DOCSLIB.ORG

An Improved Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Charged Current Quasi-Elastic Cross-Section on Hydrocarbon at Minerva

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Improved Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Charged Current Quasi-Elastic Cross-Section on Hydrocarbon at Minerva W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects Fall 2016 An improved measurement of the Muon Neutrino charged current Quasi-Elastic cross-section on Hydrocarbon at Minerva Dun Zhang College of William and Mary - Arts & Sciences, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Zhang, Dun, "An improved measurement of the Muon Neutrino charged current Quasi-Elastic cross- section on Hydrocarbon at Minerva" (2016). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1499450044. http://doi.org/10.21220/S2Q077 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Improved Measurement of the Muon Neutrino Charged Current Quasi-Elastic Cross-Section on Hydrocarbon at MINERνA Dun Zhang Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China Master of Science, College of William & Mary, 2009 Bachelor of Science, University of Science and Technology of China, 2007 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of The College of William & Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Physics College of William & Mary May 2017 c 2017 Dun Zhang All rights reserved. ABSTRACT Long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments measure the flavor and energy of neutrinos to determine the neutrino mass spectrum and mixing parameters (the PMNS matrix). The flavor of a neutrino is determined by identifying the lepton in the final state of a charged current (CC) interaction. The energy is most generally determined by summing the energy of the lepton and hadronic recoil system. At energies below the pion production threshold, the dominant reaction is quasi-elastic (QE) scattering — ν n l−p. This process is advantageous because the neutrino energy can be l → determined from knowledge of the incoming neutrino’s angle, and the energy and angle of the outgoing lepton. At energies above the pion production threshold QE scattering gradually becomes less important but serves as a standard candle for oscillation experiments, at least in principle. In practice, oscillation experiments are made of heavy nuclei (C, Fe, Ar) so the QE process occurs on nucleons that are embedded in the nuclear environment. Predictions of the QE cross-section suffer from significant uncertainties due to our understanding of that nuclear environment and the way it is probed by the weak interaction. This thesis improves knowledge of the CCQE process by presenting measurements of the differential cross-section (dσ/dQ2) for scattering on hydrocarbon. The data comes from MINERνA, a dedicated neutrino-scattering experiment based at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab). Neutrinos are provided to the experiment by the Neutrinos at the Main Injector (NuMI) neutrino beam. The data used in this thesis were taken between March 2010 and April 2012 in the “low energy” beam configuration that has previously been used to measure the CCQE cross-section [1]. The measurement technique has been improved in this thesis in a few ways. First, the inelastic background to CCQE was reduced by identifying the “Michel electron” produced by the π+ µ+ e+ decay chain. Additionally an updated neutrino flux was used to extract → → the cross-section and estimates for some sources of systematic uncertainty have been improved. The measured cross-section is compared to several theoretical models and the effect that the signal definition (“CCQE” vs “CCQE-like”) has on the measurement is also explored. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments..................................... vi Dedication......................................... vii ListofTables....................................... viii ListofFigures ...................................... xi CHAPTER 1 1 Introduction.................................... 2 1.1 TheStandardModel ............................ 3 1.1.1 FundamentalParticles . 4 1.1.2 FundamentalInteractions . 5 1.2 NeutrinoOscillations ............................ 6 1.3 NeutrinoQuasi-ElasticScattering . ... 