Los Angeles River Improvement Overalay (La Rio) Environmental Analysis Mitigated Negative Declaration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Los Angeles River Improvement Overalay (La Rio) Environmental Analysis Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Analysis 3/27/2008 LOS ANGELES RIVER IMPROVEMENT OVERALAY (LA RIO) ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AESTHETICS In the southern reaches, the areas covered under the LA RIO district are bordered by mixed uses and thus have a varied visual character. Along Valleyheart Drive in the San Fernando Valley, the area meanders and is bordered by large shrubs that provide cool shaded walkways. In contrast, a wide, barren easement borders the Tujunga Wash, and in downtown Los Angeles there is only limited access to an intensely urban and industrial riverfront. In the San Fernando Valley, the river is concrete lined and linear. Trees next to buildings sparsely line the river where Bell Creek and Calabasas Creek meet. Light and glare in this area is primarily associated with outdoor lighting for buildings. There is outdoor lighting for parking lots and the high school sports field, as well as street lighting. In downtown Los Angeles, a series of Art Deco and Classical Revival style bridges span the area covered within the LA RIO district (County of Los Angeles 1996). Historic buildings and sites add to the unique landscape of the urban environment. Rail lines are found at various locations adjacent to the Los Angeles River and with the LA RIO districts. Depending on location, the number of rail lines and the frequency of their use vary. The rail lines that are used infrequently or not at all are more likely to have a neglected appearance, which can diminish the attractiveness of an area. During most of the year, the cement channels have minimal water flows, various amounts and species of vegetation (including weeds and nonnative species), litter and debris, and, in many locations, graffiti. AIR QUALITY The federal Clean Air Act requires each state to identify areas where the ambient air quality violates federal standards. States are required to develop, adopt, and implement a state implementation plan (SIP) to achieve, maintain, and enforce federal Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) in these non-attainment areas. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is responsible for compiling and submitting the SIP to the USEPA. Local districts are responsible for preparing the portion of the SIP applicable within their boundaries (South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] 2006). The LA RIO lies within the South Coast Air Basin, which is managed by SCAQMD. Air quality problems in the South Coast Air Basin include periodic violations of federal and state air quality standards for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. The frequency with which ozone standards have been exceeded has declined significantly over recent decades. Through the implementation of air quality management plans, violations of the federal 1-hour ozone standard dropped from over 150 days per year prior to 1990 to fewer than 50 days per year in most years since 1999, except for the year 2003 (SCAQMD 2005a). However, violations of the federal 8-hour ozone standard have been at least exceeded by 80 days since 1999 (SCAQMD 1999, 2004, 2005b). No violations of federal or state 1 Environmental Analysis 3/27/2008 carbon monoxide standards have been recorded in the South Coast Air Basin since 2002. Areas that have been reclassified from non-attainment to attainment of federal air quality standards are automatically considered maintenance areas, although this designation is seldom noted in status listings. California classifies areas of the state as attainment, non-attainment, non-attainment- transitional, or unclassified with respect to the state AAQS. State and federal attainment status designations for the South Coast Air Basin are summarized in following table. Summary of Federal and State Attainment Status Designations for the South Coast Air Basin California Pollutant Averaging Time Federal Designation Designation Ozone 1-Hour No longer subject to Non-attainment standard 8-Hours Non-attainment – Severe Unclassified 17 Carbon 1-Hour Non-attainment-serious Attainment monoxide 8-Hours Non-attainment-serious Attainment Nitrogen Annual Average Maintenance Attainment dioxide 1-Hour Not applicable Attainment Sulfur