Handbook of Zoology Beutel, R. G., and R. A. B. Leschen (Editors)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Handbook of Zoology Beutel, R. G., and R. A. B. Leschen (Editors) See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323973333 Handbook of Zoology Beutel, R. G., and R. A. B. Leschen (Editors). 2016. Handbook of zoology . Arthropoda: Insecta. Coleoptera, Beetles. Morphology and Systematics. Arch.... Article in The Coleopterists Bulletin · March 2018 DOI: 10.1649/0010-065X-72.1.138 CITATIONS READS 0 753 2 authors: Stylianos Chatzimanolis Adam J Brunke University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 152 PUBLICATIONS 1,005 CITATIONS 82 PUBLICATIONS 452 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Paleontology of amber fossils View project All content following this page was uploaded by Stylianos Chatzimanolis on 21 May 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 72(1): 138–139. 2018. BOOK REVIEW BEUTEL, R. G., AND R. A. B. LESCHEN (EDITORS). 2016. HANDBOOK OF ZOOLOGY.ARTHROPODA: INSECTA.COLEOPTERA,BEETLES.MORPHOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS.ARCHOSTEMATA,ADEPHAGA, MYXOPHAGA, AND POLYPHAGA PARTIM,VOLUME 1, 2ND EDITION. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. 684 pp. Hardcover. ISBN: 978-3-11-024906-4; ISSN 2193-4231. US$392.00. DOI.org/10.1649/0010-065X-72.1.138 Evolution) are great examples of a modern synthesis between paleontology and neontology, and they alone make it worthwhile for insect paleontologists to pick up this book. Although a few large chapters (Scarabaeoidea, Staphylinidae) were little updated in this new edition, they remain the important syntheses that they were in 2005. In a volume that is devoted mainly to morphol- ogy, one, of course, should not expect too many changes in the descriptive text. Nevertheless, we believe that an updated edition should include at least the following changes: updates to the number of taxa; updates to the classification; updated order and family-level phylogenies with their own headings; and ideally, new or improved photographs within previously existing chapters. It appears that the numbers of taxa were updated throughout the book, even in those chapters that were otherwise identical to their predecessors. On the other hand, illustrations (with a few exceptions) are mostly identical to the previous edition, al- though photographs now appear sharper and larger in this edition, which is a welcomed change. The classification of Coleoptera is presented in the second chapter of this volume, and it is strikingly The second edition of the Handbook of Zoology - different from that presented in the first edition of Beetles Volume 1 replaces the first edition 11 years this book. This speaks both to the enormous amount after the former’s publication (Beutel and Leschen of work done by beetle systematists over the last 2005). The second edition contains approximately decade or so and to the hard work of John Lawrence 100 pages more than the first, and Volume 1 now in integrating these changes. Some classification/ gains the familiar blue hardbound cover present in taxonomic inconsistencies still exist in this vol- Volumes 2 and 3. This volume, like its predecessor, ume, e.g., Bolbocertinae and Rhysodinae are treated is an essential major reference for anyone interested as subfamilies in Chapter 2 but as families in their in morphology and systematics of Coleoptera. respective sections (Scarabaeoidea and Adephaga). However, if one already has the first edition, should Both Rhysodinae (as Rhysodidae) and Scydmaeni- they invest again in this volume given the price tag? nae have their own chapters but really should have The new taxonomic treatments in this edition are been treated as subchapters, especially since it will be all exceptional. The chapters on Byrrhidae and quite some time before the next edition. There is now Scydmaeninae are very comprehensive