Getting Customers to Say, 'The Price Is Right!'

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Getting Customers to Say, 'The Price Is Right!' 15 Getting customers to say, ‘The price is right!’ In a world where too many companies still believe that ‘if we build it they will come,’ practitioners of semiconductor sales know otherwise. This article lays out the elements essential to extracting the most value for current products by effectively communicating the true value of those products to customers. Gaurav Batra and Keeping the marketing and sales engines humming larger issue underlying habitual discounting Olivia Nottebohm profitably is a cornerstone of all successful compa- in semiconductors is the acceptance on the part of nies. It is especially important in the semiconductor semiconductor companies that a dynamic built industry, where the leaders in each product seg- into the industry as a whole will always drive prices ment usually take most of the profits. Things often down. Companies therefore often fail to address go wrong when companies feel their market and can even contribute to the shortfall by expect- share is threatened. Frequently, the first response of ing nothing better. However, companies can both leading and lagging players is to discount begin to reverse this trend by revisiting the value prices. Closer analysis, however, often reveals that proposition they are offering to customers, this move needlessly dilutes value that could specifically to determine whether the true, unique have been retained despite competitive pressure. value of their products is being communicated. This is where the journey to value selling begins. In semiconductors, discounting is not just a strategy but an industry norm—a condition that The value-selling approach has prevailed owing to an industry adaptation We have devoted considerable research and drawn to extremely tight innovation cycles. That is, the upon extensive engagement experience to create 16 McKinsey on Semiconductors Autumn 2011 an approach to sales by which companies can The transition to a value-based selling approach better understand their existing value propositions, involves a fundamental change in existing identify where these are failing them, and make sales approaches and marketing messages. The the transition to a customer-centric approach that constituent tactical shifts of the approach immediately demonstrates the full value of are made based on deep-structure interviews with their products to customers. A value-selling customers, as well as by working to identify approach allows companies to pursue and capture the value of the company’s offerings. A company margin according to the end-to-end value provided adopting this approach will also need to to the customer, as opposed to the traditional construct a set of new tools for the sales force and cost-plus approach. Even in the semiconductor build value-selling capabilities in the workforce. industry—with its engineering culture that Last, it must develop metrics to track sales-force is particularly comfortable with cost-plus pricing— performance over time. A formal transformation most client executives have been pleasantly program is necessary to sustain the transition; the surprised to see the top-line impact possible from good news is that the scope can be either value selling, especially as it requires no changes narrow or broad, focusing on a single product family to the existing product portfolio. In the first year, or region, or encompassing a program that value selling can add 2 to 4 percent to average repositions a company’s entire product portfolio. selling prices, a number that can grow to 6 to 8 percent in the second year if customer Identifying value to the customer insights are fed back into the design of Value selling requires, at its base, an under- new products. standing of the true value of the product to the customer. Most customers think of value as Our original findings were based on practical apparent value—that is, the benefit they receive experience. We interviewed dozens of one directly from a purchase. They rarely consider company’s end customers, asking each of them to indirect benefits, such as the positive or negative allocate 100 points among the different factors impact of switching costs, or the infrastructure in their process for making purchasing decisions. savings that come from sticking to current product The great majority of those surveyed identified lines. In addition, a mind-set has been observed price as the most important factor in their final in both companies and their customers by which decision. Deeper analysis of those responses current prices are expected wholly to deter- revealed, however, that some groups of customers mine future prices. Accordingly, unless the product actually cared as much or more about features changes, the price should rise only in line than about price. It turned out that some customers with inflation or if particular input costs increase. were knowingly paying more for the client’s This generally leads companies to neglect the product than they would have for the next-best question of how the value of their products evolves alternative. The discovery of this partly over time. hidden preferential-buying behavior led to a conclusion that a sales approach that In all, there are four components to implementing communicates a holistic view of value could a value-selling approach: developing a new positively affect the way that customers approach to purchasing criteria, building a new set think about purchases. of tools to support the sales teams in the field, Getting customers to say, ‘The price is right!’ 