dioxide Annual Average Attainment Not applicable 24-Hour Attainment Attainment 3-Hour Attainment Not applicable 1-Hour Not applicable Attainment PM10 Annual Average Non-attainment-serious Non-attainment 24-Hour Non-attainment-serious Non-attainment PM2.5 Annual Average Non-attainment Non-attainment 24-Hour Non-attainment Not applicable Lead Calendar Quarter No designation Not applicable 30-Day Not applicable Attainment Hydrogen 1-Hour Not applicable Unclassified sulfide Sulfates 24-Hour Not applicable Attainment Vinyl chloride 24-Hour Not applicable No designation Sources: CARB 2004; USEPA 2006 Green Book of attainment status designations The Severe-17 non-attainment designation for the federal 8-hour ozone standard indicates there is a 17-year deadline from the date of designation until the standard must be achieved. 2 Environmental Analysis 3/27/2008 The State and Local Air Monitoring Network Plan provides the results of the annual review of the air monitoring stations in California. These stations house monitoring instruments that measure ambient levels of air pollutants. The closest air monitoring station to the Canoga Park area is the Reseda Air Monitoring Station. Burbank West Palm Avenue Air Quality Monitoring Station is the one closest to the River Glen area, and Los Angeles-North Main Street Air Quality Monitoring Station is the station nearest the three downstream areas: Taylor Yard, Chinatown-Cornfields, and the Downtown Industrial area. At the Reseda monitoring station, ozone levels were higher than the standard state and national levels for 2005. No violation of other air quality standards was reported at this station. State and national ambient air quality standards for ozone were exceeded at the Burbank West Palm Avenue Station. Additionally, the national 24-hour PM10 standard was exceeded for 92 days during 2005. No other air pollutants were reported in violation of the ambient air quality standards at Burbank West Palm Avenue Station. Summary of 2005 Air Quality Data at Air Quality Monitoring Stations Burbank West Los Angeles- Palm North Main Reseda Avenue Street Ozone Highest 1-hour 0.138 0.142 0.121 observation National three- 0.106 0.089 0.076 year average of fourth highs Carbon Number of days 0 0 0 monoxide above national standard Number of days 0 0 0 above state standard Nitrogen Number of days 0 0 0 dioxide above state standard Sulfur Dioxide Number of days - 0 0 above national standard Number of days - 0 0 above state standard PM10 Estimated days * 92 70 over the 3 Environmental Analysis 3/27/2008 national 24- hour PM10 standard PM2.5 State annual * * * average Sources: CARB 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2005d, 2005e, 2005f, 2005g, 2005h, 2005i All measurements are in parts per million. *There was insufficient (or no) data available to determine the value. - Not monitored in this station. Ozone levels exceeded the state standard and were below the national standard at the Los Angeles-North Main Street Air Quality Monitoring Station. PM10 was above the national standard for 70 days during 2005. No other pollutants violation was reported for 2005 at the Los Angeles-North Main Street Air Quality Monitoring Station. CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES Cultural resources are locations of human activity, occupation, or use. They include expressions of human culture and history in the physical environment, such as archaeological sites, historic buildings and structures, or other culturally significant places. Cultural resources can also be natural features, plants, and animals or places that are considered to be important or sacred to a culture, subculture, or community. Resources may be important individually or as part of a grouping of complementary resources, such as a historic neighborhood. Historic Buildings and Structures: Historic building and structures are typically identified through archival and library research, followed by field reconnaissance and recordation. Historic buildings and structures are architecturally, historically, or artistically important individual and groups of residential, commercial, industrial, and transportation properties. In the City of Los Angeles there are several types of historic designations: • Historic-Cultural Monument designation by the city’s Cultural Heritage Commission and approved by the City Council; • Designation by the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) as being of cultural