with great il- ample phylogenetic evidence for subfamily rank in lustrations. The sections on Archostemata, Byrrhoidea, both taxa, and this is generally accepted by the and Scirtoidea are also updated and greatly improved Coleopterist community. This unfortunate organi- from the first edition. The chapter on Archostemata as zation, likely chosen for pragmatic reasons, retracts well as the first chapter of the book (Systematic from the otherwise cutting-edge and comprehensive Position, Basal Branching Pattern and Early feel of the book. 138 THE COLEOPTERISTS BULLETIN 72(1), 2018 139 Perhaps one of the greatest surprises in reviewing Coleopterists alike, and to paleoentomologists who this book was the overall lack of phylogenetic trees. should find the morphological diagnoses of families Certainly after 11 years of research, one would have extremely comprehensive. It is unfortunate that the expected the number of phylogenetic trees to in- PDF version costs exactly the same as the hardcopy, crease drastically in this edition. While up-to-date as the near US$400 price tag is surely out of reach for phylogenetic information is discussed in the text, many Coleopterists. For those who already own the modern phylogenetic trees (or no trees at all) are first edition of Volume 1, Volume 2 is especially noticeably absent in the chapters on Carabidae, worthwhile for its updates to classification and dis- Histeridae, Hydrophilidae, Staphylinidae, and cussion of evolutionary relationships. Scarabaeoidea, to name just a few popular taxa. While in some cases this has to do with timing (e.g., REFERENCES CITED several scarabaeoid and staphyliniform phylogenies were published in 2015–2016) or perhaps issues Beutel, R. G., and R. A. B. Leschen. 2005. Handbook of with obtaining a large number of copyright per- Zoology. Volume 4. Arthropoda: Insecta. Co- missions, the lack of phylogenetic information is leoptera, Beetles. Volume 1. Morphology and Systematics (Archostemata, Adephaga, Myx- felt in the context of such an otherwise compre- ophaga, Polyphaga partim. Walter de Gruyter, hensive work. The massive order-level morpholog- Berlin, Germany. ical phylogeny of Lawrence et al. (2011) is Lawrence, J, F., A. Slipi´´ nski, A. E. Seago, M. K. Thayer, mentioned in the preface to the second edition, but A. F. Newton, and A. E. Marvaldi. 2011. Phy- the tree itself is not used in Chapter 1. On the other logeny of the Coleoptera based on morphological hand, one new and welcome component of the characters of adults and larvae. Annales Zoologici volume, Chapter 3 (Molecular Systematics of Co- 61(1): 1–217. leoptera), is very well written, and the subsection “Resolving the Coleoptera tree of life” is an excellent Stylianos Chatzimanolis, Department of Biology, perspective on the next direction for beetle phylo- Geology and Environmental Science, University of genetics and the narrowing gap between phylogeny Tennessee at Chattanooga, 615 McCallie Ave., Dept. and paleontology. 2653, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA, stylianos- In a time when access to broad systematic and [email protected]. morphological knowledge of Coleoptera is be- coming rarer and rarer, this volume is sorely Adam J. Brunke, Canadian National Collection needed. Many obscure but phylogenetically im- of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes Agriculture portant taxa are made accessible by this volume in and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, K. W. detailed illustrations, and most authors have in- Neatby Building, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, CANADA, tegrated knowledge of the fossil record into their [email protected]. chapters, increasingly valuable with the modern direction of beetle phylogenetics. We strongly (Received 20 November 2017; accepted 13 January 2018. recommend this work for students and senior Publication date 23 March 2018.) View publication stats.
Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on Oribatid and Uropodine Mites: Prey Preferences and Hunting Behaviour
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(1): 151–164, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.023 ISSN 1210­5759 (print), 1802­8829 (online) Feeding of Scydmaenus rufus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on oribatid and uropodine mites: Prey preferences and hunting behaviour Paweł JAŁOSZYŃSKI 1 and ZIEMOWIT OLSZANOWSKI 2 1 Museum of Natural History, University of Wrocław, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae, Scydmaenini, Scydmaenus, Palaearctic, prey preferences, feeding behaviour, Oribatida, Uropodina Abstract. Prey preferences and feeding-related behaviour of a Central European species of Scydmaeninae, Scydmaenus rufus, were studied under laboratory conditions. Results of prey choice experiments involving 22 identified species of mites belonging to 13 families of Oribatida and two families of Mesostigmata (Uropodina) demonstrated that this beetle feeds mostly on oribatid Schelorib­ atidae (60.38% of prey) and Oppiidae (29.75%) and only occasionally on uropodine Urodinychidae (4.42%) and oribatid Mycobatidae (3.39%); species belonging to Trematuridae (Uropodina), Ceratozetidae and Tectocepheidae (Oribatida) were consumed occasionally. The number of mites consumed per beetle per day was 1.42, and when Oppia nitens was the prey, the entire feeding process took 2.93–5.58 h. Observations revealed that mechanisms for overcoming the prey’s defences depended on the body form of the mite. When attacking oribatids, with long and spiny legs, the beetles cut off one or two legs before killing the mite by inserting one mandible into its gnathosomal opening.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on Oribatid Mites: Prey Preferences and Hunting Behaviour
    Eur. J. Entomol. 110(2): 339–353, 2013 http://www.eje.cz/pdfs/110/2/339 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Specialized feeding of Euconnus pubicollis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) on oribatid mites: Prey preferences and hunting behaviour 1 2 PAWEŁ JAŁOSZYŃSKI and ZIEMOWIT OLSZANOWSKI 1 Museum of Natural History, Wrocław University, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wrocław, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae, Cyrtoscydmini, Euconnus, Palaearctic, prey preferences, feeding behaviour, Acari, Oribatida Abstract. Prey preferences and feeding-related behaviour of a Central European species of Scydmaeninae, Euconnus pubicollis, were studied under laboratory conditions. Results of prey choice experiments involving 50 species of mites belonging to 24 families of Oribatida and one family of Uropodina demonstrated that beetles feed mostly on ptyctimous Phthiracaridae (over 90% of prey) and only occasionally on Achipteriidae, Chamobatidae, Steganacaridae, Oribatellidae, Ceratozetidae, Euphthiracaridae and Galumni- dae. The average number of mites consumed per beetle per day was 0.27 ± 0.07, and the entire feeding process took 2.15–33.7 h and showed a clear linear relationship with prey body length. Observations revealed a previously unknown mechanism for capturing prey in Scydmaeninae in which a droplet of liquid that exudes from the mouth onto the dorsal surface of the predator’s mouthparts adheres to the mite’s cuticle. Morphological adaptations associated with this strategy include the flattened distal parts of the maxillae, whereas the mandibles play a minor role in capturing prey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae) in Mainland China
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 572: 51–70Contributions (2016) to the knowledge of the genus Horaeomorphus Schaufuss... 51 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.572.7474 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Contributions to the knowledge of the genus Horaeomorphus Schaufuss (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae) in mainland China De-Yao Zhou1, Su-Jiong Zhang2, Li-Zhen Li1 1 Department of Biology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, 100 Guilin Road, Shanghai, 200234, P. R. China 2 Forestry Bureau of Pan’an County, Pan’an 322300, Zhejiang, China Corresponding author: Li-Zhen Li ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Stoev | Received 10 December 2015 | Accepted 12 February 2016 | Published 15 March 2016 http://zoobank.org/2427CCB8-B274-4D96-83DE-391125C5F8BC Citation: Zhou D-Y, Zhang S-J, Li L-Z (2016) Contributions to the knowledge of the genus Horaeomorphus Schaufuss (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae) in mainland China. ZooKeys 572: 51–70. