DOCSLIB.ORG

Some Basics of Algebraic K-Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Some Basics of Algebraic K-Theory SOME BASICS OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY AARON LANDESMAN 1. INTRODUCTION:ALGEBRAIC AND TOPOLOGICAL K THEORY In this paper, we explore the basics of algebraic K-theory, with a focus on the K-theory of schemes. As the purpose is to explore K theory, we take foundational results in scheme theory and commu- tative algebra for granted. We mainly follow [Wei, Sections II.6, II.7, II.8]. In this paper, we stick to the case of K0(•), and do not discuss higher K-groups. One reason for this is that K0(•) was historically the first K-group examined, and there are many interesting topics to cover before looking at higher K-groups. After defining K-theory as the Grothendieck group of coherent sheaves on a scheme, we give some examples to show subtleties which can occur in the world of algebraic K-theory, which do not occur in the land of topolog- ical K-theory, such as the failure of exact sequences to split. We then discuss the techniques of devissage´ and localization, and use these to compute the K-theory of projective space. Finally, we dis- cuss the K-theory of curves X over a field, showing that they satisfy ∼ 0 K0(X) = H (X, Z) ⊕ Pic X. Remark 1.1 (An advanced relation between algebraic and topolog- ical K-theory). Before continuing with the body of the paper, we pause to mention a very deep relationship between algebraic and topological K-theory, far beyond the scope of this paper. Loosely speaking, suppose X is a separated regular Noetherian scheme with ` invertible. Then, there exists a certain element β in the second K- group of X (depending upon `), known as the Bott element, so that if one takes the algebraic K-theory of X and inverts β, one obtains the topological K-theory. This is described in [Tho85, p. 1]. Many remarks in this paper are aimed at a reader familiar with topological K-theory, though no background in topological K-theory is assumed. 1.1. Acknowledgements. I thank Peter Kronheimer for teaching the course on topological K-theory, which prompted this paper. I thank 1 2 AARON LANDESMAN Inna Zakharevich for suggesting this topic. I thank Akhil Matthew for answering several questions. I thank Peter Landesman for help- ful comments. 1.2. Two Candidates for algebraic K-theory. In this section, we de- scribe two K-theory like groups on a scheme X, (1)G 0(X), which encapsulates all coherent sheaves, (2) and K0(X), which encapsulates all vector bundles. We see in Theorem 1.13 that these agree in nice situations. While the vector bundle theory is more true to topological K-theory, the coherent sheaf theory is sometimes nicer. For example, the coherent sheaf K-theory of a scheme agrees with the coherent sheaf K-theory of its reduction, as shown in Corollary 2.2, and so coherent sheaf K-theory only depends on the reduced scheme structure, and “does not see nilpotents.” This will motivate our definitions for algebraic K-theory. In order to define a sort of K-theory in terms of coherent sheaves, we introduce the Grothendieck group. Definition 1.2. Let A be an abelian category. Define the Grothendieck group of A, notated K0(A) as the abelian group with generators [A] for A 2 A an object, and with relations [A] = A0 + A00 where A, A0, A00 2 A are objects in an exact sequence (1.1) 0 A0 A A00 0. Warning 1.3. We will often abuse notation by writing [A] 2 K0(A) simply as A, when it is understood to lie in K0(A) and not A. Start by recalling the definition of topological K-theory. Example 1.4. In the setting of topological K-theory, if X is a topolog- ical space, and Vect(X) is the category of vector bundles on X, then K0(Vect(X)) is what one would usually call K0(X). Definition 1.5. Let