complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging Pearls of the Annular Pancreas on Antenatal Scan and Its
    Imaging pearls of the annular pancreas on antenatal scan and its diagnostic Case Report dilemma: A case report © 2020, Roul et al Pradeep Kumar Roul,1 Ashish Kaushik,1 Manish Kumar Gupta,2 Poonam Sherwani,1 * Submitted: 22-08-2020 Accepted: 10-09-2020 1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh 2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Correspondence*: Dr. Poonam Sherwani. DNB, EDIR, Fellow Pediatric Radiology, Department of International License. Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, E-mail: [email protected] DOI: https://doi.org/10.47338/jns.v9.669 KEYWORDS ABSTRACT Annular pancreas, Background: Annular pancreas is an uncommon cause of duodenal obstruction and rarely Duodenal obstruction, causes complete duodenal obstruction. Due to its rarity of identification in the antenatal Double bubble sign, period and overlapping imaging features with other causes of duodenal obstruction; it is Hyperechogenic band often misdiagnosed. Case presentation: A 33-year-old primigravida came for routine antenatal ultrasonography at 28 weeks and 4 days of gestational age. On antenatal ultrasonography, dilated duodenum and stomach were seen giving a double bubble sign and a hyperechoic band surrounding the duodenum. Associated polyhydramnios was also present. Fetal MRI was also done. Postpartum ultrasonography demonstrated pancreatic tissue surrounding the duodenum. The upper gastrointestinal contrast study showed a non-passage of contrast beyond the second part of the duodenum. Due to symptoms of obstruction, the neonate was operated on, and the underlying cause was found to be the annular pancreas.
    [Show full text]
  • And Pancreas Divisum
    Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.27.2.203 on 1 February 1986. Downloaded from Gut 1986, 27, 203-212 Progress report A historical perspective on the discovery of the accessory duct of the pancreas, the ampulla 'of Vater' andpancreas divisum SUMMARY The discovery of the accessory duct of the pancreas is usually ascribed to Giovanni Domenico Santorini (1681-1737), after whom this structure is named. The papilla duodeni (ampulla 'of Vater', or papilla 'of Santorini') is named after Abraham Vater (1684-1751) or after GD Santorini. Pancreas divisum, a persistence through non-fusion of the embryonic dorsal and ventral pancreas is a relatively common clinical condition, the discovery of which is usually ascribed to Joseph Hyrtl (1810-1894). In this review I report that pancreas divisum, the accessory duct and the papilla duodeni (ampulla 'of Vater') had all been observed and the observations published during the 17th century by at least seven anatomists before Santorini, Vater, and Hyrtl. I further suggest, in the light of frequent anatomical misattributions in common usage, that anatomical structures be referred to only by their proper anatomical names. The human pancreas forms during the seventh week of embryonic http://gut.bmj.com/ development by the fusion of two pancreatic primordia, one dorsal and the other ventral.1 4Each of these two primordia contains a duct, opening into the duodenum. After fusion, the distal part of the main duct of the pancreas ('Wirsung's duct') is formed from the duct of the ventral pancreas, and its proximal part from the proximal portion of the duct of the dorsal primordium.
    [Show full text]
  • Genevista Microdeletion and Microduplication Syndromes
    GeNeViSTA Microdeletion and Microduplication Syndromes: An Update Priya Ranganath, Prajnya Ranganath Department of Medical Genetics, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India Correspondence to: Dr Prajnya Ranganath Email: [email protected] Abstract containing dosage sensitive genes responsible for the phenotype is generally involved (Goldenberg, Microdeletion and microduplication syndromes 2018). Theoretically, for every microdeletion (MMS) also known as ‘contiguous gene syndrome there should be a reciprocal syndromes’ are a group of disorders caused microduplication syndrome, but microdeletions by sub-microscopic chromosomal deletions or are more common. Microduplications appear to duplications. Most of these conditions are typically result in a milder or no clinical phenotype. associated with developmental delay, autism, multiple congenital anomalies, and characteristic Molecular Etiopathology phenotypic features. These chromosomal abnormalities cannot be detected by conventional Copy number variation (CNV) is defined as the gain cytogenetic techniques like karyotyping and or loss of a stretch of DNA when compared with require higher resolution ‘molecular cytogenetic’ the reference human genome and may range in techniques. The advent of high throughput tests size from a kilobase to several megabases or even such as chromosomal microarray in the past one an entire chromosome. The CNVs associated with or two decades has led to a continuously growing MMS constitute only a small fraction of the total list of microdeletions and microduplication number of possible copy-number variants. There syndromes along with identification of the ‘critical are two major classes of CNVs: recurrent and region’ responsible for the main phenotypic non-recurrent. Recurrent CNVs generally result features associated with these syndromes. This from Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination review discusses the etiopathogenic mechanisms (NAHR) during meiosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Syndromic Ear Anomalies and Renal Ultrasounds
    Syndromic Ear Anomalies and Renal Ultrasounds Raymond Y. Wang, MD*; Dawn L. Earl, RN, CPNP‡; Robert O. Ruder, MD§; and John M. Graham, Jr, MD, ScD‡ ABSTRACT. Objective. Although many pediatricians cific MCA syndromes that have high incidences of renal pursue renal ultrasonography when patients are noted to anomalies. These include CHARGE association, Townes- have external ear malformations, there is much confusion Brocks syndrome, branchio-oto-renal syndrome, Nager over which specific ear malformations do and do not syndrome, Miller syndrome, and diabetic embryopathy. require imaging. The objective of this study was to de- Patients with auricular anomalies should be assessed lineate characteristics of a child with external ear malfor- carefully for accompanying dysmorphic features, includ- mations that suggest a greater risk of renal anomalies. We ing facial asymmetry; colobomas of the lid, iris, and highlight several multiple congenital anomaly (MCA) retina; choanal atresia; jaw hypoplasia; branchial cysts or syndromes that should be considered in a patient who sinuses; cardiac murmurs; distal limb anomalies; and has both ear and renal anomalies. imperforate or anteriorly placed anus. If any of these Methods. Charts of patients who had ear anomalies features are present, then a renal ultrasound is useful not and were seen for clinical genetics evaluations between only in discovering renal anomalies but also in the diag- 1981 and 2000 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los nosis and management of MCA syndromes themselves. Angeles and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in A renal ultrasound should be performed in patients with New Hampshire were reviewed retrospectively. Only pa- isolated preauricular pits, cup ears, or any other ear tients who underwent renal ultrasound were included in anomaly accompanied by 1 or more of the following: the chart review.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedside Neuro-Otological Examination and Interpretation of Commonly