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.572.7474 Abstract Five new species of the ant-like stone beetle genus Horaeomorphus Schaufuss (Scydmaeninae: Glan- dulariini) from China are described: H. hainanicus sp. n., H. biwenxuani sp. n., H. pengzhongi sp. n., H. hujiayaoi sp. n. and H. punctatus sp. n. The previously unknown male of H. chinensis Franz, 1985 is now discovered, and its aedeagus and metatrochanter are illustrated. The latter species is newly recorded from Zhejiang. Three females from Guangxi are also recorded, but their identity remains unconfirmed until associated males become available. A key to Horaeomorphus of mainland China is included. Keywords Scydmaeninae, Glandulariini, Horaeomorphus, new species, new records, Oriental, China Copyright De-Yao Zhou et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles of Hertfordshire – Corrections and Amendments, with an Update on Additional Species, and Other Important New Records Trevor J
    Lepidoptera (butterfl ies): Andrew Wood, 93 Hertfordshire Environmental Records Centre, Bengeo Street, Hertford, SG14 3EZ; Tel: 01992- Grebe House, St Michael’s Street, St Albans, AL3 4SN, 503571; email: [email protected] and records Tel: 01727 858901; email: [email protected] via www. hertsmiddx-butterfl ies.org.uk/recording- new.php A big thank you to Trevor James and Rev Tom Gladwin for an enormous recording eff ort for the Hymenoptera (Formicidae; ants): Phil Attewell, County over many years. Trevor is taking a step 69 Thornbury Gardens, Borehamwood, WD6 1RD; back but still involved with the fl ora. He remains the email: [email protected] recorder for Beetles. Many thanks to our new recorders for taking on Hymenoptera (bees and wasps), millipedes groups this past year. Drs Ian Denholm and Alla and centipedes: Stephen Lings Email: lings24@ Mashanova will be managing the fl ora,David Willis btinternet.com the arachnids and Stephen Lings the bees, wasps, millipedes and centipedes. There are still a number of Coleoptera (beetles – general): Trevor James, 56 vacancies for particular groups. If anyone has some Back Street, Ashwell, Baldock, SG7 5PE; Tel: 01462 expertise/interest in any of the groups below or any 742684; email: [email protected] groups not currently covered within Hertfordshire, please contact the Chair of the Biological Recorders, Dr Coleoptera (water beetles): Stuart Warrington, 8 Ronni Edmonds-Brown, Department of Biological and Redwoods, Welwyn Garden City, AL8 7NR; Tel: 01707 Environmental Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, 885676; email: stuart.warrington@ nationaltrust.org. Hatfi eld, AL10 9AB Email: v.r.edmonds-brown@herts.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Bibliography of Archaeoentomology
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Distance Master of Science in Entomology Projects Entomology, Department of 4-2020 An Annotated Bibliography of Archaeoentomology Diana Gallagher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entodistmasters Part of the Entomology Commons This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Distance Master of Science in Entomology Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Diana Gallagher Master’s Project for the M.S. in Entomology An Annotated Bibliography of Archaeoentomology April 2020 Introduction For my Master’s Degree Project, I have undertaken to compile an annotated bibliography of a selection of the current literature on archaeoentomology. While not exhaustive by any means, it is designed to cover the main topics of interest to entomologists and archaeologists working in this odd, dark corner at the intersection of these two disciplines. I have found many obscure works but some publications are not available without a trip to the Royal Society’s library in London or the expenditure of far more funds than I can justify. Still, the goal is to provide in one place, a list, as comprehensive as possible, of the scholarly literature available to a researcher in this area. The main categories are broad but cover the most important subareas of the discipline. Full books are far out-numbered by book chapters and journal articles, although Harry Kenward, well represented here, will be publishing a book in June of 2020 on archaeoentomology.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 8 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Number 3 - Fall 1975 Article 4 October 1975 Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera M G. de Viedma University of Madrid M L. Nelson Wayne State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation de Viedma, M G. and Nelson, M L. 1975. "Current Classification of the amiliesF of Coleoptera," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 8 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol8/iss3/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. de Viedma and Nelson: Current Classification of the Families of Coleoptera THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST CURRENT CLASSIFICATION OF THE FAMILIES