10 1.3.1 IntroductiontoElasticScattering . .. 11 1.3.2 Neutrino Charged Current Quasi-Elastic Scattering . ...... 13 1.4 NuclearEffects ............................... 20 1.5 Motivation to Remeasure the Cross-section . ..... 24 2 The NuMI Beamline and The MINERνADetector............... 25 2.1 TheNuMIBeamline ............................ 25 2.1.1 TheProtonBeam.......................... 26 2.1.2 TheNeutrinoBeam......................... 27 2.2 The MINERνADetector .......................... 33 2.2.1 InnerDetector............................ 36 i 2.2.2 OuterDetector ........................... 40 2.2.3 UpstreamRegion .......................... 41 2.2.4 TheScintillatorStrips . 42 2.2.5 ThePhotomultiplierTubes. 43 2.2.6 Readout Electronics and the Data Acquisition System . .... 43 2.2.7 MINOSDetector .......................... 45 3 Calibration and Reconstruction in MINERνA ................. 48 3.1 Calibration.................................. 49 3.1.1 Ex situ Calibration ......................... 51 3.1.2 In situ Calibration......................... 52 3.2 Reconstruction ............................... 60 3.2.1 TimeSliceReconstruction. 60 3.2.2 ClusterFormation. 62 3.2.3 TrackFormation .......................... 63 3.2.4 VertexFitting............................ 66 3.2.5 Track-BasedEventBuilding . 67 3.2.6 MuonReconstruction. 69 3.2.7 RecoilSystemReconstruction . 70 4 Simulation..................................... 73 4.1 BeamSimulation .............................. 73 4.2 NeutrinoInteractionsSimulation. ... 78 4.2.1 Cross-sectionModels . 78 4.2.2 NuclearMediumModeling . 82 4.2.3 FinalStateInteractions. 83 4.3 SimulatingEventsintheDetector . .. 84 ii 5 MuonTagging................................... 86 5.1 MuonandMichelElectron . 86 5.1.1 Muons in the MINERνADetector................. 91 5.1.2 MichelElectronProperties . 93 5.2 MichelTool.................................. 95 5.2.1 SearchStage............................. 95 5.2.2 ReconstructionStage . 103 5.2.3 Characterizing the MichelTool UsingStoppingMuons . 105 5.3 ToolPerformanceMonitoring . 116 5.3.1 Characterizing Rock Muon Samples Used in the Study . 117 5.3.2 EfficiencyandPurity . 123 5.3.3 Uncertainty ............................. 124 5.3.4 Tagging Probability and Efficiency Stability Check . 125 5.3.5 Discussion on the Efficiency of the MichelTool . 136 5.4 MichelElectronsBackgroundStudy . 137 5.4.1 Methodology ............................ 137 5.4.2 MisidentificationRateandUncertainty . 141 5.4.3 Cleaning Selections on Michel Electrons. 141 6 Analysis ...................................... 147 6.1 AnalysisOverview.............................. 147 6.2 EventCandidatesSelection. 148 6.2.1 MuonSelection ........................... 148 6.2.2 CCQE-likeSelection . 149 6.2.3 SelectedCCQE-likeEventCandidates. 154 6.3 Cross-SectionExtraction . 158 iii 6.3.1 BackgroundSubtraction . 160 6.3.2 BinMigrationandUnfolding. 167 6.3.3 EfficiencyandAcceptanceCorrections . 169 6.3.4 Normalization ............................ 171 6.3.5 Final Differential Cross-section Results of CCQE-like Analysis . 172 6.3.6 Comparing to the Previous Published Result . 174 6.3.7 CCQE/CCQE-like Analyses Using the New Flux. 180 6.4 SystematicUncertainties . 187 6.4.1 NeutrinoFlux............................ 189 6.4.2 EventGeneratorUncertainties . 192 6.4.3 DetectorResponseUncertainties. 201 6.4.4 OtherSystematicUncertainties . 212 6.5 SystematicErrorsSummary . 215 6.5.1 SystematicErrorsSummaryPlots . 215 6.5.2 SystematicErrorSummaryTables. 231 7 Conclusions .................................... 240 7.1 Model Comparisons of the Differential Cross-sections . ........ 240 7.2 Conclusions ................................. 246 APPENDIX A AdditionalPlotsintheCCQEAnalysis. 248 A.1 Cross-sectionExtraction . 248 A.1.1 BackgroundSubtraction . 249 A.1.2 BinMigrationandUnfolding. 255 A.1.3 EfficiencyandAcceptanceCorrections . 256 A.2 SystematicEstimation . 258 A.2.1 SummaryofTotalErrors. 258 iv A.2.2 GroupofFlux............................ 259 A.2.3 GroupofPrimaryInteraction . 260 A.2.4 GroupofHadronInteraction. 261 A.2.5 GroupofMuonReconstruction . 262 A.2.6 GroupofRecoilReconstruction . 263 A.2.7 GroupofOtherErrors . 264 A.2.8 SystematicErrorsTables . 265 APPENDIX B The MichelTool Pseudo-code ............................ 