17 developing training to educate sales teams on the • Ease of use and ability to design in, without new sales approach, and developing metrics many additional modifications and systems to track the sales force’s performance over time. • Advantaged size and packaging to enable greater bill-of-materials integration 1. Uncovering customer purchasing criteria The first step in the new direction is a diagnostic • A better set of built-in capabilities to reduce analysis aimed at uncovering the key criteria the need for additional discrete peripherals, that customers use to make purchasing decisions. board design, or programming This may seem counterintuitive, as company sales and marketing teams would be expected to At the company level, we have found that cus- know these criteria already. Typically, top tomers derive value from the following elements: salespeople do know exactly what matters to their customers, but their less skilled • The reputation of the provider—for example, colleagues may not; best practices are not the value of saying “powered by x” or always shared or institutionalized in “includes y processor” a form that is useful to less experienced account managers. We begin with interviews to • Strong development and technical- determine the elements that matter most to support capabilities customers and to understand how these are prioritized. The exercise is highly qualitative, • Advantaged supply-chain and manufacturing requiring dozens of interviews throughout capabilities, resulting in higher product the customer base. availability, better quality assurance, and superior reliability The diagnostic yields three results: a list of factors that are most important to customers, a • Developer tools and well-established ranking of those factors in order of importance, code libraries—for instance, a network of and, critically, an assessment of company independent software vendors (ISVs) performance against those value drivers in any for microprocessors particular product category. In a value-selling pilot, one customer said, “If it To go beyond articulated preferences, we saves me development cost and improves my conduct a conjoint analysis to quantify value time to market by x percent, I am not going to go drivers at both the individual product for a cheaper device.” This remark neatly level and the broader company level. Typical sums up the reasoning behind value selling and findings from diagnostics of the sources the source of its impact. of value at the product level have included these attributes: 2. The value-selling tool: Communicating quantifiable value to your customer • Superior performance with regard to power Once a company understands the real value of efficiency, speed, graphic resolution, and so on its products to its customers, it must develop 18 McKinsey on Semiconductors Autumn 2011 easy-to-use tools to guide the sales team in its The team therefore needs an analytic tool work. The tools are often mechanisms for that can systematically identify the value created quantifying the impact of relevant value drivers for the customer by the company’s product and simplifying any calculations the sales versus the next-best alternative. This identifica- team must make. If we consider the example of a tion will come in the form of an assessment company that can deliver a particular product that clearly captures the incremental value faster than a competitor, its sales force must be delivered by the product vis-à-vis competitor able to quantify the value to the client of offerings (Exhibit 1). The tool must be easy MoSCfaster 2 time011 to market in the specific marketplace to use, and its analytic mechanism dynamically Salesinto whichand marketing the product is being sold. A calcu- responsive to the needs of the field. The Exhibitlation of3 suchof 4 specificity can rarely be performed salesperson must be able to enter a few essential in an ad hoc manner by a sales team in the field. variables reflecting the specific interest of any Exhibit 1 Research shows that customers make clear value distinctions for many products. Client product value Next-best alternative (NBA) End device Product value vs NBA, $ Value/NBA 7.55 3.6x Product 1 2.10 7.52 2.6x Product 2 2.90 Product 3 0.90 1.8x 0.50 13.00 1.7x Product 4 7.50 4.10 1.2x Product 5 3.50 Product 6 6.80 1.1x 6.20 9.00 1.0x Product 7 9.00 2.00 1.0x Product 8 2.00 Wide range in value over NBA price Source: Customer interviews; McKinsey analysis Getting customers to say, ‘The price is right!’ 19 MoSC 2011 Sales and marketing Exhibit 4 of 4 Exhibit 2 What customers value differs significantly according to the segment they fall into.