OF COLEOPTERA M. G. de viedmal and M. L. els son' Several works on the order Coleoptera have appeared in recent years, some of them creating new superfamilies, others modifying the constitution of these or creating new families, finally others are genera1 revisions of the order. The authors believe that the current classification of this order, incorporating these changes would prove useful. The following outline is based mainly on Crowson (1960, 1964, 1966, 1967, 1971, 1972, 1973) and Crowson and Viedma (1964). For characters used on classification see Viedma (1972) and for family synonyms Abdullah (1969). Major features of this conspectus are the rejection of the two sections of Adephaga (Geadephaga and Hydradephaga), based on Bell (1966) and the new sequence of Heteromera, based mainly on Crowson (1966), with adaptations.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Synanthropic Beetle Faunas Over the Last 9000 Years in the British Isles Smith, David; Hill, Geoff; Kenward, Harry; Allison, Enid
    University of Birmingham Development of synanthropic beetle faunas over the last 9000 years in the British Isles Smith, David; Hill, Geoff; Kenward, Harry; Allison, Enid DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105075 License: Other (please provide link to licence statement Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Smith, D, Hill, G, Kenward, H & Allison, E 2020, 'Development of synanthropic beetle faunas over the last 9000 years in the British Isles', Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 115, 105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105075 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3/ General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Nose'-A Bizarre Stem Scydmaenine in Amber from Myanmar (Coleoptera
    Cretaceous Research 89 (2018) 98e106 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cretaceous Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Short communication Beetle with long ‘nose’dA bizarre stem scydmaenine in amber from Myanmar (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Scydmaeninae) * Ziwei Yin a, Chenyang Cai b, c, d, , Alfred F. Newton e a Department of Biology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, China b Key Laboratory of Economic Stratigraphy and Palaeogeography, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China c School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK d Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, 210008, China e Center for Integrative Research, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, 60605, United States article info abstract Article history: The staphylinid subfamily Scydmaeninae is a diverse assemblage of small predaceous beetles, repre- Received 23 January 2018 sented by some 5360 extant and 51 extinct species. Recent explorations of Mesozoic scydmaenine fauna Received in revised form in Burmese, Canadian, French, and Spanish ambers have shed intriguing light on the early evolution, 11 March 2018 systematics, and particular aspects of predator-prey relationship among this group. However, in contrast Accepted in revised form 22 March 2018 to extant diversity, well-preserved fossils allowing for sufficient morphological studies and ecological Available online 23 March 2018 reconstructions are extremely rare. Here we report a highly advanced glandulariine scydmaenine, Nuegua elongata Yin, Cai & Newton, gen. et sp. nov., based on a large series of fifteen exquisitely pre- Keywords: Taxonomy served specimens entombed in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. IV. Part 1o. HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS COLEOPTERA HISTEROIDEA By D. G. H. HALSTEAD LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms 4-1, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 28th February, 1963 Price 4-s. 6d. ACCESSION_NO 785 Halstead D G H COLEOPTERA: HISTEROIDEA VJI-IICH COPY NO_OF_COPIES s I. British Entomological & Natural History Society At the Rooms of The Alpine Club 74 South Audley Street, London. W.l. Presented by . ( :... O.:.... Hf/4.?1.~ .................. II. Date Ill. IV. f.Sr..tl!lo ... ..... i?.,.R..m.b.... VI. v:r.... Librarian VI I ACCESSION NUMBER ..................... ... .. no1 IS British Entomological & Natural History Society eac c/o Dinton Pastures Country Park, mu Davis Street, Hurst, it is Reading, Berkshire RG10 OTH ava me Presented by of:iJ ~st Date Librarian REGULATIONS I.-No member shall be allowed to borrow more than five volumes at a time, or to keep any of them longer than three months. 2.-A member shall at any time on demand by the Librarian forthwith return any volumes in his possession. 3.-Members damaging, ·losing, or destroying any book belonging to the Society shall either provide a new copy or pay such sum as the Council shall think fit.
    [Show full text]