270 Bibliography ....................................... 273 Vita ............................................ 279 v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Michael Kordosky, for his guidance through more than seven years of research. Without his professional great help and patience, I could not reach this far. I also want to express appreciation to those who have helped me and contributed to my research including Laura Fields, Arturo Fiorentini, and Jyotsna Osta. In particular, I must thank Minerba Betancourt, who is extremely patient and willing to help all the time. To my family, Dad, Mom, my sister Yu, my niece Jingyuan, and my nephew Yihan, I owe them many thanks for all of their love and support. Their words make me feel warm and strong. vi I present this thesis in honor of my parents. vii LIST OF TABLES 1.1 A list of the three generations of fundamental fermions and their properties. Only limits exist on the masses of neutrinos [3]. ..... 4 1.2 A list of the fundamental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of Large Electron Positron Collider 1
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Publications of the IAS Fellows GENERAL ç ARTICLE The Story of Large Electron Positron Collider 1. Fundamental Constituents of Matter S N Ganguli I nt roduct ion The story of the large electron positron collider, in short LEP, is linked intimately with our understanding of na- ture'sfundamental particlesand theforcesbetween them. We begin our story by giving a brief account of three great discoveries that completely changed our thinking Som Ganguli is at the Tata Institute of Fundamental and started a new ¯eld we now call particle physics. Research, Mumbai. He is These discoveries took place in less than three years currently participating in an during 1895 to 1897: discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm experiment under prepara- Roentgen in 1895, discovery of radioactivity by Henri tion for the Large Hadron Becquerel in 1896 and the identi¯cation of cathode rays Collider (LHC) at CERN, Geneva. He has been as electrons, a fundamental constituent of atom by J J studying properties of Z and Thomson in 1897. It goes without saying that these dis- W bosons produced in coveries were rewarded by giving Nobel Prizes in 1901, electron-positron collisions 1903 and 1906, respectively. X-rays have provided one at the Large Electron of the most powerful tools for investigating the struc- Positron Collider (LEP). During 1970s and early ture of matter, in particular the study of molecules and 1980s he was studying crystals; it is also an indispensable tool in medical diag- production and decay nosis.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 from Neutral Currents to Weak Vector Bosons
    12 From neutral currents to weak vector bosons The unification of weak and electromagnetic interactions, 1973{1987 Fermi's theory of weak interactions survived nearly unaltered over the years. Its basic structure was slightly modified by the addition of Gamow-Teller terms and finally by the determination of the V-A form, but its essence as a four fermion interaction remained. Fermi's original insight was based on the analogy with elec- tromagnetism; from the start it was clear that there might be vector particles transmitting the weak force the way the photon transmits the electromagnetic force. Since the weak interaction was of short range, the vector particle would have to be heavy, and since beta decay changed nuclear charge, the particle would have to carry charge. The weak (or W) boson was the object of many searches. No evidence of the W boson was found in the mass region up to 20 GeV. The V-A theory, which was equivalent to a theory with a very heavy W , was a satisfactory description of all weak interaction data. Nevertheless, it was clear that the theory was not complete. As described in Chapter 6, it predicted cross sections at very high energies that violated unitarity, the basic principle that says that the probability for an individual process to occur must be less than or equal to unity. A consequence of unitarity is that the total cross section for a process with 2 angular momentum J can never exceed 4π(2J + 1)=pcm. However, we have seen that neutrino cross sections grow linearly with increasing center of mass energy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model Part II: Charged Current Weak Interactions I
