Official Site, Telegram, Facebook, Instagram, Instamojo
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Module Detail Subject Name Political Science Paper Name Indian Politics
Module Detail Subject Name Political Science Paper Name Indian Politics: I THE JUDICIARY IN INDIA Module Name/Title Module Id Pre-requisites To understand and evaluate the working of Objectives Indian Judicial System. To explain the evolution and rise of the Supreme Court in India. Role of judicial activism towards public interest litigation and in what way it contributed to shape the nature and contours of judicial activism in India. To explain various problems and challenges faced by the judiciary and reform initiatives to address them. Judiciary, Role and Functioning, the Supreme Court, Keywords Public Interest Litigation, Judicial Overreach, Judicial Activism, Judicial Accountability, Reforms, India. 1 Role Name Affiliation Principal Investigator Prof. Ashutosh Kumar Panjab University Chandigarh. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Paper Coordinator Delhi University, Delhi. Dr. Niranjan Sahoo Content Writer/Author (CW) Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Content Reviewer (CR) Delhi University, Delhi. Dr. Ajay K Mehra Language Editor (LE) Delhi University, Delhi. THE JUDICIARY IN INDIA Niranjan Sahoo Introduction From being a reliable guardian and protector of constitution, an able propagator of rights of poor and faceless citizens to an institution of last recourse for millions of citizens to activism on issues that often get little or no attention from the executive, the judiciary in India has come full circle since its inception in 1950. The judiciary which has so far played extremely stellar role in having emerged as institution of last resort as executive and legislative branches have failed to perform their constitutional roles, has in many occasions intruded into the constitutional spaces of other organs. -
In Late Colonial India: 1942-1944
Rohit De ([email protected]) LEGS Seminar, March 2009 Draft. Please do not cite, quote, or circulate without permission. EMASCULATING THE EXECUTIVE: THE FEDERAL COURT AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN LATE COLONIAL INDIA: 1942-1944 Rohit De1 On the 7th of September, 1944 the Chief Secretary of Bengal wrote an agitated letter to Leo Amery, the Secretary of State for India, complaining that recent decisions of the Federal Court were bringing the governance of the province to a standstill. “In war condition, such emasculation of the executive is intolerable”, he thundered2. It is the nature and the reasons for this “emasculation” that the paper hopes to uncover. This paper focuses on a series of confrontations between the colonial state and the colonial judiciary during the years 1942 to 1944 when the newly established Federal Court struck down a number of emergency wartime legislations. The courts decisions were unexpected and took both the colonial officials and the Indian public by surprise, particularly because the courts in Britain had upheld the legality of identical legislation during the same period. I hope use this episode to revisit the discussion on the rule of law in colonial India as well as literature on judicial behavior. Despite the prominence of this confrontation in the public consciousness of the 1940’s, its role has been downplayed in both historical and legal accounts. As I hope to show this is a result of a disciplinary divide in the historical engagement with law and legal institutions. Legal scholarship has defined the field of legal history as largely an account of constitutional and administrative developments paralleling political developments3. -
Daily Current Affairs Date: 09 JANUARY 2021
Daily Current Affairs Date: 09 JANUARY 2021 1. Which country will chair the three-key subsidiary 6. Who has been become first female match official bodies of the United Nations Council, which include during the pink test between India and Australia? Counter-Terrorism Committee (for 2022), Taliban (A) Claire Polosak (B) Jacqueline Williams Sanctions Committee, and Libya Sanctions committee? (C) Phillip Gillespie (D) Shawn Craig (A) China (B) Saudi Arabia (E) Langton Rusere (C) America (D) Britain (E) India 7. Which edition of Pravasi Bharatiya Divas Convention will be held in a virtual format with the theme 2. The Centre has merged the officers of IAS, IPS and "Contributing to Aatmanirbhar Bharat" which also IFOS cadres of which union territory into the cadre of provides a significant platform to engage and connect AGMUT (Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Mizoram, and Union with overseas citizens? Territory)? (A) 13th (B) 19th (A) Andaman and Nicobar Islands (C) 15th (D) 16th (B) Dadra and Nagar Haveli (E) 14th (C) Jammu and Kashmir (D) Daman and Diu 8. The Reserve Bank of India informed that the legal (E) Lakshadweep entity identifiers will be mandatory for all the fund transfers worth Rs 50 crores and above. The Legal 3. Name the Indian-American who has taken over as the Entity Identifiers is a ___ number that will be used to first Chief Information Officer of the US Army, after the uniquely identify the parties involved in financial Pentagon created the position. transactions all over the world. (A) Har Gobind Khorana (B) Subramanyan Chandrasekhar (A) 12 digit (B) 25 digit (C) Amartya Sen (D) Raj Iyer (C) 09 digit (D) 08 digit (E) Venkatraman Ramakrishnan (E) 20 digit 4. -
Is a Federal Party Possible?