X be scheme and let CohShf(X) denote the cate- gory of coherent sheaves on X. Then, define G0(X) := K0(CohShf(X)) to be the Grothendieck group of CohShf(X). To make the connection to topological K-theory, we’d like to un- derstand what the category of all coherent sheaves has to do with the category of vector bundles. Unfortunately, the Grothendieck group SOME BASICS OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY 3 of an abelian category is not enough to define a K-theory for vector bundles, (or equivalently, a K-theory for invertible sheaves,) since vector bundles do not form an abelian category, as we now explain. Remark 1.6. The reason that we have to define K0(X) for a gen- eral exact category instead of an abelian category is that locally free sheaves on schemes do not form an abelian category. The only ax- iom of an abelian category they fail to satisfy is that they are not closed under cokernels. This failure is already seen in the case of 1 Ak := Spec k[t], for k a field, as evidenced by the exact sequence of modules on k[t] ×t (1.2) 0 k[t] k[t] k[t]/t · k[t] 0 Of course, here the first two sheaves are the trivial sheaf, but their cokernel is nonzero and torsion, hence not locally free. Our next aim is to define K0(X), which will essentially be the ana- log of G0(X) for invertible sheaves, but first we define exact cate- gories, to set up the construction in more generality. Definition 1.7. Let A be an abelian category let C be a full subcate- gory, and let E be a collection of sequences in C (1.3) 0 B C D 0. We say (C, E) is an exact category if (1) E is the collection of all exact sequences as above which are exact in A. (2) C is closed under extensions. We say C is an exact category when E is understood. Lemma 1.8. Let X be a scheme, let CohShf(X) denote the category of coher- ent sheaves on X, and let LocFreeShf(X) denote the category of locally free sheaves on X. Then, LocFreeShf(X) ⊂ CohShf(X) is an exact subcategory. Proof. We verify the two properties of the definition of exact category. A sequence of locally free sheaves is exact if and only if it is exact as a sequence of sheaves, so the first property is satisfied. If we have a sequence of sheaves (1.4) 0 F G H 0 with F, H both locally free, we claim G is locally free. Indeed, to check this, it suffices to check it at each stalk, in which case we may assume that we are working with modules over a local ring, and 4 AARON LANDESMAN we want to show an extension of free modules is free. Indeed, this follows, since if we have (1.5) 0 M N P 0 with M and P free, then N is a free module as well, since N is gen- erated by the lifts of generators of P together with the images of the generators of M. Definition 1.9 (A generalization of Definition 1.2 to exact subcate- gories). Let C be small exact category. Then K0(C) is the abelian group generated by objects C for C 2 C, with relations [C] = [B] + [D] for each exact sequence (1.6) 0 B C D 0 with B, C, D 2 C. We can now define K0(X), for X a scheme. Definition 1.10. Let X be a scheme, and let LocFreeShf(X) denote the category of locally free sheaves on X. Then, we define K0(X) := K0(LocFreeShf(X)). Remark 1.11. One might ask why we define K0(•) in terms of exact sequences instead of just saying that [A ⊕ B] = [A] + [B]. Indeed, the problem is that not all exact sequences of coherent sheaves split. Indeed, even not all exact sequences of locally free sheaves split. As a simple example, for E an elliptic curve, over a field k, there is a nontrivial extension (1.7) 0 OE F OE 0 since extensions are classified by Ext1 and 1 ∼ 1 ∼ ExtE(OE, OE) = H (E, OE) = k 6= 0. 