or historical significance within a designated redevelopment area; • Inclusion by the City Council in an Historic Preservation Overlay Zone (HPOZ); • Listed or eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR); • California Point of Historical Interest; • California Historical Landmark; or • Listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Traditional cultural properties are places associated with the cultural practices or beliefs of a living community. The significance of these places is derived from the role the 4 Environmental Analysis 3/27/2008 property plays in a community’s cultural identity, as defined by its beliefs, practices, history, and social institutions. Identifying any traditional cultural property or sacred site requires direct consultations with potentially affected communities. For Native American communities, there is a consultation protocol that begins when the specific project locations are defined. The California Native American
Recommended publications
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No. CF No. Adopted Community Plan Area CD Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 08/06/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 3 Woodland Hills - West Hills 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue & 7157 08/06/1962 Sunland - Tujunga - Lake View 7 Valmont Street Terrace - Shadow Hills - East La Tuna Canyon 3 Plaza Church 535 North Main Street and 100-110 08/06/1962 Central City 14 La Iglesia de Nuestra Cesar Chavez Avenue Señora la Reina de Los Angeles (The Church of Our Lady the Queen of Angels) 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill Street 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Dismantled May 1969; Moved to Hill Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, February 1996 5 The Salt Box 339 South Bunker Hill Avenue (Now 08/06/1962 Central City 14 Moved from 339 Hope Street) South Bunker Hill Avenue (now Hope Street) to Heritage Square; destroyed by fire 1969 6 Bradbury Building 300-310 South Broadway and 216- 09/21/1962 Central City 14 224 West 3rd Street 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho 10940 North Sepulveda Boulevard 09/21/1962 Mission Hills - Panorama City - 7 Romulo) North Hills 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 09/21/1962 Silver Lake - Echo Park - 1 Elysian Valley 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/02/1962 Canoga Park - Winnetka - 12 Woodland Hills - West Hills 10 Eagle Rock Eagle Rock View Drive, North 11/16/1962 Northeast Los Angeles 14 Figueroa (Terminus), 72-77 Patrician Way, and 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road 11 The Rochester (West Temple 1012 West Temple Street 01/04/1963 Westlake 1 Demolished February Apartments) 14, 1979 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 01/04/1963 Hollywood 13 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 01/28/1963 West Adams - Baldwin Hills - 10 Leimert City of Los Angeles May 5, 2021 Page 1 of 60 Department of City Planning No.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles River Jurisdictional Determination Special Case Cover
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901 JUL 6 2010 OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR Colonel Mark Toy District Engineer, Los Angeles District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 532711 Los Ange les, California 90053-2325 Dear Colonel Toy: This letter transmits the Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdictional determination for the Los Angeles River. On August 17, 2008, EPA's Assistant Administrator for Water designated the Los Angeles River as a "Special Case" as defined by the EPA-Corps 1989 Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) regarding coordination on matters ofgeographic jurisdiction. Pursuant to the MOA, designation ofthe "Special Case" made EPA responsib le for determining the extent to which the Los Angeles River was protected as a "water ofthe United States." Specifically, EPA analyzed the river's status as a "Traditional Navigable Water," one ofseveral categories ofjurisdictional waters under the Act. We conclude that the mainstem ofthe Los Angeles River is a "Traditional Navigable Water" from its origins at the confluence of Arroyo Calabasas and Bell Creek to San Pedro Bay at the Pacific Ocean, a distance of approximately 51 miles . In reaching this conclusion, Region 9 and Headquarters staffconsidered a number offactors, including the ability ofthe Los Angeles River under current conditions offlow and depth to support navigation by watercraft; the history ofnavigation by watercraft on the river; the current commercial and recreational uses of the river; and plans for future