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2004.054478 on 24 November 2004. Downloaded from BEDSIDE NEURO-OTOLOGICAL EXAMINATION AND INTERPRETATION iv32 OF COMMONLY USED INVESTIGATIONS RDavies J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl IV):iv32–iv44. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.054478 he assessment of the patient with a neuro-otological problem is not a complex task if approached in a logical manner. It is best addressed by taking a comprehensive history, by a Tphysical examination that is directed towards detecting abnormalities of eye movements and abnormalities of gait, and also towards identifying any associated otological or neurological problems. This examination needs to be mindful of the factors that can compromise the value of the signs elicited, and the range of investigative techniques available. The majority of patients that present with neuro-otological symptoms do not have a space occupying lesion and the over reliance on imaging techniques is likely to miss more common conditions, such as benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), or the failure to compensate following an acute unilateral labyrinthine event. The role of the neuro-otologist is to identify the site of the lesion, gather information that may lead to an aetiological diagnosis, and from there, to formulate a management plan. c BACKGROUND Balance is maintained through the integration at the brainstem level of information from the vestibular end organs, and the visual and proprioceptive sensory modalities. This processing takes place in the vestibular nuclei, with modulating influences from higher centres including the cerebellum, the extrapyramidal system, the cerebral cortex, and the contiguous reticular formation (fig 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Amyoplasia Or Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita [AMC]
    Arthrogryposis (Amyoplasia or Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita [AMC]) David S. Feldman, MD Chief of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery Professor of Orthopedic Surgery & Pediatrics NYU Langone Medical Center & NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases OVERVIEW The word “arthrogryposis” is actually a catch-all term used to describe instances of joint contractures that are present at birth. Treatment varies according to the cause and severity of the condition but when treatment begins at an early age, children can gradually become stronger and experience improved joint mobility and function that can last the rest of their lives. DESCRIPTION Arthrogryposis is a rare medical condition that only occurs in about 1 in 10,000 live births. The condition is characterized by malformed or stiff joints, muscles, and tendons that result in arms, legs, hands, and / or feet having limited to no mobility. The cognitive function of children with the condition is not affected. In fact, they are often extremely bright and communicative. CAUSES There is no one specific cause of arthrogryposis but the most common causes are genetics and intrauterine viruses. Genetic causes often only involve the hands and feet while other causes typically result in more generalized weakness and contractures. DIAGNOSIS METHODS Arthrogryposis tends to be found in its most severe form during newborn examinations. Given the various possible causes of arthrogryposis, proper diagnosis plays a very important role in determining treatment. Diagnosis methods may include MRI, muscle biopsies, blood tests, DNA testing, studies, and / or observations. TREATMENT Arthrogryposis may require very complex treatment and should therefore only be undertaken by health professionals who are not just familiar with the disease but have a high level of expertise in treating arthrogrypotic patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Differentiated Angiosarcoma of Spleen: a Teaching Case Mimicking
    Xu et al. World Journal of Surgical Oncology (2015) 13:300 DOI 10.1186/s12957-015-0716-1 WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CASE REPORT Open Access Well-differentiated angiosarcoma of spleen: a teaching case mimicking hemagioma and cytogenetic analysis with array comparative genomic hybridization Lichen Xu1†, Yimin Zhang1†, Hong Zhao1, Qingxiao Chen2, Weihang Ma1,3* and Lanjuan Li1 Abstract Primary splenic angiosarcoma is extremely rare but aggressive malignant vascular neoplasm. Here, we report a case of vascular tumor in spleen that was initially misinterpreted as hemangioma. Two years after splenectomy, the patient admitted again with aggravated abdomen pain and severe anemia. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed widely metastases. The ensuing biopsy for lesion both in liver and in bone marrow showed the similar pathological findings as that in spleen, which supported the final diagnosis of well-differentiated splenic angiosarcoma with extensive metastases. The patient was dead in 3 months after discharge without chemotherapy. The copy number changes for spleen lesion detected by array comparative genome hybridization showed copy number gain at 11q23.2, 11q24.3, 12q24.33, 13q34, copy number loss at 1q24.2-q31.3, 1q41-q42.2, 1 q42.3-q43, 2q36.3-q37.3, 2q37.7, 3q13.33-q26.2, 3q28 - q29, 9p11.2, 13q11, 15q11, homozygous copy loss at 8p11.22, 22q11.23. Less than 200 cases of splenic angiosarcoma have been published in literature of English. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time analyzed cytogenetic alteration in a well-differentiated primary splenic angiosarcoma. Keywords: Angiosarcoma, Well-differentiation, Splenectomy, Array comparative genomic hybridization, Copy number change Background cytogenetic changes to this subgroup of angiosarcoma Primary splenic angiosarcoma (PSA) is a rare malignant has been published.
    [Show full text]