    Prepared for submission to JHEP The Standard Model Part II: Charged Current weak interactions I Keith Hamiltona aDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Rough notes on ... Introduction • Relation between G and g • F W Leptonic CC processes, ⌫e− scattering • Estimated time: 3 hours ⇠ Contents 1 Charged current weak interactions 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Leptonic charge current process 9 1 Charged current weak interactions 1.1 Introduction Back in the early 1930’s we physicists were puzzled by nuclear decay. • – In particular, the nucleus was observed to decay into a nucleus with the same mass number (A A) and one atomic number higher (Z Z + 1), and an emitted electron. ! ! – In such a two-body decay the energy of the electron in the decay rest frame is constrained by energy-momentum conservation alone to have a unique value. – However, it was observed to have a continuous range of values. In 1930 Pauli first introduced the neutrino as a way to explain the observed continuous energy • spectrum of the electron emitted in nuclear beta decay – Pauli was proposing that the decay was not two-body but three-body and that one of the three decay products was simply able to evade detection. To satisfy the history police • – We point out that when Pauli first proposed this mechanism the neutron had not yet been discovered and so Pauli had in fact named the third mystery particle a ‘neutron’. – The neutron was discovered two years later by Chadwick (for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize shortly afterwards in 1935).
    [Show full text]
  • Charged Current Anti-Neutrino Interactions in the Nd280 Detector
    CHARGED CURRENT ANTI-NEUTRINO INTERACTIONS IN THE ND280 DETECTOR BRYAN E. BARNHART HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER ADVISOR: ALYSIA MARINO Abstract. For the neutrino beamline oscillation experiment Tokai to Kamioka, the beam is clas- sified before oscillation by the near detector complex. The detector is used to measure the flux of different particles through the detector, and compare them to Monte Carlo Simulations. For this work, theν ¯µ background of the detector was isolated by examining the Monte Carlo simulation and determining cuts which removed unwanted particles. Then, a selection of the data from the near detector complex underwent the same cuts, and compared to the Monte Carlo to determine if the Monte Carlo represented the data distribution accurately. The data was found to be consistent with the Monte Carlo Simulation. Date: November 11, 2013. 1 Bryan E. Barnhart University of Colorado at Boulder Advisor: Alysia Marino Contents 1. The Standard Model and Neutrinos 4 1.1. Bosons 4 1.2. Fermions 5 1.3. Quarks and the Strong Force 5 1.4. Leptons and the Weak Force 6 1.5. Neutrino Oscillations 7 1.6. The Relative Neutrino Mass Scale 8 1.7. Neutrino Helicity and Anti-Neutrinos 9 2. The Tokai to Kamioka Experiment 9 2.1. Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex 10 2.2. The Near Detector Complex 12 2.3. The Super-Kamiokande Detector 17 3. Isolation of the Anti-Neutrino Component of Neutrino Beam 19 3.1. Experiment details 19 3.2. Selection Cuts 20 4. Cut Descriptions 20 4.1. Beam Data Quality 20 4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weak Interaction
    The Weak Interaction April 20, 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 The Weak Interaction 2 2.1 The 4-point Interaction . .3 2.2 Weak Propagator . .4 3 Parity Violation 5 3.1 Parity and The Parity Operator . .5 3.2 Parity Violation . .6 3.3 CP Violation . .7 3.4 Building it into the theory - the V-A Interaction . .8 3.5 The V-A Interaction and Neutrinos . 