    [Show full text]
  • The Pacoima Wash Greenway
    THE PACOIMA WASH GREENWAY Linking & Greening Communities Pacoima Demographics Located in Northeast San Fernando Valley 100,000 Residents 85% Latino, 8% African American 21% Live in garages or rented rooms 19% Receive Food Stamps 17% Below Poverty Level Cumulative Impacts The cumulative impacts of these pollution sources creates a toxic environment. Health Impacts 48% Child Obesity (3 X county average) 20% Asthma 6% Diabetes 75 Acres of Parks Less than 1-acre of parks per 1,000 Residents (recommended ratio is 10-acres to 1,000 residents) Pacoima Wash Project Funding Project funded through a Policies for Livable, Active Communities and Environments (PLACE) grant from the Los Angeles County Department of Health. Goal of the PLACE grant is “to foster policy change that supports the development of healthy, active environments for all Los Angeles County residents.” Pacoima Wash San Fernando: 1.6 Miles Sylmar: 2 Miles Pacoima: 1 Mile Arleta: 2.5 Miles _____________________ Total Greenway Length: 7.1 Miles Community Organizing Over 32 Focus groups 5 large community workshops, including an on- site mapping activity with over 100 residents 3 Working Events 200 Person Supporter Database Community Organizing Physical Project Before After Physical Project Before After Community Engagement Project Partners Community Engagement Accomplishments Completion of the Pacoima Wash Vision Plan Inclusion of the Vison Plan in the Sylmar Community Plan Two (2) New Pocket Parks Preliminary Engineering for 3.5 mile bikeway Anticipated Construction of 1.5 Mile Bike Path In San Fernando Next Steps / Challenges Construct Greenway Connect to Angeles National Forest and LA River Develop Funding Strategy Construct Additional Parks Strengthen Connections to Surrounding Community Thank you! Pacoima Beautiful 13520 Van Nuys Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • OUFS for North Hollywood Well Field Area of North Hollywood/Burbank NPL Site, SFV Groundwater Basin, W/Executive Summary
    POOR LEGIBILITY ONE OR MORE PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE DIFFICULT TO READ DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL V SFUND RECORDS CTR 2166-04905 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power SFUND RECORDS CTR 88134326 OPERABLE UNIT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE NORTH HOLLYWOOD WELL FIELD AREA OF THE NORTH HOLLYWOOD-BURBANK NPL SITE, SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN NOVEMBER 1986 n LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER OPERABLE UNIT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE NORTH HOLLYWOOD WELL FIELD AREA n / OF THE NORTH HOLLYWOOD-BURBANK NPL SITE, SAN FERNANDO VALLEY GROUNDWATER BASIN a November 17, 1986 p*« fi •i TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 FORWARD• 7 I. INTRODUCTION 10 Background 10 Importance of Los Angeles Groundwater 14 Regional Setting and Site Location 17 Hydrogeologic Setting1 18 Nature and Extent of Problem ' 19 n Characterization of Contaminant Incidence 22 II. IDENTIFICATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SCREENING OF REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES . 25 Overview of Screening 25 Screening Criteria . 26 Response Actions - 27 Summary of Preliminary Remedial Action Screening 58 III. DEVELOPMENT OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES . 60 Description of Groundwater Extraction/Conveyance System . 61 Alternative A - Aeration 62 Alternative B - Granular Activated Carbon Adsorption 66 Alternative C - Combined Aeration/GAC 70 Alternative D - Ultraviolet Irradiation/Ozonation 70 IV. SCREENING OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES 73 Environmental and Public Health Screening .74 Cost Screening 78 Recommendation and Summary of Candidate Treatment Methods . 83 V. TECHNICAL EVALUATION OF SCREENED ALTERNATIVES 86 Aeration ••'• ' ~ 87 Granular Activated Carbon Adsorption 90 Aeration/GAC 92 Summary of Technical Evaluation Process 95 Cost Comparison 98 . VI. INSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS . 103 Federal Agencies 105 State Agencies 106 Regional Agencies .