1.3. The Cartan map is an isomorphism in nice situations. We’d ∼ like to know whether K0(X) = G0(X). To start, we introduce a natu- ral map between them. Definition 1.12. Let X be a scheme. Define the Cartan map Cartan : K0(X) G0(X) ! SOME BASICS OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY 5 to be the map induced via the universal property of group comple- tion by the map of monoids LocFreeShf(X) G0(X) F 7 [F] , ! where [F] denotes the class of the coherent sheaf F in G0(X). ! At this point, we will begin to use some heavy machinery from scheme theory. Even to establish one of the most foundational the- orems, Theorem 1.13, we will need to assume the fairly technical Serre’s theorem on cohomological dimension, stating that any mod- ule on a regular ring has finite projective dimension. Theorem 1.13. Let X be a separated regular Noetherian. Then the Cartan ∼ homomorphism Cartan : G0(X) = K0(X) is an isomorphism. Proof. First, using some fairly technical scheme theory every coher- ent sheaf on a regular separated Noetherian scheme admits a sur- jective map from a locally free sheaf, and further has a finite such resolution, as follows from [BGI71, II.2.2.3, II.2.2.7.1].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California State University, Northridge Torsion
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE TORSION CLASSES OF COHERENT SHEAVES ON AN ELLIPTIC OR PRODUCT THREEFOLD A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mathematics By Jeremy Keat-Wah Khoo August 2020 The thesis of Jeremy Keat-Wah Khoo is approved: Katherine Stevenson, Ph.D. Date Jerry D. Rosen, Ph.D. Date Jason Lo, Ph.D., Chair Date California State University, Northridge ii Table of Contents Signature page ii Abstract iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Our Methods . .1 1.2 Main Results . .2 2 Background Concepts 3 2.1 Concepts from Homological Algebra and Category Theory . .3 2.2 Concepts from Algebraic Geometry . .8 2.3 Concepts from Scheme theory . 10 3 Main Definitions and “Axioms” 13 3.1 The Variety X ................................. 13 3.2 Supports of Coherent Sheaves . 13 3.3 Dimension Subcategories of AX ....................... 14 3.4 Torsion Pairs . 14 3.5 The Relative Fourier-Mukai Transforms Φ; Φ^ ................ 15 3.6 The Product Threefold and Chern Classes . 16 4 Preliminary Results 18 5 Properties Characterizing Tij 23 6 Generating More Torsion Classes 30 6.1 Generalizing Lemma 4.2 . 30 6.2 “Second Generation” Torsion Classes . 34 7 The Torsion Class hC00;C20i 39 References 42 iii ABSTRACT TORSION CLASSES OF COHERENT SHEAVES ON AN ELLIPTIC OR PRODUCT THREEFOLD By Jeremy Keat-Wah Khoo Master of Science in Mathematics Let X be an elliptic threefold admitting a Weierstrass elliptic fibration. We extend the main results of Angeles, Lo, and Van Der Linden in [1] by providing explicit properties charac- terizing the coherent sheaves contained in the torsion classes constructed there.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics 1
    Mathematics 1 MAA 4103 Introduction to Advanced Calculus for Engineers and Physical MATHEMATICS Scientists 2 3 Credits Grading Scheme: Letter Grade Not all courses are offered every semester. Refer to the schedule of Continues the advanced calculus for engineers and physical scientists courses for each term's specific offerings. sequence. Theory of integration, transcendental functions and infinite More Info (http://registrar.ufl.edu/soc/) series. MAA 4102 is not recommended for those who plan to do graduate work in mathematics; these students should take MAA 4212. Credit will Unless otherwise indicated in the course description, all courses at the be given for, at most, one of MAA 4103, MAA 4212 and MAA 5105. University of Florida are taught in English, with the exception of specific Prerequisite: MAA 4102 with minimum grade of C. foreign language courses. MAA 4211 Advanced Calculus 1 3 Credits Department Information Grading