10 4 What you should know 11 5 Furthur reading 11 1 1 Introduction The nuclear β-decay caused a great deal of anxiety among physicists. Both α- and γ-rays are emitted with discrete spectra, simply because of energy conservation. The energy of the emitted particle is the same as the energy difference between the initial and final state of the nucleus. It was much more difficult to see what was going on with the β-decay, the emission of electrons from nuclei. Chadwick once reported that the energy spectrum of electrons is continuous. The energy could take any value between 0 and a certain maximum value. This observation was so bizarre that many more experiments followed up. In fact, Otto Han and Lise Meitner, credited for their discovery of nuclear fission, studied the spectrum and claimed that it was discrete. They argued that the spectrum may appear continuous because the electrons can easily lose energy by breamsstrahlung in material. The maximum energy observed is the correct discrete spectrum, and we see lower energies because of the energy loss. The controversy went on over a decade. In the end a definitive experiment was done by Ellis and Wooseley using a very simple idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Treiman Was Born in Chicago to a First-Generation Immigrant Family
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SAM BARD TREIMAN 1925–1999 A Biographical Memoir by STEPHEN L. ADLER Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 80 PUBLISHED 2001 BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. Courtesy of Robert P. Matthews SAM BARD TREIMAN May 27, 1925–November 30, 1999 BY STEPHEN L. ADLER AM BARD TREIMAN WAS a major force in particle physics S during the formative period of the current Standard Model, both through his own research and through the training of graduate students. Starting initially in cosmic ray physics, Treiman soon shifted his interests to the new particles being discovered in cosmic ray experiments. He evolved a research style of working closely with experimen- talists, and many of his papers are exemplars of particle phenomenology. By the mid-1950s Treiman had acquired a lifelong interest in the weak interactions. He would preach to his students that “the place to learn about the strong interactions is through the weak and electromagnetic inter- actions; the problem is half as complicated.’’ The history of the subsequent development of the Standard Model showed this philosophy to be prophetic. After the discovery of parity violation in weak interactions, Treiman in collaboration with J. David Jackson and Henry Wyld (1957) worked out the definitive formula for allowed beta decays, taking into account the possible violation of time reversal symmetry, as well as parity. Shortly afterwards Treiman embarked with Marvin Goldberger on a dispersion relations analysis (1958) of pion and nucleon beta decay, a 3 4 BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS major outcome of which was the famed Goldberger-Treiman relation for the charged pion decay amplitude.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model Lagrangian
    The Standard Model Lagrangian Elementary Particle Physics Strong Interaction Fenomenology Diego Bettoni Academic Year 2011-12 Dirac Formalism i m 0 j Conserved Current 0 0 1 1 0 i i 0 5 i 0 1 0 0 1 R L i m L D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 2 Gauge Invariance U i 1 1 igA A U U UA U Abelian D g D U D 1 W W D ig2 W i i ijk j k Non 2 g2 Abelian Gauge invariance requires the introduction of vector bosons, which act as quanta of new interactions. In gauge theories the symmetries prescribe the interactions. D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 3 The Symmetries of the Standard Model • U(1) invariance. All particles appear to have this kind of invariance, related to electromagnetism. It requires a vector boson, B, whose connection with the photon will be determined later. • SU(2) invariance. Non abelian gauge invariance (electroweak isospin). It requires three vector bosons, Wi , one for each generator of SU(2). The physical W particles have definite electromagnetic charges. 1 2 1 2 0 3 W W iW 2 W W iW 2 W W • SU(3) invariance. It requires eight vector bosons, Ga , the gluons, the quanta of the strong interaction, described by Quantum ChromoDynamics (QCD). D. Bettoni Fenomenologia Interazioni Forti 4 The Lagrangian • In order to obtain the Standard Model Lagrangian we start from the free particle Lagrangian and replace the ordinary derivative by the convariant derivative. It will contain two parts: Lgauge kinetic energies of the gauge fields Lferm covariant derivative fermion kinetic energies • Next we must specify the particles and their transformation properties under the three internal symmetries.