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Los Angeles County Arroyo Sequit Arroyo Sequit consists of about 3.3 stream miles. The arroyo is formed by the confluence of the East and West forks, from where it flows south to enter the Pacific Ocean east of Sequit Point. As part of a survey of 32 southern coastal watersheds, Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1979. The O. mykiss sampled were between about two and 6.5 inches in length. The survey report states, “Historically, small steelhead runs have been reported in this area” (DFG 1980). It also recommends, “…future upstream water demands and construction should be reviewed to insure that riparian and aquatic habitats are maintained” (DFG 1980). Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1989-1990 as part of a study of six streams originating in the Santa Monta Mountains. The resulting report indicates the presence of steelhead and states, “Low streamflows are presently limiting fish habitat, particularly adult habitat, and potential fish passage problems exist…” (Keegan 1990a, p. 3-4). Staff from DFG surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 1993 and captured O. mykiss, taking scale and fin samples for analysis. The individuals ranged in length between about 7.7 and 11.6 inches (DFG 1993). As reported in a distribution study, a 15-17 inch trout was observed in March 2000 in Arroyo Sequit (Dagit 2005). Staff from NMFS surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 2002 as part of a study of steelhead distribution. An adult steelhead was observed during sampling (NMFS 2002a). Additional documentation of steelhead using the creek between 2000-2007 was provided by Dagit et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 1987-88 Water Year Annual Report May 1989
    UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVER AREA WATER MASTER CITY OF LOS ANGELES VS. CITY OF SAN FERNANDO. ET AL CASE NO. 650079 - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES WATERMAST'ER SERVICE IN THE UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVER AREA LOS ANGELE·S COUNTY OCTOBER 1, 1987 - SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 MAY 1989 UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVER AREA WATERMASTER CITY OF LOS ANGELES VS. CITY OF SAN FERNANDO. ET AL CASE NO. 650079 - COUNTY OF LOS ANGElES MELVI:-.i L BLEVINS WATERMASTER. MAILING ADDRESS: Office I.ocatiun Room 1455 ULARA Water master III 'liorth Hope Street P.O. Box III. Rm. 1455 I. .. , Angeles, CA Los Angeles. CA 90051 Telephone 1~1.l14KI 6177 I 1 WATER MASTER SERVICE IN THE [ UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVER AREA LOS ANGELES CO.UNTY I OCTOBER 1, 1987 - SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 1 ) ) 1 1 \ MAY.1989 - - -- CO~VERSION FACTORS Enqlish to Metric System of ~easurement Quantity Enqlish unit ~ultiply by To get metric equivalent Length feet (ft) II, .3048 metres (m)· 'rl miles (mi) I; 1. 6093 kilometres (km) " 2 Area square feet (ft2) .092903 square metres (m ) 2 acres 4046.9 square metres (m ) .40469 hectares (hal .40469 square hectometres (hm~) .0040469 square kilometres (km2 ) square miles (mi2) 2.590 square kilometres (km2 ) Volwae gallons (qal) 3.7854 litres (1) 3 .0017854 cubic metres (m I 6 .illion gallons (10 gal) 3785.4 cubic metres (m 1) 3 cubic feet (ft3) .028317 cubic metres (m ) cubic yards (yd1) .76455 cubic metres (m) ) acre-feet (ac-ft) 1233.5 cubic metres (m) ) .0012335 cubic hectometres (hm 1) " 3 1.233 x 10-6 cubic kilometres (km ) V01U11le/Tiae 3 (Flow) cubic feet per second (ft /5) 28.317 litres per second (l/s) 3 .028117 cubic metres ~er second (~ /s) gallons per minute (qal/min) .06309 litres per second (l/s) 6.309 x 10-5 cubic metres per second (m]/s) million gallons per day (mqd) .043813 cubic metres per second (.]/5) miners inch* .70792 (.56634) litres per second (l/s) tF - 32 Temperature Degrees Fahrenheit (OF) -r:a- tC Deqre~s Celsius (OC) ...
    [Show full text]
  • W.W. Robinson Papers LSC.2072
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf858008db No online items Finding Aid for the W.W. Robinson Papers LSC.2072 Finding aid prepared by Dan Luckenbill and Octavio Olvera; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library Special Collections Online finding aid last updated on 2020 September 28. Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucla.edu/special-collections Finding Aid for the W.W. LSC.2072 1 Robinson Papers LSC.2072 Contributing Institution: UCLA Library Special Collections Title: W.W. Robinson papers Creator: Robinson, W.W. (William Wilcox) Identifier/Call Number: LSC.2072 Physical Description: 48.5 Linear Feet(97 boxes, 13 oversize boxes) Date (inclusive): cira 1843-1972 Abstract: William Wilcox Robinson (1891-1972) wrote many pamphlets, articles, and books on Southern California history, including: Ranchos Become Cities (1939), Land in California (1948), Los Angeles, a Profile (1968), and Bombs and Bribery (1969). He also wrote poetry, fiction, children's books, and essays, and served on boards of numerous organizations. The collection contains manuscript and research materials, papers related to Robinson's civic, literary, and social activities. The collection also includes family and personal correspondence, photographs, scrapbooks, and objects including awards, keepsakes, and decorations. Stored off-site. All requests to access special collections material must be made in advance using the request button located on this page. Language of Material: English . Conditions Governing Access Open for research. All requests to access special collections materials must be made in advance using the request button located on this page.en for research.