Established 1946 1 Pages 16 Price : Rupees Five Vol. 73 No. 10 Is a Federal Party Possible? April 1, 2018 Kuldip Nayar BJP’s Forays in North Eastern States and When former Congress President underline the Congress cooperation, Anti Minority Agenda Sonia Gandhi said that they would Mamata has said that she is daily in Ram Puniyani not allow the Bhartiya Janata Party touch with Sonia Gandhi. In fact, (BJP) to return to power, she hinted the leaders from other non-BJP ruled at a joint action on the part of the states are constantly in touch with India Needs Draupadi And Opposition. It also means that each other to see the possibility of a Not Savitri she does not want Prime Minister federal structure. Rajindar Sachar Narendra Modi to for the second If you recall, the Janata Party term. On its own, the Congress does was a federal structure. It did not not have the numbers to pose any last its course and fell because the Anti-Muslim Riots threat to the BJP-run government then leaders, particularly the top in Sri Lanka or Modi. ones like Morarji Desai and Chanran Irfan Engineer In all probability, as things Singh, quarrelling in public all the stand today, Modi looks good time, much to the exasperation of the enough to returning to power. people. Then the Jana Sangh wielded The three reverses in recent by- power because the opponents were Arvind Kejriwal’s Apology elections to the Lok Sabha and a divided lot. Once the non-Jana Letter and Middle Class Standard of Ethics state assemblies notwithstanding, Sangh parties came together, the Nishikant Mohapatra the BJP is capturing power in state Jana Sangh government was reduced after state and spreading its tentacles to a minority. -
Section:X in the Supreme Court of India Civil Original
SECTION:X IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 BETWEEN: Dr. Akkai Padmashali & Ors. …Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors................................................... Respondents I N D E X Sl No PartiCulars Copies Court Fee 1. List of Dates 1+3 2. Writ Petition with Affidavit 1+3 Rs. 3. Annexure-P-1 to P- 1+3 Rs. 4. Listing Proforma 1+1 5. Vakalatnama with Memo of Appearance. Rs. Rs. Filed By: (O.P. Bhadani) Advocate for the Petitioners Office: O-1/B, LGF (Basement) Jangpura Extension, ND-14 CODE NO. 1934 I.C. No.4812 Mob: 9717268550 New Delhi Filed On: .07.2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 IN THE MATTER OF: Dr. Akkai Padmashali & Ors. …Petitioners Vs. Union of India & Ors.................................................. Respondents P A P E R B O O K [FOR INDEX, PLEASE SEE INSIDE] ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS: O.P. BHADANI SYNOPSIS 1. The Petitioners, who are members of the transgender community, are filing the present Writ Petition seeking a declaration that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is unconstitutional, being violative of their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. 2. The Constitutionality of Section 377 IPC has been upheld by this Hon’ble Court in the judgment reported as Suresh Kumar Koushal v. Naz Foundation, (2014) 1 SCC 1. After dismissal of Review Petitions filed to challenge the said judgment, Curative Petitions were filed, and this Hon’ble Court has been pleased to direct the matters to be heard by a Constitution Bench. -
SBI FUNDS MANAGMENT PRIVATE LIMITED (A Joint Venture Between SBI & AMUNDI)