Scheme: Letter Grade Advanced treatment of limits, differentiation, integration and series. Graduates from the Department of Mathematics might take a job Includes calculus of functions of several variables. Credit will be given for, that uses their math major in an area like statistics, biomathematics, at most, one of MAA 4211, MAA 4102 and MAA 5104. operations research, actuarial science, mathematical modeling, Prerequisite: MAS 4105 with minimum grade of C. cryptography, or mathematics education. Or they might continue into graduate school leading to a research career. Professional schools in MAA 4212 Advanced Calculus 2 3 Credits business, law, and medicine appreciate mathematics majors because of Grading Scheme: Letter Grade the analytical and problem solving skills developed in the math courses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jouanolou-Thomason Homotopy Lemma
    The Jouanolou-Thomason homotopy lemma Aravind Asok February 9, 2009 1 Introduction The goal of this note is to prove what is now known as the Jouanolou-Thomason homotopy lemma or simply \Jouanolou's trick." Our main reason for discussing this here is that i) most statements (that I have seen) assume unncessary quasi-projectivity hypotheses, and ii) most applications of the result that I know (e.g., in homotopy K-theory) appeal to the result as merely a \black box," while the proof indicates that the construction is quite geometric and relatively explicit. For simplicity, throughout the word scheme means separated Noetherian scheme. Theorem 1.1 (Jouanolou-Thomason homotopy lemma). Given a smooth scheme X over a regular Noetherian base ring k, there exists a pair (X;~ π), where X~ is an affine scheme, smooth over k, and π : X~ ! X is a Zariski locally trivial smooth morphism with fibers isomorphic to affine spaces. 1 Remark 1.2. In terms of an A -homotopy category of smooth schemes over k (e.g., H(k) or H´et(k); see [MV99, x3]), the map π is an A1-weak equivalence (use [MV99, x3 Example 2.4]. Thus, up to A1-weak equivalence, any smooth k-scheme is an affine scheme smooth over k. 2 An explicit algebraic form Let An denote affine space over Spec Z. Let An n 0 denote the scheme quasi-affine and smooth over 2m Spec Z obtained by removing the fiber over 0. Let Q2m−1 denote the closed subscheme of A (with coordinates x1; : : : ; x2m) defined by the equation X xixm+i = 1: i Consider the following simple situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Math 615: Lecture of April 16, 2007 We Next Note the Following Fact
    Math 615: Lecture of April 16, 2007 We next note the following fact: n Proposition. Let R be any ring and F = R a free module. If f1, . , fn ∈ F generate F , then f1, . , fn is a free basis for F . n n Proof. We have a surjection R F that maps ei ∈ R to fi. Call the kernel N. Since F is free, the map splits, and we have Rn =∼ F ⊕ N. Then N is a homomorphic image of Rn, and so is finitely generated. If N 6= 0, we may preserve this while localizing at a suitable maximal ideal m of R. We may therefore assume that (R, m, K) is quasilocal. Now apply n ∼ n K ⊗R . We find that K = K ⊕ N/mN. Thus, N = mN, and so N = 0. The final step in our variant proof of the Hilbert syzygy theorem is the following: Lemma. Let R = K[x1, . , xn] be a polynomial ring over a field K, let F be a free R- module with ordered free basis e1, . , es, and fix any monomial order on F . Let M ⊆ F be such that in(M) is generated by a subset of e1, . , es, i.e., such that M has a Gr¨obner basis whose initial terms are a subset of e1, . , es. Then M and F/M are R-free. Proof. Let S be the subset of e1, . , es generating in(M), and suppose that S has r ∼ s−r elements. Let T = {e1, . , es} − S, which has s − r elements. Let G = R be the free submodule of F spanned by T .