Recommended publications
  • A Brief Primer on the Economics of Targeted Advertising
    ECONOMIC ISSUES A Brief Primer on the Economics of Targeted Advertising by Yan Lau Bureau of Economics Federal Trade Commission January 2020 Federal Trade Commission Joseph J. Simons Chairman Noah Joshua Phillips Commissioner Rohit Chopra Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter Commissioner Christine S. Wilson Commissioner Bureau of Economics Andrew Sweeting Director Andrew E. Stivers Deputy Director for Consumer Protection Alison Oldale Deputy Director for Antitrust Michael G. Vita Deputy Director for Research and Management Janis K. Pappalardo Assistant Director for Consumer Protection David R. Schmidt Assistant Director, Oÿce of Applied Research and Outreach Louis Silva, Jr. Assistant Director for Antitrust Aileen J. Thompson Assistant Director for Antitrust Yan Lau is an economist in the Division of Consumer Protection of the Bureau of Economics at the Federal Trade Commission. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily refect those of the Federal Trade Commission or any individual Commissioner. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank AndrewStivers and Jan Pappalardo for invaluable feedback on numerous revisions of the text, and the BE economists who contributed their thoughts and citations to this paper. iii Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Search Costs and Match Quality 5 3 Marketing Costs and Ad Volume 6 4 Price Discrimination in Uncompetitive Settings 7 5 Market Segmentation in Competitive Setting 9 6 Consumer Concerns about Data Use 9 7 Conclusion 11 References 13 Appendix 16 iv 1 Introduction The internet has grown to touch a large part of our economic and social lives. This growth has transformed it into an important medium for marketers to serve advertising.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Real Estate Presales: a Theoretical Approach [Electronic Version]
    Cornell University School of Hotel Administration The Scholarly Commons Articles and Chapters School of Hotel Administration Collection 2012 The aM rket for Real Estate Presales: A Theoretical Approach Robert Edelstein University of California, Berkeley Peng Liu Cornell University School of Hotel Administration, [email protected] Fang Wu Citadel Asset Management Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles Part of the Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Edelstein, R., Liu, P., & Wu, F. (2012). The market for real estate presales: A theoretical approach [Electronic version]. Retrieved [insert date], from Cornell University, School of Hotel Administration site: http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/1007/ This Article or Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Hotel Administration Collection at The choS larly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles and Chapters by an authorized administrator of The choS larly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aM rket for Real Estate Presales: A Theoretical Approach Abstract Presale agreements have become a pervasive worldwide practice for residential sales, especially in many Asian markets. Although there is a burgeoning empirical literature on presales agreements, only a few papers actually address their theoretical foundations. We create a set of interrelated theoretical models for explaining how and why developers and buyers engage in presale contracts for non-completed residential dwellings. Given heterogeneous consumer beliefs about future market prices, developers and buyers enter into presale agreements to mitigate, two intertwined, fundamental risks: those of real estate market valuation and default. Our analyses are consistent with prior empirical findings and provide additional theoretical insights for understanding the market for presales.
    [Show full text]
  • Premium Brands Holdings Corporation Announces The
    Premium Brands Holdings Corporation announces the acquisition of C&C, the creation of a national protein distribution and trading platform, and a $75 million bought deal of 4.65% convertible unsecured subordinated debentures NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO U.S. NEWS WIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES. The Acquisition Premium Brands Holdings Corporation ("Premium Brands" or the "Company") (TSX:PBH), a leading producer, marketer and distributor of branded specialty food products, is pleased to announce it has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire substantially all of the assets and business undertakings of Montreal based C&C Packing Inc. and its affiliate, Premier Meat Packers (2009) Inc. (collectively “C&C”). The aggregate purchase price, subject to certain customary adjustments, will be approximately $146.0 million, consisting of $102.0 million in cash, the issuance of 514,579 Premium Brands common shares and consideration of $20.0 million which is subject to possible reductions if certain post- acquisition earnings targets are not realized. C&C, with annual sales of approximately $250 million, is a leading supplier of a variety of fresh and frozen meat products to retailers and foodservice distributors across central and eastern Canada. It was founded in 1974 by Mr. Stanley Cons who, along with his two sons Ronnie and Michael, currently own and operate the business. “C&C perfectly complements our protein distribution and trading initiatives in western Canada and, with its strong and experienced management team and state-of-the-art facilities, will enable us to create a unique national platform in another niche market segment,” said Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Loyalty Marketing Strategies
    Essential Strategies for Customer Loyalty Marketing Ignite Guide AN ELEVEN-MINUTE READ INTRODUCTION Deepening customer relationships is key to unlocking revenue potential Loyal customers spend more1. That fact alone should be reason enough for brands to leverage loyalty marketing programs. But the benefits extend far beyond increased revenue—loyalty programs help brands increase customer retention, customer lifetime value (CLTV), brand awareness, and customer satisfaction. They also provide companies with greater opportunities to capture rich first-party customer data. This data not only powers personalized customer experiences but allows for better, more-informed business decisions. In short, loyalty marketing programs should a program that resonates with their customers and What’s inside? be an essential part of every company’s engages with them across all touchpoints, it Customer loyalty marketing, defined 3 customer acquisition and retention strategy. creates an opportunity to become more customer- But many companies are unsure how to launch focused and omnichannel. Build your foundation 5 a loyalty initiative. Five steps to get started 6 This guide will help marketing leaders responsible in customer loyalty marketing From choosing the right type of program to for loyalty, branding, customer relationships, The power of customer 9 determining the level of investment to figuring out and customer retention and acquisition to better loyalty marketing how to promote it to the audience, customer loyalty understand how to deepen customer relationships marketing is a big undertaking—but a worthwhile through loyalty marketing—and how to launch Use Oracle to form deeper 10 connections with your customers one. When brands take the necessary steps to launch and optimize loyalty programs.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Premium Loyalty? • Free Vs
    FREE VS. FEE: WILL CUSTOMERS PAY FOR THE RIGHT PREMIUM LOYALTY PROGRAM? inteqinsights.com VIP, MEMBERSHIP OR PREMIUM LOYALTY PROGRAMS With the abundance of loyalty programs in the market today, it’s no wonder consumers have become immune to offers and incentives. Yet, premium loyalty programs (often called VIP, Membership, or Paid Loyalty) are paving new ground in this mature field. In a tough competitive market, retailers as diverse as Amazon, Restoration Hardware and GameStop are using premium loyalty programs to take customer engagement, customer loyalty and incremental revenue to new heights. WHAT’S INSIDE? • WHAT IS PREMIUM LOYALTY? • FREE VS. FEE • WILL CUSTOMERS PAY FOR LOYALTY? • WITH FREE LOYALTY, WHAT’S THE RISK? • WHO’S DOING PREMIUM LOYALTY WELL? • IS PREMIUM LOYALTY RIGHT FOR YOU? WHAT IS PREMIUM LOYALTY? Just about any time you visit a retailer, you’re asked if you are part of their rewards program. You give the cashier your phone On average, number, acquire points, and eventually, receive a reward in the form of coupons or discounts. households belong to Sign up. Get a Card. Get points. Loyalty progarms are usually that simple. 29 If consumers have loyalty cards or apps for just about every loyalty retailer, is this really loyalty? programs, How do you differentiate your loyalty program and keep your yet are only best customers coming back for more? Enter, premium loyalty. Premium loyalty programs are designed to help brands engage active in their best customers. By providing a premium level of access to experiences, savings and valuable benefits that go beyond what a free loyalty program offers, you integrate your brand into 12 a customer’s everyday life and strengthen the relationship they have with your brand.