SBI FUNDS MANAGMENT PRIVATE LIMITED (A joint Venture between SBI & AMUNDI) 22nd Annual Report 2013-2014 Board of Directors of SBI Funds Management Private Limited (As on June 30, 2014) Smt. Arundhati Mr. Fathi Jerfel Mr. Dinesh Kumar Mr. Jashvant Raval Dr. H.K.Pradhan Bhattarcharya Director Khara Director Director Chairman Managing Director & CEO Smt. Madhu Dubhashi Dr. H.Sadhak Mr. Thierry Mr. Shishir Mr. Philippe Director Director Mequillet Joshipura Batchevitch Director Director Alternate Director to Mr. Fathi Jerfel Auditors Sudit K Parekh & Co. Chartered Accountants Ballard House, 2nd Floor, Adi Marzvan Path Ballard Pier, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001 Bankers State Bank of India Registered Office 9th Floor, Crescenzo, C- 38 & 39 G Block, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051 Tel: +91 22 61793000 Fax ; + 91 22 67425687 Website : www.sbimf.com SBI FUNDS MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED Index CONTENTS PAGES SBI FUNDS MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED DIRECTORS’ REPORT 4 AUDITORS’ REPORT 11 ANNEXURE TO THE AUDITORS’ REPORT 13 COMMENTS OF THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 15 BALANCE SHEET 16 PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT 17 CASH FLOW STATEMENT 18 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 20 SBI FUNDS MANAGEMENT (INTERNATIONAL) PRIVATE LIMITED CORPORATE DATA 43 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT 44 COMMENTARY OF THE DIRECTORS 47 SECRETARY’S CERTIFICATE 48 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 49 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 51 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 52 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 53 STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW 54 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 55 3 SBI FUNDS MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED DIRECTORS’ REPORT TO, THE MEMBERS The Directors have pleasure in presenting the twenty second annual report together with the Statement of Profit and Loss of SBI Funds Management Private Limited for the year ended March 31, 2014 and the Balance Sheet together with the Cash Flow Statement as at that date. -
Current Affairs= 08-10-2020
CURRENT AFFAIRS= 08-10-2020 RIGHT TO PROTEST The Supreme Court has said that occupying public places for protests is not acceptable and such a space cannot be occupied indefinitely. Key highlights of the judgement: The verdict came on a plea against the Anti-Citizenship Amendment Act protests which had led to blocking of a road in Shaheen Bagh in the national capital last December. It said that public places cannot be occupied indefinitely like during the Shaheen Bagh protests. The judgment upheld the right to peaceful protest against a law but made it unequivocally clear that public ways and public spaces cannot be occupied, and that too indefinitely. In a democracy, the rights of free speech and peaceful protest were indeed “treasured”. They were to be encouraged and respected, the court said. But these rights were also subject to reasonable restrictions imposed in the interest of sovereignty, integrity and public order. Police regulations also weighed in. Fundamental rights do not live in isolation. The right of the protester has to be balanced with the right of the commuter. They have to co-exist in mutual respect. The bench also said that Delhi Police ought to have taken action to clear Shaheen Bagh area from the protesters. It was entirely the responsibility of the administration to prevent encroachments in public spaces. NOBEL PRIZE IN CHEMISTRY 2020 Emmanuelle Charpentier of France and Jennifer Doudna of the U.S. won the Nobel Chemistry Prize for the gene-editing technique known as the CRISPR- CROSS & CLIMB 2019 1 Cas9 DNA snipping “scissors”, the first time a Nobel science prize has gone to a women-only team. -
Justice Prakash Tatia 1. Date of Birth: 4Th August, 1951 2. Education