    [Show full text]
  • Rmarian Rdoda&J
    r.Marian ‘Vodge- 2648 'id. Commonwealth 'Avenue-■ dos Angeles. CA 40027 Re: CF 15-0548 Anza Trail Certification Honorable Councilmembers The certification of the Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail where is passes through Griffith Park along the Los Angeles River is a tremendous asset for the City of Los Angeles. It is an integral part of the the history of California and of the City. The success of the expedition in establishing the City of San Francisco solidified Spain’s claim to California and kept the Russians from claiming California. One of its soldados, Jose Vicente Feliz, was later assigned to El Pueblo de Los Angeles as its comisionado or city manager. For his excellent work Feliz was granted Rancho Los Feliz which later became Griffith Park and the Los Feliz district. One of the padres who accompanied the expedition kept a diary in which he describes the area where the Anza expedition camped beside the river where it makes a bend toward the west around a mountain. The mountain he describes is now Griffith Park and the level land where they camped is currently the LA Zoo parking lot, the Autry Museum, and Ferraro Soccer Fields. The Anza Trail complements the City’s River Revitalization Plan as well as the federally proposed Rim of the Valley Corridor and President Obama’s America’s Great Outdoors Initiative and “50 State Report.” This is a particularly important segment of the trail because it passes through publicly owned land so it is accessible to hikers and walkers. The certification of the Anza Trail allows the City to partner with the National Park Service to enhance recreational and interpretive opportunities along the LA River where it passes through Griffith Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Insect (Butterfly) Survey at Griffith Park, Los Angeles, California
    Kathy Keane October 30, 2003 Keane Biological Consulting 5546 Parkcrest Street Long Beach, CA 90808 Subject: Preliminary Insect (Butterfly) Survey at Griffith Park, Los Angeles, California. Dear Kathy: Introduction At the request of Keane Biological Consulting (KBC), Guy P. Bruyea (GPB) conducted a reconnaissance-level survey for the butterfly and insect inhabitants of Griffith Park in northwestern Los Angeles County, California. This report presents findings of our survey conducted to assess butterfly and other insect diversity within Griffith Park, and briefly describes the vegetation, topography, and present land use throughout the survey area in an effort to assess the overall quality of the habitat currently present. Additionally, this report describes the butterfly species observed or detected, and identifies butterfly species with potential for occurrence that were not detected during the present survey. All observations were made by GPB during two visits to Griffith Park in June and July 2003. Site Description Griffith Park is generally located at the east end of the Santa Monica Mountains northwest of the City of Los Angeles within Los Angeles County, California. The ± 4100-acre Griffith Park is situated within extensive commercial and residential developments associated with the City of Los Angeles and surrounding areas, and is the largest municipal park and urban wilderness area within the United States. Specifically, Griffith Park is bounded as follows: to the east by the Golden State Freeway (Interstate Highway 5) and the
    [Show full text]
  • Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments
    Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) List City Declared Monuments No. Name Address CHC No.CF No. Adopted Notes 1 Leonis Adobe 23537 Calabasas Road 8/6/1962 2 Bolton Hall 10116 Commerce Avenue 8/6/1962 3 Nuestra Senora la Reina de Los 100-110 Cesar E. Chavez Ave 8/6/1962 Angeles (Plaza Church) & 535 N. Main St 535 N. Main Street & 100-110 Cesar Chavez Av 4 Angel's Flight 4th Street & Hill8/6/1962 Dismantled 05/1969; Relocated to Hill Street Between 3rd St. & 4th St. in 1996 5 The Salt Box (Former Site of) 339 S. Bunker Hill Avenue 8/6/1962 Relocated to (Now Hope Street) Heritage Square in 1969; Destroyed by Fire 10/09/1969 6 Bradbury Building 216-224 W. 3rd Street 9/21/1962 300-310 S. Broadway 7 Romulo