    [Show full text]
  • Weak Interactioninteraction
    WeakWeak InteractionInteraction OutlineOutline Introduction to weak interactions Charged current (CC) interactions Neutral current (NC) Weak vector bosons W± and Z0 Weak charged interactions Beta decay Flavour changing charged current W± boson propagator Fermi coupling constant Parity violation Muon decay Decay rate /lifetime Lepton Universality W± boson couplings for leptons Tau decays Weak quark decays W± boson couplings for quarks Cabibbo angle, CKM mechanism Spectator model Nuclear and Particle Physics Franz Muheim 1 IntroductionIntroduction Weak Interactions Account for large variety of physical processes Muon and Tau decays, Neutrino interactions Decays of lightest mesons and baryons Z0 and W± boson production at √s ~ O(100 GeV) Natural radioactivity, fission, fusion (sun) Major Characteristics Long lifetimes Small cross sections (not always) “Quantum Flavour Dynamics” Charged Current (CC) Neutral Current (NC) mediated by exchange of W± boson Z0 boson Intermediate vector bosons MW = 80.4 GeV ± 0 W and Z have mass MZ = 91.2 GeV Self Interactions of W± and Z0 also W± and γ Nuclear and Particle Physics Franz Muheim 2 BetaBeta DecayDecay Weak Nuclear Decays See also Nuclear Physics Recall β+ = e+ β- = e- Continuous energy spectrum of e- or e+ Î 3-body decay, Pauli postulates neutrino, 1930 Interpretation Fermi, 1932 Bound n or p decay − n → pe ν e ⎛ − t ⎞ N(t) = N(0)exp⎜ ⎟ ⎝ τ n ⎠ p → ne +ν (bound p) τ n = 885.7 ± 0.8 s e 32 τ 1 = τ n ln 2 = 613.9 ± 0.6 s τ p > 10 y (p stable) 2 Modern quark level picture Weak charged current mediated
    [Show full text]
  • Field Theory and the Standard Model
    Field theory and the Standard Model W. Buchmüller and C. Lüdeling Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, 22607 Hamburg, Germany Abstract We give a short introduction to the Standard Model and the underlying con- cepts of quantum field theory. 1 Introduction In these lectures we shall give a short introduction to the Standard Model of particle physics with empha- sis on the electroweak theory and the Higgs sector, and we shall also attempt to explain the underlying concepts of quantum field theory. The Standard Model of particle physics has the following key features: – As a theory of elementary particles, it incorporates relativity and quantum mechanics, and therefore it is based on quantum field theory. – Its predictive power rests on the regularization of divergent quantum corrections and the renormal- ization procedure which introduces scale-dependent `running couplings'. – Electromagnetic, weak, strong and also gravitational interactions are all related to local symmetries and described by Abelian and non-Abelian gauge theories. – The masses of all particles are generated by two mechanisms: confinement and spontaneous sym- metry breaking. In the following chapters we shall explain these points one by one. Finally, instead of a summary, we briefly recall the history of `The making of the Standard Model' [1]. From the theoretical perspective, the Standard Model has a simple and elegant structure: it is a chiral gauge theory. Spelling out the details reveals a rich phenomenology which can account for strong and electroweak interactions, confinement and spontaneous symmetry breaking, hadronic and leptonic flavour physics etc. [2, 3]. The study of all these aspects has kept theorists and experimenters busy for three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Learning in Search of Light Charged Higgs
    Deep-Learning in Search of Light Charged Higgs G. K. Demir ∗a, N. Sönmezb, and H. Do˜gana aDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Dokuz Eylül University, 35390, İzmir, Turkey bDepartment of Physics, Ege University, 35040, İzmir, Turkey Abstract In this work, we deep-learn light charged Higgs signal in top quark decays which poses difficulties due to strong W boson contamination. We construct Deep Neural Networks (DNN) with appropriate architecture and determine signal extraction efficiency by consid- ering various features (kinematical and human engineered parameters). Results show that DNN gives better performance than the classical neural networks and has ability to find regions of high efficiency even the input features are not human-engineered. In a sense, human-engineered high-level features are offset by DNNs with different combinations of the low-level kinematical features. Additionally, it is shown that increasing the number of pro- cessing units in DNNs does not necessarily cause an increase in efficiency due mainly to increased complexity. Our method and results can set an example of signal extraction from strong backgrounds. 