Justice Prakash Tatia 1. Date of birth: 4th August, 1951 2. Education: B.Sc. (Biology) 1972, LL.B, 1975 3. Enrolled as Advocate: 1975 4. Judge Rajasthan High Court: 11.01.2001 5. Judge Jharkhand High Court: 11.04.2011 6. Act. Chief Justice Jharkhand High Court: 13.05.2011 7. Chief Justice Jharkhand High Court: 11.09.2011 8. Chairperson Armed Forces Tribunal, New Delhi: 23.08.2013 9. Chairperson, Rajasthan State Human Rights Commission, Jaipur: 11.03.2016 10. Was Member, Advisory Committee, National Court Management Systems (NCMS), constituted by Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, Hon’ble Shri S. H. Kapadia First Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice Altamas Kabir, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. Sathasivam, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Second Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. Sathasivam, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice R. M. Lodha, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Third Committee (a) Hon’ble Shri Justice R. M. Lodha, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (b) Hon’ble Shri Justice H.L. Duttu, Judge, Supreme Court of India. (c) Hon’ble Shri Justice P. C. Tatia, Chief Justice, Jharkhand High Court. Justice Prakash Tatia, when he was Judge of Raj. High Court, he was appointed as 11. Executive Chairperson, Raj. State Legal Services Authority, 12. Chairperson, Raj. State Judicial Academy, 03.03.2009 – 10.04.2011 13. -
Keesing's Contemporary Archives
KEESING'S CONTEMPORARY ARCHIVES WEEKLY DIARY OF IMPORTANT WORLD EVENTS WITH INDEX CONTINUALLY KEPT UP-TO-DATE ESTABLISHED IN 1931 Reports, Statistics and Data selected, condensed, translated, summarised, and indexed from news papers, periodicals, and official publications of Great Britain, the British Empire, and Foreign Countries; as well as from information supplied by the recognised international news agencies VOLUME No. VI 1946-1948 KEESING'S PUBLICATIONS LIMITED (of London) 65 Bristol Road • Keynsham • Bristol 8930 KEESING'S CONTEMPORARY ARCHIVES November 8—15, 1947. A. INDIA - PAKISTAN. — The Kashmir Situation. - be supported " ; declared that the Kashmiri authorities had ignored Kashmiri and Pakistani Allegations and Counter- Pakistani suggestions, made much earlier, that representatives of Allegations of Frontier Violations. - Invasion of Kashmir both Governments should meet to seek a solution of outstanding by Moslem Tribesmen. - Kashmir's Accession to India. - difficulties ; and added that the Kashmiri Government's " unfounded allegations and accusations" were merely a " smoke-screen" Non-Acceptance by Pakistan. - Statements by Mr. intended to cover the real purposes of that Government's policy. Jinnah, Mr. Liaquat Ali Khan, and Pandit Nehru. - Mr. Jinnah went on to accuse the Kashmiri Government of differ Indian Troops sent to Kashmir. - Invaders driven from ential treatment of Moslems and non-Moslems, saying that on the Srinagar Approaches. - Kashmir Plebiscite on Accession one hand the Sheikh Mohamed Abdullah, who had been -
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 1968
CJB. ill; N*. tat LOK SABHA THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS BILL, 1968 (Report of the Joint Committee) [Presented on the 26th March, 1969] L O K SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI March, jjtyfChaitra, 18 9 1 iSoka) P r ic e : R s. 1.45 REPORTS OF THfi JOIflC/SELECT COMMITTEES " "jBEBaBn a p to larara'iM um m b — -------------- YE1B m v .--------------------- •* • 31.No. Name Presented on 1# Contract labour (Regulation and Abolition) 26*2*69 B ill, 1967 -(Joint Committee report) 2* ~/o—' Evidence 3* Lokpa? and Lokayuktas B ill, 1968 26*3*69 ( J o i r t Committee report) , * 4* -do- Evidence 5* -do- Statement containing a gist of main points made by Witnesses in their Evidence before the Joint Committee* 6* Government (Liability in Tort) B ill,1967 25*3*69 (Report of the Joint Committee)^ 7* -do- Evidenoe 8* Constitution (Twenty-Seoond) Amendment 12*3*69 B ill, 1968 (Report of Joint Committee) 9* -do- Evidence 10* Indian Penal Code (Amendment) B ill,1967 1*5*69 (Report of the Seleot Committee) ?heduled Castes and Schedules Tribes 17*11*69 Mere (Amendment) B ill, 1967 x>rt of the Joint Committee) ’o- Evidence of the Appellate (Criminal) 17*11*69 i.o i s 4k.of the Supreme Court B ill, i^i Anand Narain Mulla,M*P* ' Seleot Committee) LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT CORRIGENDA TO ' THE REPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE LOKPAL AND LOKAYUKTAS BILL, 1968. "" Report of the Joint Committee 1. Page (viii), line 15, for"1850" read"1950". 2. Page (viii), line 23, for "Commitee" read "Committee". -