Pico Adobe (Rancho Romulo) 10940 Sepulveda Boulevard 9/21/1962 8 Foy House 1335-1341 1/2 Carroll Avenue 9/21/1962 9 Shadow Ranch House 22633 Vanowen Street 11/2/1962 10 Eagle Rock 72-77 Patrician Way 11/16/1962 7650-7694 Scholl Canyon Road Eagle Rock View Drive North Figueroa (Terminus) 11 West Temple Apartments (The 1012 W. Temple Street 1/4/1963 Rochester) 12 Hollyhock House 4800 Hollywood Boulevard 1/4/1963 13 Rocha House 2400 Shenandoah Street 1/28/1963 14 Chatsworth Community Church 22601 Lassen Street 2/15/1963 (Oakwood Memorial Park) 15 Towers of Simon Rodia (Watts 10618-10626 Graham Avenue 3/1/1963 Towers) 1711-1765 E. 107th Street 16 Saint Joseph's Church (site of) 1200-1210 S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Urban Sustainability and Environmental Justice in the Los Angeles River Watershed
    Restoring a River to Reclaim a City?: The Politics of Urban Sustainability and Environmental Justice in the Los Angeles River Watershed By Esther Grace Kim A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jeff Romm, Chair Professor Nancy Peluso Professor Richard Walker Fall 2017 Restoring a River to Reclaim a City?: The Politics of Urban Sustainability and Environmental Justice in the Los Angeles River Watershed Copyright © 2017 by Esther Grace Kim Abstract Restoring a River to Reclaim a City?: The Politics of Urban Sustainability and Environmental Justice in the Los Angeles River Watershed by Esther Grace Kim Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Jeff Romm, Chair This dissertation examines the intersection of urban sustainability and environmental justice (EJ) in Los Angeles, California. ‘Urban sustainability’, the idea that incorporating sustainable measures into urban development plans/strategies can ameliorate ecological degradation and social inequality without compromising economic growth, has recently emerged as a powerful discourse with regards to city planning and environmental governance. In this dissertation, I critically interrogate urban sustainability’s claims, questioning how equitable socio-spatial configurations can be created through modes of urban governance, which despite its optimistic rhetoric, are still driven by the logic of capitalist economic development and overseen by the racial state. To investigate the ways in which environmental justice, then, is facilitated and/or constrained under the programmatic realization of urban sustainability, I focus on one particular sustainability project in Los Angeles—the restoration/revitalization of the Los Angeles River Watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FERNANDO VALLEY COUNCIL of GOVERNMENTS a Joint Powers Authority
    SAN FERNANDO VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS A Joint Powers Authority BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA Thursday, January 21, 2021 — 1:30 p.m. DUE TO THE CLOSURE OF CITY BUILDINGS, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY CALL IN TO LISTEN TO THE MEETING Please click the link below to watch or listen to the meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89443558659?pwd=L3VSSnk1bXMvaXNZM3JKV0pnb3 J6UT09 Or call by telephone: Dial 669-900-6833 and enter Webinar ID: 894 4355 8659 For those wishing to speak on an agenda item, please email [email protected] no ​ ​ later than 11:00 a.m. on the day of the scheduled meeting with the item number you ​ ​ ​ ​ wish to speak on and the phone number you will use when calling or the name you will use when logging into the meeting. You should then call or log into the meeting at least 10 minutes prior to its start time. Staff will unmute you and announce you when it is your time to speak. You will have two (2) minutes to speak, unless that time is adjusted by the Chair. If you do not have access to a computer please call 818-570-3408 to request public comment. As an alternative to speaking during the meeting, you can email your comments to the COG executive director at at [email protected] no later than 11am on January ​ ​ 21, 2021 to ensure that Staff San Fernando Valley Council of Governments Board of Directors Meeting ​ Agenda - T​ hursday, January 21, 2021 ​ 1 has time to organize the emails prior to the beginning of the meeting.
    [Show full text]