1 Introduction Charged Higgs boson, frequently arising in models with more than one Higgs doublet, takes part in charged current interactions. The two-Higgs doublet model (2HDM) [1] or minimal supersymmetric model (MSSM) are perhaps the simplest models that can have a charged Higgs boson. The recent review volume [2] gives a detailed discussion of the charged Higgs boson H± in terms of possible models (according to quarks and leptons) and experimental bounds. In all searches, the goal is to disentangle the charged Higgs effects from the background, and this becomes a challenging task for light (mH± & 100 GeV), and weakly-coupled charged Higgs particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Fermi's Theory of Weak Interactions
    FERMI AND THE THEORY OF WEAK INTERACTIONS G. Rajasekaran Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Chennai 600113 and Chennai Mathematical Institute, Chennai 603103 e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The history of weak interactions starting with Fermi’s creation of the beta decay the- ory and culminating in its modern avatar in the form of the electroweak gauge theory is described. Discoveries of parity violation, matter-antimatter asymmetry, W and Z bosons and neutrino mass are highlighted. Introduction Sun gives us light and heat that makes life possible on the Earth. How do the Sun and stars produce energy and continue to shine for billions of years? Thermonuclear fusion is the answer as Eddington proposed in 1920 and Bethe demonstrated explicitly in 1939. Through a series of nuclear reactions, four protons (which are Hydrogen nuclei) in the core of the Sun combine to form a Helium nucleus emitting two positrons and two neutrinos and releasing 27 MeV of energy: 4 + + p + p + p + p He + e + e + νe + νe + 27MeV → This can be regarded as the most important reaction for all life, for without it there can be no life on Earth! The above reaction is caused by one of the basic forces of Nature, called weak interaction. Beta decays of nuclei and in fact the decays of most of the elementary particles are now known to be due to weak interaction. Enrico Fermi formulated the theory of weak interactions in 1934 and his theory has stood the ground very successfully with appropriate amendments and generalizations and finally served as a core part of the Standard Model of High Energy Physics, which is now known as the basis of almost ALL of Physics, except for gravitation.
    [Show full text]
  • 9. the Weak Force Particle and Nuclear Physics
    9. The Weak Force Particle and Nuclear Physics Dr. Tina Potter Dr. Tina Potter 9. The Weak Force 1 In this section... The charged current weak interaction Four-fermion interactions Massive propagators and the strength of the weak interaction C-symmetry and Parity violation Lepton universality Quark interactions and the CKM Dr. Tina Potter 9. The Weak Force 2 The Weak Interaction The weak interaction accounts for many decays in particle physics, e.g. − − − − µ ! e ν¯eνµ τ ! e ν¯eντ + − − π ! µ ν¯µ n ! pe ν¯e Characterised by long lifetimes and small interaction cross-sections Dr. Tina Potter 9. The Weak Force 3 The Weak Interaction Two types of weak interaction Charged current (CC): W ± bosons Neutral current (NC): Z bosons See Chapter 10 The weak force is mediated by massive vector bosons: mW = 80 GeV mZ = 91 GeV Examples: (The list below is not complete, will see more vertices later!) Weak interactions of electrons and neutrinos: − νe − e e νe Z W − W + Z + ν¯e e+ e ν¯e Dr. Tina Potter 9. The Weak Force 4 Boson Self-Interactions In QCD the gluons carrycolour charge. In the weak interaction the W ± and Z bosons carry the weak charge W ± also carry the electric charge ) boson self-interactions W − W − Z γ W + W + Z W + Z W + γ W + W + W + W − W − Z W − γ W − γ W − (The list above is complete as far as weak self-interactions are concerned, but we have still not seen all the weak vertices. Will see the rest later) Dr.
    [Show full text]