Ambedkar Law University Journal
THE TAMIL NADU Dr. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY Ambedkar Law University Journal (A Peer Reviewed Journal) Annual Journal of Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University ISSN 0979-965X Combined Issue Volume No.XI to XV 2016 – 2020 The Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University (A State University) “Poompozhil, 5, Dr. D.G.S. Dinakaran Salai, Chennai – 600 028. Journal Advisory Committee Hon'ble Justice Indira Banerjee, Hon’ble Judge, Supreme Court of India Prof. A. Lakshminath, Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Maharashtra National Law University, Aurangabad. Prof. Subir Bhatnagar, Vice Chancellor, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow Prof. K.C. Sunny, Vice Chancellor, National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Cochin Prof. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Director of Indian Law Institute, New Delhi. Prof. Arvind Tiwari, Dean - School of Law, Rights and Constitutional Governance, Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Chief Editor Prof. (Dr.) T S N Sastry, Vice Chancellor, TNDALU Editor Prof. (Dr.) K S Sarwani, SOEL, TNDALU Editorial board Prof. (Dr.) V Balaji, Director i/c, U G Studies, SOEL, TNDALU Dr. S K Asok Kumar, Librarian, SOEL, TNDALU Dr. Ranjit Oommen Abraham, Assistant Professor (S.G), SOEL, TNDALU Editorial Assistance Mr. Rahul Reghu, Assistant Professor (On Contract Basis), SOEL, TNDALU Dr. B Viswanathan, Assistant Professor (On Contract Basis), SOEL, TNDALU DISCLAIMER The Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University shall be the sole copyright owner of all the published material. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study or criticism no part of this journal may be used in any form whatsoever without prior written permission from the publisher The views expressed in the articles are personal opinions of the contributors and are in no sense official neither of The Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University nor the Chief Editor or Editorial Board. -
News Letter Vol. I, No. 2, July-September 2012
Vol. I, No. 2, July-September 2012 INSIDE EDITORIAL When this Newsletter is going to press, the nation mourns the horrific NEW CJI death of a young student, after she was brutally gang-raped and ACTIVITIES AT THE LAW SCHOOL assaulted in a moving bus in south Delhi recently. This tragic and eye- FORTHCOMING EVENTS opening incident calls for reflection – reflection about laws which have FACULTY UPDATES so far failed to check the frequent incidents of sexual assault on women LEGISLATIVE TRENDS not just in the national capital but also in other parts of the country and reflection about INTERNATIONAL LEGAL NEWS AND EVENTS the society in which we live in. An outraged and shocked nation demands stringent RECENT JUDICIAL DECISIONS punishments for rapists including death penalty in rarest of rare cases at least. But MY EXPERIENCE WITH LEGAL administration of capital punishment is not without problems. Delays in sentencing and AID PROGRAMME OF LAW executions, growing number of death row convicts and inconsistencies in the Supreme SCHOOL Court's own jurisprudence on death penalty call for an informed debate over the necessity of retaining death penalty in the statute books. Furthermore, death penalty shifts the focus away from the real issue to the controversies surrounding the penalty itself. Editorial Committee Social outrage leads to reform; and in the wake of Delhi gang-rape case, one can hope Editor in Chief that some far reaching criminal law reforms await us. But not just the criminal law Professor B.C.Nirmal reform-substantive and procedural but also police and judicial reforms are the need of Head and Dean Managing Editor the hour.