    [Show full text]
  • X → S Be a Proper Morphism of Locally Noetherian Schemes and Let F Be a Coherent Sheaf on X That Is flat Over S (E.G., F Is Smooth and F Is a Vector Bundle)
    COHOMOLOGY AND BASE CHANGE FOR ALGEBRAIC STACKS JACK HALL Abstract. We prove that cohomology and base change holds for algebraic stacks, generalizing work of Brochard in the tame case. We also show that Hom-spaces on algebraic stacks are represented by abelian cones, generaliz- ing results of Grothendieck, Brochard, Olsson, Lieblich, and Roth{Starr. To accomplish all of this, we prove that a wide class of relative Ext-functors in algebraic geometry are coherent (in the sense of M. Auslander). Introduction Let f : X ! S be a proper morphism of locally noetherian schemes and let F be a coherent sheaf on X that is flat over S (e.g., f is smooth and F is a vector bundle). If s 2 S is a point, then define Xs to be the fiber of f over s. If s has residue field κ(s), then for each integer q there is a natural base change morphism of κ(s)-vector spaces q q q b (s):(R f∗F) ⊗OS κ(s) ! H (Xs; FXs ): Cohomology and Base Change originally appeared in [EGA, III.7.7.5] in a quite sophisticated form. Mumford [Mum70, xII.5] and Hartshorne [Har77, xIII.12], how- ever, were responsible for popularizing a version similar to the following. Let s 2 S and let q be an integer. (1) The following are equivalent. (a) The morphism bq(s) is surjective. (b) There exists an open neighbourhood U of s such that bq(u) is an iso- morphism for all u 2 U. (c) There exists an open neighbourhood U of s, a coherent OU -module Q, and an isomorphism of functors: Rq+1(f ) (F ⊗ f ∗ I) =∼ Hom (Q; I); U ∗ XU OXU U OU where fU : XU ! U is the pullback of f along U ⊆ S.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCAL PROPERTIES of GOOD MODULI SPACES We Address The
    LOCAL PROPERTIES OF GOOD MODULI SPACES JAROD ALPER ABSTRACT. We study the local properties of Artin stacks and their good moduli spaces, if they exist. We show that near closed points with linearly reductive stabilizer, Artin stacks formally locally admit good moduli spaces. In particular, the geometric invariant theory is developed for actions of linearly reductive group schemes on formal affine schemes. We also give conditions for when the existence of good moduli spaces can be deduced from the existence of etale´ charts admitting good moduli spaces. 1. INTRODUCTION We address the question of whether good moduli spaces for an Artin stack can be constructed “locally.” The main results of this paper are: (1) good moduli spaces ex- ist formally locally around points with linearly reductive stabilizer and (2) sufficient conditions are given for the Zariski-local existence of good moduli spaces given the etale-local´ existence of good moduli spaces. We envision that these results may be of use to construct moduli schemes of Artin stacks without the classical use of geometric invariant theory and semi-stability computations. The notion of a good moduli space was introduced in [1] to assign a scheme or algebraic space to Artin stacks with nice geometric properties reminiscent of Mumford’s good GIT quotients. While good moduli spaces cannot be expected to distinguish between all points of the stack, they do parameterize points up to orbit closure equivalence. See Section 2 for the precise definition of a good moduli space and for a summary of its properties. While the paper [1] systematically develops the properties of good moduli spaces, the existence was only proved in certain cases.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTES on CARTIER and WEIL DIVISORS Recall: Definition 0.1. A
    NOTES ON CARTIER AND WEIL DIVISORS AKHIL MATHEW Abstract. These are notes on divisors from Ravi Vakil's book [2] on scheme theory that I prepared for the Foundations of Algebraic Geometry seminar at Harvard. Most of it is a rewrite of chapter 15 in Vakil's book, and the originality of these notes lies in the mistakes. I learned some of this from [1] though. Recall: Definition 0.1. A line bundle on a ringed space X (e.g. a scheme) is a locally free sheaf of rank one. The group of isomorphism classes of line bundles is called the Picard group and is denoted Pic(X). Here is a standard source of line bundles. 