    [Show full text]
  • Premium Payback
    PREMIUM PAYBACK Retail Payments Solution Effectively managing your retail payments strategy Consumer Satisfaction means unlocking consumer demand, while lowering Consumers are driven to your store when costs and squeezing every last penny out of revenue. you are identified as a network partner. • 56% of consumers felt FIS Premium PaybackTM will connect your stores with millions of consumers Premium Payback was a better looking to redeem their bank loyalty points as currency at your register. value than other redemption options • Not only does this not cost you anything, but it reduces interchange fees and select retailers may receive additional • 88% of consumers would revenue per transaction by FIS redeem their points again for purchases rebates • Being in the exclusive network will help: • 90% of consumers rated their o Increase brand awareness redemption experience as a four o Generate new demand or five out of five o Increase traffic for new and existing customers 1. Shop 2. Pay 3. Accept Premium Payback works Customers are surprised and A frictionless experience for existing customers and delighted at the checkout POS allows customers to drives new in-store traffic. when given choice to redeem complete a transaction just points for dollars off of the as they would normally do. purchase price. fisglobal.com ©2019 FIS and/or its subsidiaries. All Rights Reserved. Premium Payback: Retail Payments Solution Value to the Client Our Premium Payback network has revolutionized loyalty rewards redemptions. FIS technology has linked millions of payment cards with loyalty programs, enabling redemptions at the point of sale (POS). The network has significantly increased the discretionary spend for bank loyalty members, and they’re looking for new merchants to shop.
    [Show full text]
  • 4-H Premium Sales
    4-H Premium Sales The ultimate goal of 4-H project work is to develop young people. 4-H uses a variety of ways to acknowledge the learning that takes place during participation in the program. Premium sales are held to support this purpose. The following principles should be used when county extension staff work in partnership with local stakeholders to determine how these opportunities are implemented. In the case of 4-H premium sales, important stakeholders may include buyers (or potential buyers), 4-H members and their families, the county 4-H Council or other local adult volunteer leadership groups who work with the event. Prefer local decision-making. It is our expectation that our county extension staff work in partnership with local stakeholders regarding how the program will be implemented. In this case, important stakeholders include buyers (or potential buyers), 4-H members and their families, and the local adult volunteer leadership who works with the event. Auction principles: 4-H youth who complete 4-H projects, particularly those involving livestock and other farm animals, have often had the opportunity to sell their project at an auction that is part of a county and/or state fair or some other event set up for this purpose. In some cases, this has been a long-standing and vital part of the 4-H educational experience. Generally speaking, these auctions have been organized and conducted using practices consistent with auctions for other types of items which include supporting the principles of a free market economy and society. These practices involve the presence of 1) a willing buyer, 2) a willing seller and 3) a price being established by selling the item to the highest bidder.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes a Brand Premium?
    STRETTO / FALL 2019 What Makes a Brand Premium? Article by Doug Briley Like most people, I like nice things. I’ll confess I spend more on my personal wardrobe than many men, and I’m a guy who will spend money on clothes that last and wear them for years instead of cheap stuff I’m constantly replacing. This is my approach when it comes to my personal wardrobe habits, but how does this notion scale for a consumer just like me when it comes to buying groceries? Or a vacation destination? Or a car? Or even family healthcare? Think of this concept invert- bigwigs who too narrowly focus on ued perspective, especially if con- ed: How does this idea apply to the short-term results. I’ve observed sidered alongside the abundance of other guy who spends as little as brands who move units quickly with consumer and profile data available possible on his wardrobe so he has deep discounts, hitting volume or to us today. Might this concept be disposable income for other prior- revenue goals this year, but in the a scalable way to evaluate a brand’s ities? There may be more going on long-term they discount the prod- “premium-ness”, regardless of the here than Mosaic profiles and sim- uct and give it away to consumers brand’s category? This neglected ple segmentation. A careful review who will never pay full price. approach can pave the way for col- of consumer tradeoffs and premi- I get it. We don’t want to restrict orful, outside-the-category ideas ums may be a perspective too often our sales only to the consumers for innovation and consumer ap- overlooked.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Savers Winners: an Overview of Prize-Linked Savings Products