1. The twisting sheaf 1.1. Twisting in general. Let R be a graded ring, R = R0 ⊕ R1 ⊕ ::: . We have discussed the construction of the scheme ProjR. Let us now briefly explain the following additional construction (which will be covered in more detail tomorrow). L Let M = Mn be a graded R-module. Definition 1.1. We define the sheaf Mf on ProjR as follows. On the basic open set D(f) = SpecR(f) ⊂ ProjR, we consider the sheaf associated to the R(f)-module M(f). It can be checked easily that these sheaves glue on D(f) \ D(g) = D(fg) and become a quasi-coherent sheaf Mf on ProjR. Clearly, the association M ! Mf is a functor from graded R-modules to quasi- coherent sheaves on ProjR. (For R reasonable, it is in fact essentially an equiva- lence, though we shall not need this.) We now set a bit of notation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scheme of Monogenic Generators and Its Twists
    THE SCHEME OF MONOGENIC GENERATORS AND ITS TWISTS SARAH ARPIN, SEBASTIAN BOZLEE, LEO HERR, HANSON SMITH Abstract. Given an extension of algebras B/A, when is B generated by a M single element θ ∈ B over A? We show there is a scheme B/A parameterizing the choice of a generator θ ∈ B, a “moduli space” of generators. This scheme relates naturally to Hilbert schemes and configuration spaces. We give explicit equations and ample examples. M A choice of a generator θ is a point of the scheme B/A. This inspires a local-to-global study of monogeneity, piecing together monogenerators over points, completions, open sets, and so on. Local generators may not come from global ones, but they often glue to twisted monogenerators that we de- fine. We show a number ring has class number one if and only if each twisted monogenerator is in fact a global generator θ. The moduli spaces of various M twisted monogenerators are either a Proj or stack quotient of B/A by natural symmetries. The various moduli spaces defined can be used to apply cohomo- logical tools and other geometric methods for finding rational points to the classical problem of monogenic algebra extensions. Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Twists 3 1.2. Summary of the paper 4 1.3. Guide to notions of “Monogeneity” 4 1.4. Summary of Previous Results 5 1.5. Acknowledgements 6 2. The Scheme of Monogenic Generators 7 2.1. Functoriality of MX 10 2.2. Relation to the Hilbert Scheme 12 M arXiv:2108.07185v1 [math.AG] 16 Aug 2021 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2002.10139V1 [Math.AC]
    SOME RESULTS ON PURE IDEALS AND TRACE IDEALS OF PROJECTIVE MODULES ABOLFAZL TARIZADEH Abstract. Let R be a commutative ring with the unit element. It is shown that an ideal I in R is pure if and only if Ann(f)+I = R for all f ∈ I. If J is the trace of a projective R-module M, we prove that J is generated by the “coordinates” of M and JM = M. These lead to a few new results and alternative proofs for some known results. 1. Introduction and Preliminaries The concept of the trace ideals of modules has been the subject of research by some mathematicians around late 50’s until late 70’s and has again been active in recent years (see, e.g. [3], [5], [7], [8], [9], [11], [18] and [19]). This paper deals with some results on the trace ideals of projective modules. We begin with a few results on pure ideals which are used in their comparison with trace ideals in the sequel. After a few preliminaries in the present section, in section 2 a new characterization of pure ideals is given (Theorem 2.1) which is followed by some corol- laries. Section 3 is devoted to the trace ideal of projective modules. Theorem 3.1 gives a characterization of the trace ideal of a projective module in terms of the ideal generated by the “coordinates” of the ele- ments of the module. This characterization enables us to deduce some new results on the trace ideal of projective modules like the statement arXiv:2002.10139v2 [math.AC] 13 Jul 2021 on the trace ideal of the tensor product of two modules for which one of them is projective (Corollary 3.6), and some alternative proofs for a few known results such as Corollary 3.5 which shows that the trace ideal of a projective module is a pure ideal.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1307.5568V2 [Math.AG]
    PARTIAL POSITIVITY: GEOMETRY AND COHOMOLOGY OF q-AMPLE LINE BUNDLES DANIEL GREB AND ALEX KURONYA¨ To Rob Lazarsfeld on the occasion of his 60th birthday Abstract. We give an overview of partial positivity conditions for line bundles, mostly from a cohomological point of view. Although the current work is to a large extent of expository nature, we present some minor improvements over the existing literature and a new result: a Kodaira-type vanishing theorem for effective q-ample Du Bois divisors and log canonical pairs. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Overview of the theory of q-ample line bundles 4 2.1. Vanishing of cohomology groups and partial ampleness 4 2.2. Basic properties of q-ampleness 7 2.3. Sommese’s geometric q-ampleness 15 2.4. Ample subschemes, and a Lefschetz hyperplane theorem for q-ample divisors 17 3. q-Kodaira vanishing for Du Bois divisors and log canonical pairs 19 References 23 1. Introduction Ampleness is one of the central notions of algebraic geometry, possessing the extremely useful feature that it has geometric, numerical, and cohomological characterizations. Here we will concentrate on its cohomological side. The fundamental result in this direction is the theorem of Cartan–Serre–Grothendieck (see [Laz04, Theorem 1.2.6]): for a complete arXiv:1307.5568v2 [math.AG] 23 Jan 2014 projective scheme X, and a line bundle L on X, the following are equivalent to L being ample: ⊗m (1) There exists a positive integer m0 = m0(X, L) such that L is very ample for all m ≥ m0. (2) For every coherent sheaf F on X, there exists a positive integer m1 = m1(X, F, L) ⊗m for which F ⊗ L is globally generated for all m ≥ m1.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Topological K-Theory Shortly After Grothendieck Introduced K0(X)
    3. Topological K-theory Shortly after Grothendieck introduced K0(X) for an algebraic variety X, M. Atiyah and F. Hirzebrch introduced the analogous theory for topological spaces ∗ [2] based on topological vector bundles. We consider this theory Ktop(−) for two reasons: first, the theory developed by Atiyah and Hirzebruch has been a model for 40 years of effort in algebraic K-theory, effort that has recently produced significant advances; second, topological K-theory of the underlying analytic space of a com- plex variety X, Xan, provides a much more computable theory to which algebraic K-theory maps. A (complex) topological vector bundle of rank r, p : E → T , on a space T is a continuous map with fibers each given the structure of a complex vector space of dimension r such that there is an open covering {Ui ⊂ T } with the property that r ∼ there exist homeomorphisms φi : C ×Ui → E|Ui over Ui which are C-linear on each fiber. One readily verifies that such a topological vector bundle p : E → T , on T of rank r determines and is determined by patching data: a collection of continuous, fiber-wise linear homemorphisms for each i, j −1 r r φj ◦ φi = θi,j : C × (Ui ∩ Uj) ' (E|Ui )Uj = (E|Uj )Ui ' C × (Ui ∩ Uj). This in turn is equivalent to a 1-cocycle 1 {θi,j ∈ Mapscont(Ui,j, GL(r, C))} ∈ Z (T, GL(r, C)). Indeed, two such 1-cocycles determine isomorphic topological vector bundles if and only if they differ by a co-boundary. Thus, the topological vector bundles on T of rank r are “classified” by H1(T, GL(r, C)).
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Coherent Sheaves Definition 4.1. If (X,O X) Is a Locally Ringed Space
    4. Coherent Sheaves Definition 4.1. If (X; OX ) is a locally ringed space, then we say that an OX -module F is locally free if there is an open affine cover fUig of X such that FjUi is isomorphic to a direct sum of copies of OUi . If the number of copies r is finite and constant, then F is called locally free of rank r (aka a vector bundle). If F is locally free of rank one then we way say that F is invertible (aka a line bundle). The group of all invertible sheaves under tensor product, denoted Pic(X), is called the Picard group of X. A sheaf of ideals I is any OX -submodule of OX . Definition 4.2. Let X = Spec A be an affine scheme and let M be an A-module. M~ is the sheaf which assigns to every open subset U ⊂ X, the set of functions a s: U −! Mp; p2U which can be locally represented at p as a=g, a 2 M, g 2 R, p 2= Ug ⊂ U. Lemma 4.3. Let A be a ring and let M be an A-module. Let X = Spec A. ~ (1) M is a OX -module. ~ (2) If p 2 X then Mp is isomorphic to Mp. ~ (3) If f 2 A then M(Uf ) is isomorphic to Mf . Proof. (1) is clear and the rest is proved mutatis mutandis as for the structure sheaf. Definition 4.4. An OX -module F on a scheme X is called quasi- coherent if there is an open cover fUi = Spec Aig by affines and ~ isomorphisms FjUi ' Mi, where Mi is an Ai-module.
    [Show full text]