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MAKING SAVERS WINNERS: AN OVERVIEW OF PRIZE-LINKED SAVINGS PRODUCTS Melissa Schettini Kearney Peter Tufano Jonathan Guryan Erik Hurst Working Paper 16433 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16433 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2010 The authors thank colleagues at the D2D Fund, Howell Jackson, Anna Lusardi, Olivia Mitchell and Mike Orszag for beneficial discussions and for their help in conducting the research on which this paper is based. The authors also thank Seth Freedman for his excellent research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2010 by Melissa Schettini Kearney, Peter Tufano, Jonathan Guryan, and Erik Hurst. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Making Savers Winners: An Overview of Prize-Linked Savings Products Melissa Schettini Kearney, Peter Tufano, Jonathan Guryan, and Erik Hurst NBER Working Paper No. 16433 October 2010 JEL No. G21,G28,H30,K3 ABSTRACT For over three centuries and throughout the globe, people have enthusiastically bought savings products that incorporate lottery elements. In lieu of paying traditional interest to all investors proportional to their balances, these Prize Linked Savings (PLS) accounts distribute periodic sizeable payments to some investors using a lottery-like drawing where an investor’s chances of winning are proportional to one’s account balances.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Premium Pricing Strategy a Viable Option to Pursue Higher Revenue Performance? a Case Study of Relative Pricing Strategy in the Singapore Lodging Market
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 6-2010 Is premium pricing strategy a viable option to pursue higher revenue performance? A case study of relative pricing strategy in the Singapore lodging market Xiaorong Chen University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Hospitality Administration and Management Commons, and the Marketing Commons Repository Citation Chen, Xiaorong, "Is premium pricing strategy a viable option to pursue higher revenue performance? A case study of relative pricing strategy in the Singapore lodging market" (2010). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 682. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1910240 This Professional Paper is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Professional Paper in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Professional Paper has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Is premium pricing strategy a viable option
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Compelling Value Proposition Is Not a Linear Process, Nor Is It Easy
    “Take whiskey. Why do some people chose Jack Daniel's, while others choose Grand Dad or Taylor? Have they tried all three and compared the taste? Don't make me laugh. The reality is that these three brands have different images which appeal to different kinds of people. It isn't the whiskey they choose, it's the image. The brand image is 90 percent of what the distiller has to sell. Give people a taste of Old Crow, and tell them it's Old Crow. Then give them another taste of Old Crow, but tell them it's Jack Daniel's. Ask them which they prefer. They'll think the two drinks are quite different. They are tasting images.” – David Ogilvy You Already Love Value Propositions Let’s say you’re invited to a dinner party. What would you bring with you? Chocolate? Wine? Flowers? Cheese? I bet you can imagine how each of those would work. But imagine if you asked your housemate to pick these up from the shops, and they returned with four blocks of cooking chocolate, a cask of white wine, a small fern, and a 1kg block of low fat tasty cheese. It’s safe to say that you’d be annoyed. These are useless - well, not useless, they’re all great value. But you weren’t after value. I’d argue that almost all of our purchases follow this pattern. You were wanting to look sophisticated. We are driven by deep priorities – aspirations, indulgences, If you’re honest, it was never about the items themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Marketing: Past, Present, and Future Johanna Gummerus, Catharina Von Koskull and Christian Kowalkowski
    Relationship marketing: Past, present, and future Johanna Gummerus, Catharina von Koskull and Christian Kowalkowski The self-archived postprint version of this journal article is available at Linköping University Institutional Repository (DiVA): http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-142215 N.B.: When citing this work, cite the original publication. Gummerus, J., von Koskull, C., Kowalkowski, C., (2017), Relationship marketing: Past, present, and future, Journal of Services Marketing, 31(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-12-2016-0424 Original publication available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-12-2016-0424 Copyright: Emerald http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ Relationship Marketing: Past, Present and Future Johanna Gummerus, Department of Marketing, CERS – Centre for Relationship Marketing and Service Management, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland Catharina von Koskull, Department of Marketing, University of Vaasa, Helsinki, Finland Christian Kowalkowski, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden and Department of Marketing, CERS – Centre for Relationship Marketing and Service Management, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland Abstract Purpose: In a time when relationships have become recognized as an integral part of contemporary marketing theory and practice, what role can the sub-discipline of relationship marketing play? The aim with this special issue is to critically assess the state of relationship marketing and call for new ideas to take the field forward. Design/methodology/approach: We had an open call for papers with an original perspective and advanced thinking on relationship marketing, resulting in 50 originally submitted manuscripts that were subjected to double-blind review. Of these, this issue presents five articles.
    [Show full text]